Terima kasih Dr. Penerangan dan penyampaian Dr sangat jelas. Saya harap Dr boleh share banyak lagi video berkenaan dengan validity dan realibility. Sangat berminat untuk belajar lagi. Semoga Dr terus berjaya !
Assalam Dr, jika terdapat beberapa konstruk (A,,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) dalam instrumen kesahan yang dijalankan oleh pakar, adakah saya perlu buat I-CVI dan S-CVI untuk setiap konstruk? atau secara keseluruhan sahaja?
@@noormieyalias6862 Dr, boleh tak kalau CVI guna 5 likert scale? Lynn, suggested 3 or 5 scale may be considered but the best one is 4 because avoid hving neutral and midpoint. would u mind to share calculate cvi using 5 point likert scale?
hello, Good morning. Dr. May I know how I can argue with my supervisor to allow me to use this method compared to using any software? She does not support me to use this method, but with software, it's very difficult for me because I already get the data based on this method.
thank you, please I have a content validity template that was filled by experts, but the template includes (( simplicity, relevance, and clarity)) also necessity. what should I do for such situation????
I am pleased to have found your video. You have explained content validity very well (and just when I need it most). Many thanks!
This video is my life savior; very clear and details explanation!
Terima kasih Dr. Penerangan dan penyampaian Dr sangat jelas. Saya harap Dr boleh share banyak lagi video berkenaan dengan validity dan realibility. Sangat berminat untuk belajar lagi. Semoga Dr terus berjaya !
Thanks very much Dr
Im wondering, do we need to use both the S-CVI/Ave and S-CVI/UA, or just one of them? And what if one of them is below 0.8?
Terima kasih dr. Sangat jelas penerangan disaat sangat memerlukan. Semoga Allah mudahkan segala urusan Dr.
Excellent explanation. I have understood very well. Congratulations.
Thank You, you save my fyp
Salam Dr, if I combine 2 questionnaires (by 2 different authors) does it considered adapt, and do I need to do content validation?
Wassalam, yes, strongly recommended. and perhaps you may want to proceed with Exploratory Factor Analysis since you have combined 2 instruments.
Thank you so much, Dr. gorges :-)
Assalam Dr, jika terdapat beberapa konstruk (A,,B,C,D,E,F,G,H) dalam instrumen kesahan yang dijalankan oleh pakar, adakah saya perlu buat I-CVI dan S-CVI untuk setiap konstruk? atau secara keseluruhan sahaja?
Wslm, kena buat untuk setiap konstruk supaya ianya lebih spesifik mengikut konstruk
@@noormieyalias6862 Dr, boleh tak kalau CVI guna 5 likert scale? Lynn, suggested 3 or 5 scale may be considered but the best one is 4 because avoid hving neutral and midpoint. would u mind to share calculate cvi using 5 point likert scale?
hello, Good morning. Dr. May I know how I can argue with my supervisor to allow me to use this method compared to using any software? She does not support me to use this method, but with software, it's very difficult for me because I already get the data based on this method.
Dr kalau kt nk buang item tu, dalam report nnt better report setelah remove item ke or just report based on SCVI- Average saya 0.99
Assalamualaikum Dr. sgt jelas ilmu yg dr sampaikan. sy nak tnya, boleh ke cvi ni digunakan sebagai tools utk menilai keberkesanan modul oleh pakar?
thank you, please I have a content validity template that was filled by experts, but the template includes (( simplicity, relevance, and clarity)) also necessity. what should I do for such situation????
excuse me Doctor , i have a question . if i have a questionnaire with 2 sections , do i have to calculate CVI separately ? please answer me
Assalam Dr, sy guna 5 experts...SCVI- Average saya 0.99, jd macam mana ye Dr..
Excuse me doctor. Why there is a difference in the results between two methods?
Salam ..blh sy dapatkan nota slide ni
Which one of the results do I have to consider it as a content validity index?
The individual values as reference and the overall value for reporting purpose
May you assist me with the slides as well. Thank you