US MV-22 Pilot Negotiates Crazy Landing Approach on Aircraft Carrier at Sea

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 11 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 41

  • @avbriefs838
    @avbriefs838 Месяц назад

    Amazing footage

  • @jc.c7615
    @jc.c7615 Месяц назад

    Wow Amazon is everywhere

  • @OMG_LoL
    @OMG_LoL Месяц назад

    着艦用のアレスティングワイヤーは定期的に交換してますが、超高額だそうですね。

  • @davidharris2519
    @davidharris2519 Месяц назад +3

    you show a f-35 taking off but say a super hornet uses the catipult

  • @davidharris2519
    @davidharris2519 Месяц назад +2

    you said technicians on the character can perform but i think you meant to say carrier instead of character

  • @Fyg-rx8xh
    @Fyg-rx8xh Месяц назад +1

    🎉อยากเป็นทหารบ้างจังมันเท่และมั่นคงมาก...263...คนอ.หัวหินครับไทแลน

  • @gregknipe8772
    @gregknipe8772 Месяц назад

    you never got to the *Crazy Landing approach* ???? whaaaaa?

  • @thatguy7085
    @thatguy7085 Месяц назад

    The grape apes!

  • @davidharris2519
    @davidharris2519 Месяц назад +3

    the greyhound is much safer than the osprey and no DC-3 ever landed on a carrier

    • @ImpendingJoker
      @ImpendingJoker Месяц назад +1

      Greyhound can't carry as much and it is aging and not safer than the Osprey. There have been no crashes of the CMV-22 to date.

    • @davidharris2519
      @davidharris2519 Месяц назад +1

      @@ImpendingJoker plenty of Osprey crashes and i believe than the Greyhound is much safer than the Osprey

    • @therobloxroleplayguy
      @therobloxroleplayguy Месяц назад

      @@ImpendingJoker Clearly bro ain’t watch the news does bro really thinks the osprey has never crashed

    • @pahtar7189
      @pahtar7189 Месяц назад

      @@davidharris2519: There have been seven fatality accidents of the C-2 Greyhound, resulting in 55 deaths.

    • @pahtar7189
      @pahtar7189 Месяц назад

      There have been no fatal accidents of Air Force or Navy Ospreys.

  • @BaronVonOrvil
    @BaronVonOrvil Месяц назад

    The Greyhound had more range and more payload… the CV 22 isn’t efficient for this mission and cost of operation is 4 times plus that of the Greyhound

  • @HASANAlfaiz-yi6rn
    @HASANAlfaiz-yi6rn Месяц назад

    SAYA PERNAH JADI AGOTA MILITER KAPAL ANGKAT LAUT KARNA 1 👀 ROKOK ME ROKOK DI PECAT DI ATAS KAPAL

  • @pintu.pati.733
    @pintu.pati.733 Месяц назад

    🩴

  • @tomalexander9340
    @tomalexander9340 Месяц назад +2

    I can only imagine what a hellish environment it is to be deployed on a ship with females. So lucky I went haze grey and underway before that crap started.

  • @wayneyd2
    @wayneyd2 Месяц назад +2

    Sadly the MV-22 CAN"T do the job the C-2. It can not do the job. Not the range or the payloads.

    • @verdebusterAP
      @verdebusterAP Месяц назад +4

      Incorrect
      The CMV-22 retains the V-22s ability for aerial refueling but most importantly, the CMV-22 can land on smaller ship eliminating the need break down supplies prior to transfer

    • @Nerval-kg9sm
      @Nerval-kg9sm Месяц назад

      I was going to say something similar. There are jet engines in the Navy's active inventory that are too long for the MV-22, but fit in a C-2.

    • @Nerval-kg9sm
      @Nerval-kg9sm Месяц назад

      @@verdebusterAP It's not about smaller ships; it's about ships with jets on them. Those use C-2s, which they want the Ospreys to replace. You've fundamentally misunderstood the issue.

    • @ImpendingJoker
      @ImpendingJoker Месяц назад +2

      @@Nerval-kg9sm This is not true at all. the C-2 can not carry the engine for the F-35C but the CMV-22 can in fact do so.

    • @verdebusterAP
      @verdebusterAP Месяц назад +1

      @@Nerval-kg9sm
      Wrong
      The mission of the Carrier onboard delivery (COD) is not simply supposing the carrier but the entire fleet
      Yes at one point , COD was simply limited to supporting to carrier but the USN has expanded that role beyond carriers
      Second, the C-2 payload is 10,000lbs while CMV-22 can carry up 20,000lbs or use its external hook for 15,000lbs
      As mentioned before, it can use aerial refueling
      It has both superior payload and range to the C-2

  • @tnmwheatley
    @tnmwheatley Месяц назад +1

    Beyond line of fight radios? Dude look what your typing. #1 it would be line of sight radions, # they are actually called over the horizon radios, more commonly referred to as SATELLITE RADIOS! Also MV-22 hace a throttle not a collective. Look on some other videos, before you type your ass on youtube. THINK BEFORE YOU TYPE. OR ATLEASE DO SOME research!

    • @TangoDelta8111
      @TangoDelta8111 Месяц назад

      Says the guy Not using spellcheck!😂

  • @Fyg-rx8xh
    @Fyg-rx8xh Месяц назад +1

    🎉อยากเป็นทหารบ้างจังมันเท่และมั่นคงมาก...263...คนอ.หัวหินครับไทแลน

  • @Fyg-rx8xh
    @Fyg-rx8xh Месяц назад

    🎉อยากเป็นทหารบ้างจังมันเท่และมั่นคงมาก...263...คนอ.หัวหินครับไทแลน