@@ipo7596 2018 wasn’t the slowest but still wasn’t quick, 2019 and 2020 they have been quick, 2020 they finished 3rd in the constructors. Williams have been the slowest since 2017
This was a fun video and most likely fairly accurate. The two cars are very different, of course. The F1 Ferrari should have just under 1000HP, while the Indy car has 750. Both cars weigh about the same, while the brakes on the Ferrari are in a different league. Total budget for the Indy Car is $7 - $10 M per season, which includes about 15 - 20 team members. The F1 Ferrari has an annual budget of approximately $250M (per car) and a staff of 500, which puts things into perspective.
Key West Chris Rehm Plus ferrari gets like 100 million a year from f1 before the season even starts because they are grandfathered in.being the team with the longest consecutive time in f1.Why do they still have to charge 3 and 400,00 for their cars is beyond me.I would take a caterham and pocket the rest.
Tis the law of diminishing returns for sure. F1 is the zenith both fiscally and in performance. Plus I reckon and F1 could be quite easily configured to do ovals and beat Indy cars such is their aero management (not just downforce) and of course power advantage. Have to bring back refuelling...
What makes a difference is the downforce load which is too much higher in the F1 car. Put the two cars in an oval track and you have the opposite results.
ovals are without a doubt the hardest tracks to race at hardly any down force average speed is 220mph youve got cars either side of you a bloke on the radio saying how far away they are. alonso engineer at the 500 said that the qualy laps will be the hardest and scariest laps you have ever done in a racing car. plus the 500 is miles better than watching any f1 race i like both you get lots of proper overtakes not stupid drs go faster overtakes
Back in the 1990's I think it was Indycar and F1 shared the same circuit in their racing calendar, it was Canada. Back then the F1 did a lap in the 1:16's and the Indycar in the 1"19's. It is unfair to try and compare each vehicle as they are purpose built for a different style of racing. Indycar is predominately oval racing and F1 circuit racing. To be fair a comparison should also be done on an oval circuit to see how the Indycar then shapes up.
I wouldn't say 5/17 is predominantly oval racing. It comes down to the cars being designed to be run at a lower cost around tracks that are not as smooth as tracks F1 runs on.
The key is; this is MONZA. And F1 track. Put the cars on the Indy tri-oval & the F! car will max out at 185, while the Indy car hits 225 and just walks away.
@@pedroakira7987 Indy easily reaches 230+ mph not even having to use 6th gear. Also the cars last for 500 miles. An F1 car could only dream of being that reliable. He’s not talking shit, just spitting facts.
@@user-kf5cg6ln3l lmao each F1 car has 4 engines for the whole season so 6-7 races for an engine. A single race weekend with 3 FP sessions and a quali with the race takes up around 700 kilometers so 400-ish miles, that´s just a single weekend. As for top speed F1 cars max out at 230MPH altough that´s with circuit gear ratios, if they were to race on ovals longer gears would be used.
I have to admit, I watched this thing for a full minute before I realized it wasn't real. I was silently contemplated the pros and cons of F1 vs Indy...then took a closer look and was like...WTF? These driving sims are getting really good.
Let's not forget that indy cars have a "road course" configuration with alot less Bhp than an F1 car around 600-700 If I remember correctly while modern F1 cars are pushing 1000
I remember Pablo Montoya talking about the differences and the most impressive was circuit lap times between the two cars, 20 to 30 seconds a lap difference in the F1s favour but the 2 cars are built to different racing environments so its a bit like comparing apple's and oranges....
It's the downforce. Modern F1 cars have ludicrous amounts of downforce. And this is Monza, a speed track where downforce is not that important. Run a few laps on a track with lots of medium-speed corners and the F1 car will utterly crush the Indycar.
That DW12 in this vid is a year old too. 2018 indy they did away with all of that cladded crap. I doubt the results of a race like this would be much different though. Indy is more geared for sustaining top speeds for several hours on end as opposed to circuit racing.
Indy has more road races in the calendar than ovals, so no, it's not designed more for sustaining top speeds on ovals, since it does that far less than race on regular tracks.
@@derbigpr500 Indy is totally geared for Ovals and inparticular 1 oval..Would you like Roger Penske to tell you so?? Ive heard him say it 500 times..The race that pays the Bill's for the entire series, The Indy 500 &The Indianapolis Motor Speedway...They are not geared at all for road courses... They have a higher and much longer sustained top speed.. Despite the fact they run on many road Courses, only 1 event in the series matters...IndyCar would destroy F1 at Indianapolis and even Fernando Alonso says so and he has said it repeatedly...Two totally different types of machines for totally different fan bases...Today 08/15/2020 many IndyCars qualified at IMS over 231mpg... Only 1 Formula 1 car in history has officially went 231 and that was at Monza by Juan Pablo Montoya..The official speed record for IndyCar is almost 257 mph by Paul Tracy at Michigan International Speedway..F1 would always win on a road course..IndyCar would always win on an Oval...I'm not interested in what could be possible with modifications..Anything is possible with both series with rule changes..But the fact is The Indianapolis 500 has the highest qualifying and race speeds of any event in the world..No F1 race comes close to it...Not in Speed, not in history,( 500 is older than Lemans, Monza, Monaco.) And not in the number of paying fans who buy a ticket.... FACT!!! I don't want to hear about what might be if we do this or that to the car..You don't and I'm not speculating...We are talking about what is...
@@richarddobson3138 Is top speed everything? I find it boring. The machines arent for different fan bases they are machines built for different purposes and with different budgets. F1 is a constructors championship. Road going cars go faster given enough time to get their. Oh the oldest continuous running motor racing event is Shelsey Walsh started in 1905 and is 10 miles from where I live and the oldest purpose made racing circuit and it also has banked turns is Brooklands. Also from 1950-1960 the Indianapolis 500 was an F1 event.
@@bjs7442 No sir, it's not everything and I never said it was...You are missing the point...The point of this video was to prove F1 was faster...My point with the top speed is that F1 is not faster...That's all.. Now boring to me is slower mostly single file racing which is what F1 mostly is.. .Exciting to me is a plethora of cars entering an almost completely flat turn side be side at 240mph surrounded by concrete walls... Television has never given the Indianapolis 500 justice.. The enormity, scope, speed, and feel of the event is not transmitted well on Television and can be boring on TV. I would advise everyone to attend it once in their life. The same goes for F1...I do not feel TV gives it justice either
If only F1 races were are predictably entertaining as IndyCar road/street courses. Sometimes they are fun, and sometimes they're not (see Canada 2018). Also, I would like to see the same thing with an LMP1 car in the mix.
A more concrete example of the difference in lap times would be the one or two times that F1 and Indy cars raced at Montreal with the same track layout in the same season. I m too lazy to look it up but iirc the time difference was about 12 seconds which is totally massive at that level of competition.
Indycar: we have a 2.2Liter twin turbo v6 producing ~700hp@10500-12000 F1: hold my beer.. 1.6Liter turbocharged v6 hybrid power unit producing 900hp@10500-12000rpm
And also consider the weight differences . . . 735 kilos for Indycar . . . and for F1 - 702 kilos. But, in doing a search on the 'web, there seems to be some published variations on the minimum weight in F1.
Esta comparação está distorcida Jow, provavelmente o IndyCar teria feito suas modificações para Monza, sendo que, nas provas normais da Indy eles chegam a 370 e até passa dos 400/hora na situação.
Nonsense. F1 engines must last six racing events as in six weekends of practice, qualifying and the race. I could fill a library with what you don't know about F1.
F1 cars get set up for whatever track they race on next..so if u set a F1 car to a indy circuit track that indy car aint gunna smell that F1 car till he laps him hehe..fact 😂
Indy cars have crazy high top speeds on ovals. I would be curious to see what sort of speeds an f1 car could do with a very low downforce setup. I think the IndyCar would probably still beat it on a track like Daytona but I don't know
This comparison isn't realistic. And many comments are, umm, poorly informed. These are two VERY different formulae - different rules cover every aspect of the cars other than, perhaps, they have to have four wheels. The Indycar is DELIBERATELY constrained in many of both expensive and non-expensive areas (engine, chassis, brakes, tires, fuel...). The F1 car is also, but differently, constrained. So you will get different results (no shit Sherlock!). To claim F1 car superior is, in a way, true; due to the rules (and for some teams due to massive budgets, and unfair payments to a certain red car). A false comparison. (My extremely humble opinion)
MrStig691, F1 is cool if all you care about is some misguided loyalty to some car manufacturer. If you were actually a racing fan, you'd understand the appeal of Indycar.
Indy cars are simply built for oval tracks. Its heavier, tyres are bigger, less engine power because obviously on an oval its not needed unless you're looking to have your car fly once you tap something... Comparing the 2 VERY different cars really isn't even worth it. Can't even say that one is better than the other.
do Indy cars still have to use iron disc brakes? I know they used to. Back when Nigel Mansell went to race in Indy car in 1993 one of the things he talked about as being a huge difference was the braking power of a F1 car compared to the Indy car, I stopped watching F1 when they bought in hybrid engines and I haven't watched Indy racing for about 10 years but if Indy cars still have to run iron discs and not carbon fibre then that is a serious advantage to the F1 car right of the bat, not to mention the F1 car weighs considerably less as well.
It's nice to see an F1 car beat the Indy but.... not a fair comparison. Indy is designed more for top-speed. So the Gearbox-ratios are set accordingly. Perhaps less drag (less Wing "angle-of-attack) because downforce is of less concequence since most corners on ovals are banked. An F1 car can redline. But when slowing down for cornerd engine-revs drop below the redline. However, I think that, indeed, F1-drivetrains have tougher time during a race because of constantly up/down-shifting. Same goes for brakes. Although, constantly being at topspeed also stressed the drivetrain.
It would be interesting to see how much quicker the Indycar could be in a low downforce set up. I doubt it would be quicker than any current F1 car in any set up. The only option, for me, is to run both cars in a low downforce sim on an oval.. F1 rules...
Accurate video, proving racing is just math. One thing though, no F1 car could complete Indy distance at wide open throttle averaging 225mph (which they can't do in the first place) for 500 miles. They'd explode.
I love both Formula One and Indycar. And even though a F1 car can smoke an Indycar on a road circuit, it's the other way around on an oval course like Indianapolis. Indycars routinely reach 230-235 mph on the long straights.
its an absurd comparison, teh real diference betwen a 2017 indycar and a F1 2017 is about 4 seconds, juts take in count that an indycar weighs around 300 lbs more than an F1 car, and when an F1 car has a full tank : around 100 lbs extra, the difference per lap is around 2 or more seconds, so just do the numbers...
There is no competition in a Circuit with corners. Everyone knows an F1 car will demolish any Indy Car. The real question is Oval Circuit, can F1 cars beat an Indy car in multiple laps around an oval Circuit
impossible to do F1 vs INDYCAR competition any F1 team the pit stop is 2.7 sec, speed 380/400 km / h, every Sunday a different track in the world, the Indycar grand prix is 32.6% of the billionaire F1 teams
Type in Search. . "F1 vs indy car @ cota" You'll see the difference. And btw if a real indy car is racing in a circuit, it will be tuned to race on a circuit
Everyone should know that F1 car are faster because of the specs and rules of the two types, no surprise here , even going back to the 1970s , Fi was insane !!!
I've read the comments and would just like to add that the fastest race ever run on a closed course was won by Sam Hornish Jr. in a Chevworth powered Dallara averaging 207.151 mph (333.306 km/h) over 400 miles (643.6 km) in 2003 at Auto Club Speedway in Fontana California. Until F1 can top this they can take their "technology" and stick it where the sun won't shine.........
Now to be fair, put a speedway set up on an Indy car and have it versus an F1 car at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway... F1 car isn't ever going to sniff 235+ into turn one and keep that speed through the short shute without ending up into the wall. Seriously, this is comparing apples to oranges.
I'm surprised no one has brought up the fuel issues for the respective racers, as F1 uses gasoline and the Indy/Champ cars runs on ethanol. For those that fantasizes about a wheel-to-wheel matchup, it ain't gonna happen . . . as the sanctioning bodies can't be agreeable to the fuels used. Gasoline for open-wheel racers are prohibited at Indy . . . likewise, ethanol would not be allowed at F1 circuits. And for anyone to think that the switching of fuels could be done seamlessly by the various race engines? Not a chance! The different designs of the engine combustion chambers, the different fueling systems, and the specially designed fuel injectors/electronic mapping systems to handle those specific fuels, would make switching fuels improbable, if not impossible, for those two series race cars. Ethanol in a F1 engine would probably strangle or drown it . . . gasoline in a Indy Car engine could result with the power-plant overheating or blowing apart!
Jarod Miller it would win because even tho it's a tad slower the gear changing is much much faster in f1, only chance a indie would have is if they stick a f1 Williams car on the track lol.
Only for the first couple of laps....F1 cars have too much downforce, even those configured for faster courses like Monza. Indycar would soon wheel it in and keep going at full tilt for the duration. F1 engine would likely crack.
IndyCar would pass F1 car by end of the first lap at Indianapolis and never look back...Top sustained IndyCar speeds are 15-30 mph faster than F1 and Indy 500 is ran on top sustained speed all dsy... IndyCar would destroy F1 on an Oval
On a street circuit or road course, the F1 car obviously has a huge advantage, though I seriously doubt the one lap gap would be nearly that large. However, anyone on here who seriously believes that at Indianapolis or Pocono, with the Indycar in speedway aero trim, the F1 car could compete with the Indycar is breathing helium. No way in hell is an F1 car ever going to do 4 consecutive laps at 230+ mph on any oval. Even Indy. Two totally different beasts built for two totally different arenas. Thats it. Period.
This looks like, Mercedes vs Williams
Or all teams vs mclaren honda 2018 HAHA
@@ipo7596 2018 ain't that slow, 2015 maybe
Williams would smoke the IndyCar here too
Even worse
@@ipo7596 2018 wasn’t the slowest but still wasn’t quick, 2019 and 2020 they have been quick, 2020 they finished 3rd in the constructors. Williams have been the slowest since 2017
This was a fun video and most likely fairly accurate. The two cars are very different, of course. The F1 Ferrari should have just under 1000HP, while the Indy car has 750. Both cars weigh about the same, while the brakes on the Ferrari are in a different league. Total budget for the Indy Car is $7 - $10 M per season, which includes about 15 - 20 team members. The F1 Ferrari has an annual budget of approximately $250M (per car) and a staff of 500, which puts things into perspective.
Scrolled to far for somebody who is talking real facts and not just trash
Key West Chris Rehm Plus ferrari gets like 100 million a year from f1 before the season even starts because they are grandfathered in.being the team with the longest consecutive time in f1.Why do they still have to charge 3 and 400,00 for their cars is beyond me.I would take a caterham and pocket the rest.
Tis the law of diminishing returns for sure. F1 is the zenith both fiscally and in performance. Plus I reckon and F1 could be quite easily configured to do ovals and beat Indy cars such is their aero management (not just downforce) and of course power advantage. Have to bring back refuelling...
Actually indy cars weigh less like way less than f1 cars and have about 800bhp
Key West Chris Rehm they don’t weigh the same
Holy crap, it was half way over before I realized it was a game lol
then u need to fix your eyes
Same :D
Wow.... and you are allowed to be unsupervised?
How
Same
What makes a difference is the downforce load which is too much higher in the F1 car. Put the two cars in an oval track and you have the opposite results.
Not really fair, American drivers are still practicing turning right on a race track.....
ovals are without a doubt the hardest tracks to race at hardly any down force average speed is 220mph youve got cars either side of you a bloke on the radio saying how far away they are. alonso engineer at the 500 said that the qualy laps will be the hardest and scariest laps you have ever done in a racing car. plus the 500 is miles better than watching any f1 race i like both you get lots of proper overtakes not stupid drs go faster overtakes
PMSL
roryforham no
+roryforham no just no
roryforham actually think about what you just said
Back in the 1990's I think it was Indycar and F1 shared the same circuit in their racing calendar, it was Canada. Back then the F1 did a lap in the 1:16's and the Indycar in the 1"19's. It is unfair to try and compare each vehicle as they are purpose built for a different style of racing. Indycar is predominately oval racing and F1 circuit racing. To be fair a comparison should also be done on an oval circuit to see how the Indycar then shapes up.
The rules shape the car
Correct Freddy....that is what I pretty much said :)
There are more street and road races on the IndyCar calendar than oval races.
I wouldn't say 5/17 is predominantly oval racing. It comes down to the cars being designed to be run at a lower cost around tracks that are not as smooth as tracks F1 runs on.
The key is; this is MONZA. And F1 track. Put the cars on the Indy tri-oval & the F! car will max out at 185, while the Indy car hits 225 and just walks away.
A Formula Top Speed is much higher than 185 Miles, you're talking shit
@@pedroakira7987 Indy easily reaches 230+ mph not even having to use 6th gear. Also the cars last for 500 miles. An F1 car could only dream of being that reliable. He’s not talking shit, just spitting facts.
@@user-kf5cg6ln3l lmao each F1 car has 4 engines for the whole season so 6-7 races for an engine. A single race weekend with 3 FP sessions and a quali with the race takes up around 700 kilometers so 400-ish miles, that´s just a single weekend. As for top speed F1 cars max out at 230MPH altough that´s with circuit gear ratios, if they were to race on ovals longer gears would be used.
I have to admit, I watched this thing for a full minute before I realized it wasn't real. I was silently contemplated the pros and cons of F1 vs Indy...then took a closer look and was like...WTF? These driving sims are getting really good.
what mod of indycar is used?
What mod is that? The IndyCar one)
Shall we race the Indycar against 2017 McLaren Honda ?
gp2 engine!
At least in Indycar Honda can win
didn’t know indicars could turn right 😂
Gavino Paulio the indycar schedule only has 5 oval races dumbass. Look at the schedule right now
ThatoneElliottfan9 cheer up grumpy pants. Ever heard of banter.
Does anyone know how to make to AI cats race and just spectate in asseto corsa
Stock Car Brasil VS Um Nascar Monster Energy Cup Series
hahahaha the race was officially after the initial acceleration....
Let's not forget that indy cars have a "road course" configuration with alot less Bhp than an F1 car around 600-700 If I remember correctly while modern F1 cars are pushing 1000
Guys this is a video game
exiledrabbit. Its a simulation to simulate real life.😩
exiledrabbit REALLY?!
you don't say?!??
almost hard to tell in the first few seconds.
... And Indy STILL looks more exciting! :)
Where i Chan Download this
took me like a minute to realise this was a video game
I remember Pablo Montoya talking about the differences and the most impressive was circuit lap times between the two cars, 20 to 30 seconds a lap difference in the F1s favour but the 2 cars are built to different racing environments so its a bit like comparing apple's and oranges....
@Ground Hog Go email Montoya and tell him, you know more about those two cars than he does.
It's the downforce. Modern F1 cars have ludicrous amounts of downforce. And this is Monza, a speed track where downforce is not that important. Run a few laps on a track with lots of medium-speed corners and the F1 car will utterly crush the Indycar.
Tim Suetens the f1 car did crush the Indy CAD
Who's sponsorship is the Green monza?
That DW12 in this vid is a year old too. 2018 indy they did away with all of that cladded crap. I doubt the results of a race like this would be much different though. Indy is more geared for sustaining top speeds for several hours on end as opposed to circuit racing.
Indy has more road races in the calendar than ovals, so no, it's not designed more for sustaining top speeds on ovals, since it does that far less than race on regular tracks.
@@derbigpr500 Indy is totally geared for Ovals and inparticular 1 oval..Would you like Roger Penske to tell you so?? Ive heard him say it 500 times..The race that pays the Bill's for the entire series, The Indy 500 &The Indianapolis Motor Speedway...They are not geared at all for road courses... They have a higher and much longer sustained top speed..
Despite the fact they run on many road Courses, only 1 event in the series matters...IndyCar would destroy F1 at Indianapolis and even Fernando Alonso says so and he has said it repeatedly...Two totally different types of machines for totally different fan bases...Today 08/15/2020 many IndyCars qualified at IMS over 231mpg... Only 1 Formula 1 car in history has officially went 231 and that was at Monza by Juan Pablo Montoya..The official speed record for IndyCar is almost 257 mph by Paul Tracy at Michigan International Speedway..F1 would always win on a road course..IndyCar would always win on an Oval...I'm not interested in what could be possible with modifications..Anything is possible with both series with rule changes..But the fact is The Indianapolis 500 has the highest qualifying and race speeds of any event in the world..No F1 race comes close to it...Not in Speed, not in history,( 500 is older than Lemans, Monza, Monaco.)
And not in the number of paying fans who buy a ticket....
FACT!!! I don't want to hear about what might be if we do this or that to the car..You don't and I'm not speculating...We are talking about what is...
@@richarddobson3138 Spot on
@@richarddobson3138 Is top speed everything? I find it boring. The machines arent for different fan bases they are machines built for different purposes and with different budgets. F1 is a constructors championship. Road going cars go faster given enough time to get their. Oh the oldest continuous running motor racing event is Shelsey Walsh started in 1905 and is 10 miles from where I live and the oldest purpose made racing circuit and it also has banked turns is Brooklands. Also from 1950-1960 the Indianapolis 500 was an F1 event.
@@bjs7442 No sir, it's not everything and I never said it was...You are missing the point...The point of this video was to prove F1 was faster...My point with the top speed is that F1 is not faster...That's all.. Now boring to me is slower mostly single file racing which is what F1 mostly is.. .Exciting to me is a plethora of cars entering an almost completely flat turn side be side at 240mph surrounded by concrete walls... Television has never given the Indianapolis 500 justice.. The enormity, scope, speed, and feel of the event is not transmitted well on Television and can be boring on TV.
I would advise everyone to attend it once in their life. The same goes for F1...I do not feel TV gives it justice either
a RL test would be nice
If only F1 races were are predictably entertaining as IndyCar road/street courses. Sometimes they are fun, and sometimes they're not (see Canada 2018). Also, I would like to see the same thing with an LMP1 car in the mix.
Wow! Is that real-time rendering or a months-in-a-cluster scripted animation?
Next...Ferrari F1 2018 vs Shopping Trolley. This time it will be closer!
John Doe specially with Ferrari’s strategy
Trolley might actually win
Obviously only if it’s from Asda
Tesco and Sainsbury’s just on the same level
@@richardhobbs7360 shopping trolley has better straight line speed then the 2020 Ferrari f1 car
Putiz até metade da volta achei que fosse real... Video game está foda msm e eu velho... Kkk
It's okay, F1 can have a faster car, IndyCar can have passing.
F1 has right turns though
@@alfredrnstrand2415 So does IndyCar...
It's a dumb comparison anyway.
Only because if some bozo in the back who isn't in contention gets in an accident and you bunch them up.
*distant oof*
A more concrete example of the difference in lap times would be the one or two times that F1 and Indy cars raced at Montreal with the same track layout in the same season. I m too lazy to look it up but iirc the time difference was about 12 seconds which is totally massive at that level of competition.
In the early 2000's while racing on the same circuit, there was about a 6 second difference between the fastest F1 laps and fastest Champ Car laps.
I’ll take your word for it. I knew it was either 7.5 or 12 seconds.
6 seconds it was. An early 2000s Minardi would have outpaced a top end Champ Car by about a second.
2002 races: F1 pole position 1:12.8 champ car pole position 1:18.9
Same layout, similar weather conditions.
True but obviously other mitigating factors: The champ cars weighed 27% more than than the F1 cars and used different tires.
who was here to see the comment war?
Indy cars can turn right???
What about part 2 on an IndyCar track??
Isn't that a device for hitching a plough on the back of the green one?..virtual plough.
Exactly how I imagined it would be.
which game is this ?
I think it would be a much closer contest if the present day Indycar went up against an F1 car from the 2008 season.
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Indycar: we have a 2.2Liter twin turbo v6 producing ~700hp@10500-12000
F1: hold my beer.. 1.6Liter turbocharged v6 hybrid power unit producing 900hp@10500-12000rpm
And also consider the weight differences . . . 735 kilos for Indycar . . . and for F1 - 702 kilos. But, in doing a search on the 'web, there seems to be some published variations on the minimum weight in F1.
Caraca que massa !!!! Como vc consegui ?
wat game is?
ps 4?
Esta comparação está distorcida Jow, provavelmente o IndyCar teria feito suas modificações para Monza, sendo que, nas provas normais da Indy eles chegam a 370 e até passa dos 400/hora na situação.
yes, yes, but the indy doesn't sound like my vacuum cleaner
I'd like to see F1 vs Indy Cart Indianapolis speedway
Joseph Barnes sure, just extend the gear ratios on the F1 car and flatten the wings and it'll reach 245mph no problem maybe more
An F1 engine couldn't handle the strain, plus the aerodynamics is wrong
What do you mean the aero is wrong?? I said flatten the wings out to reduce drag and... A fuck it its not worth it...
F1 fucking Indy cars all night long,
Cum shot .😁
Nonsense. F1 engines must last six racing events as in six weekends of practice, qualifying and the race. I could fill a library with what you don't know about F1.
Play Station?
Thought i would see the real thing instead of a recording of the game :(
What video game is that? Forza? F1? It's beautiful; I want it.
assetto corsa, buy only if u have a wheel
Grand theft auto 11
F1 cars get set up for whatever track they race on next..so if u set a F1 car to a indy circuit track that indy car aint gunna smell that F1 car till he laps him hehe..fact 😂
Don't IndyCars have a higher top speed though? I thought they were designed for sustaining high speeds on oval tracks...
Indy cars have crazy high top speeds on ovals. I would be curious to see what sort of speeds an f1 car could do with a very low downforce setup. I think the IndyCar would probably still beat it on a track like Daytona but I don't know
what is IndyCar?
This comparison isn't realistic. And many comments are, umm, poorly informed.
These are two VERY different formulae - different rules cover every aspect of the cars other than, perhaps, they have to have four wheels.
The Indycar is DELIBERATELY constrained in many of both expensive and non-expensive areas (engine, chassis, brakes, tires, fuel...). The F1 car is also, but differently, constrained. So you will get different results (no shit Sherlock!).
To claim F1 car superior is, in a way, true; due to the rules (and for some teams due to massive budgets, and unfair payments to a certain red car).
A false comparison.
(My extremely humble opinion)
MrStig691 he doesn't sound bitter at all. That was as objective an opinion as you can get.
MrStig691 F1 has better cars, but has better races? We watch races.
MrStig691, F1 is cool if all you care about is some misguided loyalty to some car manufacturer. If you were actually a racing fan, you'd understand the appeal of Indycar.
F1 vs F-Zero?
Which game? Pls tell someone
1 mill views, dude that's awesome!!!
significant difference in downforce setup between the two
please, make indycar vs old f1 cars (1996/1997)
Laugh all you want but which series has better racing,which series has more than 3 drivers who can win?
power to weight ratio will not be denied.
It took me far too long to realise this is a game.
Indy cars are simply built for oval tracks. Its heavier, tyres are bigger, less engine power because obviously on an oval its not needed unless you're looking to have your car fly once you tap something... Comparing the 2 VERY different cars really isn't even worth it. Can't even say that one is better than the other.
do Indy cars still have to use iron disc brakes? I know they used to. Back when Nigel Mansell went to race in Indy car in 1993 one of the things he talked about as being a huge difference was the braking power of a F1 car compared to the Indy car, I stopped watching F1 when they bought in hybrid engines and I haven't watched Indy racing for about 10 years but if Indy cars still have to run iron discs and not carbon fibre then that is a serious advantage to the F1 car right of the bat, not to mention the F1 car weighs considerably less as well.
www.motorsport.com/indycar/news/how-pfc-stepped-up-braking-performance-for-2018-indycar-976865/
People that think Indycars only turn left are the same people who think the earth is flat.
This pretty accurate. It's not even funny how fast the F1 is over the Indy
It's nice to see an F1 car beat the Indy but.... not a fair comparison.
Indy is designed more for top-speed. So the Gearbox-ratios are set accordingly. Perhaps less drag (less Wing "angle-of-attack) because downforce is of less concequence since most corners on ovals are banked.
An F1 car can redline. But when slowing down for cornerd engine-revs drop below the redline. However, I think that, indeed, F1-drivetrains have tougher time during a race because of constantly up/down-shifting. Same goes for brakes. Although, constantly being at topspeed also stressed the drivetrain.
F2 level？
lol, it took me a lil while to see this was a computer game, nice gfx :)
It would be interesting to see how much quicker the Indycar could be in a low downforce set up. I doubt it would be quicker than any current F1 car in any set up.
The only option, for me, is to run both cars in a low downforce sim on an oval..
F1 rules...
Mr_Penna son and what about all the engine restriction rule f1 engine manufacturers have to follow
Niwesh Lekhak. What about them?? Indycar has a set of ebgine rules too!
It would be great to see something like this in real life.
I bet Indycar would pull the license of any team that tried it.
Accurate video, proving racing is just math. One thing though, no F1 car could complete Indy distance at wide open throttle averaging 225mph (which they can't do in the first place) for 500 miles. They'd explode.
But the indycar should have much top speed than the f1 right?
I love both Formula One and Indycar. And even though a F1 car can smoke an Indycar on a road circuit, it's the other way around on an oval course like Indianapolis. Indycars routinely reach 230-235 mph on the long straights.
i thought i was watching a footage. Damn graphics
you are a read that is obviously a game
Took me about a minute to figure out that it is a video game. Impressive
Ronny Diehl i want this game whatever it is
0.50 Alonso?
His suit is white so no :P
its an absurd comparison, teh real diference betwen a 2017 indycar and a F1 2017 is about 4 seconds, juts take in count that an indycar weighs around 300 lbs more than an F1 car, and when an F1 car has a full tank : around 100 lbs extra, the difference per lap is around 2 or more seconds, so just do the numbers...
Is that a green Mclaren Honda?
😂😂👍🏻
There is no competition in a Circuit with corners. Everyone knows an F1 car will demolish any Indy Car.
The real question is Oval Circuit, can F1 cars beat an Indy car in multiple laps around an oval Circuit
impossible to do F1 vs INDYCAR competition any F1 team the pit stop is 2.7 sec, speed 380/400 km / h, every Sunday a different track in the world, the Indycar grand prix is 32.6% of the billionaire F1 teams
Kinda pointless if you don’t give the Indy a similar tune as the F1, it performs just the same in the turns.
Type in Search. . "F1 vs indy car @ cota"
You'll see the difference. And btw if a real indy car is racing in a circuit, it will be tuned to race on a circuit
Everyone should know that F1 car are faster because of the specs and rules of the two types, no surprise here , even going back to the 1970s , Fi was insane !!!
I've read the comments and would just like to add that the fastest race ever run on a closed course was won by Sam Hornish Jr. in a Chevworth powered Dallara averaging 207.151 mph (333.306 km/h) over 400 miles (643.6 km) in 2003 at Auto Club Speedway in Fontana California. Until F1 can top this they can take their "technology" and stick it where the sun won't shine.........
Now to be fair, put a speedway set up on an Indy car and have it versus an F1 car at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway... F1 car isn't ever going to sniff 235+ into turn one and keep that speed through the short shute without ending up into the wall.
Seriously, this is comparing apples to oranges.
Both are mods which mean the results aren't as accurate however regardless an F1 would still come on top
I'm surprised no one has brought up the fuel issues for the respective racers, as F1 uses gasoline and the Indy/Champ cars runs on ethanol. For those that fantasizes about a wheel-to-wheel matchup, it ain't gonna happen . . . as the sanctioning bodies can't be agreeable to the fuels used. Gasoline for open-wheel racers are prohibited at Indy . . . likewise, ethanol would not be allowed at F1 circuits.
And for anyone to think that the switching of fuels could be done seamlessly by the various race engines? Not a chance! The different designs of the engine combustion chambers, the different fueling systems, and the specially designed fuel injectors/electronic mapping systems to handle those specific fuels, would make switching fuels improbable, if not impossible, for those two series race cars. Ethanol in a F1 engine would probably strangle or drown it . . . gasoline in a Indy Car engine could result with the power-plant overheating or blowing apart!
At least IndyCars don't have the halo hurrr durrr
This comments section is horrendous.
James Branstetter so it’s better with a broken neck?
What's the point of indy cars that they can't even go faster than 220 mph for long
Wtf aerodynamic is that on the IndyCar it's monstrous
for a second there i taught that was real FX getting more real by the year
you must b visually impaired i feel bad for you
0:30 There a car in start/finish
Anggara Craft it’s the after image of the Ferrari
Would love to see them match up on an oval... flat out speed throughout, F1 car still probably will hold its own if not win.
Jarod Miller it would win because even tho it's a tad slower the gear changing is much much faster in f1, only chance a indie would have is if they stick a f1 Williams car on the track lol.
Only for the first couple of laps....F1 cars have too much downforce, even those configured for faster courses like Monza. Indycar would soon wheel it in and keep going at full tilt for the duration.
F1 engine would likely crack.
IndyCar would pass F1 car by end of the first lap at Indianapolis and never look back...Top sustained IndyCar speeds are 15-30 mph faster than F1 and Indy 500 is ran on top sustained speed all dsy... IndyCar would destroy F1 on an Oval
What’s the point of showing this apart from as computer graphics demonstration
I'm an Aussie, bring back the CHAMP CARS !!!!!
On a street circuit or road course, the F1 car obviously has a huge advantage, though I seriously doubt the one lap gap would be nearly that large.
However, anyone on here who seriously believes that at Indianapolis or Pocono, with the Indycar in speedway aero trim, the F1 car could compete with the Indycar is breathing helium. No way in hell is an F1 car ever going to do 4 consecutive laps at 230+ mph on any oval. Even Indy.
Two totally different beasts built for two totally different arenas. Thats it. Period.
wait what?when Alonso became Marshall? 0.50
This is not fair race. Let’s have a real race on Indianapolis 500 oval track. That’s a man’s race speed over 220mph. And, see who wins. No contest
Indycar driver: "F*** you Terrence! F*** you and your 3rd ball!"
Why don't they do the real thing two teams 1 from formula 1 and 1 from Indy and do a real 10 or 20 lap challenge to see what car wins
One is a spec series and one is a manufacturers' championship.
Because weight is heavy, an Indy car thinks that it is natural to turn out such.
IndyCar 2017??
Leclerc or vettel?
The 2020 f1 ferrari drives like the indy car😀