Pulsar Axion XQ30 PRO versus XG30 COMPACT... to show you the 5 differences you'll notice

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 9

  • @mbj__
    @mbj__ 5 дней назад +2

    Good and informative

  • @Hermod_Hermit
    @Hermod_Hermit 25 дней назад +1

    This was extremely helpful. Thank you!

    • @TJ-Focus
      @TJ-Focus  24 дня назад +1

      You are most welcome - our aim is to help people choose the right model and get the most from it. You might like the Axion MEGA tests on our other channel:
      ruclips.net/video/pkz7UTJ9oK0/видео.htmlsi=RNtcgpX2lPVWDtSb

  • @jimwood
    @jimwood Месяц назад +1

    Nice review that Dave and I must admit I was surprised to see the XQ performing better in the rain so definitely a plus point for the cheaper model.

    • @TJ-Focus
      @TJ-Focus  Месяц назад +2

      Cheers - A case of buy the best tool for the job. And if you're inclined to be out a lot in ALL weathers, then the cheaper XQ PRO could be the one!

    • @jimwood
      @jimwood Месяц назад +1

      @TJ-Focus Absolutely. Sometimes the cheaper option is more beneficial depending on your needs.

  • @jeanmarccierniewski837
    @jeanmarccierniewski837 9 дней назад

    Hello.
    Very Nice review but sur to my bad English i wasn’t able to understand witch model is the best for general purpose.

    • @TJ-Focus
      @TJ-Focus  8 дней назад +1

      It really does depend on what you mean by 'general purpose.'
      If most of your spotting is below 150m the XQ30 will be enough for you. If you routinely want to spot beyond that, or you're looking for smaller animals, or you're scanning larger areas it would be worth spending more on the XG30.
      I've made this buyers guide that will help you decide: ruclips.net/video/cA1IbOg3FCY/видео.htmlsi=fhsE9EhRyQfsgJKW

    • @jeanmarccierniewski837
      @jeanmarccierniewski837 8 дней назад +2

      @@TJ-Focus Thank you :)🙂