Shroud on Why 1440p is Better than 1080p in Valorant and Csgo
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 авг 2024
- Shroud on Why 1440p is Better than 1080p in Valorant and Csgo
Mu-oah Mu-oah kiess
Thanks for watching
If you want to take down a video email me (please don't copystrike): jettmainiskawaii@gmail.com
These are Valorant Clips Highlights From Your Favorite Streamers Content Creators 2022
Tenz, NRG Aceu, hazed, ANDROID, Ethan, tex, Heretics lowel, keloqz, Tarik, TSM Subroza, Seven, gMd, Corey, Rossy, Version 1 Zander, effys, zellsis, wippie, penny, iiTzTimmy, Shroud, SEN Sick, Kanpeki, Sinatraa, ShaZaM, Sentinels dapr, Zombs, Grimm, C9 Xeppa, Cloud9 Autumn, mitch, vanity, leaf, curry, Flights, 100T Asuna, stellar, Bang, XSET Cryocells, Ayrin, dephh, Zekken, BCJ, BIG AslaN, OPTIC Yay, dashy, s0m, Wardell, Kyedae, QuarterJade, Masayoshi, S1mple, Hiko, Mixwell, Prod, Ploo, Rise Shanks, The Guard Trent, neT, Valyn, JonahP, psalm, sayaplayer, Knights Genghsta, a2guapo, Averagejonas, Disguised Toast, Sykkuno, Valkyrae, Fuslie, Pokimane, Kkatamina, LilyPichu, Michael Reeves, OTV, OflineTV, G2 hoody, Meddo, nukkye, AvovA, crashies, Marved, FNS, Victor, DRX BuZz, Liquid ScreaM, L1NK, soulcas, Nivera, Jamppi, Nadeshot , Gambit Nats, Redgar, Acend cNed, starxo, Zeek, MONSTEERR, Odablock, Faze babybay, POACH, Dicey, T1 steel, thwifo, xeta, sayaplayer, Ethos, Zeta crow, Laz, Dep, TENNN, SugarZ3ro, Paper Rex f0rsakeN, d4v41, Jinggg, Benkai, mindfreak, Fnatic Alfajer, Enzo, Derke, Boaster, Mistic, forZe Coffee, Art1st, Giants russ, Kiles, ShadoW, LG moose, Fitinho, MOUZ RECIDENT, KRYPTIX, memset, Luzuh, al0rante, jett, NIP JhoW, xand, Guild Sayf, koldamenta, Team Secret dispenser, JessieVash, DubsteP, BORKUM, witz, Keyd heat, v1xen, murizzzzz, mwzera, LOUD aspas, Less, pANcada, Saadhak, Sacy, chamber, FURIA qck, nzr, Khalil, mazin, Full Sense Johnolsen, Lammysnax, SuperBuss, Chalalala, PTC, KRÜ Klaus, Mazino, NagZ, delz1k, keznit, GenG rhyme, jcStani, Gen G Shawn, NaturE, FPX ANGE1, Shao, ardiis, Zyppan, Suygetsu, SMB glovee, Brave, Izzy, Akrew ZachaREEE, NYFU vice, ShoT UP, YaBoiDre, One Breath Gaming zeddy, T1 Sunday, ROK3T, Anaks, C9 Moothie, B4 Esports Fuzari, coL C0M, Prodigy JEROME, Sector One iDex, INTERPOL deM0, cry0, Alliance Seider, DarkZero Drone, KOLER, B8 Esports dimasick, BBL AsLanMashado, Turko, pAura, aimdll, VALORANDO rAx, DWG t3xture, exy, Esperanza, ORDER Texta, Disk0, Vitality BONECOLD, DNG Suggest, Pioneers thief, T1 ZerG, REJECT Reita, takej, Zepher, Sharks frz, C9 Poiz, Excel Patitek, chiwawa, On Sla2ers Zunba, TS, k1Ng, GodDead, Bazzi, Peri, Bleed eSports pyth, FAV Gaming Fisker, IGZIST Lakia, TSM Academy Dcop, Stars Horizon DiMAS, OG fxy0, ENTER FORCE 36 iNTRO, 10X, Zero Marksmen Black Bjor, Resonate insky, Unicorns of Love nico, MAD Lions Doma, NaVi 7ssk7, dinkzj, NORTHEPTION Meteor, JoxJo, Maru Gaming Jeong Hi, Kalafar Esports Unity, World Game Star iRdy, HANN, Sylvan, Luke, GODLIKE, Clark, Xerxia sScary, sushiboys, Crws, Surf, foxz, Stewie2k, crazyface, vct eu, vct jp, vct apac, vct emea, tournament, vct na, championship, valorant live, valorant cinematic, valorant montage, valorant gameplay, valorant mobile, daily valorant, valorant champions tour, valorant prod, valorant tips, valorant esp, valorant highlights, valorant clips, optic valorant, valorant funny moments, valorant moments, funny valorant moments, valorant best moments, valorant wtf moments, reacts, reactions
While I'm not a FPS gamer this was one of the first things I noticed going from 1080p to 1440p. Distant objects became crystal clear and of course everything up close is much sharper. It's the perfect resolution for balance of quality and performance without needing a super expensive GPU like a 4090 to drive.
hey can i play games there in 1080p,like will it look good?(cuz i have a 1660 ti and it can run some games at 1440p but not all...so just asking)
Playing on 4k now. Probably a overkill for comp games but amazing for things like Cyberpunk.
@@ImLehwzhow much is the difference between 2k and 4k when looking at distant objects?
@@delveticas idk exactly, but I tested 4k vs 1440p and the difference is super significant. Would recommend. I myself got the M28u
BUT what about the fps in games like Apex on 1440p ? what gpu do I need to get constant 240 fps on 1440p res ? 1440p doesnt eat a lot of your fps compared to 1080p ?
And here is Kenny s playing at 1024x768 all his life.
kenny is playing only csgo :D
@@1337rottec He's streaming Valorant as well
@@1337rottec no he's been playing valorant as well.
Scream 800x600 on csgo
Csgo and vslo use msaa, which acts like render scale in both games
well. if you're coming from playing in 720p. 1080p is a dream.
That i thought when using monitor for gaming after using 720p laptop for a years
Imagine coming from 480p like me
1440p has double the pixels
@@anodyneliniment2326 no way
@@katakouzina 480p 20fps on a notebook i7 and nvidia mx250
I used to play on a 15" 720p TN panel on my 6-year-old laptop (now 8 years old). Upgrading to a laptop that has a 16" 2560x1600 IPS display was the best quality of life improvement I ever made in my life, considering I use my laptop for 8 hours a day, it's just insane.
u must hate urself
@@iB_pOpNI use to play on a 42” 720p tv on war zone 1 on like a 2013 Xbox 1. I now use a 1440p monitor on war zone 2 and I swear I could see better on warzone 1 with the big tv.
You're gonna be surprised when you plug that 1440p laptop in a 1440p 27" screen, trust me. I've been there. I also went from 720p laptop to 1440p laptop (Legion 5 Pro) and bought/plugged it in a 27" 1440p monitor. I am not going back.
Jesus the amount of pixels in 16 inches is crazy.
I had 32' 1080p 60hz tv on my desk it's 10yo so i dont even know what type of panel it is, recently bought 27" 1440p 160hz nano ips. And it's just a new world, everything is so sharp and clean.
True, playing 1280x768 streched (CSGO and CoD MW3) and the benefit besides subjectively less input lag is that the blurry "thing" we are shooting at is bigger and therefore again subjectively easier to hit consistently.
It's only less input lag because it's lighter on the GPU, if you're getting the same fps at 4k vs 768p then there's no difference to your input lag. Frametimes are only determined by your PC and how demanding the graphics settings are
@@mttrashcan-bg1ro even hypothetically, no one's getting the same fps at 4k and 768p lol. But yeah I get you
I play cs on 1800x1440p a friend of me plays on 1920x1440p. Those are the best stretch resolutions imo
Yes, but the things also move faster and You have less FOV, IMO there's more cons than pros
imagine playing on a 2002 res in 2023 lmao
I play a lot of apex at 1080p and if an enemy is far away I just shoot at where I think the pixels are a different color and I somehow hit them
Yeah, Apex @ 1080p/24'' is a guessing game at range LOL
Do yall have bad vision or something? 1080 you can see them.
@@adamo36532 you just dont have enough experience to know what you are talking about
Ye dat true I place my screen few inches away from my face
So relatable but for me not in Apex, its battlefield and CS2, I play on 1440p ultrawide monitor and oh man, things look 10 times much better at far away range plus the immersion you get with those ultrawide aspect ratio is like a cherry on top!
It's not about the resolution but pixel density. That's why 24' 1080p is better than 27' 1080p.
yep
Can 100% agree from experience.. Used to play on my Sceptre 27' curved monitor, then swapped back to my Asus 24' monitor and its a world of a difference. Accuracy, tracking and control just felt much better and faster on the 24' one.
And then there is me on 27inch instead of playing 1440p playing 960p :D
@@konradwysokinski8063 you crazy i play on 1440p on csgo native i cant imagine playing on that
Correct... 1440p on 32" is equally blurry as 1080p on 24".unfortunately gaming community does not even consider ppi a thing
It obviously also depends on the size of a monitor. 32" QHD is same pixel density as 24" HD. It also depends on how far away you sit from a monitor. If you sit really close you might want to get highest pixel density possible. Probably what shroud explains is exactly this: he sits really close and with QHD targets would be more crisp.
Also really depends on game. He probably talks about some pubg or apex. This is not so relevant in cs go. Otherwise in cs go all pros would not play low res.
I have a 24.5 inch 1080p monitor and I'm so done with it I can't fkng see a thing past 10 meters I'm not even joking it looks pretty fkng bad and I'm talking about valorant and cs now btw so it's not true that resolution matters less because while it's not hard to spot the targets themselves in lower res shooting and focusing on targets in lower res is much harder so imma get 1440p.
@@yarincool1237 I think you just have a bad 1080p monitor, but yeah, upgrade!
@@vincere13 Dell s2522hg it's good for the price and it's generally good but the 1080p is just garbage I can't see anything.
32" QHD has the same pixel density as a 24" FHD but the screen is literally bigger with the same pixel density, so you will still see better unless you also get farther away from the 32".
About the csgo pros, playing at lower resolutions has its advantages but imo they mostly play low res because they're used to it, they will just use what they've been using their whole life since 1.6, and the fact that everyone keeps playing low res kinda influences that trend even more, like "everyone is still playing low res, I shouldn't change anything".
Personally even in valorant and cs I struggle very hard to see people and track them sometimes I legit just lose sight of them cuz the image is so blurry for me, I'm with glasses btw and with the glasses which Im with all the time so all I said above is with glasses.
He'll flip out when he hears about 4k monitors
4k is a little harder to get that high of refresh rate
@@ironrazor7244 and you cant run 400fps on 4k for sure its just not for competitive gaming
"they probably don´t even know what the f they´re shooting at...... just shooting at things" that got me laughing gotta admit
I switch between 1080p and 1440p monitors regularly, both set at 165hz, and i can say that 1440p always delivers a much better gaming experience!
ah yes the more the better.
then why are u switching???? 1440p usually is 27 inch which is TOOO BIG for csgo or valorant!!! u have to move your head to see the mini map etc
@@user-de9dg9rg9m and cant you just see the monitor at better distance?
lol
@@user-de9dg9rg9m Are you sitting with your nose touching the monitor?? If you try to save your eyes at all, and sit at an arms length, 27" is great IMO - so long as you're at 1440p. 24" was preferrable on 1080p just because of the PPI
Should I buy a 165hz 2k monitor or a 1080p 240hz monitor im confused
I saw an update where he went back to his old 1080 though...
Oh shit Thanks for the update man. But the argument still stands tho.
Low res gaming Sucks ass
@@kurokai365 yeah I agree. I used your vid in an argument in a forum. Oh and here is the vid where he switched back. They say he was nerfing himself?
ruclips.net/video/r5jjOHqPkQM/видео.html
I think he switches to 1080 because if they play at the event monitors there will be 1080 thought so he need to get use to it
Pretty sure he switch to 1080 because that's what res monitors they were using in the tourny. He is back to 1440 now.
@matejswipe 1080p is low res if uve played 1440p
like going from 144 to 60
Tbh we're definitely in the age where 1440p competitive monitors are more than good enough and modern PCs can run comp games at framerates that work just fine on that resolution. I'd recommend upgrading as well. Been using a 1440p 240hz for a year or two now and it's awesome.
after using 1440p for a while, 1080p genuinely feels a little blurry for me. Like I can see and count the indiviudal pixels on my screen, 1440p the pixels are far less noticable.
The time when 1080p is low res.
It actually is I have a 2k 144hz monitor that only cost me 189 euros or 199 US dollars soo yeah right now hight resolition with good hz is not that expensive to get unless you go for crazy 4k or 240 hz what Is overkill in my opinion but a modest 2k 144hz is quite cheap to get and compared to that 1080p or lower is quite garbage to look at
@Matej Swipe Tn panel is so shit man, only ips panel or more expensive oled
@Matej Swipe VA
1080p has been low rez since 2018
@@Tofuey 1080p is not low res lol, it's still one of the most commonly used resolutions in gaming. You people are out of touch with reality
It's kinda obvious I mean try playing 800 x 600 and it's all blurry especially in the distance. When you increase resolution it's for sure the other way around. It's just more crisp image nothing strange about it.
also on a 27 inch 1080p has to start stretching the pixels making it less clear, 24 inch is best for 1080p and 27 inch up is good for 1440p and 4k
i play csgo 800x600 1900 hour xd
Tried 1440p in csgo and never went back. It really is just that much more clear.
Mee too
@@sprsonic6286 there’s dozens of us!
Do u guys stay at native 1440p or have u tried to scale down the resolution or use black bars because 1440p is alot of screen space u often cant evemmn look at the peripherals when focusing on your reticle
@@xXxC0nSUm3rXxX1337 This is completely dependent on the size of the monitor and has nothing to do with resolution.
Sure, 1440p 27in will look better than 1080p 27in because there's more pixels per inch, but everything will be the same distance on screen.
I just switched from 1080p to 1440p on a OLED monitor and omg I will never go back to 1080p!! The OLED also makes them colours pop so nicely
Is it really that much better? I had a 360hz 1080p pannel and never had issues with visibility far away honestly
As someone playing on a laptop, no, I don't know what I'm shooting at xD gonna upgrade to 1440p 144hz soon, hyped af already
I was playing csgo since 2014 and other fps's back then. Hopped from 22" to 24" in like 2015 I think? Then to 27" in 2019 or 2020, and now playing 32" samsung monitor since 2 months. I had to switch from 1080p to 2K on this last 32" monitor because as Mike said, it's blurry af.
rank? still gold nova XDDDDDD
@@Luka99 ?
I got tired of switching my resolution every time I'm playing CS , I ended up forced to adapt with native resolution
It's confirm ! Sentinels will be playing on 1440p from now on 😆
24/25 inch 1080p is all u need to competitive, Hz > res all day, all rest is a marketing BS told by people on payroll
true
cope
1440p does look better in other games and on desktop but ye if you only want to compete youll play 720p 4:3 stretched on either of those anyway so..
I am having trouble in seeing people in CSGO/valorant 1080p 25 inch so personally the argument that 1080p is enough for competitive ain't true for me at least.
@@yarincool1237 if you having trouble in seeing ppl in csg/ valo 1080p 25 inch you you definitely don't have a predisposition for comp gaming, coz u simply blind :)
I been trired 4K and 2K also 1080P with all settings low for Apex, despite the frame rate I got is lower when the resolution is higher, Shroud is right about the crystal clear visual. For my own opinion, get a 2k but not with crazy big screen (4k can too if your pc is monster tier can hold up at least 144fps above with almost all the time when you are playing) you will see how clear you can saw your enemy. I'm using 1080p 24inch IPS, if I got a pc that can help me maintain 144hz above with 4K, I will definitely go for 4K lolz. Tried 4k 120hz before on Apex, I really like what I'm seeing but unfortunately the input lag is too obvious for playing and my pc fans howling like crazy and it's really annoying so I back to 1080P.
Are 32 inches the right choice for a 1440p 144hz monitor? Ive been using a 27inch 1080p 60hz monitor since 2017. Should I get a 32inch 1440p 144hz or a 4k 32inch 144hz? I bought the RTX 4080.
@@deimosok2003 No, for 1440p you should stick to 27" and for 4K you can do both 27" and 32", the 27" obviously has an insane amount of PPI so it's good for desktop / reading but even in games as well.
I will forever play 1080p 360Hz+ for FPS games but since I have a 4090 I also went for a Samsung G8 32" for singleplayer games. If shooters are your main thing, get yourself a 1440p 27" 144/240Hz monitor. If you aren't too serious about ranked / comp FPS games and enjoy SP games, you can go for 4K but don't expect insane performance without DLSS and a 4090. I would go 1440p with the 4080.
@@mcgmgc Thanks a lot brother you are really really helping my current situation! 💪
@@deimosok2003with a 4080 you can definitely play games at 4k. Just dont expect to play 4k at max settings at 144hz. No graphics card on the market can play 4K 144HZ on demanding AAA titles.
@@mcgmgc hi, what about rx6900xt. do you recommend playing on 2k 27 or 1080p. i spend lot of time on valorant and movies ..
going from 1080 to 1440 32inch monitor was crazy, then i switched to 4k and saw almost no difference, so high refreshrate 1440p is perfect
So I guess it cuts down to: don't be poor. Be rich and buy the best monitor you can get. There is always something better. In 5 years people are going to say how 1440p is "unplayable" and you have to use 4k. It never ends. People love to shit on their previous stuff once they get something better.
As someone who play's on a 720p display with an RTX 3070 I can agree and will change to a 1440p 60HZ or 144HZ monitor next year as this year I blew my budget on the RTX 3070.
dont buy 60hz you'll regret it, save money for atleast 144hz
hope you bought a 244hz monitor for competitve gaming like valorant but if you just play single player games then buy 144hz never buy the 60hz trust me
man playing quake at 320x240, and 640x480, then finally 800x600, and 1024x768 growing up. 1080p is still pretty damn clear.
"can't see anything on lower resolution"? the fact that you were a pro cs player is mind boggling.
After switchin to a 1440p monitor some years ago.. bruh i cant go back, 1080p is horrendous
Yep
agreed 1440p is beautiful
Correct me if I'm wrong that shroud isn't really in the competitive scene now like he was pro some time ago but now he doesn't play as a professional player right? He still is fucking amazing at video games...
In this video he talks about how 1440p is much more clearer than 1080p.
Then there's people in the comment section saying how playing at 1080p is "garbage" or whatever and that 1440p is "superior", yes 1440p is superior visually but for the people who are going to be competitive, they mostly seek visual simplicity and more fps or Hz.
Then there's cheap gamers who are just getting into like actually having a gaming PC and game on it with good performance so guess what they're gonna get (most likely) a 1080p monitor because it gives a better experience overall cause it's a good starting point for them.
Anyway I still don't know why some people are talking about pro players and competitively playing video games in the comment section even though the whole clip and point of the video is not that.
1440p actually gives your more frames in a lot of games now. Current GPUs are being bottlenecked by cpus pretty heavily especially at 1080p. And in most cases the frame times are very close between them. The benefit of 1080p is not what it used to be, and 1440p higher res imo has more advantage than slightly better frame rates for competitive.
@@DJHarmonics You are definetly not wrong, but because of the pandemic there is a lot of people that straight up skipped 3000/6000 amd series, and for these people that have a 2080 for example, 1080p is still considerably more worth it for high framerate gameplay. I for example have a 2060 super, and at 1440p it gets demolished, if I had a 3080 or 3070ti I might argue that 1440p would give me better performance indeed.
@@vincere13 me with 3060ti i have more than 500 ping on 1440, even on like high utility with flashes and smokes.
@@DJHarmonics if your cpu bottlenecked at 200 frames at 1080p then you are as well at 2k upping the resolution wont ever do anything but lower the fps at that point that's what a bottleneck is. that's why CPU testing benchmarks put everything on low settings and resolution to see how much fps the CPU can achieve in that game if you have a beefy enough gpu. with is where the term bottleneck comes from.
@@NoDFX_ That's incorrect. Increasing your resolution can reduce or completely remove a cpu bottleneck. If you have a maximum of 200fps at 1080p and your cpu is the bottleneck, raising your resolution to 1440p will reduce the load on the cpu and allows the gpu to take more of the load therefore reducing the cpu bottleneck. The cpu has the same amount of process load at 1080 as it does at 1440p. You can create a bottleneck to the opposite effect by increasing your render resolution to say 4k which I'm sure you aware of. If you go into a game and try to play at 4k your fps will drop because now you are creating a GPU bottleneck instead of a CPU bottleneck.
The chads on 1024x768 🗿🍷
👇
what’s more important when it comes to play shooter games is the hertz & fps. resolution? not so much. it’s just someone that has already tried higher resolution than 1080p says it sucks, the same goes for who argue between 60hz & 120hz or higher.
(Summary at bottom)
Let me break this down; Refresh-rate (also know as 'Hz') is how many frames per second (FPS) your monitor can display (higher = better). Here are the numbers for the length of milliseconds a frame is displayed for for each refresh-rate:
60Hz -> 16.67ms
144Hz -> 6.94ms
240Hz -> 4.17ms
360Hz -> 2.78ms
144Hz is the 'sweet spot' for most competitive shooters since it's a HUGE improvement over 60hz and will let you react to an enemy faster. Anything over 144Hz is pretty pointless to the average gamer, most people will still be able to feel the difference but unless you are VERY good at the game you play, it's not going to help you that much. Majority of people won't even be able to tell the difference between 240Hz and 360Hz since it's reaching the limit of what the human eye can see so unless you're a full-time gamer (Streamer, RUclipsr, E-Sports, etc.) there's no reason to buy a monitor that can do this.
Next up is resolution.
1080p is 1920x1080 pixels
1440p is 2560x1440 pixels (2.25x as many pixels)
Since 1440p has a lot more pixels than 1080p, your GPU has to work harder to display each frame. This means that if you can get 60 FPS max on 1440p, if you were to switch to a 1080p monitor, you would get 𝘢𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 50% more FPS (being 120 FPS in this case). If you can get 144 FPS or higher on 1440p, then there is NO REASON TO USE 1080p. 1440p will also make the image much clearer which has it's own advantages since you (theoretically) should be able to see enemies easier (1440p also just makes the game look better). If the game you are playing has DLSS or FSR (AI Upscalers) than 1440p is the obvious choice since you can render the game at 1080p, then the AI upscales it to 1440p so you get 1080p FPS on a 1440p display (meaning it takes the same amount of work as rendering a 1080p image but looks better than 1080p but slightly worst than 1440p).
In summary:
If you can get 144 FPS or higher on 1440p resolution, buy a 144Hz, 1440p monitor. If you can't get anywhere near 144 FPS (like 90 FPS or less) on 1440p resolution and you are not willing to upgrade your GPU, or are not planning to upgrade your GPU in 3-5 years, then and only then should you consider getting a 144Hz, 1080p resolution monitor.
ye 1440p is going to become the new norm someday i myself want a 360 hertz 1440p monitor but imma just wait until the prices go down a little besides i don't NEED one i WANT one so my 1080p 75 hertz monitor can do just fine for now
i have 2560x1440p 27 inch but i down scale to 1920 for counter strike^^
My 1440p 165 hz is fine for games like rdr2 or witcher3 etc. Even in DayZ i prefer my 1080p 25inch 390hz
1440p 165hz is fine for any comp game lol faceit lvl 10
240hz 1440p is the best middle ground imo
@@cameronscotty3671do u play stretched or native aspect ratio bro
@@lew_7 stretched 1920x1440 but use to play native
@@cameronscotty3671 same I’ve always played stretched but since getting 2k idk whether to play native or 1920x1440
too bad 1440p 240Hz at 23.8" (basically what is marketed as 24") doesn't exist :(
yeah it's nuts, they just got 27's
And here I am with a 6800xt and 1440p and really thinking about going back to 24 inch 1080p. I feel so sluggish with 27 inch 1440p 😩.
Hey I am going to build my own pc is the 6800xt to much for an 1080p Monitor or should I just buy a 6700 xt /6750 xt?
@@ShadowZ_61too much, stick with 6700xt, which is still too much for strictly 1080. 6600xt is amd’s 1080p card
Generally I can see the jump of resolution from 1080p to 1440p. I however can't see the difference with 1440p to 4k gaming and it taxes the system so much.
Agree, it doesn't make sense to game in 4K unless you play on AT LEAST a 32" monitor
Well you need a bigger display otherwise it makes no sense.
0:40 absolutely.. And it's become worse these recent years, back in cs1.6 I would have no issues doing headshots on long range, but now days, the hitbox is just completely wack on 1080p
I play on my old 720p TV and i can confirm at long distance you can only see enemy player when you get hit by his first shot
I was craving 1440p for so long and was expecting something like what shroud is talking about, but surprisingly 1440p doesn't exactly feels "clear" for me, it's more of "there's no aliasing, no blur and everything is a little bigger on 27" ", in other words, it really feels like it should be "default" resolution. You forget that you've switched the next day but you also don't see aliasing and blur. I remember myself being annoyed with the blur in Doom Eternal but it's no more a problem
lol u bought the wrong monitor buddy
@@LionTheTeacher I thought so too at first lol. It's probably the fact that ppi did not went up as much as resolution did because of the screen area increase
Guys I am barely able to see this guy's blurry face on FullHD. So if 1440p more then 1080p or less?
Now that makes perfect sense why people hated Breeze so much while I absolutely loved it
lower resolution - lower input lag, also knowing where the head is while looking at blurry shape miles away is easiest skill to master in cs, but actually its harder to tell where the head is when player like sits in the window on mirage or something, higher resolutions is superior to lower resolutions but most people dont have 4090 or just want to use stretched resolutions, and like 1920x1440 makes sense but somehow noone is using it, on pro scene everyone plays on the zowie monitors that dont have 360 1440p monitors yet and its not really like they're needed now, when most of the people still sit in 1280x960, i recently upgraded to 1440x1080 which is getting more attention lately
2580x1440 have the same input lag as a 1980x1080 it only matter how good is your gpu
@@tarikwilder4917 yes, and when your gpu isnt a fucking rtx 4090 you are guaranteed to have lower input lag on lower res, the difference is bigger the more gpu bottleneck you have
@@tarikwilder4917Higher res means less fps and therefore more input lag. Running modern shooters on 2 or 4k is just not viable on most hardware if you want decent performance.
...? 3050 gives me 350 fps in valorant ....@@jR0xas so what's with this tweaking , 3050 is old gen now
I had my Dell 2560x1440 with 144Hz for the last 5 years and he is very accurate. Couldn't agree more.
Do you play on native or use lower res stretched?
the point of playing 4:3 1280x720 or a 1024x768 on a 1440/1080p monitor is that you stretch it to 16:9 or 16:10. the models are bigger on screen, therefore much more noticeable and much more easier to aim at. it does make your POV smaller but that doesnt really matter if your movement and crosshair position is right.
Stretching will only make a placebo effect and on Stretched resolution there is only one benefit (the fps). when you are on Stretched res, things are more bigger but also moves faster as hell which makes the "advantage" of bigger models useless, in lower resolutions literally you have less pixels to aim at too. I was playing at 1024x768 and literally after the first match of the day + 20 minutes of warmup feels like u are completely blind and ur eyes are tired, now playing in 1080p it's hell clearly and I'm thinking on moving to 1440p as I have a 144hz 2k.
@@jaben1824 check what pros are using ive been playing on 4:3 1024x768 stretched ever since very shortly after i started playing in 2015 i can very safely say its not a "placebo". aiming and especially awp aiming has become much easier. Originaly it helped me with hz aswell cause my old 1080p/60 could go 1024x768/75. Nowadays i own a 1440p 165hz and i still go either 1024x768 or 1280x800 in cs. I really sometimes miss the fidelity of the textures, guns so i switch to full res from time to time and the difference in ease of aim is like night and day. Also i dont want to be that guy but if 4:3 makes your players etc move too quickly and you cant keep up or are tired then im sorry to say it like this but thats a skill issue. Never had a problem with it being "too fast" after changing to 4:3 stretched
@@jaben1824 i can tell u are basic gamer. placebo LOL
@@implyVAL in fact I'm a lvl 20 in gamersclub, which will be like level 10 in faceit and yes, play with lower resolutions or 4:3 is purely personal preference and whoever that says that lower resolutions or 4:3 has a proven advantage over higher res or 16:9 its simply because lack of brain.
@@frozby5973 your source it's "I can very safely say it's not a placebo" what I mean with placebo it's that the advantage of 4:3 which is that models are more bigger are countered by the fact that everything will move faster on your screen, so the "advantage" it's being countered by the fact everything moves faster and plus to that the quality of everything is more poor. I tried a wide range of resolutions going from 800x600 to 1024 to 1440p 16:9 and in 4:3 too, and all resolutions are almost same, for play good the only thing u need is countless hours of playing and that's it, there is not magic tricks, magic res or magic configurations. The best config and the best res is the best that suits u. But a fact that cannot be denied is that you will see way much better in a 1080p or higher resolution.
This is me when I switched from 720p to 1080p. I just can't look at 720p as clear anymore. Now I'm curious about the wonders of switching from 1080p to 1440p.
Don't do it! I've been at 720p for about 9 years now from a PC my brother built me back in 2014. Recently my partner let me play Valorant on his LAPTOP which is a gaming one capable of 1440p. And it was life changing, I can never play at 720p again. I wait to play games until he's done with school so I can borrow his laptop. After a few weeks of this, i decided it is time to upgrade and that 1440p is definitely worth it! I enjoy playing 100x more now and I never realized how much performance / resolution impacted my gaming experience.
@@angelbravo9317why are you telling him to “dont do it” if its better?
@@clumblump6095 we all know it's better, but once you try the "better" you can't go back to what is "worse" anymore. I used to playing on 60hz, one day i go to my friend's house and tried his 144hz monitor, from that moment i cannot be satisfied with 60hz anymore, inside my head i was like "144hz is life, get it no matter what", that's it, the same may applies to high res and low res monitors
@@angelbravo9317you sound like someone who says hdr and ray tracing is pointless until they experience it 💀
@@kwxh No reason to go back to worse.
motion blur...that's the issue...there is a reason why every pro is playing with the zowie screen, just check tests - no screen is comparable...
just use oled
i was always blowned away how everyone is just jerking high refresh rate over getting 1440p or even 4k, seriously 144hz is already pretty good but if you can fit in your budget 1440p + 240hz thats way better than going for 360hz 1080p IMO
144hz es bueno en general, pero nada supera los 240-360hz para juegos competitivos
If you're serious about fps then a 24 inch 1080p monitor with dyac to reduce ghosting is way cleaner. Also higher refresh rate and more fps mean less input delay. A lot of people find bigger than 24 inch monitors to be distracting as well. Also most pros play on low settings regardless, they don't want sharper image quality.
Curious, on lan is everyone required to play 1920-1080 monitors?
no players can use any resolution
@@gurpreetgurpsingh I though he’s talking monitor size, not in game res. Like a 1440p monitor vs a 1920p monitor
I know you can play whatever res, but I was asking screen size
Because most 1080 are 24 inch and 1440p are 27 inch. 27 inch takes more space on LAN. Easy.
This was filmed in 2022…. When 8k resolution was a thing…
yeah most people playing at fucking 144p on 4:3 lmao. I really need to suck it up and get used to 16:9..
They do that because of du/\/\b pro players cfg... They are stuck in the past. Even with dpi on mouse.
uGh lEmMe cOpY pRoFeSsiOnAl pLaYeRs sETuP
It is really weird to talk about resolutions without specifying screen size.
Ofc 1080p on 27+ inch screen gonna look blurry compared to resolution that gives you higher pixel density.
Because 1080p it is a resolution for 24` inch screens and lower.
i play 1080 on 27 inch i down scale because i like it more in cs. my pc can handle ez wqhd
What do you mean us Delta Force players don't know what the squiggly pixels are moving across the map?
Me who plays on 30fps with half of the map disappearing 😂
so confused why even to this day tons of streamers play 1080...like they have 4090s and theyre running 1080p lmao
he basically said "who wont" and did it
"why more detail is better than less detail"
The crosshair becomes smaller on 1440p and even smaller on 4K resolution in Valorant. That’s why I had to revert back to 1080p.
Make the crosshairs bigger?
personally I find that a 27 inch 2k screen is really too big for the fps we see much better in the distance but I find that it is complicated to be responsive the larger the screen is
27 inch is still manageable, above that, I agree
I just swapped 1080p 60hz 10yo samsung tv for 1440p 160hz 1ms nano ips from LG. Even casual gamer can spot the difference, everything looks sharp and there is no ghosting pretty much.
Me at 720p just shooting at things 😂
I just switch to 27inches 1440p yesterday it’s amazing what resolution can do in these type of game
What monitor did u end up getting
That sentence doesn’t make sense
@@clumblump6095are you stupid?
wait more pixels in the monitor makes things less blurry and more clear? WOOOOOOOOW thanks for the info dude!!!11!
Your target doesn't need to have all the details in the world for you to shoot it, in fact more details will make them blend in more and there is a lot more on screen to process. I swapped back to 1280x960 for shooters from 4k just because I can more constantly hit my targets.
4k in shooters cmon bruh 😭
nah bro ... if the subject is going to be blurry, pixelated and at a distance , how are you going to hit those headshots ?? ..... the shoulder, head and chest area would all be covered within few pixels ... it would be like shooting a moving blob with no head.... and there you are looking for those headshots .
@@_Stargazer_.You get used to it. I tried sniping on battlebit on 1080p with 60% scaling with a medium range scope and you can hit headshots up to 400m if you try 😂😂😂
@@_Stargazer_. i hit more headshots in 1280x960 than 1440p so i switched back lmao
Having more details will make them blend in more? You wanna run that back? 😂
and here i am with a 720p 60hz monitor. i legit cannot see people at range at all. i just see a blur.
meanwhile 90% of the cs pro scene use those lower resolutions, 4:3 makes it more bearable, makes the crosshair look normal and not stretched vertically. i used to be a big hater of 4:3 aswell, until i tried it ofc, so much easier to see shit. 4k hours i'd hope i'd know something.
you dont point and click...it's all reaction/memory based, it doesn't matter how clear the models are. 4:3 stretched will always have the highest talent using it.
Exactly why players get closer to the screen. That's all it is.
Actually I play on 1600x900 and i can confirm that even in csgo targets are way more clear you can consider the head from the rest of targets body. Also I've played on 4:3 for a long time but honestly you don't even know what are you shooting at unless you use scoped guns.
bro doesnt know what hes saying
i used to play pubg on an old office PC. playing 720p and set my render scale hella low. if you thought you had an issue with thinking bushes were people in pubg... it's worse like that, and even worse, people look like bushes
He said absolutely right.
probably im in for a 2k resolution at 24-25 inch 165hz full cap with just monitors vsync
i believe shroud will approve this!!!
im not any esports player but i do eracing communities championships and there minimum is 37-42 and more inches need :( goes 1000-1500 euros for a good one :(
i do a lot war thunder and world of warships i need then 2k 24 or 27 inch
Clearer image = better.
What a shocking statement lmao
I've never seen 1440p monitor in my life or even 4K, but 1080p even with my bad vision looks so pixaleted, just hard to look at.
You right bro, but without money, its better to play low Settings, so you have atleast good performance in close fights!
Yeah man, that's really weird that at lower resolution you can't see as much, really weird.. Someone should explain this weird phenomenon.
It’s not weird. When objects are farther, there is less pixels to use at 1080 P. A person far away might be 30 pixels so it’s harder to make a model with 30 pixels but at 1440 P the person could be 50 pixels so it’s easier to make a model
@@clumblump6095 Dude, it was a sarcasm. 😂
I have this issue when i go down from 2160p 🤣
We still taking setup advice from the guy who said changing your mouse skates is "GG"?
what is his exact res i wanna try it because i dont know what else it is
literally said in the video 1440p. or 2k or 2560x1440
Experience. I got 240hz 1080p rnrn, and I did have the option of 2k 144hz. But thats where the experience comes to play and the longevity. Plus the prices of such 2K 240hz/360hz- my god- And to run 2K 240hz needs a beefy CPU and GPU. Which a l s o, comes at high cost. So basically go for whats will give you more for your money. DONT LISTEN TO INFLUENCERS ALWAYS!!
But wait pros can use a 1440p at lans in cs go or valorant? or they can only use 24 inch 1920x1080?
they have 1080p monitors 24. 25 inch
meanwhile me at 1024*768
Wow what a profound statement, who would’ve thought
i went from playing on 30-60fps 720p on xbox to playing on 1440p 165hz on pc now on 1080p 240hz cause a friend bumped the screen and i gotta get a new lcd and yeah i feel the same tbh 1440p so clear i was always getting asked how i saw someone and id just say 1440 lol
1440p is better at everything
depends on the game, I prefer 1080 240hz for valorant/cs/seige, but I prefer 1440 165hz for any other game
You are not bothered by the size of the screens, I suppose 24" 1080p and 27" 1440p
I swear CS2 players in particular bend over backwards convincing themselves using shittier technically is better
1080p in val i can barely see a pixel of someones head at long range
Dyac is way better to have than higher resolution. Also I prefer 24 inch for fps games. Miles better motion clarity is way more important than having more pixels, 1080p on 24 inch is already pretty fucking clear I don't really have issues ever. Not to mention the reduced input delay because of more fps and higher refresh rates.
What monitor do u use tho or u recommend for fps like valorant game?
@@homieside7551 I use the 360hz one from Zowie, their monitors have the best motion clarity by far. They have a 240hz version as well. Keep in mind that those monitors are essentially ONLY made for fps so they aren't gonna look pretty if you plan on playing other games as well.
Not anymore. The upcoming 480hz 1440p oled is going to be the real winner. Pretty much instant response times, insane colors, 1440p. No need for DyAc. You can check comparisons between the 480hz 1080p oled and dyac 2 on optimum tech’s video. Considering that, and the fact that dyac can cause eye strain, about 1-2 ms of extra input lag (based on rtings tests for reference), although such a small difference doesn’t matter and won’t be noticed at all, still good to mention. With higher resolution, better colors you will be able to acquire targets faster and therefore have even faster reaction time, most likely. All Ws for that oled
@@endcap Yes but OLED is super expensive. I'd get one but I think the price is still too high for them. I agree that OLED is great though.
It's better cuz he got payed to say it's better so companyes can sell more 2k monitors
I play at 4k 240hz and its way better than 1080p 360hz
rank?
@@Pix3lB Global Elite in CSGO
Thats probably really easy to say when you have a 90 series card.
It's not 2013 anymore, don't play at 1080p.
Bruh 1080p didn't even exist in 2003 what are you talking about, do you mean 2013 lol
@@Shockload Yes, I do. My bad.
I game on a 4:3 1440p CRT, it's nice getting rid of aliasing.
holy shit high quality makes you see more
Who would have thought that double the pixels would make things 2x as clear. weird..... -_-
Watching this in 480P
I have a gtx 1650 laptop and only play cs go.. I have a ps5 as well and im looking to buy a New monitor. Should i go for a 1440p 144hz va pr 1080p 144hz ips??. I was thinking 1440p for ps5 gaming and then i could put the resolution down when playing cs go 4:3?
If I was you I would buy a 1440p 144hz ips because of the ps5, but 4:3 would look bad on a 1440p monitor. Idk what you decide to buy, but mainly don´t buy VA panel. i swapped to ips monitor a week ago because I had 144hz fullhd VA panel and it was horrible. VAs have really bad ghosting and it drove me crazy. I am extremelly happy that I bought an ips. I would never buy a VA monitor again.
@@Jenkie6969 The G7 is a pretty good VA-Monitor but its kinda expensive. But no ghosting or input lag
@@Tanqooh VA can be good but only the expensive
Ps5 dont get 144hz even at 1080p
I think shroud needs to visit a doctor and check his eyes