How to significantly boost FPS in Starfield (works on every PC)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 окт 2024
- Quick tutorial on how to boost fps in Starfield. note that this method makes textures more blurry, but at least its playable.
#Starfield is badly optimized to begin with .. just as most games nowdays, this problem comes from the fact that most things are "A.I." generated so devs dont have to put much work into things, but unfortunetely this means there won't be any optimization at all.
on the moment i saw that Starfield requires SSD, i knew it will be shit optimization. if devs are too incompetent to make game run off of HDD, then they surely won't put any effort towards other optimization.
but this method allows you to lower render resolution below 50%, which can significantly boost your fps.
✔️ Become my Patron! Support my work - / sethioz
✔️ Need high speed anonymous VPN? - torguard.net/a...
TorGuard.net discount codes:
30% off for life = TSP30
50% off Promo + Free Dedicated IP (1 per user) = Sethioz50PromoFDIP
50% off for life = available for my Patrons only!
✔️ Sethioz Reviews --- / sethiozreviews
UPDATE - Graphics mod that gives you 20%+ performance boost - ruclips.net/video/GNyjMyexPsI/видео.html
Help keep my channel going, support me on Patreon = www.patreon.com/Sethioz
Need high speed anonymous VPN? = torguard.net/aff.php?aff=3961 (use TSP30 code for 30% lifetime discount)
Check out my other 3800+ Videos = ruclips.net/user/SethiozProjectvideos
No exclusive fullscreen in 2023 is WILD
welcome to the era of lazy developing ... they probably did it so they can easily slip to 2nd screen to watch their pr0n..
@@SethiozProject 💀💀💀💀💀💀
I have a mix of medium and high setting on a 3070ti and a r7 5800x on 1440p anfd only get 30-50 fps. Absurd.
Me too. I have a 3070ti, a i5-11400 and 32GB RAM and it's installed on a NVMe drive. With shadows at low I can manage around 40 fps on 1440p. And the game still looks worse than Fallout 4. DLSS would make all the difference - at 1440p, no ray tracing I can hit well over 60 fps consistently on the highest settings in Cyberpunk.
I have 2060 and it's the same for me. Whatever options I choose, it's always about 30fps when I'm outside, and 60 when inside.
well you doing something wrong, i have GTX 1080 and i get 40-60+ fps with my modded files. people never look in description or pinned comments .. i have updated video on further optimization.
there's also low-texture pack available at nexusmods, it's 4.5gb for quarter and about 9.5gb for half. it doesn't make a huge difference, but my settings shown on other video make further improvements.
i force game into 1440p with FSR2 upscaling on 40-50%. on this video i show it on 30% at 4k, but that's worse than 1440p with 50%.
i can't imagine how you getting 40fps with 3070ti .. you should easily get solid 60. don't forget to follow all the steps i show or you might be stuck on older settings and check the updated video.
@TrueRennard 2060 is quite low tho, it's about same as gtx 1070 ti, which is their minimum requirement. devs nowdays expect 30fps with minimum setup, but you should be able to get over 30fps. i have GTX 1080, which is slightly better than 1070 ti and 2060 and i usually get 40+ fps anywhere, it drops below 40 very rarely.
watch my updated video, read description and pinned comment.
This may sound silly but if i dont have FSR2 but have FSR3 instead. Is that the same thing basically or nah?
common sense says that anything with higher number should be improvement from previous. you can simply google for them to learn what the difference is.
Upped my FPS from 32 to 45. Great video bro.
how do you see fps? my amd software doesnt show fps for starfield
i use shadowplay, i think AMD uses "raptr" which si shadowplay equivelant, they might have renamed it. you have to enable it or use any other screen recorder or tool to display fps
I tried it but I cant even see anything so much blurry it got, not at all like the results you show here
btw the blurriness was the light quality settings, not the downscale, leaving it at medium or even high doesnt change performance(???) and fixes the blurriness
just amazes me how poorly its optimised, i spent all of yesterday trying settings, monitors, resolutions, barely any fps difference. im on a 3090ti and in first city and starting area wasnt getting above 60 fps , in the first mission area 100+ but kinda a given. i just gave up trying ultrawide 1440p and stuck it on my 1080p monitor hoping it just benefits as i progress the game 😆
you better have 120hz monitor, otherwise you're just wasting power of your GPU.
but yeah on 3090ti you should easily get 120fps in native 4k
i don't have a super gaming rig, but i can run well optimized games just fine, here's proof ruclips.net/video/QIc4QK6NpIk/видео.html
there's just no excuse why starfield lags so bad. as you can see from that video, graphics in those other games look even better, yet they run smooth and they are installed on 5400rpm hdd... while starfield stutters even on ssd.
Expecting a modern game to run well on a hard drive in 2023 is a bit absurd.
completely the other way around dear.. do you understand how computers work? difference between ssd and hdd?
i get so angry when people talk nonsense, a MODERN game should be OPTIMIZED and run better than jurassic games, that's how it works!
but "modern" games have 0-optimization, they hog resources for no reason at all. if you know how computers work, you'd understand this.
good example is: why do menus have more lag than actual game? when i open my inventory, i get 30fps, even tho in the area i'm at, i could have solid 60fps (like the moon base i was in). do you see anything better graphics-wise in the menu?
so why does it take twice the resources to render the menu? 20 year old games had better menus than starfield, so why do you need SUPER COMPUTER to render a simple menu that could be rendered on 20 year old PC?
can you not see how wrong this is?
also ship editor is very laggy and there's no background at all, there's no physics either. it's just drag and drop parts, even without any parts on ship, it still lags a lot more than gameplay itself.
how can you not understand any of this?
or explain to me, how did Dying Light 2 devs make it run so smooth? i can run it in 1440p on high or even ultra settings and i get solid 60fps.
or Forza Horizon 5, look at the graphics in there! it's far better than starfield and i can run forza horizon 5 in 4k with only 30-80% GPU use.
how can you say something that dumb . .is just beyond my understanding. please learn how computers work before saying nonsense like that. a well optimized game with same visuals would take 90% less resources to render same kind of graphics. that's a FACT. you're just used to crap software that is badly optimized ... just like all the websites nowdays, they make them BIGGER, SLOWER and EAT more resources for no reason at all.
websites nowdays take gigabytes of space, WHY? they just add all the garbage there cuz they are too dumb to program. same with games ... just please learn how computers work!
this nonsense just makes me so angry how people have 0 idea how computers work .. it's like those who say "GET MORE RAM TO RUN GAME IN 1000FPS!"
@@SethiozProject Before I say anything, yes the game is unoptimized, however, you're completely wrong about it being the other way around. If you don't have enough ram, then your pagefile will be used which means that when you have an hdd, your game will run slower than someone with an ssd.
You also make a ton of statements that paint a picture of you not knowing what you're talking about.
"explain to me, how did Dying Light 2 devs make it run so smooth? i can run it in 1440p on high or even ultra settings and i get solid 60fps.
or Forza Horizon 5, look at the graphics in there! it's far better than starfield and i can run forza horizon 5 in 4k with only 30-80% GPU use."
You are comparing multiple games with different game engines. Each game engine has its own capabilities. Starfield is made with creation engine, which is already known as an outdated engine in need of a massive overhaul, they claim they have already done this for Starfield, but we can obviously tell they lied or stretched the truth about that.
"websites nowdays take gigabytes of space, WHY? they just add all the garbage there cuz they are too dumb to program".
Websites can take gigabytes of space because most websites these days are dynamic and written with JS or similar languages rather than static html. The part that is taking up most of the storage is often the libraries that are used, or site content such as videos or images.
Now how you went from complaining about expecting an hdd to be an acceptable storage device for gaming in 2023 to complaining about websites makes me think that whole response is a joke.
@@SethiozProject Games are badly optimized, but there is no way that it will be as fast on an HDD, that's just simply impossible.
@@lightechoes The only reason you could be saying what you're saying is if you have no clue how either actually works so please stop pretending to know what you're talking about because you read a couple reddit comments once or something.
@@SethiozProject are you on blood pressure medication? 😂
id rather just not play the game if i have to go to potato quality to make it playable. Bethesda fucked up with this one
yeah they did mess up bad.. i just tried low texture pack mod, but it doesn't seem to do much. my BIGGEST complaint right now is that it doesn't support exclusive fullscreen, it's really a performance hog.
check the pinned comment, there's another method. if i find anything better, i'll make another video. i'm able to get 40+ fps which makes it barely barable, but still bad, graphics aren't that good.
I get a solid 55-60fps on a rtx 2070 super at 1080p medium settings... If you are not trying to run it at 4k chances are the games going to run fine.
@Wilberstien game is total crap, it won't let me change to exclusive fullscreen and it doesn't let me change resolution, so that's only option.
you kids need to learn how computers work
@bl33zy52 i've been building computers since i was like 5 and i have 150+ on mensa. what's yours? you kids talk trash. you're one of those who been doing everything wrong and refuse to even admit that you're a tosser with low IQ.
i invented game trainer. if you wouldn't be so dumb, you'd learn to do research and you'd find my forum and find proof of all the hacking i've done. i do things you can't even dream of kid, you clearly don't know how computers work.
ever used truecrypt? know how it works? no ofc not .. cuz you're too dumb for it.
i have so much sensitive data on my PC that i must use truecrypt. i'm the end level master in computers and if you wouldn't be so hopelessly DUMB, you'd know how to use search engines within certain time and look how far back my stuff goes.
i've been doing computer stuff since dial-up days. it was fun days when ISPs stored bandwidth limits on your PC, decrypt and change and have unlimited free internet. . i bet your dumb ass never knew it.
i even wrote a PoC (proof of concept) on how to clone entire DSL connection and have free internet. so go insult someone else dumb kid. now get blocked from my channel you tworp
dont bother doesnt do anything
dont do anything??? i literally went from 20fps to 50! .. you clearly have not tried and clearly you don't understand what render resolution is or means. or your pc is just broken and something else is limiting your frames (maybe you have limited frames in nvidia settings?)
i wish i knew the answer ive been trying everything. i have an i9 9900kf 3080ti with 32gb ram and im getting 20fps. ive done everything i can in the settings of the game and ive watched numerous vids read forums but im getting nowhere@@SethiozProject
@@bl33zy52 Actually that's very wrong. I much rather play on 90fps in shit quality than 30fps in good quality. You're just edgy, grow up
@raymartin1912 by any chance are you using any auto-optimization tools? this sounds like the issue one of my friend's had long ago in GTA 5. he accidentally used some nvidia's optimization feature and it completely messed up his game. he was stuck on around 20fps aswell and he's no newbie with PCs, he tried reinstalling nvidia drivers and game, but nothing fixed it.
i think in his case he forgot to delete some setting files that are NOT deleted when uninstalling the game or nvidia drivers.
check your GPU usage, it should be like 20-30%, no more with 20fps. if it's close to 90% or above, then you have faulty GPU for sure.
but i suspect you have applied some auto-optimize via nvidia. geforce experience has this dumb auto-optimize garbage that does more damage than good.
could also be related to win11 if you have one. in win10 you should be able to turn on "gaming mode", maybe in win11 you have same. this should prevent any background trash from running when playing.
also windows itself has this "game bar" or whatever, this could interfere with it aswell.
i don't use any 3rd party garbage and i have it all disabled, hard to tell what the exact issue is, but it's definetely not the game causing this limit (unless you somehow limited your FPS to 20 in some .ini files)
Bethesda claims game needs SSD: Games that look better and are as big or bigger and work just fine on a high end HDD or hybrid. learn to code Bethesda.
exactly! it's nice to see someone with brain for a change .. most people are like "its modern game it needs modern computer" which just makes 0 sense.
Dying Light 2 is perfect example, it has amazing graphics and it runs quite well. i get solid 60fps in 1440p and it's on 5400rpm HDD, takes about 2 mins to load at start, but after that no lag or stuttering.
we're just living in era of wasted resources and monetization before quality..
@@SethiozProject The game was developed on a new game engine (Creation Engine 2 TM) Using Windows 11 with Future proofing for the soon to be released next gen PC and Console Tech. They ask people to put it on an SSD so it doesn't need direct SYSTEM memory to run. It was a suggestion to help it not crash on mid and up rigs due to memory capping. As per your example dying light 2 is a much much SMALLER game with a lot less going on under the hood at any given moment, to a point they even developed it on the exact same engine used for DL1 and DI/DIR (Different Devs same Engine). Just wait till ES6 or the next Fallout title drops bet you neither will work on anything less than a 2022 High End Rig and Xbox series X with downscaling .
@onisensei443 i don't care what tech they used. final result is BAD and runs like a donkey. starfield runs 4-5x WORSE than well optimized games from 2019-2023 (such as far cry 6, forza horizon 5, dying light 2, cyberpunk 2077 ..etc) are you saying that modern games should run 4-5x WORSE than older games that had even better graphics?
look at some resident evil games, character models are amazing. beyond two souls was released 2013 on ps3 and it has better character graphics.
i get the point of running it directly from ssd, but clearly it isn't working. game crashes all the time, still stutters and maps are smaller than in many other games. map size is about 4x4km. go ahead and try, land and then walk in same direction. once you get about 2000-2500 meters from ship, you'll encounter invisible wall.
this tech is worse than from before 2010, they have open world with LOADING SCREENS, how pathetic is that?
you're missing the ENTIRE point, who cares about what they use or how they did it? imagine going to a fast food restaurant, ordering a burger and fries .. it takes them 30 minutes to make it, you get only half baked burger with raw parts, sauce is under the burger, so bottom bun is soaked, while there's nothing in middle, fries are all un-even and cooked at different levels, one is crispy, one is soft and next is raw potato.
and on top of that you get flat soft drink that tastes like donkey's bottom hole.
would you smile and say "thanks, this new tech is really awesome, keep up the good work"? or would you say "give me my money back"?
ever heard about "don't re-invent a wheel"? this is exactly what starfield is trying to do. we have amazing games that run smooth as butter, but they have to use some nonsense and make a game that runs worse than donkey riding a snail. stop defending a game that is BADLY optimized. or well, unoptimized.
Not to dog pile my guy but the creation engine 2 is a reskin of their old creation engine and was new and innovative in 2001@@onisensei443
It's amazing how Todd still can't optimize a game after 20 years in the industry.
i don't think it's about "can't", it's about "don't care". devs are super rich and running super computers, so they don't care if it doesn't work properly.
Robocop rogue city has really good graphics aswell and that runs smooth on my PC aswell and it runs from HDD. starfield is just super broken and they don't care, it's broken code.
@@SethiozProject BGS games are notoriously broken, something is obviously not right here.
Hello, thanks for the upload and help regarding this small seeming yet impactful tweak!
I do not like that I cannot run the game exclusively in fullscreen without this borderless windowed shit ....but, I may have found something. hop back into the prefs file and change the bBorderless=1 to bBorderless=0
I did this and I am now running the game at full 1440p ( i have a 1440p monitor) with a 1080ti evga ftw edition card. Anyhoot, if this has been covered by you then apologies , but all in all hope it helps!
it doesn't work ... it will make a small window in middle of screen, totally useless
@@SethiozProject hmm that's odd. I rechecked it several times and it even after changing resolutions and reverting back to my native 1440p it stayed the same - full screen no window borderless crap. even before popping on a mod that sets this anyways. 🫡 I decided to hold off the game though ....my rig is seven years old ( strong and plays newer games great on ultra and full resolution 1440p) , but the time seems to have come for a new. again thanks for the information 👍
try playing in 1080p on 1440p monitor and you see what i mean. i have 4k monitor and i want to play in 1440p, but it won't let me. if i turn borderless off, it won't stretch. it just keeps it in smaller window.
my pc isn't much newer either and it can run optimized games like a dream, so don't blame it on your PC, it's bad developing!
if game is unable to run smooth with low graphics, it's not your PC, it's developers incompetence. i can run forza horizon 5 in 4k with FSR on "quality" and most things on high or ultra, it only uses 30-80% of my GPU and i get solid 60fps.
dying light 2 also runs fine in 1440p and off of 5400rpm HDD, no issues. takes 2 mins to load on start, but then smooth 60fps without stuttering or loading.
but starfield lags everywhere and it also crashe a LOT. i have at least 1-2 crashes per session, it's ridiculous ... i even downloaded super low texture pack, so textures look like out of 2005 game and it still lags ... there's just no point blaming devs incompetence on your PC. its NOT your PC, its bad programming.
fuck , sucks that didn't help you out...but yeah I agree wholeheartedly about the game needing some serious optimizations! I know the game just came out , but I really wish it was separetely optimized for pc and consoles ... oh well- gonna give it about 6 months to a year before I play it. Sticking to Baldurs gate 3 instead - take care! @@SethiozProject
p.s. wonder if it was locked for 30 fps or something too? hopefully it all smooths out eventually
fuckin love ur voice dude
To be fair the game is not "Badly Optimized". Todd and Bethesda both stated it was made with "THE LATEST TECH IN MIND". We currently sit at the edge of true next GEN tech for PC and Consoles as such Starfeild (Which was made on a NEW NEXT GEN GAME ENGINE (Creation Engine 2) not the same one as Skyrim and Fallout 4(Creation Engine 1)) was made with future proofing in mind. Most people who complain about the state of the game went into it with rigs that did not meet the recommended settings, or had to much eating up there GPU/CPU usage prior to game launching. On the streamer side obviously it won't run well even on a high end rig the stream soft and game will fight over ram and CPU usage. I played it just fine on a 9 year old mid spec rig from cyberpower PC with solid 30-32fps (Partly because I'm not an idiot who obsesses over FPS which should only matter to people who play games professionally or competitively anyway. 30fps is perfectly fine for normal play). They even went so far as to make a custom GPU just for the game I really don't see how they could have been ANY clearer about the SPECs needed. Everyone should just stop now anyway making mods or overplaying the game now is pointless, Bethesda always drops 4 major DLC per game (They actually made and not published) and everyone will invalidate mods. I only played during the 5 day pre-run then opted to drop it till all 4 come out so the entire game is still fresh when I run the DLC. The most common thing that ruins games these days are gamers not devs lol
more nonsense by an IDl0T who has no common sense. here ruclips.net/video/QIc4QK6NpIk/видео.html you can see games with similar graphics run smooth as butter.
those games run smooth in 1440p and 4k on 5400rpm hdd and have no problems, so what is the point of this "latest tech" that is worse than "old" tech? are you one of those no brainers who thinks that "modern" tech should run worse and cause more problems?
just stop talking nonsense if you don't understand anything. nobody cares what tech they use, what i care about is final result, which in starfield is slow, constant crashes, requires 4x more powerful PC to get 60fps than in any other game with same or better graphics and it won't even run from ssd.
no brainers like you just make me mad. every developer obviously finds excuses and lies, have you ever heard any developer say "yes we are lazy and did bad programming"? they have to make up excuses and no brainers like you believe every word they say, while TRUTH is that they released it half-cocced with spaghetti code.
think you're so smart? lets start by you answering what RAM means, what it's used for and how it works. then answer what is the difference between VRAM and RAM.
then answer what is more important, SPEED of RAM or AMOUNT of RAM if you want to get better performance.
and then answer: what determines the max speed of your RAM that you can benefit from (you can have faster, but you won't benefit from), so what component in your PC bottlenecks that?
and also what tools do you use to monitor your resource usage? how do you analyze whetever game is badly optimized or not?
I'm 100% sure you can't answer any of those questions without asking from an "expert". if i'd ask you those in person without you having the ability to look them up first, you'd just stand there with your mouth open like oOOO what does any of that even mean.