Sony HDR-CX405: XAVC S vs. AVCHD | Test Footage

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 окт 2024

Комментарии • 30

  • @EphraimKunorishi
    @EphraimKunorishi 8 лет назад +9

    Nice. It will be good if u can compare the two format indoors with low light situation. Want to see how much lesser noise XAVCS helps.

  • @turitamasnyirbator
    @turitamasnyirbator 6 лет назад +2

    What a pity RUclips always convert the videos regardless of the original bitrate so you won't be able to demonstrate the real picture of a camera.

  • @ZZ9ProductionsOFFICIAL
    @ZZ9ProductionsOFFICIAL 6 лет назад +3

    Can you do a low light comparison of the two please?

  • @leehaze1
    @leehaze1 7 лет назад +2

    It would be nice to know what your edited output vid was, codec and mbps. Some low light stuff shots would have been nice as well. thanks for the vid.

  • @jenovacore6329
    @jenovacore6329 7 лет назад +4

    I may be late, but I notice your camera has like.. no grain at all. I bought a CX405 today myself to start out in video editing and vlogging, but there is a noticeable amount of grain that kind of reduces the quality a bit. Does XAVC-S fix this or is it a setting that I'm missing? Thanks!

  • @MegaBigBright
    @MegaBigBright 8 лет назад +2

    XAVC s - 422 ! This is the main difference.

  • @tomil2002
    @tomil2002 6 лет назад +2

    Avchd will give 9/10 points and xavc with ladies 9.5 / 10 points.But Sony can not make a little light.Panasonic is better in low light.The Sony HDR-CX405 is an exquisite camera for the exterier.Control is not very good.

  • @SteveHDCh
    @SteveHDCh 8 лет назад +1

    YOU THINK THAT THE BEST IS XAVCS OR AVCHD?

  • @CDsBrickMix
    @CDsBrickMix 8 лет назад +1

    I really can't see a difference. Only maby with the water, the XAVC S looks slightly better.

  • @Syka040388
    @Syka040388 8 лет назад +3

    интересно как вы сравниваете два кодека!? у вас что экран одновременно воспроизводит две разные картинки с двумя разными кодеками!? ,))))))) или у вас обе картинки были сделаны в одном редакторе а потом пожаты на 15мб кодеком MP4!? и вы реально видите разницу на этом видео!? ,)))))))

    • @turitamasnyirbator
      @turitamasnyirbator 6 лет назад

      Если вы сделаете видео с самым высоким битрейтом, вы, вероятно, сможете продемонстрировать разницу. Конечно, рендеринг видео не составляет 15 Мбит / с MP4, а что-то другое.
      И когда видео загружается, RUclips будет конвертировать и разрушать битрейт. Вот почему капли воды настолько невелики.
      (Пожалуйста, простите меня за Переводчик Google!)

    • @Всячина
      @Всячина 6 лет назад +1

      Похоже, автор решил показать, что нет смысла снимать с высоким битрейтом, если в итоге всё-равно всё пережимается.

    • @Viponline54
      @Viponline54 6 лет назад

      лично я не увидел отличий

  • @felipesanches_guitar
    @felipesanches_guitar 6 лет назад +1

    Hi, this camera has the option to recorded at 30fps, 24fps, etc ... Or only at 60fps? I bought this camera, but I did not find the option 30fps, 24fps, only 60p or 60i.

  • @vincetarrosa
    @vincetarrosa 8 лет назад +4

    Thanks a lot for the vid! My lousy eyes can't detect much of a difference.
    By the way, can you turn on Optical stabilization in any video mode?

    • @virtualsparks8405
      @virtualsparks8405  8 лет назад

      +Vince Patrick Tarrosa You are welcome! Regarding the optical stabilization, yes you can turn it on in any video mode, and it works pretty well. I actually have another video where you see it in action while chasing a helicopter.

    • @vincetarrosa
      @vincetarrosa 8 лет назад

      +Virtual Sparks Alright, I'll go take a look.
      By the way, I have a question regarding AVCHD: do they result in .MTS files? If so, do you have any problems importing them into your editing software?

    • @virtualsparks8405
      @virtualsparks8405  8 лет назад +2

      +Vince Patrick Tarrosa You should have no problem in editing AVCHD files. However, if you decide to go with the Sony camcorder, I would suggest using XAVC S instead, which is regarded by many as a better codec. It also produces separate .MP4 files, which are are much easier to import and edit IMHO.

  • @AcasaInNatura
    @AcasaInNatura 6 лет назад

    Should I see a difference?? Because I don't. Surely xavc s it's just big marketing... just like Clear Audio, Extra Bass... Sony is good at marketing.

  • @FansPlay
    @FansPlay 8 лет назад

    Скажите, какие флэш-карты необходимо XAVC S? Видео выглядит так же,
    Tell me what kind of flash card is necessary for XAVC S?
    Video looks the same

    • @virtualsparks8405
      @virtualsparks8405  8 лет назад

      +fansplay For XAVC S I recommend using a Class 10 UHS-I, U3 card. I am currently using a PNY 64GB High Speed MicroSDXC card rated up to 90MB/sec, and it works great. I also tried other, slower cards, without success.

  • @hooho491
    @hooho491 7 лет назад

    what is mbps and which one is better?

  • @yogiadityapratomo1825
    @yogiadityapratomo1825 7 лет назад

    how do you record 60 fps? i cant see 60 fps on my sony . i only have 50 fps , can you help me ? and i cant record mode xavc

    • @claudia87rc
      @claudia87rc 6 лет назад

      it's just a different model. 240 and 405. NTSC and PAL. For different markets. It sounds like you own a PAL

  • @MrFalliorsLife
    @MrFalliorsLife 8 лет назад

    XAVC looks noticeably worse in your videos. Why?

    • @virtualsparks8405
      @virtualsparks8405  8 лет назад

      +MrFalliorsLife Hi. At 1080p they look almost identical to me but it's definitely possible that some artifacts might have been introduced by the compression algorithm on RUclips.

    • @MrFalliorsLife
      @MrFalliorsLife 8 лет назад

      Virtual Sparks What I mean is your AVCHD side looks slightly clearer and a tad bit brighter. For example if you pay attention to the ones that show the sky, you can see the slight difference in shade. Your video is the only one I've seen that have AVC and XAVC flipped in terms of quality.

  • @rightOrWrongMyContry
    @rightOrWrongMyContry 6 лет назад

    Can't really see the difference.

  • @XtaticVideo
    @XtaticVideo 8 лет назад

    the same

    • @BisayaAn2neX
      @BisayaAn2neX 6 лет назад

      you need glasses and watch clearly coz i can see the difference... watch 0:50 clearly