Thanks for watching guys. My favourite film point and shoot of all time is the Ricoh GR-1 because I bought it for myself to use on my honeymoon back in 1998. I used the camera until it finally broke a couple of years ago. I'm still hoping I can revive it back to life. My favourite digital point and shoot was the Canon SD700is, not because it was great, but because I had a lot of great memories from it. It was so small and compact I took it with me everywhere. What's your favourite point and shoot camera and why?
The Canon G16 is my go to point and shoot digital compact camera. Mainly for the combination of size, lens range and fast aperture. On the compact film front, I use a Yashica T4, Olympus Trip, Canon A1
bigheadtaco - Could you make a real world comparison between the X100F and this Leica? I'm thinking of buying one or the other but cannot make a decision. I would assume the bigger sensor size would be an advantage but does the micro four-thirds hold up in low light conditions?
@@rajkhosla9066 The Fujifilm X100F will do better in lowlight versus the D-Lux 7, but you can also zoom with the D-Lux so depending on what you're photographing, you can get 'better' photos if you need to zoom in.
For those wondering if "buying the Leica instead of the Panasonic is worth the extra cost", here is the bottom line: Colors science, styling and warranty aside, you buy the Panasonic and when you resell it is worthless, or you buy the Leica and a few years later is worth the same, or with some luck to an interested collector, even more. So, always buy the Leica, take good care of it, enjoy it, keep the box and all the stuff inside as original, and you have money in the bank.
I have the Panasonic LX100 and it is by far the best travel camera one can own. Cell phones can't match it. The lens is one of the best I've ever used in terms of sharpness and clarity. It fits in a jacket pocket easily with a metal screw on cap. Not sure the Leica branded one is worth the extra cost, but they are equally brilliant cameras. There is not a single camera made that offers what this one does out of the box when considering the sensor size and lens combination.
Im considering going from my Canon 7D Mark II to this one! My use is more fashion, street and architecture. Do you think this would be beneficial? I love the smaller profile and «stealthy» looks
Thanks for the video. I had a D-LUX 4 titanium and used it for many years as my 'go to, with me all the time' camera... till I dropped it a short distance on a table and after that the lens wouldn't stay out after turning it on :-( Too much ¥ to repair and it was time for an up-date anyway. Replaced it with a GR and love that camrea to bits. I also have a Leica monochrom for more serious/creative/fun photography, but its not something I have with me all the time. With the GR showing its age - dust on the sensor, sticky shutter release, buttons - have been thinking about something new for that everyday-color. Have been waiting and had thought it would be the GR III to be coming soon, but this D-LUX 7 could be an alternitive. 24-75 is the perfect focal range, sensor is enough (although I'd been saying to myself nothing less than APS-C), manual controls, bluetooth and finder/nice rear touch screen, and [I hope] built well. BTW; for those that say its not worth the extra money over the Panasonic... For a couple hundred dollars... I'm from the USA but in Japan and the Panasonics here are only Japanese language menu. Leica has a 3 year guarantee (compared to 1 year for Panasonic). The Kyoto Leica Shop is a short train ride from me and any problems I have Leica Japan has taken very good care of me over the years. The red dot does have a 'premium' label to it and if I do ever decide to sell it (without droping it ;-) the resale value is higher (or atleast sellable). And... I like the styling of the Leica version, hay if I'm going to be carrying this around with me a lot, may as well enjoy it.
Thanks for sharing your experience. I also find the accessories are much nicer for the Leica. The currently available cases for the Typ 109 and 7 are amazing. And yes, depending on your country, typically the warranty is better for the Leica, especially if you travel or move. The warranty is international.
Yeah I'm thinking the same. The LX100 II is only a minor update to the LX100, but it's a minor update to what looks like a great, particularly well-rounded compact camera. And this Leica variant is just so timeless and nice looking. I shoot with a Fujifilm X-T1 and have said to myself that APS-C is the perfect compromise between quality and weight/size/cost... But this one looks very tempting. :) The micro 4/3 sensor ought to still distance itself comfortably ahead of even the latest generation of smartphone cameras although they keep getting better. I think 1" sensor cameras are about to get endangered especially with advancements of the photo post-processing engines and processing power in the smartphones.
Hi, I need some advice for a "definitive" family camera that brings out images with a certain three-dimensionality focused more on portraits of my fast-moving children. I currently have a Nikon z50 16-50 and 50-250 (sorry only for the small limited af area in Af-c and the lack of a 70-300 for football matches) and sometimes it annoys me to take my bag with me in contexts to go out with my family and to the sea. I need a compact camera that can be attached to a belt loop or that fits in a pocket. Probably the best solution would be to have a pocket compact and possibly a reflex or mirrorless camera that is not too small. I am undecided between the gr III x or fujifilm x100v or leica d-lux 7, pen-f, gx9, Canon RP + 50mm for the "definitive" portraits For shots of my family. I am looking for the most creative and fun camera that will entice me to take it with me regardless of whether it has beautiful filters and B&W. What would you recommend me? Thanks.
Hello, i have the new iphone pro max and i just ordered the d lux 7 as my first real camera. is it worth having in 2021? does it take way better pictures than the latest iphone?
Depends on what, but the new smartphones are very good right now. I think in lowlight and video, the iPhone ProMax will outshoot the DLux in many ways.... due to software enhancements. My feeling is you’ll need to go up to either the Panasonic GH series or Sony A7 series to see a noticeable difference, especially in lowlight situations. Plus, these won’t be straight out of camera footage. You’ll still need to work with these files in a proper video editing software.
I think this is a very thorough unboxing slash review, why the hate? Anyway, @bigheadtaco, currently I own PEN-F, which I think too bulky and heavy for travel/trip. Is it worth it to consider this one instead as replacement?
what a great unboxing video. leica really creates some of the most beautiful cameras! really enjoyed this, hope to see more. and thanks for sharing all this super dope content with us
Considering one of these, I used to have aFuji X series a few years ago, and loved using it. however since then just been using my iPhone ‘pro’ ☺️. For the price I guess I’ll need to consider if I’ll use it enough to warrant buying one, but there is something ‘special’ about using a dedicated camera albeit at this user level.
It's a beautiful camera for sure. For some it would be an idea travel camera. The quality is good enough for professional use, too. The lens might be fixed, but that leaf shutter sure is nice to have - even if you don't shoot with a flash, it's very quiet. You're right about the zoom - it should be stepped. Or, that should be an option in the menu. I still think that compacts cannot be replaced by phones, FWIW. Yes, the 2018 iPhones are amazing but even they, with all their computational advances, aren't as good as a modern camera like the D-Lux. Not even close. If you are giving Leica feedback, please tell them that they should be the first manufacturer to completely eliminate sliding apertures from their zoom lenses. It's bad enough for photography, but it's even worse for video. P.S. Nice flatlay!
The zoom is stepped, it's in the menu as an option when you set it up by configuring the lens' manual focus ring to be zoom instead. Fundamental that these reviewers actually read the manual and learn the camera before making videos like this but.. whatever. And yeah, one of the best small cameras ever made and Leica's last compact camera. A classic in the making.
basically the same. You're paying for the Leica branding and slight difference in external shell. I prefer the look of the Leica, but it comes down to how much the styling and branding is worth to you.
The Typ 109 is the best overall camera I own and I own a Sony A7 and a Fuji X100F. Street, travel, portrait, nature, landscape. There’s nothing the D-Lux cams can’t handle. Might have to own a D-Lux 7 or Lx100 mk 2
Bought one. All pictures come out severely over exposed (exposure compensation set at 0) with a blue tint. AWB, Auto-ISO, Auto-shutter and Aperature priority both in RAW and JPEG and JPEG fine. Even tried in full auto (little red button) and same bad result. Colours are way off and very cold and unnatural. Compared it by taking the same picture of the same scene, same camera setting with a D80 and and even with my Iphone and both came out way better. I am in no way an expert however GF is a pro and normally shoots with her Nikon. Se can't figure it out either. Something is off. Any thoughts?
Very odd, have you factor reset everything and try again? Also, have you made sure that even though you're in auto white balance, there is a feature that allows you to tweak the balance. Make sure that's zero. Also, did you make sure that it's not on any 'smart' exposure mode, just the standard Program Auto? Also, did you check the actual LCD and EVF setting, that it's not been adjusted? Make sure those are set to normal. Finally, did you actually upload the images to the computer to see if it looks the same? If you do this and it's still looking odd, you will have to contact Leica. Perhaps you have a faulty copy. Mine actually had really nice and neutral colours and exposure was really good.
I did do the factory reset to make sure I did not accidentally mess a setting up and all mentioned settings are on standard. They look horrible in Lightroom as well. Will contact Leica and see what they advise. Thank you for your reply. @@bigheadtaco
Between CL And D Lux 7, I love both, one is spinning wheel control, one is analog control, I like the analog control on D Lux but it’s not a real Leica and CL is, so I not sure if I should but D Lux 7 first because it’s like you buy a fake Leica but D Lux do will give me more things I can do, no lenses need to buy too and everything just good but probably pics not as good as CL, I don’t know, please help!
The CL will have superior resolution, build quality and flexibility, but of course you have to pay for this. If you have a few thousand dollars to invest, the CL is a good investment if you want to get into the Leica ecosystem at a reasonable price (for Leica). If not, the D-Lux will be your cheapest entry point into Leica digital.
Bigheadtaco, great video. Though I think you do a disservice to your great work by headlining it as just an unboxing. This is really more a review, and a very good one. You go deep into these type of great point and shoot cameras. Very good job. Please give us more. As for the D Lux 7, I will see if it can be my next camera. I have the small but brilliant Leica C typ 112. Amazing point and shoot that gives you spectacular images with that warm, classy Leica look. Will see if my next Leica is the D Lux or maybe some of the other Leicas. Take care.
Very good video after the unboxing! Are all the physical controls on the d-lux 7, the same as the type 109? In other words, if I buy the Kindle Photographers Guide to the D-lux type 109.....do you think it will it cover the the same features found on the d-lux 7? Unkei
I have a question: how about the colors of the Leica? Are those the same like with the Panasonic? I don't like the settings... Leica Q is so minimalistic!
Thanks Pretty compact the V-Lux 5 / LX100 II. Wondering if Leica/Panasonic-Lumix will update the advanced compact. A tilting screen like the one on the recent Fuji X100V could be interesting for this camera. Good, compact and discrete for street photography.
There's no optical or sensor difference between the Leica and Panasonic. Both are made by Panasonic in the same factory, most likely the same assembly line.
I understand the point of the D-lux. No complaints from me about it's existance. However - why not stick a Leica-like shell on the menu system? Surely that couldn't cost too much for a little more leica feel.
I don't think so, honestly. This is a Panasonic LX100 II with a rebranded case in reality, for $400 more. If you want a really small pocket size powerful camera, you should get the Ricoh GRIII. But if you don't mind a camera a little bulkier, the X100V is great on all aspects, just be aware it is not pocket size, maybe on a jacket or something but not on your pants, unlike the Ricoh.
Always liked these more compact cameras. Have a Fuji X10 - along with some Nikon stuff - that most of my favourite pictures have been made with. Was supposed to upgrade to a X40, but that never happened. My X10 are now starting to suffer from its age, and I can't find a new camera that fulfils my spec wishes …
Yes I know what you mean. I was hoping Fujifilm would try to compete against the Sony RX and Canon GxX series, but they decided to focus on the lower end ILC market instead.... I really did like the X30. The manual zoom was a great feature.
I don’t understand the d lux cameras, they’re just literally Panasonic cameras with no additional benefits for more money. It doesn’t even look premium or well built, it looks cheaply made, not a real Leica.
Leica has partnered with Panasonic to make them a profitable company. The 'real' Leica cameras don't make them enough money, and they don't have the money to make their own point and shoots, so they get other manufacturers to make them. Leica has been doing this since the 1970s. The Leica CL was made by Minolta, the Leica R series was co-developed with Minolta as well. All of Leica's film point and shoots were made by other manufactures (most Minilux's were made by Minolta). In the new digital age Leica has partnered with Panasonic. Without this partnership, my guess is Leica would not be profitable. Remember Leica has a total of 1600 global employees. They are a small time company trying to swim in a market with global giants like Sony, Canon, Panasonic, etc. Without these licensing deals (Panasonic's M43 lenses are labeled Leica but they really aren't) I think Leica will have the same fate as most other European camera manufacturers: bankrupt or bought out.
bigheadtaco I’m aware of that but at least the CL cameras could take Leica M glass and were well made in their own right. I’m asking why people would buy the non Leica cameras with the Leica dot, especially in the digital age. I’m not questioning why Leica does it, it’s a smart business move, I’m questioning why someone would buy one of these cameras especially over the cheaper Panasonic versions which are functionally identically.
@@owRekssjfjxjxuurrpqpqss for better or worse, people are brand loyal. They believe in what Leica stands for and are willing to support them. If it means paying a bit more for the same thing, it's okay. They don't want Leica to go out of business, but also they get something out of being a Leica consumer. There's a sense of premium when you buy a Leica. But this is for another subject, the idea of brand loyalty and value. But thanks for your thoughts. These discussions are important.
it's for posers. What Leica "stands for" is licensing out their name to make money because their business model doesn't work. Imagine if Ferrari started putting it's logo on a Fiat...oh wait, they did, back in the 1960s.The "Ferrari" Fiat Dino Coupe, and it's still sneered at by Ferrari fans.
I will make a comment on it soon. I was able to get some decent pictures with it, but for the price I really can’t recommend. I think the Panasonic LX100 mark II is a better value, but I was happy with the image quality.
I wish you would more of the kind of videos you used to do years ago, instead of these sort of inconsequential videos. I have always liked your work, but miss the old bigheadtaco who talked more of photography as art.
I'm still here. Did you see my street shootout in Hong Kong with Camera Film Photo or my tour of The Annex Photo in Toronto? Just remember those video takes weeks or months to produce. An unboxing video takes 1 day, and gets 10 times more views. I balance the need for views with the more difficult videos that get much less views, but I enjoy more. If all I did was interviews and travel videos, I'd produce about 10 videos a year. I also did some Two Minute Tuesday videos. Again, very low view count in comparison to my gear videos. I will continue doing them, but view counts and view minutes are important to me. I also only work with brands I like and review gear that I enjoy using. I've always reviewed gear and I've always done unboxing videos. If you consume all my content (website, Instagram, Twitter, FujiLove, Medium Format Magazine) you will see that RUclips is 10-15% of my entire ecosystem.
Finally, without high view videos, I get less opportunity to do the more fun videos I enjoy doing. Total amount of subscribers and views open up doors for me and my brand. I've never required anyone for money to view my own content, I don't do Patreon, so this is an important part of my brand. Without it, there will be no videos.
@@cnswanson7207 I don't know how long you've been following me, but thanks for your support. I also don't know if you only comment when you don't like something, or if you regularly comment on most of my videos. I'd like to know what videos of mine you enjoy and why specifically this video is what is making you think twice of leaving. Is it the camera that I'm reviewing? Am I doing too many unboxings? I am curious to know. Thanks if you have time to reply 👊🏼
Leica markets this as "the notepad"-camera to its professional clients. The truth is that this camera is made for (us) peasants who want a Leica, but can not afford one...
Basically, but the LX100 II is just shy below $1000, so it isn't cheap. Great deals on the original LX100 and X-Lux Typ 109 though. Same lens, different sensor.
Strong partnership between Panny and Leica. Leica has been rebadging Panny compacts for probably 10 years. I'm glad to see it continue and now evolve with L-Mount.
The Typ 109 is great. This is 20% better and after so many years, I think maybe the price point is a bit steep. Keep that 109 going, it's a digital classic!!
D-LUX 7 = TYPE 3952, as indicated on the bottom label. Now Leica uses TYPE instead of TYP. This new convention began with the C-LUX introduced a few months earlier.
I'd second that, and also add a updated GM1(kind of partial as I own one). Maybe add the updated 20mp sensor and if possible have the mechanical shutter when using flash be 1/100. I'm okay with 1/500s sans flash, but 1/50s a second with flash is just a bit too slow.
Man, you talk so much. I have never seen somebody to talk as much as you about a strap. Otherwise very knowledgeable and full of information but keep it shorter. You could actually submit this video to a film festival as a short film.
Thanks for watching guys. My favourite film point and shoot of all time is the Ricoh GR-1 because I bought it for myself to use on my honeymoon back in 1998. I used the camera until it finally broke a couple of years ago. I'm still hoping I can revive it back to life. My favourite digital point and shoot was the Canon SD700is, not because it was great, but because I had a lot of great memories from it. It was so small and compact I took it with me everywhere. What's your favourite point and shoot camera and why?
The Canon G16 is my go to point and shoot digital compact camera. Mainly for the combination of size, lens range and fast aperture.
On the compact film front, I use a Yashica T4, Olympus Trip, Canon A1
@@kiwipics I've always loved the Canon G Series. And T4? Epic!! Thanks for sharing!!
bigheadtaco - Could you make a real world comparison between the X100F and this Leica? I'm thinking of buying one or the other but cannot make a decision. I would assume the bigger sensor size would be an advantage but does the micro four-thirds hold up in low light conditions?
@@rajkhosla9066 The Fujifilm X100F will do better in lowlight versus the D-Lux 7, but you can also zoom with the D-Lux so depending on what you're photographing, you can get 'better' photos if you need to zoom in.
For those wondering if "buying the Leica instead of the Panasonic is worth the extra cost", here is the bottom line: Colors science, styling and warranty aside, you buy the Panasonic and when you resell it is worthless, or you buy the Leica and a few years later is worth the same, or with some luck to an interested collector, even more. So, always buy the Leica, take good care
of it, enjoy it, keep the box and all the stuff inside as original, and you have money in the bank.
"everyone dreams to have a Leica", what a beautiful piece of art and technology
I basically a Panasonic / Lumix LX100 with a Leica badge / red dot .. Not a true Leica, and the chespest resl leica it the X1 or X2.
I have the Panasonic LX100 and it is by far the best travel camera one can own. Cell phones can't match it. The lens is one of the best I've ever used in terms of sharpness and clarity. It fits in a jacket pocket easily with a metal screw on cap. Not sure the Leica branded one is worth the extra cost, but they are equally brilliant cameras. There is not a single camera made that offers what this one does out of the box when considering the sensor size and lens combination.
Im considering going from my Canon 7D Mark II to this one! My use is more fashion, street and architecture. Do you think this would be beneficial? I love the smaller profile and «stealthy» looks
Don’t downvote just because you don’t like the camera. The video does its job, the camera just isn’t interesting but I love bigheadtacos videos.
downvoted because of the tedious over gesturing with the hands.
Thanks for the video. I had a D-LUX 4 titanium and used it for many years as my 'go to, with me all the time' camera... till I dropped it a short distance on a table and after that the lens wouldn't stay out after turning it on :-( Too much ¥ to repair and it was time for an up-date anyway. Replaced it with a GR and love that camrea to bits. I also have a Leica monochrom for more serious/creative/fun photography, but its not something I have with me all the time. With the GR showing its age - dust on the sensor, sticky shutter release, buttons - have been thinking about something new for that everyday-color. Have been waiting and had thought it would be the GR III to be coming soon, but this D-LUX 7 could be an alternitive. 24-75 is the perfect focal range, sensor is enough (although I'd been saying to myself nothing less than APS-C), manual controls, bluetooth and finder/nice rear touch screen, and [I hope] built well.
BTW; for those that say its not worth the extra money over the Panasonic... For a couple hundred dollars...
I'm from the USA but in Japan and the Panasonics here are only Japanese language menu. Leica has a 3 year guarantee (compared to 1 year for Panasonic). The Kyoto Leica Shop is a short train ride from me and any problems I have Leica Japan has taken very good care of me over the years. The red dot does have a 'premium' label to it and if I do ever decide to sell it (without droping it ;-) the resale value is higher (or atleast sellable). And... I like the styling of the Leica version, hay if I'm going to be carrying this around with me a lot, may as well enjoy it.
Thanks for sharing your experience. I also find the accessories are much nicer for the Leica. The currently available cases for the Typ 109 and 7 are amazing. And yes, depending on your country, typically the warranty is better for the Leica, especially if you travel or move. The warranty is international.
Yeah I'm thinking the same. The LX100 II is only a minor update to the LX100, but it's a minor update to what looks like a great, particularly well-rounded compact camera. And this Leica variant is just so timeless and nice looking. I shoot with a Fujifilm X-T1 and have said to myself that APS-C is the perfect compromise between quality and weight/size/cost... But this one looks very tempting. :) The micro 4/3 sensor ought to still distance itself comfortably ahead of even the latest generation of smartphone cameras although they keep getting better. I think 1" sensor cameras are about to get endangered especially with advancements of the photo post-processing engines and processing power in the smartphones.
Same can had panosonic with leica badge ? Any different. firmware ?
The patina on the iPhone leather case is absolutely stunning.
16:04 I don't get it, the lens looks different to other videos! the lens don't opens like that.
Can you list some older compatible flash units?
I wonder if i can turn the screen in BW mode?
D Lux 7 or Leica CL as first camera if you already has basic or good at photography and you can only has only camera?
Hi, I need some advice for a "definitive" family camera that brings out images with a certain three-dimensionality focused more on portraits of my fast-moving children. I currently have a Nikon z50 16-50 and 50-250 (sorry only for the small limited af area in Af-c and the lack of a 70-300 for football matches) and sometimes it annoys me to take my bag with me in contexts to go out with my family and to the sea. I need a compact camera that can be attached to a belt loop or that fits in a pocket. Probably the best solution would be to have a pocket compact and possibly a reflex or mirrorless camera that is not too small.
I am undecided between the gr III x or fujifilm x100v or leica d-lux 7, pen-f, gx9, Canon RP + 50mm for the "definitive" portraits For shots of my family.
I am looking for the most creative and fun camera that will entice me to take it with me regardless of whether it has beautiful filters and B&W.
What would you recommend me? Thanks.
Hello, i have the new iphone pro max and i just ordered the d lux 7 as my first real camera. is it worth having in 2021? does it take way better pictures than the latest iphone?
Depends on what, but the new smartphones are very good right now. I think in lowlight and video, the iPhone ProMax will outshoot the DLux in many ways.... due to software enhancements. My feeling is you’ll need to go up to either the Panasonic GH series or Sony A7 series to see a noticeable difference, especially in lowlight situations. Plus, these won’t be straight out of camera footage. You’ll still need to work with these files in a proper video editing software.
in body stabilisation? :-)
I think this is a very thorough unboxing slash review, why the hate?
Anyway, @bigheadtaco, currently I own PEN-F, which I think too bulky and heavy for travel/trip. Is it worth it to consider this one instead as replacement?
The D-Lux 7 or Panasonic LX series equivalent are still great cameras. I have a buddy in Japan who shoots with it and loves it.
I have this,along with a Sony r7iii,,,,this camera is amazing,,,
what a great unboxing video. leica really creates some of the most beautiful cameras!
really enjoyed this, hope to see more.
and thanks for sharing all this super dope content with us
Thanks.
Wondering if a tilting screen and a dual command dial for ISO+SS like the X100V could be a thing for Leica D-Lux 7 & Panasonic Lumix LX100 II?
To my knowledge the lx100 mii has a stationary screen. Did you buy it?
Considering one of these, I used to have aFuji X series a few years ago, and loved using it. however since then just been using my iPhone ‘pro’ ☺️.
For the price I guess I’ll need to consider if I’ll use it enough to warrant buying one, but there is something ‘special’ about using a dedicated camera albeit at this user level.
The only difference between this and lx100ii is no grip? I don't get why it costs so much more
It's a beautiful camera for sure. For some it would be an idea travel camera. The quality is good enough for professional use, too. The lens might be fixed, but that leaf shutter sure is nice to have - even if you don't shoot with a flash, it's very quiet.
You're right about the zoom - it should be stepped. Or, that should be an option in the menu. I still think that compacts cannot be replaced by phones, FWIW. Yes, the 2018 iPhones are amazing but even they, with all their computational advances, aren't as good as a modern camera like the D-Lux. Not even close.
If you are giving Leica feedback, please tell them that they should be the first manufacturer to completely eliminate sliding apertures from their zoom lenses. It's bad enough for photography, but it's even worse for video.
P.S. Nice flatlay!
The zoom is stepped, it's in the menu as an option when you set it up by configuring the lens' manual focus ring to be zoom instead. Fundamental that these reviewers actually read the manual and learn the camera before making videos like this but.. whatever. And yeah, one of the best small cameras ever made and Leica's last compact camera. A classic in the making.
Curious about the difference between dlux7 and Panasonic lx100 mii quite a bit cheaper
basically the same. You're paying for the Leica branding and slight difference in external shell. I prefer the look of the Leica, but it comes down to how much the styling and branding is worth to you.
The Typ 109 is the best overall camera I own and I own a Sony A7 and a Fuji X100F. Street, travel, portrait, nature, landscape. There’s nothing the D-Lux cams can’t handle. Might have to own a D-Lux 7 or Lx100 mk 2
Nice but at almost the price of a Fuji x pro 2...and that's for a warmed over Panasonic.. No thanks 😎😎😎
Bought one. All pictures come out severely over exposed (exposure compensation set at 0) with a blue tint. AWB, Auto-ISO, Auto-shutter and Aperature priority both in RAW and JPEG and JPEG fine. Even tried in full auto (little red button) and same bad result. Colours are way off and very cold and unnatural. Compared it by taking the same picture of the same scene, same camera setting with a D80 and and even with my Iphone and both came out way better. I am in no way an expert however GF is a pro and normally shoots with her Nikon. Se can't figure it out either. Something is off. Any thoughts?
Very odd, have you factor reset everything and try again? Also, have you made sure that even though you're in auto white balance, there is a feature that allows you to tweak the balance. Make sure that's zero. Also, did you make sure that it's not on any 'smart' exposure mode, just the standard Program Auto? Also, did you check the actual LCD and EVF setting, that it's not been adjusted? Make sure those are set to normal. Finally, did you actually upload the images to the computer to see if it looks the same?
If you do this and it's still looking odd, you will have to contact Leica. Perhaps you have a faulty copy. Mine actually had really nice and neutral colours and exposure was really good.
I did do the factory reset to make sure I did not accidentally mess a setting up and all mentioned settings are on standard. They look horrible in Lightroom as well. Will contact Leica and see what they advise. Thank you for your reply. @@bigheadtaco
Helixx too bad. Leica has a good warranty so I’m sure it will be resolved.... good luck....
You obviously got a defective camera. I hope you returned and got it exchanged because that's the thing to do.
D lux 7 or Fujifilm x100v which one is best for street photography in terms of image quality... Plz suggest
for straight out IQ the X100V for sure. It has more resolution, plus the 23mm f/2 lens which has a 35mm equiv field of view is very sharp.
Between CL And D Lux 7, I love both, one is spinning wheel control, one is analog control, I like the analog control on D Lux but it’s not a real Leica and CL is, so I not sure if I should but D Lux 7 first because it’s like you buy a fake Leica but D Lux do will give me more things I can do, no lenses need to buy too and everything just good but probably pics not as good as CL, I don’t know, please help!
The CL will have superior resolution, build quality and flexibility, but of course you have to pay for this. If you have a few thousand dollars to invest, the CL is a good investment if you want to get into the Leica ecosystem at a reasonable price (for Leica). If not, the D-Lux will be your cheapest entry point into Leica digital.
The len can’t zoom?
I really enjoyed your presentation; both informative and entertaining. I'm subscribing.
Bigheadtaco, great video. Though I think you do a disservice to your great work by headlining it as just an unboxing. This is really more a review, and a very good one. You go deep into these type of great point and shoot cameras. Very good job. Please give us more. As for the D Lux 7, I will see if it can be my next camera. I have the small but brilliant Leica C typ 112. Amazing point and shoot that gives you spectacular images with that warm, classy Leica look. Will see if my next Leica is the D Lux or maybe some of the other Leicas. Take care.
Very good video after the unboxing! Are all the physical controls on the d-lux 7, the same as the type 109? In other words, if I buy the Kindle Photographers Guide to the D-lux type 109.....do you think it will it cover the the same features found on the d-lux 7?
Unkei
Very very good unboxing video ! Very very clear explained .👍👍👍💖
I have a question: how about the colors of the Leica? Are those the same like with the Panasonic? I don't like the settings... Leica Q is so minimalistic!
This camera is designed and built by Panasonic, so you'll get Panasonic colours.
Thanks
Pretty compact the V-Lux 5 / LX100 II. Wondering if Leica/Panasonic-Lumix will update the advanced compact.
A tilting screen like the one on the recent Fuji X100V could be interesting for this camera. Good, compact and discrete for street photography.
No more updates. This is the last one of its breed. Get one while you can, both the Leica or the Panasonic will do.
Hi, is it possible to put lens hood on this camera?
Yes. Round or even square one a'la Leica M Lenses style. I got a square one and looks killer. Just make sure is a hood for 43mm filter thread.
iLove D’Lux7 is fabulous and beautiful 📸
Shouldn't the Fuji X70 be in there? That seems like a serious competitor, along with the LX100 (II) obviously
True, but it's discontinued and hard to find. It's become sort of a cult camera now.... I really hope for an X80..... like soon!!
Can find heaps of them second hand.. but doesn't have a zoom.. is a very different kind of camera.
so lx100 ii or leica D-Lux 7,may be leica has more 3d pop to the picture ? or same ? plz reply
There's no optical or sensor difference between the Leica and Panasonic. Both are made by Panasonic in the same factory, most likely the same assembly line.
@@bigheadtaco thanks man..i still go for leica D-lux 7
leica d-lux 7 or fujifilm xt3?
very different cameras. If you want an all-in-one camera, the D-Lux 7 is great. However, you'll get better IQ and video on the X-T3.
I understand the point of the D-lux. No complaints from me about it's existance. However - why not stick a Leica-like shell on the menu system? Surely that couldn't cost too much for a little more leica feel.
When you first turn it on it does flash for a second.... but other than that, ya it's pretty much a Panasonic.
Will you make a hands on video? Where you use it on street and in other situations?
his hands were already doing enough on this video.
@@stijnvandamme76 hands hater...
50mm equivalent is very tight for the wide end of a consumer camera
It is 24mm equivalent on the wide end. 24-75mm.
hands down such a great review, i just lost interest in the camera thank you!
Still prefer the RX-1 series
Best compact digital camera ever made, period. But, no zoom.
LEICA DLUX7 or FUJI X100V？
Hi! would you recommend me this one instead of the new fujifilm x100v?
I don't think so, honestly. This is a Panasonic LX100 II with a rebranded case in reality, for $400 more. If you want a really small pocket size powerful camera, you should get the Ricoh GRIII. But if you don't mind a camera a little bulkier, the X100V is great on all aspects, just be aware it is not pocket size, maybe on a jacket or something but not on your pants, unlike the Ricoh.
Nice, man - I'm curious about this or the type 109. What's that strap?
109 doesn't use the full 4/3rs sensor and as result is lower megapixels
Always liked these more compact cameras. Have a Fuji X10 - along with some Nikon stuff - that most of my favourite pictures have been made with. Was supposed to upgrade to a X40, but that never happened. My X10 are now starting to suffer from its age, and I can't find a new camera that fulfils my spec wishes …
Yes I know what you mean. I was hoping Fujifilm would try to compete against the Sony RX and Canon GxX series, but they decided to focus on the lower end ILC market instead.... I really did like the X30. The manual zoom was a great feature.
I don’t understand the d lux cameras, they’re just literally Panasonic cameras with no additional benefits for more money. It doesn’t even look premium or well built, it looks cheaply made, not a real Leica.
Leica has partnered with Panasonic to make them a profitable company. The 'real' Leica cameras don't make them enough money, and they don't have the money to make their own point and shoots, so they get other manufacturers to make them. Leica has been doing this since the 1970s. The Leica CL was made by Minolta, the Leica R series was co-developed with Minolta as well. All of Leica's film point and shoots were made by other manufactures (most Minilux's were made by Minolta). In the new digital age Leica has partnered with Panasonic. Without this partnership, my guess is Leica would not be profitable. Remember Leica has a total of 1600 global employees. They are a small time company trying to swim in a market with global giants like Sony, Canon, Panasonic, etc. Without these licensing deals (Panasonic's M43 lenses are labeled Leica but they really aren't) I think Leica will have the same fate as most other European camera manufacturers: bankrupt or bought out.
bigheadtaco I’m aware of that but at least the CL cameras could take Leica M glass and were well made in their own right. I’m asking why people would buy the non Leica cameras with the Leica dot, especially in the digital age.
I’m not questioning why Leica does it, it’s a smart business move, I’m questioning why someone would buy one of these cameras especially over the cheaper Panasonic versions which are functionally identically.
@@owRekssjfjxjxuurrpqpqss for better or worse, people are brand loyal. They believe in what Leica stands for and are willing to support them. If it means paying a bit more for the same thing, it's okay. They don't want Leica to go out of business, but also they get something out of being a Leica consumer. There's a sense of premium when you buy a Leica. But this is for another subject, the idea of brand loyalty and value. But thanks for your thoughts. These discussions are important.
it's for posers. What Leica "stands for" is licensing out their name to make money because their business model doesn't work. Imagine if Ferrari started putting it's logo on a Fiat...oh wait, they did, back in the 1960s.The "Ferrari" Fiat Dino Coupe, and it's still sneered at by Ferrari fans.
Check out the better Warranty and free Lightroom cost, it just suddenly makes lots of sense ;)
The extending zoom lens kills it for me
Can she unleash lightning?
..with the flash, yes!
This or Fuji X100f
Did you decide not to make a hands-on video after all?
I will make a comment on it soon. I was able to get some decent pictures with it, but for the price I really can’t recommend. I think the Panasonic LX100 mark II is a better value, but I was happy with the image quality.
I wish you would more of the kind of videos you used to do years ago, instead of these sort of inconsequential videos. I have always liked your work, but miss the old bigheadtaco who talked more of photography as art.
I'm still here. Did you see my street shootout in Hong Kong with Camera Film Photo or my tour of The Annex Photo in Toronto? Just remember those video takes weeks or months to produce. An unboxing video takes 1 day, and gets 10 times more views. I balance the need for views with the more difficult videos that get much less views, but I enjoy more. If all I did was interviews and travel videos, I'd produce about 10 videos a year. I also did some Two Minute Tuesday videos. Again, very low view count in comparison to my gear videos. I will continue doing them, but view counts and view minutes are important to me. I also only work with brands I like and review gear that I enjoy using. I've always reviewed gear and I've always done unboxing videos. If you consume all my content (website, Instagram, Twitter, FujiLove, Medium Format Magazine) you will see that RUclips is 10-15% of my entire ecosystem.
Finally, without high view videos, I get less opportunity to do the more fun videos I enjoy doing. Total amount of subscribers and views open up doors for me and my brand. I've never required anyone for money to view my own content, I don't do Patreon, so this is an important part of my brand. Without it, there will be no videos.
bigheadtaco will most likely unfollow soon. Typical unboxing like every other youtuber.
@@cnswanson7207 I don't know how long you've been following me, but thanks for your support. I also don't know if you only comment when you don't like something, or if you regularly comment on most of my videos. I'd like to know what videos of mine you enjoy and why specifically this video is what is making you think twice of leaving. Is it the camera that I'm reviewing? Am I doing too many unboxings? I am curious to know. Thanks if you have time to reply 👊🏼
Leica markets this as "the notepad"-camera to its professional clients. The truth is that this camera is made for (us) peasants who want a Leica, but can not afford one...
It’s over a grand just because of the red dot 😬
Basically, but the LX100 II is just shy below $1000, so it isn't cheap. Great deals on the original LX100 and X-Lux Typ 109 though. Same lens, different sensor.
string thingy, love that, LOL
🤷🏻♂️
Worth $1200? or I get a better camera for that money?
..or you can buy around 300 Big Mac meals for the same amount of money too.. just depends what you wanna do with it :)
I don't know how to feel about this camera.
I do like the idea of a new D-Lux,I only wish Leica had gone for something other than a rebadged micro Four Thirds camera.
Come on Leica innovate.
Strong partnership between Panny and Leica. Leica has been rebadging Panny compacts for probably 10 years. I'm glad to see it continue and now evolve with L-Mount.
Good Review.
Great video
Thanks for watching!
Maybe you need to do a video on just the lens cap.....
i have the typ109 and pretty much got out of carrying dslr when traveling my 109 is my go to travel so much versatility and control
The Typ 109 is great. This is 20% better and after so many years, I think maybe the price point is a bit steep. Keep that 109 going, it's a digital classic!!
Nice review !
whose this guy? a camera burglar? 😜
for Leica owners who want only a Leica branded 'cheap' compact to throw in their bag with whichever Leica M's they have
What about the Leica C-Lux midnight blue?
Ohhhh man..
no USB-C? or is the USB-C going to be available else where?
the future is USB-C and some other brands have already started making the switch. For instance Fujifilm's X-T3 is now USB-C.
Came here cuz of joy
D-LUX 7 = TYPE 3952, as indicated on the bottom label. Now Leica uses TYPE instead of TYP. This new convention began with the C-LUX introduced a few months earlier.
Cool thanks for the info! Type 3952. Sounds kind of boring doesn't it?
Making and watching unboxing videos is a form of mental illness... Get your materialism on!!!
I made you watch, so I guess you're also ill..... :-)
MIC puts me off.
Look at my Panasonic, it says Leica 💩
top view looks like a x100f
For sure, and that's why I like the control features of this camera. Very intuitive for those who shoot film or X series cameras.
Scruffkingman if the x100f was cheap plastic.
It's kind of ugly tbh. I wish Panasonic would remake/upgrade the GM5.
GM5 was pretty cool. I agree. Kind of a cult camera. Most hated it, but that thing was tiny!!
I'd second that, and also add a updated GM1(kind of partial as I own one). Maybe add the updated 20mp sensor and if possible have the mechanical shutter when using flash be 1/100. I'm okay with 1/500s sans flash, but 1/50s a second with flash is just a bit too slow.
You kidding me? The retro design is to die for.
The hell are you talking about? Looks great to me
you are blind
Gosh! How many times I did seek the video forward!! For god sake keep it simple
Tedious
Sorry - It sent me to sleep!
Bro stop moving so fast
It's the milk tea, I can't help it
German but made in china :))
Talking full of language 's.everybody ' s hate
Painful. I made it till the lens cap leash
Well, I warned you in the description. 🤷🏻♂️
@@bigheadtaco Dude, are you selling stuff? Man, you are trying to hard. Your hands are pretty though.
Man, you talk so much. I have never seen somebody to talk as much as you about a strap. Otherwise very knowledgeable and full of information but keep it shorter. You could actually submit this video to a film festival as a short film.
introduction skill is poor need big big improvement. this is so hard to understand what your are taliking about
Sorry. Over rated, over priced and no thanks.
Same can be said about Sony and Panasonic
Gopro 9 .gopro 8 . Better than this
Very boring presentation. Unnecessarily long. Forcing. I don't like this and marketing ideas. Pretty repulsive.