Credit to Martin for sharing his game, I really like the fact he was willing to choose a game that not only showed his strength but also his weakness. Very interesting to watch and hear his thoughts especially for me as I'm now starting to face gambit style players. Enjoyed the anylasis and all the pointers along the way, great format which I personally find refreshing to see as its just a bit different but still has that instructional value
I found the position with the domination of the rook on h2 instructive - in that position, I'd take care of my backrank first with some luft but then several plans come to mind - such as advance my h pawn with the goal of restricting his h pawn to keep that rook buried, centralize my king (as endgame kings should be), and realize that his rooks are essentially dead because he cannot move his other rook due to a back rank issue, in terms of piece activity your bishop and knight are far better than his rook, and your other rook is much better than his which is stuck guarding the back rank, therefore a rook to the 7th rank or g- file with may also be a good plan along with advancing your pawn majority. On the g-file he meets Rg5+ with Kf1 which you can meet with Be2+ which he responds with Ke1 which allows your rook to invade on the 1st rank with a skewer to his other rook winning it and the game
@@Dr.CansClinic I meant to give you some feedback on the length of the video. I initially thought, '40 minutes, that's a bit long!' but it flew by and didn't seem long once you started watching it. I have started your Chess Crime and punishment course now and it is first class in explaining important concepts. Your chess teaching is absolutely brilliant.
I like this format, because it shows some typical mistakes that amateur players make. You cannot get these kinds of lessons from GM games, because they don't do these mistakes.
Great video - not too long because your analysis is both educational and entertaining. Your love of the game and genuine desire to help others improve their game is obvious. Kudos to Martin for sharing his game.
Improvement suggestion: make evaluation bar visible during analysis e.g. in this case to show Martin when he thinks he is only up a pawn that maybe he actually has much bigger advantage/disadvatange due active/burried pieces!
Thank you Darko. I thought about it, but probably it is best to keep it away as I don't want to be affected by the bar while giving my live reactions. Perhaps I will also make some evaluation mistakes ☺️
nice analysis. was this a blitz game? for me it is a bit sad that black didn't appreciate his knight pair. they were crazy dominating and worth a rook each. people should forget that simple economical thinking like: knight = 2,75 or 3 points. rook = 3. it takes away attention and makes you miss chances.
I just saw this series for the first time. I find it very educational and entertaining. I think it would be even better if you switched directly to the analysis board that you show in the last 10 minutes when the need for an explanation arises, even if that would certainly be a bit more complicated. Otherwise, thank you for this content. It was really fun to watch.
Thank you so much for your kind feedback! I thought about your proposal, but I think it will cause friction and make the video longer. But I will think more about it :)
Personally, I don't mind the length of the video. Perhaps you can compensate by skipping unimportant parts of the original video. Either way, I still found the video very helpful. Is there a playlist with these videos? Or are there only two of these videos?@@Dr.CansClinic
At 5:30 after Rd1 I'd have done, as you say, Bf5+ losing the bishop but gaining the rook. I also saw Bc2 which would allow check without losing the bishop at all if the rook moves from the file. I didn't spot it was also checkmate. Didn't calculate that far :) What level was Martin at the time?
In my opinion, that rook can't be worth very much, maybe value of one pawn at best, as it literally stuck buried in that corner. So sad. Poor rook is crying 😢
At 23:22 I would have simply moved my rook back to a2, since the pawn is now forfeit if I do. Rd4 looked nice, but Ra3 resolves both threats that I create.
I watched this video in one "breath". I want to say it is not too long for me. Maybe the reason is that I am at the level near to Martin's. I am making similar mistakes, not seeing deeper etc. But that's why we are in the Dr. Can's clinic. To be healed! 😉
Congrats to Martin. Imho he is not considering alternative moves for each move, which isn't important by itself, but builds the habit of calculating the right line.
Thanks for the great feedback, I think you are right. He will study Fundamental Chess Calculation Skills now, and I hope he will start generating more candidate moves :)
Hi coach I have the database which consists of 4.3 million games of gm. I want to learn some instructive ideas or patterns which arise in gm games and apply to my own games. What do you suggest me to do because it is obvious that i cannot go through all 4.3 million games. And how to identify the moment that idea come into play. please help!
That is why you need good books/courses that already distilled key ideas for you. Please check my courses the Art of Exchanging Pieces and the Art of Awakening Pieces for those recurrent and important patterns, many taken from GM games.
@@raajeshchess Then you look at games from your own openings. You can try to guess the moves of the GMs while looking. Or you can look at a bunch of games with rapid speed (2-3 second/move) to have a feeling of broad patterns and which piece is going where in that very opening.
I don't mean to be disrespectful to the players. But it was painful to watch this and I had to shut it off 10 minutes in. FYI I'm rated 2000 lichess. I'd recommend giving an elo range in the description somewhere for what playing range this would be useful for. I found little value in this. This seems like 600-700 elo
It is interesting you say that, as this video got overwhelmingly positive feedback. Perhaps if you continued further than 10 minutes, you would see instructive moments of the art of exchanging pieces and burying pieces. Martin is not 600 ELO but 1200 ELO. But I now added that info on the video title. Thanks for the feedback!
Credit to Martin for sharing his game, I really like the fact he was willing to choose a game that not only showed his strength but also his weakness. Very interesting to watch and hear his thoughts especially for me as I'm now starting to face gambit style players.
Enjoyed the anylasis and all the pointers along the way, great format which I personally find refreshing to see as its just a bit different but still has that instructional value
So nice to hear your kind feedback, glad that you found it useful!
Oh this kind of analysis is really good and help my thinking process
Thank you! Really motivating!
Thank you Martin. Thank you Dr. Can. So instructive! Appreciate it!
Thank you for your motivational feedback 🙏
I found the position with the domination of the rook on h2 instructive - in that position, I'd take care of my backrank first with some luft but then several plans come to mind - such as advance my h pawn with the goal of restricting his h pawn to keep that rook buried, centralize my king (as endgame kings should be), and realize that his rooks are essentially dead because he cannot move his other rook due to a back rank issue, in terms of piece activity your bishop and knight are far better than his rook, and your other rook is much better than his which is stuck guarding the back rank, therefore a rook to the 7th rank or g- file with may also be a good plan along with advancing your pawn majority. On the g-file he meets Rg5+ with Kf1 which you can meet with Be2+ which he responds with Ke1 which allows your rook to invade on the 1st rank with a skewer to his other rook winning it and the game
I love what I just read. Thank you so much for your observations and strong plans!
I really like the length of the video, in longer Videos i am able to delve deeper into the position. 👍 i am learning a lot here
Super nice to hear your feedback, thanks!
Hey Dr Can! I'm a big fan of your coaching! Loving all the insightful videos and frequent uploads! My best wishes! ❤
Ah, so motivating, thanks! ❤️
Great insight thank you. If you could please make a series from the learners perspective would be wonderful
Thank you! What exactly do you mean by the learners perspective?
@@Dr.CansClinic Oh just having the student talking and explaining his decisions was interesting, thank you again
@@SomPrince Thanks! Please stay tuned for more episodes in this series.
Very helpful lesson. Thanks!
Glad it was helpful!
@@Dr.CansClinic I meant to give you some feedback on the length of the video. I initially thought, '40 minutes, that's a bit long!' but it flew by and didn't seem long once you started watching it.
I have started your Chess Crime and punishment course now and it is first class in explaining important concepts. Your chess teaching is absolutely brilliant.
@@briandwi2504 So motivational! Thank you so much for your feedback ❤ Please ask me anything while studying the crime course :)
Thank you, all your video's are great !!
Super happy to hear that, thank you! 🙏
I like this format, because it shows some typical mistakes that amateur players make. You cannot get these kinds of lessons from GM games, because they don't do these mistakes.
Thank you for your kind feedback 🙏 And thanks for sending me your game!
Great video - not too long because your analysis is both educational and entertaining. Your love of the game and genuine desire to help others improve their game is obvious. Kudos to Martin for sharing his game.
❤️ So motivating to read this lovely comment, thanks!
what a fantastic video ! Super helpful !
Thank you so much for your kind feedback! 🙏
I LOVE this format
Super nice to hear it, more is coming soon!
Improvement suggestion: make evaluation bar visible during analysis e.g. in this case to show Martin when he thinks he is only up a pawn that maybe he actually has much bigger advantage/disadvatange due active/burried pieces!
Thank you Darko. I thought about it, but probably it is best to keep it away as I don't want to be affected by the bar while giving my live reactions. Perhaps I will also make some evaluation mistakes ☺️
nice analysis. was this a blitz game? for me it is a bit sad that black didn't appreciate his knight pair. they were crazy dominating and worth a rook each. people should forget that simple economical thinking like: knight = 2,75 or 3 points. rook = 3. it takes away attention and makes you miss chances.
It was a daily game. Thanks for your good insights on that knight pair!
I just saw this series for the first time. I find it very educational and entertaining.
I think it would be even better if you switched directly to the analysis board that you show in the last 10 minutes when the need for an explanation arises, even if that would certainly be a bit more complicated.
Otherwise, thank you for this content. It was really fun to watch.
Thank you so much for your kind feedback! I thought about your proposal, but I think it will cause friction and make the video longer. But I will think more about it :)
Personally, I don't mind the length of the video. Perhaps you can compensate by skipping unimportant parts of the original video. Either way, I still found the video very helpful.
Is there a playlist with these videos? Or are there only two of these videos?@@Dr.CansClinic
@@lindell7318 Thank you for your feedback! I will soon create a playlist as this was the second episode :)
what elo did the player have?
I believe at the time he had 1200 ELO chesscom
At 5:30 after Rd1 I'd have done, as you say, Bf5+ losing the bishop but gaining the rook. I also saw Bc2 which would allow check without losing the bishop at all if the rook moves from the file. I didn't spot it was also checkmate. Didn't calculate that far :) What level was Martin at the time?
Thank you! He as 1200 ELO.
In my opinion, that rook can't be worth very much, maybe value of one pawn at best, as it literally stuck buried in that corner. So sad. Poor rook is crying 😢
Absolutely. It is crying...
At 23:22 I would have simply moved my rook back to a2, since the pawn is now forfeit if I do. Rd4 looked nice, but Ra3 resolves both threats that I create.
That is correct!
It's such a bad rook, that if RH3 was still blocked, I'd probably move it to h1 to force the bishop to trade off for it.
Even that!
I watched this video in one "breath". I want to say it is not too long for me. Maybe the reason is that I am at the level near to Martin's. I am making similar mistakes, not seeing deeper etc. But that's why we are in the Dr. Can's clinic. To be healed! 😉
Super happy to hear that, Darko! The healing process has begun. I have very smart and rule-obeying patients 😅
where can i send a video 👉👈?
You can send it to cankabadayi85@gmail.com
Congrats to Martin. Imho he is not considering alternative moves for each move, which isn't important by itself, but builds the habit of calculating the right line.
Thanks for the great feedback, I think you are right. He will study Fundamental Chess Calculation Skills now, and I hope he will start generating more candidate moves :)
Hi coach I have the database which consists of 4.3 million games of gm. I want to learn some instructive ideas or patterns which arise in gm games and apply to my own games. What do you suggest me to do because it is obvious that i cannot go through all 4.3 million games. And how to identify the moment that idea come into play. please help!
That is why you need good books/courses that already distilled key ideas for you. Please check my courses the Art of Exchanging Pieces and the Art of Awakening Pieces for those recurrent and important patterns, many taken from GM games.
@@Dr.CansClinic yes but I can't afford and can't allocate money for chess separately because of my financial issues i am not financially independent
@@raajeshchess Then you look at games from your own openings. You can try to guess the moves of the GMs while looking. Or you can look at a bunch of games with rapid speed (2-3 second/move) to have a feeling of broad patterns and which piece is going where in that very opening.
@@Dr.CansClinic Thank you
@@Dr.CansClinic Which games to go through wins, draws or losses
I don't mean to be disrespectful to the players. But it was painful to watch this and I had to shut it off 10 minutes in. FYI I'm rated 2000 lichess. I'd recommend giving an elo range in the description somewhere for what playing range this would be useful for. I found little value in this. This seems like 600-700 elo
It is interesting you say that, as this video got overwhelmingly positive feedback. Perhaps if you continued further than 10 minutes, you would see instructive moments of the art of exchanging pieces and burying pieces. Martin is not 600 ELO but 1200 ELO. But I now added that info on the video title. Thanks for the feedback!
Hi
Hi!