Amazing how a city encompassed by both modern Israel and ancient Israel has apparently never been a part of either nor has it ever had a Judean or Israelite populace, according to this video. I wonder if the Bible mentions the city at all.
Excellent visuals and I applaud you presenting the Palestinian perspective first and foremost but to make not a single mention of the major historical Israelite presence at Shechem does a disservice to your audience who are thus getting only a limited education.
Shikmu = Shechem =Zichem maar waarom de naam steeds veranderd en verdraait wordt?,vraag mij niet ik weet het niet.. Zo wordt historie steeds verdraait en zullen nooit weten waar we exact vandaan komen! Diaspora? Exodus? of hoe je het wil noemen!..leef jij hier dan ben je van hier, leef jij daar dan ben jij van daar!
@@Gehenna71 wow I got a highlighted reply from you, and I love you already Because in this being of existence it's the ''love that conquers all'' that is the true conquering one Haha, I'm really realious (that shall be a new word creation of ''real & serious'') Haha we going to travel quite a distance on this rock called earth
no the bible has some true things in it , but just like spiderman gets New York right the fact the bible has some truth in it does not mean it is all true . For each claim we need independent evidence .
@@karfomachet7265 Regardless of religious affiliation, one will be hard pressed, to find any archeological claims, that the bible is wrong on locations, and or existence of cities, mentioned in the bible. Amazingly...time and time again...archeology, proves the bible right concerning locations and the existence of ancient cities. The secular world denied the existence of such cities, Ninevah...Babylon...Ur...etc...only for modern archeology, in modern times...to prove the bible correct. That is just fact...regardless of ones religious beliefs.
@@baberoot1998 nazereth is one place the bible gets wrong - archeololgy has found no evidence of this town existing before christians settled there in the 4th century after Helena had declared a cave shown to her by locals as a part of nazereth . The only thing they found was pagan roman graves and no Jewish town would ever be built near pagan graves .No doubt that the christian holy sites in Jerusalem are all so likely bogus the church of the holy sepulchre was simply chosen because it was the site of the temple of venus .
@@karfomachet7265 Agreed. Helena, in the 4th century...rode to Jerusalem and other supposed biblical locations and declared them holy sites. That is her interpretation. The bible doesn't claim the so called Holy Sepulchre is the real place where Christ was crucified. Just as she also chose Mt Sinai in the Sinai Peninsula as the mountain Moses was at. The bible doesn't make these claims. Helena did. Know the difference between what Helena says...and what the bible says...and you will do far better with your argument.
@@karfomachet7265 Besides...your faint attempt at Nazareth being bogus...(and it is very faint), does not exclude all the other solid evidence of archeological facts that corroborate the bible. If you are going to scour the bible...and find one possible obscure possiblity within the realm of 'maybe'...then you are just not going to be honest with yourself at all. You are the type....that will search endlessly...to find one little possible discrepancy...after all the other obvious evidence...and point to one obscure possibility that the bible 'may' be wrong...and then triumphantly point a finger and say...'See! See!' That is just not being honest with yourself. Quote frankly...it is asinine.
Typical, "historical sources"..... avoiding to mention bible and the hebrews. God loves His people Israel and in every archeological dig you will find them.
And what group did the samaritans leave to form there new religion ? O the Jewish religion , typical arabs want to deny Jewish heritage . We now know that the ancient canaanites transformed into the Israelites who did not enter from outside but were all ways here .
We need more lightning on levantine archeology like this, thanks !
finally a clip with a true virtual reconstruction about an ancient biblical city!
Amazing how a city encompassed by both modern Israel and ancient Israel has apparently never been a part of either nor has it ever had a Judean or Israelite populace, according to this video. I wonder if the Bible mentions the city at all.
ST-Sychem wydarzenia
Troja wydarzenia
Trying in every way to avoid mentioning the city in relation to the nation of Israel.
how can anybody from few rocks can suppose the whole thing looked like a city? c'mon
it's called archeology.
its the foundation left behind
Lol you ignant
Excellent visuals and I applaud you presenting the Palestinian perspective first and foremost but to make not a single mention of the major historical Israelite presence at Shechem does a disservice to your audience who are thus getting only a limited education.
Egypt in all its empire was brutal, I don't pity them now or them.
Shikmu = Shechem =Zichem maar waarom de naam steeds veranderd en verdraait wordt?,vraag mij niet ik weet het niet..
Zo wordt historie steeds verdraait en zullen nooit weten waar we exact vandaan komen! Diaspora? Exodus? of hoe je het wil noemen!..leef jij hier dan ben je van hier, leef jij daar dan ben jij van daar!
Zichem = Sichne
@@Gehenna71 wow I got a highlighted reply from you, and I love you already
Because in this being of existence it's the ''love that conquers all'' that is the true conquering one
Haha, I'm really realious (that shall be a new word creation of ''real & serious'')
Haha we going to travel quite a distance on this rock called earth
But the lands West of Mesopotamia on the outskirts of the Levant
Shalam liku Yarki Shikamu . Shalamu Shalami Shalam
We True Canaanites stand forever. Praise be Baal Most High.
Exotic - Truth - Seeker - Artist you serious?
@@emptyvessel7 yes i am
@@emptyvessel7 Yes Yes Yes
@@emptyvessel7 Why you ask ?
Exotic - Truth - Seeker - Artist i don’t mean to impose, but who are you referring to when you say Baal?
Blessed Shikam, Palestine/Canaan.
Bible is true and our very true
no the bible has some true things in it , but just like spiderman gets New York right the fact the bible has some truth in it does not mean it is all true . For each claim we need independent evidence .
@@karfomachet7265 Regardless of religious affiliation, one will be hard pressed, to find any archeological claims, that the bible is wrong on locations, and or existence of cities, mentioned in the bible. Amazingly...time and time again...archeology, proves the bible right concerning locations and the existence of ancient cities. The secular world denied the existence of such cities, Ninevah...Babylon...Ur...etc...only for modern archeology, in modern times...to prove the bible correct. That is just fact...regardless of ones religious beliefs.
@@baberoot1998 nazereth is one place the bible gets wrong - archeololgy has found no evidence of this town existing before christians settled there in the 4th century after Helena had declared a cave shown to her by locals as a part of nazereth . The only thing they found was pagan roman graves and no Jewish town would ever be built near pagan graves .No doubt that the christian holy sites in Jerusalem are all so likely bogus the church of the holy sepulchre was simply chosen because it was the site of the temple of venus .
@@karfomachet7265 Agreed. Helena, in the 4th century...rode to Jerusalem and other supposed biblical locations and declared them holy sites. That is her interpretation. The bible doesn't claim the so called Holy Sepulchre is the real place where Christ was crucified. Just as she also chose Mt Sinai in the Sinai Peninsula as the mountain Moses was at. The bible doesn't make these claims. Helena did. Know the difference between what Helena says...and what the bible says...and you will do far better with your argument.
@@karfomachet7265 Besides...your faint attempt at Nazareth being bogus...(and it is very faint), does not exclude all the other solid evidence of archeological facts that corroborate the bible. If you are going to scour the bible...and find one possible obscure possiblity within the realm of 'maybe'...then you are just not going to be honest with yourself at all. You are the type....that will search endlessly...to find one little possible discrepancy...after all the other obvious evidence...and point to one obscure possibility that the bible 'may' be wrong...and then triumphantly point a finger and say...'See! See!' That is just not being honest with yourself. Quote frankly...it is asinine.
Shečhem Nablus Tel Balata
Shikam
Shikamu
Shikami
Shikama
Typical, "historical sources"..... avoiding to mention bible and the hebrews. God loves His people Israel and in every archeological dig you will find them.
And what group did the samaritans leave to form there new religion ? O the Jewish religion , typical arabs want to deny Jewish heritage . We now know that the ancient canaanites transformed into the Israelites who did not enter from outside but were all ways here .
Israel, not Palestine.
Israelites, not Samaritans.
Not Palistein its Israel.