It’s pretty awesome indeed! Just started making an EP this week and it blows my mind how few layers you need to have a full, rich sounding track with lots of texture and movement.
I've never heard of Vecto until you mentioned it but I just looked it up and watched some of the videos. I'd say they're fundamentally different in that Vecto uses more traditional synth-style oscillators as their sound source whereas CUBE uses sampled audio which gives it more versatility. Also CUBE can load up to 8 samples (include any of your own samples) at one time since it uses a 3-dimensional vector where as Vecto only has 4. I do have an EP dropping in the next couple of days which uses only CUBE and I'll have a video up on this to give you a better idea of the sound potential of CUBE. I think the main similiarities between the two are they both utilize a vector system which you can have prerecorded paths for. Otherwise upon initial vibes, it's my opinion that Vecto has more sonic comparisons to something like Cherry Audio's Dreamsynth than CUBE in terms of the sound it produces: ruclips.net/video/rdVk1xXSdcw/видео.html
Thanks for the detailed response! I heard the Mini version is free sometimes so I'll pick that one up to try it out since the other one is helluva commitment price wise. Just trying different synthesis techniques cause I'm a big nerd like that
Would be nice if there was a "Lite" version which had the sample loader and cross fade orbits minus the samples for like $49 ...its a cool plug in but too pricey IMO to justify an effect chain consisting of volume cross fades between audio, spacial panning, arpeggiation however I definitely see the convenience ..I'd definitely snap it for like $50 for the convenience but $180 is pretty pricey , especially if you are never going to use the stock sample libraries .
That’s a great point. It’s an excellent engine even without their samples. Their sample libraries are outstanding quality but they no doubt make it more expensive up front.
Which sound pack sounds most inspiring to you? 🕺
This looks beyond awesome! I might just have to pick this up, thanks for the demonstration.
It’s pretty awesome indeed! Just started making an EP this week and it blows my mind how few layers you need to have a full, rich sounding track with lots of texture and movement.
Im looking at vector synths and this popped up. Would this be a better candidate than Rob Papen's Vecto for vector synthesis?
I've never heard of Vecto until you mentioned it but I just looked it up and watched some of the videos. I'd say they're fundamentally different in that Vecto uses more traditional synth-style oscillators as their sound source whereas CUBE uses sampled audio which gives it more versatility. Also CUBE can load up to 8 samples (include any of your own samples) at one time since it uses a 3-dimensional vector where as Vecto only has 4.
I do have an EP dropping in the next couple of days which uses only CUBE and I'll have a video up on this to give you a better idea of the sound potential of CUBE.
I think the main similiarities between the two are they both utilize a vector system which you can have prerecorded paths for. Otherwise upon initial vibes, it's my opinion that Vecto has more sonic comparisons to something like Cherry Audio's Dreamsynth than CUBE in terms of the sound it produces: ruclips.net/video/rdVk1xXSdcw/видео.html
Thanks for the detailed response! I heard the Mini version is free sometimes so I'll pick that one up to try it out since the other one is helluva commitment price wise. Just trying different synthesis techniques cause I'm a big nerd like that
Would be nice if there was a "Lite" version which had the sample loader and cross fade orbits minus the samples for like $49 ...its a cool plug in but too pricey IMO to justify an effect chain consisting of volume cross fades between audio, spacial panning, arpeggiation however I definitely see the convenience ..I'd definitely snap it for like $50 for the convenience but $180 is pretty pricey , especially if you are never going to use the stock sample libraries .
That’s a great point. It’s an excellent engine even without their samples. Their sample libraries are outstanding quality but they no doubt make it more expensive up front.
👋🏻👋🏻👋🏻
Howdy! It's been a minute! 🕺
@@GourlieRecords it has! Missed your face 😋