MSFS 2020 | REVIEW: LatinVFR Madrid Barajas & City scenery for Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 5 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 43

  • @denault3985
    @denault3985 3 года назад +4

    Totally agree with Filbert, excellent depiction of Terminal's 4 & 4S but the older buildings/cargo area textures are not up to today's standards (dodgy as described by Filbert).
    Again, thanks to Filbert for these excellent reviews!

  • @captshark2153
    @captshark2153 3 года назад +6

    I feel this review was fair and accurate. I was contemplating purchasing this but after the comparison I am on the fence, so to speak. While beautiful and detailed, the high cost does not do much to offset the enjoyment. If it was offered at a more reasonable price it would be in my Community folder. The default scenery comparison pretty much made my decision. Asobo's handcrafted version is actually quite good. That being said, if there were to be a sale I may reconsider. Thanks for the review!

  • @TyphoonTranche5
    @TyphoonTranche5 3 года назад +6

    I think Microsoft flight Simulator is a very good game and probably the most detailed flight Simulator

  • @ricardomorillo8763
    @ricardomorillo8763 3 года назад +1

    Thanks so much Filbert for your time reviewing LEMD we will certainly look at the points you mention for future updates!

    • @richavery66
      @richavery66 3 года назад +1

      I was on the fence about buying this airport - it looks much better than Asobo's hand-crafted scenery but I agreed with Filbert's observations. However, this comment has persuaded me to buy this scenery - it's always great to see when developers take constructive criticism on board.

    • @FilbertFlies
      @FilbertFlies  3 года назад +1

      Hi Ricardo. No problem at all. Thanks for commenting, and I look forward to the next one. :-)

  • @sukhoi3572
    @sukhoi3572 3 года назад +6

    What a beautiful scenery! Looks like quite a big upgrade over Asobo's too.

  • @MrMOTOGPER
    @MrMOTOGPER 3 года назад +3

    Thanks for sharing!. Having Premium deluxe edition and being Barajas my home airport your review help me a lot to decide upon purchase latin VFR version. Overall, I do not see any big improvement over the default one, but maybe, the ground markings worth itself. Those are small, unreadable, and inacurate in the Asobo versión and you really miss them when taxing on this complex lay out airport. Runway textures destroy the general appareance during landing although touchdown marks have a realistic looking. I think I'll wait for an update to see those details finally fixed.

    • @DonAlvaro14
      @DonAlvaro14 3 года назад

      Its worth it only because of the city landmarks and some nice airport buildings like the Iberia repair center.

  • @dtrjones
    @dtrjones 3 года назад +2

    Hard one to judge this. I do like some of the apron ground textures even if they are not accurate and I think the feel of the place looks good. Some good modelling in the main terminal but it falls short of some of the higher quality addon's especially further afield. I think it's still quite a bit better than Asobo really rather good deluxe version but probably not worth it unless you fly there often. Overall FF I think you summed this review up beautifully!

    • @FilbertFlies
      @FilbertFlies  3 года назад +1

      Yeah, I kept changing my mind about it as I went along! As you say, hard to judge. Good in places, disappointing in other places.

  • @anthonymark3771
    @anthonymark3771 3 года назад +1

    Great video again. Like the comparison and hope you can find time to and it to some videos in the future. Whilst not as accurate as Latin’s, being a tube line flyer l do think l prefer Asobos as when parked at the gates you can see into the terminals. When sitting there for 25 minutes doing your preflight (a good part of the sim time), it adds more immersion. Latin’s interiors look really good esp in one of the terminals good, but by being a more accurate depiction from the outside which is where most of us will be, you don’t get to appreciate the interiors (except for the baggage areas). Sometimes being too accurate isn’t always the best in a sim. But again a great review. Thank you.

  • @ani5z
    @ani5z 3 года назад +1

    Looks really cool! Gonna install it rn!
    Thx for the review!

    • @probot8149
      @probot8149 3 года назад

      if you bought it did you have any problems with the ILS system of the airport

  • @davidneraas750
    @davidneraas750 3 года назад +1

    Latin vfrs last airport scenery you rewiewed was Barcelona and it was pretty good as far as i can remember its sad to see that they missed the mark on this one in crucial areas.

  • @CharlyBaby77
    @CharlyBaby77 3 года назад +1

    15:25 Filomena Storm 😅 Great graphics even with snow.

  • @stephenjones8928
    @stephenjones8928 3 года назад +1

    Best ground markings I've seen.

  • @JenniferinIllinois
    @JenniferinIllinois 3 года назад +1

    Filbert, you're upping your review game. 😉

    • @FilbertFlies
      @FilbertFlies  3 года назад +1

      Well, one tries one's best! Actually, this one took too long. The comparison AND the city landmarks were a bit much. Looking forward to Linate being quicker to be honest. 😉

    • @JenniferinIllinois
      @JenniferinIllinois 3 года назад

      @@FilbertFlies Well that and you landed at the wrong airport and had to fly to the correct one. Hehehe...

  • @fssim6825
    @fssim6825 3 года назад +3

    Nice review, although this airport has extra features like interior, I don't see the point of getting this unless you want the landmarks as this is already Hand crafted within Fs.

    • @Xanys
      @Xanys 3 года назад +1

      Another point to get this airport in my whole opinion if you are a frequent flyier, then you will appreaciate the level of detail or if you play a lot vatsim, then for taxi it makes it more easy and mainly for parking.

  • @mauritsbol4806
    @mauritsbol4806 3 года назад +1

    1:57.. ouch! Yeah that landing on my plane this afternoon was a bit on the rough aide so my back hurts a bit

    • @FilbertFlies
      @FilbertFlies  3 года назад +2

      I considered re-filming it, but I thought 'no, this will make someone feel better about their own landings' ;-)

    • @Denzao-D
      @Denzao-D 3 года назад

      Normal landing sometimes. Been on worse landings. The back would not hurt. Haha. So crazy people are

  • @reece650
    @reece650 3 года назад +1

    Hi great video again with an honest opinion which I like. One question on the product it says you need Contrail 1.0.5 any reason why and if you done download it?? Thank You

    • @FilbertFlies
      @FilbertFlies  3 года назад

      Contrail is how all LatinVFR sceneries are installed these days, along with Flightbeam's, some of Aerosoft's, JetStream Designs' and.. possibly others I've forgotten. It's just an easy way of installing and updating the products. I've never had issues with it. It's not quite as slick as Orbx Central, but it beats downloading individual installers. Alternative would be to buy through the Marketplace, if it's available there.

    • @reece650
      @reece650 3 года назад

      @@FilbertFliesThanks For you help in explaining it, this sounds so silly but how do you buy through the marketplace can you buy vouchers instead of inputting details in?? Also do they use alot of space up as the game itself is huge. Thanks Again

    • @FilbertFlies
      @FilbertFlies  3 года назад

      @@reece650 I don't think you can buy vouchers. I have the Microsoft Store version and it just uses my Microsoft account details to pay for the add-ons, same as when I bought the game. I think if you have the steam version, you can buy through steam I instead (and therefore should be able to buy vouchers) but I'm not certain cos I've never used it.

    • @reece650
      @reece650 3 года назад

      @@FilbertFlies Hi again thanks for that, I have the disc version so wanted to use like Microsoft gift cards if they did such a thing rather than account details. Ok thanks for your reply and help anyway really appreciate it.

  • @carl7899
    @carl7899 Год назад

    Does anybody know how to remove the KIO Towers and the 4 Towers from this scenery? The default ones that are in the simulator are much better detailed. Thank you.

  • @davidneraas750
    @davidneraas750 3 года назад

    Are you going to rewiew jetstream designs version lineate milano.? Im curious to see how it measures up against the rewiewed earlier by demos that was terrible. Something tells me that it will be good because jetstreams other airports nantes and orly were both great. Thanks for the great rewiews it makes it so much easier to seperate the great from the not so great airport sceneries.

  • @mauritsbol4806
    @mauritsbol4806 3 года назад +1

    Compared to other sceneries out there, not of madrid for example drezwiecki’s narita, i’m not really impressed. If you compare it to Asobo’s madrid it is a clear upgrade from even the deluxe/premium edition. That said, other scenery developers have done a much better job of different airports.

  • @MikeMartinezR
    @MikeMartinezR Год назад

    land looks a lot more like Madrid, Asobo's looks like a golf course, Adolfo Suarez is not 'greenish'

  • @FloridaVibesOfficial
    @FloridaVibesOfficial 3 года назад

    Do you the development A320NX?

  • @migueldegonzalo1
    @migueldegonzalo1 3 года назад

    Those a380 are exactly in the same place where you say they shouldn't be , they are there due to covid 19 retirement BA I'm cabin crew from Iberia so trust me lol

    • @FilbertFlies
      @FilbertFlies  3 года назад

      You misheard me - I didn't say they shouldn't be there, I said it was good that they were there 🙂

  • @ludviglazrev8160
    @ludviglazrev8160 3 года назад

    the a380 are because of corona right?

    • @FilbertFlies
      @FilbertFlies  3 года назад

      Yes, I assume so.

    • @Xanys
      @Xanys 3 года назад

      Correct, 8 A380 got send to Madrid Barajas for parking until the passanger number increase.

  • @cholosimeone8112
    @cholosimeone8112 3 года назад

    does VDGS work?