He even gave out the name and badge number of the officer when the officer refused. Crazy to me that the officer can illegally demand ID in this case while illegally refusing to give his name and badge number
@@mathwizard10 "I always have my ID on me." "I don't have my ID." Contradictory statements. While not a huge huge deal it is still something to avoid so that is why I think he shouldn't get the +
He supported, defended and preserved the Constitution of the United States, as he took an oath to do. I've reminded a few cops of that oath from time to time. I took the same oath, and it never expires.
WHY are SO many people just A-holes; uncooperative, immature, instigating A-hole$ behaving like petulant toddlers?!?!?! And there are throngs more morons applauding the behavior, absolutely astonishing 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
It is amazing how quickly these situations can be ended just by the officer knowing the law. Even if officers are annoyed by auditors, and some of them are really annoying on purpose, if you follow they law they have nothing they can do.
Are you serious? That idiot is getting $118K a year for being a public nuisance with a badge? He should be fired. Kudos to the sergeant for quickly and accurately assessing the situation and de-escalating. We need more cops like Sergeant Ruiz.
"You're making this more difficult than it needs to be." And there it is! The presumptuous; I have every right because I have the badge and gun and you're just the inferior small guy that's supposed to bow to my will attitude. It's sickening.
Based on the supervisor's response, I get the feeling the officer is the department fok-up, a "Special" guy who keeps a short hair cut so he doesn't injure himself with his comb.
To me, this is one of the critical factors in judging the officers ability to conduct himself in a proper manner while carrying out his duties. To opening challenge a superior like that is proof that he he has difficulty even controlling himself.
The one thing I have trouble understanding, lieutenants, captains, sergeants, corporals. But not following orders is very worrisome, telling your sergeant that he is wrong is not going to help this idiots career.
Dude literally said his superior was wrong when he HIMSELF was 100% incorrect. That is a special kind of entitlement, cockyness, and disrespect. Officer M is dangerous. He needs to get fired. This is just the beginning of him being a tyrant.
Yea the fact he would not give his name and badge number after he was found wrong just shows a really bad ego problem that will eventually get him in trouble. The only good thing was he did not get to the point of acrually arresting him. Some cops would have by this point. But I do not understand why these cops are not trained better at this.
There's another video where that same cop arrested an auditor when the auditor was acting like douchebag and the sarge gave him the ok to arrest the auditor. He grabbed the auditor twisted his arm high behind his back and dumped him on the ground. Yup, that cop is a bad cop.
NJ cops itch at any opportunity to ticket citizens. They’re the kinda cops that hide in bushes waiting for people to drive 5 mph over the speed limit. They also love young drivers if you live near urban communities. Cops will create any story to pull over kids thinking they have drugs. Especially if your a white kid in predominately black community.
I love this!! "That's actually incorrect in that respect." "I'm clear, you're clear, is he clear?" "So now your Sergeant is wrong?" Man, that cop is on a serious power trip that even when his Sergeant says there's no criminal offense, the cops says that actually not correct. I love the way the Sergeant came up, asked a question, got the answer and totally diffused the situation.
@@xdavidliu sadly that a common flaw of human ego, not cop ego. argue with anyone on anything, and 3/10 people will never give up their side no matter how wrong they are. it just gets more dangerous with humans in positions of authority, especially when they're trained by mercenary companies pretending to be police training companies who use urban combat tactics like shock and awe, intimidation, domination of the scene and subjects, and forced compliance. horribly approach to instruction by the evil corportations selected by our political leaders is 50% of the problem. sets up the whole stage, perspective, and rapport into an adversarial and hostile situation from the get go. innately dysfunctional and immoral.
One important lesson I’m learning from these videos is to learn much more about the amendment’s rights and my state’s laws. Thank you to this and other similar channels for educating us!
A cop’s favorite line when doing something he shouldn’t is “you’re making this harder than it needs to be.” Yes I am. I’m making it harder for you to abuse your power. Cry about it tyrant
@@drewmesiano7602 How about the officer do his job correctly and not insist on violating people's rights. "Thank you for answering my questions. Be sure to stay on the sidewalk and mind the signs that limit access to certain parts of the property." Both go on their way in this scenario too and no cops needlessly violate any citizen's right to privacy.
@@drewmesiano7602 What perp? If cops treat everyone as criminals, we lose our rights. He was taking pictures, legally. And answered all questions, respectfully. Officers to not have a right to identify every single person they ever encounter, simply to 'have the encounter on record'. If the officer did his job legally and correctly, this encounter would have been smooth and quick. HE is responsible for the extended encounter NOT the citizen just going about his business, doing nothing wrong.
Especially in leadership positions. That's how you really make positive incremental change, because they will train officers to conduct themselves professionally, then they will then become leaders and the cycle continues.
@@warriorgp4640 it's going to be said as many times as law enforcement agencies pull this shit and refuse to hold their own accountable. Sorry it's so annoying
@@warriorgp4640 Very often cliches have a basis in reality. In this case, the Police Chief stated the matter was being investigated. Yet it's unclear what, if any, disciplinary action was taken in response to this incident. It's possible that the Police Chief came down hard on this officer, but it's also very possible there was little or even no action taken against the officer. Because how does that cliche go again?
@@__sm1441 It is annoying. But you know what’s more annoying? Not being able to trust our folks in blue because some of em do shit like this and NEVER held responsible.
@@warriorgp4640 sounds as though, you have an issue with the actual law..hopefully you are not a member of law enforcement, and if you are, learn the law, and follow it..That's what you are paid to do...
Gotta give the SGT. an A+. He didn’t need to discuss with his officer how to try to make a legal arrest, just listened to what was going on and did the right and legal thing. He should also get props for giving up the officers info as well as his own.
@@BeefyTime1 He wasn't being a dick, he was trying to keep the situation from escalating further. Providing further information to the citizen so that he knew to avoid certain areas and not give the 1st officer grounds to actually arrest or detain him.
@@rogerm3708 I would generally agree but not this time. There were times I've tried to put someone out of uniform that was my subordinate, but couldn't. Then when that person brings unwanted attention to the force my superiors would ask, what have you (me) done to train this person? My comment was always, "look in his/her review files, if I had my way he/she would have been gone a long time ago and we wouldn't be in this mess or having this discussion". It appears to me that this SGT stopped this just in time. Mr. State nearly became an injured, and possibly wealthy man. And I have a funny feeling that the SGTs superiors was not happy with the SGT. Especially given the way the chief swept it under the rug. The AtA said it perfectly about this cop. My opinion, he's a bully and gets a rush on his ability to hurt someone Knowing they won't defend themselves and are not allowed to defend themselves.
@Sean Pushor EXACTLY WHAT I THOUGHT. SUPERVISOR. Walked up, asked a simple question and CORRECTED his BOY, that he was wrong and to move on. The SUPERVISOR GETS AN A+
I’ve always been pro police for 52 years and the last two years I have no respect for law-enforcement anymore. Especially with cameras coming out especially my local Sheriffs Dept. They are absolutely horrible. I commend everybody that stands up for their rights. It’s the most important thing we have now in the United States and we’re losing them every day.
@@garbageparade5144 He only gave Ofc. Moschella the same level of respect he was given. You want to talk about arrogance. Ofc. Moschella wouldn't even acknowledge that Sgt. Ruiz was correct. You want to talk about petty. Ofc. Moschella tried making up BS to get this man's info and then was all pissy when challenged. Then at the end of all this he wouldn't even give his name (which is required). So it seems that Ofc. Moschella likes to enforce the law, threaten with the law, but not follow it. But the man behind the video is petty and arrogant, sure buddy.
@@rosavillavicencio7868 :God Bless the Sergeant, he is true to His Oath of Honor and shows Respect for the Private-Sector Citizens and Private-Sector Taxpayers, and Private-Sector Voters. We need more like him, that shows Respect for the Police "Oath of Honor"...
And what's more scary is that you can see in the first officers face he still thinks he is right and will continue to do the same exact thing to others that don't know their rights are being trampled, regardless of more training.
I know, it's crazy. I used to think they were all just lying when it comes to stuff like this, but the more you see it, you can tell they don't know. Really makes me wonder how many people get unjustly arrested and end up pleading guilty, either for a deal or just to get it over with.
Maybe more difficult than it _needs_ to be, but not more difficult than his rights permit him to make it. Cops need to understand that the constitution is first and foremost intended to be a collection of defensive rights to protect civilians and make law enforcement jobs harder _on purpose._
The look on that cop’s face at the end says everything. Absolutely infuriated and red-eyed with rage over the fact that he had to follow his oath, check his planet-sized ego and respect a citizen’s rights. The HORROR. That is the disconnect right there. Every citizen is just a statistic to them. They only care about themselves and their inflated pensions.
And this fool really said that the law had nothing to do with the law 🤦♀️ I wonder if he has any working brain cells left up there if it’s just got crayons stuck up there like Homer Simpsons.
The guy who filmed this is an instigator and a piece of crap human. All he is trying to do is rile up the police so he can become famous. He's only there to try and piss people off.
@@tonyrains217 yeah well, he was just filming where he's allowed to be. The officer has the option to not be instigated. You have nothing but tyranny to back up your perspective.
I appreciate your objectivity in content. I feel like I am being blasted by videos of officer misconduct, with mimimal coverage of those doing their jobs well. Thank you for providing coverage of officers staying true to their oath.
Anyone requiring adult supervision to conduct their job in a professional manner, especially when they are expected to understand and uphold the law while carrying a gun, is clearly unfit for that duty.
@@TRDiscordian I think his point was that, police officers should have a higher degree of professionalism and intelligence. They certainly should know the laws, if they are in a position to uphold said laws. So yeah, burger King employees need leaders, but in theory, police shouldn't, at least not as much that has been shown throughout time.
Supervisor deserves an A+ for calmly assessing the situation in a non bias manner and determining that the citizen was well within his rights and also stepping in to provide identification for both him and his officer
No he doesn't....he was arrogant and patronizing. He took 0 time to address the actual issue (his officer not knowing basic law and threatening a citizen with arrest) and was off-putting to Mr. State. Sure he told him he could video and take pictures but didn't do his job
I strongly suspect he knew it was a first amendment audit and was trying to get out of the situation without a lawsuit. Given his condescension and unwillingness to reprimand the officer I'm guessing this plays out differently if it isn't filmed.
*Assessing the situation* - 10:58 Supervisor should have first asked his officer for his reasonable suspicion, not question the detainee, and then end the detention promptly - supervisor extended an already illegal detention. *Provide Officers' Info* - likely a requirement, and later covering for the officer. C for the supervisor.
@@Djatrak03, do you think it is the supervisor's job to admonish the officer in public? He completely undercut the officer and embarrassed him thoroughly. By identifying hik when the officer refused to identify he finished him off.
But this Time it was on camera & he was corrected but his high EGOS still won’t let it go the failed to identify as a officer speak high volume about him
It's clear another clown harassing police officers trying to do their job. These clowns are not journalist. They need to stop claiming that they are and using that constitutional right. This video shows exactly how these clowns lie. Rather having to show it or not.
@@ralphtrynor9719 Journalists exist to show the rest of us the world as it really is. We are now truly seeing cops for the pigs they are. Making up lies to satisfy their egos. Too bad you got your nose stuck so far up their a**es.
@@ralphtrynor9719 "It's clear another clown harassing police officers trying to do their job. " Did the cop approach the auditor or the other way around ? Yeah that answer is obvious . Could you explain how it is a police officers job to violate citizens civil right because i thought their job was to enforce laws . "They need to stop claiming that they are and using that constitutional right." 1 st amendment rights apply to every citizen and legal alien not just to people employed by a corporate media outlet . The supreme court had to established this because it was questioned by egotistical authoritarians and stupid people . Which category do you fit under ? "This video shows exactly how these clowns lie. " Yes these 🤡 do lie and Mascara's superior confirmed it .
@@RobertSmith-lg7jp wasn't the cop responding to a call, right. (HIS JOB) or did he just go up to him for no reason. Or did auditor provoke the encounter. Now did the auditor go where he knew that he was going to encounter police officers. The answer is yes. We all know that they do. You're lying if you say they don't. So try again but with something with some common sense.
Cop: “You are making this more difficult than it needs to be.” Citizen: “Honoring your oath to NOT violate my Constitutional rights is NEVER a difficulty.”
Why wasn’t the Sergeant given a grade? He de-escalated the situation beautifully. He should be commended for handling the situation so professionally. A+ for the Sergeant.
Sergeant gets a C. He did a great job of de-escalation, but he should have reprimanded the officer in front of the victim. It doesn't require anything much, just "if you insist on illegally arresting this guy I'll be forced to arrest *you*."
118 thousand dollars a year is paid to an officer that has no concept the actual law that he was trying to arrest someone for? What other business or company would keep someone employed that has no idea how to do their job.
@@wintermoon5442 Unfortunately you're probably not wrong. I have a lot of cops in my family and they definitely take out their frustrations on their wives and kids 😔
I don't get why the officers don't know this and keep taking the bait and falling for it. You can look out the window and see that it's an auditor and just leave them alone. If they'd stop giving them reason, auditors wouldn't be necessary.
I want to know who is actually making all these suspicious persons calls into police departments every single time someone tries to film outside a station? I'm willing to bet either nobody called, or another officer called it in just to mess with the cameraman...
@@swooopg you could pour through all of the 911 calls for the hours prior to even being there and, in this case, would likely not find anything. Always remember, in a police interaction, only one of you are legally allowed to lie.
I can guarantee there was no call. They need to manufacture some type of alert to justify them inserting themselves where they're neither wanted nor needed.
First thing to ask when being told by a cop that "Somebody called in to report you as suspicious", is "I want the name and address of the person who accused me of being suspicious, so that I can sue them in a court of law for slandering my good name and bringing me into disrepute".
I was thinking the whole time, “just please own up to your mistake”. A simple: “I apologize sir, I was mistaken” goes a LONG way and people respect you for that. This is why Pride is a sin; it’s not that pride is inherently bad, people are just often prideful about the wrong things or egocentric.
The amount of people not able to admit mistake, or feel shame when doing so, is staggering. Ego problem og maybe even toxic masculinity as it's a lot more prevelant with men (I can't believe I said that).
@@svendbentjensen5512 Being honest, even if the truth you have to admit is a bit uncomfortable, speaks to character & integrity. You have those qualities; the officer in the video does not.
I love how the cop then refused to give his name and badge number when he more then likely is required to. But yet wants to harass an innocent citizen for Id when he had no obligation to. That cop should be fired, not only did he act like a tool the whole time, but then to refuse giving his name and badge number shows how childish and his disgust for the ppl he is supposed to be protecting and serving not violating innocent ppl just cause. He obvi forgot who pays him
"For failing to properly train him." Respectfully, training isn't the issue. Cops like him often know damn well what they're doing, but figure they can get away with it. More often than not, they do. If cops like him were held more accountable, the lack of training would cease being a problem.
And I doubt "someone called in to report a suspicious person". I bet that was a blatant lie. Police are told they can lie and I've noticed that many of them have no problem doing so. It's unnerving.
And it's usually the trainers that teach them this sort of conduct. This kinda attitude and sense of superiority comes from the top down. Especially since this man has a history.
@@LunaS043 Cops are trained in verbal judo just as they are trained how to manipulate people with lies and intimidation, and let's not forget their extensive training in pain compliance techniques. Training is by it's very nature a top down process.
The sergeant was like:"ah shit, another unexperienced cop arguing with a dude with a camera, why y'all youngster keep falling for that?!" Ended it under a minute and saved that cops ass.
If only other "inexperienced" people could make nearly $120K annually. 12:30 To be paid that much to do a job, don't you think you should know more about the rules/laws of that job and behave accordingly?
@@lareh5501 Go for it! Try it, there are so many freaking laws it's nearly impossible to know all of them at the spot when u need them, what u talking about describes a lawyer or judge, not an cop. There is more to be a cop then just knowing the laws like a Asperger kid.
@@headintheclouds999 That's probably why it takes 4-5 years to become a police officer in most European countries, because legal education is at least 60-70% of the education. If you can become a police officer in less than a year you don't have a versatile education covering, the law, psychology, anthropology, martial arts, etc., what you have if you can get a badge in less than one year is NOT an education. It's a course! Where I live it is also a requirement that police officers regularly renew their exams and that they stay physically fit and that they at all times are able to pass all their original exams as well as the training course. That's the reason you see very few of these vulgarly obese and sweaty police officers in Europe as you do in the US. (Of course you can find a few bad apples in some European countries too, but the rate are significantly smaller.) Police in Denmark (where I live) also film all interactions with citizens (like in the US), but furthermore they inform citizens that it is their right to videotape or make an audio recording of the entire altercation, in some instances even encourage it, as that would only serve as a protection of both parties, as that will provide them with an extra piece of evidence that establish if any of the recordings have been tampered with.
@@headintheclouds999 It's nearly impossible if you don't have any real training. Anywhere in the developed world cops undergo many years of training so that incidents like these do not happen. Sadly the US has a very lackluster training program for cops and so such incidents are extremely common and the reason why cops hurt and kill more people than many criminals do.
How can we continue to employ people who don’t understand the bounds of their job? As a trucking company owner, I could never employ someone who cannot drive a truck. Same should be with our public servants.
The analogy would be to go back to the 70s, and have all your employees members of the Teamsters Union when they yielded a lot of power. You're right - if an officer can't perform a routine stop (a common task), it is reasonable to wonder if he knows how to do anything.
That Sargeant deserves an A and to be commended for adhering to the law instead of doing what so many do (just going along with what any wrong cop does!) Sargeant also deserves respect for respecting a person who is not doing something wrong and just calmly explaining the areas not to be filmed , defusing a situation before it gets escalated by that ego-tripping officer ! I wish there were more cops like that Sargeant because it might inspire more folks to respect the police. We know that rarely do criminals respect the police (I have family in law enforcement and they know to respect people and not jump to pushing people around and they use common sense when dealing with folks and don't immediately jump to the "you're wrong if I say you are and I don't care about your rights when my ego is bruised" nonsense! so my relatives have been well respected even by criminals they've arrested in the past -I know this because I've had some of the folks they arrested in the past,, tell me) but the common non criminal citizen is losing respect for police because of the ego tripping " don't know the law and I don't care about the law" bully cops.
@@patrickmcpartland1398 Unfortunately, Sargents don't do the hiring so he may not have a day in who is hired and fired. He can put in his recommendation or disapproval but he is not a final "say". There are officers above his rank and the Mayor... Unfortunately...
As a 911 operator, I took literally thousands of calls from people reporting someone "suspicious." So I would always ask them, "Why are they suspicious? What are they doing?" A lot of times, people would answer that they just "didn't like the way that person looked." I would tell them that's not suspicious in the least, because people can look however they want. And I would tell them to give me specifics as to WHAT they were doing that was making them suspicious. If they couldn't articulate it, I would send an officer to talk to the caller, which ended up being labeled an "educational contact." You can't call the cops because a black man is walking down your public sidewalk, or someone is making a video on the public sidewalk. BUT if someone is taking pictures of your children in your yard, yeah, that's a reason to send someone out.
@@major_kukri2430 too much liability in just hanging up. I could have been fired for hanging up on someone and not sending officers. And too often someone does call for what sounds like a ridiculous reason but it turns out to be a real emergency situation where they couldn't talk freely. I had to take every call seriously, even when I had the repeat callers.
@@elizabethcompton738 I get that, but you're not telling me that after the fifth call of a Karen reporting a black man for "walking suspiciously" that the idea of hanging up didn't cross your mind.
I can't stand that when officers are around civilians, they become bullies and make you feel that your knowledge or word doesn't mean anything. I'm glad to see videos like this. Although I'm always afraid to do this cuz I don't want to go to jail regardless if I'm in the right
I've seen more than once (on video) cops respond along the lines of "are you a lawyer?" when civilians try to protect their rights, as if the Constitution only applies to those who have gone to law school.
@@Moohasha1 damn it's also great when you got a quick-witted auditor like Johnny 50 that will tell him he didn't know they're six months in the academy gave them a law degree
I was with him on the other side of the building. He even credited me in his description with ‘pat of shame’. That being said he’s no longer filming in public. This guy was the absolute best for a small channel. I went filming for the very first time with this guy. He taught me a ton. He’s also a great dude.
I’ve watched several of your videos and I complement you on the high quality of content, editing and overall production. I’ve noticed a theme with these auditors. They seem to be fishing for a conflict to record for their own YT channels. The police officers seem to take the bait and engage in a power struggle. The Sgt demonstrated the proper way to de escalate a situation.
I love it when police officers say "you're not in any trouble but ..." The minute you hear that, you know that the officer is not acting in good faith.
Ohh that cop's face looked like he was burned. Like it heart went into his stomach. The Sargent, was awesome. He didn't want to be petty, and he didn't seem to let his title go to his head.
We finally see a supervisor acting like a real supervisor and not automatically defending his officers. And Deputy Fife got a big Crow waiting on him at home
As a now retired lawyer I have been asking myself, judges, and prosecutors for over 45 years, "Why can't the police obey the law? and, '' why don't the police know basic laws?". When I was a prosecutor I held a force wide, mandatory attendance, "Legal updates" seminar for my PD. I lasted there for 15 years.
I can't decide if these officers are really stupid or arrogant. These auditors have been doing this for years now. The officers have bodycams. EVERYBODY has camera phones. Even if they probably won't have to face any meaningful consequences. Don't they feel any shame?.
You're a rare prosecutor. I'd like to know, why is it more important to get a conviction rather then getting the right person or giving someone the correct charge?
If the cop already stated "you aren't in any trouble" then he clearly already concluded that the man was NOT engaged in "suspicious activity", and obviously wouldn't need his ID even if it was a stop & identify state. This boils down to the cop wanting to be obeyed, like usual. Whenever these types of cops start trying to argue with someone regarding rights, they either have no idea what a person's rights even are, or they just don't give a shit. A lot of times I think it's a mixture of both. They have an inkling of an idea what our rights are, but they don't give a shit to understand better, and they don't give a shit to respect the rights they are aware of. Our supposedly equal branches of government have gotten to where cops are somehow granted the most power & authority on a daily basis, with people's rights being violated in some shape or another on a literally daily basis. Of course this goes to their head. They also get away with lying in reports & in court all too often.
their attitude is upheld by politicians...it actually ties in with our current situation with cv19...they will have no problem beating us into submission over it.
It actually sucks because cops are entitled to lie to people they’re “investigating,” so him saying he’s “not in trouble” doesn’t actually end suspicion
In my opinion most cops know our rights and basic laws. The cops don't care and violate your rights easily because of their ego and they rarely get into trouble. Cops are used to people listening and obeying any order given.
@Ms. Kitty Katt in case you haven't noticed we're already under a fascist regime using the pandemic as reason and giving leo carte blanche to enforce it...and that's happening worldwide. Christians are not your enemy.
Officers misconduct should reflect on his next evaluation. He's incapable of deescalation and easily triggered. His misuse of "suspicious behavior" is his excuse to criminalize lawful acts.
Cop's should never be able to legally stop or detain anyone for any reason, other than breaking the law! I am not a free man if I must submit to a cop when I have never broken any law! The Constitution is Paramount, not unconstitutional law!
But sometimes an investigation is needed to determine if a you broke a law and they should and do have the legal right to detain you while they are completing that investigation. The problem comes when there is no suspicion of a crime. Then you should not be detained.
@@mkhartnett Exactly. Cops can and SHOULD be able to detain you while investigating suspicion of a crime. Unfortunately, MANY police officers choose to investigate non-crimes, and choose NOT to investigate actual crimes. EDIT: And if their investigation of a crime doesn't pan out (ie, it's proven you didn't commit the crime they suspect you of) sometimes they'll continue to investigate to find out what crimes they can charge you for. Some cops are outstanding fishermen.
@@mkhartnett The vast majority of investigations can be performed by standing 30-50 feet away and observing for a minute or 2. The two main problems is that some cops go on a power trip and are more interested in confonting people than promoting justice, and department policies require names of suspects on reports even when it is obvious the suspect did nothing wrong.
@Phuck RUclips in that case, they are looking for a specific person linked to a specific known crime. That's different than stopping someone on the suspicion of possible crime when they are not doing anything blatantly illegal.
That was the most absurd statement the cop made. You hear this all the time from LEO's who don't know the law so they fabricate the most absurd situations, in case this turns into that which can become something else that can then be....blah, blah, blah. That cop is so full of shit that it's coming out of his ears.
The real issue with this type of interaction is that cops are pretty much universally taught to always try to ID everyone they encounter so that they can run them for warrants, reasonable suspicion be damned.
@@garbageparade5144 What a ridiculous thing to say. Only a tiny percentage of the population has warrants. But it wouldn't matter if that wasn't the case. The cops have no business sifting through the population, looking for things over which to bust people. It is outrageous. "Stop and frisk" and checkpoints are abominations to liberty. Trying to get everyone they encounter to identify themselves as happens in this video, and countless others, is right along that line.
Not only was the sergeant professional but it's a step in cleaning up the image of the police department. Who out there says videotaping the police doesn't work?
The interaction here happens very infrequently.... BUT the interactions the officers must deal with 1000's of times a day in this Country with the democrat voting filth is what need's to be "cleaned up" and thrown out. They continuously have to deal with the same criminal element because of the libturded policies and actions of the DA's and Judges who do not do their jobs.
@@simroc1289 So basically you're calling the Bill of Rights and the Constitution "A Libturd piece of filth"...I'm so ashamed that you actually try to politicize the inalienable rights provided to you by the State/Country for just being an obstacle to try to trample to usher us into a police/militarized citizen control system...Step outside of your box and take an impartial look at things, then form an "Educated" opinion....Apalling you are...
@@simroc1289 In 2019, a total of 2 NYPD officers were shot and killed in the line of duty. Both of them were killed by friendly fire. Police officers are so fucking good at killing people, they have a higher chance of being killed by a fellow officer than by someone they stop on the street.
@@simroc1289 Pretty sure it's republicans more often than not screaming that they're being oppressed and resisting arrest because they think laws dont apply to them because they bow down to the Tangerine Palpatine.
@@lambdaman3228 Actually yes there is, but hey nice try. Only time it is allowed is if the officer is a member of an undercover unit. A uniformed officer initiating contact with someone absolutely does have to identify themselves, in most states the first words out of the officers mouth is "Hello, I am officer blah blah blah with the blah police department. Reason for the stop is...".
All their ever wanting to do is exercise their "authority" over anyone they come into contact with.. it's a known fact that when you give someone the power to police over other people, they will naturally develop a prejudice against the person's they police
When the cop says “provide your documentation” it sends chills all over my body. That’s a slippery slope and the world has seen the horrible countries that do that.
Slippery slope??? We are deep into it already. Fools rushed their asses into “vaccination camps” to receive a dose (doses) of HIGHLY questionable juice and now are EAGER to “show their papers”.
@@Abedeuss You just made a judgement of another based on zero evidence. You also reinforced and supported the actions of tyrants. The programming worked on you.
It should be law that they have to play those calls in a way that protects the callers identity because we all know about 80% of these calls don't exist.
It's hilarious how the police always say "You're making this more difficult than it has to be" while they are making it more difficult than it has to be 😆
He received so much backlash that he damn near quit his job. His sergeant reprimanded him after this and literally said that if he would have placed him under arrest not only would have the department been sued but he would have lost his qualified immunity and his job.
It’s rarely a training issue. It’s generally an “I don’t care, and I know I won’t be held accountable” problem. No amount of training will correct a character flaw. This officer has some major character flaws which are likely too prevalent to be overcome to a point that he could serve as an honorable peace officer with a genuine desire to serve the greater good of the community and work to prevent and serve as a seeker of justice on behalf of the citizens. Sadly, even some who are suited to do their duty are derailed by those at the top of the food chain who are too often concerned about their political motivations and pushing for statistics in order to receive more federal grant money…like needing x number o& ticket# and DWI arrests each month to make sure they get that federal highway money and they need to make so many drug possession an$ distribution cases in order to qualify for the ATF task force appointments, or they need however many violent crime stats in order to push the council for a budget increase and to hire more officers…expanding government…increasing power…more clout to push the agenda…and see to it that the department operates in an “equitable manner”…because some idiots still believe that policing is a social experiment and that diversity is our strength…
Where are you getting this information about quotas for specific types of arrests or citations? Or why meeting these quotas is the way to access a higher spending budget, which will inevitably be spent on more officers so the department can grow larger and more powerful?
That officer defied his own supervisor, in public, and refused to comply with his own department’s policies. He should be on probation, and should always be accompanied by an officer Senior to him.
I am believing more and more that they know the law, they are counting on civilians not knowing the law. When they come across someone who does know the law they don't know what to do, instead of admitting they was wrong, God forbid they do that, they just double down.
Well his actions are epidemic amongst police departments across the county, so I’d quit your day job and start doing workshops for all the academy trainings so the public is not harassed and you’d probably make a lot more money.
Sounds like Officer Moschella needs to learn the phrase: "Would you like to file a lawsuit with that?" Shouldn't be too difficult for him - lots of people with his level of training have learned to say a very similar phrase.
I am more inclined to think he is the department fok up. 10:58 Notice the supervisor's glance, supervisor didn't ask the officer what the reasonable suspicion was, he just assumed the officer was wrong, and cut off the officer before he dug his hole deeper.
Yes he probley was taught this at some point but he knows it's contrary to the law . He saw his Sargent operate in a different and correct manner, he's seen the wrong way and the right way, he knows which is which so when he knowingly chooses the wrong way he by default exposes his true self
This cop is dangerous because he is what I call a justifier. He does what he wants, he is driven by his ego and he justifies anything he does no matter how ridiculous his justifications are. In the end his ego was controlling him to the point where he refused to admit he was wrong and even contradicted his supervisor right in front oh him. I was married to a person with this personality trait and I can tell you this cop is dangerous.
HAHAHA!! Technically speaking, he did NOT lie about always having ID. Fingerprints, retinas, or even his face (facial recognition) technically speaking IS a form of identification. I love it. I’m going to use this.
@@grahamto8181 lmao yes exactly. I would love to watch this play out in court. The look on the cops face when he realizes that technically the guy was telling the truth because of those examples above haha cop is too stupid to wrap his head around this concept
@Future Pants you do realize no one was discussing the statistical reality of what percentage of Americans have the savings to pursue court cases like these, right? We were joking around about this guy playing on words and how the cop was too stupid to understand. Good job ruining the joke👍🏽
No amount of time nor training can ever change or correct that officer’s deficiencies.. I agree he’s a danger to the public and himself… he should be relieved of active duty before he kill someone.
Get his family to counseling! The demeanor on the job goes home to the family. LEOs are practicing dominance 24/7/365, especially at home under a cone of silence.
It goes without saying that Sergeant Ruiz gets an A+ here! Check out my second channel for more content: ruclips.net/channel/UClTjur-9cx8Bb4MW8r0K6xw
He even gave out the name and badge number of the officer when the officer refused.
Crazy to me that the officer can illegally demand ID in this case while illegally refusing to give his name and badge number
If i didn't think I'd get murdered the first week, I'd like to be a Auditor.
Why does the sergeant get an A+ but not the journalist? What could the journalist have done better?
@@devonmarr9872 It's not illegal to refuse to hand out your badge/ID as a cop. But it's usually against department policy.
@@mathwizard10 "I always have my ID on me."
"I don't have my ID."
Contradictory statements. While not a huge huge deal it is still something to avoid so that is why I think he shouldn't get the +
Omg the humiliation must be unbearable, the sergeant literally crushed his officer's ego
Rightfully so!
@@JokesRJokes 10 to 1 , he went home and kicked the dog and beat his wife .
Well-read, let's just say his flying eagle turned out to be a half dead buzzard roosting on a rock.
And he was still trying to talk over his sarg.
TWICE
That sergeant is a hero. He de-escalated the situation in less than 1 minute and put the citizen's rights above his officer's ego. A+++
A++ tops. 3 plusses requires the officers to wash your car or give you a bj.
He supported, defended and preserved the Constitution of the United States, as he took an oath to do. I've reminded a few cops of that oath from time to time. I took the same oath, and it never expires.
But he didn't get a grade on the video.....
WHY are SO many people just A-holes; uncooperative, immature, instigating A-hole$ behaving like petulant toddlers?!?!?!
And there are throngs more morons applauding the behavior, absolutely astonishing 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️
It is amazing how quickly these situations can be ended just by the officer knowing the law.
Even if officers are annoyed by auditors, and some of them are really annoying on purpose, if you follow they law they have nothing they can do.
Are you serious? That idiot is getting $118K a year for being a public nuisance with a badge? He should be fired. Kudos to the sergeant for quickly and accurately assessing the situation and de-escalating. We need more cops like Sergeant Ruiz.
" should be "
The sergeant should get an A+ for knowing the law, defusing the situation and not blindly backing up the officers spurious 'logic'.
"Hope you learned something today"
That was savage, and I'm here for it.
this is officer ballsack
“Lex Fridman is dangerous” 18 min inspirational video on RUclips ends w the poem “if” by R Kipling
I’m sure he didn’t learn nothing smh
Now you need to leave
"You're making this more difficult than it needs to be."
And there it is!
The presumptuous; I have every right because I have the badge and gun and you're just the inferior small guy that's supposed to bow to my will attitude. It's sickening.
Based on the supervisor's response, I get the feeling the officer is the department fok-up, a "Special" guy who keeps a short hair cut so he doesn't injure himself with his comb.
Also, this cop in particular has a record of violence towards others he's "investigated." He should be stripped and jailed pending an investigation.
He is literally creating the difficulty
The "you're making me beat you" defense. Cops use abuser logic all the time
@Aniello M. Rapists*
To show how out of control his ego was, he attempted to correct his supervisor when the supervisor corrected him!
ya I seen that. said supervisor was wrong.
@@BrokefishN and he's probably been violating rights from day one .
To me, this is one of the critical factors in judging the officers ability to conduct himself in a proper manner while carrying out his duties. To opening challenge a superior like that is proof that he he has difficulty even controlling himself.
The one thing I have trouble understanding, lieutenants, captains, sergeants, corporals. But not following orders is very worrisome, telling your sergeant that he is wrong is not going to help this idiots career.
@@lamorgan2006 he is an idiot. He will get nothing but raises and promotions.
Dude literally said his superior was wrong when he HIMSELF was 100% incorrect. That is a special kind of entitlement, cockyness, and disrespect. Officer M is dangerous. He needs to get fired. This is just the beginning of him being a tyrant.
Facts. Ppl like this literally go out of their way to be police officers for this reason- to strong aem ppl. It's disgusting. He's such a loser.
Yea the fact he would not give his name and badge number after he was found wrong just shows a really bad ego problem that will eventually get him in trouble. The only good thing was he did not get to the point of acrually arresting him. Some cops would have by this point. But I do not understand why these cops are not trained better at this.
He will get his azz kick some day some how because of his high EGOS 😊
Funny how egos & respect don’t go hand in hand’s 😮 POS 😅
There's another video where that same cop arrested an auditor when the auditor was acting like douchebag and the sarge gave him the ok to arrest the auditor. He grabbed the auditor twisted his arm high behind his back and dumped him on the ground. Yup, that cop is a bad cop.
“You’re not in trouble.” If the cop has already decided he is not in trouble why even instigate an interaction?
because he "got a call", law enforcements' catchall to violate rights.
It's a blatant lie. Nothing unusual here.
NJ cops itch at any opportunity to ticket citizens. They’re the kinda cops that hide in bushes waiting for people to drive 5 mph over the speed limit.
They also love young drivers if you live near urban communities. Cops will create any story to pull over kids thinking they have drugs. Especially if your a white kid in predominately black community.
@@sammybubba176
No one called the police like he said
@@3twelve206 or vice-versa
"I hope you learned something today" that probably hurt him down to his testicle. 🤣
Just the one testicle, not the other one😂😂
@@popeshabba4266 with his behavior he probably only has one.
@@h1de Mangina ?
@@MartyP-lr7vw lol yes but with one drooping testicle 🤣🤣
@@MartyP-lr7vw Old Greg
I love this!! "That's actually incorrect in that respect." "I'm clear, you're clear, is he clear?" "So now your Sergeant is wrong?" Man, that cop is on a serious power trip that even when his Sergeant says there's no criminal offense, the cops says that actually not correct. I love the way the Sergeant came up, asked a question, got the answer and totally diffused the situation.
it's not power tripping anymore; it's trying desperately to salvage a wounded ego
@@xdavidliu sadly that a common flaw of human ego, not cop ego. argue with anyone on anything, and 3/10 people will never give up their side no matter how wrong they are. it just gets more dangerous with humans in positions of authority, especially when they're trained by mercenary companies pretending to be police training companies who use urban combat tactics like shock and awe, intimidation, domination of the scene and subjects, and forced compliance. horribly approach to instruction by the evil corportations selected by our political leaders is 50% of the problem. sets up the whole stage, perspective, and rapport into an adversarial and hostile situation from the get go. innately dysfunctional and immoral.
The need to play God is strong with the small little grunts.
One important lesson I’m learning from these videos is to learn much more about the amendment’s rights and my state’s laws. Thank you to this and other similar channels for educating us!
A cop’s favorite line when doing something he shouldn’t is “you’re making this harder than it needs to be.” Yes I am. I’m making it harder for you to abuse your power. Cry about it tyrant
It's the rapist mentality kicking in. "You're making this harder than it needs to be" is what rapists say.
Here, here.
@@drewmesiano7602 How about the officer do his job correctly and not insist on violating people's rights.
"Thank you for answering my questions. Be sure to stay on the sidewalk and mind the signs that limit access to certain parts of the property."
Both go on their way in this scenario too and no cops needlessly violate any citizen's right to privacy.
@@drewmesiano7602 What perp? If cops treat everyone as criminals, we lose our rights.
He was taking pictures, legally. And answered all questions, respectfully. Officers to not have a right to identify every single person they ever encounter, simply to 'have the encounter on record'.
If the officer did his job legally and correctly, this encounter would have been smooth and quick. HE is responsible for the extended encounter NOT the citizen just going about his business, doing nothing wrong.
@@SteveMKoch FACTS!!
This sergeant is one in a million,honest and brave hopefully his job is safe ,the US public needs more officers like him,God bless him.
Exactly, and the institutions hate guys like these.
Yes
@@Syncopia And that Good Ma'am or Sir, is exactly the perfect point of the whole matter in a nutshell...Thank You for Your Eloquent Expression...
Sad that the standard is so low. He literally was just doing his job - but amongst so many bad cops that makes him a hero!! SMH
Especially in leadership positions. That's how you really make positive incremental change, because they will train officers to conduct themselves professionally, then they will then become leaders and the cycle continues.
"Hope you learned something today" 💀💀💀 A+ for this citizen to defend his rights, and get in a few verbal jabs, but staying respectful.
@@loveurlife4ever1 Dude. Stop spamming.
Truth hurts the stupid!!
best part 😂
Only in Jersey. ;-)
They are nothing more than hired ignorant criminal gestapo thugs,employed by a corrupt dictatorship tyrannical government
I love how his boss just walks over and overruled him. So sweet
"We investigated ourselves and determined we did nothing wrong."
"The matter is being investigated and addressed as any other incidents that have come to our attention"
Ah, so it isn't
@@warriorgp4640 it's going to be said as many times as law enforcement agencies pull this shit and refuse to hold their own accountable. Sorry it's so annoying
@@warriorgp4640 Very often cliches have a basis in reality. In this case, the Police Chief stated the matter was being investigated. Yet it's unclear what, if any, disciplinary action was taken in response to this incident. It's possible that the Police Chief came down hard on this officer, but it's also very possible there was little or even no action taken against the officer. Because how does that cliche go again?
@@__sm1441 It is annoying. But you know what’s more annoying? Not being able to trust our folks in blue because some of em do shit like this and NEVER held responsible.
@@warriorgp4640 sounds as though, you have an issue with the actual law..hopefully you are not a member of law enforcement, and if you are, learn the law, and follow it..That's what you are paid to do...
“I hope you learned something today”. Gold. Pure gold.
That’s our Jersey smartass for you, lol. Absolutely love it!!!
I LOVE THAT
Gotta give the SGT. an A+. He didn’t need to discuss with his officer how to try to make a legal arrest, just listened to what was going on and did the right and legal thing. He should also get props for giving up the officers info as well as his own.
The sergeant is equally responsible for the behavior of his officer that he observed and would share the same liability if he allowed it to go on
No. He was a bit of a dick too. No need to give directions about what he can and can’t do.
@@BeefyTime1 He wasn't being a dick, he was trying to keep the situation from escalating further. Providing further information to the citizen so that he knew to avoid certain areas and not give the 1st officer grounds to actually arrest or detain him.
@@rogerm3708 I would generally agree but not this time. There were times I've tried to put someone out of uniform that was my subordinate, but couldn't. Then when that person brings unwanted attention to the force my superiors would ask, what have you (me) done to train this person? My comment was always, "look in his/her review files, if I had my way he/she would have been gone a long time ago and we wouldn't be in this mess or having this discussion".
It appears to me that this SGT stopped this just in time. Mr. State nearly became an injured, and possibly wealthy man. And I have a funny feeling that the SGTs superiors was not happy with the SGT. Especially given the way the chief swept it under the rug. The AtA said it perfectly about this cop. My opinion, he's a bully and gets a rush on his ability to hurt someone Knowing they won't defend themselves and are not allowed to defend themselves.
@Sean Pushor EXACTLY WHAT I THOUGHT. SUPERVISOR. Walked up, asked a simple question and CORRECTED his BOY, that he was wrong and to move on. The SUPERVISOR GETS AN A+
I’ve always been pro police for 52 years and the last two years I have no respect for law-enforcement anymore. Especially with cameras coming out especially my local Sheriffs Dept. They are absolutely horrible. I commend everybody that stands up for their rights. It’s the most important thing we have now in the United States and we’re losing them every day.
So you are a exbootlicker how did it worked out 52 years knowing you supported in a system that ruined innocent lives by lies on police reports 😮
"Have a good day officer...hope YOU learned something today" the icing on the cake lol
Yep just goes to show how petty and arrogant this guy is
@@garbageparade5144 Only person arrogant was the pig, not the citizen.
@@jw7665 I said what I said
@@garbageparade5144 No worries, I can smell the bacon on you
@@garbageparade5144 He only gave Ofc. Moschella the same level of respect he was given. You want to talk about arrogance. Ofc. Moschella wouldn't even acknowledge that Sgt. Ruiz was correct. You want to talk about petty. Ofc. Moschella tried making up BS to get this man's info and then was all pissy when challenged. Then at the end of all this he wouldn't even give his name (which is required). So it seems that Ofc. Moschella likes to enforce the law, threaten with the law, but not follow it. But the man behind the video is petty and arrogant, sure buddy.
11:02 The Sergeant's face when he realises how dumb his officer is is priceless:
- "Frank, Frank, Frank, just hold on a second"
I TAKE MY HAT OFF, FOR THE SERGEANT,....AND LET HIM KNOW THAT I APRECIATED,...HIS RESPECT FOR THE CITIZEN,....
Frank would’ve loaded the Jews on the trains without question. Clearly he lacks any kind of intelligence or respect for civil rights.
@@climber950 well said.
Where is the training? Wtf they are doing w our tax money? Educate these mofos and cameras on while on duty.
@@rosavillavicencio7868 :God Bless the Sergeant, he is true to His Oath of Honor and shows Respect for the Private-Sector Citizens and Private-Sector Taxpayers, and Private-Sector Voters. We need more like him, that shows Respect for the Police "Oath of Honor"...
The scary part is this officer thinks he is 100 percent right and doesn't know the law.
And what's more scary is that you can see in the first officers face he still thinks he is right and will continue to do the same exact thing to others that don't know their rights are being trampled, regardless of more training.
I know, it's crazy. I used to think they were all just lying when it comes to stuff like this, but the more you see it, you can tell they don't know. Really makes me wonder how many people get unjustly arrested and end up pleading guilty, either for a deal or just to get it over with.
I wonder if he even can read
@@Dzimon350 no he can't read.
What's more scary, officer Brutus will defend his 100% certainty all the way back to the police station with the perpetrator in tow.
So, I am so tired of hearing these cops say suspicious suspicion. I'm sick of it.
There is likely a system generated record number attached to each call. They should have to provide that so you can verify it.😂
The sargeant knew he was a tyrant from previous behaviour and SHUT HIM STRAIGHT DOWN needs sacking before he kills someone.
I agree with this, absolutely
He's definitely going to murder someone for something petty like not stroking his ego 🙄 💀 😒
The script that police have memorized is amazing…” you’re making this more difficult than this has to be” anytime someone exercises their rights
Lmfao seriously. their like
“oh shit he knows his rights what do I do now..?”
Making this more difficult for who exactly......the narcissism is real
Maybe more difficult than it _needs_ to be, but not more difficult than his rights permit him to make it.
Cops need to understand that the constitution is first and foremost intended to be a collection of defensive rights to protect civilians and make law enforcement jobs harder _on purpose._
And the “suspicions person calls” l
Damn straight I am. You think I'm just gonna lay down and let you walk all over my rights? You're gonna have to work for this one pal.
The look on that cop’s face at the end says everything. Absolutely infuriated and red-eyed with rage over the fact that he had to follow his oath, check his planet-sized ego and respect a citizen’s rights. The HORROR.
That is the disconnect right there. Every citizen is just a statistic to them. They only care about themselves and their inflated pensions.
Mediterraneans really don't belong in North America. They do not have the spirit of freedom.
And this fool really said that the law had nothing to do with the law 🤦♀️ I wonder if he has any working brain cells left up there if it’s just got crayons stuck up there like Homer Simpsons.
The guy who filmed this is an instigator and a piece of crap human. All he is trying to do is rile up the police so he can become famous. He's only there to try and piss people off.
@@tonyrains217 Sorry but we're allowed to exist in our country.
@@tonyrains217 yeah well, he was just filming where he's allowed to be. The officer has the option to not be instigated. You have nothing but tyranny to back up your perspective.
I appreciate your objectivity in content. I feel like I am being blasted by videos of officer misconduct, with mimimal coverage of those doing their jobs well. Thank you for providing coverage of officers staying true to their oath.
Sergeant Ruiz is MORE of what we need. Thank you Sergeant Ruiz for being a real police officer.
Anyone requiring adult supervision to conduct their job in a professional manner, especially when they are expected to understand and uphold the law while carrying a gun, is clearly unfit for that duty.
From my experience, most adults need adult supervision. That's why we have leaders.
@@TRDiscordian If you think our current crop of "in charges" are leaders... good luck with that. Kind of explains how officer short dick got hired.
@@TRDiscordian You fail to understand what a leader is. You have it confused with supervisor.
Well said.
@@TRDiscordian I think his point was that, police officers should have a higher degree of professionalism and intelligence. They certainly should know the laws, if they are in a position to uphold said laws.
So yeah, burger King employees need leaders, but in theory, police shouldn't, at least not as much that has been shown throughout time.
Supervisor deserves an A+ for calmly assessing the situation in a non bias manner and determining that the citizen was well within his rights and also stepping in to provide identification for both him and his officer
No he doesn't....he was arrogant and patronizing. He took 0 time to address the actual issue (his officer not knowing basic law and threatening a citizen with arrest) and was off-putting to Mr. State. Sure he told him he could video and take pictures but didn't do his job
I strongly suspect he knew it was a first amendment audit and was trying to get out of the situation without a lawsuit. Given his condescension and unwillingness to reprimand the officer I'm guessing this plays out differently if it isn't filmed.
*Assessing the situation* - 10:58 Supervisor should have first asked his officer for his reasonable suspicion, not question the detainee, and then end the detention promptly - supervisor extended an already illegal detention.
*Provide Officers' Info* - likely a requirement, and later covering for the officer.
C for the supervisor.
@@Djatrak03, do you think it is the supervisor's job to admonish the officer in public? He completely undercut the officer and embarrassed him thoroughly. By identifying hik when the officer refused to identify he finished him off.
@@Djatrak03 Uh, no? Disciplinary action and re-education should be done in private. It's not a spectacle for the public to ogle at.
just think how many times this officer violates citizens' rights on any given day.
But this Time it was on camera & he was corrected but his high EGOS still won’t let it go the failed to identify as a officer speak high volume about him
Its clear Officer Mascara's ego wouldnt let him walk away from this interaction . Spot on audit as usual .
He had that hallway bully demeanor about him. Bet he played football for his high school team.
It's clear another clown harassing police officers trying to do their job.
These clowns are not journalist.
They need to stop claiming that they are and using that constitutional right.
This video shows exactly how these clowns lie. Rather having to show it or not.
@@ralphtrynor9719 Journalists exist to show the rest of us the world as it really is. We are now truly seeing cops for the pigs they are. Making up lies to satisfy their egos. Too bad you got your nose stuck so far up their a**es.
@@ralphtrynor9719 "It's clear another clown harassing police officers trying to do their job. " Did the cop approach the auditor or the other way around ? Yeah that answer is obvious . Could you explain how it is a police officers job to violate citizens civil right because i thought their job was to enforce laws . "They need to stop claiming that they are and using that constitutional right." 1 st amendment rights apply to every citizen and legal alien not just to people employed by a corporate media outlet . The supreme court had to established this because it was questioned by egotistical authoritarians and stupid people . Which category do you fit under ? "This video shows exactly how these clowns lie. " Yes these 🤡 do lie and Mascara's superior confirmed it .
@@RobertSmith-lg7jp wasn't the cop responding to a call, right. (HIS JOB) or did he just go up to him for no reason. Or did auditor provoke the encounter.
Now did the auditor go where he knew that he was going to encounter police officers. The answer is yes.
We all know that they do. You're lying if you say they don't.
So try again but with something with some common sense.
Cop: “You are making this more difficult than it needs to be.”
Citizen: “Honoring your oath to NOT violate my Constitutional rights is NEVER a difficulty.”
No action taken
Blue line action taken blue line
@@charlesferguson7421 ? 🙄
Why wasn’t the Sergeant given a grade? He de-escalated the situation beautifully. He should be commended for handling the situation so professionally. A+ for the Sergeant.
Why? he didn't reprimand nor take any action against his tyrant officer.
He gave him a grade as a pinned comment
@@mctie8040 he should have called out that grade in the video.
@Phuck RUclips no, cops are there to enforce made up laws, break real laws and use abuser logic. You are correct in they aren't here to entertain us.
Sergeant gets a C. He did a great job of de-escalation, but he should have reprimanded the officer in front of the victim. It doesn't require anything much, just "if you insist on illegally arresting this guy I'll be forced to arrest *you*."
118 thousand dollars a year is paid to an officer that has no concept the actual law that he was trying to arrest someone for? What other business or company would keep someone employed that has no idea how to do their job.
Man, I feel bad for the next person this officer has an interaction with
No shit. He is going to get his pound of flesh somehow. That is a look of pain and bottled rage. He is going to fvck something or somebody up.
yeah his wife is gonna hate life.
His husband
@@rickperez375 😂😂🤣🤣🤣
@@wintermoon5442 Unfortunately you're probably not wrong. I have a lot of cops in my family and they definitely take out their frustrations on their wives and kids 😔
When these auditors do this stuff correctly like this, it's fun to watch.
I don't get why the officers don't know this and keep taking the bait and falling for it. You can look out the window and see that it's an auditor and just leave them alone. If they'd stop giving them reason, auditors wouldn't be necessary.
I wouldnt do it but it is fun to watch.
if only more 1s amendment auditors were like this guy and actually understood the 1st amendment
Exactly just sit them in front of videos like this@@thirdmonkeyent_llc
It would be good if they weren't immediately aggressive (verbally). I don't like that in cops, or in auditors.
So the cop is pissed that he was lied to. How likely do you think it was that the pig lied about "receiving a call about a suspicious person"?
I want to know who is actually making all these suspicious persons calls into police departments every single time someone tries to film outside a station? I'm willing to bet either nobody called, or another officer called it in just to mess with the cameraman...
@@swooopg you could pour through all of the 911 calls for the hours prior to even being there and, in this case, would likely not find anything.
Always remember, in a police interaction, only one of you are legally allowed to lie.
@@wh4070 exactly! I love how it's always "we got a call about a suspicious persons", no you didn't sir, you are just nosy...
I can guarantee there was no call. They need to manufacture some type of alert to justify them inserting themselves where they're neither wanted nor needed.
If you are arrested you have a right to request the review of their call log to see if such a call was made. Most of the times it's made up bullshit.
First thing to ask when being told by a cop that "Somebody called in to report you as suspicious", is "I want the name and address of the person who accused me of being suspicious, so that I can sue them in a court of law for slandering my good name and bringing me into disrepute".
That’s a great point!!
This!! Defamation of character!!
The look on his face when his sergeant said he didn't need to show identification, priceless.
Shout out to Sgt Ruiz for putting his people in check and protecting that man's rights.
The way the camera swung back to the 1st officer after the Sargent Said it was Ok ...is comedy gold :)
So this cop is initially responding to hearsay. Then He needs the ID only for the purpose of CYA. Just in case something happens later.
I was thinking the whole time, “just please own up to your mistake”. A simple: “I apologize sir, I was mistaken” goes a LONG way and people respect you for that. This is why Pride is a sin; it’s not that pride is inherently bad, people are just often prideful about the wrong things or egocentric.
A lot of times in today's climate, admitting to wrongdoing is the last thing you'd want to do, actually
Well put!
Actually seen a video. Cops showed up to dudes house, Amd after it was done the cop came back and apologized and got fired. For saying sorry
The amount of people not able to admit mistake, or feel shame when doing so, is staggering. Ego problem og maybe even toxic masculinity as it's a lot more prevelant with men (I can't believe I said that).
@@svendbentjensen5512 Being honest, even if the truth you have to admit is a bit uncomfortable, speaks to character & integrity. You have those qualities; the officer in the video does not.
I love how the cop then refused to give his name and badge number when he more then likely is required to. But yet wants to harass an innocent citizen for Id when he had no obligation to. That cop should be fired, not only did he act like a tool the whole time, but then to refuse giving his name and badge number shows how childish and his disgust for the ppl he is supposed to be protecting and serving not violating innocent ppl just cause. He obvi forgot who pays him
Here Here!!!
"For failing to properly train him."
Respectfully, training isn't the issue. Cops like him often know damn well what they're doing, but figure they can get away with it. More often than not, they do. If cops like him were held more accountable, the lack of training would cease being a problem.
And I doubt "someone called in to report a suspicious person". I bet that was a blatant lie. Police are told they can lie and I've noticed that many of them have no problem doing so. It's unnerving.
It's always seems like the thing they lack training in seem to be the 1st things you would learn as a cop.
Well I think training is also suppose to weed these morons out. You know "you don't pass training you don't get job" type of deal.
And it's usually the trainers that teach them this sort of conduct. This kinda attitude and sense of superiority comes from the top down. Especially since this man has a history.
@@LunaS043 Cops are trained in verbal judo just as they are trained how to manipulate people with lies and intimidation, and let's not forget their extensive training in pain compliance techniques. Training is by it's very nature a top down process.
$118,130? WTF.
The sergeant was like:"ah shit, another unexperienced cop arguing with a dude with a camera, why y'all youngster keep falling for that?!" Ended it under a minute and saved that cops ass.
If only other "inexperienced" people could make nearly $120K annually. 12:30
To be paid that much to do a job, don't you think you should know more about the rules/laws of that job and behave accordingly?
@@lareh5501 Go for it! Try it, there are so many freaking laws it's nearly impossible to know all of them at the spot when u need them, what u talking about describes a lawyer or judge, not an cop.
There is more to be a cop then just knowing the laws like a Asperger kid.
@@headintheclouds999 That's probably why it takes 4-5 years to become a police officer in most European countries, because legal education is at least 60-70% of the education. If you can become a police officer in less than a year you don't have a versatile education covering, the law, psychology, anthropology, martial arts, etc., what you have if you can get a badge in less than one year is NOT an education. It's a course!
Where I live it is also a requirement that police officers regularly renew their exams and that they stay physically fit and that they at all times are able to pass all their original exams as well as the training course. That's the reason you see very few of these vulgarly obese and sweaty police officers in Europe as you do in the US. (Of course you can find a few bad apples in some European countries too, but the rate are significantly smaller.)
Police in Denmark (where I live) also film all interactions with citizens (like in the US), but furthermore they inform citizens that it is their right to videotape or make an audio recording of the entire altercation, in some instances even encourage it, as that would only serve as a protection of both parties, as that will provide them with an extra piece of evidence that establish if any of the recordings have been tampered with.
@@headintheclouds999 Then why do they get paid so much for knowing so little? Waste of taxes IMO
@@headintheclouds999 It's nearly impossible if you don't have any real training. Anywhere in the developed world cops undergo many years of training so that incidents like these do not happen. Sadly the US has a very lackluster training program for cops and so such incidents are extremely common and the reason why cops hurt and kill more people than many criminals do.
How can we continue to employ people who don’t understand the bounds of their job? As a trucking company owner, I could never employ someone who cannot drive a truck. Same should be with our public servants.
That’s a big 10-4
Hell swift does it everyday
The analogy would be to go back to the 70s, and have all your employees members of the Teamsters Union when they yielded a lot of power.
You're right - if an officer can't perform a routine stop (a common task), it is reasonable to wonder if he knows how to do anything.
@@jakeford9165 🤔😅😅😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣💜👍
The line between enforcing the law and behaving like a tyrant is very thin. That officer probably takes great pleasure in stepping over it
That Sargeant deserves an A and to be commended for adhering to the law instead of doing what so many do (just going along with what any wrong cop does!) Sargeant also deserves respect for respecting a person who is not doing something wrong and just calmly explaining the areas not to be filmed , defusing a situation before it gets escalated by that ego-tripping officer ! I wish there were more cops like that Sargeant because it might inspire more folks to respect the police. We know that rarely do criminals respect the police (I have family in law enforcement and they know to respect people and not jump to pushing people around and they use common sense when dealing with folks and don't immediately jump to the "you're wrong if I say you are and I don't care about your rights when my ego is bruised" nonsense! so my relatives have been well respected even by criminals they've arrested in the past -I know this because I've had some of the folks they arrested in the past,, tell me) but the common non criminal citizen is losing respect for police because of the ego tripping " don't know the law and I don't care about the law" bully cops.
A+ for then providing ID of the police officer and himself, who actually had a duty to identify themselves. Just 100% textbook perfect.
He deserves respect when he doesn't have trash like that on his force.
@@patrickmcpartland1398 Unfortunately, Sargents don't do the hiring so he may not have a day in who is hired and fired. He can put in his recommendation or disapproval but he is not a final "say". There are officers above his rank and the Mayor... Unfortunately...
@@andreasferenczi7613 ::"F" for the failing police officer. You can't fix ego, let him go. He is not suited for policing in our "Land of the Free"...
But that sargeant may also know who the auditors are in that area... and may be playing it up for the camera
As a 911 operator, I took literally thousands of calls from people reporting someone "suspicious." So I would always ask them, "Why are they suspicious? What are they doing?" A lot of times, people would answer that they just "didn't like the way that person looked." I would tell them that's not suspicious in the least, because people can look however they want. And I would tell them to give me specifics as to WHAT they were doing that was making them suspicious. If they couldn't articulate it, I would send an officer to talk to the caller, which ended up being labeled an "educational contact." You can't call the cops because a black man is walking down your public sidewalk, or someone is making a video on the public sidewalk. BUT if someone is taking pictures of your children in your yard, yeah, that's a reason to send someone out.
thanks for doing your job properly
Honestly, I'd just hang up.
@@major_kukri2430 too much liability in just hanging up. I could have been fired for hanging up on someone and not sending officers. And too often someone does call for what sounds like a ridiculous reason but it turns out to be a real emergency situation where they couldn't talk freely. I had to take every call seriously, even when I had the repeat callers.
@@elizabethcompton738 I get that, but you're not telling me that after the fifth call of a Karen reporting a black man for "walking suspiciously" that the idea of hanging up didn't cross your mind.
I can't stand that when officers are around civilians, they become bullies and make you feel that your knowledge or word doesn't mean anything. I'm glad to see videos like this. Although I'm always afraid to do this cuz I don't want to go to jail regardless if I'm in the right
I've seen more than once (on video) cops respond along the lines of "are you a lawyer?" when civilians try to protect their rights, as if the Constitution only applies to those who have gone to law school.
It’s difficult for regular citizens to challenge the cops, after all, not everyone is a lawyer or is informed about most of the rights.
@@1mol831 it shouldn’t be difficult but cops make it that way
@@Moohasha1 damn it's also great when you got a quick-witted auditor like Johnny 50 that will tell him he didn't know they're six months in the academy gave them a law degree
@@Moohasha1 it's also good when the morons try to say that the fifth amendment only applies if you've been arrested or committed a crime
I was with him on the other side of the building. He even credited me in his description with ‘pat of shame’. That being said he’s no longer filming in public. This guy was the absolute best for a small channel. I went filming for the very first time with this guy. He taught me a ton. He’s also a great dude.
I gave you a sub, in NJ also. I go out with jersey watcher
why isn’t this video on his page. police state new jersey. i will sub to your channel too.
@@garybleiberg9331 I barely film anymore but I appreciate it. He just got outta filming and set most to private about a year and a half ago
just subbed to jersey watcher too. thanks for the tip.
also subbed to brian b.
That poor officer, he just wanted to harass private citizens and go on with his day but he ran into someone who knew what the law actually is
This piece of garbage does this all day every day.
@@ScanManDaMurka he absolutely does
… and outranked him. If they were the same rank, it wouldn’t have ended there.
@@ScanManDaMurka I bet he waves the thin blue line flag all day and acts like an asshole 24/7
Nope
Trading for sovereign idiots
I’ve watched several of your videos and I complement you on the high quality of content, editing and overall production. I’ve noticed a theme with these auditors. They seem to be fishing for a conflict to record for their own YT channels. The police officers seem to take the bait and engage in a power struggle. The Sgt demonstrated the proper way to de escalate a situation.
😂😂😂”hope you learned something today”
Officer Moschella felt that in his soul.
He had to make a visit to the doctor because his ego just suffered a severe injury.
Yep 🤣
I love it when police officers say "you're not in any trouble but ..."
The minute you hear that, you know that the officer is not acting in good faith.
Last time an officer started a conversation like that with me, i replied.. you're trespassed from my property, get off it.
Ohh that cop's face looked like he was burned. Like it heart went into his stomach. The Sargent, was awesome. He didn't want to be petty, and he didn't seem to let his title go to his head.
We finally see a supervisor acting like a real supervisor and not automatically defending his officers. And Deputy Fife got a big Crow waiting on him at home
Yea but he’s still got the cop attitude. Went right into telling him what he can or can’t do. Barking orders like usual. That’s their problem.
@@moseskingofteabrews2021
Hmong opkihui got the l the z
Credit where it’s due. Sergeant Ruiz has a conscience built from knowledge and morals. What a fine example of an honourable and righteous man 👍🏻
As a now retired lawyer I have been asking myself, judges, and prosecutors for over 45 years, "Why can't the police obey the law? and, '' why don't the police know basic laws?". When I was a prosecutor I held a force wide, mandatory attendance, "Legal updates" seminar for my PD. I lasted there for 15 years.
Yeah it’s bad when police departments get RICO’d by the FBI New Jersey is known for corrupt police.
I still don't know why that isn't part of their training. How are you expected to uphold laws if you don't know them?
I can't decide if these officers are really stupid or arrogant. These auditors have been doing this for years now.
The officers have bodycams. EVERYBODY has camera phones.
Even if they probably won't have to face any meaningful consequences.
Don't they feel any shame?.
You sir are a legend. Thank you!
You're a rare prosecutor. I'd like to know, why is it more important to get a conviction rather then getting the right person or giving someone the correct charge?
If the cop already stated "you aren't in any trouble" then he clearly already concluded that the man was NOT engaged in "suspicious activity", and obviously wouldn't need his ID even if it was a stop & identify state. This boils down to the cop wanting to be obeyed, like usual. Whenever these types of cops start trying to argue with someone regarding rights, they either have no idea what a person's rights even are, or they just don't give a shit. A lot of times I think it's a mixture of both. They have an inkling of an idea what our rights are, but they don't give a shit to understand better, and they don't give a shit to respect the rights they are aware of. Our supposedly equal branches of government have gotten to where cops are somehow granted the most power & authority on a daily basis, with people's rights being violated in some shape or another on a literally daily basis. Of course this goes to their head. They also get away with lying in reports & in court all too often.
their attitude is upheld by politicians...it actually ties in with our current situation with cv19...they will have no problem beating us into submission over it.
It actually sucks because cops are entitled to lie to people they’re “investigating,” so him saying he’s “not in trouble” doesn’t actually end suspicion
In my opinion most cops know our rights and basic laws. The cops don't care and violate your rights easily because of their ego and they rarely get into trouble. Cops are used to people listening and obeying any order given.
Yeah but they can lie to you…he fully intended to try to make trouble for the guy.
@Ms. Kitty Katt in case you haven't noticed we're already under a fascist regime using the pandemic as reason and giving leo carte blanche to enforce it...and that's happening worldwide. Christians are not your enemy.
Officers misconduct should reflect on his next evaluation. He's incapable of deescalation and easily triggered. His misuse of "suspicious behavior" is his excuse to criminalize lawful acts.
Unfortunately that's up to not only the chain of command but the local police unions too.
You forgot to give the police sergeant a mark. He deserves an A+ for his professional stand and correcting his dumb colleague.
That Sargent showed exemplary leadership. And showed what that officer should have done in the first place.
Cop's should never be able to legally stop or detain anyone for any reason, other than breaking the law! I am not a free man if I must submit to a cop when I have never broken any law! The Constitution is Paramount, not unconstitutional law!
The problem is the courts pretend their opinion is based upon the constitution
But sometimes an investigation is needed to determine if a you broke a law and they should and do have the legal right to detain you while they are completing that investigation. The problem comes when there is no suspicion of a crime. Then you should not be detained.
@@mkhartnett Exactly. Cops can and SHOULD be able to detain you while investigating suspicion of a crime. Unfortunately, MANY police officers choose to investigate non-crimes, and choose NOT to investigate actual crimes. EDIT: And if their investigation of a crime doesn't pan out (ie, it's proven you didn't commit the crime they suspect you of) sometimes they'll continue to investigate to find out what crimes they can charge you for. Some cops are outstanding fishermen.
@@mkhartnett The vast majority of investigations can be performed by standing 30-50 feet away and observing for a minute or 2.
The two main problems is that some cops go on a power trip and are more interested in confonting people than promoting justice, and department policies require names of suspects on reports even when it is obvious the suspect did nothing wrong.
@Phuck RUclips in that case, they are looking for a specific person linked to a specific known crime. That's different than stopping someone on the suspicion of possible crime when they are not doing anything blatantly illegal.
This happens everyday. Record everything!
if only more 1s amendment auditors were like this guy and actually understood the 1st amendment
"In case something turns into something." This tyrant is a genius. Sadly, he's probably still a cop.
Is that not prior restraint? And also negates, innocent until proven guilty?
That was the most absurd statement the cop made. You hear this all the time from LEO's who don't know the law so they fabricate the most absurd situations, in case this turns into that which can become something else that can then be....blah, blah, blah.
That cop is so full of shit that it's coming out of his ears.
And still making $118,000
And that's a constant excuse they use, "in case something goes down."
“Lex Fridman is dangerous” 18 min inspirational video on RUclips ends w the poem “if” by R Kipling
Kudos to that sergeant. 👏🏻 I applaud him for knowing the citizen's rights.
The real issue with this type of interaction is that cops are pretty much universally taught to always try to ID everyone they encounter so that they can run them for warrants, reasonable suspicion be damned.
Well if people didn't always have warrants
@@garbageparade5144 bad analogy ID is worse then crack to cops
@@garbageparade5144 What a ridiculous thing to say. Only a tiny percentage of the population has warrants. But it wouldn't matter if that wasn't the case. The cops have no business sifting through the population, looking for things over which to bust people. It is outrageous. "Stop and frisk" and checkpoints are abominations to liberty. Trying to get everyone they encounter to identify themselves as happens in this video, and countless others, is right along that line.
You cannot convince me they are not under quotas.
@@slyjokerg Don't be so harsh on Garbage Parade. He's having so much fun, his mommy is letting him use her tablet today.
He needs to be fired ASAP
Not only was the sergeant professional but it's a step in cleaning up the image of the police department. Who out there says videotaping the police doesn't work?
Good cops want cameras. It shows the hard work they put in.
The interaction here happens very infrequently.... BUT the interactions the officers must deal with 1000's of times a day in this Country with the democrat voting filth is what need's to be "cleaned up" and thrown out. They continuously have to deal with the same criminal element because of the libturded policies and actions of the DA's and Judges who do not do their jobs.
@@simroc1289 So basically you're calling the Bill of Rights and the Constitution "A Libturd piece of filth"...I'm so ashamed that you actually try to politicize the inalienable rights provided to you by the State/Country for just being an obstacle to try to trample to usher us into a police/militarized citizen control system...Step outside of your box and take an impartial look at things, then form an "Educated" opinion....Apalling you are...
@@simroc1289 In 2019, a total of 2 NYPD officers were shot and killed in the line of duty. Both of them were killed by friendly fire. Police officers are so fucking good at killing people, they have a higher chance of being killed by a fellow officer than by someone they stop on the street.
@@simroc1289 Pretty sure it's republicans more often than not screaming that they're being oppressed and resisting arrest because they think laws dont apply to them because they bow down to the Tangerine Palpatine.
Demands ID from someone doing nothing illegal and then when asked for his ID refuses to give it. Wonderful
You would blame the officer for exercising his rights?
After doing something illegal...
@@lambdaman3228 when on duty he has to identify himself! Name and badge number.
@@miket1362 There is no law that says these officers must identify themselves on demand.
@@lambdaman3228 Actually yes there is, but hey nice try. Only time it is allowed is if the officer is a member of an undercover unit. A uniformed officer initiating contact with someone absolutely does have to identify themselves, in most states the first words out of the officers mouth is "Hello, I am officer blah blah blah with the blah police department. Reason for the stop is...".
Gotta love how most of these piggies start throwing out bogus charges when their authority is challenged.
All their ever wanting to do is exercise their "authority" over anyone they come into contact with.. it's a known fact that when you give someone the power to police over other people, they will naturally develop a prejudice against the person's they police
I bet that cop was fuming inside when the citizen said "Hope you learned something today.". 😂
This guy should be fired
I hope he did actually learn something. I'd rather that than him just fume. However... sounds like he has a history so maybe not.
When a cop argues and argues they know they're on shaky ground.
Exactly - I think this is the department fok up, if he was confident he was in the right, he would have arrested the auditor.
When the cop says “provide your documentation” it sends chills all over my body. That’s a slippery slope and the world has seen the horrible countries that do that.
Half the country is already for it to verify you've undergone a medical intervention with no long term effects understanding.
EU :(
Slippery slope??? We are deep into it already. Fools rushed their asses into “vaccination camps” to receive a dose (doses) of HIGHLY questionable juice and now are EAGER to “show their papers”.
@@deusvult6920 It's okay, you have no understanding of any medical science whatsoever anyway.
@@Abedeuss You just made a judgement of another based on zero evidence. You also reinforced and supported the actions of tyrants. The programming worked on you.
It should be law that they have to play those calls in a way that protects the callers identity because we all know about 80% of these calls don't exist.
It's hilarious how the police always say "You're making this more difficult than it has to be" while they are making it more difficult than it has to be 😆
Exactly the same sentence uttered by every rapist!
The kings of double talk
So much gas lighting
The quick lil "hope you learned somethin today" made me chuckle
I love when a supervisor steps in that actually knows the law. Pretty rare👍🏻
Too rare.
As is a street cop (Officer Belligerent inthis case) knowing - or giving a 💩 - about the law.
No business being a LEO.
I loved how he said..I hope you learned something
That officers face when his boss shot him down was the best!!!
I was rolling 🤣😂
😂 I backtracked it 😂
He received so much backlash that he damn near quit his job. His sergeant reprimanded him after this and literally said that if he would have placed him under arrest not only would have the department been sued but he would have lost his qualified immunity and his job.
@@leo29hornsfan can't believe that cop is still making over 6 figures smh
It’s rarely a training issue. It’s generally an “I don’t care, and I know I won’t be held accountable” problem. No amount of training will correct a character flaw. This officer has some major character flaws which are likely too prevalent to be overcome to a point that he could serve as an honorable peace officer with a genuine desire to serve the greater good of the community and work to prevent and serve as a seeker of justice on behalf of the citizens. Sadly, even some who are suited to do their duty are derailed by those at the top of the food chain who are too often concerned about their political motivations and pushing for statistics in order to receive more federal grant money…like needing x number o& ticket# and DWI arrests each month to make sure they get that federal highway money and they need to make so many drug possession an$ distribution cases in order to qualify for the ATF task force appointments, or they need however many violent crime stats in order to push the council for a budget increase and to hire more officers…expanding government…increasing power…more clout to push the agenda…and see to it that the department operates in an “equitable manner”…because some idiots still believe that policing is a social experiment and that diversity is our strength…
I disagree the mans clearly a dumb fuck. on top of that he never gets held accountable. It’s just a lose lose for the public.
@@cameronnorrkadork6073 thats what he said reread it. duh
the man's been a bully for a long time. that's why he became a cop.
Doesn’t everyone have character flaws.
Where are you getting this information about quotas for specific types of arrests or citations? Or why meeting these quotas is the way to access a higher spending budget, which will inevitably be spent on more officers so the department can grow larger and more powerful?
"this is within that degree."
"Yes, BUT..." Tf you mean "but" after you just agreed with him....
It means ignore everything I said before the word but.
But ... I have very low self-esteem, little regard for the law and a strong tendency towards authoritarianism.
@@ChrispyNut nailed it!👍😊
@@CrabbyO o
@@ChrispyNut can you train a police officer not to have a bad attitude I don't think so therefore this police officer should be fired immediately
That officer defied his own supervisor, in public, and refused to comply with his own department’s policies.
He should be on probation, and should always be accompanied by an officer Senior to him.
Agree. That was the most scary part for me.
This officer should be removed from interacting with the public before he causes a riot.
Yup. Then they skip town until the city is burned down.
Not a good fallback when that football career didn't pan out for him.
or a murder!
Just another ego from an officer that doesn't know the law he swore to uphold happens everyday.
I am believing more and more that they know the law, they are counting on civilians not knowing the law. When they come across someone who does know the law they don't know what to do, instead of admitting they was wrong, God forbid they do that, they just double down.
This is a great example of why(as I work in law enforcement myself) I love audit the audit, you guys are, as usual, spot on.
Thank you for knowing your job and respecting yourself and others. ATA is the only one of these channels I watch
Get a real job
@@scrotalfoliage720 Just bag my fries 🍟 guy! No time for politics, oh and light ice!
@@meachbeatsproductionsmbp2460 damn got everybody laughin
Well his actions are epidemic amongst police departments across the county, so I’d quit your day job and start doing workshops for all the academy trainings so the public is not harassed and you’d probably make a lot more money.
The look in his face when he took that “L”. 😂
I love the fact that this channel backs the facts with case law!
It's amazing actually. How this person digs thru all these statutes and case laws is sort of superhuman.
Sounds like Officer Moschella needs to learn the phrase: "Would you like to file a lawsuit with that?" Shouldn't be too difficult for him - lots of people with his level of training have learned to say a very similar phrase.
Yes Rod H, LOL! However, it is not the sub-par level of training, it is the embracing of a level of superior idiocy!
The line he SHOULD be using in his job is "would you like fries with that?"
It's the only thing he is qualified for
At some point in the cops life as a cop, he was trained how to do what he did. That pushes it higher up the chain of training.
I am more inclined to think he is the department fok up. 10:58 Notice the supervisor's glance, supervisor didn't ask the officer what the reasonable suspicion was, he just assumed the officer was wrong, and cut off the officer before he dug his hole deeper.
Yes he probley was taught this at some point but he knows it's contrary to the law . He saw his Sargent operate in a different and correct manner, he's seen the wrong way and the right way, he knows which is which so when he knowingly chooses the wrong way he by default exposes his true self
This cop is dangerous because he is what I call a justifier. He does what he wants, he is driven by his ego and he justifies anything he does no matter how ridiculous his justifications are. In the end his ego was controlling him to the point where he refused to admit he was wrong and even contradicted his supervisor right in front oh him. I was married to a person with this personality trait and I can tell you this cop is dangerous.
HAHAHA!! Technically speaking, he did NOT lie about always having ID. Fingerprints, retinas, or even his face (facial recognition) technically speaking IS a form of identification. I love it. I’m going to use this.
Don't forget deoxyribonucleic acid as well (DNA)
@@grahamto8181 lmao yes exactly. I would love to watch this play out in court. The look on the cops face when he realizes that technically the guy was telling the truth because of those examples above haha cop is too stupid to wrap his head around this concept
@@grahamto8181
lol that is not easy to pronounce at all. I swear the cop will constitute those words as an imminent chemical attack threat
@Future Pants you do realize no one was discussing the statistical reality of what percentage of Americans have the savings to pursue court cases like these, right? We were joking around about this guy playing on words and how the cop was too stupid to understand. Good job ruining the joke👍🏽
I love that you explain the laws in these videos. Thank you for helping to educate us and provide us with the means to protect our own rights! 👏🏼
The way he said “sure sarge!” when the sgt asked him if he’s clear 😂😂
No amount of time nor training can ever change or correct that officer’s deficiencies.. I agree he’s a danger to the public and himself… he should be relieved of active duty before he kill someone.
Exactly
People like this officer shouldn't be at a job where he interacts with people
@@guynew8501
Much less armed!🤦♂️
...and he will only get worse - each time he gets away with a transgression, it reinforces that there are no consequences to his actions.
Get his family to counseling! The demeanor on the job goes home to the family. LEOs are practicing dominance 24/7/365, especially at home under a cone of silence.
People like him are why we saw off the corners of donuts, for officer safety. They used to be square.