They FAKED a Scene! Body Language Analyst REACTS to "Harry & Meghan" on Netflix. Part 3.
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 янв 2023
- Prince Harry and Meghan Markle tell their story in the new Netflix documentary "Harry & Meghan." But what does their body language and overall behavior tell us? Are Meghan's emotions real? What does Harry REALLY Think about his family's position and how do we know that the documentary edited the Oprah interview for dramatic effect? Find out now!
Become a member of The Behavioral Arts and receive a custom badge and other perks here: ruclips.net/user/thebehavioral...
Check Out My Favorite Books on How to Read Body Language (affiliate links):
amzn.to/3TNNYdf
amzn.to/3KUJ61G
amzn.to/3cW844w
amzn.to/3Jmff3z
Find me on:
TikTok: vm.tiktok.com/9X42QX/
Instagram: / spideyhypnosis
facebook: / spideymagic
twitter: / spideyhypnosis
LINKS
The Science of Eyebrow Flashes: • Why Do We Raise Our Ey...
The Science of Shrugging: • What Can THIS Gesture ...
Check out @NateTheLawyer 's Videos about Christopher Bouzy and Twitter:
• Video
• Harry and Meghan 💥Shoc...
Newsweek article about Twitter Troll Accounts :
www.newsweek.com/meghan-markl...
Article About the Dossier Meghan Was Given to Learn About Protocol:
www.marieclaire.com/celebrity...
Creators of Eye- Accessing Cues Deny Their Reliability: nlp-now.co.uk/eyes-dont-have-...
SOURCES/RESEARCH
A Cultural Study of Open-Palm Hand Gestures and their Prosodic Correlates. Ferré, Mettouchi. 2020. hal.science/hal-03182556/docu...
The eyes don't have it: lie detection and Neuro-Linguistic Programming. Wiseman R, Watt C, ten Brinke L, Porter S, Couper SL, Rankin C. 2012 pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22808...
The Palm-Up Puzzle: Meanings and Origins of a Widespread Form in Gesture and Sign. Kensy Cooperrider 1*, Natasha Abner 2 and Susan Goldin-Meadow 1 1 Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States, 2 Department of Linguistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. 2018. www.readcube.com/articles/10....
The Semantic and Pragmatics of Everyday Gestures Müller & Posner 1998. www.kuwi.europa-uni.de/de/leh...
Forms and uses of the palm up open hand: A case of a gesture family? Muller. 2004. www.researchgate.net/publicat...
Vertical Palm Away/Oscillate : A recurrent form associated with negation in spoken and signed language. Harrison 2019. scholars.cityu.edu.hk/en/publ...
Trustworthiness of a smile as a function of changes in the eye expression
Andrés Fernández-Martín 1, Patricia Álvarez-Plaza, Laura Carqué, Manuel G Calvo. 2017.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29048...
Joe Navarro and the Tongue Jut: www.psychologytoday.com/ca/bl...
TIMESTAMPS:
01:13 Prince Harry Body Language
11:20 Why Did Meghan Markle Say That?
17:00 Is Prince Harry Lying?
24:45 Did This Expert Lie?
30:45 Meghan Markle Body Language
36:12 This Clip is FAKE!
44:40 Prince Harry Deception Indicators
#bodylanguage #psychology #meghanmarkle #princeharry #theroyalfamily #thebehavioralarts #learnbodylanguage #behavioralpsychology #liedetection #documentary 
Развлечения
"She never asked to leave". No, she just threatened you with suicide and the homicide of your child. He is so dumb.
He has no idea that she has always been the one making their decisions, that she controls him.
@@latebloomerabroad Why do I have narcissistic vibes about her?
@@Sekir80 Because she is clearly a narcissist! In many videos, you can tell that she is mad whenever anyone else is speaking and the limelight is not on her.
And you know this how? Was you there, did you hear the words out her or his mouth?
@@latoyajames134yes Harry said that in the mental health show he did with Oprah. He said she told him she wanted to harm herself but didn't because he had been through so much loss and she didn't want to add to that - she was pregnant when she told him this.
Manipulation 💯
I an an Australian and am very proud of “our” Crown Princess of Denmark, Mary. She was a commoner from Tassie who fell in love with and married the Crown Prince of Denmark. She spent two years before they got married living in a pretty ordinary apartment and being coached not only in Danish culture, Royal protocol, and history, but also had to learn a difficult foreign language. THAT is what I cal “doing everything”. I am sorry that Meghan declined the offer of a mentor and tutor. She was offered help. Meghan declined - for whatever reason. She did not have ANY intention (IMO) of adapting to and adopting the constraints of being a member of “the Firm” as she referred to the BRF.
Same in The Netherlands with (now) queen Maxima. She went through a years long programme of 'integration' to get to know the royal family, the country, the language and its people. They even went on a tour to 'get to know' all corners of the country, but it was mostly for her to practice her behaviour on visits like that, which is quite essential for a future queen. It was like a school specifically set up for her. And it was not like she was a nobody to begin with, just like the Danish Crown Princess. They both had good careers going on and knew the ways of the world. And still they needed help to grow into the role of a Royal. I think nobody can do without.
As a fellow Aussie, I wholeheartedly agree!!
Princess Sofia of Sweden has a similar background to Meghan. Sofia integrated into her new role as Princess just beautifully. She could have been a perfect rolemodel for Meghan.
Absolutely agree. As far as I can see she did very little
As a Tasmanian- we love our Mary
When I watched the Oprah interview it came across to me as well rehearsed and I was particularly suspicious of some legal advice having been taken over the wording of the way racism was claimed, so as to avoid a defamation suit by the RF or an individual member.
What has been most shocking however is that Harry allowed his grandmother to go to her death with the stench of racism hanging over her family…..cold cold heart Harry! only to retract it after she had died.
And shame on the two black women, Oprah and Meghan for undermining all of the genuine racism issues suffered by women of colour.
Heartless Harry
Thank you!🎯
Before the camera stop rolling, st the end, the three of them burst out laughing. Did anyone else catch that?
Unfortunately some of us non white ( I am Asian woman) are Interpretating innocent remarks as a racism by doing so we are doing disservice to the real problem of RACISM!!! Just like the boy who calls “ the wolf is coming “.
Meghan is not black .
Really enjoyed this broadcast, very even- handed approach. As a British subject, I want to say that I’m not sure what percentage of the population of this country actually thinks of Meghan’s ethnicity. It is her behaviour towards the RF which was offensive nothing to do with race or colour, her lack of commitment and demanding ways were what alienated her from the people.
I can’t believe how she went over there and showed her butt. SO embarrassing 😖
Im
I’m also a British subject and I completely agree. Your comments are spot on.
Absolutely.
And her behaviour to our country and it's hard working people who were paying for these abominations!
For a long time, I gave Harry and Meghan the benefit of the doubt and couldn't understand why people were so turned off by Meghan. However, when I forced myself through the painful Netflix "documentaries", I absolutely saw what everybody has been talking about. Then when Harry released his largely fictional memoir trashing his family, I saw who he really is and it is not pleasant. They have shown their true colours and it's pretty horrifying!
Similar to you, I was on their side and was waiting on the docuseries to see how I would feel. Although I did became skeptical of her with the Oprah interview. But I feel the docuseries, interviews and book just confirms what the press says. And out of their own mouth!!! Almost as if the producers were working against them, but then again they were producers plus it came from their mouth!! They became a complete turn off for me, and I actually became mad because I defended them for a while. He is weak and was without a purpose and plan. Instead of searching himself, he allowed someone else become his purpose. And she is a narcissist of the worst kind.
I used to like them both a lot. Now I find them so disrespectful and I’m so disappointed in them.
Me too i was a very big fan but after that circus oprah interview when they know prince philip was dying they lost me
I'm glad folks are finally opening their eyes to these two's sham. Bear in mind they themselves may believe their own sham. Nevertheless what is suspicious to me on a few levels is the duo share the same exact mannerisms as if he has a massive transference or like they went to the same hand-gesture coach. They both do the thing where they "search" the air and floor for the "right" word or memory WHICH HAS BEEN PRE-REHEARSED lol!
I really wouldn't call his memoir trashing anybody. He BARELY said a thing about them. It was more of a love letter to his mother than anything. He said nothing bad about Her Majesty, he said his brother pushed him, and his dad was more or less withdrawn and lacking the love and comfort he wished he'd have shown him. The person he was most critical of was Camilla but no one cares about her anyway. He basically said Kate was being a diva about flower girl dress and an Easter gift and she probably. She probably is a bitch in real life. Just because she's shiny and polished doesn't mean she's not a bitch. She looks like she would be. That said, so does Megan. I don't buy her BS either. Harry didn't say anything bad in his book though. I listened to him read the whole thing
This may already have been commented on or noticed but during her 'death threats' scene I was more interested in Harry and how he started to cover his mouth and rub his lips when she was speaking and not once did he touch her to offer comfort when she started getting emotional and teary eyed. This really made me feel as if he knew she wasn't being honest or authentic.
He thought that she was truthful when in England but by the time they did Oprah , he knew that it was a lie .
From memory, when she started talking about that subject, his elbow was resting on the back of the sofa, and as she got more emotional, that arm straightened out so that his hand was behind her. He didn't touch her, but it seemed to me like a subtle comforting movement. I maybe be wrong. Don't make me watch it again. Edit: Someone has made me watch it again by saying that his arm never moves. The move happens at 31.11
It is possible that Harry realizes her claims make it appear that he is a "failure" at protecting her... once again, bringing up memories of his mother's death.
This could be emotionally paralyzing.
I'm sure it was shocking and hurtful - and, everyone at her public status gets death threats. it's sick, but true. Her security team would have educated her about that.
I noticed that too. His hand is behind her, but never touching her. The face touching... I think it's more like a soothing thing, he feels uncomfortable watching M cry. Maybe he thinks that crying in public is something you're not supposed to do.
A subtle, but important, thing you didn't pick up on in this video, is that in the Oprah interview Harry said that this alleged conversation about skin colour came up only when they were dating, way before any wedding even took place. It was alleged speculation as to how their POTENTIAL future kids might look. So it was NOT about Archie. Archie didn't exist in any way, shape or form at this point. He wasn't even a fetus. YET, the world's media kept misreporting that it was a conversation about 'Archie's skin colour', simply because Meghan had wrongly claimed that earlier in the Oprah interview. After the Oprah interview the couple never corrected the media mistake, they let it lie, AND in the Bradby interview Harry repeats the misconception that it was about Archie, when Harry says 'there was concern about his skin colour'. No, Harry, it was about potential future kids in the early days of your dating. He's pathetic. They both are.
It is shocking how the media allowed this fact to pass without comment !
She was prego before the wedding, it's how she got him
@@marycarver1542it's shocking how everyone wants to blame the news when the 2 knew better. That's why it's best not to say anything about anything the Queen was so very smart and wise. They knew what the media did they should have corrected it. Instead of letting his grandparents live with that on their death beds. That is cruel and unusual behavior. That was his beloved grandparents who had always been there for him.
In the Oprah interview it was implied that the Royal family was Racist but Harry backtracked 2 yrs later! in the Bradbury interview that wasn't said but that they said the RF had Unconscious Bias. Unfortunately not good from truth telling point of view.
@@helenalalonde6415not unless she was more than 12 months pregnant she wasn't
Most of us remember well seeing the interview from before she met Harry where she bragged about having the ability to cry on demand and be able to produce a tear out of her left eye. She actually said " left eye one tear...go". Which is exactly what she does in this when she pretends to be afraid and says she's a mother. This is the girl that calls the paparazzi. She was as safe as could be inside the royal family. She certainly never looked afraid doing her walk abouts and going up to get flowers. She encouraged Harry to be afraid.
It was said at the time of Her Majestys funeral, and the video supported it with photos, that her trick was
an old actors one of hiding a stick of ammonia or something similar inside her glove, and s urreptitiously, so
she thought of touching it to her eye to produce tears. Hence, the one eyed tear !
I put nothing , absolutely nothing, past this vipers ability to lie !
@@marycarver1542no nh
@@marycarver1542l0
Girl??? she is a middle-aged woman!
I sense a LOT of hatred from viewers on your channel. They make unsubstantiated claims that she's manipulating Harry.
Great analysis of the Oprah editing magic. Don't forget - they actually accepted an award from the Robert Kennedy Foundation for, according to interviews with Kerry Kennedy, "standing up to 'structural racism' within the Royal Family" [which even though he accepted the award, he now says he never accused them of racism.] THIS is why people have had enough of these two.... the constant lies, the drama, the inferences, the insanity of it all.
Exactly! How can they accept an award for standing up to racism in the royal family if they are now saying there is no racism??!!! This couple is just dirt.
That’s one great example- there are others, but that one is so apparent!
and sadly, this discredited the Kennedy award.
@@maryk3458 not sadly-----it CORRECTLY discredited the completely undeserved award.
That Kerry Kennedy has egg on her face. Kerry Kennedy needs to apologize to the public for giving that award to the phony Harry and Meghan.
🙄🙄The thing that gets me is Methane has a lot of nerve playing the "race" card while during her entire life she has "identified as "Caucasian"; even on her drivers license! 🙄🙄🙄 NOW, suddenly she is Black? Noooo, girl thats not how it works. She's playing this now because she thinks it serves her! 😤
That's because narcissists never do anything honestly. They are opportunists at their very core. Whatever serves their own agenda and purposes best is who they become.
We in the Commonwealth knew she was just mixed race woman n never Caucasian.
She actually put Caucasian on her driver's license? How would anybody know that? I mean I realize she is constantly trying to "erase" her Black hair by straightening it. The then Prince Charles said that he didn't even realize that she was half black when he first met her at all. But unless SHE said something about identifying as Caucasian on her license or somebody who knew her VERY well indeed said it....
In Suit I thought she is mix with Spanish never in my mind to think that she is mix with black🤦♀️
They picked up an award for exposing racism in the family ! Such hypocrisy
So why doesn’t Harry and Meghan returned the award that they accepted from Ms Kennedy for calling out racism in the Royal Family.
Meg teaches us about the Narcissist at work.
Harry needed a Therapist not a publisher I can’t believe they didn’t get proper advice on risk assessment for this book before it came out.
They'll take every opportunity to make money to maintain the life they are used to.
A physiatrist not therapist. He has been seeing* a therapist an$ it hasn’t helped. The things he wrote about , should have only been told to a physiatrist . It’s sad; he used to be so cute
I don’t think their staff care about them and the publishers also don’t care for them … just the money
@@maryhudgins9133 and will you believe, he’s doing summits for Better Up (their MENTAL HEALTH charity) costing $995.00 per person 🙀. How on earth can he be qualified to be a mental health coach?????? I think someone needs to step in and stop him!!! He’s doing HARM to people with mental health problems.
He recommended illegal drugs for mental health issues !
As someone who was bullied through my entire childhood and absolutely will call out bullying whenever I see it, I don’t believe that what is happening to H&M is “bullying.” To me, bullying is attacking someone unprovoked usually for petty reasons, for the purpose of asserting dominance. The harsh treatment H&M are receiving is a direct result of their own actions and behavior.
How awful being bullied during your young tender years. I was one that always stuck up for the underdog as it was so distressing thinking about how they must be feeling.
H and M did nothing to merit such hate. It began from the engagement video and continued on way before any interview. It's horrible that you condone bullying and try to redefine what it is. Andrews deserves all of this level of hate and then some. But it's far easier to be that horrible to a woman and one of African descent at that. I know that Brits suffer with accepting immigration. There is a lot of xenophobic sentiment and racial prejudice among the older population.
Lol wut
@@VictoriousSagenobody gives a toss that she’s a bi racial American. We have a toss that she lied time and time again and bullied our elders with threats. Well Scobie has outed what she held over their heads and we see through it.
Well then you should be angry at the people who bully Meghan everyday for 5 years.
There's not a single paparazzi on Vancouver Island.....so that's why we left. 😅😅😅
Exactly… maggot was bored without the paps taking her pictures. They also left because the Canadian government told them that they were going to stop paying for their security after 6 weeks, as they were no longer considered visiting dignitaries. Proving once again, they’re just a couple of grifters.
I like your observations and your analysis on Meghan and Harry. I am not a fan of Meghan and never have been, but I want to add a personal story about the Oprah interview. My dad is white and my mom is Hispanic (fairly dark brown skin) when my mom and I watched the interview together she said that when she was pregnant with me people also commented and asked her how dark or how white I'd turn out but she never thought it was being asked in a rude way or to be mean. She compared it to all parents wondering which parent the baby would look like more, so I feel like this conversation in the Oprah interview is extremely exaggerated and it seems like it was said to create drama.
The reason why is because people of color (from the States) always will play the racist card.
Drama QUEEN ! certainly not QUEEN OF HEARTS as she has tried to portray herself as a woman who was treated badly by the Monarchy . Diana was treated badly by the Institution & what they wanted for the future of the Monarchy & Charles was to be future KING ! This prim madonna thought she was a QUEEN without a title !!
I agree it was a an innocent remark made to H which has been taken out of context deliberately to create trouble .
I agree with you, IMO, it was a set up to trap the British Press as H knew by the way they chose to phrase the reference, that it would be interpreted as racism rather than a normal querying, as you say, who will the baby look like, what colour hair, eyes etc, will they have Uncle Bert's big nose (sorry Uncle Bert) or Aunt Sandy's short toes(sorry Sandy), these are natural enquiries. The fact that they waited 2 years, until after Prince Philips and QEII both past to then be saying they never ment racism, but meant unconcious bias. IMO that is just mean and very cruel.
Funny you say that.
Just yesterday my girlfriend showed me pics of her new daughter-in-law.
Her son is Swedish, very blonde and blue eyed. Karla is Spanish and dark-skinned.
I was excited for my girlfriend because her kids are having kids now and she's a grandmother.
I mentioned how beautiful their children will be.
Olive skin etc.
I never even closely meant it in a racist way.
I meant it as a compliment.
Everything MM does comes off as contrived. Like she practiced it in a mirror or in her mind many times. So nothing feels spontaneous or genuine, like it does when most people talk. Everyone picks up on it. She just makes you feel uncomfortable and deceived.
Also - the eluding to racism, but not saying the word "racist", yet accepting an award for calling out racism in the Royal family, then saying it was actually the media that spun it to say they called the Royal family, then editing the documentary to make it seem that Royals are racist .... Ahhh, right?! This the the nightmare hellishness of life with a narcissist. The gaslighting, crazy-making, toxicity - it drives you literally crazy. Harry looks like he's regurgitating Meghan's words, and he can't pull it off. And now we're all seeing the insanity in how they operate.
Yes, insanity indeed.
Have you ever seen any royal figure come off as genuine or spontaneous over the age of 10? These people are trained since childhood to think about their words and actions before they do them. It honestly sounds like a miserable existence. Looks to me like Harry picked the first woman who looked like she'd give him a quick exit. Now he's got regrets
My issue with Harry and Meghan is that they had been caught with so many lies that I don’t believe in anything they say anymore . And also , they make money on airing their families’ dirty laundry. Things that should have been private and only for family consumption. That is why I identify with those who do not like and believe in anything they say or do.
But thank you for your channel. I always like to watch it because I learn a lot from watching it. Thank you.
A lot of things go on within families that should not remain private.
I refuse to watch this documentary and offer these two any support! Thank you for covering it!
It’s crazy how people think an attack is coordinated, but can’t fathom that maybe 55 people just don’t like or trust Meghan ? One of these possibilities is much more likely….
Omg what are you trying to say lol
No we're all witnessing a person who turned the royal family upside down. They could have left and just😅lived their lives, but instead they yeah everyone. I would never do that to my family. And I have narcissist family members. And ex husband
You commented. Do you know how algorithms work?
@@jolenejones6243 pretty sure they will not see profits from this video
@@rosehamilton7610 I’m saying Meagan and harry are cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs 😝
What I will never understand is how people can cry without their eyes turning red or their faces getting all swollen up. When I cry, I do not look as flawless as the actress does while tears run down her eyes.
Greetings from germany
Exactly. My eyelids immediately start to squint and swell a bit when tears start coming. I can't just wipe my tears & look fabulous.
well, ages agoo she boosted about how she can cry on demand 🤷🏻♀️😉
Yip...one tear left eye....also greetings from Germany
I cry without getting all swollen up. I just become very dehydrated though and also I'm more or less allergic to my own tear. I will get a burning rash where my tear streaks are on my cheeks so I just avoid it altogether. Yet I still cry with big watery eyes from time to time, but I keep it from dropping on myface, because that just hurts me.
Tears just fall for me, the end of my nose sometimes can get red
My good sir! On that Netflix show of theirs, They edited the Queen's 21st birthday speech ; changing the meaning of the speech completely!! It's not hate or racism what we're expressing against them, it's legit disapproval and thorough examination of what _THEY_ are doing and saying, their constant insult to our intelligence is what causing most of us to react negatively towards them.
💯
Agree!
💯
Exactly
Agree!
I don’t believe a word they say. I don’t need a body language expert to tell me they’re lying. With that being said, your content is truly fascinating and I enjoy it a lot.
I'm a white senior in USA. I'm glad that this host explicitly condemns racism and bullying and says that the presence of open racists is unfortunately a fact of life today and not an indication that all of us who are critical of the Harkles are part of an organized racist campaign. However, I disagree with his saying that some of the examples of racism he dismisses are not in fact racist. He seems not to realize that criticism can racist if it is based on common racist stereotypes even if it says nothing explicitly racist. I'm no fan of the Harkles, much of whose behavior I find hypocritical, cruel, and narcissistic, but I believe that many of the commenters almost seem to froth at the mouth as they pile on to describe her with no evidence as a sexually depraved, promiscuous, yacht girl or as a poor actress. (She had stable relationships with a happy husband for 9 years, married for 7, and with the chef for 2 years; besides becoming a millionaire for serving 7 seasons, 5 before being linked with Harry, on globally distributed drama series "Suits," and she STARRED in not one, but two, feature-length films produced by the prestigious, squeaky-clean family TV Hallmark Channel. Such criticisms of her, including the grotesque and vile depictions of her giving BJs to Harry that Lady C performs regularly on her channel, are clearly based on centuries- old racist stereotypes of Black women as loose, lascivious, lazy, and incompetent. The same commenters very often confer near sainthood on MM's opportunistic, treacherous, lying sister Samantha, who began attacking her from the first moment of public knowledge of MM's relationship with Harry and who set the father up with paparazzi before the wedding, an action attributed to MM, despite the Harkles having requested from the outset tgat famiky members bot communicate with the press (see the channel The Vintage Reader on Samantha's book for a critique). I think also that many discriminated-against people who face potential stereotyping, including women of all ethnicities and faiths, tend unconsciously to exaggerate their statements by exaggerated speech patterns and emotional gestures because they feel a need to compensatefor tge feeling that they are not going to be taken seriously. Lastly, there is somewhere online a clip if MM leaving an event just before or after her wedding where she looks genuinely terrified upon looking up and seeing a really huge group of photographers arrayed in tiers on risers looming over her. It is true that all women in the BRF have taken unfair, malicious hits fron the media, but MM, half of whose family shared stories with her of merciless white mobs harming or killing community members historically in the US, did have special reason to feel alarm if even a smallish minority of the press and public despised her....
Lol 😂 same
His content only clarifies to me how my instincts/impressions are usually correct.
That's how I feel. It's interesting how see how they systematically analyze what our gut already knows.
Me too...if either of them speak...its a lie or so exaggerated it's embarrassingly bad.
That " What you got !" from Harry was so cringe ! 😂 He sounded as inane as his wife.🤣
Are we going to talk about the fact that Spidey has watched the Oprah interview enough times to immediately know which answer goes with which question. And then watched it one more time to confirm? 😂 😂 my love for this channel just multiplied
😥😥😥😂😂
Things Spidey did to provide educational videos for us. 🤣 Thanks a bunch, Spidey.
@@TheBehavioralArts WE APPRECIATE and LOVE YOU, SPIDEY! ❤❤❤❤❤❤
His spidey sense was tingling 🤣
There's also the part where Oprah asked : “who's having that conversation.... With you”
Meghan smiles and nods.
Oprah then says : what?
Shocking editing skills. And we now know no conversation , or, as Meghan put it "several conversationS" ever took place, and according to Tom Bradby's interview Harry tells us it was the British media who said that, obviously 🙄
I am sure, as a married woman of many years, that he is 75% certain that he made the decision to leave. I am also certain that when he said it she was relieved that he'd finally got the hints. In a relationship most of the decisions are made by the woman who makes sure the man thinks he did it. I'm also certain he picked a woman who would help him leave because that's what he subconsciously wanted.
Yes👏🏼👏🏼
Exactly! She made the decision and made him think it was his idea! It happens all the time!
A ticking time bomb
Shh...don't tell the men what we do....lol
If he truly wanted to leave, he could have just left. He could have left at any time, even before Markel came on the scene. Why would he suggest this half in half out nonsense. He knew his father would one day in the near future be the King. Yeh, her dramas, lies and manipulations probably made him feel that it was all his decision to "protect" his family. Protect from What? some unkind words? some people don't like her? This is a middle-aged, twice married woman, not an innocent teenager. Good grief. She was creating a lot of problems in the Royal Family, more of the truth will out itself eventually.
Vancouver Island is huge, contains several towns and cities. He is making it sound like it was their private island. The population on the island is over 864,000 people.
That is exactly right. I’d just add that his own country is also an island. 😄
Oprah surely must get an Oscar for her acting!!
Meeting her in-laws in ripped jeans and no shoes is not being ill prepared, it's ostentatiously offensive, it was saying: Look I am casual, natural, not stuck up like you people. Not exactly what I would call " doing everything I could to make them proud"
It's almost like Harry wanted her to fail. He could easily have told her what the dress code was.
@@charisma-hornum-fries
Just like turning up for their first official outing of their relationship, Meghan wore the ripped jeans.
She understands the power of clothes, the messages they convey through working with the wardrobe department of TV sets.
She knew ripped jeans is sticking up two fingers to authority.
@@charisma-hornum-fries we also don't know if he did and she choose to ignore what he said b e cause she was going to do what she wanted not was expected of her...kind of to make her mark
@@charisma-hornum-fries I think he tried when she was turning around to chat to him on the balcony once and a lip reader said he told her to face forward, not sure if the anthem was being played or not. But after her face looked thunderous I think she thought "NO" from then on she dominated him
That is displaying a total lack of respect to her new family. I'll bet that billionaire Gordon Getty hasn't seen Megs in ripped jeans and bare feet being au natural!
I can tell you why I personally question comments by Meagan. Her telling people that they were married before the wedding by the archbishop who then gave an interview saying was such was not true. To be less than truthful about something so simple as your wedding makes it difficult to trust anything else said. Sadly this is not the only example of her doing such which is why when she speaks I have a lot of doubts about anything she saying.
Avevano fatto le prove in giardino. Chissà cosa ha capito, Lei❗
@@raffaellabertoni8507 aveva quasi 40 anni e non era la prima volta che si sposava. Nemmeno la prima fede, ne avea gia cambiate due o tre per gli uomini della sua vita di feminist, empowered woman 🙄
Harry also stated in his book, that when the Queen mother died a servant had phoned to give him the details, while he was in school, that’s a downright lie, it was Easter holidays, and he was skiing on holiday with his father and brother, they were all interviewed 2 days before she died while he was skiing. So all lies. The trouble telling lies, for most people they can get away with it, but with Harry his every move has been recorded in history.
Your comment is so refreshing to read. I'm sure you realise that a marriage in the UK can not take place unless the venue has a license, which the "Backyard" of Nottingham Cottage does not have. Furthermore, two independent witnesses need to be present, AND the Archbishop of Canterbury would be breaking the law if he remarried the couple 3 days later!
H&M tell completely different stories about how they met, and how Harry proposed.
Again, why would you lie about such things? Did they consider the original stories were not glamorous enough?
If you tell so many lies, about irrelevant things, then how many important things are you also lying about?
So many people have come forward to contradict things they've said.
This includes Harry's flight instructor in Afghanistan, who said his descriptions of his training, and the stories he performed were all complete fabrications. They did not happen how Harry has described, nor could they ever have happened that way, because their strict rules they have to follow.
We could all list dozens of untruths in the interviews, and in his book - but they just don't care.
They obviously have zero regard for the truth, whilst they keep protesting this is 'their truth'.
It's Gaslighting, and Bamboozling - two tools constantly used by narcissistic people, to confuse and mislead others. Which means they can get away with telling malicious lies about others, in order to inflict much pain and suffering.
The more they speak, the more people spot the lies, the more jealous and vindictive they appear, and the less they are liked.
No wonder they've plummeted in the approval ratings.
I cannot think of a couple, in the public eye, who have ever been so dishonest, nasty, and malicious as these two.
Yet they seem totally blind to the fact that most of the public see right through them. 🥴
Harry why an apology, you threw them under the bus and backed up and drove them over again. Shame on you....
She actually annoyed me when she went on about people threatening her life . This is what her "fans" have done to her sister to the point where she's had to move . This is also what her fans threatened to do to the Queen (before she passed away) as well as the Princess of Wales and her children and they've posted it online.
So over the Christmas my mom was watching another God awful Prince meets American quirk girl and brings her home and wants to marry her movie. In all these movies the American girl comes in to buck tradition and question everything and brings a down to earthiness that the stuck up royals can't understand and in the end she changes everyone and the kingdom and I was like omg 😳 this has to be what Megan thought it was going to be like. Then I see that clip from Princess Diaries in the docuseries and I rolled my eyes. She has a degree in International Relations and she acted like a doe eyed innocent who felt thrown to the wolves. She would have been briefed and taught protocol. I don't buy any of it and I used to be a supporter.
One could 'possibly' buy her story that she didn't know anything about royals IF she was young - say Diana young - in her very early 20s and IF she didn't possess a degree in international relations - and IF she hadn't been to England several times for extended stays and spent time stalking outside Kensington Palace.
💯💕
I strongly disagree. She went into the Royal Family planning on leaving and taking the title and the prince but most importantly the money and fame. Why would she have started the diary's, the videos, etc. She even kept her clothes in storage in Canada and only got everything from it when she went back. They even admitted, at one point, that they planned to leave. She preplanned the Oprah interview at her wedding reception knowing she couldn't do it while in the RF. She intentionally broke protocol rules to create problems with the press reporting on her. She had a royal etiquette couch telling her what she was supposed to do but chose to openly defy the rules knowing the media would comment on it. She knew Diana's story inside and out to the point of recreating Diana photos to appeal to Harry as well as Diana's favorite perfume on their first date. She got the attempted suicide while pregnant right out of Diana's book, knowing Harry would want to save her because he couldn't save his mother. She invited A list Hollywood to her wedding so she could finally break in to that crowd preparing for her return. She never wanted to serve the people, she wants to be served and to make money while doing it. She was upset she wasn't getting paid for walk abouts?!? She never wanted to shake up the monarchy and add to it because she would've been a supportive role instead of being the center of attention.
Wait. She has q degree in International Relations but she didn't know who Harry was? Um. Ok.
@@barbarat5729 exactly! She even wrote in her blog about Catherine and Williams wedding, read every Diana book published and admitted in the Netflix series that they met via Instagram where she reviewed his posts. And had the audacity to claim not knowing anything about him.
what a character she is, from all accounts her father dedicated his life to her and did everything he could so that she could have a happy, normal childhood. She pays him back by saying that she and Harry want to create that for their children because it was denied to her. Pictures from her youth show her as being well dressed, and out with other girls her age, she pretty much looks like she had it all. She got a very good formal education because she was very bright and did well in school, then when she graduated she managed to land a successful part in a tv series, then she married into the British Royal Family. If anything she has lived a life most of us dream about.
You just said it all.
She even attended college, which, of course, daddy paid for.
I watched those videos and I was left speechless. The Dad loved her so much and took her to the best schools. She is a liar and fake. She wants Harry to feel sorry for her. But I believe you get what you sew. Her children will do the same to her
She uses people until she no longer needs them and then attached herself to someone else. She is as cold as a stone..no feelings for anyone but herself. My heart breaks for her Dad. Guess the only reason Mom is around is to watch the pretend children .
That's what happens when u don't give consequences and u give ur kid entitlement..I feel bad for her family..this woman is awful
Truly enjoy your content. I started watching during the Heard/Depp trial and loved your fantastic interpretations. The editing of the video has me FLOORED. It amazes me they allowed that deception to air when people can LITERALLY PULL THE OPRAH INTERVIEW (like you did) to verify it. It just makes their case so much worse. What has bothered me about them is their inauthenticity and something I couldn't place exactly... I am really glad you helped spell this out by outlining things they do that unconsciously bother a lot of people. Before you dissected the "race tweets", I paused the video and read them and immediately thought exactly what you later said - some of these aren't even racist. It's sloppy, to say the least, for a documentary that is certainly going to be dissected to present "facts" that do not hold up to even the lightest scrutiny. With these two, their desperation to force a narrative and the "like me! love me!" doesn't sit well with many people. It comes off as forced and very fake. People vote based on their gut, and people like or do not like people for reasons they can't exactly say - and I think you really help us understand why by explaining the subtleties in their nonverbal communication. I noticed another thing that MM regularly does that I feel must bother a lot of people - she tends to feign humility, while bragging. In your last video, she went on about being surprised by all the fans along the roads when she was getting married. Or "how funny" it was to be married in a castle. I feel like, to most people, the entitlement and elitism is very obvious. She tries to humble it by making a joke or feigning shock, but I don't think it works. I feel like the public has a good instinct to when they're being fooled vs. when they're being shown somebody with true humility and kindness. It is why they loved Diana. With MM, I can't help but get the same feeling I did watching Amber Heard... like somebody is trying to pull the wool over my eyes, but unsuccessfully. Truth, realness, and honesty go so much further than manipulation.
Agreed. If she had said, regarding the crowds and castle for the wedding, "surreal" instead of "funny", she would have been considered less offensive and snobbish elitist
Vancouver Is land at the beginning of January, surely if he had been in the sea he would have come out blue and freezing cold, but refreshed!!!
All she had to do was Channel her mother “emotions” To push a fake death threat (where is it?). She knowingly threatened Harry with a fake suicide (she purposefully did everything against tradition from day 1 with the royal family, she had no problem enticing antagonism) desire which she concentrated and blamed on the royal family. He was too emotional to be rational and comfort her. Pregnant women have extremely high hormone levels. But she is okay with pushing another human (harry) to the brink of hysteria. Shame on her. I believe that she used her skills as an actress to channel an emotion she practiced as a mother. She is basically deceptive.
This is the danger with them, when people talk about them being dangerous. The whole thing with them ‘insinuating’ racism and then Harry now saying they never said that and blaming it on the British press. That is dangerous! They created a ton of drama and anger and hurt, for so many people on an international level. Very dangerous what they’re doing, and I hope people see through them now. Well done for this wonderful man for pointing out so many troubling things with these people. Scary stuff.
Narcissists love to throw a spanner in the works and watch the fallout. That's entertainment to them. They don't care if it's true or false.
They sit back, looking calm and in control while most people are running around, looking crazy, trying to get to the bottom of it... and just as the people are working it out, they'll throw in another spanner.
BMW. The BBC (British media) published their cover with a picture of Harry with a gun to his head and his face covered in blood. The headline said “RACE TRAITOR”. So, yes, Harry can legitimately say that the British press ignited the racism agenda. The palace said nothing. Personally, I think they said nothing to take the heat off of Andrew. They sacrificed Harry and Meghan to protect the Queens second son.
@@susanmetz9892 He was talking about the Oprah interview. Watch the Tom Bradby interview. He says Meghan never said the word racism in regards to Archie’s skin color. That’s what I’m referring to. That was in 2021 and everyone was in an uproar over their claims. That is dangerous. You don’t make those insinuations and then say ‘oh no, we never said that, the whole thing is the fault of the British press for picking up on it.’ Please. It was clear what they were trying to do. And it worked. I’m not saying the British press has never done anything wrong, but this whole racism thing they created is on them. If it wasn’t a problem, why tell the story about the Archie’s skin color conversation? Oh I know, drama and money.
@@Dkb522 That's the thing that's very troubling, is because now, it's proven that M and H made it up, and Oprah manipulated the entire thing to make it APPEAR to be the entirely "racist royal family". She's got a big part in this, and that's NOT okay at all. Many of us have been questioning WHERE all this "racist" stuff came from, (even earlier than this) when it wasnt this way before. Many people have highly suspected that there has been a "generated racism", that "appears" to be real, when the media has been setting much of it up. And now it shows that they DID, and THEN SCREAM "racist America, and racist royal family, and racist white people" at the SAME time, while they're manipulating things to make everything APPEAR this way. That's a reprehensible thing to DO.
It's a shame; the UK has a lot less racism than USA, generally speaking.
But there is a problem in pockets of course. And with Farage still being a politician and other similar folks - there's a minority who think like that.
However, their marriage should and could have really proved so many idiots wrong and showed that they're a strong couple, regardless of their race, and they could've just been an amazing power couple, in the royal family. They could have brought some new traditions into it, while also continuing with existing traditions, to show a togetherness and an element of give and take and both sides learning and growing.
It's a shame, it truly is. I think a lot of people who dislike them ,do not dislike them for their race. More so for all the lies and such they've told. But this gives those awful racists an excuse to be vile. (Not that any excuse or justification makes any of it okay)
Prince Harry appears to me to have unresolved anger. He has not developed a mature adult view of his mother who had similar grievances as Harry has. I think she was so damaged emotionally and it bled through to him. He has never resolved the abandonment. So sad.
It is sad, but worse than that, it's scary to think how angry he could get with Meghan if he ever thought she behaved contrary to how his Mum would behave in his distorted, saintly view of her. I don't how how any person could live up to those ideals.
The look on Tom Bradbury's face was priceless 🤣😄
Tom Bradbury is too much like Harry for my taste. Disingenuous. He reminds me of Martin Bashir. My opinion only.
The lip lick thing got my attention. My first husband had this creepy lip lick; not from stress...the kind you see in movies with the bad guys. So when you said it's being deceptive or getting away with something...makes me wonder what creepy dialogue runs through his head. I was just a young girl teen bride at the time, and once I figured things out, I got out...but that lip lick continued with each creepy thing he would do...
It could also mean it makes him nervous bc she's really putting herself out there and talking about something very personal. Him being royalty he's not extremely comfortable with that. Big surprise.
I'm so happy for you. That is escaping, no the story they are trying to sell.
I feel like Megyn went into this with an attitude to conquer. Instead of joining the family. Getting to know them. Getting them to trust her and truly wanting to be a part of the family. It takes time.
I think MM has alot of hang ups, there's a name for her condition apart from 🐮 that a professional psychiatrist would know,all l see is someone who wants to destroy the RF,sad to think that Harry was manipulated to think she's like his mother. To think a future King walked her down the aisle,as she wore a beautiful tiara,and she was plotting all the time at how she would make her millions.
Megyn?
Yes!
Yes
It's Meghan. Megyn is a TV host. Just a clarification.
I found the part where meghan said she tried so hard to make them 'proud of her' very very odd. It's so childish and vain. Why would they be 'proud' of a grown adult woman for behaving in a way that anyone would be expected to behave? Of course you should want a pleasant relationship with your in-laws.
This is hands down the best 'behavior analysis' channel. You can really feel that it's about being fair, thorough, and not trying to sensationalize!
Because she was looking for approval. That’s not odd or weird. It’s not odd or weird to crave acceptance.
@@StonedBarbiee Indeed, except... when she actually brushed OFF all the acceptance she had from her blood family (mother, father, half-siblings) in order to wreck their lives, and make her own little "Fairy Tale" with Prince Harry... I mean, if she was really desperate for acceptance, why didn't she stick with her family, or one of her OTHER two husbands?
I am 40 years old and I still try to live in a way that makes my mom and dad proud. Maybe that is similar in her case. I also try to live in a way that makes my mother-in-law proud of me. I do everything I can but not to the extent that I would lose I sent of myself in the process. And maybe that's what she did too.
She didn't try to make em proud. Compared to other working royals She's put in 5 minutes. Did she try to make them proud in the Oprah interview or the curtsy mocking?
She tried to take control, she was shamed and "tried to make them proud" is her ego
Exactly!
She wipes away a non-tear!
My first time seeing your video and I love your whole body language breakdown about them. But I have to say that I could not feel sorry for Harry regarding the meme of him on a dog leash. Compared to how he, and his wife horrifically treated his grandparents, the late Queen Elizabeth and the late Prince Phillip in their final years, I have no sympathy for either one of them!!
Harry says “ that conversation I will never share.” Then immediately shares it.
He smiles. It's funny for him. Maybe she was the one who asked.
and previously shared it with meghan since she told us about it first, lol. it's like when he said "no one knows the truth. i know the truth, the institution knows the truth, the media knows the truth". i got a good giggle out of that one
He’s literally so stupid.
😂
NO ONE, and I repeat No one knows the real truth! I know the truth! My family members know the truth, the media knows the truth, Meghan knows, Billy knows, the newspapers know and so yes know one knows the truth.
He then gives a look and gesture, that is asking "would U like to know?"
Thank you, Spidey, for your unbiased analysis! You are my favorite behavior analyst!! This is my conclusion. Having seen a man being gaslighted and after watching your analysis, I have found following patterns: 1. She makes him feel that he needs to protect his family. 2. Family means wife and kids, the rest are suddenly the ones who want to hurt them. 3. She victimizes herself, so that he feels that she needs to be protected. 4. Separates him from his family so that they cannot have an influence on him anymore. 5. Make him believe that he is the one making the decisions. That is how you gaslight a man.
Forgot one point: make him think she is just like his mother
But Harry’s desire to get out of the UK has been well documented for a decade before he ever met Meghan. As an adult he has always been clear about his desire to live away from the UK because of his desire to distance himself from the British Media.
As far as Meghan choosing him because he was essentially her mark, there is also evidence to back up her claims that she wasn’t all that familiar with the royal family and more specifically Harry himself. She was asked in an interview to basically “pick” either William or Harry and she clearly didn’t know enough about either of them to make a choice. And that was just months before meeting him.
@@mackenziedubs4175 Harry always felt his life would be in Africa, but that didn't suit his wife. The life he is living now is her choice, not his but I think he thinks it was his choice.
Also, cry all the time because that is what his mother did.
@@mackenziedubs4175 so she didn't know her idol Diana had two sons and didn't watch Williams Catherine's wedding come off it
As to her crying, there is a video where she shows off her ability to cry on demand. She says okay, tear, left eye. Go. And she shows how she can immediately make herself cry. She is a decent enough actress to have mastered this skill so her crying here is probably as fake as everything else. Let’s not forget her crying at the queens funeral from just her left eye because she really had to fake emotion there. In this video she is of course portraying a victim and believes she is a victim so conjuring up that tear then creating more wasn’t as difficult because she was crying for herself. Just think it through.
Well said!
The photo at the Queens funeral was a deliberate photo op as she was looking straught into the camera. It was almost like a portrait.
Except the threat against her were real and confirmed by police. Who wouldn’t be upset by that. I think the tears were real in that part.
It’s very creepy !! She is acting her entire life!
I think she had a substance on her glove that cause her eye to water... Check it out... You can see that she "wiped" her eye right before her tear/s came out. 🙄
Brilliant breakdown of those most damning 'claims' during the Oprah interview. You've managed to prove the utter cruelty those two practice on a regular basis. My dislike of Harry's wife stems solely from her disgusting behaviour and treatment of pretty much everyone. Skin colour is irrelevant. She could be purple with green polkadots for all I care. I judge people according to their treatment of every living creature and she fails this behaviour spectacularly.
The thing Harry never recognizes in these circumstances ( Philip's funeral) is that his father (and the rest of the family) was grieving the death of his grandfather. Everything they said or did during that period would have been influenced by that. Harry makes it all about himself. Truly sad and completely unempathetic.
Very happy you're covering these two pair of twits. The UK has a lot of shame regarding these two, I hope they get exposed furthermore.
Give spidey your time and viewership, don't support these two in their endeavors.
What kind of username is that
Like many I was taken in by this woman , unfortunately she didn't hide her duplicity long enough ! I see an underlying smirk in her "smile "!
What have C and W got to apologise for? I would like him to explain this.
I just.. about the "how dark your baby is going to be" ... my best friend married an American girl, she's very black and he is very white.. when she was pregnant with they're child (the most beautiful baby girl in the world), she was always talking about and wondering the baby would turn out more dark or light, because she had friends that were bi-racial and none of the kids are same shade, which is wonderful, and when she was talking about it I told her about another bi-racial couple that I know of that were the daughter is blond and very light but her older brother not.... It is natural to wonder how an expected baby will look like even if you're same race.. if it's going to be red hair like the dad or green eyes like mom.. all parents wonder how their baby will look like. ... But I understand it is uncomfortable when others do the same, specially when you don't know what the motivation lies there back..... I just think it was blown out of proportions .
It’s such a common thing to wonder about what a child will look like. Whether it’s skin color, hair and eye color or whatever all based on what the parents look like. Making an issue where there isn’t one.
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻❤
How dare you state the obvious
Lol
My son in law is Asian, African American and Micronesian. My daughter is white. His mother who is a black woman initiated a conversation with me about how dark our soon to be born grandchild would be. Perfectly normal conversation. They are just attention seeking.
@@virginiadrews908 Chris Rock just confirmed this.
I can't tell you how happy I am that you covered the actual dialogue between Meghan and Oprah. Since it aired I've been questioning the whole back and forth. Especially the exact (and vague) wording Meghan used. (And I know I'm not alone on this.) It was very suspect to me and seemed Meghan had chose her words very carefully. Which bothered me a lot because it came off disingenuous. Manipulative even. So I really appreciate you addressing it. 👌
If you want an analysis on purely dialogue, then I recommend Martin Decoder on youtube. He solely analyses transcripts/speeches/interviews and he's done many on Meghan. It's fun to see what he finds in the dialogue and her choice of words and how it corresponds to the body language that we learn about from Spidey and the Behavior Panel. Martin has a dry sense of humour and a matter-of-fact voice. He's very informative and clearly explains his findings and documents them well.
My thought on this was that she probably knew it was a sensitive topic and something that Harry didn't want to get into, so she was treading lightly. It's like covering your butt so that when someone comes back to say she was crying racism (which they did), she could say 'well I never said that'.... not saying it's right or wrong, but I do get it
@@skwerl81 Let me first apologise in advance; this reply is rather long, so I totally understand if you don't want to read it! Sorry!!
I see your viewpoint and I understand it, because that is what my first impression was too. However, if there was a topic that Meghan knew Harry didn't want to discuss, then she shouldn't have mentioned it in the first place. It doesn't make sense to comment on something that you'll be unwilling to elaborate on further in an interview. In terms of accusations of any kind, vagueness will only cause misunderstandings and confusion.
The confusion on the topic of racism has been so huge that Kerry Kennedy handed the couple an award for "fighting institutional racism within the royal family".
It doesn't make sense that the couple vaguely hints at racism in the Oprah interview and the documentary, and also accepts an award, but now Harry is out doing his own interviews, where he's blaming everyone else for misunderstanding Meghan's vague hints about racism.
In terms of body language, it's interesting to see how stiff Harry is during the Tom Bradley interview, where he says that Meghan never mentioned racism. Harry is red in the face, he looks incredibly uncomfortable, like he's holding in a toxic fart. And Tom looks like he just saw Harry grow a second head. I really hope that Spidey analyses that interview, I would love to hear what he makes out of that scene! It's all a mess, in my humble opinion.
Again, sorry for the long reply!!
@@Iram_Ali I love Martin Decoder! He also has a really interesting video where he discusses similarities between Meghan Markle and Amber Heard. It's fascinating
@@Chicasueca79 Yes, I think I saw that one! Martin has just uploaded a new video, where he analyses Harry's interview with Colbert. I have avoided that particular interview, because I don't think I'll be able to handle the cringe! But see if you can ;)
Good actress? That's rather generous. At her best, she was only a C list actress that could only play roles that mirrored her own personality.. and it's on record that Meggie is able to cry on cue (they talked about it on the Royal News Network)... but what makes that scene most telling that she's completely full of crap? Watch Harry's reaction while she's talking. There's a whole lot of nothing going on.
Its really easy to see when they are not telling the truth....their lips move. 😅
I love that this is a space where we can objectively analyze, "Yeah, this person behaves deceptively, inauthentically, and has acted as a bully" while still choosing to preserve our own humanity and theirs, by not attacking or bullying them.
same!! its so refreshing
totally agree!
Spidey has chops and class.
Apsolutely x
Absolutely, that's the way Spidey likes it too which is awesome!
At the end Harry was SEEKING apologies-- with no thought of OFFERING any apology or regret!
I do not believe taking photos of sleeping children in their private rooms is 'doing everything' to fit into the family!
My son is a detective and gets lied to for a living. The direction your eyes look when you are thinking is a Big indicator of wheather you are being truthful when answering a particular question
There was a very serious accusation of racist comment allegedly made by one of the royal family member during this interview but my problem with her accusation was the vagueness of her accusation without context of the conversation or naming of the specific perpetrator noted in the accusation. For example, a mixed race family often will speculate on the hair colour, skin colour, the eye colour of the baby without any sinister intent. Speculating the skin colour does not mean that it was racist. Did they twist the context to make it sound more sinister than it actually is? The reason that I am bringing this up is because, she has done that twisting the truth, misleading the audience to fit her victim narrative repeatedly through out the interview. She had more than 10 factual inaccuracies through out the interview. Another concern with this point of racism accusation is the fact that Meghan gave the account of having multiple conversations about Archie’s skin colour during the pregnancy but Harry’s account of this is different from Meghan. He stated that it was only one conversation prior to their marriage and he was even vague about it by changing the subject to the fact that his family wanted Meghan to continue to act because there was not enough money for her. So I wonder on accuracy or truthfulness of their accusation. Both of them proved to be misleading with a lot of their later statements and in my view, if you lie once a lot of your claim’s credibility gone out the window.
I also do not believe that the British senior royal family members are racist. Both Charles and William are well travelled and have met countless people from all different walks of life including world leaders, people of different ethnic background. With those experiences came worldly wisdom and knowledge. Prince Phillip famously poured a glass of cordial to the black White House butlers and had a conversation as equals to those butlers. The Queen is a friend of Nelson Mandela and famously had direct line of contact with him whenever one wants to talk to the other. Both the Queen and Prince Phillip have danced with black leaders and hosted events to black Commonwealth leaders over the years to this days. They are all busy with their own schedules that include royal engagements, Duchy’s financial dealings, learning the rope for the future monarchical role, decision makings regarding modernising monarchy, looking after their own young family in the case of William. Their plate is full with things to be concerned with already that they have no time to worry about Harry’s and his biracial wife’s baby skin colour for which they cannot change or do anything about. It is just absurd to suggest what Meghan suggested in the OW interview.
Another thing to note is that the royal family allowed Harry to marry a biracial woman who is as light as a Caucasian and yet the royal family is supposed to be concerned with the colour of the baby who will be lighter than his/her mother by logic. I mean what will be the point of the royal family concerning over the baby’s skin colour when they already accepted the biracial mother into the family knowing that she will have a baby to Harry? It just does not make sense.
There was an insinuation that Archie was not given the title prince and HRH due to possibility of his skin colour. That is a total BS. The thing is Archie not being given the royal title is due to 100 year old George V protocol and it is nothing to do with his skin colour. George V protocol states that only up to grandchildren of the Reigning Monarch and in direct line to the throne thereafter is allowed to have HRH and prince title. Archie as a great grandchild is not eligible for the title. Even I can understand that and Meghan as a somewhat smart person should understand that very easily. She twisting things is very clear with this.
There was also insinuation that Archie was not given protection due to his skin colour. Again, Meghan twisting things to suit her own agenda. Andrew’s 2 daughters do not get royal protection, so as Princess Anne’s and Prince Edward’s children. It is not surprising that Harry’s children will not get royal protection either as he is not direct line to the throne. Yes it is harsh but it is the monarchical system and Harry should be aware of that since he was born into the system. Again nothing to do with Archie’s skin colour.
Meghan stated that she only wanted Archie to get the title prince so that he can have security. Again, Eugenie and Beatrice are titled princesses and HRH and yet they are not eligible for royal security protection. Princess Anne and Prince Edward(Count of Wessex) have prince and princess titles and HRH and yet they only have the royal security while doing royal duties/public engagement and not 24/7 security. The decision of who get the security in the royal family is not made by the royal family themselves but from the Royal Committee for the Metropolitan Police department. This discussion about Archie not getting the security linked to his skin colour should not have been made from the start as that decision is nothing to do with the royal family. This security was provided courtesy of the UK tax-payers and after they chose to step back from positions of working for the people of the UK as working royals, they are not entitled to the security.
There is also insinuation that Royal family was racist. If that is the case then, I don’t understand why would Prince Charles spent $3million out of his own pocket to pay for their extravagant royal wedding with the blessing of the Queen and walked Meghan down the aisle. It would have been easier to disagree to the wedding from the start. They were given royal titles as a wedding gifts. No privileges were spared to them. She was the first fiancee along with her mum Doria to spend Christmas at Sandringham with the royal family and the first royal woman to go on royal train with the Queen for royal engagement mere weeks after her wedding. Even Kate, future Queen Consort, was not given these privileges. Some very ungrateful and disgraceful 2 some.
Excellent post. Thank you.
Thank you. Very interesting points. One other advantage to Meghan and Harry by the RF is that she was allowed to stay with Harry at Balmoral BEFORE they were married. This was unprecedented, if I remember rightly, as a Christian family and more specifically the Queen being the head of the Church of England -‐ this must have been a difficult decision for all concerned but she decided in Meghan's favour.
It's all BS by MM to get attention. She has no talent. All she has is to complain. Same goes with Harry.
I loved watching the banter between queen Elizabeth and nelson Mandela, his last visit he wasn't coming to the formal dinner, the queen said set a place for him, when it came to sitting down, nelson didn't look at the seating arrangement, he sat down next to the queen, I was double up laughing. The queen spends 30 minutes speaking to whomever on the left then turn to who ever is on the right. The queen couldn't get away from him too speak to anyone else. The queen loved him and had plenty of respect for him as he did for her. How those 2 rotten scandalous people could put it around that they were racist. They were both ill, Harry and Megan speeded up there death that's how much he loved his grandparents. False tears and sniffing what a pair of hypnagogic twonks. I detest them, they didn't want titles for the children not to have them labeled. Soon changed your mind. They don't mean anything in the USA
@@elainebowditch6610 Karma is biting them in the bottom. They are now pariah and everything they touch is turning to dust.
Yep. Every word she says is finger nails on the black board. I can honestly say, I was a huge supporter at first. But it was short lived. I don’t know why she can’t understand how hurtful she is.
Can’t you see how hurtful people are towards her? Read the comments .
@@susanmetz9892 What comments? Do you think people are “hurtful” for no reason? What is your defense of Ms. Markle?
@@susanmetz9892 imagine condemning apartheid and speaking out against racism, or your husband not wanting to introduce his award to an apartheid ruled regime, yet dying believing that the world thought you were racist.
Narcissists know they're hurting others, they just don't care. In their minds (and I think this is very true of Meghan) they have a self-serving victimhood mentality that allows them to be cruel and horrible to others with no remorse because "they hurt me first" - when nobody actually hurt them, they just didn't give them exactly what they wanted.
Narcissistic Personality Disorder. That's how she can do it. And that's how she truly believes every version of her truth every time, no matter how inconsistent with previous versions.
Harry wasn't a narc originally, but he was over-emotional and an easy mark. He is in a very bad situation. He was always over-emotional but now he's more paranoid than ever. He is not in a good place. I just hope his wife can stay on that high pedestal he placed her on. If she doesn't live up to his "saint mummy" ideals, I'll be worried for her. I hope they'll be ok.
From the moment i saw the “crazy about Harry” magazine cover, i knew she was a fake and disingenuous. When i noticed the stories about her adopting Diana’s perfume, i was done. Then her repeated rebuff of acting with the decorum the Queen insisted on have tagged her credibility from which there is no return
“She never told him they should leave”, but she certainly LED him to choose this.
Allegedly they already planned their departure before the weddings( 3 days before the spectacle for the public)when they had Netflix signed them up...
Hi Spidey, there's actually a video clip of Meghan showing off her "cry-on-demand" skills on set, as when her director tells her "Meghan--one tear, left eye. Go!" After you see that you'll understand why it's hard to be sympathetic. Doubtless she's had her share of difficulties, but nothing that would justify all the lies and misleading comments they've put out.
Megan seems like the sort of girl who constantly needs to be the center of attention, regardless of the setting. Like it'd be your birthday and she'd somehow make it all about her and her "struggles".
Like someone that announces her pregnancy at your wedding
@@hsmd4533 👏👏👏👏👏👏
@@hsmd4533 mic drop right there! 👏
Her constant "Tsunami " of words gets on my nerves. A person can say so much more with fewer words.
She IS a Leo🤷🏼♀️🤣
She's like William Shatner with that chuckle/smile. Except we love William Shatner.😂
But Meghan Markle commented that she was never treated as a“black woman“ and that was never around black people. How can we understand this element of race here? Please expalain.
What also makes it hard to believe is that every single time we see her crying (Netflix, the Late Queen's funeral, Oprah...) you stop a bit and focus, it is ALWAYS 1 tear on the left eye. And there is a video of her saying how easy it is for her to do that...
Rub a bit of Vick menthol inhalation balm near the eyelid and the harmless irritation causes tears to lubricate it away. Need the other eye unaffected to see where you are going. It's an old acting trick!
Also, if you study film - the way they play (shoot) the Oprah scene creates a sense of helplessness on behalf of the protagonist. Placing the scene in boxes or squares - it suggests a sense of being overwhelmed or trapped and not being seen - re not seeing Oprah’s face. Just such a strong sense of manipulation.
Wow love this
Totally!! The whole documentary was shot this way. This is from a film studies professor online >> Short-siding
>> The cinematography contributes to the viewers feelings. The way Doria is framed is called 'short siding' - she is pushed into the side of the frame, and rather than having 'looking space' in front of her, she is confined. It's used to give the audience an uneasy feeling - uncomfortable and claustrophobic. Used when the director wants the character to feel oppressed or boxed in.
I have a BA in Film Analysis. I'm working on my masters in film now. It's almost impossible to take media/news seriously when they start intentionally using psychological shots. It becomes textbook propaganda. I found you during the Depp trials when it was clear the media was padding the narrative for Herd. It's frustrating for the average person to be pandered to. It's so comforting to watch a behavioral arts expert dissect the pieces of the narrative producers, directors, and editors can't completely control. I literally seek out your videos for this reason! Spidey is the reason Eisenstein preferred blank faces in his cuts lol.
Wow, thanks for this insight, hadn't thought of this
I haven't watched the Netflix or read any of the books and I won't. I'm only watching this because your voice is soothing. I close my eyes. I'm trying to get some sleep. I'm exhausted from Trauma.
I think it’s funny that Harry is saying they moved to an Island to escape from paparazzi, and then it immediately cuts to them filming themselves and each other for their Netflix show.
“It’s an island “. Yes. So is Taiwan - about the same size What a ridiculous statement. So he thinks we don’t t have journalists/ magazines/newspapers/ tv on Vancouver Island???
@@jemDstables they should go to a real deserted island and be quiet
Attention-seeking, money-making, gas-lighting ingrates!
Thank you, Spidey. I love your demeanor. Always professional even when you are talking about ludicrous people.
As MM, herself, has said “One tear, left eye, GO!”
And did you notice that, while she was “crying” there was a SINGLE tear from her LEFT eye!! And when she dramatically wiped her eyes she somehow missed wiping away that tear, allowing the camera to conveniently catch it! I’m sorry to say that I do not believe a single thing she says though, at first, I adored her.
Funny because most body language experts , and you do notice it, there’s a physical and change in breathing right before you cry and when crying…that’s why many people need a “ moment”, …..so yeah, completely fake.
Please as a British person is very distressed by what Harry has said about his family. Just look at photos which he wasnt aware were being taken, usually with Catherine and William. He said he saw her as his sister. No one employed in the palace would ever be allowed and Harry knows it. The way Harry has told lies about his childhood, e.g. his father never rode a bike with him. There are litterally dozens of them with much laughter.
She never wanted to be part of the family because the Royal Family was just a stepping stone to her becoming famous,
In the clip where she is crying, all I see is her acting. There is a clip of her in an interview where she is asked about crying for her role or on set. MM actually brags that she can cry on command, and does it in that interview, but she said something about it being her left eye. A lot of people commented on this when she was seen with one tear coming from her left eye at Queen Elizabeth's funeral. In the clip here, the tear is from her left eye and she moved some of the moisture over to her right, which is a little glassy but no actual tear falls.
Vancouver Island isn't an isolated little hamlet. It has a population of over 800,000 people and is home to Victoria, British Columbia's Capital city. Still, it is quite vast in geographical area, approximately 12,000 square miles, 1/4 the size of England. They were asked to leave Canada because the Government didn't want to pay for their security anymore.
I also thought the Vancouver Island comment was odd. Maybe it's not as well known for people who don't live in Canada, or even some of the States, (but you would think you'd want to research an abroad city where you planned to live) but like.... a lot of things are filmed in that area of B.C -- of course there's going to be paparazzi there. They should have tried the island off of the other coast if they wanted the 'it's an island' kind of island.
@@fallen0angel
They count on the ignorance of their audience, who, as it turns out, is not nearly as ignorant as they would have liked.
They weren't asked to leave Canada. We, the citizens were pissed and did a government petition demanding we stop paying for their security. They chose to go to LA and secretly flew just before Canada mandated Covid lockdown
When he says “it is an island” like they were stranded on a deserted island!
Great point almost like Manhattan is an island….
Thank you so much for making this. I learned a lot. Also you have a great and engaging way of presenting your content! There is just one thing I would like to add. People who are very narcissistic or actually have NPD believe their own version of being the victim and of being treated unfairly with a very very deep conviction. Meaning: in that particular moment, she really felt the dread that her kids might nor be safe. Which of course also means she might treat them very poorly within 20 minutes of this. Because narcissism deals with threats and 'information' on a moment to moment basis. I think that factors into the behavior we see with her.
I don't believe they were ever bullied. Rich and powerful, don't want to talk about that..
This video is more entertaining than the actual documentary
It's interesting to me, that whoever butchered that interview with Oprah, didn't think anyone would do what you did and watch the whole thing again (your reaction to doing that was hilarious, I had to pause just so I could laugh 😂) and find out what was really said. Very interesting. People crack me up.
I read a comment on one of his videos that he hasn’t done his research. Then this video comes out that shows, not only has he done his research but he has watched the Oprah interview enough damn times that he instinctively knew that that answer and question didn’t go together 😂 😂. I wish I can find that comment and just link this portion.
His reaction has been my emotions for the past 5-6 years, it’s so relatable 😂
Remember how they also butchered QE2’s inaugural speech, and took out the reference to “life devoted to service” and just make it sound like “devoted to building the commonwealth” so they can sell their embellished narrative of the UK and the Queen as colonizer? Sick!
So many lies. Megaliar. 😡 She used to call him MY HUSBAND, but recently it was THIS ONE. So she doesn't care at all about his royal blood! She also demeaned our late Queen by always referring to her as HIS GRANDMOTHER - yet heaven help those who don't call her the DUCHESS!
I saw through the fakenes from the very beginning, the engagement interview.
He's fantasizing about Roylas having anything to do with publication of her letter but doesn't mind his publication of private messages from his sister-in-law in his book. Sick.
My husband is an editor and he has made me question the authenticity of any media interviews. As an editor, it is very easy to make people say something that they have never said, for better or worse. So I watch doco’s like this without much expectation of truth, because we are seeing the narrative that the editor has put together to support the client’s need/desire. I also don’t trust that people’s recollections of past events are accurate and unbiased, so I am sceptical of Harry’s memoir as well. I don’t like Harry & Megan purely for the media circus they keep feeding and harping on. How they conduct themselves has really not endeared themselves to me. In the end that is the only way I can judge them by. I do love the fact that you take the centre line approach, trying to look at it from an unbiased perspective. Its a breath of fresh air.
I completely understand this. But then, if we can't trust reporting or firsthand accounts, how are we ever to know whether any type of program/show/book/news report, or anything at all, is real?
@@ChrisW228 I wish more people did know. Maybe then so many people wouldn't be so quick to judge others and so harsh in doing so.
Your mean like when William was quoted as saying, “ we are very much not a racist family “?
@@ChrisW228 the BBC is rather upsetting in it's bias now. I don't think it's a left/right bias. It's a bias of money changing hands. Many reporters have marriages or relations to people who are in industries that can stand the make money from various things. Many politicians have ties to media.
Even though politicians are involved - it's not a left/right agenda. It's classist - the people with the power and the money stand to gain or lose the most from stances in the media.
They've entered the media circus because they know there will be a circus with or without their consent, so they might as well control the narrative. Also, if they're to leave the monarchy they need to support themselves financially.
Megan Markle and Amber Heard are twins!!!
This makes me believe even more that they were thrown out. So maybe he isnt lying about it not being her idea to leave. lol
When Megan was talking about the threats on her life, Harry was just sitting there listening to her like she's just telling someone about her vacation or something. He had no expression that most husbands would have as their wife was talking/reliving about a horrible experience. He's not holding her hand or putting his hand on her back or even looking pained that she experienced such a horrible situation. Not interrupting and saying something comforting. He's just sitting there listening to her like it's the first time he's heard this. He seemed to do that alot.
But nothing happened anyway. Harry's probably seen families living in dangerous war zones with threats to their lives everyday, who have to take it in their stride.
It's pretty rare for a celebrity to be murdered in this way. And they could afford good security. Plus I'm sure the police or secret service or whatever would investigate it quickly.
@@niccolea2086 yes I was just saying it's a more common than people think. It's often the celebrities that become famous overnight but find high security bills a bit out of their budget as they may have only done one movie, that feel very vulnerable when there are death threats.
Harry and Meghan had the protection of the secret service while they were in Britain, strange they went to America during this time if they were at such high risk.
They could be used to all that
William and Catherine have received more than usual simply BECAUSE of what vindictive things H & M are spouting . No mention here that Princess Catherine is a mother of three young children...and I've heard it reported that the Sussex sugars do not leave the children out of threats
You would have thought he would touch her arm to comfort her . I think anyone who is in the presence of someone who disclosed their emotional pain would make an attempt to console them - step up Harry - you are suppose to adore this woman .
While I agree with you on bullying, media mockery has been a fact of life for public figures quite literally for centuries. By focusing on it, complaining about it in interviews and trying to control what is said about him and his wife, Harry is giving it a credibility it would not otherwise have. He is feeding the monster he claims to hate.
Agree. For years the comics "bully" others. They're supposed t befunny depending how people interpret them.
Well especially when you give them all the fodder to work with. He lost control of the situation which led to him to be ridiculed. He was enjoying having her punch out the people he wanted to take down. He did not have the strength to deal with his life. Now he is so delusional he now believes his child hood trivial complaints. He is in so deep he does not know he is heading down instead of out of the hole.
Isn’t that the truth…but what choice as can you see her as the raging narcissist. Lord you get a slight sight of her rage hate occasionally…that’s why she not this innocent sweet victim. Harry all but admitted her abuse to staff….but the jerk calls it constructive criticism! They both downplay, not take accountability, and project on others their horrid abuse actions and behaviors! Yet, the slightest discernment of them they totally lose it…..wanting to be pampered and put up on a unreasonable and undeserved pedestal!
Well, actually they both been abusive to others…not just her. The fact they both think that’s alright is disgusting!
They don’t care about being in the media, they’re hey crave it more than air. They just cannot stand the fact they can’t control what is sad, hence their media hate and lies campaign. They aren’t trying to hold anyone accountable table, they want absolute Goebles style control. They’re evil.
Hi,if they didn't say the family were racist, why did they accept the award for standing up to racism. That always get left out. So frustrating how they twist things.
Absolutely no racism against Meghan in British papers. It’s in her head. If you say there is - please print the link. (Nobody hitherto has been able to). There was one article written by an American writer who worked for the Daily Mail and it was titled Straight out of Compton but absolutely nothing else. All the racist headlines shown on Oprah were from American, Australian and international publications. The headlines were also doctored.
My wife and I are from the same country. I'm dark and would pass as a black person. My wife is light as a very light skinned Asian. People have asked us how our kids would turn out in regards to their complexion. . Even people who don't know us and our heritage from all different cultures. They are just genuinely curious. Also mixed colored babies are usually really good looking. So usually people ask in a complimentary way. It doesn't mean malice in the question in itself. As it could go either way. But usually the lighter side. We get a lot of looks and stares. But it's because she's tall and good looking, like really good looking and I'm short and fat. So I'm sure they're just wondering how I punched above my weight class. Hehe not racial.
I think the problem is that Meghan and Harry said the word "concern".... "They were concerned about how dark his skin would be". The word concern is the problem which heavily implies racism because why would anyone be "concerned" over someone's skin. Without the word concern it's a whole different context really
@@bethanyraynor3121I think the trouble is that we have no way of knowing what was said, by whom it was said, or what they meant by it. We only have H&Ms word that anything was even said at all and given how many lies they’ve been easily caught out on I don’t think we can draw any conclusions at all unless, and I think this is unlikely, someone from the RF speaks out.
But hot on the heels of Meghan using the word “concern” when Harry joined Meghan and Oprah in their interview Oprah used the word ‘racism’ and Harry and Meghan didn’t contradict her. They didn’t say “Oh, no, we don’t think it was racism. Not at all.” They let Oprah mention racism without contradiction so they’re definitely guilty of accusing the RF of being racist, even if Meghan or Harry didn’t use the word racism.
Literally no one has asked that of me or my partner. We’re different ends of the melanin spectrum.
Very true. I have a fair skinned, blue eyed, freckled father. My mother is a very melanin blessed, black eyes, black hair Latina. When she was expecting me, everyone discussed what I would look like. No malice or worry involved.
I came out looking like my father. Now when I was expecting my children, many family members joked about the possibility of my children being born looking like what most people expect a typical Latino/a. Again, no malice. Just curiosity about how genes would be expressed.
I will not deny that colorism is rampant in cultures. However, I can say that none of my children are loved less based on their physical features.
Anyone else see the clips of Megan proudly stating that she could cry on demand? That directors and producers would say “Megan, left eye, one tear-GO!” And her response was essentially very *proud* that she could produce tears…on command. Basically, her response was “ok gimme a second” and she would produce tears 😂
I’m not outwardly disagreeing with what was said in this video, but I did think it was funny that that clip has surfaced and I saw it again right before watching this video.
Always one tear left eye.
same like the tear in the funeral of late queen...
Exactly what she did at QE ll's funeral. Made sure she was facing the camera's.
Well, if I don't perceive a lump in the throat with the attendant swallowing along with WATER running down the cheeks, and a choked-up voice, then I don't accept that crying is being done. How is it that only one eye is going to let go the lachrymal fluid? I have seen her run her finger under her eye and behold, here's a tear. Obviously some kind of massaging.
Yes I've seen that!
Your knowledge of documentary production and specifically of propagandist techniques is impressive-and an eye opener of how we’re being deceived. Now I really hate them-and I’m not alone.
I feel for the BRF.
Thank you for your analysis.
As an actress. She can cry. When needed.
Great thing about Harry is that he doesn't have a poker face, you can literally see his stress. I'm bad at body language, but it's so easy for me to read Harry. That interview with Tom Bradley was so interesting, because Harry looked like he was desperately holding in diarrhea. He's complexion also gives him away, he turns red very easily, when he's stressed.
I would love it if you analyzed Harry's interviews for his book, but I totally understand if you want to move on to other people.
Thank you so much for doing the entire documentary, you are unbelievably cool!!
Dear Spidey, I recently saw a video about MM where she, herself, explains how easy it is for her to drop tears in front of the camera! She said that she needs 30 seconds, then camera, roll, tear, left eye! So... it seems that it is not hard for her to fake emotions...
Thank you for your analysis, it's always a delight to hear from you!
Don’t just assume that since Meghan has been trained to cry on camera that ALL of her tears are fake. She’s a human had has real emotions.
I can believe that. But that 30 seconds is key. A lot of actors need a bit to step into an emotion. Let me put it this way. In those 30 seconds, I wouldn’t be surprised if she’s focusing on death threats on her to make her cry. It’s not a reach to assume death threats would actually make her really sad. 😊
Both my daughters could do that and so I have discovered , can a grandson and a granddaughter .
@@TheBehavioralArts It actually wasn't 30 seconds, it was 3. Her own words, not mine. “Oh, I can do that so well. Oh my God, it’s crazy. They’re like Meghan, one tear, left eye, go! Give me three seconds.” Look it up yourself, don't trust my word. This commenter got the quote wrong. She might have exaggerated, sure. She might be able to fake it and still shed real tears, sure. But that's the truth of what she said and the true quote is three seconds, not thirty.
Saw a funny edit of Meghan in a video a while back.
Her in front of the church after Queen Elizabeth II funeral with one single tear in her left eye.
Then cut to an old interview with Meghan laugh and flipping her hair saying. 'Omg I that so well! Omg it's crazy! Like Meghan, one tear, left eye, Go!'
😂
Wow. You are so methodical and analytical. Your attention to detail is amazing, but you're also very fair. I also enjoy the context you provide when dissecting this matter. Looking forward to your other work.
How anyone could be scamboozled by this pair when their faces clearly spell "p-o-s-e-r-s" is beyond me.