My opinion is that the Dake is by far the Best Study Bible by far. No Study Bible with notes is % 100 right, nor will anyone agree %100 with. But I’ve got to say I agree with Dake on most of He’s stuff. All of it? No. But way more so than not. He does a great job backing up what he says. Thanks for the video!
@Todd Griffin... I like Dakes as well for the simple reason of all the study notes... but do you believe in the Gap Theory?.. cuz that is what he tries to expound.. that the age we are in now is the one after the Prehistoric age of dinosaurs...and you are correct in not agreeing with Dakes notes or any study bible's notes 100%... as long as one is careful.. they should be ok using it....
The Dake cross-reference system is the most exhaustive of any study Bible. As for his notes; chew the meat and spit out the bones. I don’t pay too much attention to opinion. I prefer solid exegesis of the Biblical text. Thank you for the review sir. Pastor Brett
Hey there do u know if the limitation leather dake is sewn Binding the description christian book store says glued binding and i think and hope there incorrect.thank u
Praise the Lord Sister,can you please tell how to check Complete concordance and Cyclopedic Index For example : Noah(51) defined K-1 9-2 2 Persons called N.,b 308-1 Please guide sister
@Ekklesia52... oh... I did not know they changed the design of it internally.?.. I have one from 1979... I'll have to check to see if mine is 4 column as well.....
I have had this bible for years. I use it for the definitions, history and lists. If you are studying I would imagine one would use more references to establish fact. I find no fault in it as a tool. They ( whoever they are) say there are thousands of mistakes in his work. But I notice that they/no one, has bothered to do a definitive work to let us know what they are. Good review.
+Ellen Krause I haven't found a thing wrong with this bible and it knew it had to be good when I heard a pastor who I know is a Freemason (secret Luciferian) HATING on this bible. As for the comments before mine, I suspect they are secret society members as well.
@Ellen Krause... I like Dakes.. I also like the Ruckman study bible... Ruckman is way more opinionated and crass than Dakes.. at least Dakes is Not too offensive... I recently picked up a 1979.. copyrighted one.. with the original racial comments in it... just to contrast it to the post 1998.. ones..as long as one can read thru the older version and Not be offended by it .. it's a fair bible.... a group of pastors got together... I believe... in the 90's and were able to get Dakes to change some comments...do you believe in the Gap theory?... many do.... I don't... I also do Not believe in Lilith....
Thanks for the video. I think of Dake's Annotated Bible as the Best of Study Bibles and the Worst of Study Bibles at the same time. Obviously, Finis J. Dake spent lots of time in Bible Study. There are tons of sermon outlines that most people could use. It is Dake's Commentary that gets him into trouble. I've never looked into the newer 3 column Dake, so your videos was good to watch for that reason. I have an old 4 column Dake's. Finis Dake believed red letter Bibles de-emphasized the other pages of the scripture, so the old Dake's were Black Letter. I prefer Black Letter to Red Letter, but its not a big issue for me at all. My favorite Reference Bible is the KJV Thompson Chain. But, after knowing about the Dake Bible for almost 40 years, I decided to buy a good used bonded leather copy this year. I don't think to colorful charts are in my Dake's.
@Philip Voerding... I agree with you.. regarding Dakes .. I think we are both on the same page....... every Bonded Leather bible I have ever used however...has started to peel or crack within the first year of use... I stick to the Genuine Leather ones only now.. I am tired to taping the covers up to keep them from peeling away... .. by the way what do you think of this guy's comments regarding the name ...Finis.?.... stating its probably pronounced Phineas..?... I 've alvays pronounced it Finis.. as in the word finish.. with the short i's.. or is it Finis?.. as in Finest?.with the long I in the front?...
I like your Spanish accent my country brother. I have and understand you clearly. You asked him to give you his hand and to sit. Lol I'm Puerto Rican by the way. It's so cute how he was so eager to come to you when you asked him to give you his hand
I appreciate this review.. but some things that were Not brought into light... for one... though you showed the supplemental booklet that came with the bible.. you did not mention that it appeared to have been folded over sloppily when packaged so that reading material seams to be akilter to the crease.. as opposed to be running perpendicular.. to it.. poor packaging.. will make me disatisfied with the purchase... what about the single ribbon marker?.. did you know that these should be an appropiate length?... this marker looks like it serves ok as a book marker.. but technically the function of the book mark should be so that one can grab the end of the visible ribbon.. and yse that to find the page marked... meaning it should clear the bottom of the corner of the bible.. so that it can be pulled up anf around the edge... this marker does not appear to be long enough to serve that function properly... als... Yes Daje was very opunionated.. to the point of being considered a racist.. by todays standards.. so much so that the versions of Dake's bibles.. from 1998 on til now have been slightly altered...the offensive comments removed... the Peter Ruckman study bible is way more biased in his comments.. with the offensive statements still in that Bible...and from what I have noticed when studying the layouts of my Dakes bib les.. is that the underlining has to do with comments.. in the study notes..
From my research it appears that Dake underlined what he felt was important or what he felt was the main topic of a verse. (Not confirmed, only opinions I'v read online)
@joseph faulkner... my thoughts were the underlined words were to point to some note regarding them on that page.. perhaps.. for example the words"here now"... these 2 words would later be found together in one of the lists on thesame page....
I have not marked in this Bible but I would guess that it does based on handling the paper. I only us one highlighter and its the GTL Bible dry highlighter. The only highlighter that I have found that does not bleed through.
@christopher davis.... yes.... on this bible typical.. wet highlighters will bleed through... on most Dakes..... you might be able to find a thicker papered one.. but most I have seen are about 28-32 gsm..India paper.... you would be better off using a dry mark highlighter.. just to be safe...
@Frederico Carvalho... I am not sure exactly the page count.. on the Dakes.. but I believe.. the N.T. begins numbering from # 1 again.. and of course the large prints will be more.. but if I remember correctly.. the O.T. is about 900 pages and the N.T..... with the concordance is about 400 or so.. not exactly sure.. but the bible does not need to be very thick..since.. the notes are so tight on the pages... if they were written in the design of most bibles this bible would probably stretch to 2500-3000 pages...
It does look good actually. Think I'll go for this one. I'm just starting out with learning Christianity and wanting to know Jesus and God more, along with all the apostles. I would prefare KJB over NKJB because it's the TRUE word of God rather than watered down
God bless you brother. Be strong in the Lord. To finish this trial times were walking in we must put on the whole armor of God and keep our eyes in Jesus Christ of Nazareth resting in all his promises and instructions and knowing that he will be with us as we walk through the fire.. literally! Pray always with all kinds of prayers and supplication for all the brethren without CEASING. Shalom be safe. Pray!📯🛐☝️😇🙏📖⚔️🛡️👸
@David McEwan... you are correct in choosing the KJV for your bible God Bless you...Dakes is a good bible... but as of now 3 years after your original post.. I am sure that you have seen .. Dakes is better for preparing a Sunday School lesson or memorization of scripture.. than it is for being informative.. .. after studying the Bible many years... I have found that certain study bibles are great devotional bibles..... Matthew Henry... Life Application...etc... some are good informative bibles.. Thompsons Ryries.. Scofield.. Falwell....Zondervan's ... Life in the Spirit....etc..... others are like Dakes.. more helpful in being concise.. and cutting the fat away.. to see what we need to remember about the passage..
@David McEwan..... I know this is probably 3 yrs too late.. but I just noticed your comment regarding the use of Dakes bible.. I use this as well.. off and on... But if you study thru this Bible long enough you need tonbe aware of some flaws in Dakes philosophy..... for 1... there is no proof that the world we live in now is God's second creation... or that "Gap Theory".. which Dake believes... is valid....if one were to believe this.. we would have to believe that death entered the world before Adam.. and Sin..... or that Sin was in a pre-world before Adam... for the wages of sin are death... did Dinosaurs sin?.. why were they destroyed by God.. in a ..pre-Adamic world...?. I know many are using this theory to explain fossils being billions of years old... but the easier belief is that the man made carbon- dating process.. is in error.. what the dating process is citing as billions of years may only be thousands... also point 2.. Dake believes the Job of the book of Job.. was.. the Grandson of Jacob..since the name Job.../Joshuab or something to that effect is mentioned as a decendant of Issachar... Genesis 46:13...I disagree.. there is no proof of this.. and the time frame does Not fit.. besides the geographical location of each in relation to each other being way off... If you adamantly study God's word which I trust you do.. you will find several other flaws in his.. conclusions and assumptions... ..as I said I use Dakes myself.. but that being said.. one using Dakes.. must be careful.. and know how to sift the wheat from the tares... I hope you are...
Dake set the standard for the maximum amount of heresy a single guy can fit into a single volume. i mean just look at the first three endorsements lol come on
@Hondo...... I know this is probably 9 months too late.. but I just noticed your comment regarding the use of Dakes bible.. I agree....I use Dakes . off and on..only for the refererences occasionally... if one studies thru this bible they will easily be aware of some flaws in Dakes philosophy..... for 1... there is no proof that the world we live in now is God's second creation... or that "Gap Theory".. which Dake believes... is valid....if one were to believe this.. we would have to believe that death entered the world before Adam.. and Sin..... or that Sin was in a pre-world before Adam... for the wages of sin are death... did Dinosaurs sin?.. why were they destroyed by God.. in a ..pre-Adamic world...?. I know many are using this theory to explain fossils being billions of years old... but the easier belief is that the man made carbon- dating process.. is in error.. what the dating process is citing as billions of years may only be thousands... also point 2.. Dake believes the Job of the book of Job.. was.. the Grandson of Jacob..since the name Job.../Joshuab or something to that effect is mentioned as a decendant of Issachar... Genesis 46:13...I disagree.. there is no proof of this.. and the time frame does Not fit.. besides the geographical location of each in relation to each other being way off... If one adamantly studies God's word.. one will easily find several other flaws in Dake's .. conclusions and assumptions... ..as I said I occasionally use Dakes myself.. but that being said.. one using Dakes.. must be careful.. and know how to sift the wheat from the tares....
@@jeffcarlson3269Dake believed God has a real body and that every time you read about God’s hand or Mouth you should take that literally. And that’s the three persons of the Godhead each have their own body. This is straight up heresy.
@@a.t.6322 that is as I said.. many of Dake's beliefs were heretical and unfounded... however... I think a well grounded Christian should be able to sift thru the notes.. and use ONLY the accurate ones..(ones that support God's word)... Dake's bible can be an invaluable resource... due to his lists... he counts everything...EVERY... word... sin ...question.... chapter....etc...is all listed somewhere in Dake's.. also the concordance has several thousand passage references... I use Dake's.... so I do not have to whip out my 10 lb Stong's concordance on every single word I wish to look up cross passages to.. AGAIN... I would state... one needs to be careful.. with Dake's ... his theology is not always sound.. but.. the work he did.. in coordinating passages. .and helping others to find what they are looking for in God's word is invaluable..
Great reference bible. It is the best out there, hands down. However, Dake’s viw of Sunday as sabbath is way off. Saturday was changed to Sunday in Fourth Century, A.D.. Also, the 10 Commandments are NOT OBSOLETE. Nowhere in scripture does it say they are obsolete.
Have no idea about this study Bible, but I do know that the Sabbath is the only commandment of the 10 commandments not brought over the the N.T. Sure it's a good practice as a Christian, but it is not a N.T. commandment. The Sabbath was given specifically to the Jews as a SIGN, because the Jews require a sign: Moreover also I gave them my sabbaths, to be a sign between me and them, that they might know that I am the LORD that sanctify them. Ezekiel 20:12 KJV I am the LORD your God; walk in my statutes, and keep my judgments, and do them; and hallow my sabbaths; and they shall be a sign between me and you, that ye may know that I am the LORD your God. Ezekiel 20:19-20 KJV Speak thou also unto the children of Israel, saying, Verily my sabbaths ye shall keep: for it is a sign between me and you throughout your generations; that ye may know that I am the LORD that doth sanctify you. Exodus 31:13 KJV For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom: 1 Corinthians 1:22 KJV
Sadly - I have to agree. Too many ' bias '. The Word is to SPEAK for itself. Your information has confirmed my 'quandary'. To buy one or not to buy one. Thank you.
Being endorsed by those heretics (Hinn, Meyers, etc) should be a warning. Dake was also an arch-heretic, such as teaching God is composed of 9 individuals. There are much better study bibles out there. Being wordy does not make you Godly.
I've GOT to issue a disclaimer here as a pentecostal minister. Finis dake was kicked out of the Assemblies of God and soent time in prison for transpirting a minor across state lines for the purpise of having sex. It was during this time dake wrote his books like God's plan for man which were later adapted for a study bible which is what's being reviewed in this video. Unfortunately dake also held onto some pretty serious heresies. The very first note in the new testament of this bible says the Jesus did not become the Christ or messiah until he was baptized of John in the jordan river. It seems like a small gheresy until we realize that the old testament prophecies that God himself would be the messiah and at this point we can conclude that dake held to an antichristian heresy known as the cerenthian heresy, and that dake here teaches that Jesus not only became messiah but God the Son, the Son of God. Thus denying the Triune nature of God. Then he contradicts this teaching in ither places. Furthermore it must be said that while dake affirmed the doctrine of the Trinity with his lips he taught against the doctrine in his theology byy saying each member of the godhead had His own Spirit, Soul, and Body. This is not trinitarianism, but rather tritheism. Tritheism is the belief in 3 gods. Trinitarianism is the belief that there is one being of God who eternally exists as three coeternal, coequal, persons. This is just the tip of the tip of the iceberg of dake's heresies. His bible is indeed the preferred study bible of charismaniacs, and those who claim to be Pentecostal but are in fact deceived. A good example of a Pentecostal study bible is the Fire Bible, also available as the Life in the Spirit study Bible.
@@allensagalla6340 the spirit filled life bible also has notes from many known heretics from the word of faith movement and is not very pentecostal. The eat the meat and spit out the bones thing wouldn't be realistic advice for someone who gets a study bible. People get study bibles to help them learn what the bible means so they're relying on the author's for a right interpretation of scripture because they don't know what it means. So they won't know what to eat and what to spit out.
@KrownSkull please notice, they were under the mosaic covenant, nit the christian covenant. You can't excuse sin. God commands all men everywhere to repent.
Ok I need to speak up here. Your actions toward the Bible, box is irreverent. You toss, drop the items with disrespect. This is Gods Word and the company who is providing you with this Bible deserves respect and appreciation. I moved onto a different video to learn about this Bible. Watch how the Journeyman Messenger treats the Bible during his video.
@Lori Briesacher... interesting that you would comment on his actions regarding the box... cuz I commented to him that I thought the supplemental flyer that came with the bible.. was packaged sloppily.. If I had purchased a bible and the supplimental materials were folded wrong or just thrown in the box with the bible.. I would have been very upset... I have actually bought new bibles.. where the title pages and copyright bages have been crimped.. creased..... this to me is VERY upsetting... that is why I shiver having to buy one even a new bible online... cuz you don't know what you'll get until it's been delivered.. and sending things back are a real inconvenience...
Lori, I thought I was the only one who was thinking that! Thank you for having the courage to say it. God's Word should be handled respectfully at all times.
Unless you are doctrinally sound in your theology and know what the Bible teaches about salvation, Jews, Eschatology, Eternal Security, etc you will have difficulty with the commentary portion of this Bible, a lot of heresy concerning salvation, keeping saved, who a portion of scripture was written to and if you want to know how to wrongly divide the word of God then you have it here, , why would you want a study Bible that dosent line up with correct doctrine? If your Pentecostal/ Charismatic you will agree with most of his commentary but he says we are not completely saved until the end when we die if we make it to the end of our lives and also he gives a list of requirements for the rapture and much more that Christians have to do to remain saved till the end, let alone what he believes about the Trinity is mind blowing- stay away from this u less you can overlook the heresies and use the rest of the info , the charts in the back are good
@Kyle C... IMO... even so.. I think every Bible Library should at least have one copy of Dakes.. just to look at it once and a while.. that's what I do.. I'll pull it down look through some lists and put it back....
My opinion is that the Dake is by far the Best Study Bible by far. No Study Bible with notes is % 100 right, nor will anyone agree %100 with. But I’ve got to say I agree with Dake on most of He’s stuff. All of it? No. But way more so than not. He does a great job backing up what he says. Thanks for the video!
@Todd Griffin... I like Dakes as well for the simple reason of all the study notes... but do you believe in the Gap Theory?.. cuz that is what he tries to expound.. that the age we are in now is the one after the Prehistoric age of dinosaurs...and you are correct in not agreeing with Dakes notes or any study bible's notes 100%... as long as one is careful.. they should be ok using it....
Kjv or nkjv?
The Dake cross-reference system is the most exhaustive of any study Bible. As for his notes; chew the meat and spit out the bones. I don’t pay too much attention to opinion. I prefer solid exegesis of the Biblical text.
Thank you for the review sir.
Pastor Brett
Thank You!
Hey there do u know if the limitation leather dake is sewn Binding the description christian book store says glued binding and i think and hope there incorrect.thank u
Praise the Lord Sister,can you please tell how to check Complete concordance and Cyclopedic Index
For example : Noah(51) defined K-1 9-2
2 Persons called N.,b 308-1
Please guide sister
I have a retro Dakes with the four column layout, not sure if I like the newer version as much. Thanks for sharing!
@Ekklesia52... oh... I did not know they changed the design of it internally.?.. I have one from 1979... I'll have to check to see if mine is 4 column as well.....
Someone should have told you that it is from the Pentecostal POV. For a while, Dake was all the rage in my church. All the "Cool Kids" had one.
please do a review on Willmington's Guide to the Bible...………
How much?
Thank you!
I’d like to buy one!
Wow!... what a study bible!!! 😲
Definitely I want it!...
Thank you!
The BEST study BIBLE.
www.equip.org/article/dakes-dangerous-doctrine/
I have had this bible for years. I use it for the definitions, history and lists. If you are studying I would imagine one would use more references to establish fact. I find no fault in it as a tool. They ( whoever they are) say there are thousands of mistakes in his work. But I notice that they/no one, has bothered to do a definitive work to let us know what they are. Good review.
Ellen Krause it’s full of repackaged heresy such as tritheism, Arianism, salvation by works, etc.
For one he taught tritheism. That in itself will damn you.
+Ellen Krause I haven't found a thing wrong with this bible and it knew it had to be good when I heard a pastor who I know is a Freemason (secret Luciferian) HATING on this bible. As for the comments before mine, I suspect they are secret society members as well.
@Ellen Krause... I like Dakes.. I also like the Ruckman study bible... Ruckman is way more opinionated and crass than Dakes.. at least Dakes is Not too offensive... I recently picked up a 1979.. copyrighted one.. with the original racial comments in it... just to contrast it to the post 1998.. ones..as long as one can read thru the older version and Not be offended by it .. it's a fair bible.... a group of pastors got together... I believe... in the 90's and were able to get Dakes to change some comments...do you believe in the Gap theory?... many do.... I don't... I also do Not believe in Lilith....
@@sgedeon01 ... ha some people like that...... I say to them Matt 7:22,23
Thanks so much for sharing.
Great review well done. God Bless
Thank you much!
Thanks for the video. I think of Dake's Annotated Bible as the Best of Study Bibles and the Worst of Study Bibles at the same time. Obviously, Finis J. Dake spent lots of time in Bible Study. There are tons of sermon outlines that most people could use. It is Dake's Commentary that gets him into trouble.
I've never looked into the newer 3 column Dake, so your videos was good to watch for that reason. I have an old 4 column Dake's. Finis Dake believed red letter Bibles de-emphasized the other pages of the scripture, so the old Dake's were Black Letter. I prefer Black Letter to Red Letter, but its not a big issue for me at all.
My favorite Reference Bible is the KJV Thompson Chain. But, after knowing about the Dake Bible for almost 40 years, I decided to buy a good used bonded leather copy this year. I don't think to colorful charts are in my Dake's.
@Philip Voerding... I agree with you.. regarding Dakes .. I think we are both on the same page....... every Bonded Leather bible I have ever used however...has started to peel or crack within the first year of use... I stick to the Genuine Leather ones only now.. I am tired to taping the covers up to keep them from peeling away... .. by the way what do you think of this guy's comments regarding the name ...Finis.?.... stating its probably pronounced Phineas..?... I 've alvays pronounced it Finis.. as in the word finish.. with the short i's.. or is it Finis?.. as in Finest?.with the long I in the front?...
I like your Spanish accent my country brother. I have and understand you clearly. You asked him to give you his hand and to sit. Lol I'm Puerto Rican by the way. It's so cute how he was so eager to come to you when you asked him to give you his hand
@Mayra J. Torres... are you sure you posted this on the right thread?.. cuz this one is discussing Dakes bible review.....
Hello I am From India
I Want To Buy This Bible
Could You Please Help Me Out
The Study Bible is available on Amazon.in, and flipkart.com.
I appreciate this review.. but some things that were Not brought into light... for one... though you showed the supplemental booklet that came with the bible.. you did not mention that it appeared to have been folded over sloppily when packaged so that reading material seams to be akilter to the crease.. as opposed to be running perpendicular.. to it.. poor packaging.. will make me disatisfied with the purchase... what about the single ribbon marker?.. did you know that these should be an appropiate length?... this marker looks like it serves ok as a book marker.. but technically the function of the book mark should be so that one can grab the end of the visible ribbon.. and yse that to find the page marked... meaning it should clear the bottom of the corner of the bible.. so that it can be pulled up anf around the edge... this marker does not appear to be long enough to serve that function properly... als... Yes Daje was very opunionated.. to the point of being considered a racist.. by todays standards.. so much so that the versions of Dake's bibles.. from 1998 on til now have been slightly altered...the offensive comments removed... the Peter Ruckman study bible is way more biased in his comments.. with the offensive statements still in that Bible...and from what I have noticed when studying the layouts of my Dakes bib les.. is that the underlining has to do with comments.. in the study notes..
Luv me some Dakes...have the compact,NKJV LP and KJV LP...great Bible! Btw,does anyone know what the underlined words mean? I can't seem to find out.
From my research it appears that Dake underlined what he felt was important or what he felt was the main topic of a verse. (Not confirmed, only opinions I'v read online)
@joseph faulkner... my thoughts were the underlined words were to point to some note regarding them on that page.. perhaps.. for example the words"here now"... these 2 words would later be found together in one of the lists on thesame page....
Fascinating...
nice bible bro ...i need one bible sponser for me india ..pls help me or arrange any sponer for me
Well done
Do highlighters bleed on this paper looks thin?
I have not marked in this Bible but I would guess that it does based on handling the paper. I only us one highlighter and its the GTL Bible dry highlighter. The only highlighter that I have found that does not bleed through.
@christopher davis.... yes.... on this bible typical.. wet highlighters will bleed through... on most Dakes..... you might be able to find a thicker papered one.. but most I have seen are about 28-32 gsm..India paper.... you would be better off using a dry mark highlighter.. just to be safe...
Great review, nice bible!
Number of pages?
@Frederico Carvalho... I am not sure exactly the page count.. on the Dakes.. but I believe.. the N.T. begins numbering from # 1 again.. and of course the large prints will be more.. but if I remember correctly.. the O.T. is about 900 pages and the N.T..... with the concordance is about 400 or so.. not exactly sure.. but the bible does not need to be very thick..since.. the notes are so tight on the pages... if they were written in the design of most bibles this bible would probably stretch to 2500-3000 pages...
@@jeffcarlson3269 Thank you very much!
It does look good actually. Think I'll go for this one. I'm just starting out with learning Christianity and wanting to know Jesus and God more, along with all the apostles. I would prefare KJB over NKJB because it's the TRUE word of God rather than watered down
God bless you brother. Be strong in the Lord. To finish this trial times were walking in we must put on the whole armor of God and keep our eyes in Jesus Christ of Nazareth resting in all his promises and instructions and knowing that he will be with us as we walk through the fire.. literally! Pray always with all kinds of prayers and supplication for all the brethren without CEASING. Shalom be safe. Pray!📯🛐☝️😇🙏📖⚔️🛡️👸
Bro dakes used king james only
@David McEwan... you are correct in choosing the KJV for your bible God Bless you...Dakes is a good bible... but as of now 3 years after your original post.. I am sure that you have seen .. Dakes is better for preparing a Sunday School lesson or memorization of scripture.. than it is for being informative.. .. after studying the Bible many years... I have found that certain study bibles are great devotional bibles..... Matthew Henry... Life Application...etc... some are good informative bibles.. Thompsons Ryries.. Scofield.. Falwell....Zondervan's ... Life in the Spirit....etc..... others are like Dakes.. more helpful in being concise.. and cutting the fat away.. to see what we need to remember about the passage..
@@bonniegrandstaff398 I think Dakes may be available now in the NKJV as well...
@David McEwan..... I know this is probably 3 yrs too late.. but I just noticed your comment regarding the use of Dakes bible.. I use this as well.. off and on... But if you study thru this Bible long enough you need tonbe aware of some flaws in Dakes philosophy..... for 1... there is no proof that the world we live in now is God's second creation... or that "Gap Theory".. which Dake believes... is valid....if one were to believe this.. we would have to believe that death entered the world before Adam.. and Sin..... or that Sin was in a pre-world before Adam... for the wages of sin are death... did Dinosaurs sin?.. why were they destroyed by God.. in a ..pre-Adamic world...?. I know many are using this theory to explain fossils being billions of years old... but the easier belief is that the man made carbon- dating process.. is in error.. what the dating process is citing as billions of years may only be thousands... also point 2.. Dake believes the Job of the book of Job.. was.. the Grandson of Jacob..since the name Job.../Joshuab or something to that effect is mentioned as a decendant of Issachar... Genesis 46:13...I disagree.. there is no proof of this.. and the time frame does Not fit.. besides the geographical location of each in relation to each other being way off... If you adamantly study God's word which I trust you do.. you will find several other flaws in his.. conclusions and assumptions... ..as I said I use Dakes myself.. but that being said.. one using Dakes.. must be careful.. and know how to sift the wheat from the tares... I hope you are...
Dake set the standard for the maximum amount of heresy a single guy can fit into a single volume. i mean just look at the first three endorsements lol come on
@Hondo... by heresy were you refering to his views on segregation etc.. or were you refering to his biblical views such as the Gap theory etc...?...
@Hondo...... I know this is probably 9 months too late.. but I just noticed your comment regarding the use of Dakes bible.. I agree....I use Dakes . off and on..only for the refererences occasionally... if one studies thru this bible they will easily be aware of some flaws in Dakes philosophy..... for 1... there is no proof that the world we live in now is God's second creation... or that "Gap Theory".. which Dake believes... is valid....if one were to believe this.. we would have to believe that death entered the world before Adam.. and Sin..... or that Sin was in a pre-world before Adam... for the wages of sin are death... did Dinosaurs sin?.. why were they destroyed by God.. in a ..pre-Adamic world...?. I know many are using this theory to explain fossils being billions of years old... but the easier belief is that the man made carbon- dating process.. is in error.. what the dating process is citing as billions of years may only be thousands... also point 2.. Dake believes the Job of the book of Job.. was.. the Grandson of Jacob..since the name Job.../Joshuab or something to that effect is mentioned as a decendant of Issachar... Genesis 46:13...I disagree.. there is no proof of this.. and the time frame does Not fit.. besides the geographical location of each in relation to each other being way off... If one adamantly studies God's word.. one will easily find several other flaws in Dake's .. conclusions and assumptions... ..as I said I occasionally use Dakes myself.. but that being said.. one using Dakes.. must be careful.. and know how to sift the wheat from the tares....
@@jeffcarlson3269Dake believed God has a real body and that every time you read about God’s hand or
Mouth you should take that literally. And that’s the three persons of the Godhead each have their own body. This is straight up heresy.
@@a.t.6322
that is as I said.. many of Dake's beliefs were heretical and unfounded...
however...
I think a well grounded Christian should be able to sift thru the notes.. and use ONLY the accurate ones..(ones that support God's word)... Dake's bible can be an invaluable resource... due to his lists... he counts everything...EVERY... word... sin ...question.... chapter....etc...is all listed somewhere in Dake's..
also the concordance has several thousand passage references... I use Dake's.... so I do not have to whip out my 10 lb Stong's concordance on every single word I wish to look up cross passages to..
AGAIN... I would state... one needs to be careful.. with Dake's ... his theology is not always sound.. but.. the work he did.. in coordinating passages. .and helping others to find what they are looking for in God's word is invaluable..
Thanks for all these comments. I was ready to drop the hammer and order this Bible online. I decided against it.
Great reference bible. It is the best out there, hands down. However, Dake’s viw of Sunday as sabbath is way off. Saturday was changed to Sunday in Fourth Century, A.D.. Also, the 10 Commandments are NOT OBSOLETE. Nowhere in scripture does it say they are obsolete.
Have no idea about this study Bible, but I do know that the Sabbath is the only commandment of the 10 commandments not brought over the the N.T.
Sure it's a good practice as a Christian, but it is not a N.T. commandment. The Sabbath was given specifically to the Jews as a SIGN, because the Jews require a sign:
Moreover also I gave them my sabbaths, to be a sign between me and them, that they might know that I am the LORD that sanctify them.
Ezekiel 20:12 KJV
I am the LORD your God; walk in my statutes, and keep my judgments, and do them; and hallow my sabbaths; and they shall be a sign between me and you, that ye may know that I am the LORD your God.
Ezekiel 20:19-20 KJV
Speak thou also unto the children of Israel, saying, Verily my sabbaths ye shall keep: for it is a sign between me and you throughout your generations; that ye may know that I am the LORD that doth sanctify you.
Exodus 31:13 KJV
For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom:
1 Corinthians 1:22 KJV
Sadly - I have to agree. Too many ' bias '. The Word is to SPEAK for itself.
Your information has confirmed my 'quandary'. To buy one or not to buy one. Thank you.
It's a really nice bible. In parts. But what is written here is one mans opinion. So just to bare that in mind.
The best study Bible........
Thank you father God ☺️....... But my sorneam Dake
@priti Dake Christian blessed.... not sure what you were trying to say.. in the last part of your comment,... "but my someam Dake"....?..
A magnifying glass comes in handy.
Being endorsed by those heretics (Hinn, Meyers, etc) should be a warning. Dake was also an arch-heretic, such as teaching God is composed of 9 individuals. There are much better study bibles out there. Being wordy does not make you Godly.
I've GOT to issue a disclaimer here as a pentecostal minister. Finis dake was kicked out of the Assemblies of God and soent time in prison for transpirting a minor across state lines for the purpise of having sex. It was during this time dake wrote his books like God's plan for man which were later adapted for a study bible which is what's being reviewed in this video.
Unfortunately dake also held onto some pretty serious heresies. The very first note in the new testament of this bible says the Jesus did not become the Christ or messiah until he was baptized of John in the jordan river. It seems like a small gheresy until we realize that the old testament prophecies that God himself would be the messiah and at this point we can conclude that dake held to an antichristian heresy known as the cerenthian heresy, and that dake here teaches that Jesus not only became messiah but God the Son, the Son of God. Thus denying the Triune nature of God. Then he contradicts this teaching in ither places.
Furthermore it must be said that while dake affirmed the doctrine of the Trinity with his lips he taught against the doctrine in his theology byy saying each member of the godhead had His own Spirit, Soul, and Body. This is not trinitarianism, but rather tritheism. Tritheism is the belief in 3 gods. Trinitarianism is the belief that there is one being of God who eternally exists as three coeternal, coequal, persons.
This is just the tip of the tip of the iceberg of dake's heresies. His bible is indeed the preferred study bible of charismaniacs, and those who claim to be Pentecostal but are in fact deceived. A good example of a Pentecostal study bible is the Fire Bible, also available as the Life in the Spirit study Bible.
Sting of Truth Yes, thanks for the information good sir. a good approach would be, "eat the meat & spit the bones"
Sting of Truth Another recommended study bible for charismatics/Pentecostals would be Spirit Filled Life Bible
@@allensagalla6340 the spirit filled life bible also has notes from many known heretics from the word of faith movement and is not very pentecostal.
The eat the meat and spit out the bones thing wouldn't be realistic advice for someone who gets a study bible. People get study bibles to help them learn what the bible means so they're relying on the author's for a right interpretation of scripture because they don't know what it means. So they won't know what to eat and what to spit out.
Sting of Truth Oh yes. Yes, thank you very much again good sir for the precise insights, much appreciated
@KrownSkull please notice, they were under the mosaic covenant, nit the christian covenant. You can't excuse sin. God commands all men everywhere to repent.
Ok I need to speak up here. Your actions toward the Bible, box is irreverent. You toss, drop the items with disrespect. This is Gods Word and the company who is providing you with this Bible deserves respect and appreciation. I moved onto a different video to learn about this Bible.
Watch how the Journeyman Messenger treats the Bible during his video.
@Lori Briesacher... interesting that you would comment on his actions regarding the box... cuz I commented to him that I thought the supplemental flyer that came with the bible.. was packaged sloppily.. If I had purchased a bible and the supplimental materials were folded wrong or just thrown in the box with the bible.. I would have been very upset... I have actually bought new bibles.. where the title pages and copyright bages have been crimped.. creased..... this to me is VERY upsetting... that is why I shiver having to buy one even a new bible online... cuz you don't know what you'll get until it's been delivered.. and sending things back are a real inconvenience...
Lori, I thought I was the only one who was thinking that! Thank you for having the courage to say it. God's Word should be handled respectfully at all times.
I have returned a Bible once. But not particularly inconvenient to do. But then I am retired now so that could be a big difference.
Thank you for your reply. 😊❤️. It is great meeting a similar spirit led individual.
Unless you are doctrinally sound in your theology and know what the Bible teaches about salvation, Jews, Eschatology, Eternal Security, etc you will have difficulty with the commentary portion of this Bible, a lot of heresy concerning salvation, keeping saved, who a portion of scripture was written to and if you want to know how to wrongly divide the word of God then you have it here, , why would you want a study Bible that dosent line up with correct doctrine? If your Pentecostal/ Charismatic you will agree with most of his commentary but he says we are not completely saved until the end when we die if we make it to the end of our lives and also he gives a list of requirements for the rapture and much more that Christians have to do to remain saved till the end, let alone what he believes about the Trinity is mind blowing- stay away from this u less you can overlook the heresies and use the rest of the info , the charts in the back are good
Hard to find much good about such a Bible that is wrong about so much. At least it has good looking printing/paper.
@Kyle C... IMO... even so.. I think every Bible Library should at least have one copy of Dakes.. just to look at it once and a while.. that's what I do.. I'll pull it down look through some lists and put it back....
TD Jakes and Drake collaboration bible