A large selling point of k&f is that their ball heads almost always huse arca swiss, which is supported by most camera cages and L brackets so you dont have to worry about removing your tripod plate or place your camera on the table with a weird square underneath it. it's also standardized for a lot of brands now including some gimbals, so it's kind of backwards to still get a tripod with a proprietary mount in 2024
Great point - pretty sure that's true of all of the K&F Concept models I have. Though a lot of manufacturers still have their own plates/systems - it really all depends what situations you use your camera in, and what you want to standardize on
Very informative. I'll be traveling next year, and I usually go with a Sony A7IV and Tampon 35-150 + a Sigma 50mm. I've been a Manfrotto user for ages, and have those 200-PL plates pretty much attached to everything. K&F definitely wins on price (which is very tempting), but Manfrotto is who they are for a reason. I guess it really comes down to how often these will be used, given the fact that they are designed to be mobile, and I can't see taking one out of a bag more than a handful of times a year. Much to consider...
Deberías comparar trípodes del mismo precio, ya que al valer mas de el doble, no puedes recomendar ninguno de los dos, y si ambos cumplen la misma función gana el menos costoso, gracias...
No necesariamente, depende de las características que estés buscando. Además es imposible encontrar dos modelos al mismo precio, por lo que siempre habrá alguna variación.
A large selling point of k&f is that their ball heads almost always huse arca swiss, which is supported by most camera cages and L brackets so you dont have to worry about removing your tripod plate or place your camera on the table with a weird square underneath it. it's also standardized for a lot of brands now including some gimbals, so it's kind of backwards to still get a tripod with a proprietary mount in 2024
Great point - pretty sure that's true of all of the K&F Concept models I have. Though a lot of manufacturers still have their own plates/systems - it really all depends what situations you use your camera in, and what you want to standardize on
Very informative. I'll be traveling next year, and I usually go with a Sony A7IV and Tampon 35-150 + a Sigma 50mm. I've been a Manfrotto user for ages, and have those 200-PL plates pretty much attached to everything. K&F definitely wins on price (which is very tempting), but Manfrotto is who they are for a reason. I guess it really comes down to how often these will be used, given the fact that they are designed to be mobile, and I can't see taking one out of a bag more than a handful of times a year. Much to consider...
Thanks Duane! Yeah they're both great for that purpose, as you said, it's evaluating the pros/cons to see which is a better fit.
Deberías comparar trípodes del mismo precio, ya que al valer mas de el doble, no puedes recomendar ninguno de los dos, y si ambos cumplen la misma función gana el menos costoso, gracias...
No necesariamente, depende de las características que estés buscando. Además es imposible encontrar dos modelos al mismo precio, por lo que siempre habrá alguna variación.
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Thanks Ashlye! 🙂
I just use the K&F today for a food photo shoot and it’s was not good 😫😫😫😡😡😡😡😡
What happened? What was the issue?
What happen?
@@StefanusWijayanto-w1e I forgot what happened but the camera kept tilting over
Twice the money for pretty much the same tripod..sorry not going to pay that just for the Italian name.
The K&F's a great value, but there's some differences between it and the Manfrotto.
Manfrotto have been around for a long time and sell lots of spare parts. They don't need to drop their prices to compete, they have the reputation.