Will I look guilty if I ask for a solicitor in a police interview?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 сен 2024
- This is the eighth in a series of videos which answer some of the most commonly asked questions our criminal defence team at Old Bailey Solicitors receive.
In this video, director Camilla Rents looks at whether a client would appear to be guilty if they ask for a solicitor during a police interview and how everyone has a right to legal advice. Also why it's so important to have a UK solicitor who is an expert on criminal law.
For more information, or to get in touch, please visit www.oblaw.co.uk/
![Will you look guilty if you ask for a solicitor in a police interview? [Criminal law explainer]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XhWOrOW4B5g/mqdefault.jpg)
![Baby Kia - GLOVES & DRACS (BLACK AF1s) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ajm8LeB0qQk/mqdefault.jpg)
Never think that the truth will get you out of it. The police construct their questioning in such a way as to get the answers they want from you and they know far better than you how the courts will view a situation. You might think that your statements show your innocence but almost anything can be twisted to put you in a bad light. A solicitor is able to tell you when police threats are empty and which questions might harm your defence if not answered. If you make an innocent mistake the police can get you on the defensive and make you look very guilty. Let the truth come out in court, not in an environment where the state can mis-represent your demeanour to the court. In most circumstances you can only talk yourself into trouble. Don't forget that there are so many things that most people aren't even aware are illegal and if you inadvertantly admit to one of them the state can get very vindictive. There are also plain errors made by the police in gathering evidence and you are not the one the court is going to believe.
Don't get baited by the old "if you've got nothing to hide" line. It's quite ironic how frequently the police get agitated by being recorded.
You don't look guilty.
You look like someone who values their privacy.
No comment to every question. Police are not interested in you “getting your side of the story across” or “helping you clear your name.” They just want a conviction, whether you’re guilty or not.
The police probably already think you are guilty
No, no, no!!! Always ask for a Solicitor!
Never use a duty solicitor. There friends with the police
Dont be silly. Most cops think they are a waste of space.
Some, yes, but it depends. If you have no option - e.g. you don't have the number of a solicitor handy - use a duty solicitor but listen to what they say to see if they're trying to make sure you go free or just trying to make things easy for them. For example, them telling you to say "no comment" and telling you the cops don't have a leg to stand on is one thing, them telling you something like "it's probably best if you just plead guilty" is another thing.
When I was recently arrested for cyber crime they asked if I wanted a solicitor, I declined and just gave them vague details on the offense. Next time, when they interview me I'll consider a solicitor but honestly, I'm not too bothered by it.
You are very lucky to get through that interview without getting screwed. Please lawer up next time.
@@RottiDog100 represented myself and then when the charges were drop was told because it was my story matched out
You're not thinking things through clearly, Kane.
You might have gotten through a questionable situation once, but stop and think about it for a minute.
Pigs just want to wrap up the job. They've also seen lots of cop shows that empowers them, the real pigs, to be judgmental, critical, bullying etc and don't forget they're armed in an unarmed society. They are almost sure to exceed their authority somehow.
Stop and think.
you are naive you got lucky that's all.
Duckenfield the mass murderer had two words "No Comment" he never went to jail for his mass slaughter.
Comparing yourself to the skill of a brain surgeon is a bit rich!
Are you American or something? You seem to have got confused, like Americans do, between the principle of the argument and the content of the argument. The principle is that you should not undergo something that takes skill and experience without someone skilled and experience. The content (solicitor and brain surgeon) were just used to illustrate. She's clearly not comparing herself to the skill of a brain surgeon.
@@rogueuniversities6866 I’m not American
@@IntelligentEating Then why do you act like one?