I have the mk 1 version of this lens which is optically the same as the mk 2 but without stabilisation. It has been used on Early EP2 and then the EM5 only a few days after its release and then on the EM1 again a few days after its release, where it stays most of the time as a great walk around lens and Im quite happy to let it stay on the EM1 all the time. I find it to be as good as I need it to be and have some fine A3 and bigger prints from it. This lens is a hidden gem in use and sharper than many of my vintage primes. I have no intention of updating it or changing to an alternative lens or brand for general use. Its not the fastest lens but I like subject and location context in my backgrounds (except portraits) so the DOF is fine and I don't do stars and when its dark, I'm feet up with a beer, what else?
I recently picked up this lens on a last one clearance special and was pleasantly surprised by its performance. So light and compact on my em5 mkii body compared to my 40mm to 150mm f2.8 pro. I love the build and image quality of my pro lens but it's not so practical to always have on you. Don't let the f4 -f5.6 scare you off this lens especially if you are on a budget and aren't planning to chase fast moving subjects in low light. I managed to find it for $349 Aussie dollars which was an absolute bargain but it's definitely worth the full price if you want a general walk around all in one option. Thanks for the review as it helped me make the decision to grab the lens even though I already have some pro options in my bag.
Some nice shots there Patrick… I like that you compared the close up ability with other lenses and I love your music. I was looking for a travel lens smaller in size than my Panasonic 45-200 however your review was enough for me to decide not to buy this lens. Thank you… you have saved me some money😊
Well, the quality of the kits 14+42mm plus the 40-150mm overpass this 14-150mm. it's true that with this lens you won't need to interchange in your camera body but at a cost in sharpness and chromatic aberrations.
I have had a lot of M 4/3 lenses and cameras, I make it my policy not to mix camera and glass manufacturer as they don't correct automatically. I am going to pair the one I have bought used with an EM1 ii, to leave in my car for Justin Case.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
great review with minimal chat but great pictures, I have this lens myself so helpful to me, thank you very much.
Your aperture is only as you stated for depth of field. It is 4-5.6 for what really matters, light gathering.
Many people don't knw it . thanks for making it clear.
I have the mk 1 version of this lens which is optically the same as the mk 2 but without stabilisation.
It has been used on Early EP2 and then the EM5 only a few days after its release and then on the EM1 again a few days after its release, where it stays most of the time as a great walk around lens and Im quite happy to let it stay on the EM1 all the time. I find it to be as good as I need it to be and have some fine A3 and bigger prints from it. This lens is a hidden gem in use and sharper than many of my vintage primes. I have no intention of updating it or changing to an alternative lens or brand for general use. Its not the fastest lens but I like subject and location context in my backgrounds (except portraits) so the DOF is fine and I don't do stars and when its dark, I'm feet up with a beer, what else?
I recently picked up this lens on a last one clearance special and was pleasantly surprised by its performance.
So light and compact on my em5 mkii body compared to my 40mm to 150mm f2.8 pro.
I love the build and image quality of my pro lens but it's not so practical to always have on you.
Don't let the f4 -f5.6 scare you off this lens especially if you are on a budget and aren't planning to chase fast moving subjects in low light.
I managed to find it for $349 Aussie dollars which was an absolute bargain but it's definitely worth the full price if you want a general walk around all in one option.
Thanks for the review as it helped me make the decision to grab the lens even though I already have some pro options in my bag.
Some nice shots there Patrick… I like that you compared the close up ability with other lenses and I love your music. I was looking for a travel lens smaller in size than my Panasonic 45-200 however your review was enough for me to decide not to buy this lens. Thank you… you have saved me some money😊
very good review
Well, the quality of the kits 14+42mm plus the 40-150mm overpass this 14-150mm. it's true that with this lens you won't need to interchange in your camera body but at a cost in sharpness and chromatic aberrations.
Yes but you have also weather sealing and all in one. When I want to prioritize output, I take 12-100/4 :)
I have had a lot of M 4/3 lenses and cameras, I make it my policy not to mix camera and glass manufacturer as they don't correct automatically. I am going to pair the one I have bought used with an EM1 ii, to leave in my car for Justin Case.
how is the lens inserted into the lumix? Sir
The mount is the same as the Olympus. It just screws in.
I think I might have the mark 1…. anyone know what’s the difference??
Weather sealing and a different coating, I think those are the only differences. Oh and the new one looks quite a bit nicer 😉
A great review thanks. You need to fix the title. It shows 14-150 instead if 12-150mm.
It's not 12-150, it's a 14-150, the mistake was in the video, not the title ;). They do make a 12-100 f/4, but that's a whole different beast.
Mystical music.....no