The title sounds like a story the elements would tell at thanksgiving “Hey, Oxygen.” *”What now, carbon?”* “Hehehe...” *”What?!”* “Remember that time you almost killed everything?” *”Shut up.”*
Not really, we still have plenty of oxygen, and that's in no danger. And there's no reason we can't survive global warming either. These doom and gloom people say global warming will kill everything forget how life flourished back on Earth when CO2 levels were above 400ppm. But things will get nastier with more disease, more storms and higher mortality rate all around.
@@JimmyMon666 Hence being "suffocated by our own waste"... Even if some of us make it through the other end alive, humanity as we know it will still perish 🤷
Patterns, patterns. We evolved to seek them for a reason. Why? Because observing them works pretty well 😅 We're going to kill off a huge amount of species and probably most (if not all) of our population, then everything will adjust and bounce back.
One of my fantasies would be to have a time machine (with a decent life support system) to visit Earth at any stage in its history. Earth was a rocky and volcanic hellhole, a hot green water world, a hot red water world and a giant snowball. These sound like cool sci-fi locations for an epic space opera and it delights my inner geek.
That would be most of people's dreams, including me. yet you need to travel faster than light do to it. but it doesn't means that is impossible. they have proved time travel is "mathematically possible", not because we don't create time machines means that is impossible. but really hard.
Faster then light travel making you go back in time is a fictional idea. From the observer's point of view if an object traveled faster then light towards them it would seem like the object is going back in time. They will see the object arrive 1st and then "travel" backwards as earlier and earlier light hits the viewer. These is disregarding all the weird things that will happen with ftl travel but going back in time is not one of the things even though to an observer it looks like the object split into two, one object that traveled towards them and one object that is traveling away from them and going "back" in time. However, if you could go faster then light, you can still travel away from Earth to see what it looked like in the past. So do not be too disappointed.
@@darrylweathers7361 The northern and southern lights are not holes. They are disturbances from solar radiation. It doesn't penetrate or cause holes in the ozone, it just distortion patterns that diminish after the event passes.
Why did you skip the idea that the reason life on Earth survived the Oxygen Catastrophe is because aerobic bacteria evolved before the cyanobacteria could've gone extinct. Aerobic Bacteria are able to use oxygen + eating sugars from cyanobacteria for respiration, as opposed to making sugars with carbon dioxide + sunlight to then use. The existence of both in tandem is what causes our current atmosphere to balance somewhere other than completely CO2 or completely O2.
· 0xFFF1 Well Cyano Bacteria existed for only 300 million years when this was happening which possibly meant that they had a lot of work to do in using it up
+. 0xFFF1 : thanks for the comment. It occurred to me at the end of the video that it wasn't thoroughly explained why the oxygen didn't just continue to get greater to the point of complete mass extinction.
@@fobbitoperator3620 Stupid people? You're definitely not one of those people, though. Right? I'm sure there's a lot that you don't know. In reality, everyone is stupid. Just depends on the subject. Shakespeare once said, " The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool". Chew on that for a minute, smart guy.
Always remember folks, humans aren't the first organisms whose rise resulted in a mass extinction. It's happened before, and it's happening again. But also know this: Though many things we know and love may soon come to an end, when nature finds its new equilibrium, if things go well, life may evolve to be more diverse and beautiful than ever before.
The recovery part - sadly not. At least, not under any normal definition of lifetime. I wouldn't rule out the emergence of technologies that could indefinitely extend lifespans, store people in a dormant state for the long term, or both. The mass extinction is already very much underway though, and has been for a while. We will see that part ramp up noticeably within our lifetimes.
Seamus Callaghan not even 1 percent of species in last 150 years does not constitute a mass extinction. A good portion of those extinctions have happened without any human intervention.
Mass extinctions rarely happen in as few as 150 years. Most have taken thousands, as far as we can tell. Current extinction rates are 1000 to 10,000 times higher than normal background rates - the highest they've been since the K-T extinction. That
Unfortunately because of their semi-permeable skin the amphibians are on the front line...our toxins transfer directly through their skin and cause horrific genetic mutations.
You know what would be an interesting episode? Could you guys please go through the rock layers in a place with well-known strata and explain the geological periods that created them? Many people have heard that "this era happened so many years ago", but not as much "the remnants of this era can be seen so many meters down from the surface".
It might be a good idea - that way people might know what words like "Ordovician", "Hadean" and "Eocene" mean without having to enroll in a Historical Geology course at their local University.
The more and more I study life and how incredibly tough it is, AND the fact that life *terraformed* this planet and enabled life as we know it. The more I realize how easy it would be to start elsewhere in the universe, and in no small degree
Sometimes it makes u wonder, where did its all started ? Does unbiological thing enable life or did life actually is not only the concept that we know. Does inanimate things actually has life, omg my brain :((
@@slinkerdeer think you should study more then. The chances of the existence of life at some point in time in another planet is veeeery slim and the chances of it actualy surviving is almost to none.
I love how in the last few decades the story of "snowball earth" has grown from a little fringe theory and I've got to watch more and more details cone together.
"That Time Oxygen Almost Killed Everything" I would rearrange this to - "That Time Oxygen killed almost everything" Cause it didn't just "almost kill", oxygen killed a lot and almost everything.
Climate change deniers: "little humans couldn't possibly be having such a drastic effect on the planet" Microscopic bacteria: *"I'm about to ruin this man's whole career"*
"Climate change deniers", Snotty words from so called intelligent people determined to prove they are right at any cost. But hey, get rid of your computer, phone, car and anything else and I will join you in misery in a cave you twat.
Lol, I turned into my long past 10 y/o self when she said, "...farted out oxygen."! I love how this channel saves the "big words" for naming names and the rest of the time uses a language all ages can understand and relate too. :)
I've enjoyed every episode so far. I would really like you to discuss the evolution of grasses. I remember my introduction to agriculture professor pointing out that they haven't been around all that long. I always try to imagine a world without grass and what that would really look like. Also, as a geologist, thank you for talking about BIFs. They're the coolest.
This channel is just so fascinating. I love that I have the opportunity to watch an Eons video at any point of the day, and that I can learn so many things I don’t get a chance to while at school. Thanks so much for teaching me new things every day!
This is what makes me believe that life on different planets don't have to have the same chemistry as Earth for there to be life. Earth wasn't always covered in Carbon Dioxide and Oxygen.
Marissa Ojeda I do think that complex life would probably require a similarly powerful energy source to O2, however. Aerobic respiration produces several times more energy than anaerobic processes, so without it, life would have to run on much thriftier energy strategies, possibly forbidding the development of multicellular life
3:41 "They needed CO2 to survive. So they were basically being suffocated by their own waste (oxygen)" I'm sure there is a lesson here for humanity but I'm not the one to figure it out.
Wait, so you guys said that the early earth had very low oxygen concentrations and because of that, Iron rusted green more commonly than red. If that's the case, why is Mars red? Wouldn't you need a lot of oxygen (like when life created it on Earth) to produce all of that red rust?
Remember that rust, typical red rust anyway, is iron _oxide._ There _was_ plenty of free oxygen on Mars. It has mostly escaped into space as Mars's atmosphere wasted away or was trapped in the rocks and dirt as iron oxide, i.e. rust. Thus a red, and now free oxygen deficient, Mars.
It's crazy to think that there are so many planets out there that we could have found already but it's just in one of these stages from a pic it would look lifeless
Thank you, but all the wiki says is that volcanic activity would replenish some of the CO2. But it doesn't state that it was enough to end the age. It would imply, but doesnt state, that eventually enough of the oxygen producing bacteria died so that C02 from volcanic activity could catch up with the bacteria and even things out. Either way, probably should have been a part of the video.
Considering all the extra tension these layers of ice would cause on the crust, volcanic activity would probably increase.... Redistribute the weight of the entire planet....
The snow/ice became dirty with volcanic ashes over time, thus absorbing more sun energy. Some volcano where ejecting CO2, helping creating a welcome heat blanket
We don't know! That's why it wasn't in the video, the thawing of snowball earth is a bit of a mystery. I find "volcanic activity" to be the geologists go-to as to why something happened, i think it's their way of thinking of something plausible to make the idiot asking hard questions to go away so they can figure out "important stuff"
M Mustafa one of the best ways to reduce CO2 is through carbon sequestration. Either through pumping it deep into the earth or through more natural methods. I like the idea of creating and restoring more wetlands. They do an incredible job of trapping CO2. Sadly we've converted a lot of them into crop land since that soil is also nutrient dense.
SuperDipMonster I think I read that chopping them down and then treating them and using them in buildings might help, under the grounds that dead trees biodegrade in a fashion that release green house gasses. Of course you probably want to put more trees where you chopped down trees, and I'm not sure how much you can do this sort of thing before the soil nutrition becomes a concern.
this is the type of stuff that just shows how difficult it must be for complex life to get started. people always worry about great filters when talking about the fermi paradox and wondering if the filters are behind or ahead of us, there seem to be a lot we got through with pure luck. honestly any filters ahead of us are ones we are putting there ourselves.
I don’t think I’m being parabolic here but this might be the best channel on RUclips. Hearing about the time it rained for 2 million years, because volcanoes erupted for 4 million years previously really puts everything in perspective.
0:29 - wait what, how could there be so much less dry land than now? The planet didn't lose water, did it? Or was the land much smoother, so a thinner layer of water could cover most of it?
I didn't understand that either. The best I can find is that there is some debate amongst geologists about how and when the continents appeared. The Oxygen catastrophe occurred at the end of the Archean Eon, which was the first eon after the Earth's solid crust formed. Some geologists hold that the continental crust floated to the Earth's surface during the Hadean Eon, while the Earth was still entirely molten. However, other geologists maintain that the continents were nucleated over oceanic hotspots only after the end of the Hadean. Either way the continental crust, being denser than water, could only emerge above the surface of the sea once it was thick enough to float high out of the denser mantle. This process would have to take some time, so might have been still on-going throughout the Archean. Unfortunately (but perhaps not coincidentally) no known rocks are now to have survived from the Hadean to now, so a clearer answer is some way away.
Hmm...I don't know any more about the planet's geology than what I've picked up from channels like this. The way I see it, if the amount of water on Earth only ever increased (from meteorite impacts?), and if as you say the crust was solid at this point, and if gravity pulls water towards the center of the planet everywhere so it mostly ends up in the "lowest" areas, then geometrically the planet would have to be smoother to have a larger % of the surface covered by water than now. Am I missing something in that regard?
Water is made of the lightest element, hydrogen. We receive extraterrestrial water every year. If hydrogen would not oxydize, it would leave the planet as helium do. Life need so many elements, including the dangerously reactive phosphorus for DNA... Life took so long to reach our level because a delicate balance slowly established
Something happened to mars to make it the way it is. Mars wasn't always a dusty rock, something caused it to become the way it is. Possibly something to do with why there is an asteroid belt just beyond it. But if you've seen picture of mars there is very severe damage to the planets surface, and it isn't natural.
Small correction here: "That Time Oxygen Almost Killed Everything" means that everything was nearly killed but nothing actually died. The title should be, "That time oxygen killed almost everything." Meaning almost everything died.
1 2 3 4 were being killed off by 5 1 2 and 3 were killed, but 4 survived 5's wrath. 5 almost killed everything. The statement of "almost killing everyone" remains true even though there were deaths. Also, language and grammar is effective as long as the listener or reader understands what is being said; and I assure you that the majority of those that clicked understood what PBS eon meant.
The Carbonation Event is happening at a much faster rate than would be expected without the burning of fossil fuels. I wonder if there will be a way to survive and study the effects
May I request video about Ediacaran biota? They have much less coverage, are they are really boring-soft-bodied creatures, or is there something interesting about them?
Sometimes history has better stories further back than our battles and our stories, and school doesn’t tell us about history correctly anymore, schools be outdated in history, they could do with an update.
Poop jokes aside, considering the chances of life starting at all, and the barley surviving that shows why finding life in the universe is so valuable.
hmmm, not sure anyone sees the irony here; climate change being caused by living entities, earth learning to adapt to it, life learning to adapt after suffering consequences, a new world evolves for better or worse in response to it, new life thrives and flourishes from it -- story sound familiar...
Yag but you also caught the part about almost everything dieing right? Yes the Earth would survive but should we really go ahead and kill 99% of all life including humans... I don't see that as a good thing.
Morgan Alabaster If you're worried about humans "killing" the planet, dont be. They'll only kill themselves and some other species, but life will continue as it always had.
Things like this make the existence of complex life seem that much rarer. I get that the "goldilocks zone" is one of the easiest factors for us to look at in extrastellar planets, but clearly there are so many other factors at play that we can't see from here. Even in our case, our existence is surprising when you look at Earth's history, despite our planet's proximity to its sun. I think we grossly overestimate the likelihood of life on other planets.
I suppose it depends on your definition of complex. One thing about the known universe however is just how absolutely huge it is. Our own galaxy is speculated to contain anywhere between 100-400 billion stars. Given that it is believed a similar if not even larger number of planets exist there, and that at least 200 billion galaxies are believed to exist, the shear number of places (planets, moons, asteroids) that might exist in many "goldilocks" sweet spots you mention could be much greater than you are giving credit. That is not to say they are actually close enough for us to find out about it or manages to survive for any length of time, but i believe its possibility is pretty high. If we manage to find life elsewhere in the solar system that gives it an even bigger push. If life can separately develop independently in at least two places in one star system then the odds go up even more.
You can just as easily see it from the other side. We've had a reducing atmosphere and an oxidizing atmosphere, periodic bombardments from asteroids, widespread tropical heat and widespread freezing, and life has always stubbornly reached out its pseudopod for the next day, narrowing its eyespots and asking, "Is that all ya got?"
Valen123456 You're totally right. Even if life is extremely rare, there's still a good chance it can be found elsewhere, given enough planets. And this sort of numbers game is one where the universe certainly has a strong advantage. However, I'm mostly referring to how people make a big deal about the next "Earth-like" planet that's gotten the media's attention. Often times these planets aren't that Earth-like at all, given their size, or the type of host star they have. Even when we do look at all of the details we can observe from here, it's never nearly enough for us to flag it as "can support life". We can make a pretty good guess about whether a planet can host liquid water, but even that is not reliable, because even Earth has been totally encased in ice in the past. Our own Earth-like planet can be extremely inhospitable, depending on when you look at it. Of course, that's not to say that studying these distant planets and solar systems isn't valuable. I only mean to say that more of us should acknowledge how incredibly unlikely it is that any of the thousands of "Earth-like" planets we've already found actually support life; especially complex life like plants and animals. In any case, I appreciate your counter-point, because everything you said is correct, and helps put my own comment in perspective.
Emma May I had considered that, but the problem with that idea is that we're just one example out of billions. Sure, we could look at our own example and conclude that life is persistent. However, the probability of us observing our own example as a failed attempt at intelligent life is 0. Obviously life survived in our example. If it hadn't then we wouldn't be around to observe it. Suppose the likelihood of life surviving is extremely small. Given the vastness of the universe, there's still a good chance it will happen at least once. My argument is that we are that one case out of billions where it actually works. I find it easier to believe that "Earth-like" planets are too inhospitable for life than to believe that life is so persistent that it can survive whatever nature throws at it. Nonetheless, you present an interesting counter-point, and I reserve the right to be wrong.
We have the added complexity of having a sample size of 1. We have visited 1 planet and it has life. Any idiot who has ever added two numbers together can tell you that is not valid. I agree the numbers are so large that need to give any single factor a small significance. But still we have no way of determining the chance of a perfect duplicate of Earth developing life. That is why we need to go to Mars.
was the sky really blue in the phase with nearly no oxygen in the atmosphere? also - why was this just 5 mins long :( i like your content, give me moar
MasterAlke the atmosphere was mostly made up of nitrogen then as it is now. Both nitrogen and oxygen scatter blue light more than they do other colors in the visible spectrum. So that probably makes sense.
Yeah, yeah, life is much more beautiful and all that but let's admit it, a planet covered in blood-red oceans is metal as hell
When she said the oceans went blood red I heard Nathan Explosion at the back of my head saying "Brutal."
Technically, rust as hell =p
Reminds me too much of DOOM.
I KNOW WHO YOU AAAAAARRRRE!
-William Murderface, Blood Ocean
Literally
The title sounds like a story the elements would tell at thanksgiving
“Hey, Oxygen.”
*”What now, carbon?”*
“Hehehe...”
*”What?!”*
“Remember that time you almost killed everything?”
*”Shut up.”*
Actually it is still killing us. Not as fast and not as obviously, but it does.
dpatrickst170
Yep, oxygen produced free radicals, which can damahe DNA, and cause cancer
@@yeehaw289 Are you sure about that?
@@fahmieyzs engrish
It should end with carbon saying "well now is my turn of almos killing everything hehe"
I bet all the other planets are like OMG Earth keeps dying her water..first green then red now blue like what is going on?!?
Like hair
Midnight Gear
What a great intelligent observation that none of 123 other people made
Seems like earth was a punk in it's youth. xD
Edgy
iTs NoT a PhAsE mIlKy wAy
What a time to be alive.
Literally.
i would have loved to be one of those bacteria, or maybe i was, who knows
Luis Sierra You wouldn’t even be able to see the world lol
Luis Sierra you wouldn’t even be conscious lol.
@@LuisSierra42 maybe you were your essence to be exact
When she said “they were basically being suffocated by their own waste” I laughed, because that’s basically what humans are doing
Not really, we still have plenty of oxygen, and that's in no danger. And there's no reason we can't survive global warming either. These doom and gloom people say global warming will kill everything forget how life flourished back on Earth when CO2 levels were above 400ppm. But things will get nastier with more disease, more storms and higher mortality rate all around.
@@JimmyMon666 Hence being "suffocated by our own waste"... Even if some of us make it through the other end alive, humanity as we know it will still perish 🤷
Patterns, patterns. We evolved to seek them for a reason. Why? Because observing them works pretty well 😅 We're going to kill off a huge amount of species and probably most (if not all) of our population, then everything will adjust and bounce back.
And RUclips comments
I like how Millions of people talk like there not even Humans
One of my fantasies would be to have a time machine (with a decent life support system) to visit Earth at any stage in its history. Earth was a rocky and volcanic hellhole, a hot green water world, a hot red water world and a giant snowball. These sound like cool sci-fi locations for an epic space opera and it delights my inner geek.
Animals of the Cambrian era are more alien than anything I've ever seen in big sci fi movies. Opabinia is my favorite.
That would be most of people's dreams, including me. yet you need to travel faster than light do to it. but it doesn't means that is impossible. they have proved time travel is "mathematically possible", not because we don't create time machines means that is impossible. but really hard.
Faster then light travel making you go back in time is a fictional idea. From the observer's point of view if an object traveled faster then light towards them it would seem like the object is going back in time. They will see the object arrive 1st and then "travel" backwards as earlier and earlier light hits the viewer. These is disregarding all the weird things that will happen with ftl travel but going back in time is not one of the things even though to an observer it looks like the object split into two, one object that traveled towards them and one object that is traveling away from them and going "back" in time.
However, if you could go faster then light, you can still travel away from Earth to see what it looked like in the past. So do not be too disappointed.
FTL must allow time travel to be actual FTL. Please ask physicists to explain it to you.
If FTL travel does anything to time you won't travel backwards in time, rather you will travel forward in imaginary time.
THE SUN IS A DEADLY LAZER
not anymore, there's a blanket!
DontMockMySmock *laser
*Lazer
Nicholas Bohmer he was referring to a viral video called, "History of the world, I guess."
DontMockMySmock hey, we could make a religion outta this!
Exactly what I thought when ozone layer was mentioned. Praise the Wurtz!
Weather update:
Meteors are falling from the sky.
Weather update:
The floor is no longer lava.
Weather update:
... It's raining...
Flooding alert:
the entire world is now a ocean
Volcano alert:
thats land
The sun is a deadly lazer
@@cameronallen5995
Not anymore there's a blanket
oh look a place to live! no they dont have legs
*Quotes intensifies*
Earth: takes a billion years to form an ozone layer
Humans: puts a hole through it in less then a thousand
Earth already has a hole in the ozone layer its called the northern and southern lights.
Darryl Weathers that doesn’t mean that human didn’t also put a hole through it in less than a thousand.
@@ryrysofly09 wasnt any humans on mars or venus either. Didnt stop them from turning into a barren wasteland and a hellhole.
Darryl Weathers that doesn’t mean that humans didn’t put a hole in the ozone layer in less than 1000 years.
@@darrylweathers7361 The northern and southern lights are not holes. They are disturbances from solar radiation. It doesn't penetrate or cause holes in the ozone, it just distortion patterns that diminish after the event passes.
Interesting phrasing at 1:41, "when these little microbes started farting out oxygen..."
One Drop
You don’t like What? Your farts clearly smell of methane and of disturbing amounts of rotten flesh.
I had to rewind and replay in order to make sure I didn't misheard her. Yes, she said that.
I about spat my drink out hearing her say that
for a second there i felt like a kid listening in wonder at the story of our world
Ancient Laws me too.
Ancient Laws
Ancient Laws SCIENCE!
Ancient Laws Taaaste the suuuun
For a second there, you were. ;)
🎶 NOW YOU CAN EAT SUNLIGHT 🎶 using a revolutionary technique you can convert sunlight into food 🎶 TASTE THE SUNNNN ☀️
History of the world I guess right???
THE *SUN* IS *A* DEADLY *LAZERRRRR*
U can make religion out off this
acapellascience You can also taste rainbows. *COUGH* Skittles *COUGH* “Taste The Rainbow.”
I wonder if I can eat *BLAAAAADES of GRAAAAASSSSS*
Why did you skip the idea that the reason life on Earth survived the Oxygen Catastrophe is because aerobic bacteria evolved before the cyanobacteria could've gone extinct. Aerobic Bacteria are able to use oxygen + eating sugars from cyanobacteria for respiration, as opposed to making sugars with carbon dioxide + sunlight to then use. The existence of both in tandem is what causes our current atmosphere to balance somewhere other than completely CO2 or completely O2.
Because science.
They sure took their sweet time though. ;)
· 0xFFF1 Well Cyano Bacteria existed for only 300 million years when this was happening which possibly meant that they had a lot of work to do in using it up
you dont know how to cater to your audience. that is why you are confused.
+. 0xFFF1 : thanks for the comment. It occurred to me at the end of the video that it wasn't thoroughly explained why the oxygen didn't just continue to get greater to the point of complete mass extinction.
green oceans indicate low oxigen, oh the irony
sorry, had to make it
Nice one
Stupid people won't get it. Thus, so few comments.
It's nice being rare...
Lol. That's hilarious!
@@fobbitoperator3620 Stupid people? You're definitely not one of those people, though. Right? I'm sure there's a lot that you don't know. In reality, everyone is stupid. Just depends on the subject. Shakespeare once said, " The fool doth think he is wise, but the wise man knows himself to be a fool". Chew on that for a minute, smart guy.
ha
It was a lil bit funny
10'000'000 years later: "That time plastic almost killed everything"
Ha we won’t be around by then
@@El1society it's amazing to think how rare intelligent life is yet how delicate it is. we need a way out of this planet before we go extinct.
Plastics? No. Other human pollution? Also no, but they will likely cause an anthropecene extinction event.
Always remember folks, humans aren't the first organisms whose rise resulted in a mass extinction. It's happened before, and it's happening again.
But also know this:
Though many things we know and love may soon come to an end, when nature finds its new equilibrium, if things go well, life may evolve to be more diverse and beautiful than ever before.
Seamus Callaghan and know this. Barring nuclear extermination, it won't happen in our lifetimes
The recovery part - sadly not. At least, not under any normal definition of lifetime. I wouldn't rule out the emergence of technologies that could indefinitely extend lifespans, store people in a dormant state for the long term, or both. The mass extinction is already very much underway though, and has been for a while. We will see that part ramp up noticeably within our lifetimes.
Seamus Callaghan not even 1 percent of species in last 150 years does not constitute a mass extinction. A good portion of those extinctions have happened without any human intervention.
Mass extinctions rarely happen in as few as 150 years. Most have taken thousands, as far as we can tell. Current extinction rates are 1000 to 10,000 times higher than normal background rates - the highest they've been since the K-T extinction. That
Unfortunately because of their semi-permeable skin the amphibians are on the front line...our toxins transfer directly through their skin and cause horrific genetic mutations.
You know what would be an interesting episode? Could you guys please go through the rock layers in a place with well-known strata and explain the geological periods that created them? Many people have heard that "this era happened so many years ago", but not as much "the remnants of this era can be seen so many meters down from the surface".
You're saying that like if a crash course for geologic record was a bad idea.
It might be a good idea - that way people might know what words like "Ordovician", "Hadean" and "Eocene" mean without having to enroll in a Historical Geology course at their local University.
This would be wonderful!
Yes please
yesssss pls
Fascinating story, excellent presentation.
The Warped Board +
+
+
+
nomoreusernames +!!!
The more i know about earth, the more i realize how rare it will be to find life on another planet.
Yeah you only have several trillion trillion chances of life being out there somewhere else
The more and more I study life and how incredibly tough it is, AND the fact that life *terraformed* this planet and enabled life as we know it. The more I realize how easy it would be to start elsewhere in the universe, and in no small degree
Sometimes it makes u wonder, where did its all started ? Does unbiological thing enable life or did life actually is not only the concept that we know. Does inanimate things actually has life, omg my brain :((
@@slinkerdeer think you should study more then. The chances of the existence of life at some point in time in another planet is veeeery slim and the chances of it actualy surviving is almost to none.
Septian Rico Hernawan life is organic, rocks don’t life, inanimate things life coral and sea shells do.
Intelligent being from the future:”that time humans almost killed everything”
almost?
@@pphyjynx8217 trust me, we won't kill everything. Maybe ourselves, and life will continue on after us.
@@JimmyMon666 never underestimate humanity's stupidity.
@@Kalorag never underestimate stupidity's humanity
@@caykroyd10 never humanize stupidity's underestimation
I love how in the last few decades the story of "snowball earth" has grown from a little fringe theory and I've got to watch more and more details cone together.
"That Time Oxygen Almost Killed Everything"
I would rearrange this to -
"That Time Oxygen killed almost everything"
Cause it didn't just "almost kill", oxygen killed a lot and almost everything.
I understand it in a way that life itself came close to its end, so the original word order is more fitting.
THIS
Climate change deniers: "little humans couldn't possibly be having such a drastic effect on the planet"
Microscopic bacteria: *"I'm about to ruin this man's whole career"*
"Climate change deniers", Snotty words from so called intelligent people determined to prove they are right at any cost. But hey, get rid of your computer, phone, car and anything else and I will join you in misery in a cave you twat.
@Dixie Ten Broeck we may never no ;)
Lol, I turned into my long past 10 y/o self when she said, "...farted out oxygen."!
I love how this channel saves the "big words" for naming names and the rest of the time uses a language all ages can understand and relate too. :)
"Things just got to get worse, beofre they get better."
And that has become my new motto
To think, your average houseplant could have wiped out millions of lifeforms......
always knew that bean plant I had on my kitchen cabinet as a kid wanted to kill me!
Dang I never knew my elephant ear plant is so dangerous
Da Dragon Durp I SEE YOU EVERY WHERE
So maybe M Night Shyamalan was on to something with "The happening"? :)
Well after all that testing it better wipe out milions!
I've enjoyed every episode so far. I would really like you to discuss the evolution of grasses. I remember my introduction to agriculture professor pointing out that they haven't been around all that long. I always try to imagine a world without grass and what that would really look like.
Also, as a geologist, thank you for talking about BIFs. They're the coolest.
A brief answer to "what would that look like": lots and lots of ferns and other small leafy ground cover.
If the ocean was green, and what color was the sky? 1:08
I think the atmosphere was still made of mostly nitrogen like today, it was probably already blue (cyan, to be precise).
MakoRuu
I hope you're trolling
MakoRuu
Either that or you responded to a comment that someone deleted
Luis Navas I
Luis Navas yellow or same as green
Her: imagine dying crushed by your own waste
Humanity: heh... imagine that...
After watching this, i got a goosbump and it feels like Earth is a living organism.
J Kross p
This channel is just so fascinating. I love that I have the opportunity to watch an Eons video at any point of the day, and that I can learn so many things I don’t get a chance to while at school. Thanks so much for teaching me new things every day!
I like how she says the time line like 2 millon years is nothing.
In comparison with the whole existence of universe or even earth it is really nothing.
Miss Houston she said billion
Earth is like what 4.5Billion years old? so ye 2million is basically nothing.
It kinda is. In terms of how old the Earth is.
To think we have any kind of a grip on how long any of this has been around is nuts.
This episode took my BREATH away!
Ok I'll take my leave.
This is what makes me believe that life on different planets don't have to have the same chemistry as Earth for there to be life. Earth wasn't always covered in Carbon Dioxide and Oxygen.
Marissa Ojeda
I do think that complex life would probably require a similarly powerful energy source to O2, however. Aerobic respiration produces several times more energy than anaerobic processes, so without it, life would have to run on much thriftier energy strategies, possibly forbidding the development of multicellular life
3:41 "They needed CO2 to survive. So they were basically being suffocated by their own waste (oxygen)" I'm sure there is a lesson here for humanity but I'm not the one to figure it out.
*Oceans turn blood red*
Me: Dammit Moses!
Can you make a video about the time there were giant insects, and how would an average mammal would fare in that environment?
It would be an interesting thought experiment, though mammals hadn't evolved yet.
German Jimenez THERE WERE GIANT INSECTS ?! I really want to believe you but I'm afraid to Google it because I surely I'd be disappointed.
April.6_6 Dragonflies the size of eagles, and just as predatory. Millipedes 10 feet in length. Those were the arthropods of the Carboniferous.
Wow. That is SO COOL. What did the Carboniferous dragonflies eat? Amphibians?
Some, probably, as well as primitive reptiles and other insects.
oxygen is really dangerous yet there are people that inhale it daily. don't do drugs, kids
Seriously?!!
One of the finest channels on RUclips. Sincere kudos.
Did earth's hydrosphere, atmosphere, and geosphere coevolve with earth's biosphere?
Yup!
So glad you covered this! This is one of my favorite stories from Earth's history and who doesn't like Iron Banded Formations?
Wait, so you guys said that the early earth had very low oxygen concentrations and because of that, Iron rusted green more commonly than red. If that's the case, why is Mars red? Wouldn't you need a lot of oxygen (like when life created it on Earth) to produce all of that red rust?
Remember that rust, typical red rust anyway, is iron _oxide._ There _was_ plenty of free oxygen on Mars. It has mostly escaped into space as Mars's atmosphere wasted away or was trapped in the rocks and dirt as iron oxide, i.e. rust. Thus a red, and now free oxygen deficient, Mars.
shut up, *placoderm*
"Too much of a good thing can ruin everything for everybody."
Maybe I'm just too good for the world.
I can’t even tell you how much I love this channel :)
It's crazy to think that there are so many planets out there that we could have found already but it's just in one of these stages from a pic it would look lifeless
Luke - Or consider that life might have formed....and been snuffed out. And we'll never know.
what caused the glaciation to end? The forming of the ozone layer?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huronian_glaciation
Thank you, but all the wiki says is that volcanic activity would replenish some of the CO2. But it doesn't state that it was enough to end the age. It would imply, but doesnt state, that eventually enough of the oxygen producing bacteria died so that C02 from volcanic activity could catch up with the bacteria and even things out.
Either way, probably should have been a part of the video.
Considering all the extra tension these layers of ice would cause on the crust, volcanic activity would probably increase....
Redistribute the weight of the entire planet....
The snow/ice became dirty with volcanic ashes over time, thus absorbing more sun energy. Some volcano where ejecting CO2, helping creating a welcome heat blanket
We don't know! That's why it wasn't in the video, the thawing of snowball earth is a bit of a mystery. I find "volcanic activity" to be the geologists go-to as to why something happened, i think it's their way of thinking of something plausible to make the idiot asking hard questions to go away so they can figure out "important stuff"
Suffocated by thier own waste🤔 Sounds familiar.. Like humans
funny i laugh
Microscopic plankton friggin terraformed the earth??
Yep
Rafael Lopez ya is it hard trying to be edgy all the time?
Ayla Williamson This tbh
Wasn't technically Plankton though.
Ayla Williamson rekt
"That Time Oxygen Almost Killed Everything
"
Arthropods: you are wrong I am getting stronger
300 MILLIoN YEARS! why am I just now hearing about this?
Can we use the same Cyanobacteria to reduce CO2?
I don't think that would be terribly different than using some other photosynthetic organisms like algae or plants to reduce CO2.
M Mustafa one of the best ways to reduce CO2 is through carbon sequestration. Either through pumping it deep into the earth or through more natural methods. I like the idea of creating and restoring more wetlands. They do an incredible job of trapping CO2. Sadly we've converted a lot of them into crop land since that soil is also nutrient dense.
Thanks Dave.
We could plant trees and stop chopping down all the ones that are there.
SuperDipMonster I think I read that chopping them down and then treating them and using them in buildings might help, under the grounds that dead trees biodegrade in a fashion that release green house gasses. Of course you probably want to put more trees where you chopped down trees, and I'm not sure how much you can do this sort of thing before the soil nutrition becomes a concern.
No doubt. One of the best channels
Brilliantly done. I really like how you bring all this awesome information with such an enthousiasm that it's contagious.
Okay I love PBS Eons! How had I not heard of it earlier?
"Life became more complex and suddenly... here we are!" What a summary!
Earth: Covered-in an never ending blood-red ocean.
Nathan Explosion: Brütal.
Sometimes, things gotta get worse before they get better- best quote I've heard so far!!
I always thought it was crazy how one of the most chemically reactive elements filled our atmosphere, if we had life XD
this is the type of stuff that just shows how difficult it must be for complex life to get started. people always worry about great filters when talking about the fermi paradox and wondering if the filters are behind or ahead of us, there seem to be a lot we got through with pure luck. honestly any filters ahead of us are ones we are putting there ourselves.
Great work!You've earned a subscriber!
She explains everything lightly and by the simplest of words. Love it!
PBS eon 4080: Time when humans killed almost everything
I love that there seems to be no end to things that will blow my mind.
Tfw you were murdering everybody alive but then became everyone's best friend and literally the pillar of aerobic life itself.
I don’t think I’m being parabolic here but this might be the best channel on RUclips.
Hearing about the time it rained for 2 million years, because volcanoes erupted for 4 million years previously really puts everything in perspective.
0:29 - wait what, how could there be so much less dry land than now? The planet didn't lose water, did it? Or was the land much smoother, so a thinner layer of water could cover most of it?
I didn't understand that either. The best I can find is that there is some debate amongst geologists about how and when the continents appeared. The Oxygen catastrophe occurred at the end of the Archean Eon, which was the first eon after the Earth's solid crust formed. Some geologists hold that the continental crust floated to the Earth's surface during the Hadean Eon, while the Earth was still entirely molten. However, other geologists maintain that the continents were nucleated over oceanic hotspots only after the end of the Hadean.
Either way the continental crust, being denser than water, could only emerge above the surface of the sea once it was thick enough to float high out of the denser mantle. This process would have to take some time, so might have been still on-going throughout the Archean. Unfortunately (but perhaps not coincidentally) no known rocks are now to have survived from the Hadean to now, so a clearer answer is some way away.
Hmm...I don't know any more about the planet's geology than what I've picked up from channels like this. The way I see it, if the amount of water on Earth only ever increased (from meteorite impacts?), and if as you say the crust was solid at this point, and if gravity pulls water towards the center of the planet everywhere so it mostly ends up in the "lowest" areas, then geometrically the planet would have to be smoother to have a larger % of the surface covered by water than now. Am I missing something in that regard?
Unless...maybe some water getting mixed into the layers under the crust during subduction, so that the surface actually loses water over time?
Water is made of the lightest element, hydrogen. We receive extraterrestrial water every year. If hydrogen would not oxydize, it would leave the planet as helium do. Life need so many elements, including the dangerously reactive phosphorus for DNA... Life took so long to reach our level because a delicate balance slowly established
We would have a lot less dry land if all the glaciers melt. Right now, a lot of that water is at our poles in the form of ice.
I love banded iron formations! And this channel.
I’d like to think mars died from oxygenation. After all it has a CO2 atmosphere but a red rust surface? Where’d the oxygen come from ;)
From the comet water that broken into hydrogen and oxygen while solar wind blew off the hydrogen component.
And Venus became hell because of to much Co2 anyway it goes the balance is so fragile
Something happened to mars to make it the way it is. Mars wasn't always a dusty rock, something caused it to become the way it is. Possibly something to do with why there is an asteroid belt just beyond it. But if you've seen picture of mars there is very severe damage to the planets surface, and it isn't natural.
Matt Evans in what way do you me “isn’t natural”?
Mars is cooler than earth. The reason why We managing because the sun.
That dramatic music at the end tho...
I LOVE IT!
I like that ending message. Sometimes things get worse before they get better, with awsome hopeful music in the background.
I am in love with this channel.
Could you do an episode about gorgonopsids?
Juan Martín, yes.
so basically, Earth used to be Kamino from Star Wars
"They were basically being suffocated by their own water" still holds true
Small correction here: "That Time Oxygen Almost Killed Everything" means that everything was nearly killed but nothing actually died. The title should be, "That time oxygen killed almost everything." Meaning almost everything died.
1 2 3 4 were being killed off by 5
1 2 and 3 were killed, but 4 survived 5's wrath. 5 almost killed everything.
The statement of "almost killing everyone" remains true even though there were deaths.
Also, language and grammar is effective as long as the listener or reader understands what is being said; and I assure you that the majority of those that clicked understood what PBS eon meant.
So nobody gonna talk about those bacteria who literally farted the ozone into existence
Woah, it's almost like what is happening these days; but instead of oxygen, it's carbon dioxide :o
Jonathan David hmm good point. Total opposite I wonder what effects would happen
The Carbonation Event is happening at a much faster rate than would be expected without the burning of fossil fuels. I wonder if there will be a way to survive and study the effects
Only we don't have +/- 300 000 000 years to wait until the climate finally gets back to what it was (is) when humans thrived.
A billion years from now, plant people will make a video titled "That Time Carbon Dioxide Almost Killed Everything".
cycle of life :D
May I request video about Ediacaran biota? They have much less coverage, are they are really boring-soft-bodied creatures, or is there something interesting about them?
The closing line is perfect for 2020: "Sometimes things gotta get worse before they get better"
If only we could somehow recreate this CO2-eating oxygen-producing bacteria... there is plenty of food for them now...
Sometimes history has better stories further back than our battles and our stories, and school doesn’t tell us about history correctly anymore, schools be outdated in history, they could do with an update.
0:18 - "His palms are sweaty, knees weak, arms are heavy. There's vomit on his sweater already, mom's spaghetti,"
He's nervous but on the surface he looks calm and ready
Hence clear that nature does not created life but life created nature
I like how she doesn't skip a beat when she casually mentions bacteria farting out oxygen.
The background music in this episode could not be more perfect for the story. Kudos!
Thank you microbes for giving us oxygen, and ultimately allowing for the existence of doggos!
Poop jokes aside, considering the chances of life starting at all, and the barley surviving that shows why finding life in the universe is so valuable.
hmmm, not sure anyone sees the irony here; climate change being caused by living entities, earth learning to adapt to it, life learning to adapt after suffering consequences, a new world evolves for better or worse in response to it, new life thrives and flourishes from it -- story sound familiar...
Yag but you also caught the part about almost everything dieing right? Yes the Earth would survive but should we really go ahead and kill 99% of all life including humans... I don't see that as a good thing.
The difference here is that the change is coming on at a hugely larger rate than ever before, much higher than evolution can adapt to.
Morgan Alabaster
If you're worried about humans "killing" the planet, dont be.
They'll only kill themselves and some other species, but life will continue as it always had.
Man, I do love this channel
Excellent Representation including host, animation and script (also remarcable nice-soothing background music)
If oxygen was that low,does that mean that fire was rare at the time?
With most of the earth under water, you would think so.
Things like this make the existence of complex life seem that much rarer.
I get that the "goldilocks zone" is one of the easiest factors for us to look at in extrastellar planets, but clearly there are so many other factors at play that we can't see from here. Even in our case, our existence is surprising when you look at Earth's history, despite our planet's proximity to its sun. I think we grossly overestimate the likelihood of life on other planets.
I suppose it depends on your definition of complex.
One thing about the known universe however is just how absolutely huge it is. Our own galaxy is speculated to contain anywhere between 100-400 billion stars. Given that it is believed a similar if not even larger number of planets exist there, and that at least 200 billion galaxies are believed to exist, the shear number of places (planets, moons, asteroids) that might exist in many "goldilocks" sweet spots you mention could be much greater than you are giving credit.
That is not to say they are actually close enough for us to find out about it or manages to survive for any length of time, but i believe its possibility is pretty high. If we manage to find life elsewhere in the solar system that gives it an even bigger push. If life can separately develop independently in at least two places in one star system then the odds go up even more.
You can just as easily see it from the other side. We've had a reducing atmosphere and an oxidizing atmosphere, periodic bombardments from asteroids, widespread tropical heat and widespread freezing, and life has always stubbornly reached out its pseudopod for the next day, narrowing its eyespots and asking, "Is that all ya got?"
Valen123456
You're totally right.
Even if life is extremely rare, there's still a good chance it can be found elsewhere, given enough planets. And this sort of numbers game is one where the universe certainly has a strong advantage.
However, I'm mostly referring to how people make a big deal about the next "Earth-like" planet that's gotten the media's attention. Often times these planets aren't that Earth-like at all, given their size, or the type of host star they have. Even when we do look at all of the details we can observe from here, it's never nearly enough for us to flag it as "can support life". We can make a pretty good guess about whether a planet can host liquid water, but even that is not reliable, because even Earth has been totally encased in ice in the past. Our own Earth-like planet can be extremely inhospitable, depending on when you look at it.
Of course, that's not to say that studying these distant planets and solar systems isn't valuable. I only mean to say that more of us should acknowledge how incredibly unlikely it is that any of the thousands of "Earth-like" planets we've already found actually support life; especially complex life like plants and animals.
In any case, I appreciate your counter-point, because everything you said is correct, and helps put my own comment in perspective.
Emma May
I had considered that, but the problem with that idea is that we're just one example out of billions. Sure, we could look at our own example and conclude that life is persistent. However, the probability of us observing our own example as a failed attempt at intelligent life is 0. Obviously life survived in our example. If it hadn't then we wouldn't be around to observe it.
Suppose the likelihood of life surviving is extremely small. Given the vastness of the universe, there's still a good chance it will happen at least once. My argument is that we are that one case out of billions where it actually works.
I find it easier to believe that "Earth-like" planets are too inhospitable for life than to believe that life is so persistent that it can survive whatever nature throws at it.
Nonetheless, you present an interesting counter-point, and I reserve the right to be wrong.
We have the added complexity of having a sample size of 1. We have visited 1 planet and it has life. Any idiot who has ever added two numbers together can tell you that is not valid. I agree the numbers are so large that need to give any single factor a small significance. But still we have no way of determining the chance of a perfect duplicate of Earth developing life. That is why we need to go to Mars.
Oxygen stole my wife once.
Damn Oxygen.
Just utilized this video for help with my college biology lab. Thanks PBS!
this channel is so awesome
was the sky really blue in the phase with nearly no oxygen in the atmosphere? also - why was this just 5 mins long :( i like your content, give me moar
MasterAlke the atmosphere was mostly made up of nitrogen then as it is now. Both nitrogen and oxygen scatter blue light more than they do other colors in the visible spectrum. So that probably makes sense.
This is amazing. Thank you for this. 😄
Thank you, tiny, farting friends!
Great episode! Added a lot more information to my understanding of that period in earth's past. Thanks!
Earth almost looked like Namek