I'm surprised judge didnt call out the couple for their bold face lie about getting ONE drink from the bottle of his favorite drink... then later admitting it was 3-4 drinks (which might still be a lie). Makes me believe the guy when he said he personally served the wife her favorite drink. They're dishonest.
I think JM felt regardless if the husband drunk 1-4 cups of his favorite bottle or gave the wife a drink the company still ran out of all the liquor for 142 guests which was less than the estimated amount of 175 he should’ve never ran out of liquor or cups at all.
I had 100 guests at my wedding, unlimited soda, water, beer, wine, whiskey, and vodka. I paid $500 for bar service, but provided all the liquor for less than $1000. Shopped at Costco 😂. It can be done. I promise 😊
You are smart though! They asked this guy to provide the booze and you know he doesn’t Costco!😂 for the list they asked for… depending on how many bottles of each- like 10 grand minimum and then tips on top if you want to be served over and over
Did no one else peep the wife claiming her husband was only able to have one glass of his whiskey and when he went back for a second it was out, then he said he had 4 glasses later? 😂
Yeah that’s what I was thinking too!! So what?, plaintiff has to be liquored up before she can enjoy herself at anything?? (Sounds like a drinking issue to me!!)
They paid this man 5k to have liquor for a special occasion that doesn't happen everyday.Thats the point not they couldn't enjoy themselves without liquor.They even had less people show up then anticipated.Open bar should last according to contract.
Take advantage? They were short 33 people, he wasn't giving away bottles.. .. if 30 minutes after the event started, he didn't have one of the cheaper drinks he showed up short handed
I agree and also have the plaintiffs or customers prior to the start of the event ( on-site) in writing that have everything requested per their contract.
The wife said her husband only had one drink. The husband admitted he had about 3-4. From the time he said that, they lost all credibility. I would not award them anything.
The defendant should’ve definitely been overprepared. Basically bring a whole liquor store in a van. Use what you need to, keep receipts, if you need to return things, or, just stock it up for your next party, as you are a professional, bartending company.
bars are known for watering drinks down and this defendant probably gave full strength drinks to people and now he basically did it all for free with this unfair verdict . plaintiffs are scammers .
😂😂omg I'm married 23 yrs this yr and we don't bother celebrating it's just a waste of money we celebrate it with our kids my brother and uncle as a family of 8
It's silly to claim that the party was bad because there was not enough alcohol. The mentality of needing alcohol to have fun and enjoy oneself is why we have a drinking problem in the U.S.
@@elvickRULESexactly, they just interested in impressing their friends with a big party, the same so called friends that drink them out and complain they didn't get enough 😅
For people who probably don’t even like them. They just wanted to get hammered. Who goes to a party demanding liquor brands? “I’m not coming unless I can have my Bombay and Bacardi.” 😂😆🤣
@@ggrij2004 dang! I've been wanting to go out west to snowboard!!! I booked 2 nights in a chalet in the Austrian Alps for only $500 for myself! I really recommend Europe for snow sports 😁 the most expensive part is the flight, the rest is reasonable 🤙🏻
The fact that she said, the party was bad bc they didnt have liquor, shows that they dont know how to REALLY have fun. Ive been to parties where i didnt have a drink and I HAD A TIME!!!!
You don't need to be rich if you start two lawsuits after the party to claim back the money you spent. Anyone who wants to show off can do it. That is what has happened here. One side is lying and I think it is the plaintiffs. Notice how they said he didn't get his favourite drink and then was later forced to admit that he actually had three or four. If they will lie about that what else are they lying about. JM was being ridiculous when she said that there was testimony from three people. Those people being the plaintiff, her husband and the mother. Of course they are going to corroborate each other's stories.
At 175 guests, 5K is only $28 per guest. That's not that a crazy extravagant amount. Personally, I think the company should have charged more for unlimited drinks for that size of a party---their mistake. The ruling is fair here because only 142 guests showed up. The company would have been even more screwed had all 175 guests showed up.
@@newsflash7609 Yeah, if you account for 4 bartender and owner, Transportation cost and profit margin build into the 5k price. you would be looking at less than $20 per guest. The company severely underquote the price given what type of event this is. he underestimate the alcohol consumption the guest would consume.
I believe the defendant. The plaintiff was caught in too many non-truths. I would have gave her back maybe $800 at most. But I believe him when he say they were drinking like fish.
EXACTLY. That mess is made it Louisville, Kentucky and has “frontier whiskey ” on the bottle. The bottle should be shaped like a bullet or have literal bullets inside. They might as well have asked for moonshine or hooch. 😂😆🤣
If people drink repeatedly since it was free, it could run out quickly. But what they received was a bargain! For the defendant, pictures of the bottles of alcohol would have helped him win the case.
I've never been a drinker or to parties like that but wouldn't they keep count of how many drinks they served, how many bottles they went through, and when they ran out? I would think a business would do so for their own records.
As a Bartender $5k for 142 guest is not a lot. Top shelf brands are very expensive, unless he's a contract with ABC for discounted price. Not to mention if people are heavy drinkers. I've seen ppl throw them back especially when the bar is open.
Not mention that the couple should have called out their preferences in advance. From experience I don’t believe he ran out of liquor. I feel like he ran out of only the 2 that everyone drank like fish (Ciroc and Bulliet). Also when he started serving 30 minutes early, he should have told them that last call would be 30 minutes earlier. He had the right intentions but definitely should bring a liquor inventory sheet pre party and do one at the end. That would have told the true story. Because even the husband’s story changed from he had only 1 drink to 3-4, like wait a minute?!?!
OMG my ears every time she sais Bou-li-ay. It's BULLET!! "They liked the name 'bullet' but knew that wouldn't fly, so they were developing a product called 'Bullitt,' after Bullitt County, Kentucky. (Pronounced like the ammunition.) Then somebody told them about Bulleit (also pronounced that way) so, like any big company would, they made Tommy an offer he couldn't refuse".
I feel that the guest started drinking as soon as they arrived, and the defendant also didn’t have enough alcohol. I also feel the husband drank more than he led on.
Did she mean Bulliet? She’s upset that her party failed and the a/c was out, but she’s taking it out on the bartender. I find it hard to believe she didn’t drink anything because he didn’t have Ciroc. The entire case is sketchy
Not sure this is a correct verdict. She didn’t listen to the defendant. When the plaintiff says that they couldn’t have a good time at the party tells me that they are all big drinkers. Enough said.
The plaintiffs are sketchy. I believe the defendant that there was enough alcohol. Maybe some ran out. Deal wifh it. Drink something else. If it is free then deal with it. How can the accounts differ so much? He made out he didn't get his favourite drink and then next minute he admitted to having three or four. One side says the cups ran out at 21.00, the other 23.15. Someone is telling porkies and I think it is the plaintiffs. My impression is that they wanted to show off by having a big party and then afterwards start a bunch of lawsuits to reclaim the money. We know they have a lawsuit against the venue for the A/C not working. I don't trust them.
How is the defendant going to say he gave the plaintiff her drink and she says she didn't get any? That seems very odd....not sure why either would lie?
And the husband first said he only got one drink and later in his testimony he said three, I didn't believe anything else he and his wife said after that.
The fact that the defendant ran out of *CUPS* tells me he didn't plan properly. Even assuming he served water to 40 guests for 1/2 hour....there is no way he should've run out of plastic cups. And if the defendant really did have the Bulleit bourbon and Ciroc vodka then he would have just had it unloaded from the cargo van instead of immediately going to a store before searching the van. Remember, he claims he got there early....so both alcohols should've been available and pouring by party time.
Let me guess. You've never worked a catering service or bartenders for an open bar.... your theory may be sufficient, but you likely lack ANY experience.
Can't believe the defendant STILL thinks he had enough liquor when he was talking to Doug. Just admit you messed up, and move on. If you are in that business you have to MAKE SURE you have everything you need, and that you have plans in place for anything that could happen (like running out of liquor). Do better!
The contract should also specify how many bottles of each liquor. I can't help if the crowd is full of alcoholics. At the end of the day, it should say how many drinks you can serve off each liquor, using variables that include if they're drinking rocks pours vs singles. And if they say that's not enough, amend the contract. I work in the service industry, and this is why it's so important to outline specifics, especially if you're telling them they won't run out of alcohol.
These prices are DIRT cheap. The vendor is not even getting $30 per head. And, the plaintiff is asking for about ten premium liquor brands. “Limited open bar: $20 to $25 per head. Full open bar: $35 to $45 per head.” It’s funny the defendant didn’t provide a receipt from his supplier to show that what was ordered is what was delivered. The plaintiff sounds extra. First, a thirteenth anniversary party is nonsensical. It’s doomed from the start. Was the party on a Friday the 13th too? The plaintiff must have a lot of alcoholic friends. It’s kind of funny to hear the aunt talking about “seeing more bottles at weddings”. I’ve never literally counted the bottles on hand when being served. That’s interesting. It’s also comical she is suing the venue. I guess they are taking God to small claims court for the weather too. These folks sound fancy with the “bullet” bourbon, bougie pronounciation of said bourbon, food truck, dressing rooms, and multiple lawsuits for the same party.
Well maybe there was a lot less DRUNK DRIVERS on the road that night! Considering there was 175 people who would be driving intoxicated that night , I’m glad they ran out of liquor.
If you need that much alcohol to make a party, good, you either have terrible friends and family, or, you’re just terrible people. What an awful case. The plaintiff should be ashamed of themselves.
Some families have waaaay more drinkers than others. Add a free bar to that and you'll be finding 1/2 full drinks all over the tables! I could never have a free bar with my family omg.
Harvey should have called this case "Liquor?! He hardly KNEW her!" Would've actually worked, for once!
For real! He uses that line way too much and it's annoying. Lol
Right!!!😂😂😂
😂😂😂
😂😂😂it cracks me up everytimeeee
😂😂😂😂
I'm surprised judge didnt call out the couple for their bold face lie about getting ONE drink from the bottle of his favorite drink... then later admitting it was 3-4 drinks (which might still be a lie). Makes me believe the guy when he said he personally served the wife her favorite drink. They're dishonest.
Thank you! I don't know how so many other people didn't catch that.
I think JM felt regardless if the husband drunk 1-4 cups of his favorite bottle or gave the wife a drink the company still ran out of all the liquor for 142 guests which was less than the estimated amount of 175 he should’ve never ran out of liquor or cups at all.
I agree.
wrong, jessewilson-music.....
@@projectionv.accountability1010I heard it, and I was in the shower lol
142 guest with unlimited drinks and you only charge $5,000. They will go out of business quick. 😂😂
Exactly
That what I said 😂
I had 100 guests at my wedding, unlimited soda, water, beer, wine, whiskey, and vodka. I paid $500 for bar service, but provided all the liquor for less than $1000. Shopped at Costco 😂. It can be done. I promise 😊
You are smart though! They asked this guy to provide the booze and you know he doesn’t Costco!😂 for the list they asked for… depending on how many bottles of each- like 10 grand minimum and then tips on top if you want to be served over and over
175 guests !!
"You tall drink of water, you!" Keep it together, Judge Marilyn 😆
Judge was flirting with him lol 😂
*Judge Milian
Yes that includes your legs too, judge!😂
lol 😂
Getting flirty with someone husband 😮
Did no one else peep the wife claiming her husband was only able to have one glass of his whiskey and when he went back for a second it was out, then he said he had 4 glasses later? 😂
Yup 😂
Yup and she was totally full of bs when she said she didn’t get a single drink.
Yeah they are liars!
Yup, and for that reason I definitely believed the bartender when he said he served her as well.
She looked at her husband like "That is NOT what I told u to say!" 😂
No being able to have a good time without alcohol is just sad.
But they paidddd lol
Totally agree I personally do not drink, but when I go to functions I always have a good time.
Yeah that’s what I was thinking too!! So what?, plaintiff has to be liquored up before she can enjoy herself at anything?? (Sounds like a drinking issue to me!!)
AGREED, I don't drink either, as long as it's some good music going I'm good!
They paid this man 5k to have liquor for a special occasion that doesn't happen everyday.Thats the point not they couldn't enjoy themselves without liquor.They even had less people show up then anticipated.Open bar should last according to contract.
Tbh when it's open bar, guest will take advantage.
But also, the business owner should've been a bit more prepared.
When u dealing with Alcoholic..!! You can’t Please Them All..!!!
Take advantage? They were short 33 people, he wasn't giving away bottles.. .. if 30 minutes after the event started, he didn't have one of the cheaper drinks he showed up short handed
I would have some liquor but I would always make my events BYOB
It sounds like they wanted a free party. Since they are also suing the venue
Was looking for this comment before posting it myself. I mean coincidences do happen, however I doubt that's the case here.
I agree. The judge should of ask who else they were suing
guy should have had a detailed inventory of what he brought with him.
and maybe take photos of the inventory at the site
Exactly, especially when there are specific requests.
Before and after pics, too, since he said they didn't run out as the plaintiffs claimed. Bet he started doing this going forward.
My thoughts exactly! 🙌🏾
He’ll probably do that from now on 😂
I agree and also have the plaintiffs or customers prior to the start of the event ( on-site) in writing that have everything requested per their contract.
Plantiff lying out her teeth... 😂😂😂
I do think at least SOME of the 'disappointed' 140 odd people might have testified, eh?🤔😁
It’s lying THROUGH her teeth 😂
🤥
The wife said her husband only had one drink. The husband admitted he had about 3-4. From the time he said that, they lost all credibility. I would not award them anything.
If your party was ruined because guests had to drink booze that was not their first choice, then your friends are a bunch of losers.
Exactly
Right! Like, where’s the sense of celebration??
Right. Hell, I don't like Beer but I'll drink one if that's all they have. 🤷
Exactly. When it’s free Shit ppl come n drink
Maybe they weren’t that upset and they just want the 5k back so they’re milking it
5k is not enough he not only had to buy alcohol, juice, water, fruit and pay himself and 4 other people and for an open bar NOPE
5k is more than enough
The defendant should’ve definitely been overprepared. Basically bring a whole liquor store in a van. Use what you need to, keep receipts, if you need to return things, or, just stock it up for your next party, as you are a professional, bartending company.
I at least expected him to bring receipts of drinks he brought around the same time and the cheques to pay 4 bartenders.... 1/3 of money back is crazy
@@Ms_O this judge is many times unfair
He was paid $5,000, which I assume was ahead of time. Companies always want up front cash. Plaintiffs got what they paid for.
Let me tell you, a 13th anniversary isn’t special enough for me to spend $5,000 getting other people drunk for a few hours.
$5000 worth of drinking?!?!?
bars are known for watering drinks down and this defendant probably gave full strength drinks to people and now he basically did it all for free with this unfair verdict . plaintiffs are scammers .
@@marleonetti7 shouldn't be have come in with an inventory of what he purchased for the event?
I think that would have done a long way.
😂😂omg I'm married 23 yrs this yr and we don't bother celebrating it's just a waste of money we celebrate it with our kids my brother and uncle as a family of 8
All that money saved was used for our kids college fees😂
I really hope she isn’t referring to Bulliet Bourbon as “bull-ee-ay” because it’s literally just pronounced “bullet”. 😂😂
I will never forget how she really did tho ! 😂😂
Ok. Because she is really annoying me.
Came to say this!
It's silly to claim that the party was bad because there was not enough alcohol. The mentality of needing alcohol to have fun and enjoy oneself is why we have a drinking problem in the U.S.
Alcohol and heat don’t mix!!!🫣😵💫
What about water?? lol!
@@barbarapaton4005the only clear liquid was the alcohol 😂
😂😂😂
They lied and the judge didn’t even throw the case out on the basis of lying under oath
They could have had a romantic weekend somewhere special for less than they spent on this party.
They could have had a romantic WEEK somewhere for what they spent on liquor alone.
People wasting money on flexing at a party instead of just travel together and see the world 🤷♂️weird
@@elvickRULESexactly, they just interested in impressing their friends with a big party, the same so called friends that drink them out and complain they didn't get enough 😅
For people who probably don’t even like them. They just wanted to get hammered.
Who goes to a party demanding liquor brands?
“I’m not coming unless I can have my Bombay and Bacardi.”
😂😆🤣
He wasn't prepared at all. The fact they invited 175 but we're short about 50ppl that liquor should have lasted
if you can only have a good time when alcohol is involved, you must be really boring sober😭.
In the words of Judge Judy... " You ate the steak".😊
But it wasn't cooked like I wanted and I had to eat it anyway. 😂
JJ for the win here 😂
😂😂😂😂
Yes 😂
But if it’s Bobby Flay cousin cooking it…😂
The fact that he accommodated the no a.c. situation should have been considered
$5000 for drinks?!!!!!! DANG 😅 I'm happy I do not drink nor do I party. I'd spend 5 grand on a packback trip across Europe
5 grand ain’t nothing! Took my family out to lake tahoe for 3 nights with a air bnb including snowmobiling and snowboarding and bang 5 grand!
@@ggrij2004 dang! I've been wanting to go out west to snowboard!!! I booked 2 nights in a chalet in the Austrian Alps for only $500 for myself! I really recommend Europe for snow sports 😁 the most expensive part is the flight, the rest is reasonable 🤙🏻
5k wasn't just for the alcohol
@@ggrij2004do you have your own house?
@@TopherGrantyes in daly city! One of the most affordable cities in san mateo county! Where it still came in a frigid 625k back in 2011
The fact that she said, the party was bad bc they didnt have liquor, shows that they dont know how to REALLY have fun. Ive been to parties where i didnt have a drink and I HAD A TIME!!!!
Bruh how rich you gotta be to have over 100 people at your 13th anniversary. With an open bar and a “dressing room”
You don't need to be rich if you start two lawsuits after the party to claim back the money you spent. Anyone who wants to show off can do it. That is what has happened here. One side is lying and I think it is the plaintiffs. Notice how they said he didn't get his favourite drink and then was later forced to admit that he actually had three or four. If they will lie about that what else are they lying about. JM was being ridiculous when she said that there was testimony from three people. Those people being the plaintiff, her husband and the mother. Of course they are going to corroborate each other's stories.
@@stephenbanks5952 Totally agree with you.
My brother’s mother. That sort of says it all.
For 5k I agree you should not run out of alcohol PeriodT that’s what your paying for !!
At 175 guests, 5K is only $28 per guest. That's not that a crazy extravagant amount. Personally, I think the company should have charged more for unlimited drinks for that size of a party---their mistake. The ruling is fair here because only 142 guests showed up. The company would have been even more screwed had all 175 guests showed up.
Huh?? I don't even drink and I know $5k is not that much money for a huge group.
@@newsflash7609 Yeah, if you account for 4 bartender and owner, Transportation cost and profit margin build into the 5k price. you would be looking at less than $20 per guest. The company severely underquote the price given what type of event this is. he underestimate the alcohol consumption the guest would consume.
Also for the service of the bartenders, setup, breakdown, and himself as overseer of the event
Nah, you trippin. Over 170 guests, open bar? That’s $10,000 MINIMUM.
142 people for a 13th wedding anniversary? Wtf 😂😂
I believe the defendant. The plaintiff was caught in too many non-truths. I would have gave her back maybe $800 at most. But I believe him when he say they were drinking like fish.
It's pronounced BULLET! It urked me every time they pronounced it the "fancy" way when its not even pronounced like that! 🤦🏼♀️
EXACTLY. That mess is made it Louisville, Kentucky and has “frontier whiskey ” on the bottle. The bottle should be shaped like a bullet or have literal bullets inside.
They might as well have asked for moonshine or hooch.
😂😆🤣
H00d validation to impress people from H00d
Husband definitely had that 1.5 bottles. lol. “One drink, 2 maybe three. Three or four.”
The plaintiff flat out lied a few times.
I believe the defendant.
If people drink repeatedly since it was free, it could run out quickly. But what they received was a bargain! For the defendant, pictures of the bottles of alcohol would have helped him win the case.
I can’t believe the way drinking ALCOHOL is being praised and awarded in court. Just sad.
Should have been handing out water to the hot early people. Alcohol dehydrates you. Makes you drink more.
13th wedding anniversary party? Thats a thing?
Sounds like she’s gonna have a 14th year anniversary party too once she collects all her coins. It’s an annual routine.
Paying 5 k should have been enough alcohol to last the whole night
The whole week lol
@@Derriayers lol fr
That also includes paying bartenders
What about the juice, soda, water, plates, cups, napkins and ice, plus 4 bartenders?!? 142+2 people, I don’t think that 5k is enough!
Not for 175 guests! 😂😂😂💀
Totally wrong response from the judge. These people shouldn’t have gotten a dollar back.
I've never been a drinker or to parties like that but wouldn't they keep count of how many drinks they served, how many bottles they went through, and when they ran out? I would think a business would do so for their own records.
I would have issued tickets! Alcohol, non-Alcohol, and Water
That should have been at least 10,000 contract 5,000 is for sure not enough to provide liquor all that time for 175 people
THAT WAS A FAIR JUDGEMENT.
good movie
Wow that it is a big bill for a 13 year anniversary
Without specific types of alcohol, the party was ruined? Maybe work on your priorities a bit.
As a Bartender $5k for 142 guest is not a lot. Top shelf brands are very expensive, unless he's a contract with ABC for discounted price. Not to mention if people are heavy drinkers. I've seen ppl throw them back especially when the bar is open.
Not mention that the couple should have called out their preferences in advance. From experience I don’t believe he ran out of liquor. I feel like he ran out of only the 2 that everyone drank like fish (Ciroc and Bulliet). Also when he started serving 30 minutes early, he should have told them that last call would be 30 minutes earlier. He had the right intentions but definitely should bring a liquor inventory sheet pre party and do one at the end. That would have told the true story. Because even the husband’s story changed from he had only 1 drink to 3-4, like wait a minute?!?!
OMG my ears every time she sais Bou-li-ay. It's BULLET!!
"They liked the name 'bullet' but knew that wouldn't fly, so they were developing a product called 'Bullitt,' after Bullitt County, Kentucky. (Pronounced like the ammunition.) Then somebody told them about Bulleit (also pronounced that way) so, like any big company would, they made Tommy an offer he couldn't refuse".
I feel that the guest started drinking as soon as they arrived, and the defendant also didn’t have enough alcohol. I also feel the husband drank more than he led on.
Lovely Couple. I am proud of both sides. They conducted themselves with class!
Did she mean Bulliet? She’s upset that her party failed and the a/c was out, but she’s taking it out on the bartender. I find it hard to believe she didn’t drink anything because he didn’t have Ciroc. The entire case is sketchy
All over alcohol, lol. So glad I don't drink.
13th wedding anniversary has 175 guests and husband went down to "her dressing room". Is it just me or does that sound completely OTT?
It's pronounced: Bullit Bourbon as if there isn't an "e" in the word.
Defendant should show receipts of his purchased liquor. Judge usually always asks for receipts, surprised she never confirmed purchases.
Yes!
I was about to ask the same thing
Nah. It's his business. He wouldn't just go to the liquor store and buy for that party. He orders in bulk for many parties under his liquor license
I was listening in the shower yelling where's the receipt???!!!
I would have like to see his liquor list for that many guest to make the determination whether he purchased enough or not
I really like how poised and articulate both the plaintiff and defendant are. 💕
JM got this one way wrong.
Ruined the party? Girl sue yourself for being boring then. 🙄
😂😂😂😂 right smh haha this world cray
$1300 is way too much.
Not sure this is a correct verdict. She didn’t listen to the defendant. When the plaintiff says that they couldn’t have a good time at the party tells me that they are all big drinkers. Enough said.
lol. WHO invites 175 people to a 13th wedding anniversary party!?!? lmao
People married for 13 years. It’s their money why you mad?
The plaintiffs.
I would that was a lot of money they spent on liquor and food
@@JC-cm9bnHow do you know they’re Section 8 recipients or are you a racist?
exactly
I can confirm liquor is the main ingredient of a good party
The plaintiffs are sketchy. I believe the defendant that there was enough alcohol. Maybe some ran out. Deal wifh it. Drink something else. If it is free then deal with it. How can the accounts differ so much? He made out he didn't get his favourite drink and then next minute he admitted to having three or four. One side says the cups ran out at 21.00, the other 23.15. Someone is telling porkies and I think it is the plaintiffs. My impression is that they wanted to show off by having a big party and then afterwards start a bunch of lawsuits to reclaim the money. We know they have a lawsuit against the venue for the A/C not working. I don't trust them.
The issue is whether you must have “certain liquor” and not just “enough liquor”. They sound like alcohol snobs.
How is the defendant going to say he gave the plaintiff her drink and she says she didn't get any? That seems very odd....not sure why either would lie?
And the husband first said he only got one drink and later in his testimony he said three, I didn't believe anything else he and his wife said after that.
Finally someone who’s well spoken
Doug is going to get his digs in every single time 😂
He could have proved his innocence with math and receipts 😂
"Bullyaaa" LMAO it's pronounced bullet 🤦♂️
Came to say the same thing! Lol
Yes! I cringed every time she said it 😂
I know, I’m like what??!! You know NOTHING about Bourbon
They try to be bouji
The fact that the defendant ran out of *CUPS* tells me he didn't plan properly. Even assuming he served water to 40 guests for 1/2 hour....there is no way he should've run out of plastic cups. And if the defendant really did have the Bulleit bourbon and Ciroc vodka then he would have just had it unloaded from the cargo van instead of immediately going to a store before searching the van. Remember, he claims he got there early....so both alcohols should've been available and pouring by party time.
Let me guess. You've never worked a catering service or bartenders for an open bar.... your theory may be sufficient, but you likely lack ANY experience.
😂😂😂 i was thinking that haha some folks just don't understand the food and beverage industry @@TopherGrant
@momoni368 they never do
It is desperate and pretentious to have such a big party for only 13 years.
Lolz
Totally!!! I wonder if they have that kind of party every year? 😂
Why are people so addicted to alcohol, if your party isn't fun without alcohol, then your party wasn't fun...
The moment you feel too bougie to say vodka 😅
"Bullet" is fine
It is actually pronounced "bullet" like the ammo.
It’s pronounced “bullet” bourbon - I cringed every time she said “bully-ay” like it’s a fancy French brand 😂
If they are running out of alcohol mid way thro a party..you have a drinking issue
It’s “bou-ley”!!!
I just don’t understand why some of these issues weren’t resolved by silencing one of the employees or himself to the store:
Thank god I don’t drink alcohol
Anymore 😂😂😂
😂😂😂
I’m trying to figure out why they were drinking alcohol inside a hot building.. I’m feeling sick just thinking about it
Exactly!!! And alcohol just makes you thirstier. They should’ve been drinking water😂😂
@@cflournoy1529 that’s why the alcohol left so fast because of the sweat and thirst lol
@@TruckerWitDaHeater a bunch of sweaty drunks. Wish I could’ve been a fly on the wall.😂😂
right??? I would have been throwing up at her fancy 13th wedding anniversary, sauna party, lol.
He should of had them prepay for a certain amount of bottles per brand and then have them be able to return the unused for credit.
She should just have her Anniversary at a Bar. Lol. More like a liquor party. 😂
Can't believe the defendant STILL thinks he had enough liquor when he was talking to Doug. Just admit you messed up, and move on. If you are in that business you have to MAKE SURE you have everything you need, and that you have plans in place for anything that could happen (like running out of liquor). Do better!
The plaintiffs clearly lied…… sometimes when people know they are honest they won’t sit there and fold.
The contract should also specify how many bottles of each liquor. I can't help if the crowd is full of alcoholics. At the end of the day, it should say how many drinks you can serve off each liquor, using variables that include if they're drinking rocks pours vs singles. And if they say that's not enough, amend the contract. I work in the service industry, and this is why it's so important to outline specifics, especially if you're telling them they won't run out of alcohol.
5000.00 is not enough for that party size.
I'm sitting here trying to figure out what is boolay. And when the defendant said whisky I was like oh she means bulleit bourbon pronounced bullet.
No, they weren’t doing that, where are they? They are trying to be bougie. They are not. They’re just losers.
@@HHH-ye1ro Bougie is exactly what they are trying to be. They just look stupid.
I'm watching this again and it's driving me nuts every time she says boolay.
They're liars and that dress makes her look pregnant.
Running out of cups is insane 😅
There's something mentally wrong with you if you can't have a fun at a party without alcohol.
Just because she wanna get drunk.
And dude stole my damn name!
These prices are DIRT cheap. The vendor is not even getting $30 per head. And, the plaintiff is asking for about ten premium liquor brands.
“Limited open bar: $20 to $25 per head. Full open bar: $35 to $45 per head.”
It’s funny the defendant didn’t provide a receipt from his supplier to show that what was ordered is what was delivered.
The plaintiff sounds extra. First, a thirteenth anniversary party is nonsensical. It’s doomed from the start. Was the party on a Friday the 13th too?
The plaintiff must have a lot of alcoholic friends. It’s kind of funny to hear the aunt talking about “seeing more bottles at weddings”. I’ve never literally counted the bottles on hand when being served. That’s interesting.
It’s also comical she is suing the venue. I guess they are taking God to small claims court for the weather too.
These folks sound fancy with the “bullet” bourbon, bougie pronounciation of said bourbon, food truck, dressing rooms, and multiple lawsuits for the same party.
Well maybe there was a lot less DRUNK DRIVERS on the road that night! Considering there was 175 people who would be driving intoxicated that night , I’m glad they ran out of liquor.
How about skipping the "way above and beyond", and just serve the booze!
If you need that much alcohol to make a party, good, you either have terrible friends and family, or, you’re just terrible people. What an awful case. The plaintiff should be ashamed of themselves.
Judge listening to the plaintiff talk about not having their preferred brand of liquor 😂
Some families have waaaay more drinkers than others. Add a free bar to that and you'll be finding 1/2 full drinks all over the tables! I could never have a free bar with my family omg.
Yep. At least do, what we call in Canada here, a toonie bar. Two bucks a drink.
@@justinturner8278 I'm in Canada too and it's been a while since I've seen toonie bars lol!
@@Uniquemum73 probably. I haven’t had a drink in almost 12 years, so I don’t really pay attention anymore.
I am a rep for Bulliet and they are botching up the name of it so bad. LOL. Make it sound so fancy. Maybe this is why the bartender was so confused HA
They made some crappy alcohol choices for $5000.
I wonder if he had the right amount of liquor but over poured