There is no way Tom Henderson has been leaking every single BF release content since BF3 and hasn't been fired or cut his connections. I would bet money that DICE is paying him to do the breadcrumbs to 'excite' the community
It wouldn't be the true iteration of the game if they ever did remaster it. It would be riddled with micro transactions for stupid skins etc. We'll never see the true game again.
@@zzznardszzz4715 Nah, Remaster Bad Company 1 and 2. Not even for the multiplayer. Give us those campaigns again. I lost my xbox 360. I can't play Bad Company's campaign anymore.
Ironically, I think it's actually commendable that DICE keeps trying something new, and that's something that I wish we could be praising the larger entertainment industry on, rather than having to watch them waste years and millions on production of the same things over and over.
they simply do not listen. BFV, 2042. They don't care about players, just jumping on trends or PC ideals. No one wants Firestorm. No one wants your take on other games. We want a good BF game.
@@joewallace9030 Methinx Joey here is just *_really_* into his grizzled, buff, 5 o'clock shadow, experienced older white guys. Can't get enough of them.
Biggest thing for me is the ability to turn crossplay off AND find populated servers. Oh, and a server browser, so when I back out of a server because of the map or mode (I like BF3 and BC2 modes the best) I'm not thrown into the exact same server instance. But I know I'm dreaming and it's because of the low player count I keep getting put into the exact same server.
I doubt they will ever bring back server browser. All companies are using some form of SBMM, or EOMM these days. Basically the software can live nerf/boost you depending on how you play. And will put you in servers based on how you’re playing. It’s not about making a better experience for you, it’s about increasing the odds of you spending money on skins, models etc. And it works very well apparently.
@@bertgummer8125 I know it's not going to happen. It's funny, in BF3/BF4 when Battlelog came out everybody hated it at first (launch a browser to find a game). But that gave us the most agency over our games and I bet we'll never see anything like it again. You could pick your game mode, map, and see the score, how many tickets left, and even who was on each team and their current k/d during the game. Now companies only add features if it makes them more money.
Limit to 64 players seems a bit disappointing to me I'd like to have the option to have larger games if they're balanced correctly. It doesn't have to be a full 128 but 64 does feel pretty small at this point.
@@PaulCrosby-d5p PS2 is far from dead. It's 12 years old and still gets new content releases and has a far more loyal and recurring fan base than this game will ever have. They're still doing it right after all this time, else players wouldn't be remotely as dedicated as they are to it.
Doesn't matter how many studios they throw at it - that just spells too many cooks. Also, they already did the whole influencer playtesting thing (their "gamechangers" or whatever it was they called them) for BFV, and that didn't help at all. What they need is a _clear, unitary vision_ that they stick to _and follow through to the end._ They can't give up a year in because things aren't working out, and the first step to getting there is to _not_ listen to the vocal minority (aka influencers). A majority of their players are "casual" and that should be seen as their target demographic, and they won't reach them by pandering to "selected" players, especially youtubers and twitchers, nor will they reach them by copying what other games do. They need to realize that they are something rather unique - and that they already know it.
Remember: They launched 2042 WITHOUT A SCOREBOARD. THAT"S how incompetent these devs were. It took 5 months to get that. It was a painful year and never again. The next BF has to blow me away before i even consider spending a dime on another EA game.
bro i was playing some bf3 last night and on the loading screen for Caspian Border it said "the scoreboard is always available to see during a match" i laughed so hard.
What would be cool is if they added "official" servers back to portal. Waiting forever only to be kicked out because of player thresholds not being met wastes 30min easy. If people could see the player count in advance they would join so games stayed persistent instead of join, wait, wait again, be kicked back to menu, join wait again. Beyond frustrating.
Back to basics is good with me. A respawn system that makes it easier to join on your teammates would be great. If a vehicle has a minigun then let it be a bit more like a minigun, and not a pea shooter. Content is king though, as much as our group of people have enjoyed battlefield 2042 in the past few months (finally) the just aren't enough maps for it. If they are going to do a season pass then each season pass needs two or three new maps. And let's hope the destructible scenery is good again, 2042 fell short on that one.
Thanks for keeping us informed! I kinda of gave up on this franchise but I remain ready just in case. Your videos are straight to the point : no long intro, no sponsor, no convulated way to extend the video... We also get exactly what the title say, and your voice and diction are calming (you could be a singer !). I follow you for the next informations! Thanks
2042 started out terrible, but I can jump on that game now and it is so much fun. I believe the movement, weapons, and maps are great. The scale is unmatched and the destruction during fire fights in close quarters is insane. I play Warzone almost every day but I have never been in a gun fight that is anywhere near Battlefields. It just feels more chaotic and engaging. There are so many moments that you just go HOLY SHIT!!!! That just happened.
_Except..._ matchmaking is still ropey, hit reg is inconsistent, the recoil bug is back and aim assist with controller has problems which have never been fixed properly...
I haven't played a game in a minute. But got the bug. Downloaded 2042 back on my system. Played it the next day.. for maybe 30 minutes, and then turned it off. Haha Just wasn't fun to me. If I'm being as charitable as possible I can say 2042 isn't a bad game. It's just still a terrible BATTLEFIELD game. It's hard for me to say much positive about this game when I've played bf3 bf4 and bf1. It's such a downgrade in every way from those titles. I'm so sad my bf1 disc is fucked up and won't install. But even then, I want to play in a modern setting more often. And bf4 on console only has a few active servers. So I try to give 2042 a try. But it's just bad. Going from bf4 to 2042 is like going from a classic hip hop album to a kids bop album.
@@yootchoobe matchmaking is difficult with such a small player base, hit reg for sure could use work but I feel its like that in all games, I never heard of aim assist until call of duty so not sure on that one
They have to get this launch right. They have to make the game like BF3 or BF4 but with improved graphics, a return to levolution and even something like BF1 with Operations and story telling, even if it’s fake. One thing I loved about BF1 was the story telling between operations. They should even consider bringing back flametrooper, tank hunter kits but in a modern way. Like the tank hunter kits comes with a similar rifle as well as an explosive drone. Flametrooper can be similar but with more modern looking armor/stronger flamethrower/EMP trooper. I think that can bring back the franchise if they do it right.
Ok i think called Battlefield 5's launch flawless is quite revisionist, everyone roasted that game constantly basically until 2042 released, and only then did it start being widely acclaimed. (I know because i was really excited for it and then got turned off from getting it by all the negative press/community sentiment about it)
I think the main problem is that they seem to have forgotten the real identity of the Battlefield franchise few years ago... When they started to experiment with different "weird" ideas and new gaming "trends" that do not work so well in all of the games... That is the main reason it went downhill in my opinion... Going back to the roots, to the basics, should save the day imo. We need more conservatism that worked throughout all these previous years in gaming and elsewhere, less wokeism and testing some new stupid ideas on players... Let's Make Battlefield Great Again!!! Power to the People (Players)!!! 😎😉💪🙏
My opinion is that it doesn't matter what they claim and what is "leaked". We will find out what is going on when the game is released. That's the only time we will know for sure what the game will be like.
It would be nice if they did get back to basics. Although I enjoy many of the "specialist" traits (I feel like these could be class gadgets or traits), I do miss good teamwork. The circle of hell format seems to bring that back with the classes, it forces cooperative game play in a natural way (do you want to win? Help your squad and team) as opposed to 60 lone wolves and 4 players supporting their team.
That’s my biggest issues with 2042…. The specialists. Just a juvenile carbon copy of COD in that regard. Aside from that, I’ve been enjoying 2042 since launch. Lack of server browser is a whole other issue. But we won’t ever see it again outside of portal, I’m almost positive
They always _say_ they want player feedback. They ignored feedback in BF5 Alpha and Beta and BF2042 Alpha and Beta. The reason they ignore feedback is they have already designed the game a certain way. No way were they going to drop 128 players and the specialists (for example) in BF2042. No way were they going to revamp the crappy vehicles or the battle royale mechanics (for example) in BF5. They were way too invested in games that weren't what Battlefield franchise fans wanted. Do we believe they will really go back to what made BF3/4/1 so good just because they say they will and they are listening? BF1 is the BF and they even tried to ruin that. We had a CTE server in BF1 and they ignored bad feedback for the TTK2.0 testing and went ahead and tried to spoil BF1 with it anyway, because they wanted to test bad TTK for BF5... Have we learned EA cares little about what fans of franchises like Battlefield (and DragonAge) actually want? They are only interested in what monetary worth they can suck out of them. Don't pre-order, folks. Or at least be ready to refund quickly.
In my opinion, the should just make a game and continue long support for at least 10 years instead of dropping support and making one from scratch. 2042 might not be the best launch BF game, but it definitely got to a very enjoyable state, but it was just the lack of content that killed it
Longtime fans truly haven't had the original bettlefield experience since BF4 over 10 years ago now. Hardline, V, and 2042 have scarred it so badly, and as decent as 1 was it played like a spinoff. COD pulled it off with Modern Warfare 2019, if what even remains of DICE cannot see what they need to emulate it's over with. Stalker 2 can be developed by devs growing up with the original's glory, I hope DICE has that same new blood leading the return to 3 & 4
@@MrTD714 I saw Hardline as a side project, it could have been BF4 DLC and I felt very naive for paying the $120 premium edition as soon as it launched. It was definitely the omen of business practices to come
every email they send me asking what i liked/dislike i send a huge replie lol, but i will never saw want i saw in a beta because for me the NDA is for my life not the games life, play test is great if its been done right, last one i did was on bf1.. thx for the video like always great
I find it so funny and sad at the same time that EA and DICE (plus the rest of Battlefield franchise development teams) for a few good years now don't seem to grasp the fact or fail to accept that we the people (mostly simple people), we the players (mostly simple players), we do not need some revolution in gaming... We need simplicity, authenticity, going back to the basics that worked all along, until they were replaced by some new unfortunate "trends"... Players usually mainly want better graphics, not too much completely new and revolutionary gameplay mechanics that do not always work well... I mean, I like some new stuff, but not too much, because then it kills the oldschool true and tested core of the game of the franchise... Why is it so hard to understand for them after all these years... Hopefully this time around they do not make the same mistakes from previous launches and finally go back to the basics in good style for real and give us players something along the lines of BF:BC2/BF3/BF4 including all DLCs. These Battlefield games were the best so far in my opinion. Not only my opinion I guess... Long live (the good) Battlefield. 😎😉🙏
I feel like 2042 is more fun than BFV after all the fixes. Even with its innate flaws. The weird rebalancing in BFV and the movement in that game is strange as hell to me. 2042 aged pretty damn well.
Pre-orders are out of the question. Launch-day-only bonus items are out of the question. Game versions not giving free next-gen console upgrades without any time limitation are out of the question. Release 2 months before or after GTA6 launch is out of the question. Game without an unbelievable generational lift (GTA3->4->5) and never-before-seen quality and features is out of the question. Game without near perfect anti-cheat defense for multi-player is out of the question. Not hanging up "Remember Concord's failure? Got the studio shut down!" inspirational posters all over the dev studio offices is out of the question. There's a mountain to climb here, and we'll be judging, sitting at the top seeing them struggle to come up.
i cant wait for the CTE to return because i do not trust all these internal play tests they are doing. those are probably shills who are the play testers. the real player base needs to have access to this new battlefield game! we are the majority!
They need to drop the live service approach as its been a failure since it was implemented. They need well sorted and thought out DLC's like BF4. We had a ton of maps by comparison back then, along with weapons, in comparison to every iteration since that game. I dont see how anything they're mentioning is going to change the direction of the franchise. Oh... and STOP going back to "modern." If we're going back, the next game should be something entirely new and unseen or a revisit to something that hasnt yet been done in a long while, such as Vietnam or 2142. I'd be immediately ready to drop coin on either of those genres.
If Battlefield wants to succeed, they should mimick COD and just add a little faster pacing with smaller maps. Battlefield also has the realism advantage, which alot of COD players are currently looking for. Although COD is highly successful, many players want something better and theres currently no true options on the market.
I hope the playtesters are allowed to express criticism :) It's 2024, so I'm imagining a "safe space" for shills :D "OMG, this is great. The antenna falls down, a true Battlefield moment. Return to form!" :)
Do not pre order, what's the point since it's all digital. Pre-order was for the physical media days. I would love to see the ability to one hand grab and drag a downed teammate while one hand hip fire your primary or secondary so you can drag a player out of danger. Be cool. Maybe be able to bury yourself in the sand or dirt in some areas and the tell tell sign is just a straw sticking out. 😂
I remember when i said "with how much BF5 flopped they have to be bringing an awesome battlefield after that" and I actually enjoyed bf5. Bf2042 i played for like 2 hours when they gave the 5 hours free and i definitely wont let them burn me again. Do not pre-order any future battlefield. Pre ordering when most games are digital is for fools
Don't count on external underpaid testers who never played bf3/4 during prime. They NEED to start actual community playtest via rare invites as soon as possible in order to have a chance at implementing feedback at all. If the verdict is bad they should postpone the game for 2 years if needed and start from scratch! Last chance for the franchise
You could make the most perfect game with the best testers feedback ever and STILL get the haters, and they are contagious., So once that starts it grows and that's what all developers are always up against (the mindless, faceless people who sit and comment) - its how it is.
Well I don’t think they will mess this up too bad because this is their last chance basically. They did not care before because there was no competition before.
Given EADice's past record of _repeatedly_ messing things up over and over again I'd say there's a greater than 50% chance the next release will have _some_ issue... Never underestimate EA's ability to say all the right things while doing the opposite.
They don't know how to make a Battlefield game. Making a Battlefield where the field of battle. Nothing gets destroyed? Develope it, make it, I'm not getting it. Only way I will play it is FREE to play. They not getting one cent from me anymore. 🤗
Battlefield 3 & 4 picked up all the player base. Battlefield 5 & 1, world war vibes destroyed the damn game. So people just couldn't get on board with 2042.
Woah woah woah man, don't shit on one. That was an awesome job at WWI and I thoroughly enjoyed both single and multiplayer. Three and four were great for their modern day takes, at least we're still in the realm of realistic and not into the futuristic wall running or whatever other shooters are putting out. Five on the other hand, well, "if you don't like it don't buy it"... Yeah I'm still on about that fantasy robot woman cyclops bend from the dev. Very bad form and completely offputting.
@uss-dh7909 Yeah, I understand a couple of people liked WWl vibes. That's where the drop off started in reality. Not saying you shouldn't like it, but clearly the hype stopped after BF4
calling it "Battlefield" is the actual dumbest thing ever., also think they should go back to... I think it was 7 classes? In bf2. And also squad leader is the only person to spawn on. And slow things down. Honestly, just make bf2 again...
Even with all the hate 2042 got, for me is still a fun game to play! With all the compromises that they did for the game to be able to handle 128 players and also release on old gen platforms i'm pretty sure the next one will be epic considering they going back to 64 players and probably not releasing it for older gen! I just hope that it's gonna get the amount of content bf4 got even if that means we have to pay for it!
They’re going with a player first approach, so you’ll all be happy to know that they’ll be taking the franchise to space!! And you’ll be fighting Russian aliens! Not sure how it’ll work
I am not in the playtest so I can't tell you anything about it and even if I was in the playtest I couldn't tell you anything about it because of the NDA I had to sign.
I dont care what they say, only unscripted gameplay will prove it
Yep. Agree. 👍
Exactly!
Remember, Do Not Preorder
they untill now didnt fix issues.They cant handle them.After every Patch there are new or old errors coming back.
Applies to literally every game.
Learned my lesson after bf4, haven't pre-ordered another game since.
Been playing since BF1942 and this will be the first one I do not preorder, we'll see if they listen to the feedback
Hold the line!!
There is no way Tom Henderson has been leaking every single BF release content since BF3 and hasn't been fired or cut his connections. I would bet money that DICE is paying him to do the breadcrumbs to 'excite' the community
Tom Henderson is a known liar, he made up a lot of things 2042 should have had and created the hype train and then profited off of the disaster.
They know "leaks" creates hype.
It is called marketing 😊
We have a Sherlock here!
Of course
Hilarious that in an entertainment market full of remakes, EA refuse to remake Bad Company 2/ BF3 or BF4 with some new tech
It wouldn't be the true iteration of the game if they ever did remaster it. It would be riddled with micro transactions for stupid skins etc. We'll never see the true game again.
No remasters, no remakes. Fully new games ONLY Dice!
@@zzznardszzz4715 Nah, Remaster Bad Company 1 and 2. Not even for the multiplayer. Give us those campaigns again. I lost my xbox 360. I can't play Bad Company's campaign anymore.
Ironically, I think it's actually commendable that DICE keeps trying something new, and that's something that I wish we could be praising the larger entertainment industry on, rather than having to watch them waste years and millions on production of the same things over and over.
@@squashiejoshie200000 and put the old titles back onto the servers if they expect the new ones to be purchased.
they simply do not listen. BFV, 2042. They don't care about players, just jumping on trends or PC ideals. No one wants Firestorm. No one wants your take on other games. We want a good BF game.
I won't buy it unless the MC is a pierced, dyed-hair woman of color that puts the one in BFV's opening screen to shame. We. Want. PROGRESS.
@@joewallace9030 Methinx Joey here is just *_really_* into his grizzled, buff, 5 o'clock shadow, experienced older white guys. Can't get enough of them.
Good to see your channel isn't hacked anymore!!!
Biggest thing for me is the ability to turn crossplay off AND find populated servers. Oh, and a server browser, so when I back out of a server because of the map or mode (I like BF3 and BC2 modes the best) I'm not thrown into the exact same server instance. But I know I'm dreaming and it's because of the low player count I keep getting put into the exact same server.
You mean turn crossplay ON…it needs to be OFF by default
@@zzznardszzz4715 Thanks for fixing that for me 😆
I hate the crossplay man
I doubt they will ever bring back server browser. All companies are using some form of SBMM, or EOMM these days. Basically the software can live nerf/boost you depending on how you play. And will put you in servers based on how you’re playing. It’s not about making a better experience for you, it’s about increasing the odds of you spending money on skins, models etc. And it works very well apparently.
@@bertgummer8125 I know it's not going to happen. It's funny, in BF3/BF4 when Battlelog came out everybody hated it at first (launch a browser to find a game). But that gave us the most agency over our games and I bet we'll never see anything like it again. You could pick your game mode, map, and see the score, how many tickets left, and even who was on each team and their current k/d during the game. Now companies only add features if it makes them more money.
Limit to 64 players seems a bit disappointing to me I'd like to have the option to have larger games if they're balanced correctly. It doesn't have to be a full 128 but 64 does feel pretty small at this point.
i agree. wish they 50 v 50
MAG did seamless 256 player battles over 15 years ago on PS3…we should have a 1000 player mode by now.
@@zzznardszzz4715Hell, Planetside 2 is doing huge scale maps and player counts now and that game is OLD but still doing it right.
@@Ghostrider0067 PLANETSIDE MENTIONED WHAT IS A DEAD GAME?!?!
@@PaulCrosby-d5p PS2 is far from dead. It's 12 years old and still gets new content releases and has a far more loyal and recurring fan base than this game will ever have. They're still doing it right after all this time, else players wouldn't be remotely as dedicated as they are to it.
Doesn't matter how many studios they throw at it - that just spells too many cooks.
Also, they already did the whole influencer playtesting thing (their "gamechangers" or whatever it was they called them) for BFV, and that didn't help at all.
What they need is a _clear, unitary vision_ that they stick to _and follow through to the end._ They can't give up a year in because things aren't working out, and the first step to getting there is to _not_ listen to the vocal minority (aka influencers). A majority of their players are "casual" and that should be seen as their target demographic, and they won't reach them by pandering to "selected" players, especially youtubers and twitchers, nor will they reach them by copying what other games do. They need to realize that they are something rather unique - and that they already know it.
Imagine a battlefield game where you can't even corner or peak anymore. That's what they did to battlefield. They killed it.
Remmember when the beta was garbage and they said it was an old build?? AND PEOPLE BELIEVED IT
No preorders.
Battlefield 2042 is the reason I’ve never pre ordered any game shi traumatized me 💀👍🏾
Hoping for the best, probably the last shot the franchise has. Have been playing since 1942 on pc. Has to be a success like bf1 was.
Remember: They launched 2042 WITHOUT A SCOREBOARD. THAT"S how incompetent these devs were. It took 5 months to get that. It was a painful year and never again. The next BF has to blow me away before i even consider spending a dime on another EA game.
Haha, I forgot about that. Oof!
bro i was playing some bf3 last night and on the loading screen for Caspian Border it said "the scoreboard is always available to see during a match" i laughed so hard.
You won’t know until you buy it and try it lol
Thanks for the update CadW👍
It's a good sign when internally they want the game to succeed, but remember to NOT pre-order until at least you play the beta.
“Compared to 2042, Battlefield V’s launch was flawless.” Wow, what a statement.
Sounds good, let's hope that the play testers aren't DEI consultants or streamers outside the genre
we've all heard these buzzwords from EA and DICE since the backlash that was Battlefield 5. so essentially i'm not holding my breath
What would be cool is if they added "official" servers back to portal. Waiting forever only to be kicked out because of player thresholds not being met wastes 30min easy. If people could see the player count in advance they would join so games stayed persistent instead of join, wait, wait again, be kicked back to menu, join wait again. Beyond frustrating.
Thanks to talk about this topic. You will be my source for Battlefield 6 news.
Here's hoping it's a winner and we see it soon.
If they can't release the next BF before GT6 releases, it'll honestly be the smartest move for EA to push it to 2026.
Back to basics is good with me. A respawn system that makes it easier to join on your teammates would be great. If a vehicle has a minigun then let it be a bit more like a minigun, and not a pea shooter.
Content is king though, as much as our group of people have enjoyed battlefield 2042 in the past few months (finally) the just aren't enough maps for it.
If they are going to do a season pass then each season pass needs two or three new maps.
And let's hope the destructible scenery is good again, 2042 fell short on that one.
Thanks for keeping us informed! I kinda of gave up on this franchise but I remain ready just in case.
Your videos are straight to the point : no long intro, no sponsor, no convulated way to extend the video...
We also get exactly what the title say, and your voice and diction are calming (you could be a singer !).
I follow you for the next informations!
Thanks
2042 started out terrible, but I can jump on that game now and it is so much fun. I believe the movement, weapons, and maps are great. The scale is unmatched and the destruction during fire fights in close quarters is insane. I play Warzone almost every day but I have never been in a gun fight that is anywhere near Battlefields. It just feels more chaotic and engaging. There are so many moments that you just go HOLY SHIT!!!! That just happened.
_Except..._ matchmaking is still ropey, hit reg is inconsistent, the recoil bug is back and aim assist with controller has problems which have never been fixed properly...
I haven't played a game in a minute. But got the bug. Downloaded 2042 back on my system. Played it the next day.. for maybe 30 minutes, and then turned it off. Haha
Just wasn't fun to me.
If I'm being as charitable as possible I can say 2042 isn't a bad game. It's just still a terrible BATTLEFIELD game.
It's hard for me to say much positive about this game when I've played bf3 bf4 and bf1.
It's such a downgrade in every way from those titles.
I'm so sad my bf1 disc is fucked up and won't install.
But even then, I want to play in a modern setting more often. And bf4 on console only has a few active servers. So I try to give 2042 a try. But it's just bad.
Going from bf4 to 2042 is like going from a classic hip hop album to a kids bop album.
@@yootchoobe matchmaking is difficult with such a small player base, hit reg for sure could use work but I feel its like that in all games, I never heard of aim assist until call of duty so not sure on that one
Yes, I like hearing your news and updates. Thanks. 😁
Please Dice if you’re watching this plz keep your word plz 2042 and 5 (almost) is not traditional
They have to get this launch right. They have to make the game like BF3 or BF4 but with improved graphics, a return to levolution and even something like BF1 with Operations and story telling, even if it’s fake. One thing I loved about BF1 was the story telling between operations. They should even consider bringing back flametrooper, tank hunter kits but in a modern way. Like the tank hunter kits comes with a similar rifle as well as an explosive drone. Flametrooper can be similar but with more modern looking armor/stronger flamethrower/EMP trooper. I think that can bring back the franchise if they do it right.
Ok i think called Battlefield 5's launch flawless is quite revisionist, everyone roasted that game constantly basically until 2042 released, and only then did it start being widely acclaimed.
(I know because i was really excited for it and then got turned off from getting it by all the negative press/community sentiment about it)
I just said compared to the catastrophe that 2042 was at launch. I know BFVs launch wasn't flawless.
Been playing 2042 for 1.5 year now. S130 and still love it 😊
I think the main problem is that they seem to have forgotten the real identity of the Battlefield franchise few years ago... When they started to experiment with different "weird" ideas and new gaming "trends" that do not work so well in all of the games... That is the main reason it went downhill in my opinion... Going back to the roots, to the basics, should save the day imo. We need more conservatism that worked throughout all these previous years in gaming and elsewhere, less wokeism and testing some new stupid ideas on players... Let's Make Battlefield Great Again!!! Power to the People (Players)!!! 😎😉💪🙏
Im a sucker for pre-orders 😢.
And that's why games are half assed nowadays, they already have your money why would they bother putting in effort
My opinion is that it doesn't matter what they claim and what is "leaked". We will find out what is going on when the game is released. That's the only time we will know for sure what the game will be like.
It would be nice if they did get back to basics. Although I enjoy many of the "specialist" traits (I feel like these could be class gadgets or traits), I do miss good teamwork. The circle of hell format seems to bring that back with the classes, it forces cooperative game play in a natural way (do you want to win? Help your squad and team) as opposed to 60 lone wolves and 4 players supporting their team.
If it has specialists, I'll pass.
I think I remember them saying they won’t have specialists.
Traditional classes were already confirmed.
That’s my biggest issues with 2042…. The specialists. Just a juvenile carbon copy of COD in that regard. Aside from that, I’ve been enjoying 2042 since launch. Lack of server browser is a whole other issue. But we won’t ever see it again outside of portal, I’m almost positive
They always _say_ they want player feedback.
They ignored feedback in BF5 Alpha and Beta and BF2042 Alpha and Beta.
The reason they ignore feedback is they have already designed the game a certain way.
No way were they going to drop 128 players and the specialists (for example) in BF2042.
No way were they going to revamp the crappy vehicles or the battle royale mechanics (for example) in BF5.
They were way too invested in games that weren't what Battlefield franchise fans wanted.
Do we believe they will really go back to what made BF3/4/1 so good just because they say they will and they are listening?
BF1 is the BF and they even tried to ruin that. We had a CTE server in BF1 and they ignored bad feedback for the TTK2.0 testing and went ahead and tried to spoil BF1 with it anyway, because they wanted to test bad TTK for BF5...
Have we learned EA cares little about what fans of franchises like Battlefield (and DragonAge) actually want? They are only interested in what monetary worth they can suck out of them.
Don't pre-order, folks. Or at least be ready to refund quickly.
In my opinion, the should just make a game and continue long support for at least 10 years instead of dropping support and making one from scratch. 2042 might not be the best launch BF game, but it definitely got to a very enjoyable state, but it was just the lack of content that killed it
No one here is mentioning BF4 so I'll just say it. BF4 is the best Battlefield ever and needs to be updated, that's it!
Longtime fans truly haven't had the original bettlefield experience since BF4 over 10 years ago now. Hardline, V, and 2042 have scarred it so badly, and as decent as 1 was it played like a spinoff.
COD pulled it off with Modern Warfare 2019, if what even remains of DICE cannot see what they need to emulate it's over with.
Stalker 2 can be developed by devs growing up with the original's glory, I hope DICE has that same new blood leading the return to 3 & 4
Hardline felt mpre bf than alp the gales you mentioned it just came out at a bad bf5 is the worst bf game to date
@@MrTD714 I saw Hardline as a side project, it could have been BF4 DLC and I felt very naive for paying the $120 premium edition as soon as it launched. It was definitely the omen of business practices to come
2:30 ngl that dude was locked tf in for that shot😂
Here's hoping they fix EA AC as well so it doesn't kill Armoury Crate and prevent me from having fan control outside of BIOS.
Cadwoman what weapon are you using in the video? It looks amazing ❤
Looks like a pp 2000 not sure i bailed on 2042 it's not for me
PP2000, its BF3 vault weapon in the game
It's the DFR Strife lmg. You can use belt feed ammo or turn it into a assult rifle with the ar mags.
@@wesxme naw broski its the pp 2000 it shows on the kills
@HAIL_CAESAR_XIII I was close to the end of the video, where she changed over 😂. Didn't even notice the switch.
every email they send me asking what i liked/dislike i send a huge replie lol, but i will never saw want i saw in a beta because for me the NDA is for my life not the games life, play test is great if its been done right, last one i did was on bf1.. thx for the video like always great
I find it so funny and sad at the same time that EA and DICE (plus the rest of Battlefield franchise development teams) for a few good years now don't seem to grasp the fact or fail to accept that we the people (mostly simple people), we the players (mostly simple players), we do not need some revolution in gaming... We need simplicity, authenticity, going back to the basics that worked all along, until they were replaced by some new unfortunate "trends"... Players usually mainly want better graphics, not too much completely new and revolutionary gameplay mechanics that do not always work well... I mean, I like some new stuff, but not too much, because then it kills the oldschool true and tested core of the game of the franchise... Why is it so hard to understand for them after all these years... Hopefully this time around they do not make the same mistakes from previous launches and finally go back to the basics in good style for real and give us players something along the lines of BF:BC2/BF3/BF4 including all DLCs. These Battlefield games were the best so far in my opinion. Not only my opinion I guess... Long live (the good) Battlefield. 😎😉🙏
BF5 is still the greatest WW2 and the best played of all Battlefield series.
Good video. Hope it's all true
They said 'player first' about BF2042 too.
Can’t Wait to Pre-Order!!!!!!
It’s gonna be as good as BF4, 1 and V……🤪
I feel like 2042 is more fun than BFV after all the fixes. Even with its innate flaws. The weird rebalancing in BFV and the movement in that game is strange as hell to me. 2042 aged pretty damn well.
Sempre as mesmas informações que a EA solta sobre o próximo battlefield... TODO ANO 😂
Pre-orders are out of the question.
Launch-day-only bonus items are out of the question.
Game versions not giving free next-gen console upgrades without any time limitation are out of the question.
Release 2 months before or after GTA6 launch is out of the question.
Game without an unbelievable generational lift (GTA3->4->5) and never-before-seen quality and features is out of the question.
Game without near perfect anti-cheat defense for multi-player is out of the question.
Not hanging up "Remember Concord's failure? Got the studio shut down!" inspirational posters all over the dev studio offices is out of the question.
There's a mountain to climb here, and we'll be judging, sitting at the top seeing them struggle to come up.
i cant wait for the CTE to return because i do not trust all these internal play tests they are doing. those are probably shills who are the play testers. the real player base needs to have access to this new battlefield game! we are the majority!
They need to drop the live service approach as its been a failure since it was implemented. They need well sorted and thought out DLC's like BF4. We had a ton of maps by comparison back then, along with weapons, in comparison to every iteration since that game. I dont see how anything they're mentioning is going to change the direction of the franchise.
Oh... and STOP going back to "modern." If we're going back, the next game should be something entirely new and unseen or a revisit to something that hasnt yet been done in a long while, such as Vietnam or 2142. I'd be immediately ready to drop coin on either of those genres.
If Battlefield wants to succeed, they should mimick COD and just add a little faster pacing with smaller maps. Battlefield also has the realism advantage, which alot of COD players are currently looking for. Although COD is highly successful, many players want something better and theres currently no true options on the market.
I hope the playtesters are allowed to express criticism :) It's 2024, so I'm imagining a "safe space" for shills :D "OMG, this is great. The antenna falls down, a true Battlefield moment. Return to form!" :)
Do not pre order, what's the point since it's all digital. Pre-order was for the physical media days.
I would love to see the ability to one hand grab and drag a downed teammate while one hand hip fire your primary or secondary so you can drag a player out of danger.
Be cool.
Maybe be able to bury yourself in the sand or dirt in some areas and the tell tell sign is just a straw sticking out. 😂
Squads haven’t worked right since battlefield 3.:lests hope that works at Lanch
I remember when i said "with how much BF5 flopped they have to be bringing an awesome battlefield after that" and I actually enjoyed bf5. Bf2042 i played for like 2 hours when they gave the 5 hours free and i definitely wont let them burn me again. Do not pre-order any future battlefield. Pre ordering when most games are digital is for fools
lol, wish they would have play tested the other flop titles...
They need to go back to what battlefield 2,3 and 4 was. Actual battlefield games...
Battlefield 2 modern combat on og Xbox was the best BF ever
Don't count on external underpaid testers who never played bf3/4 during prime.
They NEED to start actual community playtest via rare invites as soon as possible in order to have a chance at implementing feedback at all.
If the verdict is bad they should postpone the game for 2 years if needed and start from scratch!
Last chance for the franchise
Lets hope they are getting feedback from actual bf player base, not warzone or fortnite.
If this play test / beta takes place 3 or 4 months before the release date then I won't take this game seriously
I believe in nothing they say. Sure enough, I'm ready to play Delta Force.
You could make the most perfect game with the best testers feedback ever and STILL get the haters, and they are contagious.,
So once that starts it grows and that's what all developers are always up against (the mindless, faceless people who sit and comment) - its how it is.
I trust Vince, not EA or DICE
Well I don’t think they will mess this up too bad because this is their last chance basically. They did not care before because there was no competition before.
Given EADice's past record of _repeatedly_ messing things up over and over again I'd say there's a greater than 50% chance the next release will have _some_ issue... Never underestimate EA's ability to say all the right things while doing the opposite.
If it's anything like 2042 I'm a no go, if it's like bad company 2 in movement sound and layout I'm game!
Dont preorder , bf is dead . Dont trust EA
I want battlefield 1 again
WAIT THIS GAMEPLAY IS NOT 6!? I THOUGHT IT WAS 6 FOR THE LONGEST TIME- 😭
PLEASE DEAR GOD BRING BACK THE DAMN SERVER BROWSER!!! PLEASE!!
Just play Squad, that game is awesome 😎
I know, I should probably give it a try some day. :D
Not on console
I still want up to 128 players
They don't know how to make a Battlefield game. Making a Battlefield where the field of battle. Nothing gets destroyed? Develope it, make it, I'm not getting it. Only way I will play it is FREE to play. They not getting one cent from me anymore. 🤗
Can we get a good campaign mode.
Dice doesn’t have a game to release next year
Not a disaster, a disgusting thing
Honestly i only want the finals level of destruction
Really? What Play Tests, what external players? Only one leaker knows about this? Who's feedback. BS alarm clanging.
I see lots of futuristic things, and will probably be disappointed as 2042 😂
If it is not BF4 with 2025 software and modern day weapons, aircraft and vehicles, the game will suck.
Battlefield 3 & 4 picked up all the player base. Battlefield 5 & 1, world war vibes destroyed the damn game. So people just couldn't get on board with 2042.
Woah woah woah man, don't shit on one. That was an awesome job at WWI and I thoroughly enjoyed both single and multiplayer. Three and four were great for their modern day takes, at least we're still in the realm of realistic and not into the futuristic wall running or whatever other shooters are putting out.
Five on the other hand, well, "if you don't like it don't buy it"... Yeah I'm still on about that fantasy robot woman cyclops bend from the dev. Very bad form and completely offputting.
@uss-dh7909 Yeah, I understand a couple of people liked WWl vibes. That's where the drop off started in reality.
Not saying you shouldn't like it, but clearly the hype stopped after BF4
calling it "Battlefield" is the actual dumbest thing ever., also think they should go back to... I think it was 7 classes? In bf2. And also squad leader is the only person to spawn on. And slow things down. Honestly, just make bf2 again...
I’m guessing Portal Mode is not going to make a return? Such a shame they self sabotage the fun of Portal, all in the name of “balance”, pffk.
Even with all the hate 2042 got, for me is still a fun game to play! With all the compromises that they did for the game to be able to handle 128 players and also release on old gen platforms i'm pretty sure the next one will be epic considering they going back to 64 players and probably not releasing it for older gen! I just hope that it's gonna get the amount of content bf4 got even if that means we have to pay for it!
if it don't have a server browser I won't be buying it , I said this at alpha feedback of 2042 they don't listen to any feedback
Grain of Salt. No pre orders
They’re going with a player first approach, so you’ll all be happy to know that they’ll be taking the franchise to space!! And you’ll be fighting Russian aliens! Not sure how it’ll work
I'm cautiously optimistic and ready to get hurt again lmao
Battlefield 5 is in my top 3
1. BF1
2. BF3
3. BF5
i don't know what they was smoking with that click bait campaign from BF2024 but they better have a actual campaign mode this game
A Stadium deja vue 😊
Then only game I play is BF4.
Just give me a working Battlefield 4.5 and I'm good.
Im enjoying the finals which apparently is made by an ex DICE dev? Dropped the ball on that guy.
Bf2042 has zero soul. If it was free to play, as it looks and feels, it would have been fine. But it was a premium price for 10 steps backward.
I am not in the playtest so I can't tell you anything about it and even if I was in the playtest I couldn't tell you anything about it because of the NDA I had to sign.
I am hopeful but skeptical. I still will not be pre-ordering it.