Nice! Your missing the open E "drone" in the descending riff on Just Like Heaven though. I used to make the same mistake as well, when I first played the song.
@@pistolaola Yeah, but his original comment had nothing to do with you. The title of said video is, “80’s songs”. His original comment was correct. You’re also correct. but it has nothing to do with his comment.
@@davidgray2845 His original comment suggested that those aren't 80's songs so that's why I pointed out that by those two performers the songs were again very popular in the 80's so in that way it has to do with his comment. All good anyways. :)
@@DemnRaig80 the four note rule is a legal precedent; if the same 4 notes with the same or very similar timing are copied, it's infringement. That's all it takes. There were 8 notes played in the same sequence as the song I mentioned - the entire second bar - and you're saying it is a stretch to allege plagiarism? For the sake of copyright, the same note repeated is the same as different notes. For instance, the first 4 notes of Beethoven's fifth may not be played in a similar sequence and tempo without infringing, despite the fact that there are only two different notes in the sequence. Sorry your little insult did not get the intended result.
@@Karma-qt4jiThey're correct in saying it's only half the riff, and therefore not most. It's a two bar riff - the first bar is a C Major strummed three times, the second is the part that sounds like Evoid. So why haven't Evoid sued INXS (and the dozen or so other artists who have sampled INXS)? I mean the riff is made up of three, three note chords, and contains eight strums, so it's actually 24 notes (if you want to be pedantic, and you certainly come across as the type) - way more than is needed for the 4 note rule, right? Well, you see, the rule applies to the overarching melody of the piece, which is just three descending notes - E>D#>C#. For the record, I don't think INXS copied Evoid. They had already played around with "moving the pinky" along the high E string on songs like Original Sin. It's common for guitarists to hit on progressions like these when they are trying to come up with funky sounding pieces. Or even beginners who are experimenting, and trying to "expand" chords. I can absolutely guarantee you that there is some kid somewhere who is "discovering" this piece (or something very similar) at this very moment, on their guitar.
@@declanfitzpatrick8268 I don't dispute any of that at all, I was merely pointing out that the entire second bar was pretty much a like for like copy.Not only was it the chord progression along the lines you mentioned, but also the pattern and rhythm. There are enough similarities for a regular music lover like myself to say "hol' up!" and judging by the Katy Perry Dark Horse original ruling (thank God sanity prevailed at the end!!), there was enough here for the accusation to be made. Why didn't Evoid sue? Maybe they liked what INXS did with it, maybe they gave permission, maybe they just didn't care. Personally I don't care either - I like both songs and can appreciate how similar melodies / progressions can enhance different songs in different ways. Of course the difference between you and the "they" you were talking about, is the fact that you were decent enough to make a reasoned argument without resorting to insults lol. For that, you have my respect.
Man, that Bill Withers tune at 3:43 is tasty! They don’t write em like that for pop radio anymore. 👍
Love that Knight Rider made the cut! 🤘🏻🤘🏻🤘🏻
Amazing riffs !!🙏🏼🤩 amazing job Victor. I also like your shirt at the beginning👍🏻💓
Thank U so Much Stela 🙏🎸😎
Nice! Your missing the open E "drone" in the descending riff on Just Like Heaven though. I used to make the same mistake as well, when I first played the song.
Thank you for lessons!
U’ re Welcome 😎🎸🙏
thanks this is very helpful
You’ re Welcome 😎🙏🎸
La Bamba is from 50's, I love rock and roll is from 70's.
La Bamba performed by Los Lobos is from 1987. I Love Rock N Roll performed by Joan Jett & The Blackhearts is from 1982.
@@pistolaola
La Bamba orginally performed by Ritchie Valens is from 1958. I Love Rock N Roll orginally performed by The Arrows is from 1975.
@@janveturilo Yes I know but I said that those songs were also made popular in the 80’s by different performers.
@@pistolaola Yeah, but his original comment had nothing to do with you. The title of said video is, “80’s songs”. His original comment was correct. You’re also correct. but it has nothing to do with his comment.
@@davidgray2845 His original comment suggested that those aren't 80's songs so that's why I pointed out that by those two performers the songs were again very popular in the 80's so in that way it has to do with his comment.
All good anyways. :)
Excellent j'adore.. Toujours au top 👍👏😃
Merci beaucoup 🙏🎶😎
More please 🙏 ❤
sympa cette petite compilation
, beat it se joue un demi ton en dessous dans la version album par Steve Lukater ?
Oui 👍
good stuff! good video! subscribed!
Thank U very much 🙏🎸😎
Nice job man
Thank U very Much
Brilliant 😊
Merci beaucoup 🙏🎸😎
What kind of guitar is that? I mean what brand/company?
Custom77 China Girl. It’ s a French mark
Super! Merci !👌👍
Avec plaisir 🙏🎸😎
La Bamba?
Brother where's money for nothing
Ah man no Huey Lewis and The News??
Patrick bateman? That you?
😅
Ça ne me rajeunit pas 😂 😂 😂
INXS stole most of that riff from Evoid - Junk Jive, released in 1983.
Half the riff is not MOST by any means. What a stretch Mr Armstrong.
@@DemnRaig80 the four note rule is a legal precedent; if the same 4 notes with the same or very similar timing are copied, it's infringement. That's all it takes. There were 8 notes played in the same sequence as the song I mentioned - the entire second bar - and you're saying it is a stretch to allege plagiarism?
For the sake of copyright, the same note repeated is the same as different notes. For instance, the first 4 notes of Beethoven's fifth may not be played in a similar sequence and tempo without infringing, despite the fact that there are only two different notes in the sequence.
Sorry your little insult did not get the intended result.
@@Karma-qt4jiThey're correct in saying it's only half the riff, and therefore not most. It's a two bar riff - the first bar is a C Major strummed three times, the second is the part that sounds like Evoid. So why haven't Evoid sued INXS (and the dozen or so other artists who have sampled INXS)? I mean the riff is made up of three, three note chords, and contains eight strums, so it's actually 24 notes (if you want to be pedantic, and you certainly come across as the type) - way more than is needed for the 4 note rule, right? Well, you see, the rule applies to the overarching melody of the piece, which is just three descending notes - E>D#>C#.
For the record, I don't think INXS copied Evoid. They had already played around with "moving the pinky" along the high E string on songs like Original Sin. It's common for guitarists to hit on progressions like these when they are trying to come up with funky sounding pieces. Or even beginners who are experimenting, and trying to "expand" chords. I can absolutely guarantee you that there is some kid somewhere who is "discovering" this piece (or something very similar) at this very moment, on their guitar.
@@declanfitzpatrick8268 I don't dispute any of that at all, I was merely pointing out that the entire second bar was pretty much a like for like copy.Not only was it the chord progression along the lines you mentioned, but also the pattern and rhythm. There are enough similarities for a regular music lover like myself to say "hol' up!" and judging by the Katy Perry Dark Horse original ruling (thank God sanity prevailed at the end!!), there was enough here for the accusation to be made.
Why didn't Evoid sue? Maybe they liked what INXS did with it, maybe they gave permission, maybe they just didn't care. Personally I don't care either - I like both songs and can appreciate how similar melodies / progressions can enhance different songs in different ways.
Of course the difference between you and the "they" you were talking about, is the fact that you were decent enough to make a reasoned argument without resorting to insults lol. For that, you have my respect.
La Bamba is NOT an 80s song
He's playing the Los Lobos version, which was 1987
@@declanfitzpatrick8268 same song as Ritchie Valens ...... just like sweet home Chicago isn't an 80s song either.
Way to recycle..what.. your whole other video?
Sorry, it gets better. And I forgot I like you once I saw your face