Thanks for watching! Check out our road trip MPG results with a 4.30 rear differential on TFLnow: ruclips.net/video/ZOeo1BvQWJA/видео.html and our off-road Tremor gas vs. diesel comparison on TFLoffroad: ruclips.net/video/ugldzNjuWrw/видео.html
Have you guys ever done a milage test comparing tailgate up versus down? They would be interesting to see in addition to doing that test with a cap also.
Based on differential gearing it was able to haul more than this Ford was rated because the Chevy was a 3.73 differential gear versus the Ford 3.55. Don't forget that you're using winter gas and running the heater.
Also the Chevrolet managed that better mpg despite the fact that they used 85 octane (with 10% ethanol) yet for some reason on the Ford they gave it 87 (without ethanol) even though both manufacturers say 87 minimum. I'd imagine if the Chevrolet had gotten the equal fuel it would have been an even larger margin of difference.
That's my problem with the people doing these reviews, they judge trucks on things they don't understand they aren't mechanic's or run fleets and look at downtime numbers. They just blurt out things they don't really understand and everyone walks in lock step based off of it.
@@TFLtruck why did they embargo the 7.3 when it was readily for sale on lots and you bought it yourselves? Just seems like the dinosaur print media or whoever Ford was protecting from being scooped has too much lead time and is just proving why new internet media is eating their lunch.
Not bad, 20 years ago, I used to have a 97 4x4 f250 with the 7.5L, a 5 speed manual and 3.55 gears. Best mpg I ever got was 13.5. This was with 285/75r16 tires. Most of the time 11-12mpg. That engine was rated 245hp and 410tq. So now we get more power and better economy.
Wow. Didn't expect that outcome. Obviously they can't really match the rear gearing between the 2 brands, but 15.1 out of the Ford on the new 10-speed versus 16.0 out of the Chevy on the old 6-speed. That's an impressive finish for Chevy's new 6.6.
This channel has always been a wee bit biased towards GM. All these comments talking about fuel economy are quite annoying. A Toyota Prius gets better gas mileage than almost anything. But that’s the only thing it does better.
I do agree that the constant fuel mileage comments can get annoying, especially from private owners that should be fully aware of the cost to operate a full size truck. But given that the 7.3 is intended to be a reliable and economical motor for commercial and fleet operators, grading it heavily on its fuel economy is warranted. I don't think the ratings were terrible given the testing conditions and elevation. But I was expecting it to get a little closer to the Chevys numbers.
@@Bmc1025 Tow rating, at least to me, seem to vary a lot truck to truck even within the same models. I'll say this much, its getting better mileage than the Ecoboost F-150 I used to own. Loved that truck and the power as much as it loved gas
Si Raff I bought the truck new,and was going on the Toyota reliability. And that has proved true. If I had to buy a new truck it would probably be a Toyota. I worked at a local Chevy dealer until just recently, and saw a lot of issues with the new Chevy’s. The more bells and whistles, the more problems.
The 7.3 is kind of falling short in every category for me. Less torque than I expected, less fuel efficientcy than I expected so far. The Chevy is actually doing quite well considering its using a 6 speed.
Do you realize that they did that to get an "out-of-the gate" number, right? People are going to be modifying the heck out of these monsters anyway. I am rare, I love Ford and Chevy and I feel like they make each other greater. I am more of a Ford dude, but I am impressed with RAM's 6.4 HEMI as well. What a trio, 6.4, 6.6, 7.3 like the good old days of big power.
Christopher Williams 6.4 Hemi is much more appealing with its new 8 speed. The old 66RFE held it back quite a bit not even having a true 6 speed ratio spread.
They tested the Tremor on the Dyno, not a good choice for a true dyno test. They would have been better off testing the one in this video on the dyno. The 10 speed is better suited to the 3.55 gearing than the 4.10 or whatever it was on the Tremor. When you look at the dyno on the 6.7 with the 10 speed and 3.55 gears the numbers were off the chart.
Interesting result. The result is consistent with what I would expect. Chevy does a very good job of squeezing efficiency out of their vehicles. However, I would not let a relatively small (really within the margin of error) difference in fuel economy be the deciding factor between these two trucks. There are many other considerations in my opinion. Either vehicle would be a good choice and I think that personal preference in styling and design will likely be big factors in peoples purchasing choices.
It is pretty tough to split mpg tests over several days. Each leg of tests, on both trucks, should be done under near identical ambient conditions, meaning that each leg should be performed at nearly same time on same day. Temperature, atmospheric pressure, humidity, wind and fuel mix all play a role.
Thank you, glad I am not the only one that seen that. It is harder for a large truck to push through cold air. I noticed that they was bundled up when testing the f250
With my 06 duramax dually towing a 31k lb trailer of hay I got 9.8 mpg on a 77 mile trip with several decent sized hills. And I get about 15 mpg on the same loop with a 15k lb stock trailer. So this test surprised me with how awful the gas mileage is with these modern gas engines towing a trailer
What concerns me is longevity on these 8 and 10 speeds, they do a lot more shifting especially pulling or driving in the hills. Maybe I'm wrong but my basic knowledge on transmissions make me thing more shifting= more wear and potentially more heat?
I have not noticed that. From a 4spd to a 10 spd, 5.4 to a 3.5 EB, the newer truck does stay in 8th most of my towing trips, but the power difference in the engines allows it to stay put, where the 5.4 would kick to 3rd and rev to 4k. Haven't needed the 3.5 up that high yet.
$53,000 for any pickup truck is ridiculous and gluttonous. The rate that pickup truck prices have risen is absolutely crazy. I hope someone takes a serious look at this... It's right in line of paying $100 for sliced up jeans...
I agree....I bought my 15 Duramax ccsb for 51k out the door in Feb of 2015 it was 63k sticker....it was a bit high at the time, but when I see a similarly equipped truck today is close to 80k sticker.....yes, it's glutinous or as some might say, capitalism/ supply/ demand. Definitely not inflation at work. No way can I grabbed a LTZ today in the 50k range...it will correct.
I agree 100%. I personally don't need a brand new vehicle . If I had the money for a diesel or gas hd truck I'd go between 2005 to 2010 if I could swing it. 50,000 f150's I mean really . Not knocking Ford btw they're all doing it now.
Yeah they are a lot of money but if you count in inflation even my 2001 F150 sticker prices was just under 32k new and adjusted for inflation its 48k in 2019 money. Considering all the technology and advances it's really not that bad, it's the cost of living and wages that have not kept up with cost of things.
Depending upon the wind - that can really kill mileage. My F350 with a camper averages 12.3 with no wind. On a windy day the mileage can go as low as 9.5 MPG. You need to re-run the test on a day with no wind if you can do that.
Gives you allot more range when you need it. My 2014 Sierra 1500 has only 26 gal and I wish it had 30 or more. I've taken it to places in Northern Canada with long distances between fuel stops. Which makes me wonder. How big was the fuel tank on the Chevy they tested? All that extra fuel weight might account for the difference in fuel economy.
But whats it real world power and MPG numbers once the limp mode comes on due to whatever $1000+ emissions component of the week going out, since that's pretty much how every diesel I have seen built in the last nearing 10 years actually spends most of it life opperatiing running as? OH, wait! It's not a diesel so it doesn't have that problem! :D
That's odd. What octane fuel is he using and does he haul stuff in the back or pull a trailer? Driving short distance lowers mpg's as well like in my '13 F150 with a 5.0L. I drive a 2 mile round trip 5 day's a week and 20 mile round trip on Sunday. My mileage is 7.2 mpg.
Since it’s mostly a freeway loop, the weight had less to do with economy than the winds and temps. The comparison to the GM at this point is purely anecdotal. Need same trailer and load with same atmospherics to get a reasonable comparison.
You can't compare tests from different times of year. You need to take into account winter fuel and summer fuel blends. Also air temperature will affect fuel milage. To compare they need to be tested at the same time under the same conditions with the same fuel.
Agreed. A truer test would have been them running side by side at the same time, pulling the same weight(GCVW), and then compare. Considering both test runs of the F250 were into the wind accounts for something as well as the winter blend fuel.
@@wiks101 Did they have the same with the other truck? If not, then not a true comparison. Besides, a head wind can really affect MPG more than a tail wind, so it wont really cancel it out unless the tail wind is at least 10 MPH more.
I just bought a '19 F350 with the 6.2 and 4.30s, so far I love it the only complaint is the god awful mileage. Coming from a 2005 Cummins towing on the highway leaves something to be desired but anything under 50/55 I think the 6.2 is as good if not better than the 6 speed common rail.
Yeah it took me some time gettin use to a gas motor but I’ve had mine for 5 years now and it’s been the best vehicle I’ve ever owned. It’s got 149000 miles on it and I pull constantly. I’m off road a lot with me job to. I’ve put on 1 front axle , battery. And brakes. Other than that change the oil ($26) and that’s it.
I love Ford but their engines are over complicated and break down more easily. Chevy is smart, small block pushrod v8’s will never die as long as they keep it simple.
The 6.6l l8t they tested here was actually not a LS engine. They are a fifth generation sbc like the 6.2l, but are stroked to 6.6l. So they are in the new "LT" engine family.
I have watched many videos with truck comparisons. There are the Ford Guys, Dodge guys, and the Chevy men! When trucks come off of the showroom floors, stuff works. After 100,000 miles, let me see which trucks are still performing at a satisfactory level. New trucks have wat to many bells and whistle gadgets and that leads to more failures. I live in a harsh winter climate 5 months out of the year in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Mechanical door steps, multi use tailgates, auto tailgates, low profile wheels, fancy chrome trim, and lady features! All that stuff fails at -10 and in deep snow with a 100 Libs of ice stuck to the truck. Ford has tons of great tech! Dodge plenty of power with a Yugo transmission! And the Chevy with a check engine light. I got 240,000 on my 02 Chevy Avalanche and it lasted 17 years before I sold it. I bought a 14 Chevy WT 1500 with 100,000 and it works great. Not a lot of bells and whistles, but practical. I just want a rust proof truck, which the manufacturers can make but they won’t.
I loved the longevity of my old 6.0 gas in the 2500HD I had but the 6.2 gas in my current F-250 pulls much stronger. I wished GM wouldn't have waited so long to upgrade the 6.0
Air temperature also makes quite a bit of difference in MPG comparisons. I used to have a Ford extended E-350 with a V-10. In cold weather (20 degrees F) it'd get about 13 MPG with about 3500# of cargo. In 70 degree weather, it'd be up to 16 MPG. If your comparing MPG you have to keep the conditions the same as possible. Also the MPG with a gas engine may be lower, but cost of maintenance and intital cost compared to a diesel is also lower. I've got a diesel that I pull my 5th wheel camper with and I love it, but I don't think you ever get you money back. Thank you for all of your great tests.
If you did that’s amazing. Those numbers sound quite a bit over shot though. Are you sure you did the math right? The V-10s were said to be around 10mpg empty and drop when hauling weren’t they?
My 7.3 wouldn’t get 15 mpg if you dropped it out of an airplane. Running around out in the pasture driving to town averages about 9 to 10 miles a gallon Drove it the other day on the open road with the cruise set at 68 miles an hour averaged about 13.1 with a 355. Still a heck of a lot better than my old 454. Technology has come along ways.
Bill you gotta remember that these engines have almost twice the output and the trucks weigh 30 percent more than the old ones. I understand what you are getting at though.
You must have the E4OD and 3.73 gears. I had a similar F-250 (regular cab long box, nothing huge) with the 460, C6, and 4.10s and it had a hard time getting double-digit MPGs. I think the best I ever did was around 12 but that's no Overdrive and big gears in the rear end. It would pull anything you wanted it to but sucked gas down. The 460 would do 300k+ miles no trouble, I know plenty of people who used to use them pulling race cars and campers cross-country.
OFFRD I’ve got a ‘01 2500hd with the 8.1 and it doesn’t really go through oil real fast but I do get about 8mpg empty 😂😂. But that’s life, I didn’t buy the big block for mpg lol
benjaminwayneb built in the early 2000’s there bud. So what it has 100hp less, makes more torque and I can guarantee it’s a hell of a lot more reliable than this not really that impressive 7.3 gas.
I don't think more gears is always a good thing. I recall on another Gauntlet test one of the two trucks tested had more gears and it kept upshifting and taking the engine out of the power zone. Then the engine would begin to strain and the truck would downshift. It cycled like this the whole way up the mountain...very annoying if I recall. That said, the Ford has good torque so it may not be an issue.
There is a good video from bad tree productions on one of their trucks. Look it up. They did a Holley sniper throttle body with the factory efi on the 460. Actually worked really well. I think they were around 15/16mpg on it. And a considerable power gain
I had a2500 Ram power wagon and I loved the engine in it, it was a 6.4 gas and it would do anything that I needed it to do. Love love love the power wagon
Some of trucks are hitting 10+ loaded now. Crazy. Our v10 school buses get 7.5 even with all the stops go and idle time. And 8.5 with Cummins. Though the diesels are all being phased out. Too slow, slow heat, and way more maintenance cost. Plus the noise/vibration. The gassers are so much nicer to drive.
What I can’t figure out is why they used 85 octane on the Chevy and 87 octane on the ford. Is their bias only against GM. Do both of these trucks on the same day WITH THE SAME FUEL.
SMiller5488 maybe they used higher octane in the ford this time in hopes it doesn’t break down going up the Ike like the previous model did last year 🤷♂️😂😂
@@tristanhipps604 Doesn't make a big enough difference compared to conditions, the conditions of the area matters way more then the weight, have you ever been to a drag strip before ? Those that have been like myself can tell you that conditions really do matter, alot more then what the car is hauling. It can have tons of HP but if it can't put it all to the ground or use it efficiently then there is no point.
I just bought a 2019 ram 3500 6.4 hemi standard cab long bed 4x4. 410 rear. Left nj with 900 miles on the truck. Drove to SW Florida towing 7000lbs. Keeping@ 65 mph and tire pressure at 80psi. I got 12.0 mpg. Very impressed the way it towed and how the transmission acted. I'm a Cummings diesel guy and again I was very impressed...
@@sashashpiruk4865 my dad has a 2014 3500 and he says it's the biggest piece of trash, it's been to the dealer multiple times per month and now the dealer doesn't want to work on his truck anymore, he was probably just unlucky with his truck
@@natetoland7537 I'm sorry to hear that sir. I use to be a die hard Ford guy. But since the 6.0 and 6.4 diesel problems I went Cummings and Rams. I've had nothing but good luck with them. I use them for my transport business and snow plowing. I'm not a fan boy. Just have good luck.
Sasha Shpiruk - Cummins, Cummins. No g in there,,,,, hahaha. I have heard the same good reports about the Ram Diesels in the Ranching industry as well. All the diesel trucks are good with today’s engines, forgetting the past, but the most loyal followers seem to be Ram! Nice to hear from someone who really uses them and not a mall crawler. (Which I have become since retiring, I used all Ford because I’m cheap, but I didn’t have any problems since 2000. One F350 gas in there, it was a giant pig on fuel.) I have owned well over 100 trucks in my life but I’m done with first hand knowledge of work trucks as of last year. Maybe I will see more of your comments!! Stay safe out there, Eh.
@Bo Brother yeah, i tow a large enclosed trailer regularly. and even with the same truck/trailer combo we never get the same gas mileage. it will always vary with the wind; even cross-winds have a huge effect. something else we have learned is that similar size trucks with comparable power will get vary similar mileage when towing, it's not even noticeable if it has a 6spd, 8spd, or 10spd, although more gears will improve acceleration when loaded heavy.
Glad to see you are finally able to do mileage for the 7.3. Not real bad mileage for that big monster of an engine. Thanks for sharing Andre and Kent enjoyed the review.
So your comparing a test where you wore a t-shirt to one that you have snow on the ground. 👌👌👌 because cold weather doesn't affect mpg at all. Mpg in winter is 12-22% difference. Get the chev back out and try again. Air density change etc. Cant compare yet.
@@UvidCo less energy efficient in winter. Only electric makes more power and not electric cars either thanks to our battery tech. Does make more power, just takes more fuel.
lol it's not they're in the jet stream! Wind conditions can change quickly and dramatically. Besides, I doubt they were going in a straight line the whole time.
ChicagoSox give your head a shake! I could run that Chevy on 3 different runs on different days of the week and I bet I would get different MPG results each time. Same for the Ford, that’s what happens when you have real world testing. And I hate to tell ya, but that Ford when properly equipped can tow and hall more than that Chevy.
Matt S the Ford can definitely tow, but after watching these videos for a few years they always say the result is the result due to real world testing. This is the first time I’ve seen them make an excuse for the Ford
So much for the 10 speed giving it an edge... Also caught that they said the truck floated from 7 th gear to overdrive and back a lot. Maybe that's why GM kept the old 6 speed. These trucks were built for reliability first after all. I'm sure they are all making less power than they could too for reliability purposes.
I factor in the differential gear. That Chevy test was a 3.73 rear end. This Ford is running on winter gas with probably the heater running and on 3.55 gearing which is crazy for pulling this much weight.
@@Welcometofacsistube um GM 6.0 liter? that thing built like a tank. My uncle had a work truck with it and it had 350k miles on it and still was going strong.
Idk why people seem to think 15mpg isnt a great number for a big block 3/4 pick up. That's freaking good!!!! My half ton with a 5.0 small block only gets about 10mpg. 12 if theres no headwind. Like what do yall expect it to get? 23mpg? 30mpg?
My 01 Chevy 1500hd gets 11.5 mpg every fill up for over two years now. I think that’s excellent the 7.3 did 15 mpg unloaded. That’s an extra 150 miles out of a tank which will add up quick. These trucks are tremendously out of my price range as I’m not going to spend 60 grand cash on a truck that I’ll destroy in less then three years. The 2010 Nissan frontier looks like my best option as I can get a 6 speed manual and they don’t have many issues. I’m glad I’m matured at 26 and moving past the diesel life. A lot of unnecessary expenses for no reason with diesels plus you can’t even register them once you make them reliable.
I think that's one of the biggest problems in their test, they do it at speed. Most people pulling that heavy of a load in a gas (hell even in a diesel) would be 60-65mph for safety and control of the load. Also the Chevy was done in summer and lite winds, the poor Ford got winter fuel (packed with additives and maxed on Ethanol) and high winds. I can tell you all about how high winds effects MPG, I live on the South Texas Coast. We see 20mph + winds very regularly, my 2010 Tundra unloaded driving into that high wind will make 8-9mpg @60mph and 5-6mpg @75mph. But if we get a very calm day of wind, I get 20.8mpg @60mph and 16-17mpg @75mph. Best I have very got was 24.276mpg @60mph with at least a 25mph wind at my back on a trip up to San Antonio. My combined over the 2 years I've had the truck is 13.295mpg, that's about a 35% highway and 65% city driving. Right now on winter blend I'm pulling 10.8-11.9mpg in the city around here, in summer months I get 12.7-14mpg in the city (summer fuel here has almost no ethanol at all, too hot for it to stay in the tanks). So fuel is a big play just as wind is.
survivalguy, my 6.0 powerstroke brother!! Yeah, towing my 5,500 lb camper, I run 65 MPH max. I own an 04 F250 6.0. I don't see how these people run 75-80 MPH safely!
@@TheVenom8343 to answer your question ive been wrencing on a fleet of over 800 super duties in the harshest environment known to man ( the oilsands in northern canada ) since 2002 and can say they have gotten WAY more capable over the years , multiple brake upgrades, fully boxed frames, and way more tech as far as electronics (trailer anti sway , advancetrac etc..) the 2020's ride is far more capable then the 2002's (but i still like the simplicity of my 2009 v-10 ... )
Just to put things in perspective, my 454 BBC with an NP 4500 gets 8.2 MPG on the open road, and 7.9 in town. So, your 15 and 16 MPG sound pretty good to me. --- Thanks for the great upload. ---
I stop for gas about every 250 miles or so in my F-250, and 250-300 miles in my Impreza. Unless the Mrs is coming along, then we're stopping every 1-1.5 hours for a pee break and might as well top off the tank while we're stopped.
@@waterloo123100 idk I like my 6spd on my 2019 I wouldn't want any more than 6 gears on a heavy duty truck. My 06 duramax I believe had 4 and it was a tank
Cowboy Texas Is your truck a Ford or a Gm? We actually like the Ford 6 speed autos at my transmission shop. They have a lot less problems then the Gm version. But we prefer the 4 speed because of the simplicity and how light they are. Their truly the best if you plan on working them hard.
Finally! We have results! Nice vid guys. Imo, the ford could do better, a couple examples on youtube were achieving much better gas mileage but, the real world varies based on altitude, temperature, how flat the road is, etc Depending on where people live, their numbers can be better or they can be worse, im rootin tootin for the the big block Ferd!
This is pretty simple here folks GMC 6.2 l is a 377 cubic inch and Ford 7.3 445 cubic inch you can't compare the gas mileage of a 377 to a 445 just like back in the day trying to compare a 454 Big block to a 350 Chevy gas mileage bigger cubic inch motors of course. Worse gas mileage on this test the Ford for having a much bigger cubic inch motor did not get a dramatically worse MPG rating so I would definitely stick with a Ford.
Your results are pretty much exactly what I expected; comparable but with the 6.6L doing a bit better. Direct injection is simply better from a pure power and efficiency standpoint.
@@A_Man_Of_Culture_ The Ethanol even though its only 10% does effect economy. It won't effect it much but there is still an effect i got an 07 truck that is flex fuel, its reg gas vs e85 numbers are difference of i think was 20% loss using e85. Its only 10% in this case but still gonna hurt a small bit in fords favor.
I caught that also i thought it was just me. They did use 85 .When they did that I was said ewww no. So the chevy gets better mpg on cheaper gas go figure .Way to go Chevy !
@@paul.s9677 The Chevy was tested with warm weather fuel vs cold weather fuel for the Ford. 87 octane helps compensate for worse quality fuel and make the test more equal.
You had Winter blend fuel in the 7.3 which gives worse MPG. When you tested the Chevy I think you were still in the Summer blend. Big difference in MPG with the two blends.
xelvic congrats welcome to real world testing. You get whatever gas they put in the pumps when you drive. They don’t have control over when they receive the trucks either
It's all physics when it comes to towing . Every truck is going to get similar mpg. What's more important in my opinion is brake distances, merge lane acceleration and overall handling.
I wasn't really referring to 20 year old trucks. Even so whatever truck your using to tow 14K pounds with, it just takes that much gas (energy to move it). Yes technology has changed and i'm not arguing that. If you took a 20 year old truck and strapped 14K trailer to it, I'd bet it would still get similar mileage towing as the new ones,.. single digit mpg. Technology or not it just takes fuel, the new ones of course do tow better. So yes a 20 year old truck would not get anywhere near the same mileage empty if that is your point, however I said when towing, not overall mpg.
My 2002 F250 with the 5.4 gasser can get 16+ mpg in the summer, and handle a 12,000 lb GVWR with plow and sander in the winter. It’s time to upgrade, but $53k is a tough pill to swallow.
Not true. Different fuel systems and ignition systems can improve the energy lost by the fuel consumption of the engine. The modern engine is still only about 30% efficient. The rest of the gasoline is lost in the form of heat. Being able to capture more energy and use the gasoline more efficiently is constantly improving.
Not a fair comparison, summers are warmer, have calmer winds, and have less ethanol added, which increase fuel efficiency. Winter cold forces the engine to work harder to stay warm, plus higher ethanol is added in addition to other additives to "improve" fuel economy (doesn't really), and wind factors also puts more resistance against the vehicle. The fact that the Ford only got 1.3mpg less then the Chevy while under more extreme conditions says the Ford is actually better. And if my truck's performance record is anything to go off of (18 summer highway, 15 winter highway), the Ford's summer performance would be around 7-9mpg if under the same conditions as the Chevy was.
Great comparison and you're the only one doing doing towing tests. Like to see you add coolant temp and EGT to your tests. EGT is usually a diesel thing but towing it would be interesting to see how gas exgdust temps under load.
EGT matters on turbocharged engines because of the boost. EGT is not an issue on naturally aspirated engines, even when towing heavy uphill. Engine oil & trans. oil temps are.
Here’s my 1.5 yr. ownership experience with the 2020 Chevy 2500 experience below. Thanks guys for your test reviews of this and the Chevy. And for your honest reactions that I noticed Andre seemed to hope the Ford Godzilla would do better than the Chevy especially since the Chevy pulled a heavier trailer. I’ve sensed from other videos how Andre likes the “Godzilla” name and all. To keep this peaceful, both essentially get within 1 mpg of each other, how’s that? PS, I own my 2020 Chevy 6.6L gasser and … love it thus far. I get 17-18 mpg US on Hwy and 14-15 city and worse for both in winter. I Love the 82” long standard bed, the front & rear side steps (plus the optional side mounted Bed Storage Boxes leaving 4 ft. Width in my box yet lots of storage = Awesome!!!) direct fuel injection engine with the JD Power proven reliability and beefed up 6L90 transmission for this new 6.6L. Because I live in an area that has +6 months of real winter, I appreciate the AutoTrac transfer case for more secure winter driving.
Just want to say you guys do an amazing job all the time! For future comparison videos, would it be possible to film both trucks on the same day with Mr Truck in the other vehicle to eliminate variables like the wind and weather conditions if it could be done logisticly.
My 2017 6.2 with a 6 speed does much better - I will stick with the 6.2. Not much difference in HP and Torque. Unloaded and stock, I get 17 mpg through the mountains of NC.
Ideally, the GM and the Ford could have been tested on the same day (or even at the same time, for the unloaded test!) in order to eliminate weather/wind as a variable, but we (unfortunately) don't live in an ideal world. I admit to being pretty intrigued by the new 7.3L Ford gasser, but it is REALLY difficult to compete with GM on OHV gas V8s... that has been their bread and butter for YEARS, with no forays into OHC architecture, etc... to take engineering dollars away from the OHC V8 program(s).
I don't think it's difficult for Ford to compete with it.. GM is now in 3rd place for truck sales, behind even Ram. Ford is still the only manufacturer that makes their own engine, transmission, and axles. Also the 7.3 torque curve is superior to the 6.6 and has forged internals- forged crankshaft. The Silverado is still using a 6 speed on their gas v8...
@@CortJohnson please explain the logic in how using two truck brands with double the overhead for manufacturing that barely leads Ford when combined is somehow meaningful... lmfao IDK why some fanboys are so desperate to claim #1 with an obscure and meaningless calculation. GM can't sell 1 pickup line anywhere close to F-series or Ram.
DocTube ..The HD 10 speed in the F250/350 is not the same as the Allison 10 speed in the Silverado 2500/3500 Duramax. The 1/2 ton trucks do share the GM/Ford joint venture light duty 10 speed transmission but they went in separate directions for the HD's.
rlhmarines True. I know they worked on the 10 speed together for the half ton truck and suv. I assume the HD 10 speed is based on the lighter duty 10 speed but with upgraded components. Fun fact: GM has built Allison transmissions for years, GM sends the transmission to Allison to have it validated to meet their standards and receive the Allison branding. www.tfltruck.com/2018/12/2020-chevy-silverado-hd-allison-transmission/
Great video, but I believe most people that are looking at super duty gas trucks are NOT pulling 14,500 lbs-16,000 lbs. Trailers. Most trailers are in the vicinity of 8,000-10,000 lbs. At the heavies, maybe 12,000. I understand what you guys are trying to prove by testing the towing claims of these manufacturers. But we would love to see some realistic tow trailers. Thank you guys, you guys have some great videos!!!
As others have mentioned, what considerations were made for the winter blend fuel? Also, can you explain why you used 14,500 (trailer weight) with the Ford but 16,000 with the Chevy?
Maybe to stack he deck...they paid for a Ford. Pretty sure the lower octane and Ethanol more than made up for winter blend, and oh....never mind the 10% lighter trailer
These are max tow fuel economy test. Every video tfl does has glaring inconsistency between trucks. But so does everyone driving them too. Think of this as what a truck your thinking of owning does.
The Chevy is a 6.6L and the Ford is a 7.3L your kind of stupid the bigger the displacement the more gas you use I’d argue the ford is doing better than the Chevy considering the ford has 45 more cubic inches
@@zb6618 you're in first gear for about 2 seconds. More gears doesn't equal more mpg. More gears help when towing up and down grades by being able to keep the engine exactly at it's peak power because the gears are closer together. 3.55 gears are still 3.55 gears at highway speeds
cody roland the 10 speed keeps it at the ideal ratio after first gear, so it pretty much doesn’t matter what the rear gear ratio is because the 10 speed makes it so that it has the same ratio from the engine to the rear end
Does both engines have the fuel management system? Say if the Ford doesn't but the chevy does, that could be the reason 🤔, but in reality 1 mpg isn't much of a difference, especially considering the big 1 liter difference in motors, well technically, .7, but just a thought. Thanks great video as usual 👍🏼
Nice video guys. One thing I notice when checking gas mileage on my vehicles over the years, is that ambient temperature and wind can make a huge difference. My driving usually takes through Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee so I often see major temperature swings. As the temp goes down so does my mileage. I would really like to see the F-250 test on a warmer day. Enjoy your videos and commentary.
As long as you're not dealing with too many hills, then you won't be worrying about 7-10. My buddy is a mechanic and he's probably 75% reliable which I can say more for some people.
After having a F-150 with the 10 speed and towing 6200 pounds, and trying to tow that same 6200 pounds with a 6-speed F-150, I will take the 10 speed ALL DAY LONG. Period.
This was good to watch but if you test brands, test on same day with same trailer with identical rear gears. I know a lot of viewers that are saying this same thing. Might be different results
Oscar Mayer they do their best, but get what they get when they can. Gives you an idea though based on the consistent loop. It’s not like you’re going to see a 5-10 mpg variance.
THE FORD HAD A HEAD WIND WHICH MAKES A BIG DIFFERENCE. AND THE FORD ENGINE IS BIGGER AND MORE POWERFUL. 6.2 VS 7.3. DO THE MATH, THE FORD GETS BETTER FUEL ECONOMY PER LITER OF ENGINE SIZE. I DID THE MATH.
@@jamesnm21 That person were probably lying or mixed up, it was the Ford who got the ethanol mix and additives and was driving in cold winter with high wind. The Chevy was in summer with little wind.
Ford suspension is shit. My F-350 squats terribly. Rides very smooth without a load but once a load is on it rides like crap! Best heavy duty truck I road in with a load is the RAM
This test wasn't fair and the Chevy still won, the new GODZILLA f250 towed less weight, had more fuel efficient gearing and they gave the f250 87 while the Chevy got 85 octane and the Chevy still did better AND the Chevy is $5k cheaper. That new 6.6 looks pretty impressive
Thanks for watching! Check out our road trip MPG results with a 4.30 rear differential on TFLnow: ruclips.net/video/ZOeo1BvQWJA/видео.html and our off-road Tremor gas vs. diesel comparison on TFLoffroad: ruclips.net/video/ugldzNjuWrw/видео.html
The Fast Lane Truck Did Ford lower the ride height on the 2020 super duties?
@@buildriteconstruction2690 yes, I believe I saw that they did. Something like an 1" in the front and 1 1/4" in the back.
Have you guys ever done a milage test comparing tailgate up versus down? They would be interesting to see in addition to doing that test with a cap also.
cody grillaert MythBusters did the tailgate up or down test.
Leave the tailgate up for better mpg
@@andrewhannah8015 I know they did, I'd like to see TFL do it and introduce a cap to the comparison.
That amazes me, these new heavy-duty trucks get better fuel economy than my 2004 hemi 1500, technology has come a long way in 16 years.
bearatts Was thinking the same thing! My 2004 Hemi 1500 got 15 empty
Yeah my 6.2 Silverado gets 14 combined average per tank of mixed use. Best was 18 on the interstate with a good tail wind.
Not very hard to beat a Dodge hemi with anything
My 2015 Hemi on the other hand got 21.5 on a long flat trip at 60-65mph
Have the exact same truck. Hemi 04. 240k miles now
Smaller engine Chevy with less geared six speed still did better, despite a slightly heavier trailer... Now that's impressive.
Yeah I like how he added at the end how the Chevy trailer was heavier.
Based on differential gearing it was able to haul more than this Ford was rated because the Chevy was a 3.73 differential gear versus the Ford 3.55. Don't forget that you're using winter gas and running the heater.
Cup & Cone gm is weaker there fore not as much fuel
Also the Chevrolet managed that better mpg despite the fact that they used 85 octane (with 10% ethanol) yet for some reason on the Ford they gave it 87 (without ethanol) even though both manufacturers say 87 minimum. I'd imagine if the Chevrolet had gotten the equal fuel it would have been an even larger margin of difference.
Matthew Robertson The heat won’t affect fuel economy unless the defrost is on, fuel type maybe, weather conditions for sure and gearing as well.
If port injection is "old school" I guess carbureted is "prehistoric".
The tech manuals for carburetors are either chiseled in stone tablets or cave paintings. Lol
That's my problem with the people doing these reviews, they judge trucks on things they don't understand they aren't mechanic's or run fleets and look at downtime numbers. They just blurt out things they don't really understand and everyone walks in lock step based off of it.
That's a fair categorization. And throttle body injection would be "ancient"
When towing.
Ford 7.3 = 5.65mpg
Chevy 6.5 = 6.9
Unloaded
Chevy = 16.0 mpg
Ford = 15.1
@Dylan Church Chevy has the new 6.6L gas V8.
Add: yes 6.6L not 6.0 or 6.5
Finally the Embargo is over!! Can't wait to see more videos about this truck! Keep up the consistent hard work TFL!!
5 star will have their tuned numbers soon.
We will publish more Super Duty videos soon.
@@TFLtruck why did they embargo the 7.3 when it was readily for sale on lots and you bought it yourselves? Just seems like the dinosaur print media or whoever Ford was protecting from being scooped has too much lead time and is just proving why new internet media is eating their lunch.
@@TFLtruck when will you post the Ike Gauntlet videos for the f250 7.3?
Not bad, 20 years ago, I used to have a 97 4x4 f250 with the 7.5L, a 5 speed manual and 3.55 gears. Best mpg I ever got was 13.5. This was with 285/75r16 tires. Most of the time 11-12mpg. That engine was rated 245hp and 410tq. So now we get more power and better economy.
I've got one with 4.10 gears, 5 speed, stock tire size and it's getting between 10 and 12 usually...
Wow. Didn't expect that outcome. Obviously they can't really match the rear gearing between the 2 brands, but 15.1 out of the Ford on the new 10-speed versus 16.0 out of the Chevy on the old 6-speed. That's an impressive finish for Chevy's new 6.6.
I mean the 350 has a 3.73
They should've tested these two with the same trailer, on the same day. Guess we'll see how it does on the ike gauntlet.
Exactly, this video is utterly pointless if they didn't do it in the same day, same trailer, etc.
This channel has always been a wee bit biased towards GM. All these comments talking about fuel economy are quite annoying. A Toyota Prius gets better gas mileage than almost anything. But that’s the only thing it does better.
I am a diehard GM guy and I agree. I still see the GM doing better MPG but I think it would have been close enough it wouldn't be a selling point.
I do agree that the constant fuel mileage comments can get annoying, especially from private owners that should be fully aware of the cost to operate a full size truck. But given that the 7.3 is intended to be a reliable and economical motor for commercial and fleet operators, grading it heavily on its fuel economy is warranted. I don't think the ratings were terrible given the testing conditions and elevation. But I was expecting it to get a little closer to the Chevys numbers.
@@Bmc1025 Tow rating, at least to me, seem to vary a lot truck to truck even within the same models. I'll say this much, its getting better mileage than the Ecoboost F-150 I used to own. Loved that truck and the power as much as it loved gas
Both of them get better empty mpg’s than my ‘05 Tundra! But it’s paid for and suits my need.
I was gonna say the same about my 2012 4.6l tundra... I've been getting 13.5mpg
The gearing on those trucks makes them burn more fuel than you would expect.
Si Raff I bought the truck new,and was going on the Toyota reliability. And that has proved true. If I had to buy a new truck it would probably be a Toyota. I worked at a local Chevy dealer until just recently, and saw a lot of issues with the new Chevy’s. The more bells and whistles, the more problems.
A 2019 tundra probably won't be able to get any better gas mileage either.
Shaun Beach that’s true. Toyota needs to get the mpg’s up.
The 7.3 is kind of falling short in every category for me. Less torque than I expected, less fuel efficientcy than I expected so far. The Chevy is actually doing quite well considering its using a 6 speed.
I agree. I was hoping the MPG would be a little better with a 10 speed.
Do you realize that they did that to get an "out-of-the gate" number, right? People are going to be modifying the heck out of these monsters anyway. I am rare, I love Ford and Chevy and I feel like they make each other greater. I am more of a Ford dude, but I am impressed with RAM's 6.4 HEMI as well. What a trio, 6.4, 6.6, 7.3 like the good old days of big power.
Christopher Williams 6.4 Hemi is much more appealing with its new 8 speed. The old 66RFE held it back quite a bit not even having a true 6 speed ratio spread.
They tested the Tremor on the Dyno, not a good choice for a true dyno test. They would have been better off testing the one in this video on the dyno. The 10 speed is better suited to the 3.55 gearing than the 4.10 or whatever it was on the Tremor. When you look at the dyno on the 6.7 with the 10 speed and 3.55 gears the numbers were off the chart.
@@jamespenner1412 In nearly all the Ikes the Chevy out performs in the HD .
Interesting result. The result is consistent with what I would expect. Chevy does a very good job of squeezing efficiency out of their vehicles. However, I would not let a relatively small (really within the margin of error) difference in fuel economy be the deciding factor between these two trucks. There are many other considerations in my opinion. Either vehicle would be a good choice and I think that personal preference in styling and design will likely be big factors in peoples purchasing choices.
It is pretty tough to split mpg tests over several days. Each leg of tests, on both trucks, should be done under near identical ambient conditions, meaning that each leg should be performed at nearly same time on same day. Temperature, atmospheric pressure, humidity, wind and fuel mix all play a role.
Thank you, glad I am not the only one that seen that. It is harder for a large truck to push through cold air. I noticed that they was bundled up when testing the f250
Love Ford bringing big displacement back but I'm with Andre on this one, I expected better.
I have always said it, ford’s numbers on paper are always the best, but in real world everything changes
These MPG numbers just make me want to hold on to my 1996 Cummins 12v even more! Lol
What's your mpgs?
With my 06 duramax dually towing a 31k lb trailer of hay I got 9.8 mpg on a 77 mile trip with several decent sized hills. And I get about 15 mpg on the same loop with a 15k lb stock trailer. So this test surprised me with how awful the gas mileage is with these modern gas engines towing a trailer
MPG will get better as they break in for sure lol
Hey me too!! With the 4x4, 5 speed 3.50 gears I get 16 city and 20.3 highway unloaded at 65 mph! What in the world is ford doing?!
@@happydoggs probably not by much.
What concerns me is longevity on these 8 and 10 speeds, they do a lot more shifting especially pulling or driving in the hills. Maybe I'm wrong but my basic knowledge on transmissions make me thing more shifting= more wear and potentially more heat?
I have not noticed that. From a 4spd to a 10 spd, 5.4 to a 3.5 EB, the newer truck does stay in 8th most of my towing trips, but the power difference in the engines allows it to stay put, where the 5.4 would kick to 3rd and rev to 4k. Haven't needed the 3.5 up that high yet.
$53,000 for any pickup truck is ridiculous and gluttonous. The rate that pickup truck prices have risen is absolutely crazy. I hope someone takes a serious look at this... It's right in line of paying $100 for sliced up jeans...
I agree....I bought my 15 Duramax ccsb for 51k out the door in Feb of 2015 it was 63k sticker....it was a bit high at the time, but when I see a similarly equipped truck today is close to 80k sticker.....yes, it's glutinous or as some might say, capitalism/ supply/ demand. Definitely not inflation at work. No way can I grabbed a LTZ today in the 50k range...it will correct.
I agree 100%. I personally don't need a brand new vehicle . If I had the money for a diesel or gas hd truck I'd go between 2005 to 2010 if I could swing it. 50,000 f150's I mean really . Not knocking Ford btw they're all doing it now.
Nothing but FACTS! idk care how they are optioned out and how great they try and make them out to be...
Yeah they are a lot of money but if you count in inflation even my 2001 F150 sticker prices was just under 32k new and adjusted for inflation its 48k in 2019 money. Considering all the technology and advances it's really not that bad, it's the cost of living and wages that have not kept up with cost of things.
I'm not sure what you base your statement on. What do you think they should cost and why?
Depending upon the wind - that can really kill mileage. My F350 with a camper averages 12.3 with no wind. On a windy day the mileage can go as low as 9.5 MPG. You need to re-run the test on a day with no wind if you can do that.
It was windy for the Chevy too!
I just can’t get over how damn ugly those chevys are. Goodness!!
It’s great that we have these truck wars as it helps the consumer. I do have to agree that Chevys are butt ass ugly.
Also thought that but now that I’ve seen in it person really changed my opinion
J S lot better looking in person in my opinion
Right! It looks like they just threw their hands in the air and gave up on coming up with a better design.
Saw one in person, it didn’t too bad.
The GMC still looks miles better.
48 gallon tank! I I can hear my bank account screaming now 😅
Sure it's a large tank but it uses the same amount of fuel if not less than a tundra which has a 26 gallon tank. Less stops needed to fill up.
Micheal Dingle agreed.👍
Micheal Dingle id still hate to be looking at the screen at the pump when I’m filling up from 1/4 tank lol
Gives you allot more range when you need it. My 2014 Sierra 1500 has only 26 gal and I wish it had 30 or more. I've taken it to places in Northern Canada with long distances between fuel stops. Which makes me wonder. How big was the fuel tank on the Chevy they tested? All that extra fuel weight might account for the difference in fuel economy.
@@loganholmberg2295 Agreed. I love the 36 gal tank on my F-150.
Considering it's a brick. 15 mpg ain't bad. The chev has a better drag coefficient. I think it'll even out on the ike, when aero is not a factor. 🤙🏻
But whats it real world power and MPG numbers once the limp mode comes on due to whatever $1000+ emissions component of the week going out, since that's pretty much how every diesel I have seen built in the last nearing 10 years actually spends most of it life opperatiing running as?
OH, wait! It's not a diesel so it doesn't have that problem! :D
I just can't believe GM made their truck look like a catfish.
lol
The mustang looks more like a catfish lol
That good sir..... Is spot on.. lol. And I have a chevy..
Good video, interesting results. Both ford and Chevy will still be my favorite 2 truck brands
Chevy is my favorite trucks
Chevy and ford are the best.
Lil Johnny2.0 agreed
My father has a 2014 Ford F150. It averages 13mpg. Without a load.
(Edit) His truck is lifted slightly and has 35×12R18 tires.
He needs to keep his foot off the gas mine gets 16 -22mpg
That's odd. What octane fuel is he using and does he haul stuff in the back or pull a trailer? Driving short distance lowers mpg's as well like in my '13 F150 with a 5.0L. I drive a 2 mile round trip 5 day's a week and 20 mile round trip on Sunday. My mileage is 7.2 mpg.
RIP off the stock exhaust and put in a K&N air filter plus air up your tires to almost max psi that helps immensely
something isnt right with that truck then my average between highway and city is about 17-18mpg
And that's half the reason why I wanna upgrade to an 18+, the fuel economy
Since it’s mostly a freeway loop, the weight had less to do with economy than the winds and temps. The comparison to the GM at this point is purely anecdotal. Need same trailer and load with same atmospherics to get a reasonable comparison.
GMs get better real world gas mileage.
Billie Buckamer based on what evidence?
@@billiebuckamer8189 I agree but its god awful ugly.
My 99 f250 gets 9mpg. ( lifted 33s) empty. I could care less its a great truck. A good engine will only cost you fuel thats it
Robb M the video
You can't compare tests from different times of year. You need to take into account winter fuel and summer fuel blends. Also air temperature will affect fuel milage. To compare they need to be tested at the same time under the same conditions with the same fuel.
Agreed. A truer test would have been them running side by side at the same time, pulling the same weight(GCVW), and then compare. Considering both test runs of the F250 were into the wind accounts for something as well as the winter blend fuel.
@@acdii um they drove a loop so one way was into the wind and the other would be with the wind at your back. so it all cancels its out.
@@wiks101 Did they have the same with the other truck? If not, then not a true comparison. Besides, a head wind can really affect MPG more than a tail wind, so it wont really cancel it out unless the tail wind is at least 10 MPH more.
@@acdii What a geographical and physics oddity--Into the wind down AND back, in a down and back comparison!
@@T51B1 Where did you read they had a head wind both ways? Did they really?
If the 7.3 coupled up with a 4.30 rear end is any thing like my 6.2 gas it will do great.
I just bought a '19 F350 with the 6.2 and 4.30s, so far I love it the only complaint is the god awful mileage. Coming from a 2005 Cummins towing on the highway leaves something to be desired but anything under 50/55 I think the 6.2 is as good if not better than the 6 speed common rail.
Yeah it took me some time gettin use to a gas motor but I’ve had mine for 5 years now and it’s been the best vehicle I’ve ever owned. It’s got 149000 miles on it and I pull constantly. I’m off road a lot with me job to. I’ve put on 1 front axle , battery. And brakes. Other than that change the oil ($26) and that’s it.
The 4.30 would help.
Yeah man. I like the 4.30
@@TheMCD1989 That's where the 10 speed might come in.
CHEVY WINS AGAIN....nothing beats a LS motor. I get the same mileage with a 6.0 w a 4.10.
MK I have 6.0 with 3.73 and it gets about the same pulling but empty 14 mpg it has 197,000 miles on the engine
I used to have a 2000 chevy 2500 4x4 6.0 4l80 it got 12mpg on the freeway
I love Ford but their engines are over complicated and break down more easily. Chevy is smart, small block pushrod v8’s will never die as long as they keep it simple.
4.10 gearing sucks though
The 6.6l l8t they tested here was actually not a LS engine. They are a fifth generation sbc like the 6.2l, but are stroked to 6.6l. So they are in the new "LT" engine family.
I have watched many videos with truck comparisons. There are the Ford Guys, Dodge guys, and the Chevy men! When trucks come off of the showroom floors, stuff works. After 100,000 miles, let me see which trucks are still performing at a satisfactory level. New trucks have wat to many bells and whistle gadgets and that leads to more failures. I live in a harsh winter climate 5 months out of the year in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Mechanical door steps, multi use tailgates, auto tailgates, low profile wheels, fancy chrome trim, and lady features! All that stuff fails at -10 and in deep snow with a 100 Libs of ice stuck to the truck. Ford has tons of great tech! Dodge plenty of power with a Yugo transmission! And the Chevy with a check engine light. I got 240,000 on my 02 Chevy Avalanche and it lasted 17 years before I sold it. I bought a 14 Chevy WT 1500 with 100,000 and it works great. Not a lot of bells and whistles, but practical. I just want a rust proof truck, which the manufacturers can make but they won’t.
Once again GM proves to have the best gas V8. The rest of the truck is still up for debate. I must say ford did good for port injection.
Chevy makes a great truck.....this year's front end and mirrors just look like hot garbage.
I’ll hand it to GM they know how to make a solid gas v8 they’ve been doing it since the small block Chevy days
I have a 2500 Chevy heavy duty. Mirrors are awesome for visibility around them. The chrome front looks much better. Absolutely love my truck
I loved the longevity of my old 6.0 gas in the 2500HD I had but the 6.2 gas in my current F-250 pulls much stronger. I wished GM wouldn't have waited so long to upgrade the 6.0
Arnold D The 6.0 were junk motors. I’ve known people who have blown em up before the 150k mark.
Glad u guys went with basically a work truck trim f-250 gas it’s something most hard working people could afford rather than a platinum good job
Air temperature also makes quite a bit of difference in MPG comparisons. I used to have a Ford extended E-350 with a V-10. In cold weather (20 degrees F) it'd get about 13 MPG with about 3500# of cargo. In 70 degree weather, it'd be up to 16 MPG. If your comparing MPG you have to keep the conditions the same as possible. Also the MPG with a gas engine may be lower, but cost of maintenance and intital cost compared to a diesel is also lower. I've got a diesel that I pull my 5th wheel camper with and I love it, but I don't think you ever get you money back. Thank you for all of your great tests.
If you did that’s amazing. Those numbers sound quite a bit over shot though. Are you sure you did the math right?
The V-10s were said to be around 10mpg empty and drop when hauling weren’t they?
My 7.3 wouldn’t get 15 mpg if you dropped it out of an airplane.
Running around out in the pasture driving to town averages about 9 to 10 miles a gallon
Drove it the other day on the open road with the cruise set at 68 miles an hour averaged about 13.1 with a 355.
Still a heck of a lot better than my old 454. Technology has come along ways.
It shows that V8's are the same as they were 50 (or more) years ago, unloaded 15 mpg. Nothing new under the sun. :)
bill stewart and that will be $53,000 thanks here are the keys
Bill you gotta remember that these engines have almost twice the output and the trucks weigh 30 percent more than the old ones. I understand what you are getting at though.
@@jakecreech1659 ya bill
Except new trucks have twice the power output, way more towing capacity, quicker acceleration better everything and probably better fuel economy
The new trucks are also at the mercy of the EPA. They’d use half the fuel otherwise.
If I was actually towing weight like that I wouldn't even bother with a 3.55 gear for the 7.3 engine
I'd go stright for the 430. Gasser l love deep gears
The 3.55 is only rated to tow 12k I think. The 4.30 can do 15k.
The 10 speed makes up for it, it has a really low first gear.
@@serfnuts If it was only rated to tow 12k, why did TFL just tow 14.5k?
What happened to the 3.73 ?
Omg my dad used to work for Cimarron Trailers in Chickasha, Oklahoma!!!
My 1990 f250 4x4 with the 460 gets 13.2 mpg driving at 60 mph.
It has 165,483 miles on the original engine.
You must have the E4OD and 3.73 gears. I had a similar F-250 (regular cab long box, nothing huge) with the 460, C6, and 4.10s and it had a hard time getting double-digit MPGs. I think the best I ever did was around 12 but that's no Overdrive and big gears in the rear end. It would pull anything you wanted it to but sucked gas down. The 460 would do 300k+ miles no trouble, I know plenty of people who used to use them pulling race cars and campers cross-country.
@@406Steven it does have the E4OD with 4.10's and stock size tires/wheels.
In town it 10mpg.
7.3 "Godzilla"
....meanwhile.....
2001 GM 8.1 Vortec glares over the top of it's morning paper, sipping coffee quietly.
The GM 8.1 never sipped coffee. It guzzled oil.
@@4-LOW lol, that's true. I had a '02 crew cab that would casually sip about a quart every 1-2k miles.
OFFRD I’ve got a ‘01 2500hd with the 8.1 and it doesn’t really go through oil real fast but I do get about 8mpg empty 😂😂. But that’s life, I didn’t buy the big block for mpg lol
8.1 with 100 less HP. then the 7.3.
benjaminwayneb built in the early 2000’s there bud. So what it has 100hp less, makes more torque and I can guarantee it’s a hell of a lot more reliable than this not really that impressive 7.3 gas.
So imagine gm adding a 10 speed to their new gasser. Might be better than 16 mpg.
I don't think more gears is always a good thing. I recall on another Gauntlet test one of the two trucks tested had more gears and it kept upshifting and taking the engine out of the power zone. Then the engine would begin to strain and the truck would downshift. It cycled like this the whole way up the mountain...very annoying if I recall. That said, the Ford has good torque so it may not be an issue.
Good review. Thanks. Thinking instead of new truck, reinvest in my truck. 96 F. 250 w/460. I can save lil gas and a lot of 💰 when new one is 50K
There is a good video from bad tree productions on one of their trucks. Look it up. They did a Holley sniper throttle body with the factory efi on the 460. Actually worked really well. I think they were around 15/16mpg on it. And a considerable power gain
I had a2500 Ram power wagon and I loved the engine in it, it was a 6.4 gas and it would do anything that I needed it to do. Love love love the power wagon
Not unreasonable figures, they might improve with break-in and summer blend gas
6:24 Semi truck fuel economy
Some of trucks are hitting 10+ loaded now. Crazy. Our v10 school buses get 7.5 even with all the stops go and idle time. And 8.5 with Cummins. Though the diesels are all being phased out. Too slow, slow heat, and way more maintenance cost. Plus the noise/vibration. The gassers are so much nicer to drive.
What I can’t figure out is why they used 85 octane on the Chevy and 87 octane on the ford. Is their bias only against GM. Do both of these trucks on the same day WITH THE SAME FUEL.
Because they tested the Chevy months ago
SMiller5488 what does that have to do with the octane they used
SMiller5488 maybe they used higher octane in the ford this time in hopes it doesn’t break down going up the Ike like the previous model did last year 🤷♂️😂😂
@@tylerp8951 Warm weather fuel vs cold weather fuel. 85 for the Chevy and 87 for the Ford helps even out thier performances.
call it what it is....a clear cut win for chevy. the chevy pulled more weight and got better MPG at the same time. that is huge
It didn't need to deal with the conditions the Ford was in tho.
@@raionshishi8290 right it only had to deal with the extra sports car it was towing.
@@tristanhipps604 Doesn't make a big enough difference compared to conditions, the conditions of the area matters way more then the weight, have you ever been to a drag strip before ? Those that have been like myself can tell you that conditions really do matter, alot more then what the car is hauling. It can have tons of HP but if it can't put it all to the ground or use it efficiently then there is no point.
Now let’s see the ram 6.4 hemi with the 8 speed please!
I just bought a 2019 ram 3500 6.4 hemi standard cab long bed 4x4. 410 rear. Left nj with 900 miles on the truck. Drove to SW Florida towing 7000lbs. Keeping@ 65 mph and tire pressure at 80psi. I got 12.0 mpg. Very impressed the way it towed and how the transmission acted. I'm a Cummings diesel guy and again I was very impressed...
@@sashashpiruk4865 my dad has a 2014 3500 and he says it's the biggest piece of trash, it's been to the dealer multiple times per month and now the dealer doesn't want to work on his truck anymore, he was probably just unlucky with his truck
@@natetoland7537 I'm sorry to hear that sir. I use to be a die hard Ford guy. But since the 6.0 and 6.4 diesel problems I went Cummings and Rams. I've had nothing but good luck with them. I use them for my transport business and snow plowing. I'm not a fan boy. Just have good luck.
Nate Toland Probably got a lemon. Should of used the lemon law to get a new one.
Sasha Shpiruk - Cummins, Cummins. No g in there,,,,, hahaha. I have heard the same good reports about the Ram Diesels in the Ranching industry as well. All the diesel trucks are good with today’s engines, forgetting the past, but the most loyal followers seem to be Ram! Nice to hear from someone who really uses them and not a mall crawler. (Which I have become since retiring, I used all Ford because I’m cheap, but I didn’t have any problems since 2000. One F350 gas in there, it was a giant pig on fuel.) I have owned well over 100 trucks in my life but I’m done with first hand knowledge of work trucks as of last year. Maybe I will see more of your comments!!
Stay safe out there, Eh.
"we had some wind" wind makes a huge difference.
Towing less weight and with a 10 speed trans, this truck should have blown the Chevy away. Kinda disappointing.
@Bo Brother yeah, i tow a large enclosed trailer regularly. and even with the same truck/trailer combo we never get the same gas mileage. it will always vary with the wind; even cross-winds have a huge effect. something else we have learned is that similar size trucks with comparable power will get vary similar mileage when towing, it's not even noticeable if it has a 6spd, 8spd, or 10spd, although more gears will improve acceleration when loaded heavy.
I've never been a Ford guy, but you really can't go wrong with either of these brands. Chevy and Ford definitely make each other better.
Looking forward to the ike gauntlet!
Glad to see you are finally able to do mileage for the 7.3. Not real bad mileage for that big monster of an engine. Thanks for sharing Andre and Kent enjoyed the review.
So your comparing a test where you wore a t-shirt to one that you have snow on the ground. 👌👌👌 because cold weather doesn't affect mpg at all. Mpg in winter is 12-22% difference. Get the chev back out and try again. Air density change etc. Cant compare yet.
I hate when they test during the winter. I know they really do t have a choice but cold weather really affects mpg.
Cold weather also produces more power.
@@UvidCo less energy efficient in winter. Only electric makes more power and not electric cars either thanks to our battery tech. Does make more power, just takes more fuel.
The Ford is pulling less weight so I don't see much of a difference.
Shouldn’t the wind somewhat cancel out? They would have had a tailwind if they had a headwind in the opposite direction
lol it's not they're in the jet stream! Wind conditions can change quickly and dramatically. Besides, I doubt they were going in a straight line the whole time.
Exactly; They are Ford fanboys so they had to say oh its the wind, The Chevy towed more and got better mileage.
ChicagoSox give your head a shake! I could run that Chevy on 3 different runs on different days of the week and I bet I would get different MPG results each time. Same for the Ford, that’s what happens when you have real world testing. And I hate to tell ya, but that Ford when properly equipped can tow and hall more than that Chevy.
Matt S the Ford can definitely tow, but after watching these videos for a few years they always say the result is the result due to real world testing. This is the first time I’ve seen them make an excuse for the Ford
Dylan Thompson that is true
So much for the 10 speed giving it an edge... Also caught that they said the truck floated from 7 th gear to overdrive and back a lot. Maybe that's why GM kept the old 6 speed. These trucks were built for reliability first after all. I'm sure they are all making less power than they could too for reliability purposes.
Agreed. The gm trucks have always been about the total package. They have always been competitive despite not having the highest numbers.
Lol GM and reliability?
I factor in the differential gear. That Chevy test was a 3.73 rear end. This Ford is running on winter gas with probably the heater running and on 3.55 gearing which is crazy for pulling this much weight.
@@Welcometofacsistube
The only two trucks that had reliability problems on the Ike gauntlet were Ford's.
@@Welcometofacsistube um GM 6.0 liter? that thing built like a tank. My uncle had a work truck with it and it had 350k miles on it and still was going strong.
Idk why people seem to think 15mpg isnt a great number for a big block 3/4 pick up. That's freaking good!!!! My half ton with a 5.0 small block only gets about 10mpg. 12 if theres no headwind. Like what do yall expect it to get? 23mpg? 30mpg?
I get 13mpg in my '11 f250 2wd w/ 6.2 gasser ... I'd call 15mpg a decent improvement.
My 01 Chevy 1500hd gets 11.5 mpg every fill up for over two years now. I think that’s excellent the 7.3 did 15 mpg unloaded. That’s an extra 150 miles out of a tank which will add up quick. These trucks are tremendously out of my price range as I’m not going to spend 60 grand cash on a truck that I’ll destroy in less then three years. The 2010 Nissan frontier looks like my best option as I can get a 6 speed manual and they don’t have many issues. I’m glad I’m matured at 26 and moving past the diesel life. A lot of unnecessary expenses for no reason with diesels plus you can’t even register them once you make them reliable.
Would be nice to see them tow the same weight at a more fuel efficient speed. I usually tow around 60 mph with my f350 dually 6.0.
I think that's one of the biggest problems in their test, they do it at speed. Most people pulling that heavy of a load in a gas (hell even in a diesel) would be 60-65mph for safety and control of the load. Also the Chevy was done in summer and lite winds, the poor Ford got winter fuel (packed with additives and maxed on Ethanol) and high winds. I can tell you all about how high winds effects MPG, I live on the South Texas Coast. We see 20mph + winds very regularly, my 2010 Tundra unloaded driving into that high wind will make 8-9mpg @60mph and 5-6mpg @75mph. But if we get a very calm day of wind, I get 20.8mpg @60mph and 16-17mpg @75mph. Best I have very got was 24.276mpg @60mph with at least a 25mph wind at my back on a trip up to San Antonio. My combined over the 2 years I've had the truck is 13.295mpg, that's about a 35% highway and 65% city driving. Right now on winter blend I'm pulling 10.8-11.9mpg in the city around here, in summer months I get 12.7-14mpg in the city (summer fuel here has almost no ethanol at all, too hot for it to stay in the tanks). So fuel is a big play just as wind is.
survivalguy, my 6.0 powerstroke brother!! Yeah, towing my 5,500 lb camper, I run 65 MPH max. I own an 04 F250 6.0. I don't see how these people run 75-80 MPH safely!
55 60 makes more sense than 70 for sure . The roads by my are so curvy you cant tow above 50
60 MPH in the Ford is WOT LOL
@@TheVenom8343 to answer your question ive been wrencing on a fleet of over 800 super duties in the harshest environment known to man ( the oilsands in northern canada ) since 2002 and can say they have gotten WAY more capable over the years , multiple brake upgrades, fully boxed frames, and way more tech as far as electronics (trailer anti sway , advancetrac etc..) the 2020's ride is far more capable then the 2002's (but i still like the simplicity of my 2009 v-10 ... )
Just to put things in perspective, my 454 BBC with an NP 4500 gets 8.2 MPG on the open road, and 7.9 in town.
So, your 15 and 16 MPG sound pretty good to me. --- Thanks for the great upload. ---
So you’re gonna be stopping for gas about every 250 miles. “I needed to stretch my legs anyway.”
I stop for gas about every 250 miles or so in my F-250, and 250-300 miles in my Impreza. Unless the Mrs is coming along, then we're stopping every 1-1.5 hours for a pee break and might as well top off the tank while we're stopped.
Since you also needed to run mid grade in the Ford that made a fill up even more expensive.
All those gears you would expect 18+ with it empty haha
It does weigh what, 7,500#?
Around 6,800 for crew cab 4x4, I believe.
A 10 speed transmission just weighs a truck down if anything. Getting rid a of a 4 speed automatic was the worst the they could do.
@@waterloo123100 idk I like my 6spd on my 2019 I wouldn't want any more than 6 gears on a heavy duty truck. My 06 duramax I believe had 4 and it was a tank
Cowboy Texas Is your truck a Ford or a Gm? We actually like the Ford 6 speed autos at my transmission shop. They have a lot less problems then the Gm version. But we prefer the 4 speed because of the simplicity and how light they are. Their truly the best if you plan on working them hard.
this is the most important youtube channel for truck buyers
Finally! We have results! Nice vid guys.
Imo, the ford could do better, a couple examples on youtube were achieving much better gas mileage but, the real world varies based on altitude, temperature, how flat the road is, etc
Depending on where people live, their numbers can be better or they can be worse, im rootin tootin for the the big block Ferd!
Except wouldn’t you assume the same for the competition as well then?
Altitude mostly in this case. I took my V8 F-150 from Florida to ~6,300' elevation and lost about 2mpg hwy.
This is pretty simple here folks GMC 6.2 l is a 377 cubic inch and Ford 7.3 445 cubic inch you can't compare the gas mileage of a 377 to a 445 just like back in the day trying to compare a 454 Big block to a 350 Chevy gas mileage bigger cubic inch motors of course. Worse gas mileage on this test the Ford for having a much bigger cubic inch motor did not get a dramatically worse MPG rating so I would definitely stick with a Ford.
Your results are pretty much exactly what I expected; comparable but with the 6.6L doing a bit better. Direct injection is simply better from a pure power and efficiency standpoint.
Those trucks get same mpg than my 2012 tuned dmax . Thats impressive.
@TFL why was 87 octane (without ethanol ) used for the ford but 85 octane (with 10% ethanol) was used for the Chevrolet?
The different fuel grades do literally nothing for power, the higher octane just makes it less likely to detonate.
@@A_Man_Of_Culture_ The Ethanol even though its only 10% does effect economy. It won't effect it much but there is still an effect i got an 07 truck that is flex fuel, its reg gas vs e85 numbers are difference of i think was 20% loss using e85. Its only 10% in this case but still gonna hurt a small bit in fords favor.
I caught that also i thought it was just me. They did use 85 .When they did that I was said ewww no. So the chevy gets better mpg on cheaper gas go figure .Way to go Chevy !
A Man of Culture so you obviously know nothing about engine detonation management. 🙄
@@paul.s9677 The Chevy was tested with warm weather fuel vs cold weather fuel for the Ford. 87 octane helps compensate for worse quality fuel and make the test more equal.
Well I just ordered a 2020 f350 with the 7.3 and I can't wait. I don't get trucks for gas mileage but I'll take 15mpg.
Seems like they were making a lot of excuses for that F-250. 🤣
You had Winter blend fuel in the 7.3 which gives worse MPG. When you tested the Chevy I think you were still in the Summer blend. Big difference in MPG with the two blends.
xelvic congrats welcome to real world testing. You get whatever gas they put in the pumps when you drive. They don’t have control over when they receive the trucks either
It's all physics when it comes to towing . Every truck is going to get similar mpg. What's more important in my opinion is brake distances, merge lane acceleration and overall handling.
is that why trucks twenty years ago got half the gas mileage? im going to send you a brain in the mail...you can stick it in your ear
I wasn't really referring to 20 year old trucks. Even so whatever truck your using to tow 14K pounds with, it just takes that much gas (energy to move it). Yes technology has changed and i'm not arguing that. If you took a 20 year old truck and strapped 14K trailer to it, I'd bet it would still get similar mileage towing as the new ones,.. single digit mpg. Technology or not it just takes fuel, the new ones of course do tow better. So yes a 20 year old truck would not get anywhere near the same mileage empty if that is your point, however I said when towing, not overall mpg.
My 2002 F250 with the 5.4 gasser can get 16+ mpg in the summer, and handle a 12,000 lb GVWR with plow and sander in the winter.
It’s time to upgrade, but $53k is a tough pill to swallow.
@@philtripe and the funniest comment of 2020 goes to...... 2big 2fail
Not true. Different fuel systems and ignition systems can improve the energy lost by the fuel consumption of the engine. The modern engine is still only about 30% efficient. The rest of the gasoline is lost in the form of heat. Being able to capture more energy and use the gasoline more efficiently is constantly improving.
Not a fair comparison, summers are warmer, have calmer winds, and have less ethanol added, which increase fuel efficiency. Winter cold forces the engine to work harder to stay warm, plus higher ethanol is added in addition to other additives to "improve" fuel economy (doesn't really), and wind factors also puts more resistance against the vehicle. The fact that the Ford only got 1.3mpg less then the Chevy while under more extreme conditions says the Ford is actually better. And if my truck's performance record is anything to go off of (18 summer highway, 15 winter highway), the Ford's summer performance would be around 7-9mpg if under the same conditions as the Chevy was.
Great comparison and you're the only one doing doing towing tests.
Like to see you add coolant temp and EGT to your tests. EGT is usually a diesel thing but towing it would be interesting to see how gas exgdust temps under load.
EGT matters on turbocharged engines because of the boost. EGT is not an issue on naturally aspirated engines, even when towing heavy uphill. Engine oil & trans. oil temps are.
Here’s my 1.5 yr. ownership experience with the 2020 Chevy 2500 experience below. Thanks guys for your test reviews of this and the Chevy. And for your honest reactions that I noticed Andre seemed to hope the Ford Godzilla would do better than the Chevy especially since the Chevy pulled a heavier trailer. I’ve sensed from other videos how Andre likes the “Godzilla” name and all. To keep this peaceful, both essentially get within 1 mpg of each other, how’s that? PS, I own my 2020 Chevy 6.6L gasser and … love it thus far. I get 17-18 mpg US on Hwy and 14-15 city and worse for both in winter. I Love the 82” long standard bed, the front & rear side steps (plus the optional side mounted Bed Storage Boxes leaving 4 ft. Width in my box yet lots of storage = Awesome!!!) direct fuel injection engine with the JD Power proven reliability and beefed up 6L90 transmission for this new 6.6L. Because I live in an area that has +6 months of real winter, I appreciate the AutoTrac transfer case for more secure winter driving.
With port injection and pushrod tech, I bet that engine will last forever. None of the fancy crap to go wrong or gum it up.
Port is usually less reliable than direct. Doesn’t the 6.6 have pushrods as well? I would bet the 6.6 will last longer.
The stance of the F250 looks like it came with the FX Onroad Edition .
Just want to say you guys do an amazing job all the time!
For future comparison videos, would it be possible to film both trucks on the same day with Mr Truck in the other vehicle to eliminate variables like the wind and weather conditions if it could be done logisticly.
My 2017 6.2 with a 6 speed does much better - I will stick with the 6.2. Not much difference in HP and Torque. Unloaded and stock, I get 17 mpg through the mountains of NC.
Ideally, the GM and the Ford could have been tested on the same day (or even at the same time, for the unloaded test!) in order to eliminate weather/wind as a variable, but we (unfortunately) don't live in an ideal world. I admit to being pretty intrigued by the new 7.3L Ford gasser, but it is REALLY difficult to compete with GM on OHV gas V8s... that has been their bread and butter for YEARS, with no forays into OHC architecture, etc... to take engineering dollars away from the OHC V8 program(s).
I don't think it's difficult for Ford to compete with it.. GM is now in 3rd place for truck sales, behind even Ram. Ford is still the only manufacturer that makes their own engine, transmission, and axles. Also the 7.3 torque curve is superior to the 6.6 and has forged internals- forged crankshaft. The Silverado is still using a 6 speed on their gas v8...
Add up the numbers dude. When GMC and Chevy trucks are combined they easily outsell Ford. The 6 so is a proven workhorse. We’ll see how the 10 does
@@CortJohnson please explain the logic in how using two truck brands with double the overhead for manufacturing that barely leads Ford when combined is somehow meaningful... lmfao IDK why some fanboys are so desperate to claim #1 with an obscure and meaningless calculation. GM can't sell 1 pickup line anywhere close to F-series or Ram.
@@sly9263 GM just sold more trucks last month than Ford and Ram. It’s as simple as that.
@@sly9263 sounds like the only fan boy is you,,and ford has never outlived a Chevy truck,,do your research before you embarrass yourself anymore..
GM needs to add the 10 speed to the 6.6L.
The light duty half ton 10 speed auto was a joint venture between Ford and GM
DocTube ..The HD 10 speed in the F250/350 is not the same as the Allison 10 speed in the Silverado 2500/3500 Duramax.
The 1/2 ton trucks do share the GM/Ford joint venture light duty 10 speed transmission but they went in separate directions for the HD's.
rlhmarines True. I know they worked on the 10 speed together for the half ton truck and suv. I assume the HD 10 speed is based on the lighter duty 10 speed but with upgraded components.
Fun fact: GM has built Allison transmissions for years, GM sends the transmission to Allison to have it validated to meet their standards and receive the Allison branding.
www.tfltruck.com/2018/12/2020-chevy-silverado-hd-allison-transmission/
@@doctube2020 Ford's HD 10-speed is externally larger than the F-150 10-speed.
Can we do the Ram 6.4l next??
Great video, but I believe most people that are looking at super duty gas trucks are NOT pulling 14,500 lbs-16,000 lbs. Trailers. Most trailers are in the vicinity of 8,000-10,000 lbs. At the heavies, maybe 12,000. I understand what you guys are trying to prove by testing the towing claims of these manufacturers. But we would love to see some realistic tow trailers. Thank you guys, you guys have some great videos!!!
As others have mentioned, what considerations were made for the winter blend fuel?
Also, can you explain why you used 14,500 (trailer weight) with the Ford but 16,000 with the Chevy?
Probably because the Chevy was rated to tow more with a lower gear ratio, or it was just rated to tow more period regardless of axle ratio
Maybe to stack he deck...they paid for a Ford. Pretty sure the lower octane and Ethanol more than made up for winter blend, and oh....never mind the 10% lighter trailer
@@darrengibson644 they didnt buy that specific truck they have a different 7.3.
These are max tow fuel economy test. Every video tfl does has glaring inconsistency between trucks. But so does everyone driving them too. Think of this as what a truck your thinking of owning does.
Availability and life is not a str8 road w/o detours ? 🤔
I think it’s worth mentioning the 4 door cab weights a lot more then a standard cab, sometimes by as much as 1000 pounds.
Now if the Chevy beats it in a 0 to 60 towing test, that would be hilarious. 😂
The Chevy is a 6.6L and the Ford is a 7.3L your kind of stupid the bigger the displacement the more gas you use I’d argue the ford is doing better than the Chevy considering the ford has 45 more cubic inches
Well, based off of the 7.3 absolutely DEMOLISHING the Chevy up the hill now, I think we're safe on that not happening lol
@@cooper6585
Yep. With the extra power, gears and lower rear gears it looks like a pretty good puller.
Not happening! Lol!
This is awesome battle of the Big Block V8 mate. Ford 7.3L Godzilla V8 vs GM 6.6L Ecotec gas V8.
Thats pretty much the same as the 6.2 with the 6 speed gets
Ya I am really hoping there will be some more numbers to compare to soon. The loaded mileage is actually worse than my 6.2 6 speed...
That 3.55 just arent good for towing ,
Marcus'World it’s coupled to a 10 speed, and first gear is the equivalent of 4.10 gearing with the 6 speed
@@zb6618 you're in first gear for about 2 seconds. More gears doesn't equal more mpg. More gears help when towing up and down grades by being able to keep the engine exactly at it's peak power because the gears are closer together. 3.55 gears are still 3.55 gears at highway speeds
cody roland the 10 speed keeps it at the ideal ratio after first gear, so it pretty much doesn’t matter what the rear gear ratio is because the 10 speed makes it so that it has the same ratio from the engine to the rear end
Does both engines have the fuel management system? Say if the Ford doesn't but the chevy does, that could be the reason 🤔, but in reality 1 mpg isn't much of a difference, especially considering the big 1 liter difference in motors, well technically, .7, but just a thought. Thanks great video as usual 👍🏼
Give me the Chevy any day!
Jesse James you can have it. That thing is fugly.
Nice video guys. One thing I notice when checking gas mileage on my vehicles over the years, is that ambient temperature and wind can make a huge difference. My driving usually takes through Ohio, Kentucky and Tennessee so I often see major temperature swings. As the temp goes down so does my mileage. I would really like to see the F-250 test on a warmer day. Enjoy your videos and commentary.
Who want a transmission that's hunts through 7-10 gears all the time.....
As long as you're not dealing with too many hills, then you won't be worrying about 7-10. My buddy is a mechanic and he's probably 75% reliable which I can say more for some people.
Thats one issue I have with GM truck transmissions. They don’t like to shift and they will sit in a gear and high rev unless you punch the gas.
After having a F-150 with the 10 speed and towing 6200 pounds, and trying to tow that same 6200 pounds with a 6-speed F-150, I will take the 10 speed ALL DAY LONG. Period.
The EPA.
This was good to watch but if you test brands, test on same day with same trailer with identical rear gears. I know a lot of viewers that are saying this same thing. Might be different results
Oscar Mayer they do their best, but get what they get when they can. Gives you an idea though based on the consistent loop. It’s not like you’re going to see a 5-10 mpg variance.
Chevy wins: 16 mpg unloaded. 6.9 mpg pulling the trailer.
Ford: 15.1 mpg unloaded. 5.6 mpg pulling the trailer.
THE FORD HAD A HEAD WIND WHICH MAKES A BIG DIFFERENCE. AND THE FORD ENGINE IS BIGGER AND MORE POWERFUL. 6.2 VS 7.3. DO THE MATH, THE FORD GETS BETTER FUEL ECONOMY PER LITER OF ENGINE SIZE. I DID THE MATH.
@@jamesdenton5422 found the Ford guy...........
@@jamesdenton5422 someone said they put 10% ethanol in the Chevy and regular in the Ford though. If that's true the Chevy did even better.
@@jamesnm21 That person were probably lying or mixed up, it was the Ford who got the ethanol mix and additives and was driving in cold winter with high wind. The Chevy was in summer with little wind.
They ran 85 octane in the Chevy and pulled 16000 vs 14500.F the wind
Not tested under the SAME conditions.
How much did the Ford squat with the load? Looks like a fair amount.
Ford suspension is shit. My F-350 squats terribly. Rides very smooth without a load but once a load is on it rides like crap! Best heavy duty truck I road in with a load is the RAM
@RJ AB typical fanboy reaction
@@dylanmorvant1041 Rides well but squats terribly? Sounds like the opposite of my F-250, which has lighter springs.
To fill that truck here it cost me $254 buck Canadian that's a lot of money for one tank of gas.
Very similar mpg's to what i seen in my old 2500 6.0 Silverado with 4.10s when it was stock.
This test wasn't fair and the Chevy still won, the new GODZILLA f250 towed less weight, had more fuel efficient gearing and they gave the f250 87 while the Chevy got 85 octane and the Chevy still did better AND the Chevy is $5k cheaper.
That new 6.6 looks pretty impressive