According to the Aviation Safety Network regarding the Atlas 747 N404KZ incident , two tires of the left body landing gear bursted during take off. The aircraft faced both hydraulic and pressurization problems after takeoff. Further damage was done on the metal wheels upon landing, so the runway was closed again for inspection until 8 a.m. So, the pilots did a really good job there.
@@TruthProvider "The Boeing reported hydraulic and pressurization problems after takeoff". Google "Aviation Safety Network Atlas 747 N404KZ" to read it yourself.
@@jake_ Yikes! That's not good! I was concerned that chunks of broken off tire would impact the fuselage and possibly make holes or dents / depressurize the plane.
That 757 landing is one of the reasons package tour companies LOVED them for nigh on 40 years. It can get in and out of very short fields with ease. Then once back at base in the UK, fuel up and head over to Orlando. No restrictions. Just a shame it's getting old. That is a model that deserved an update.
@benclark1753 nothing really matches it 1 to 1. The new A321XLR is the closest. But it doesn't match the 757 in raw performance. It's wing doesn't have the same loading ability, meaning it can't match the 757s ability to get out of the small runways with a full load of passengers and their baggage.
@@bmused55that’s incorrect. The XLR can do that just as well. But the thing is, people compare the two planes at max take off weight. But the XLR can fly 1000 miles further at max fuel. So if you fuel the XLR to the same range as the 757, it will do much better than the 757. You have to compare apples to apples.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 I did. I compared it to the use I mentioned: Packed full of package holiday passengers and their heavy baggage, flying in and out of short greek runways. The A321XLR CAN NOT do that. It will NOT be able to take a full load with baggage and get off the same short runway as the 757. Its wing just won't allow it. The 757 has bags of lift and power. The A321XLR does not. On max range, the XLR does beat the 757. But I would hope it does, its 40 years younger!
@@bmused55 passengers and bags really isn’t the issue. It’s the fuel that you carry. I doubt that you looked at the correct numbers, since at sea level, the 757 and the XLR at max take off weight, the XLR beats the 757. Now, here is another fact. Out of these Greek islands, why use the XLR? A regular 321NEO can do the job and basically fly the same distance as the 757. You are not comparing apples to apples.
Crosswinds are the Achilles' heel for many pilots. As a lifelong instructor and examiner, I am convinced it goes back to early training and a lack of tailwheel experience and handling techniques.
@@johnrobertson7583 The upwind wheels should always touch first or at worst, at the same time as the downwind gear. You have PLENTY of rudder at all times. It's large enough and powerful enough to maintain directional control following an engine failure at relatively low airspeeds and max power on the other engine. It can easily handle crosswinds.
It is, I really like it. I just googled it and see their new livery is the same design but in a whole variety of colours. I guess it helps protect them from flying zebras, who'll think the plane is one of their own kind and accept it into their herd. But on the other hand, that surely increases the risk of zebra-related mid-air incidents? 🤔 Anyway, it looks very cool and I'm sure the folk at Condor Airways know more than I do about aircraft camouflage.
@@TruthProvider *Fun zebra-related fact* - it's widely quoted that "no two zebras have the same patterning". Well, in 2022 scientists discovered a pair of identical zebras in the Kenyan savannah. It would have been entirely impossible to tell them apart, save for the fact one was called Steve and the other was called Jonathan.
Pilots often underestimate LHR ! Nice & flat, dual single use parallel runways, no terrain to speak of but the wind there can catch out many an experienced pilot & then there is the shed effect !
I speak as someone without knowledge of the aircraft or being a pilot; but on the first one, it did not seem to me like a left aileron came up to put downward pressure on the left wing; I'm wondering why not, or did I miss something? Thanks for any insight.
What's the compensation maneuver a pilot might use to get the plane's raised tire side to come back down to earth ? Many options to compensate ? Also, w/ that strong cross wind, wouldn't have it been better to land the plane on a runway direction that went with said crosswind ?
@@sidv4615 I did post a short saying I would go to Bahrain, when i departed Heathrow and landed Bahrain, I was in window so I made a vid about it but since coming back I was in middle row so I couldnt
Aerosucre: We paid for the whole runway, we're gonna use the whole runway. That DHL pilot: We paid for the full brake power, we're gonna use the full brake power!
For an aircraft to suffer an engine pod strike, the engine pod has to actually touch/hit something. Also, its an engine nacelle. Not a pod. A pod is a closed structure. The engines have a massive hole up front and behind.
I'm not going to go back and look but didn't it say "almost suffer(s) an engine pod strike"? That's what I saw at least but maybe my mind just inserted that "almost" subconsciously
Oh man, I fly using KLM cityhopper on those E175s through Amsterdam regularly! That definitely hit close to home. It wasn't all that long ago they lost some ground staff to an engine accident in Schiphol, no?
Did the KLM ingest any birds on landing? I don't hear any noticeable difference in the engine sound, and it's great to see the pilots continued the approach instead of panicking and TOGA-ing tf out of the scary flock as some have done before. They were only seconds from touchdown, but it certainly would have still been possible to go around from that altitude… as long as the engines aren't all damaged by the encounter and making the damage significantly worse by being in TOGA mode.
Why wouldn't the 747 continue to its destination instead of conducting an overweight landing with blown tires? I'm pretty sure whatever detination it had could most likely handle the emergency+maintenance. I'm honestly asking, not trying to be a smartass.
Well first of all we don't know what type of damage was caused. Also, maybe they weren't familiar with their destination airport which increases the workload (especially when it's a night landing) or maybe their destination didn't have the required facilities, who knows. There's simply not enough information in this short clip to answer this without a lot of assumptions.
That just goes to show you, you cannot let that cross wind correction out until you are secured on the ground (all the wheels are on the ground and the aircraft is decelerating).
Despite blowing 2 tires The Queen of The Skies still took off and returned safely. I'll always love the 747❤✈ As for DHL pilot. Maybe he/she needed an urgent bathroom break, and the onboard facilities were out of order?🚽🚾
"DHL 1-2-3 four-mile final request full length." "DHL 1-2-3 cleared to land full length approved, and just a reminder we charge per meter of runway used." "DHL 1-2-3 roger, cleared to land and we'll now be exiting on the first taxiway."
Thanks for including my video of the Condor go-around. Let me know if you would like to use any other videos. I have a Ryanair 737 go around (onboard the actual plane) and a cargolux 747 departing (I was stood next to the runway in the middle). Thanks!
That 787 cross wind landing was tragic. The 747 decision to return was rather odd because Boeing suggest continuing is the better option, and that 757 was, literally, being flown by a lunatic.
Not an expert, just a private pilot here but i would've done the same, why risk it? Also a comment above mentions there were hydraulic problems, so that alongside the bursted tires on the main gear would be enough to make that call i guess?
@@RonaldPottol - I’ve not seen anywhere that the 747 suffered anything more than blown tyres. People have speculated that blown tyres could create further damage but that’s just hypothetical. If all they have are blown tyres then the Boeing procedure is to continue, all things considered.
@@estebandiaz8688 .its a commercial operation . If “ why risk it “ was the only criteria you’d cost the company millions of pounds . As has been stated boeing advice is to continue , unless there are other factors involved which hasn’t been stated
Wrong subject. Drama queen. The pilot didn't fail the crosswind landing, just a bit mismanaged, but he landed without damaging anything, other than ego, so no failed landing.
Your captions leave a lot to be desired. That Gulf Air B789 never “suffered an engine pod strike”. It just didn’t happen. Why hyperbolize? Why fake it? It’s interesting enough on its own!! You fibbing about it makes you less credible, not the video more engaging!! Keep it up, I’ll unsubscribe.
@@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549the wing not wings…they are dihedral…so you have to dip level the one wing into the wind. That stops the wind pushing you off the centreline and into a bank. So you dip into the wind and rudder to centre line. Are you a pilot?
![Twenty One Pilots - The Line (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Audio]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XCz7WUotXs8/mqdefault.jpg)
According to the Aviation Safety Network regarding the Atlas 747 N404KZ incident , two tires of the left body landing gear bursted during take off. The aircraft faced both hydraulic and pressurization problems after takeoff. Further damage was done on the metal wheels upon landing, so the runway was closed again for inspection until 8 a.m. So, the pilots did a really good job there.
Pressurization of the brake system, or pressurization of the fuselage?
@@TruthProvider "The Boeing reported hydraulic and pressurization problems after takeoff".
Google "Aviation Safety Network Atlas 747 N404KZ" to read it yourself.
@@TruthProvider "crack(s) of the fuselage were found later"
@@jake_ Yikes! That's not good! I was concerned that chunks of broken off tire would impact the fuselage and possibly make holes or dents / depressurize the plane.
I'd like to hear the voice tapes of that take-off; there's gotta be some new vocabulary for me to learn!
The glow coming out of the Atlas 747 engines….Badass.
Wow, yes, you're right. I had never noticed that before.
2:49 the reverse thrust creating a blurry wall in front of the plane was super cool! 🔥🔥
Fr
And the two little tornadoes that go up into the engines.
@@Yonkage-ik5qb yeah those vortices were super cool!
and a lot of risk of FOD...
@@geonauto yeah! Hope the runways were free at that time.
That 757 landing is one of the reasons package tour companies LOVED them for nigh on 40 years. It can get in and out of very short fields with ease. Then once back at base in the UK, fuel up and head over to Orlando. No restrictions. Just a shame it's getting old. That is a model that deserved an update.
Yeah its a pity they were never updated. Do you know what aircraft type is the next best option, as far as engine performance, etc?
@benclark1753 nothing really matches it 1 to 1. The new A321XLR is the closest. But it doesn't match the 757 in raw performance. It's wing doesn't have the same loading ability, meaning it can't match the 757s ability to get out of the small runways with a full load of passengers and their baggage.
@@bmused55that’s incorrect. The XLR can do that just as well. But the thing is, people compare the two planes at max take off weight. But the XLR can fly 1000 miles further at max fuel. So if you fuel the XLR to the same range as the 757, it will do much better than the 757. You have to compare apples to apples.
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 I did. I compared it to the use I mentioned: Packed full of package holiday passengers and their heavy baggage, flying in and out of short greek runways.
The A321XLR CAN NOT do that. It will NOT be able to take a full load with baggage and get off the same short runway as the 757. Its wing just won't allow it. The 757 has bags of lift and power. The A321XLR does not.
On max range, the XLR does beat the 757. But I would hope it does, its 40 years younger!
@@bmused55 passengers and bags really isn’t the issue. It’s the fuel that you carry.
I doubt that you looked at the correct numbers, since at sea level, the 757 and the XLR at max take off weight, the XLR beats the 757.
Now, here is another fact. Out of these Greek islands, why use the XLR? A regular 321NEO can do the job and basically fly the same distance as the 757.
You are not comparing apples to apples.
Crosswinds are the Achilles' heel for many pilots. As a lifelong instructor and examiner, I am convinced it goes back to early training and a lack of tailwheel experience and handling techniques.
1:39 Forget the tires, that was pretty cool engine glow!
True! I wonder if it's common...
I have never seen that before and I've watched all kinds of various videos of 747 taking off, very cool.
It's like when the Concorde's afterburners sometimes glowed.
Nice save for the Gulf Air 787.
Nice save? That was horrific flying.
"fails crosswind landing" ok bro who hurt you lmao
yeah basically you dont put the upwind wheels down so you can still have yaw control at those speeds...
I call it a pass unless paint gets left on the runway.
@@johnrobertson7583 The upwind wheels should always touch first or at worst, at the same time as the downwind gear. You have PLENTY of rudder at all times. It's large enough and powerful enough to maintain directional control following an engine failure at relatively low airspeeds and max power on the other engine. It can easily handle crosswinds.
Tha is for sharing these amazing clips , nothing compares to 747 night take off awesome view thanks again ❤❤❤❤❤😊😊😊
❤The Gulf Air guy gets credit for a Dog Pee trick. Welll done
Always ailerons INTO wind!
Thanks for the extra 14 seconds
Can I just say, that Condor stripe paint job is just amazing.
I suppose if you like zebras...
It is, I really like it. I just googled it and see their new livery is the same design but in a whole variety of colours. I guess it helps protect them from flying zebras, who'll think the plane is one of their own kind and accept it into their herd. But on the other hand, that surely increases the risk of zebra-related mid-air incidents? 🤔 Anyway, it looks very cool and I'm sure the folk at Condor Airways know more than I do about aircraft camouflage.
@@TruthProvider *Fun zebra-related fact* - it's widely quoted that "no two zebras have the same patterning". Well, in 2022 scientists discovered a pair of identical zebras in the Kenyan savannah. It would have been entirely impossible to tell them apart, save for the fact one was called Steve and the other was called Jonathan.
During WW2, they called that, "Dazzle."
Great paint job, I think it could be improved by a giant pair of googly eyes & a forked tongue painted on. World's first giant, winged flying snake 😂
0:13 I was actually filming that too from outside the airport
Same
Gulfair did very well under the circumstances.
That 787 pilot was just showin off for that one female pilot he’s tryin to date with that one gear landing 😂
The DHL pilot is a boss
Yeah 👌👌👌
Love your videos
Pilots often underestimate LHR ! Nice & flat, dual single use parallel runways, no terrain to speak of but the wind there can catch out many an experienced pilot & then there is the shed effect !
DHL: -We're not gonna pay for the whole runway, we only used the first quarter
Thanks for the video
another amazing video
Amazing !
That gulf air almost tipped over
I was on that flight
I speak as someone without knowledge of the aircraft or being a pilot; but on the first one, it did not seem to me like a left aileron came up to put downward pressure on the left wing; I'm wondering why not, or did I miss something? Thanks for any insight.
Love your videos always share them with my dad .. we enjoy watching them ❤
well done gulf air
The DHL 757 with the left engine vorticities so cool !
What was that word? 😅
Wing low into the wind, apply opposite rudder to maintain runway alignment, apply more pressure as airspeed decreases. It takes practice .
A 1.32 belle observation de nuit 🙂👍
What's the compensation maneuver a pilot might use to get the plane's raised tire side to come back down to earth ? Many options to compensate ? Also, w/ that strong cross wind, wouldn't have it been better to land the plane on a runway direction that went with said crosswind ?
@@timmellin2815 .large airports have runways into the prevailing wind . Sometimes the gods say otherwise
First is awesome and badass
0:08 YOO I WAS ON THAT FLIGHT
Cap
Video or it didn’t happen
@@tigerlord600 I was in middle row anyways how would you know
@@sidv4615 I was in middle row and plus I just woke up, it was a flight from Bahrain to London on GF003
@@sidv4615 I did post a short saying I would go to Bahrain, when i departed Heathrow and landed Bahrain, I was in window so I made a vid about it but since coming back I was in middle row so I couldnt
Amazing😋
❤ Queen of the Air. Miss her
1:17 I was tracking that 747 and was wondering why it returned and sat on the runway for so long
Was that 74 gear on that Atlas?
Aerosucre: We paid for the whole runway, we're gonna use the whole runway.
That DHL pilot: We paid for the full brake power, we're gonna use the full brake power!
For an aircraft to suffer an engine pod strike, the engine pod has to actually touch/hit something.
Also, its an engine nacelle. Not a pod. A pod is a closed structure. The engines have a massive hole up front and behind.
Engine pod is fine to use. 🙄
Gee! Thanks, Professor! 🙄
I'm not going to go back and look but didn't it say "almost suffer(s) an engine pod strike"?
That's what I saw at least but maybe my mind just inserted that "almost" subconsciously
@@andrewsercer9538I had to do the same. It does say "almost".
757 simply the best
Oh man, I fly using KLM cityhopper on those E175s through Amsterdam regularly! That definitely hit close to home.
It wasn't all that long ago they lost some ground staff to an engine accident in Schiphol, no?
How does this hit close to home? Airplanes and birds fly worldwide, not just in Amsterdam.
A maintenance worker jumped in the nacelle, it was suicide
@@rtbrtb_dutchy4183 As I said, I regularly fly that airline, into that airport, on those planes.
Did the KLM ingest any birds on landing? I don't hear any noticeable difference in the engine sound, and it's great to see the pilots continued the approach instead of panicking and TOGA-ing tf out of the scary flock as some have done before. They were only seconds from touchdown, but it certainly would have still been possible to go around from that altitude… as long as the engines aren't all damaged by the encounter and making the damage significantly worse by being in TOGA mode.
Pilots don’t go around from that point because of birds. Not sure why you would think that.
You owe us -15 seconds of aviation
Why wouldn't the 747 continue to its destination instead of conducting an overweight landing with blown tires? I'm pretty sure whatever detination it had could most likely handle the emergency+maintenance. I'm honestly asking, not trying to be a smartass.
Potential fire on affected tires/bogey.
Wondered the same thing but maybe to do with where they have maintenance agreements
How are you pretty sure? And how could you know it would be safer? Seriously.
Well first of all we don't know what type of damage was caused. Also, maybe they weren't familiar with their destination airport which increases the workload (especially when it's a night landing) or maybe their destination didn't have the required facilities, who knows. There's simply not enough information in this short clip to answer this without a lot of assumptions.
I agree with Tomas, probably safer to continue… unless it was headed to China, then screw it. Back to departure airport…😅
787 landing
Me: ai Ai ai ai ai, ai ufaaaa 😂
How would they be able to take off with blown tires?
There’s more than one wheel on each gear
That just goes to show you, you cannot let that cross wind correction out until you are secured on the ground (all the wheels are on the ground and the aircraft is decelerating).
Despite blowing 2 tires The Queen of The Skies still took off and returned safely. I'll always love the 747❤✈ As for DHL pilot. Maybe he/she needed an urgent bathroom break, and the onboard facilities were out of order?🚽🚾
Probably a former naval aviator, just missing the tailhook.
@@LordFalconsword Could be! 🤭
Does anyone know if Atlas had retreads on the rear tires of the body gear? That contributes to the issue they experienced
Pretty sure they all do...
Lol at the Gulf Air CGI
"DHL 1-2-3 four-mile final request full length."
"DHL 1-2-3 cleared to land full length approved, and just a reminder we charge per meter of runway used."
"DHL 1-2-3 roger, cleared to land and we'll now be exiting on the first taxiway."
2:50 Is that a tire squeek? Wow.
Cool! 😁👍
No engine strike, had lolen3 feet
Kelsey returning to the FBO for a second haul of snacks
We got a bonus 15 seconds!
Almost something happened
747 is still the best n most beautiful aircraft ever built.
That wing flex tho… 0:21
So good
The DHL looks like a 767.🤔
1:19 Oh wow, they brought the landing gear up with burst tires. Maybe they didn't know about it at the time, but if they did... that's a big nono.
Birds: 🦆🦜🦆🦜🦢🐓🐥
KLM: ✈️
At 69. 3 minutes is all my attention span can handle...
2 rudder mis-corrections and that 787 came in really hot
@@carycwilliams .bollocks
0:36 He dipped - and he dipped again.
The titles of clips one and two couldn’t be more inaccurate. Clip four title is dodgy too.
1:35 Hydraulic leak?
🤔 warum zieht er das Fahrwerk rein wenn Brandgefahr entsteht??
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻😎
1:39 that apu looked like it was in afterburner! Charging a lot of usb devices lol
I don’t think that first video is a 787?
I tracked that 747 for hours
RIP vogeltjes
pod never hit the ground!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Are you complaining?
Ahh the 747 is the only trustworthy plane left at boeing
Thanks for including my video of the Condor go-around. Let me know if you would like to use any other videos. I have a Ryanair 737 go around (onboard the actual plane) and a cargolux 747 departing (I was stood next to the runway in the middle). Thanks!
Sadly, no Aerosucrae
I do wish you would extend your videos to at least 5 mins 3 is way to short
ME carriers and pilots living up to their reputation - again.
2:00 did anyone else think of the channel name 'Love Flight Jack' as 'Love Flapjacks' or is just me? 🤣🤣
It's just you.
That's the first time DHL ever did anything in a hurry!
That 787 cross wind landing was tragic. The 747 decision to return was rather odd because Boeing suggest continuing is the better option, and that 757 was, literally, being flown by a lunatic.
Not an expert, just a private pilot here but i would've done the same, why risk it? Also a comment above mentions there were hydraulic problems, so that alongside the bursted tires on the main gear would be enough to make that call i guess?
As others noted, they suffered hydraulic and cabin pressurization problems, turning back was the clear choice.
@@RonaldPottol - I’ve not seen anywhere that the 747 suffered anything more than blown tyres. People have speculated that blown tyres could create further damage but that’s just hypothetical. If all they have are blown tyres then the Boeing procedure is to continue, all things considered.
@@estebandiaz8688 .its a commercial operation . If “ why risk it “ was the only criteria you’d cost the company millions of pounds . As has been stated boeing advice is to continue , unless there are other factors involved which hasn’t been stated
People who love 3 minutes of aviation
👇
Not begging
Yes you are stop begging for likes kid
@@Deionburns114 Shut em' down
( 🌿White Gipsy Horse )
In aviation "almost"does not count.
Wrong subject. Drama queen. The pilot didn't fail the crosswind landing, just a bit mismanaged, but he landed without damaging anything, other than ego, so no failed landing.
That was close
dispersion to muslim countries as policies
if you fail changi, your batam or KL.
no-seconds
that works wonders
Your captions leave a lot to be desired. That Gulf Air B789 never “suffered an engine pod strike”. It just didn’t happen. Why hyperbolize? Why fake it? It’s interesting enough on its own!! You fibbing about it makes you less credible, not the video more engaging!! Keep it up, I’ll unsubscribe.
They said "almost" in the video. That was true. We're you having a bad day?
Nobody gives a hoot you goofball
كل شركات (شركة ) الطيران المصرية 💻⚡✈️🇪🇬
Oops
still no conversation about plane that fell out of the sky in brazil. seems that you guys are sell outs
Did the aircraft crash? The only "fail" here is your BS drama captioning.
As usual
Idiotic headline.
Foreign pilots are terrible
idiotic title
Basic error…dip your wing level into wind and keep plane lined up with rudder…back to PPL basic training good boy?👍🏴
If the wings are level and the rudders are pointing the the plane at the runway you’re going to drift down wind
@@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549the wing not wings…they are dihedral…so you have to dip level the one wing into the wind. That stops the wind pushing you off the centreline and into a bank. So you dip into the wind and rudder to centre line. Are you a pilot?
LUL
Meow
Woof
🐈💨@@sanddabz5635
🐈💨@@sanddabz5635
First to comment
You’re not, but your boyfriend still loves you.
No one care
@@xploration1437 -_-
@@xploration1437 they're getting engaged on a Boeing 737
@@xploration1437 Uh oh, I'm 22nd. I hope this doesn't call for a breakup.
What a failure 😔