These are the populations of the conurbations, not the cities. For example, the West Midlands area has a population of 2.7 million, of which around 1.1 million people live in the City of Birmingham. Greater Manchester has a population of 2.8 million, of which around 600,000 live in the City of Manchester. Just imagine how few people actually live in the City of London, as opposed to Greater London.
@@paultaylor7082 Yes. But the city council populations of Bristol, Edinburgh, Liverpool and Sheffield are all around half a million. Southampton a quarter of a million.
@@paultaylor7082 London is on a different scale mate, Greater London is not the entirety of the metropolitan area of London, let alone the extended unbroken urban area of London which extends into Essex, Herts, Kent, the Sussexes, Berkshire, Surrey. Vids like this are a little misleading, to refer to [for example] the Merseyside conurbation as Liverpool's metro area is a wee bit shabby and lazy, same with Brum and Manc-chester. The comparable area of the London conurbation has a population of 13-14 million people. For context I live about 40 miles north of Leicester Square, once you get south of Hatfield you're basically inside the edge of town.
@@StuArch1 Manchester is a farce all they did was swallow up all the surrounding towns and call it Greater Manchester which makes it look massive but they are still towns in there own right. manchester itself is tiny if you just look at the boundary of the "city" not including Salford
@@oooooo-ji2nn who are you replying to...what are you referring to?.....Birmingham IS bigger than manchester .....as a city AND as a conurbation. And Liverpool is definitely bigger than Southampton.....this video is obviously bollocks.
This is the metropolitan areas not the city. GREATER MANCHESTER IS BIGGER THAN THE WEST MIDLANDS IN AREA AND POPULATION. Two cities and eight metropolitan boroughs
They've probably included the combined populations of the City of Manchester and Greater Manchester..Birmingham is our 2nd city..and larger overall....these are inaccurate figures...for instance..in the case of Liverpool..was the population of the Wirral included in the count ..being part of Merseyside....and Gateshead for Newcastle Under Tyne ?
The population on here is for the birmingham built up area which includes wolverhampton,coventry and all the other surrounding towns ! The manchester built up area is slightly larger!
The truth is Manchester is part of a near uninterrupted urban arc stretching from Liverpool to Sheffield, whereas Birmingham is a tiny speck in a virtual desert beyond Solihull.
@@johnwilson3842 Sorry there are not 3 million people living in the City of Manchester, the official recorded population size of the City of Manchester is only 580,000 citizens.
@@peterwilliamallen1063 It's interesting really...there are no clear definitions used here...the London population figure is reflective of all of Greater London...it includes places like Romford, Croydon, Bromley and so forth. London's population is always measured in this way..whereas other large UK cities are not. Manchester's M postcode area which covers the continuous city area (ie the bits of the city which now sit in Bury, Salford, Rochdale and so forth but not those towns in themselves eg Prestwich, Manchester sits in Bury Metropolitan Council area) has a population of 1.2 million. The London postcode area (is areas which have N, NW, SE, SW, E, W, EC, EC postcodes) has a population of 5.4 million. To have parity with how London's population is calculated, the built up area's population should be used in each case. It's the fairest way of comparing...or we determine that London's population is much smaller than has been quoted for decades.....
@@davidowen2396 David Owen, Postcodes do not denote a Cities area or population, all a Post Code is a Postal district and is set up by the Post Office for Postal Sorting areas, London has been as such since the early part of the 20th century and this has nothing what so ever how big a City is or what position it is in, in the West Midlands there are Towns like Solihull and parts of Sandwell that have a Birmingham "B" Post Code and also areas such as Water Orton and Coleshill in Warwickshire have "B" Birmingham post Codes and as I have mentioned these are just for the Post office to sort their Mail out into Postal districts so no matter how people manipulate things the position of a City goes solely by the size of it's Population, the figure you state of 1.2 million is for the area known as Greater Manchester Metropolitan County and the population of the Metropolitan County of the West Midlands is 2.65 million, but this goes only on the population of a CITY defined by that Cities population and it's Cities boundary, as I have mentioned the Official population size of the City of Manchester is 560.000 citizens and the population of the City of Birmingham is over 1.5 million Citizens making Birmingham the second largest CITY in the UK officially. The Greater Manchester metro county is not a City but just a county so how can this be classed as the second largest city when it isn't a City, the City of Manchester is the City.
First time I've heard my home town, Brighton, has 617,000 inhabitants. From what I know, Brighton and Hove has a combined population of around 250,000 and the Greater Brighton conurbation that includes towns like Worthing and Littlehampton has a population of around 400,000. 617,000 is way off the mark.
No. Birmingham is the largest city. The CITY of London is tiny, only just over a square mile with a population of 8,616 (2021 census). What people call 'London' is really Greater London and has the status of a county.
@jahmah519 no that's what they want you to believe due to the prejudice Liverpool always gets they don't put out the real statistics. Geocities is the only one to tell the actual stats
From someone with a bit of geography knowledge here, when you look at what is classed as the true city size which is basically the city centre and then all its inner subburbs ie the urban sprawl and density areas that extend out then obviously london is first, Birmingham 2nd, leeds 3rd and Manchester 4th. Greater manchester is almost 2 times the size of leeds but calling places like bury and Stockport manchester you then might as well have bradford and wakefield as part of leeds which would then take leeds to nearly size of manchester!
Yeah, and Wakefield, Huddersfield, Castleford, Pontefract, Selby, Wetherby, Skipton, Harrogate, Top five by population of City Proper are London, Birmingham, Leeds, Glasgow and Sheffield. No idea when the entire population of West and North Yorkshire became Leeds, no idea when the entire population of Nottinghamshire became Nottingham, no idea when the entire population of Hampshire became Southampton, the entire population of North East England became Newcastle, the entire population of Merseyside became Liverpool, the entire population of Greater Manchester became Manchester but the entire population of South Yorkshire, North Derbyshire and North Nottinghamshire didn't become Sheffield, even though these areas are ACTUALLY SHEFFIELD with ACTUAL SHEFFIELD POSTCODES. But if we are measuring stupid figures like that then the entire population of people with an "S" Postcode for Sheffield is about 2 million, it stretches from WF (Wakefield in the North) to NG (Nottingham to the South) DE (Derby to the West and South West) and DN (Doncaster to the East)
Absolute bunkum. So many discrepancies. No way is Southampton a larger city than Liverpool or Bristol. And Bristol isn't and never has been in Gloucestershire, it's a county in its own right.
Population figures for Southampton include Portsmouth because it's metropolitan, that's why it's so high. Cities are listed as counties, not local areas.
@@britishstatistics Again, it should be listed as Southampton/Portsmouth then. Southampton and Portsmouth is not a conurbation, they are 20 miles apart and there is open countryside between the two cities. I used to live in Portsmouth and I know the people there would regard it as an insult to be labelled as part of Southampton.
Liverpool is massive! it's even bigger than Leeds and manchester but never gets the credit it deserves due to all the Prejudice and Discrimination it gets from the Media's lies. Fact
This list is entirely inaccurate and misleading, these population figures are for the entire sub division metropolitan areas and not the city's themselves, the Leeds population figure includes Bradford, kirklees and Wakefield
I used to deliver to people in Bradford and Wakefield the look on their faces when I asked them how come the postcode is Bd17 then it says Leeds underneath same as some Wf postcodes 👍
I'm from Leeds and have to say thr population quoted seems well over the top, but why it would include Bradford, which is a big city in its own right, is frankly beyond me
These are conurbation statistics. When they say Southampton they're including Portsmouth, Fareham, Eastleigh, Winchester etc, same with Newcastle they've included Gateshead and Sunderland and the rest of the area.
Tyne and Wear is made up of 5 boroughs (separate councils). ‘Tyneside’ being Gateshead, Newcastle, north/ south Tyneside, combined population of 830,000. Sunderland’s borough makes up the Tyne and Wear with a population of around 340,000. 🫨
These are all asked on catchment areas and counties & not on contiguous solid built up areas. Greater Manchester is based on a catchment area with differing accents & sometimes countryside & fields in between. Leeds is a collective of two cities and a collective of large and small towns according to this. Birmingham, Liverpool, Glasgow & Sheffield or Edinburgh are all sold short in this video all you have to do is some research & the real proof of the pudding is a visit to each conglomerate
This video is taking the populations of Metropolitan County Councils and making out that it is the population of a City, the official population size of the City of Birmingham is over 1.5 million citizens making it the second largest UK City and the official population size of the City of Manchester is only 580,000 making it the 8th largest City in the UK,
@@peterwilliamallen1063 Birmingham is a big city proper it took the mantle as the 2nd most populous city proper in 1961. From Glasgow which had at its peak of 1.127.000 in 1938 in its city proper. It has 635.000 in its city proper now but has a contiguous built up area of 1.3 to 1.8 million if you want to use other methods. Manchester is the centre of the 2nd most built up area in Western Europe after Rhine Ruhr in Germany. Newcastle upon Tyne has a city population of some 270.000 & a grater urban area of over 1 million. Etc etc
@@peterwilliamallen1063 I often bite my lip when I hear Mancunians stating that Manchester is on a par with London without even considering that it’s an urban county made up of differing towns even surrounded by countryside etc though I do understand due to this GMC wields much economic power as well as political and cultural influence but I don’t like how they brush off places especially Birmingham & Glasgow as smaller towns etc.
@@ScranMan-oi8qg If you google this subject you will find that Birmingham took second City status in 1918 not 1961 as you stated and that this subject is entitled "Top 15 Cities in the UK by Population 2022", but it is listing most cities not in the size of population of the City but the Metropolitan Council, Manchester is the one that always crops up by Mancunians, they get mixed up between Greater Manchester and the City of Manchester which even though the name Manchester is in both titles they are two independent things, Greater Manchester is one of the Metropolitan Councils set up in 1971 like the West Midlands and Merseyside Metro Council to look after transport. Police, Fire, Ambulance and roads in the council area set up by the UK Government and is not a CITY as this video seems to make people believe and the City of Manchester which is the City and the City of Manchester's population is only 580,000 citizens and the City area is approximately 50 sq miles, where as the Population of the City f Birmingham is over 1.5 million citizens living in the City of Birmingham and it's area is approximately 150 sq miles plus the City Council of Birmingham has a Lord Mayor and is the largest urban City Council in Europe, not only that the population of the City of Glasgow is only 608,000 not what you stated again that is the population of Greater Glasgow and this makes Glasgow bigger than Manchester. All this can be found if you google it. These City sizes have nothing to do with urban area sizes just the population of a City with in it's boundaries.
@@ScranMan-oi8qg This has always been the case as far as I can remember, when I was a young teenager in the 1970's Manchester was always saying it was the second City of the UK and even now stating silly reason's such as Manchester United being so well known, but the UK Government has always stated Birmingham as being the second City due to it's population size, at the moment it stands in the City boundary at about 1.5 million citizens but that will start growing as more high rise apartments are being built in Birmingham City Center and since Birmingham took over the Royal Town of Sutton Coldfield in 1974 it has gained a very large area of open Country side which in future years may well be built on bringing more people int live in Birmingham unlike the City of Manchester which is hemmed in. As a Brummie I always get fed up with people running my great City Down for no reason
Yes Portsmouth has its own conurbation which doesn't include Southampton. Gosport, Fareham, Portchester, Waterlooville and Havant are all joined at the hip to Pompey and are often referred to by the media as Greater Portsmouth.
Yes, try telling a Salfordian that they are Mancunians, or that the 'Plastic Scousers' of Sefton and Kirkby are Liverpudlians, along with those across the Mersey on the Wirral, such as Birkenhead and Wallasey.
@@philipjackson5818 Good luck trying to find the cathedrals in Sunderland, Preston or Brighton (to name just three). You'll spend a long time searching, before coming to the conclusion that you might just be wrong!
@sydnorth5868 failed exam again, oh dear. First place I checked Preston and look what I found a cathedral Syro-Malbar Cathedral of Alphonsa. Sorry you cannot re sit this exam.
A city doesn't have to have a cathedral. I live in Southampton which doesn't have a cathedral, but it was granted City status by a Charter in 1964 ( Queen Elizabeth II). The population of Southampton is around 250,000, much larger than Winchester, or Salisbury which do have cathedrals.
No, it’s in the County of Bristol. It was in Avon, but that ceased to exist when it was scratched by the Tories in 1996. It was its own county prior to Avon and is once more now. To my knowledge it has never been part of Gloucestershire, even though Glos CCC play many of their home matches in Bristol.
God bless us thank you so much for sharing this video. Regards to all of you there in your country. Thank you so much. From Lani D. Nepomuceno, Philippines 🇵🇭
If Leeds includes Bradford and Wakefield, why doesn’t Sheffield include Rotherham, Barnsley, Doncaster and Chesterfield? You’re comparing totally different population statistics.
Who ever compiled this list needs to go back to the drawing board it appears that the stats have been compiled by metro areas and urban areas not by city populations it’s a complete mosh mash and not accurate at all. Birmingham city for example has over 1 million and is twice the population as Manchester City .Manchester is a city in Greater Manchester not the other way around and the city has a population less than 600.000 . Lists should be compiled either by city proper, urban or metro populations not a combination of them in one list as it will not be accurate. As for this second city debate there isnt one Birmingham is easily the second largest city .
Must admit I always thought there is a reason why Brum is called "the second city", and Glasgow "the empire city", they have for a couple of centuries always joined the Big Smoke as the 3 primary cities of the UK.
The actual population of Newcastle itself at the last census was just over 300000 so the figures on here must include plenty other areas like Gateshead,north tyneside etc
Wrong flag for London 🏴 capital of England like you put the Scottish flag for Edinburgh. Please don’t erase English identity. Thanks from an Englishman I also don’t identify as British but as English only and hope for independence one day and a national party for England like they do for wales and Scotland. ✌️
So let me get this right Southampton includes Portsmouth, Nottingham includes Derby, Manchester includes all its satellite towns, Birmingham includes Wolverhampton and all the Black Country (probably Coventry as well), Newcastle includes Sunderland and Gateshead, but Sheffield doesn't include Barnsley or Doncaster (all similar distances away as some of the other areas described)? This is absolute rubbish. And before you say there is countryside between them, there is for many of these others!!! Nicely presented video though and nice to see some great shots of the cities of the UK!!!
@@colemason1623 I know it doesn't. My comment was that the video didn't seem to make this distinction. I think anyone who knows English football will know the intense rivalry between the two cities. Nottingham and Derby have the same although not on the same level I think, the passion in the North East takes it up to a whole other level!!!
@suppleberry3863 I don't understand what this is supposed to mean!!! South Hampshire isn't a city, neither is West Yorkshire or even Greater Manchester for that matter. I'm talking about cities. So posting a link to urban areas, many of which are groups of towns and cities that have countryside between them I find a bit odd.
You can't get two lists that are the same. Some club two cities together on the list like Leeds/Bradford. Some put the population of Manchester at 395 thousand, while others put it at 2.7 million, because some use the entire population of the 'Greater' area as the population of the city, which is a much smaller area. Historically it was always 1) London 2) Birmingham 3) Manchester 4) Sheffield 5) Leeds. Now there are no consistent lists, and some cities have population sizes attributed to them that bear no relationship to their historical averages. So Liverpool, Bristol, Nottingham, and Newcastle have 'populations' that have gone from 200-400 thousand previously, to 700-900 thousand, seemingly on the whim of the person writing the list.
The last count put the population of the City of Manchester at around 590,000. If you're going to go on City populations, the City of London wouldn't make the list, it's the population of Greater London people use. Second place goes to Brum (1.1 million), 3rd/4th place either Liverpool or Glasgow (600K), 5th/6th/7th are Leeds, Manchester and Sheffield, all just under 600K
@paultaylor7082 And those figures will be contradicted by the next Google search from a legitimate source. They can't agree the numbers from one day to the next.
Not a mystery, Manchester metro is bigger than Birmingham metro, if he went by city boundary than Birmingham is 3x the size as Birmingham, Manchester is the 12th largest city, smaller than Cardiff and only slightly bigger than Stoke on Trent. Birmingham is the second largest city within it's ciry boundaries.
You are right if we take into account populations of strict Cities. Then both Birmingham and even Leeds are bigger than Manchester. And... London is very small - its City has maybe 8000 inhabitants? 🙂 It doesn't make much sense, so it is better to count a metropolitan area. And so was done (and told) above.
@@frodehagen8690 not really in the scheme of things but I do like things to be correct.No harm in that is there.Birmingham was always termed UK's second city..
London’s metro population is 14.9 million. Urban population 9.76 million. Total population 8.86 million Birmingham metro population 4.3milion, urban population 2.5 million. Total population 1.15 million. Hes mixing up urban and metropolitan populations
The problem with basing the numbers on the population of a Metropolitan Area, is that nobody can agree what should or should not be included. The only consensus is that everyone seems happy to include the population of the whole of Greater London, rather than just the City of London (which in itself wouldn't make the top 40). Yet Greater London also contains the City of Westminster. That being the case then it seems reasonable to include the population of Salford (also a city in it's own right) in the ranking for Manchester. The next logical progression is to include the whole of Greater Manchester. But then where do you stop? Leeds and Bradford are both cities, but their built up areas are (just about) contiguous. Is Bradford part of the Leeds Metropolitan Area? Or not? What about Birmingham and Wolverhampton (or Coventry)? Measuring the size of cities by population is not an exact science, as the comments to this video have proven. If you stick to the populations of the city limits, then the top 10 in England (apologies to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland) based on the last census are: 1. Birmingham (1.1m) 2. Leeds (822k) 3. Manchester (568k) 4. Sheffield (566k) 5. Bradford (552k) 6. Liverpool (496k) 7. Bristol (479k) 8. Leicester (373k) 9. Wakefield (357k) 10. Coventry (355k)
@@williamwalker481Everyone loves to downgrade Manchester. Why? It is easily the most important city after London. The sheer pettiness of some on here. Does anyone with half an o-level think Manchester ranks 6th, apart from its contained population which is because Salford with 300.000 people has separate city status. Of the top twenty biggest places in England all of Greater Manchester’s boroughs feature except Bury and that has a population of 200.000. Ridiculous parochialism. Manchester has no regional rival, it is in another league. It’s airport carries more passengers then every other airport outside London combined.
the real Top 5 are 1 London. 2 Bham. 3 Glasgow. 4 Liverpool. 5 Leeds. i have studied this and watched every video on the subject i can find and come to the conclusion there is a lot of Prejudice and discrimination involved for certain big cities such as Liverpool and Glasgow so many hidden agendas and people promoting cities like manchester , bradford, sheffield , bristol which are nowhere as big as the real top 5 i listed with Manchester for example people get confused between "Greater Manchester" the county and Manchester itself the city not including Salford. Facts are facts
Just to counter some of the adverse comments people have made, I can confirm, as a native who has researched this, that the figure for Leicester of 562,000 is about right, even if the city itself only has 350,000 inhabitants. The city boundary has not materially changed since 1935 but the urban build-up makes that boundary seem rather arbitrary for about 80% of its distance. I assume that the Nottingham figure must include not only places separated by a few miles of open countryside like Eastwood, Ilkeston and Heanor but also the rather more distant Derby.
@@britishstatistics that is exactly what I wrote in my comment above , for example people from Salford do not class themselves as Mancunians but rather Salfordians
Last census put Manchester's population at 590,000. The area of Greater Manchester, population nearly 2.8 million, is the second most densely populated area per square mile in the UK, beaten only by Greater London.
Sadly I don't agree Bradford has a population of 568000 as at end of 2023. That should put it in your top 10 but it doesn't appear? So your list is incorrect. If you're going to make a video of this you should get your facts correct it's not that difficult, Google it!!!
The Southampton figure does not include the population of Portsmouth... The population of the entire South Hampshire /M27 corridor is approx 2.9 million. I'm guessing these figures only include neighbouring areas.
With a population of almost 600K, Manchester is hardly a village. Also the Greater Manchester area, with a population of almost 2.8 million inhabitants, is the second most densely populated area in the UK, after Greater London. It overtook the West Midlands some time ago as regards inhabitants per square mile, it now has overtaken it as regards total population.
My immediate thought when starting to watch this this was City != Metropolitan area. My second thought was this is from the people who try to make out that Manchester is bigger than Birmingham and Leeds. I was not disappointed. Mancunians: you keep the _city_ of Salford out of your hegemonic claims and Brum will not claim West Bromwich, Worcester, Bromsgrove, Lichfield, Coventry, Warwick, Rugby . . .
It would be great to have all these areas classed in the West Midlands officially as it would make Birmingham/ West Midlands as big as London. Under new arrangements most of these areas are working with the Greater Birmingham Chamber of Commerce and are gaining from it
@@Glasgowurbanwildlife Do _you_ include the City of Salford in the City of Manchester? Manchester has a population of about 500k, Birmingham twice that.
@@Glasgowurbanwildlife So where did you get that fact from, I think you are mistakenly thinking of Greater Manchester which my friend is not the City of Manchester only joined by the word Manchester, you see they are two different identities, Greater Manchester is the name of the Metropolitan County Council that was set up in 1974 taking over South East Lancashire and North East Cheshire which was such a long drawn out name the powers to be named it Greater Manchester containing a lot of separate towns and Cities in the area such as Greater Birmingham, oh sorry the West Midlands Metropolitan Council did. But you are comparing the size of a Metropolitan County, Greater Manchester with the size of a City, the City of Birmingham, but I am sorry to disappoint you try looking it up, The City of Birmingham ( not the West Midlands) dwarf the City of Manchester ( not Greater Manchester ) in that the City of Birmingham's boundaries are 150 sq miles in area and a population of 1.5 Million plus in the City alone not counting the West Midlands and the size of The City of Manchester ( Not Greater Manchester County Council) is only 58 Sq miles in area and the City of Manchester has only a population of around 560 to 580,000 Citizens even Bristol and Liverpool are officially bigger than the City of Manchester, so no the City of Manchester is not slightly larger than the City of Birmingham, in fact Birmingham dwarfs Manchester in size and population and that is why Birmingham is officially the Second City of the UK, do your research like I have first.
Sorry don't know where you are getting your information from on this video but the City of Manchester has not got 2,770,000 citizens, it has only got 580,000 citizens and Birmingham has a population of 1.5 million citizens and that is the official UK Government statistics , this makes the City of Birmingham officially the Second Largest City in the UK as per the UK Government and the City of Manchester in 8th position. In this video you are doing the stupid thing of comparing Metropolitan County Councils to Cities, Metropolitan County Councils are not Cities, they are local Government that just look after local transport, trade and other public services are not Cities, but do have towns and Cities with in there boundary and are equivalent to County Councils such as Warwickshire and Devon so this video is talking a load of Rubbish who ever made this video needs to do more research on this matter, Greater Manchester is NOT a CITY it is just a metropolitan county council, the size of Cities are measured on the actual city alone so this count can only be done comparing the City of Birmingham, Liverpool and Manchester to one another.
Omg. No wonder there are «wars» going on. Does it really matter how big the city is as long as it is a nice place to live? Google eg. Oslo Norway. It just passed 700000 ihb. but in reality it is over 1 million, and 1,8 mill. in the metro area.. Not that I care, but the list here was sooooo wrong :-)
I read somewhere that Oslo counted it´s metropolitan area in an almost 100km radius from the city centre. I guess the cities in the U.K have alot higher people density
Population doesn't matter much anyway. When I was a kid in the 70s, there was no doubt Birmingham was the second city and always in the news. Now...only someone from Birmingham would think that. Manchester has clearly outstripped Birmingham in importance. I live in London and Birmingham never comes up. I regard Manchester as the only serious rival.
London is a tiny city. Only the financial district (inside the old roman wall) is the city of london and population is tiny. I believe it is still the smallest city in the country as it is just smaller than wells - but i could be wrong on that last bit.
The City of London is the original city, city status was awarded so that the King's tolls could be enforced on the Thames. Greater London (the amalgam of the City, central London, Middlesex, some bits of Surrey and one or two other counties) is not the entire metro area, let alone the extended unbroken urban area of London which covers 13-14 million people.
@darthwiizius correct. As I said, the city of London is extremely small. The rest is greater London which only has county status where the rest of the boroughs do indeed make up a huge area and large population. But the only cities in London are London city and Westminster which has a bigger population that the city of London.
@@sx200n1 Greater London also holds city status in it's own right. London though is a complicated place to describe in usual terms because we tend to use the county area as the population instead of the total area. It's because it was constructed via sprawl until they adapted the Green Belt from Letchworth to restrict it which just transferred the sprawl to orbit towns like Reading, Watford, Hemel Hempstead, etc extending the unbroken area into large parts of the surrounding counties. If I were to define a simple border around London I'd probably use the equally inaccurate description of "everything inside the M25".
Birmingham has a much larger population then Manchester Manchesters population is only around 500k your including grater Manchester witch is towns in the surrounding areas like Oldham Rochdale Bolton and other places
This is all cobblers. Where do you get these numbers from? My city, Sheffield, is bigger than Manchester, and so is Bradford, Leeds and Liverpool. Nice try
I'm from Southampton. And unless the surrounding Cities of Southampton are included in the population then this is wrong. It holds roughly 1/4 of a million people is definitely not bigger than Bristol, Liverpool or Sheffield. Their like twice the size at least!
Glasgow has had boundaries on it down through the years scottish government should scrap the boundaries and make glasgow what it once was,way a population over a million people in the city.
These are the populations of the Metropolitan Areas, not the cities. Manchester must have recently overtaken Birmingham as the second largest conurbation, they were neck and neck in the last figures I saw. However, the City of Birmingham is much bigger than the City of Manchester, 1.1 million as opposed to 600K. Greater Manchester remains the most densely populated area outside of London as the West Midlands conurbation covers a greater area than Greater Manchester, so even when it had a larger population then Greater Manchester, it was less densely populated per square mile.
Southampton much smaller than that - they've lumped in the population of Portsmouth and the whole of South Hampshire, which is hilarious. Portsmouth and Southampton 2 separate towns about 20 miles apart
Many of these cities are no longer in their parent counties: they are their own unitary authorites, i.e., counties of their own. For example, Leicester is no longer in Leicestershire. Surrounded by it it, yes, but no longer in it.
The populations of all these cities seem grossly inflated. Probably including surrounding towns and cities within commuting distance, which really distorts the situation. Southampton's position in the list order is a joke. So, to a lesser extent, is Brighton's. And there's no way that Manchester is bigger than Birmingham.
Not sure were these figures originated. There is not really a reliable way of gauging the size of these agglomerations. The largest basic building block for this is the English regions and added to them Scotland, Wales and N. Ireland. These regions are not helpful in ascertaining city populations. The next area size are parliamentary constituencies which are of approximately 75000 people each. These areas are what are generally used to give a guide to the population of cities. These districts are also not very useful in determining city populations ie using this method puts Leeds as bigger than Manchester. The reason for this is that the constituencies also form a template for local governments representation.The real truth is that knowing the nominal population of a given named city is of no real use to geographers, were as having voting areas of similar size is.
Vương quốc Liên hiệp Anh và Bắc Ireland (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) Diện tích 242.500 km² Dân số 66.980.000🧍(2021) Được hợp nhất từ 4 Quốc gia 1. England 🏴 Diện tích 130.278 km² Dân số 56.490.048🧍 2. Scotland 🏴 Diện tích 77.925 km² Dân số 5.479.900🧍 3. Northern Ireland 🇮🇪 Diện tích 13.562 km² Dân số 1.903.175🧍 4. Wales 🏴 Diện tích 20.735 km² Dân số 3.107.494🧍 Nước Anh gồm vùng địa lý chia thành 48 Hạt nghi lễ (Hạt địa lý) Hạt ở Anh, số 'nghi lễ' truyền thống sẽ được sử dụng. Đó là 48 hạt riêng biệt tạo nên đất nước Anh. 9 Khu vùng địa lý của nước Anh 🏴 (England) Diện tích 130.278 km² Dân số 56.490.048🧍(thống kê dân số 2021) 1. Đông Bắc (North East) Diện tích: 8.573 km² Dân số 2.647.013🧍 2. Tây Bắc (North West) Diện tích: 14.105 km² Dân số 7.417.397🧍 3. Yorkshire and Humber Diện tích:15.408 km² Dân số 5.480.777🧍 4.Tây Midlands (West Midlands) Diện tích: 13.000 km Dân số 5.961.929🧍 5. Trung du phía đông (East Midlands) Diện tích: 15.627 km² Dân số 4.865.583🧍 6.Tây Nam Bộ (South West) Diện tích: 23.800 km² Dân số 5.659.143🧍 7. Đông Nam (South East) Diện tích:19.070 km² Dân số 9.278.065🧍 8. Phía đông (East) Diện tịch 19.120 km² Dân số 6.269.161🧍 9. Greater London Diện tích: 1.569 km² Dân số 8.799.728🧍 Danh sách các hạt của Anh 🏴 Các hạt nghi lễ của Anh Bảng tất cả 48 hạt của Anh vào năm 2023, được gọi chính thức là "các hạt nghi lễ của Anh", như được định nghĩa trong Đạo luật về nghĩa vụ quân sự năm 1997, phân biệt chúng với các khu vực hành chính của chính quyền địa phương. Các hạt của nước Anh còn được gọi là "các hạt địa lý của Anh" vì chúng bao gồm các ranh giới và đặc điểm tự nhiên vĩnh viễn. “Các quận lịch sử của nước Anh” đã phát triển từ nước Anh bộ lạc thành các khu vực hành chính trong thời kỳ chiếm đóng của người La Mã và người Norman. 48 Hạt nghi lễ Nước Anh theo khu vực 1. Đông Bắc (North East) gồm có 3 hạt là 1 Durham Diện tích 2.721 km² Dân số 862.600 2 Northumberland Diện tích 5.013 km² Dân số 319.000 3 Tyne and Wear Diện tích 540 km² Dân số 1.129.500 2. Tây Bắc (North West) gồm có 5 hạt là 1 Cheshire Diện tích 2.343 km² Dân số 1.054.100 2 Cumbria Diện tích 6.767 km² Dân số 498.400 3 Greater Manchester Diện tích 1.276 km² Dân số 2.798.800 4 Lancashire Diện tích 3.075 km² Dân số 1.490.500 5 Merseyside Diện tích 647 km² Dân số 1.416.800 3 Yorkshire and Humber gồm có 4 hạt là 1 East Riding of Yorkshire Diện tích 2.479 km² Dân số 598.700 2 North Yorkshire Diện tích 8.654 km² Dân số 1.153.400 3 South Yorkshire Diện tích 1.152 km² Dân số 1.393.400 4 West Yorkshire Diện tích 2.029 km² Dân số 2.307.000 4. Tây Midlands (West Midlands) gồm có 6 hạt là 1 Herefordshire Diện tích 2.180 km² Dân số 191.000 2 Shropshire Diện tích 3.488 km² Dân số 493.200 3 Staffordshire Diện tích 2.714 km² Dân số 1.126.200 4 Warwickshire Diện tích 1.975 km² Dân số 564.600 5 West Midlands Diện tích 902 km² Dân số 2.897.300 6 Worcestershire Diện tích 1.741 km² Dân số, 588.400 5. Trung du phía đông (East Midlands) gồm có 6 hạt là 1 Derbyshire Diện tích 2.625 km² Dân số 1.049.000 2 Leicestershire Diện tích 2.156 km² Dân số 1.043.800 3 Lincolnshire Diện tích 6.975 km² Dân số 1.082.300 4 Northamptonshire Diện tích 2.364 km² Dân số 741.200 5 Nottinghamshire Diện tích 2.159 km² Dân số 1.147.100 6 Rutland Diện tích 382 km² Dân số 39.500 6. Tây Nam Bộ (South West) gồm có 7 hạt là 1 Bristol Diện tích 110 km² Dân số 463.405 2 Cornwall Diện tích 3.546 km² Dân số 565.968 3 Devon Diện tích 6.707 km² Dân số, 1.185.500 4 Dorset Diện tích 2.653 km² Dân số 770.700 5 Gloucestershire Diện tích 3.150 km² Dân số 907.200 6 Somerset Diện tích 4.170 km² Dân số 956.700 7 Wiltshire Diện tích 3.485 km² Dân số 716.400 7. Đông Nam (South East) gồm có 9 hạt là 1 Berkshire Diện tích 1.262 km² Dân số 905.800 2 Buckinghamshire Diện tích 1.874 km² Dân số 803.400 3 East Sussex Diện tích 1.791 km² Dân số 840.400 4 Hampshire Diện tích 3.769 km² Dân số 1.837.800 5 Isle of Wight Diện tích 384 km² Dân số 141.000 6 Kent Diện tích 3.738 km² Dân số 1.832.300 7 Oxfordshire Diện tích 2.605 km² Dân số 682.400 8 Surrey Diện tích 1.663 km² Dân số 1.185.300 9 West Sussex Diện tích 1.991 km² Dân số 852.400 8. Phía Đông (East) gồm có 6 hạt là 1 Bedfordshire Diện tích 1.235 km² Dân số 664.600 2 Cambridgeshire Diện tích 3.390 km² Dân số 847.200 3 Essex Diện tích 3.670 km² Dân số, 1.820.400 4 Hertfordshire Diện tích 1.643 km² Dân số 1.180.900 5 Norfolk Diện tích 5.380 km² Dân số, 898.400 6 Suffolk Diện tích 3.801km² Dân số 757.000 9. Greater London (Greater London) Diện tích 1.569 km² Dân số 8.817.300 1 City of London Diện tích 2,9 km² Dân số. 7.700
Yes, about 300000 people in Newcastle Upon Tyne. This figure they are using is Tyneside(though not Wearside) It must include, Gateshead, North Tyneside and South Tyneside as well.(though not Sunderland)
It shouldn't be called "cities",what is traditionally in UK understood as something inside city borders. Even though it can be strange, inadequate, like City of London. In this case you showed (mostly informal) metropolitan areas, what makes more sense. i
How could you put Southampton ahead of Bristol, Edinburgh, Liverpool and Sheffield? That is crazy!
@@richardhussey-cq2se Liverpool is massive a lot bigger than people think
These are the populations of the conurbations, not the cities. For example, the West Midlands area has a population of 2.7 million, of which around 1.1 million people live in the City of Birmingham. Greater Manchester has a population of 2.8 million, of which around 600,000 live in the City of Manchester. Just imagine how few people actually live in the City of London, as opposed to Greater London.
@paultaylor7082 Liverpool is actually one of the biggest cities but it always gets left out due to the prejudice it gets from outsiders
@@paultaylor7082 Yes. But the city council populations of Bristol, Edinburgh, Liverpool and Sheffield are all around half a million. Southampton a quarter of a million.
@@paultaylor7082
London is on a different scale mate, Greater London is not the entirety of the metropolitan area of London, let alone the extended unbroken urban area of London which extends into Essex, Herts, Kent, the Sussexes, Berkshire, Surrey. Vids like this are a little misleading, to refer to [for example] the Merseyside conurbation as Liverpool's metro area is a wee bit shabby and lazy, same with Brum and Manc-chester. The comparable area of the London conurbation has a population of 13-14 million people. For context I live about 40 miles north of Leicester Square, once you get south of Hatfield you're basically inside the edge of town.
Inaccurate video. Birmingham is bigger than Manchester
Why is RUclips so crap?
Do you understand the concept of a Metropolitan Area?
@@StuArch1 Manchester is a farce all they did was swallow up all the surrounding towns and call it Greater Manchester which makes it look massive but they are still towns in there own right. manchester itself is tiny if you just look at the boundary of the "city" not including Salford
@@oooooo-ji2nn who are you replying to...what are you referring to?.....Birmingham IS bigger than manchester .....as a city AND as a conurbation.
And Liverpool is definitely bigger than Southampton.....this video is obviously bollocks.
Those population stats are not city proper figures. Birmingham is the only other city in the UK after London that has a population of 1 million plus.
These figures a re a joke compared with the Wikipedia figures. Everyone knows that Birmingham is way bigger than Manchester.
True
As is Glasgow.
This is the metropolitan areas not the city. GREATER MANCHESTER IS BIGGER THAN THE WEST MIDLANDS IN AREA AND POPULATION. Two cities and eight metropolitan boroughs
Yawn. Who cares. Manchester is way ahead of Birmingham at everything.
Bristol is not in Gloucestershire. It is The City and County of Bristol. I was a child there in the 1950s, Bristolians are very proud of their status.
Birmingham is one local authority, where the West Midlands covers several. Manchester is much smaller than Birmingham
They've probably included the combined populations of the City of Manchester and Greater Manchester..Birmingham is our 2nd city..and larger overall....these are inaccurate figures...for instance..in the case of Liverpool..was the population of the Wirral included in the count ..being part of Merseyside....and Gateshead for Newcastle Under Tyne ?
The population on here is for the birmingham built up area which includes wolverhampton,coventry and all the other surrounding towns ! The manchester built up area is slightly larger!
The same could be said for london
@@susansmiles2242 Indeed, the City of London only has a few thousand people in it.
The truth is Manchester is part of a near uninterrupted urban arc stretching from Liverpool to Sheffield, whereas Birmingham is a tiny speck in a virtual desert beyond Solihull.
I feel like someone from either Manchester or Southampton made this list n put their city alot higher than where it should be.
Bit misleading as the poster is including metro areas when it suits and missing them out when it doesn’t
1.7 million in Glasgow metro area
Have you been to Manchester? It is massive, almost 3 million in the conurbation.😂
@@johnwilson3842 Sorry there are not 3 million people living in the City of Manchester, the official recorded population size of the City of Manchester is only 580,000 citizens.
@@peterwilliamallen1063 It's interesting really...there are no clear definitions used here...the London population figure is reflective of all of Greater London...it includes places like Romford, Croydon, Bromley and so forth. London's population is always measured in this way..whereas other large UK cities are not. Manchester's M postcode area which covers the continuous city area (ie the bits of the city which now sit in Bury, Salford, Rochdale and so forth but not those towns in themselves eg Prestwich, Manchester sits in Bury Metropolitan Council area) has a population of 1.2 million. The London postcode area (is areas which have N, NW, SE, SW, E, W, EC, EC postcodes) has a population of 5.4 million. To have parity with how London's population is calculated, the built up area's population should be used in each case. It's the fairest way of comparing...or we determine that London's population is much smaller than has been quoted for decades.....
@@davidowen2396 David Owen, Postcodes do not denote a Cities area or population, all a Post Code is a Postal district and is set up by the Post Office for Postal Sorting areas, London has been as such since the early part of the 20th century and this has nothing what so ever how big a City is or what position it is in, in the West Midlands there are Towns like Solihull and parts of Sandwell that have a Birmingham "B" Post Code and also areas such as Water Orton and Coleshill in Warwickshire have "B" Birmingham post Codes and as I have mentioned these are just for the Post office to sort their Mail out into Postal districts so no matter how people manipulate things the position of a City goes solely by the size of it's Population, the figure you state of 1.2 million is for the area known as Greater Manchester Metropolitan County and the population of the Metropolitan County of the West Midlands is 2.65 million, but this goes only on the population of a CITY defined by that Cities population and it's Cities boundary, as I have mentioned the Official population size of the City of Manchester is 560.000 citizens and the population of the City of Birmingham is over 1.5 million Citizens making Birmingham the second largest CITY in the UK officially. The Greater Manchester metro county is not a City but just a county so how can this be classed as the second largest city when it isn't a City, the City of Manchester is the City.
First time I've heard my home town, Brighton, has 617,000 inhabitants. From what I know, Brighton and Hove has a combined population of around 250,000 and the Greater Brighton conurbation that includes towns like Worthing and Littlehampton has a population of around 400,000. 617,000 is way off the mark.
It includes places such as Littlehampton and Seaford, which brings it up to that number
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_urban_areas_in_the_United_Kingdom
Have you seen the Southampton figure? Even more ridiculous!
The real top 5 largest cities in the UK are 1 London. 2 Birmingham. 3 Glasgow. 4 Liverpool. 5 Leeds
True
No. Birmingham is the largest city. The CITY of London is tiny, only just over a square mile with a population of 8,616 (2021 census). What people call 'London' is really Greater London and has the status of a county.
@AndrewofWare you keep believing that I go by the blob on the map
I thought Leeds was the 3rd largest city. London 1st then Birmingham, then Leeds.
@jahmah519 no that's what they want you to believe due to the prejudice Liverpool always gets they don't put out the real statistics. Geocities is the only one to tell the actual stats
From someone with a bit of geography knowledge here, when you look at what is classed as the true city size which is basically the city centre and then all its inner subburbs ie the urban sprawl and density areas that extend out then obviously london is first, Birmingham 2nd, leeds 3rd and Manchester 4th. Greater manchester is almost 2 times the size of leeds but calling places like bury and Stockport manchester you then might as well have bradford and wakefield as part of leeds which would then take leeds to nearly size of manchester!
I wonder how people in Bradford feel knowing that their city is now officially part of Leeds?
I mean it is now under “Leeds city region” wonder how they feel about that
Upgraded is probably the answer.
Leeds City Region or Greater Leeds by any other name.
@@ianhachimore importantly how do the people of leeds feel about being mentioned in the same breath as Bradford 😮
Yeah, and Wakefield, Huddersfield, Castleford, Pontefract, Selby, Wetherby, Skipton, Harrogate,
Top five by population of City Proper are London, Birmingham, Leeds, Glasgow and Sheffield.
No idea when the entire population of West and North Yorkshire became Leeds, no idea when the entire population of Nottinghamshire became Nottingham, no idea when the entire population of Hampshire became Southampton, the entire population of North East England became Newcastle, the entire population of Merseyside became Liverpool, the entire population of Greater Manchester became Manchester but the entire population of South Yorkshire, North Derbyshire and North Nottinghamshire didn't become Sheffield, even though these areas are ACTUALLY SHEFFIELD with ACTUAL SHEFFIELD POSTCODES.
But if we are measuring stupid figures like that then the entire population of people with an "S" Postcode for Sheffield is about 2 million, it stretches from WF (Wakefield in the North) to NG (Nottingham to the South) DE (Derby to the West and South West) and DN (Doncaster to the East)
Absolute bunkum. So many discrepancies. No way is Southampton a larger city than Liverpool or Bristol. And Bristol isn't and never has been in Gloucestershire, it's a county in its own right.
Population figures for Southampton include Portsmouth because it's metropolitan, that's why it's so high. Cities are listed as counties, not local areas.
@@britishstatistics Again, it should be listed as Southampton/Portsmouth then. Southampton and Portsmouth is not a conurbation, they are 20 miles apart and there is open countryside between the two cities. I used to live in Portsmouth and I know the people there would regard it as an insult to be labelled as part of Southampton.
Liverpool is massive! it's even bigger than Leeds and manchester but never gets the credit it deserves due to all the Prejudice and Discrimination it gets from the Media's lies. Fact
@@britishstatistics 🤦♂️
@@britishstatistics How can a city be classed as a county it’s one or the other ,it’s not hard to research this stuff.
This list is entirely inaccurate and misleading, these population figures are for the entire sub division metropolitan areas and not the city's themselves, the Leeds population figure includes Bradford, kirklees and Wakefield
Indeed whereas the Glasgow number is Glasgow metro only
I used to deliver to people in Bradford and Wakefield the look on their faces when I asked them how come the postcode is Bd17 then it says Leeds underneath same as some Wf postcodes 👍
Wakefield is a regional partner with Leeds but is a separate metropolitan district and does not come under leeds at all
The wf3 postcode comes under leeds
I'm from Leeds and have to say thr population quoted seems well over the top, but why it would include Bradford, which is a big city in its own right, is frankly beyond me
These are conurbation statistics. When they say Southampton they're including Portsmouth, Fareham, Eastleigh, Winchester etc, same with Newcastle they've included Gateshead and Sunderland and the rest of the area.
Sunderland and Newcastle are two entirely different cities
They don’t include Sunderland
@@esckings-ts9vdthe figure provided is Tyne and wear so yes they do
Tyne and Wear is made up of 5 boroughs (separate councils). ‘Tyneside’ being Gateshead, Newcastle, north/ south Tyneside, combined population of 830,000. Sunderland’s borough makes up the Tyne and Wear with a population of around 340,000. 🫨
@@johnmurray5573Newcastle’s population is around 300,000.
These are all asked on catchment areas and counties & not on contiguous solid built up areas. Greater Manchester is based on a catchment area with differing accents & sometimes countryside & fields in between. Leeds is a collective of two cities and a collective of large and small towns according to this. Birmingham, Liverpool, Glasgow & Sheffield or Edinburgh are all sold short in this video all you have to do is some research & the real proof of the pudding is a visit to each conglomerate
This video is taking the populations of Metropolitan County Councils and making out that it is the population of a City, the official population size of the City of Birmingham is over 1.5 million citizens making it the second largest UK City and the official population size of the City of Manchester is only 580,000 making it the 8th largest City in the UK,
@@peterwilliamallen1063 Birmingham is a big city proper it took the mantle as the 2nd most populous city proper in 1961. From Glasgow which had at its peak of 1.127.000 in 1938 in its city proper. It has 635.000 in its city proper now but has a contiguous built up area of 1.3 to 1.8 million if you want to use other methods. Manchester is the centre of the 2nd most built up area in Western Europe after Rhine Ruhr in Germany.
Newcastle upon Tyne has a city population of some 270.000 & a grater urban area of over 1 million.
Etc etc
@@peterwilliamallen1063 I often bite my lip when I hear Mancunians stating that Manchester is on a par with London without even considering that it’s an urban county made up of differing towns even surrounded by countryside etc though I do understand due to this GMC wields much economic power as well as political and cultural influence but I don’t like how they brush off places especially Birmingham & Glasgow as smaller towns etc.
@@ScranMan-oi8qg If you google this subject you will find that Birmingham took second City status in 1918 not 1961 as you stated and that this subject is entitled "Top 15 Cities in the UK by Population 2022", but it is listing most cities not in the size of population of the City but the Metropolitan Council, Manchester is the one that always crops up by Mancunians, they get mixed up between Greater Manchester and the City of Manchester which even though the name Manchester is in both titles they are two independent things, Greater Manchester is one of the Metropolitan Councils set up in 1971 like the West Midlands and Merseyside Metro Council to look after transport. Police, Fire, Ambulance and roads in the council area set up by the UK Government and is not a CITY as this video seems to make people believe and the City of Manchester which is the City and the City of Manchester's population is only 580,000 citizens and the City area is approximately 50 sq miles, where as the Population of the City f Birmingham is over 1.5 million citizens living in the City of Birmingham and it's area is approximately 150 sq miles plus the City Council of Birmingham has a Lord Mayor and is the largest urban City Council in Europe, not only that the population of the City of Glasgow is only 608,000 not what you stated again that is the population of Greater Glasgow and this makes Glasgow bigger than Manchester. All this can be found if you google it. These City sizes have nothing to do with urban area sizes just the population of a City with in it's boundaries.
@@ScranMan-oi8qg This has always been the case as far as I can remember, when I was a young teenager in the 1970's Manchester was always saying it was the second City of the UK and even now stating silly reason's such as Manchester United being so well known, but the UK Government has always stated Birmingham as being the second City due to it's population size, at the moment it stands in the City boundary at about 1.5 million citizens but that will start growing as more high rise apartments are being built in Birmingham City Center and since Birmingham took over the Royal Town of Sutton Coldfield in 1974 it has gained a very large area of open Country side which in future years may well be built on bringing more people int live in Birmingham unlike the City of Manchester which is hemmed in. As a Brummie I always get fed up with people running my great City Down for no reason
Greater Manchester is a county not a City.
Hello peter, how are you doing today.
Manchester city not country
Greater Manchester is not a county it’s an administrative district combining many places
@@susansmiles2242 Google says it's a metropolitan County same as West Midlands. ..
@@secondcity11 Greater Manchester may be classed as a county but Manchester is a city within that area
These are urban areas. The stats aren't correct when you think of how many people actually live in the city.
Fancy telling Portsmouth people that they're part of Southampton. They are a fiercely independent island race on the other side of that stream.
Yea video is pretty ignorant and inaccurate
Yes Portsmouth has its own conurbation which doesn't include Southampton. Gosport, Fareham, Portchester, Waterlooville and Havant are all joined at the hip to Pompey and are often referred to by the media as Greater Portsmouth.
Yes, try telling a Salfordian that they are Mancunians, or that the 'Plastic Scousers' of Sefton and Kirkby are Liverpudlians, along with those across the Mersey on the Wirral, such as Birkenhead and Wallasey.
I would say Southampton and Portsmouth is one large Metropolitan Area,which it is.
This list just goes along with every day narratives Sheffield and Bradford (not even mentioned) are way higher up the list than this
I think Sheffield is in it somewhere but not Bradford. I agree it's misleading.
A city title is issued by the Crown, it has to have local government and a cathedral to qualify, plus a population amongs other requirements.
It doesn't have to have a cathedral to be a city.
@sydnorth5868 incorrect answer, failed exam.
@@philipjackson5818 Good luck trying to find the cathedrals in Sunderland, Preston or Brighton (to name just three). You'll spend a long time searching, before coming to the conclusion that you might just be wrong!
@sydnorth5868 failed exam again, oh dear.
First place I checked Preston and look what I found a cathedral Syro-Malbar Cathedral of Alphonsa.
Sorry you cannot re sit this exam.
A city doesn't have to have a cathedral. I live in Southampton which doesn't have a cathedral, but it was granted City status by a Charter in 1964 ( Queen Elizabeth II). The population of Southampton is around 250,000, much larger than Winchester, or Salisbury which do have cathedrals.
Liverpool should be higher on the list! it's much bigger than Southampton!
Who moved Bristol into Gloucestershire? It's in Avon, isn't it??
No, it’s in the County of Bristol. It was in Avon, but that ceased to exist when it was scratched by the Tories in 1996. It was its own county prior to Avon and is once more now. To my knowledge it has never been part of Gloucestershire, even though Glos CCC play many of their home matches in Bristol.
God bless us thank you so much for sharing this video. Regards to all of you there in your country. Thank you so much. From Lani D. Nepomuceno, Philippines 🇵🇭
God bless you Lani too!
Bristol has to my knowledge never been in a county and certainly ain’t now in Gloucestershire.
Hello John, how are you doing today.
It is now
If Leeds includes Bradford and Wakefield, why doesn’t Sheffield include Rotherham, Barnsley, Doncaster and Chesterfield? You’re comparing totally different population statistics.
Utter rubbish. Southampton population is about 250 k and Brighton similar
I thought exactly the same
God bless us thank you so much for sharing this video. From Lani D. Nepomuceno, Philippines 🇵🇭
Glasgow is no longer in Lanarkshire it is now classed as The City and County of Glasgow.
Who ever compiled this list needs to go back to the drawing board it appears that the stats have been compiled by metro areas and urban areas not by city populations it’s a complete mosh mash and not accurate at all. Birmingham city for example has over 1 million and is twice the population as Manchester City .Manchester is a city in Greater Manchester not the other way around and the city has a population less than 600.000 . Lists should be compiled either by city proper, urban or metro populations not a combination of them in one list as it will not be accurate. As for this second city debate there isnt one Birmingham is easily the second largest city .
Must admit I always thought there is a reason why Brum is called "the second city", and Glasgow "the empire city", they have for a couple of centuries always joined the Big Smoke as the 3 primary cities of the UK.
The actual population of Newcastle itself at the last census was just over 300000 so the figures on here must include plenty other areas like Gateshead,north tyneside etc
Wrong flag for London 🏴 capital of England like you put the Scottish flag for Edinburgh. Please don’t erase English identity. Thanks from an Englishman I also don’t identify as British but as English only and hope for independence one day and a national party for England like they do for wales and Scotland. ✌️
Background music name please
So let me get this right Southampton includes Portsmouth, Nottingham includes Derby, Manchester includes all its satellite towns, Birmingham includes Wolverhampton and all the Black Country (probably Coventry as well), Newcastle includes Sunderland and Gateshead, but Sheffield doesn't include Barnsley or Doncaster (all similar distances away as some of the other areas described)? This is absolute rubbish. And before you say there is countryside between them, there is for many of these others!!! Nicely presented video though and nice to see some great shots of the cities of the UK!!!
Newcastle doesn’t include Sunderland on this list
@@colemason1623 I know it doesn't. My comment was that the video didn't seem to make this distinction. I think anyone who knows English football will know the intense rivalry between the two cities. Nottingham and Derby have the same although not on the same level I think, the passion in the North East takes it up to a whole other level!!!
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_urban_areas_in_the_United_Kingdom
@suppleberry3863 I don't understand what this is supposed to mean!!! South Hampshire isn't a city, neither is West Yorkshire or even Greater Manchester for that matter. I'm talking about cities. So posting a link to urban areas, many of which are groups of towns and cities that have countryside between them I find a bit odd.
@suppleberry3863 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_primary_urban_areas_in_England_by_population?wprov=sfla1
You can't get two lists that are the same. Some club two cities together on the list like Leeds/Bradford. Some put the population of Manchester at 395 thousand, while others put it at 2.7 million, because some use the entire population of the 'Greater' area as the population of the city, which is a much smaller area. Historically it was always 1) London 2) Birmingham 3) Manchester 4) Sheffield 5) Leeds.
Now there are no consistent lists, and some cities have population sizes attributed to them that bear no relationship to their historical averages. So Liverpool, Bristol, Nottingham, and Newcastle have 'populations' that have gone from 200-400 thousand previously, to 700-900 thousand, seemingly on the whim of the person writing the list.
The last count put the population of the City of Manchester at around 590,000. If you're going to go on City populations, the City of London wouldn't make the list, it's the population of Greater London people use. Second place goes to Brum (1.1 million), 3rd/4th place either Liverpool or Glasgow (600K), 5th/6th/7th are Leeds, Manchester and Sheffield, all just under 600K
@paultaylor7082
And those figures will be contradicted by the next Google search from a legitimate source. They can't agree the numbers from one day to the next.
Birmingham is the second largest city in the uk that is official .How you put Manchester above Birmingham is a mystery.
Not a mystery, Manchester metro is bigger than Birmingham metro, if he went by city boundary than Birmingham is 3x the size as Birmingham, Manchester is the 12th largest city, smaller than Cardiff and only slightly bigger than Stoke on Trent. Birmingham is the second largest city within it's ciry boundaries.
Birmingham is bigger than manchester
I don't think Manchester is bigger than Birmingham.Notsure if it's even bigger than Leeds.
You are right if we take into account populations of strict Cities. Then both Birmingham and even Leeds are bigger than Manchester. And... London is very small - its City has maybe 8000 inhabitants? 🙂 It doesn't make much sense, so it is better to count a metropolitan area. And so was done (and told) above.
It is much bigger, but does it matter?
@@frodehagen8690 not really in the scheme of things but I do like things to be correct.No harm in that is there.Birmingham was always termed UK's second city..
@@vonLaughter The city of London is not the city centre, but just the financial district.
Only has 500,000 population, Leeds Is bigger and Brum twice the size.
London’s metro population is 14.9 million. Urban population 9.76 million. Total population 8.86 million
Birmingham metro population 4.3milion, urban population 2.5 million. Total population 1.15 million.
Hes mixing up urban and metropolitan populations
Liverpool has a metropolitan area surrounding the city,Knowsley , Wirral,St Helens, Sefton, Halton metropolitan boroughs of the Liverpool City Region
yep....I have not got a clue where they come up with 900,000 its near 1.5 mill....
Birmingham is the second not manchester
How is Romford?
The problem with basing the numbers on the population of a Metropolitan Area, is that nobody can agree what should or should not be included.
The only consensus is that everyone seems happy to include the population of the whole of Greater London, rather than just the City of London (which in itself wouldn't make the top 40). Yet Greater London also contains the City of Westminster.
That being the case then it seems reasonable to include the population of Salford (also a city in it's own right) in the ranking for Manchester. The next logical progression is to include the whole of Greater Manchester.
But then where do you stop? Leeds and Bradford are both cities, but their built up areas are (just about) contiguous. Is Bradford part of the Leeds Metropolitan Area? Or not? What about Birmingham and Wolverhampton (or Coventry)?
Measuring the size of cities by population is not an exact science, as the comments to this video have proven.
If you stick to the populations of the city limits, then the top 10 in England (apologies to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland) based on the last census are:
1. Birmingham (1.1m)
2. Leeds (822k)
3. Manchester (568k)
4. Sheffield (566k)
5. Bradford (552k)
6. Liverpool (496k)
7. Bristol (479k)
8. Leicester (373k)
9. Wakefield (357k)
10. Coventry (355k)
Top 5 by population are 1 London 2 Birmingham 3 Glasgow 4 Leeds 5 sheffield.
Bristol 3 glasgow 4 liverpool 5 manchester 6th citys dont change boundaries
You're absolutely right, just switch Glasgow and Leeds around and you'll be spot on.
@@williamwalker481Everyone loves to downgrade Manchester. Why? It is easily the most important city after London. The sheer pettiness of some on here. Does anyone with half an o-level think Manchester ranks 6th, apart from its contained population which is because Salford with 300.000 people has separate city status. Of the top twenty biggest places in England all of Greater Manchester’s boroughs feature except Bury and that has a population of 200.000. Ridiculous parochialism. Manchester has no regional rival, it is in another league. It’s airport carries more passengers then every other airport outside London combined.
the real Top 5 are 1 London. 2 Bham. 3 Glasgow. 4 Liverpool. 5 Leeds. i have studied this and watched every video on the subject i can find and come to the conclusion there is a lot of Prejudice and discrimination involved for certain big cities such as Liverpool and Glasgow so many hidden agendas and people promoting cities like manchester , bradford, sheffield , bristol which are nowhere as big as the real top 5 i listed with Manchester for example people get confused between "Greater Manchester" the county and Manchester itself the city not including Salford. Facts are facts
@@garyrigby21 this is true
Saying Portsmouth is part of Southampton is like saying my home in northwest Surrey is part of reading
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_urban_areas_in_the_United_Kingdom
So Sheffield has gone from 4th or 5th to 10th, how did you come to that conclusion🤔
It that with migration or without 🤔
It looks very nice in this video..... reality isn't even close
Can the maker of the video not bear to show a St George’s flag for English cities?
Just to counter some of the adverse comments people have made, I can confirm, as a native who has researched this, that the figure for Leicester of 562,000 is about right, even if the city itself only has 350,000 inhabitants. The city boundary has not materially changed since 1935 but the urban build-up makes that boundary seem rather arbitrary for about 80% of its distance.
I assume that the Nottingham figure must include not only places separated by a few miles of open countryside like Eastwood, Ilkeston and Heanor but also the rather more distant Derby.
Nottingham doesn't include Derby just other neighbouring areas.
What about Oxford and Cambridge ?
Much smaller cities.
@@cocksniffer3116 Thank you so much 👍
The metropolitan population of London is 14.5 million
The city of Manchester has 2.77million people in it. I don't believe that. Even with all the tower blocks they've built.
Manchester on its own has just around 500 000 people where the Greater Manchester is with 2,7M +
The original city of Manchester has 500,000 people but the actual population which includes connected towns is the 2.7 Million
@@britishstatistics that is exactly what I wrote in my comment above , for example people from Salford do not class themselves as Mancunians but rather Salfordians
Last census put Manchester's population at 590,000. The area of Greater Manchester, population nearly 2.8 million, is the second most densely populated area per square mile in the UK, beaten only by Greater London.
Sadly I don't agree Bradford has a population of 568000 as at end of 2023. That should put it in your top 10 but it doesn't appear? So your list is incorrect. If you're going to make a video of this you should get your facts correct it's not that difficult, Google it!!!
The Southampton figure does not include the population of Portsmouth... The population of the entire South Hampshire /M27 corridor is approx 2.9 million. I'm guessing these figures only include neighbouring areas.
What nonsense! The population of the whole of Hampshire(including Portsmouth and Southampton) is less than 2 million! What is this M27 corridor?
SOMETHING'S GOTTA GIVE
The census figures would dispute your figures
This video is nonsense. All wrong. Waste of time. Take it down and do it again properly.
How did the village of Manchester suddenly jump from sixth largest to seco nd,me thinks someone wants to go back to school😂
With a population of almost 600K, Manchester is hardly a village. Also the Greater Manchester area, with a population of almost 2.8 million inhabitants, is the second most densely populated area in the UK, after Greater London. It overtook the West Midlands some time ago as regards inhabitants per square mile, it now has overtaken it as regards total population.
My immediate thought when starting to watch this this was City != Metropolitan area.
My second thought was this is from the people who try to make out that Manchester is bigger than Birmingham and Leeds. I was not disappointed.
Mancunians: you keep the _city_ of Salford out of your hegemonic claims and Brum will not claim West Bromwich, Worcester, Bromsgrove, Lichfield, Coventry, Warwick, Rugby . . .
It would be great to have all these areas classed in the West Midlands officially as it would make Birmingham/ West Midlands as big as London. Under new arrangements most of these areas are working with the Greater Birmingham Chamber of Commerce and are gaining from it
Manchester is slightly bigger than Birmingham ! Leeds council boundaries are exagerated covering countryside villages!
@@Glasgowurbanwildlife Do _you_ include the City of Salford in the City of Manchester? Manchester has a population of about 500k, Birmingham twice that.
@@Glasgowurbanwildlife So where did you get that fact from, I think you are mistakenly thinking of Greater Manchester which my friend is not the City of Manchester only joined by the word Manchester, you see they are two different identities, Greater Manchester is the name of the Metropolitan County Council that was set up in 1974 taking over South East Lancashire and North East Cheshire which was such a long drawn out name the powers to be named it Greater Manchester containing a lot of separate towns and Cities in the area such as Greater Birmingham, oh sorry the West Midlands Metropolitan Council did. But you are comparing the size of a Metropolitan County, Greater Manchester with the size of a City, the City of Birmingham, but I am sorry to disappoint you try looking it up, The City of Birmingham ( not the West Midlands) dwarf the City of Manchester ( not Greater Manchester ) in that the City of Birmingham's boundaries are 150 sq miles in area and a population of 1.5 Million plus in the City alone not counting the West Midlands and the size of The City of Manchester ( Not Greater Manchester County Council) is only 58 Sq miles in area and the City of Manchester has only a population of around 560 to 580,000 Citizens even Bristol and Liverpool are officially bigger than the City of Manchester, so no the City of Manchester is not slightly larger than the City of Birmingham, in fact Birmingham dwarfs Manchester in size and population and that is why Birmingham is officially the Second City of the UK, do your research like I have first.
@frogandspanner your correct city of Manchester has just over 500k i think this video was giving figures for city urban areas
Southampton has an approx. population of about 250 to 300k. No idea where you get that figure from, but it's completely wrong.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_urban_areas_in_the_United_Kingdom
Scotland yeah !!!
Sorry don't know where you are getting your information from on this video but the City of Manchester has not got 2,770,000 citizens, it has only got 580,000 citizens and Birmingham has a population of 1.5 million citizens and that is the official UK Government statistics , this makes the City of Birmingham officially the Second Largest City in the UK as per the UK Government and the City of Manchester in 8th position.
In this video you are doing the stupid thing of comparing Metropolitan County Councils to Cities, Metropolitan County Councils are not Cities, they are local Government that just look after local transport, trade and other public services are not Cities, but do have towns and Cities with in there boundary and are equivalent to County Councils such as Warwickshire and Devon so this video is talking a load of Rubbish who ever made this video needs to do more research on this matter, Greater Manchester is NOT a CITY it is just a metropolitan county council, the size of Cities are measured on the actual city alone so this count can only be done comparing the City of Birmingham, Liverpool and Manchester to one another.
Omg. No wonder there are «wars» going on. Does it really matter how big the city is as long as it is a nice place to live? Google eg. Oslo Norway. It just passed 700000 ihb. but in reality it is over 1 million, and 1,8 mill. in the metro area.. Not that I care, but the list here was sooooo wrong :-)
I read somewhere that Oslo counted it´s metropolitan area in an almost 100km radius from the city centre. I guess the cities in the U.K have alot higher people density
@@Moja421 If that was the case a lot of the met. area would be in Sweden.. The city itself has just over 1 mill, and 700000 within its border..
Population doesn't matter much anyway. When I was a kid in the 70s, there was no doubt Birmingham was the second city and always in the news. Now...only someone from Birmingham would think that. Manchester has clearly outstripped Birmingham in importance. I live in London and Birmingham never comes up. I regard Manchester as the only serious rival.
@ae112 Well yes, Greater London is. Just as Greater Manchester is made up of 10 boroughs. Both are counties. Birmingham is not.
These are conurbations, covering more than city boundaries.
People from Birmingham say Birmingham is the second city....People from Manchester say London is!
Bristol is definitely not in Gloucestershire. It's a county in its own right.
London is a tiny city. Only the financial district (inside the old roman wall) is the city of london and population is tiny. I believe it is still the smallest city in the country as it is just smaller than wells - but i could be wrong on that last bit.
The City of London is the original city, city status was awarded so that the King's tolls could be enforced on the Thames. Greater London (the amalgam of the City, central London, Middlesex, some bits of Surrey and one or two other counties) is not the entire metro area, let alone the extended unbroken urban area of London which covers 13-14 million people.
@darthwiizius correct. As I said, the city of London is extremely small. The rest is greater London which only has county status where the rest of the boroughs do indeed make up a huge area and large population. But the only cities in London are London city and Westminster which has a bigger population that the city of London.
@@sx200n1
Greater London also holds city status in it's own right. London though is a complicated place to describe in usual terms because we tend to use the county area as the population instead of the total area. It's because it was constructed via sprawl until they adapted the Green Belt from Letchworth to restrict it which just transferred the sprawl to orbit towns like Reading, Watford, Hemel Hempstead, etc extending the unbroken area into large parts of the surrounding counties. If I were to define a simple border around London I'd probably use the equally inaccurate description of "everything inside the M25".
Yeah this video is rubbish Southampton bigger than Bristol I don't think so.
Birmingham is Britain's second city as everyone knows. What a load of rubbish.
Birmingham has a much larger population then Manchester Manchesters population is only around 500k your including grater Manchester witch is towns in the surrounding areas like Oldham Rochdale Bolton and other places
This guy probably would say Wolverhampton is in birmingham
God bless UK 🙏
what about dublin
It's a UK survey.
No Dublin, I place I know well.
This is all cobblers. Where do you get these numbers from? My city, Sheffield, is bigger than Manchester, and so is Bradford, Leeds and Liverpool. Nice try
Hello Kevin, how are you doing today.
@@LisaScott-ip4hw I'm ok, thank you
You look very handsome ❤️
Thank you, tell that to my wife. We've been married 48 years in August.
@@KevinStones WOW 😯 that very good where are you from?
I'm from Southampton. And unless the surrounding Cities of Southampton are included in the population then this is wrong. It holds roughly 1/4 of a million people is definitely not bigger than Bristol, Liverpool or Sheffield. Their like twice the size at least!
A lot of people are offended by this video, get the numbers right before posting such utter lies.
Glasgow has had boundaries on it down through the years scottish government should scrap the boundaries and make glasgow what it once was,way a population over a million people in the city.
Most of these are wrong looool was expecting you to place Wakefield at number 1
Hello Simon, how are you doing today.
@Lisa Scott not good I live in sheffield and sheffield city council are some of the biggest scumbags going
I was expecting st David’s at number one
These are the populations of the Metropolitan Areas, not the cities. Manchester must have recently overtaken Birmingham as the second largest conurbation, they were neck and neck in the last figures I saw. However, the City of Birmingham is much bigger than the City of Manchester, 1.1 million as opposed to 600K. Greater Manchester remains the most densely populated area outside of London as the West Midlands conurbation covers a greater area than Greater Manchester, so even when it had a larger population then Greater Manchester, it was less densely populated per square mile.
1.6 million for Glasgow? Greater Glasgow maybe if you’re counting Lanarkshire Dunbartonshire Renfrewshire and parts of Ayrshire
Kingdom of Thailand
Miss Uaiporn. Phetdi & Visas Passport. kingdom of Thailand
น.ส. อวยพร เพชรดี ชื่อเล่น นก (Nog )
Unfortunately most of the data is incorrect
often peaple use greater manchester as manchester on any acount birmungham is biger than manchester
Southampton much smaller than that - they've lumped in the population of Portsmouth and the whole of South Hampshire, which is hilarious. Portsmouth and Southampton 2 separate towns about 20 miles apart
Many of these cities are no longer in their parent counties: they are their own unitary authorites, i.e., counties of their own. For example, Leicester is no longer in Leicestershire. Surrounded by it it, yes, but no longer in it.
Likes Uk....
just checked manchester pop in 2022 569.000
The populations of all these cities seem grossly inflated. Probably including surrounding towns and cities within commuting distance, which really distorts the situation. Southampton's position in the list order is a joke. So, to a lesser extent, is Brighton's. And there's no way that Manchester is bigger than Birmingham.
Not sure were these figures originated. There is not really a reliable way of gauging the size of these agglomerations. The largest basic building block for this is the English regions and added to them Scotland, Wales and N. Ireland. These regions are not helpful in ascertaining city populations. The next area size are parliamentary constituencies which are of approximately 75000 people each. These areas are what are generally used to give a guide to the population of cities. These districts are also not very useful in determining city populations ie using this method puts Leeds as bigger than Manchester. The reason for this is that the constituencies also form a template for local governments representation.The real truth is that knowing the nominal population of a given named city is of no real use to geographers, were as having voting areas of similar size is.
Load of shite it's counting people in other areas not associated with cities
Vương quốc Liên hiệp Anh và Bắc Ireland (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)
Diện tích 242.500 km²
Dân số 66.980.000🧍(2021)
Được hợp nhất từ 4 Quốc gia
1. England 🏴
Diện tích 130.278 km²
Dân số 56.490.048🧍
2. Scotland 🏴
Diện tích 77.925 km²
Dân số 5.479.900🧍
3. Northern Ireland 🇮🇪
Diện tích 13.562 km²
Dân số 1.903.175🧍
4. Wales 🏴
Diện tích 20.735 km²
Dân số 3.107.494🧍
Nước Anh gồm vùng địa lý chia thành 48 Hạt nghi lễ (Hạt địa lý)
Hạt ở Anh, số 'nghi lễ' truyền thống sẽ được sử dụng. Đó là 48 hạt riêng biệt tạo nên đất nước Anh.
9 Khu vùng địa lý của nước Anh 🏴 (England)
Diện tích 130.278 km²
Dân số 56.490.048🧍(thống kê dân số 2021)
1. Đông Bắc (North East)
Diện tích: 8.573 km²
Dân số 2.647.013🧍
2. Tây Bắc (North West)
Diện tích: 14.105 km²
Dân số 7.417.397🧍
3. Yorkshire and Humber
Diện tích:15.408 km²
Dân số 5.480.777🧍
4.Tây Midlands (West Midlands)
Diện tích: 13.000 km
Dân số 5.961.929🧍
5. Trung du phía đông (East Midlands)
Diện tích: 15.627 km²
Dân số 4.865.583🧍
6.Tây Nam Bộ (South West)
Diện tích: 23.800 km²
Dân số 5.659.143🧍
7. Đông Nam (South East)
Diện tích:19.070 km²
Dân số 9.278.065🧍
8. Phía đông (East)
Diện tịch 19.120 km²
Dân số 6.269.161🧍
9. Greater London
Diện tích: 1.569 km²
Dân số 8.799.728🧍
Danh sách các hạt của Anh 🏴 Các hạt nghi lễ của Anh
Bảng tất cả 48 hạt của Anh vào năm 2023, được gọi chính thức là "các hạt nghi lễ của Anh", như được định nghĩa trong Đạo luật về nghĩa vụ quân sự năm 1997, phân biệt chúng với các khu vực hành chính của chính quyền địa phương. Các hạt của nước Anh còn được gọi là "các hạt địa lý của Anh" vì chúng bao gồm các ranh giới và đặc điểm tự nhiên vĩnh viễn. “Các quận lịch sử của nước Anh” đã phát triển từ nước Anh bộ lạc thành các khu vực hành chính trong thời kỳ chiếm đóng của người La Mã và người Norman.
48 Hạt nghi lễ Nước Anh theo khu vực
1. Đông Bắc (North East) gồm có 3 hạt là
1 Durham
Diện tích 2.721 km²
Dân số 862.600
2 Northumberland
Diện tích 5.013 km²
Dân số 319.000
3 Tyne and Wear
Diện tích 540 km²
Dân số 1.129.500
2. Tây Bắc (North West) gồm có 5 hạt là
1 Cheshire
Diện tích 2.343 km²
Dân số 1.054.100
2 Cumbria
Diện tích 6.767 km²
Dân số 498.400
3 Greater Manchester
Diện tích 1.276 km²
Dân số 2.798.800
4 Lancashire
Diện tích 3.075 km²
Dân số 1.490.500
5 Merseyside
Diện tích 647 km²
Dân số 1.416.800
3 Yorkshire and Humber gồm có 4 hạt là
1 East Riding of Yorkshire
Diện tích 2.479 km²
Dân số 598.700
2 North Yorkshire
Diện tích 8.654 km²
Dân số 1.153.400
3 South Yorkshire
Diện tích 1.152 km²
Dân số 1.393.400
4 West Yorkshire
Diện tích 2.029 km²
Dân số 2.307.000
4. Tây Midlands (West Midlands) gồm có 6 hạt là
1 Herefordshire
Diện tích 2.180 km²
Dân số 191.000
2 Shropshire
Diện tích 3.488 km²
Dân số 493.200
3 Staffordshire
Diện tích 2.714 km²
Dân số 1.126.200
4 Warwickshire
Diện tích 1.975 km²
Dân số 564.600
5 West Midlands
Diện tích 902 km²
Dân số 2.897.300
6 Worcestershire
Diện tích 1.741 km²
Dân số, 588.400
5. Trung du phía đông (East Midlands) gồm có 6 hạt là
1 Derbyshire
Diện tích 2.625 km²
Dân số 1.049.000
2 Leicestershire
Diện tích 2.156 km²
Dân số 1.043.800
3 Lincolnshire
Diện tích 6.975 km²
Dân số 1.082.300
4 Northamptonshire
Diện tích 2.364 km²
Dân số 741.200
5 Nottinghamshire
Diện tích 2.159 km²
Dân số 1.147.100
6 Rutland
Diện tích 382 km²
Dân số 39.500
6. Tây Nam Bộ (South West) gồm có 7 hạt là
1 Bristol
Diện tích 110 km²
Dân số 463.405
2 Cornwall
Diện tích 3.546 km²
Dân số 565.968
3 Devon
Diện tích 6.707 km²
Dân số, 1.185.500
4 Dorset
Diện tích 2.653 km²
Dân số 770.700
5 Gloucestershire
Diện tích 3.150 km²
Dân số 907.200
6 Somerset
Diện tích 4.170 km²
Dân số 956.700
7 Wiltshire
Diện tích 3.485 km²
Dân số 716.400
7. Đông Nam (South East) gồm có 9 hạt là
1 Berkshire
Diện tích 1.262 km²
Dân số 905.800
2 Buckinghamshire
Diện tích 1.874 km²
Dân số 803.400
3 East Sussex
Diện tích 1.791 km²
Dân số 840.400
4 Hampshire
Diện tích 3.769 km²
Dân số 1.837.800
5 Isle of Wight
Diện tích 384 km²
Dân số 141.000
6 Kent
Diện tích 3.738 km²
Dân số 1.832.300
7 Oxfordshire
Diện tích 2.605 km²
Dân số 682.400
8 Surrey
Diện tích 1.663 km²
Dân số 1.185.300
9 West Sussex
Diện tích 1.991 km²
Dân số 852.400
8. Phía Đông (East) gồm có 6 hạt là
1 Bedfordshire
Diện tích 1.235 km²
Dân số 664.600
2 Cambridgeshire
Diện tích 3.390 km²
Dân số 847.200
3 Essex
Diện tích 3.670 km²
Dân số, 1.820.400
4 Hertfordshire
Diện tích 1.643 km²
Dân số 1.180.900
5 Norfolk
Diện tích 5.380 km²
Dân số, 898.400
6 Suffolk
Diện tích 3.801km²
Dân số 757.000
9. Greater London (Greater London)
Diện tích 1.569 km²
Dân số 8.817.300
1 City of London
Diện tích 2,9 km²
Dân số. 7.700
NEWCASTLE is nowhere near that size
Sunderland city boundary is greater than Newcastle.
Yes, about 300000 people in Newcastle Upon Tyne. This figure they are using is Tyneside(though not Wearside) It must include, Gateshead, North Tyneside and South Tyneside as well.(though not Sunderland)
It shouldn't be called "cities",what is traditionally in UK understood as something inside city borders. Even though it can be strange, inadequate, like City of London.
In this case you showed (mostly informal) metropolitan areas, what makes more sense.
i
I've used urban areas to count the different populations, but I put in the titles cities to make it easier to understand.
Inaccurate video. The headline is cities but uses metropolitan districts. Another RUclips con.
This video should be renamed Top 15 Conurbations in the UK by Population. Even then it wouldn't be entirely accurate.
Bristol is a city and county it’s not in south Gloucestershire
No way Glasgow has that population, it’s about 800k
This video is totally inaccurate. No way London is the biggest UK city.
What a load of utter crap
How do you define a Large City.Would you define the Scottish Highlands as a Large City.In my eyes,it is the
Largest City in the UK.