His powermeters cooked he’s obviously not doing 7w/kg for 20 minutes, literally just think about it for a second, 7w/kg is as good or better of a performance then anything vineggard or pogacar has ever done, I kind of doubt he’d be struggling to win 2.pro races if those numbers were true
vine back in 21 must have weighed about 70 (vuelta 22 said he was 67). He did 6.5+ If you factor in the half minute difference and the fact that lighter riders need more w/kg to go the same speed then 6.8-6.9 is very reasonable for Double.
@@CharlieCarbsandCycling You can estimate the w/kg of the rider using the VAM and gradient without knowing the riders weight. VAM/gradient factor/100 = VAMw/kg VAM = 1730 gradient factor = 2 + (gradient/10) = 2 + (7.3/10) = 2.73 1730/2.73/100 = 6.34 VAMw/kg 6.34 w/kg seems more reasonable than 7w/kg
@@PhaseBlur but what about wind ? Or rolling resistance or any of those . Also you honestly reckon to get one of the hardest koms in girona you need 6.3 for 20
@@CharlieCarbsandCycling Yes according to the VAM and avg. gradient provided the KOM for that segment is currently 6.34 VAMw/kg. According to Coggan World Tour riders are 6.1-6.6 w/kg for 20mins. Contadors climb on Verbier back in the 2009 tour, which raised eyebrows, was 6.78 VAMw/kg (assuming a VAM of 1864 at 7.5%).
dare i say: "OUTRAGEOUS"
Honestly bjergs 480 for 20 was more impressive to me
yh it's bigggg
His powermeters cooked he’s obviously not doing 7w/kg for 20 minutes, literally just think about it for a second, 7w/kg is as good or better of a performance then anything vineggard or pogacar has ever done, I kind of doubt he’d be struggling to win 2.pro races if those numbers were true
Probably 9200 Powermeter reading the usual 20 Watts high.
377 seems a little more resonable at 6.5 W/kg
@@rmpelnilschen130then how did he get the KOM?
@@coolkid8608 6.5 W/kg should still be enough to move
@@rmpelnilschen130 He's on sram and it all ads up
vine back in 21 must have weighed about 70 (vuelta 22 said he was 67). He did 6.5+ If you factor in the half minute difference and the fact that lighter riders need more w/kg to go the same speed then 6.8-6.9 is very reasonable for Double.
1730 vam with 7w/kg on 7,3% doesn’t add up
7% isn’t that steep and it’s not an even gradient so it checks out.
what makes you say this?
@@CharlieCarbsandCycling You can estimate the w/kg of the rider using the VAM and gradient without knowing the riders weight.
VAM/gradient factor/100 = VAMw/kg
VAM = 1730
gradient factor = 2 + (gradient/10) = 2 + (7.3/10) = 2.73
1730/2.73/100 = 6.34 VAMw/kg
6.34 w/kg seems more reasonable than 7w/kg
@@PhaseBlur but what about wind ? Or rolling resistance or any of those . Also you honestly reckon to get one of the hardest koms in girona you need 6.3 for 20
@@CharlieCarbsandCycling Yes according to the VAM and avg. gradient provided the KOM for that segment is currently 6.34 VAMw/kg. According to Coggan World Tour riders are 6.1-6.6 w/kg for 20mins. Contadors climb on Verbier back in the 2009 tour, which raised eyebrows, was 6.78 VAMw/kg (assuming a VAM of 1864 at 7.5%).
Whats vam
Vertical meters ascent per hour