Nuke eagle A mix is the structure of the song. All the layers that you put together in the program to make the song, such ass bass, vocals, synths, instruments, and the drums, is called the “mix” in music production.
Maybe it's because I'm old, but I have a hard time judging sound quality when there are no vocals or other "organic" sounds like mic'd horns, drums & guitars, etc.
To be honest, this track is not really suitable for this kind of test. It's very sparse and does not really utilize the full frequency range and dynamics. Would have liked to hear a bigger/fuller production.
A big reason to go the mixing engineer route is to have another set of ears who has never heard it give some advice on mix, especially if they're pros. For ppl with limited fan base and/or budget an online option is convenient obvs. Really wonder what software is automating the process. I have been doing it myself and my tracks are not quite as loud as many others unless they were mastered/released years ago. Has loudness become a necessary evil to maintain levels in playlists, etc., but are we sacrificing sonic integrity/dynamic range? So much music is a synth beat with people yelling on top of it that maybe it doesn't matter? Many pro remasters released because they're supposedly better, sound distorted. I always choose the older mastered copy if I can find it for purer fidelity.
@Chris E. This is good news for anyone who doesn't have the money/gear/skill for professional mastering! As long as the machines won't be able to play and sing like us humans... 😅
I just released tracks through Distrokid under Rodney Wayne Jackson and while I was driving around in a BMW listening to my music on Tidal Apple Car Play I realized my music sound was gained a lot lower than current music. Do you recommend that I utilize Emastered and repost? Awesome video keep grinding !!!👍🏾
just checked the website, they're prices are at least $13.99 / mo now. :( but if I do 1 song a month (very hard for me w/ a 40 / hr week job etc.) that's $13.99 per song which is great because yes engineers are charging $90+. How do we not know that some of these engineers aren't just uploading your tracks to emastered too?
Thank you for creating and sharing this informative video. Your presentation is very good. If anything, I would only say that I'd prefer more practical insight on exactly what one would do, to accomplish one's own mastering step, so that I can understand better what it is that emaster is doing. Or, what it is that *you* commonly do to produce your masters: how do you do it, what tools, and what's happening on a waveform-level. You glossed over this rather quickly and I'd love to know more on that. But overall, excellent - and thank you.
Look like Julian did his job,great vid. You showed you are just as good as an A.I .If you played both in a load studio most wouldn’t notice the difference.
I'm really interested in using this application for demo purposes. To be able to write and present music to whomever it may concern i.e musicians, labels, producers. Just so I can get the idea across in a presentable form other than just my raw mixing. When it comes time to record of fully produced album I will most likely stick to a human engineer.
I loaded an unmastered song twice to see how it turned out. It froze up at 96% both times....never provided a product to even listen to. That was highly disappointing!
BEWARE Of Emastered. They steal your money if you cancel. I have a huge email chain I can provide anyone. The email is between me and their main rep. I asked if I could cancel my yearly membership’s auto renew. When I asked this I was told they would keep my money for the year and cancel me entirely. I still had 9 months left on my yearly I had paid for. They canceled my 9 months without asking after and Im out nearly 200 dollars. Ive been working trying to see if I can get it back since they shouldn’t steal my remaining 9 months. here is what I received… From eMaster’s Main Rep… We are not stealing your money. Read the terms of service and you acknowledge this at check out when you purchase the plan. As stated on our terms: Annual Plus and Annual Professional accounts are billed immediately and are not refundable. IN THE CASE OF A CANCELLATION OR DOWNGRADE OF A Professional OR Plus PLAN NO REFUND WILL BE ISSUED FOR PARTIAL YEARS OR PARTIAL MONTHS. You may cancel your Plus or Professional accounts at any time however, and the cancellation will be instant. This does not tell you you can’t cancel autopay without loosing all of your money and months you paid for. Long story short…. If you want to use online mastering use LANDR or any other. LANDR is chosen in blind tests with real Mastering engineers about 80% over eMastered. LANDR is only chosen 4% less than a professional master engineer in a blind test. Don’t get the company (remastered) with worse results, same price, horrible customer service, and will steal your money should you decide they shouldn’t auto charge your card. BTW they charge your card nearly a month in advance so if you cancel you lose a month you paid for. LANDR has no penalties to cancel and you get the rest of the time you paid for without them sending vindictive emails. Ozone 8 is also chosen far more often then eMastered mixes are. Plus you can rent to own through Splice or Sweetwater for cheaper than eMaster will charge you for an inferior product with the added plus of not being stolen from when you realize Ozone or LANDR get much better results.
@@danielgant2956 that isn't their fault, you had the option to buy monthly for more money. You are the one breaching the pricing contract when you signed up. You can do yearly for 12 months and less money or monthly for double the money.
Great review...I wish you would've picked a more complex track or just a mix and do a somewhat deep dive into your comparison for the slow learners like myself...but thank you so much....still gotta try it for myself
Listening on mobile it really boosts the highs (bit too much imo) would be good to set it to "low" to see if that was a bit more natural but you have to pay for that. Will need to do proper test in my studio.
Forgive my ignorance but what actually does mastering do? Does it just increase the overall volume of a song? And would I be right in saying that mixing is really more important than mastering?
WOW one hugee factor u left out is that emastered gives u a range of mastering options, your master sounded better but only because u didnt adjust the settings the best they could be on emastered, re do the video after trying that out, great job tho !! i personally find that emastered is a bit to sparkly on the top end no matter what you do with the options, almost like too much tape sat but overall a great clear sounded mastering
when you compared them on your daw yours sounded much better but on their web site theirs sounded better but they could have just added a dulling filter on the original when played back on their web site
A while ago there was another option on eMastered called EMASTERED II BETA. Does anyone know what happened to it and do you have the settings for that option? It sounded much better than the ususal EMASTERED I
i uploaded my ameteurish singing and was quite impressed at the mastered version especially when i alterd the compression i felt like emastered was the best results compared to others but sadly couldnt purchase as there is not a single purchase option as i only record the ocassional song throughout the year so i went with another mastering site 🎸👍.
So much subjective snake oil in the biz. I once had an amp repair guy try to sell me a new speaker for my amp because it would give me " a rich, chocolately sound" ...and I was only there because my amp was blown and needed repair to work at all, not because I was looking for a chocolatey tone (whatever tf that is)
Man, I had headphones on (650s with a DAC/Amp) and I cannot hear the difference. Or... maybe I can, but it's too subtle to tell which one is which. Also, your opinion about this service is kinda moot when you're incentivized to promote it. Right?
There's definitely a slight difference. mostly tonally. I've been incentivized to share it, not speak highly of it. Paying for a review isnt the same as paying for a good review.
I'm definitely more of a do-it-yourself type. That being said I wanted to share this for those who are starting and want to have decent mastering without knowing how they do it.
It would be nice to see a track actually downloaded after a master. if they even allow you to get your track back or a copy from them. Could I take it and put it in another daw or engine for it to work? These are the questions I wanted answered. If they do Imbed tracking algarythems to make sure your royalties come back to you. I tried it . Not much difference but it is through their engine. who's to say how that stands up to other engines or daws being played through them. Just because you can press a red button and it plays . Does not mean it works with other engines or daws to put in movies or anything. These are the questions I would like answered.
Tbh, I think just using a beat isnt a fair review as most people who will be using this site will also have vocals on their tracks. The beat wasnt even that great and didnt give a good representation on what people will actually be mastering using the site. It was too wonky of a beat, to many weird things going on. Do a review using a unmastered song with vocals.
@@JulianGrayMedia ah yea I just found this video sorry. However id still say to maybe try a song with vocals for a better representation of the site imo.
Does anyone (Julian) know if this kind of service would work for a rock band recording, as opposed to an electronic track? Seems that acoustic instruments might have a different nuance in terms of the ability to be mastered automatically. Anyone know?
I have tried it for classical music. It didn´t work. First I tried to master a piece where was big dynamic ranges p-fff. Any change to get it clean. I tried next one where was only mp-f, but still a big problems. You have to cut very much of frequences before it doesn´t clip. After that timpani drums, contra basses etc sounds too flat. Hopely they will improve compressing and gate tools for different music styles, cause your song sounds really good. @@JulianGrayMedia
En fait je les ai démasqué et depuis que je leur ai proposé un défi de mastering ils m'ont bloqué sur les réseaux sociaux principaux... Je ne dis pas que c'est une arnaque mais par contre cela suffit pour de la maquette pas plus. Les algorithmes utilisés sont ceux d'izotope ozone en mode automatique... Il faut arrêter de faire briller le miroir aux alouettes il vous suffit de faire l'expérience tout simplement au lieu de vous jeter aveuglément dans ce genre de plate-forme qui bien que sympathique ne vous fera pas un master digne de ce nom ni même personnalisé.... le but à la base dans un mastering c'est de rendre tous les morceaux de d'album cohérent et là ça me semble difficile. Le but du jeu n'est pas de faire la course au volume mais bel et bien de rendre le morceau agréable et également de corriger les petites imperfections ce qu'un algorithme est incapable de faire. Apparemment la vérité dérange car j'attends toujours la réponse de leur part. Oser comparer le travail d'un algorithme et d'un ingénieur du son qualifié c'est comme comparer un chirurgien cardiaque A un défibrillateur automatique...
A service like that can never work, at least not in that form. If you upload one track it will neve sound right. To master a song it needs to be tracked out. If online mastering services let's you upload the entire tracked out song, then in theory it could work. It will NEVER work otherwise
It's often a good idea to outsource multiple masters when you're professionally releasing music. others may have a different perspective you never considered. Almost all major labels do it :)
for some reason when i uploaded a beat to emastered it added this kind of high frequency light fuzz sound and i tried messing with the EQ on the site but it didn't go away. Any one get this problem as well?
well i have a question if we send them an already mastered track and also automated the tempo as by ourself or or automated OTT OR EQ OR REVERB and you wanna make it a little better loud or professional what would happen they will reset what you did??????????
love your mastering, hate emastered mastering, ,, everyone who says it sounds very close to his mastering needs new ears. ITS OVERCOMPRESSED! Use your ears not your eyes. You say yours is overcompressed, in my ears, the emastered version sounds overcompressed.
Even with a good mix emastered is a scam. Avoid it and avoid taking advice in this video. You will get much better results learning to master your good mixes or paying an engineer.
You're getting paid to say all of this. Secondly you can't master a track with out putting it in to stems. This is for bedroom producers that don't know how to get gain with out it clipping to fuck
Okay, so this is a demo of a song created entirely on a computer with no real instruments, and then mastered by an automated system with no human involvement. Isn't this kind of silly? It's automated mastering of fake music. A better demonstration would be to see how automated mastering does with a mix that contains actual instruments played by humans. That is where you will find your dynamics, etc.
I tried mastering a live recording of my band and it actually made it sound worse by distorting my vocals. Other than that it sounded no different to my mix.
Just remember guys, if you don’t have a good mix, you can’t have a good master.
thats the truth
What’s a mix
Nuke eagle A mix is the structure of the song. All the layers that you put together in the program to make the song, such ass bass, vocals, synths, instruments, and the drums, is called the “mix” in music production.
@@NuKeEagle mix
Is the overall balance between instruments that let them to sound great together
Tru tru
video starts at 6:00 and finishes at 6:30
thx bro
My man...👍
I fkn love u
no love heart emoji :(
Thanks bro
I wasted hundreds of $$$$ on mastering, tried this once, made some tweaks, post-master, and finally found the sound I was looking for. Great service.
agreed.
Me too!
We use it for our tracks and those tracks have been played on Sirius XM and college stations dozens of times.. good enough for me!!
Maybe it's because I'm old, but I have a hard time judging sound quality when there are no vocals or other "organic" sounds like mic'd horns, drums & guitars, etc.
Agreed
To be honest, this track is not really suitable for this kind of test. It's very sparse and does not really utilize the full frequency range and dynamics. Would have liked to hear a bigger/fuller production.
A big reason to go the mixing engineer route is to have another set of ears who has never heard it give some advice on mix, especially if they're pros. For ppl with limited fan base and/or budget an online option is convenient obvs. Really wonder what software is automating the process. I have been doing it myself and my tracks are not quite as loud as many others unless they were mastered/released years ago. Has loudness become a necessary evil to maintain levels in playlists, etc., but are we sacrificing sonic integrity/dynamic range? So much music is a synth beat with people yelling on top of it that maybe it doesn't matter? Many pro remasters released because they're supposedly better, sound distorted. I always choose the older mastered copy if I can find it for purer fidelity.
Your master has much, much more low-end in the kick, and that makes the whole track!! Good job :)
i saw that too
eMastered is fascinating and surely saves a lot of work. But Julian´s master is more alive!
@Chris E. Yes, possibly.
@Chris E. This is good news for anyone who doesn't have the money/gear/skill for professional mastering! As long as the machines won't be able to play and sing like us humans... 😅
yours is much better,couse has more energy and more wide opened and dynamic
Your mastering was Louder, Crisp sounding better Great Job.
emaster sound way cleaner
Hi. the comparison should be done at exact the same volume...
Uh, kinda impossible as the mastered versions are always louder... and some masters are louder than others.
@@JHutch tried turning up the volume on the unmastered track to reach the same db?
@@elicantwell thats not a accurate comparison of the mastered tracks volume
I like your master, But when switching between the 2 I think they have the high end tamed a little more. But they both still sound amazing
I already know it's going to be better than what I'm doing now
I just released tracks through Distrokid under Rodney Wayne Jackson and while I was driving around in a BMW listening to my music on Tidal Apple Car Play I realized my music sound was gained a lot lower than current music. Do you recommend that I utilize Emastered and repost? Awesome video keep grinding !!!👍🏾
just checked the website, they're prices are at least $13.99 / mo now. :( but if I do 1 song a month (very hard for me w/ a 40 / hr week job etc.) that's $13.99 per song which is great because yes engineers are charging $90+. How do we not know that some of these engineers aren't just uploading your tracks to emastered too?
Great video, been considering this for a while. I preferred Julian's, seemed a touch brighter but still, pretty close to my ears!
What settings did you use in emastered. Did you just upload and set it? Or adjust the master levels and compression. Thnks
Thank you for creating and sharing this informative video. Your presentation is very good. If anything, I would only say that I'd prefer more practical insight on exactly what one would do, to accomplish one's own mastering step, so that I can understand better what it is that emaster is doing. Or, what it is that *you* commonly do to produce your masters: how do you do it, what tools, and what's happening on a waveform-level. You glossed over this rather quickly and I'd love to know more on that. But overall, excellent - and thank you.
Look like Julian did his job,great vid. You showed you are just as good as an A.I .If you played both in a load studio most wouldn’t notice the difference.
I'm really interested in using this application for demo purposes. To be able to write and present music to whomever it may concern i.e musicians, labels, producers. Just so I can get the idea across in a presentable form other than just my raw mixing. When it comes time to record of fully produced album I will most likely stick to a human engineer.
I loaded an unmastered song twice to see how it turned out. It froze up at 96% both times....never provided a product to even listen to. That was highly disappointing!
That eMastered track sounds great - it sounds smooth and dare I say it, a bit more 'analogue'.
BEWARE Of Emastered. They steal your money if you cancel. I have a huge email chain I can provide anyone. The email is between me and their main rep. I asked if I could cancel my yearly membership’s auto renew. When I asked this I was told they would keep my money for the year and cancel me entirely. I still had 9 months left on my yearly I had paid for. They canceled my 9 months without asking after and Im out nearly 200 dollars. Ive been working trying to see if I can get it back since they shouldn’t steal my remaining 9 months. here is what I received…
From eMaster’s Main Rep…
We are not stealing your money.
Read the terms of service and you acknowledge this at check out when you purchase the plan.
As stated on our terms:
Annual Plus and Annual Professional accounts are billed immediately and are not refundable. IN THE CASE OF A CANCELLATION OR DOWNGRADE OF A Professional OR Plus PLAN NO REFUND WILL BE ISSUED FOR PARTIAL YEARS OR PARTIAL MONTHS. You may cancel your Plus or Professional accounts at any time however, and the cancellation will be instant.
This does not tell you you can’t cancel autopay without loosing all of your money and months you paid for.
Long story short…. If you want to use online mastering use LANDR or any other. LANDR is chosen in blind tests with real Mastering engineers about 80% over eMastered. LANDR is only chosen 4% less than a professional master engineer in a blind test.
Don’t get the company (remastered) with worse results, same price, horrible customer service, and will steal your money should you decide they shouldn’t auto charge your card. BTW they charge your card nearly a month in advance so if you cancel you lose a month you paid for.
LANDR has no penalties to cancel and you get the rest of the time you paid for without them sending vindictive emails.
Ozone 8 is also chosen far more often then eMastered mixes are. Plus you can rent to own through Splice or Sweetwater for cheaper than eMaster will charge you for an inferior product with the added plus of not being stolen from when you realize Ozone or LANDR get much better results.
@@danielgant2956 that isn't their fault, you had the option to buy monthly for more money. You are the one breaching the pricing contract when you signed up. You can do yearly for 12 months and less money or monthly for double the money.
Yours is much better to my ears.
Great review...I wish you would've picked a more complex track or just a mix and do a somewhat deep dive into your comparison for the slow learners like myself...but thank you so much....still gotta try it for myself
Listening on mobile it really boosts the highs (bit too much imo) would be good to set it to "low" to see if that was a bit more natural but you have to pay for that. Will need to do proper test in my studio.
So should we not use any compressors or anything like that prior to uploading into emaster ?
I have the same question but have not got any answers
The unmastered track is hilariously loud and hard limited. It's really bad for mastering and it should be way more quiet and dynamic.
Great review Julian! Well done!
You’re supposed to play the song before and after
Emastered sounds way better, like one package and more professional.
interesting service, I heard the difference. Not bad. Louder and cleaner.
I prefered to hear the version you uploaded because ok we know your master is better but what did emaster actually improved?
Forgive my ignorance but what actually does mastering do? Does it just increase the overall volume of a song? And would I be right in saying that mixing is really more important than mastering?
All it can possibly be is compression, EQ, normalization
Yes the mixing is much more important
Impressive actually, I still enjoyed the separation feeling on your Version but emastered did a dope job imo.
Not bad for sure.
WOW one hugee factor u left out is that emastered gives u a range of mastering options, your master sounded better but only because u didnt adjust the settings the best they could be on emastered, re do the video after trying that out, great job tho !!
i personally find that emastered is a bit to sparkly on the top end no matter what you do with the options, almost like too much tape sat but overall a great clear sounded mastering
when you compared them on your daw yours sounded much better but on their web site theirs sounded better but they could have just added a dulling filter on the original when played back on their web site
That master was very close to your's Julian! That is some great AI but I just dont understand how it can eq overall😮
Dan Arnold it's incredibly good for a computer!
I actually thought eMastered had a cleaner mix, while Julian's was deeper and slightly less highend fixated.
Yours is very clear. emastered is a little rough on low end.
A while ago there was another option on eMastered called EMASTERED II BETA. Does anyone know what happened to it and do you have the settings for that option? It sounded much better than the ususal EMASTERED I
do you guys recommending putting something in the master track before doing this or no?
I put my master song in this and it made the master track sound way better and ❄️
E mastered sounds more commercial
i really like the sound e master did on my masters but its just to quiet compared to modern pro masters...so its almost useless
HD wave lol.. HD isn't audio quality
Man I thought I was being clever with inspect element, but I see others have done the same
But as a consumer who loves music and grew up in the base era I like your mix better
Omg that emastered version is porn for the ears 😍
i uploaded my ameteurish singing and was quite impressed at the mastered version especially when i alterd the compression i felt like emastered was the best results compared to others but sadly couldnt purchase as there is not a single purchase option as i only record the ocassional song throughout the year so i went with another mastering site 🎸👍.
So much subjective snake oil in the biz. I once had an amp repair guy try to sell me a new speaker for my amp because it would give me " a rich, chocolately sound" ...and I was only there because my amp was blown and needed repair to work at all, not because I was looking for a chocolatey tone (whatever tf that is)
Man, I had headphones on (650s with a DAC/Amp) and I cannot hear the difference. Or... maybe I can, but it's too subtle to tell which one is which.
Also, your opinion about this service is kinda moot when you're incentivized to promote it. Right?
There's definitely a slight difference. mostly tonally.
I've been incentivized to share it, not speak highly of it. Paying for a review isnt the same as paying for a good review.
you should buy cheaper headphones....
I believe in your inner deadmau5!
To me, your mastering is much more likable.
I'm definitely more of a do-it-yourself type. That being said I wanted to share this for those who are starting and want to have decent mastering without knowing how they do it.
Good video 👌😁 I thought prices was higher than that 😂 so I never click on the link
emaster isn’t wrkin for me it doesn’t all the way load my song it stops at 95 percent any tips
It would be nice to see a track actually downloaded after a master. if they even allow you to get your track back or a copy from them. Could I take it and put it in another daw or engine for it to work? These are the questions I wanted answered. If they do Imbed tracking algarythems to make sure your royalties come back to you. I tried it . Not much difference but it is through their engine. who's to say how that stands up to other engines or daws being played through them. Just because you can press a red button and it plays . Does not mean it works with other engines or daws to put in movies or anything. These are the questions I would like answered.
Julian, your master is thicker mid low end IMO... but I agree, they did a pretty decent job of it.
I tried emastered and it made my track sound slightly worse (distorted vocals and absolutely no other changes). Am I missing something here?
No you're right. Emastered is a scam. Avoid it.
Avoid like the plague. Here is your clear warning. emastered.pissedconsumer.com/review.html
Unearthly Earthling lol I use it and it made it have that "sound" you can't master a bad mix and expect good results doesn't work that way
Peter Littlefield up your mixing can't master a bad mix bruh
Julians master is definitely louder
Can we master 5.1 and 7.1 channels also in this .. Reply anyone tq
not really - you could probably export stereo stems, get them mastered, then re-encode them into and interleaved ac3/whatever file
how much you charge for mixing and mastering
Send me an inquiry email to inquiries@juliangraymusic.com
Hey Julian could you try the izotope 8 master assistant
Tbh, I think just using a beat isnt a fair review as most people who will be using this site will also have vocals on their tracks. The beat wasnt even that great and didnt give a good representation on what people will actually be mastering using the site. It was too wonky of a beat, to many weird things going on. Do a review using a unmastered song with vocals.
My genre as well as the followers of this channel is techno.
@@JulianGrayMedia ah yea I just found this video sorry. However id still say to maybe try a song with vocals for a better representation of the site imo.
So techno has no vocals? What a stupid response.
Does anyone (Julian) know if this kind of service would work for a rock band recording, as opposed to an electronic track? Seems that acoustic instruments might have a different nuance in terms of the ability to be mastered automatically. Anyone know?
I've yet to try it, but I think the same mastering principals apply.
I have tried it for classical music. It didn´t work. First I tried to master a piece where was big dynamic ranges p-fff. Any change to get it clean. I tried next one where was only mp-f, but still a big problems. You have to cut very much of frequences before it doesn´t clip. After that timpani drums, contra basses etc sounds too flat.
Hopely they will improve compressing and gate tools for different music styles, cause your song sounds really good. @@JulianGrayMedia
Learning to do it yourself is more rewarding
I wonder how it would compare to Ozone?
Julian thank you for your this tutorial. This is a good video, but it needs updating. The pricing options have changed.
*reads description once*
"Lets see how bad it can actually be."
HOW BA-A-A-AD CAN I BE !!
Bru, your mix is much better
Yours actually sound better bro
En fait je les ai démasqué et depuis que je leur ai proposé un défi de mastering ils m'ont bloqué sur les réseaux sociaux principaux... Je ne dis pas que c'est une arnaque mais par contre cela suffit pour de la maquette pas plus. Les algorithmes utilisés sont ceux d'izotope ozone en mode automatique... Il faut arrêter de faire briller le miroir aux alouettes il vous suffit de faire l'expérience tout simplement au lieu de vous jeter aveuglément dans ce genre de plate-forme qui bien que sympathique ne vous fera pas un master digne de ce nom ni même personnalisé.... le but à la base dans un mastering c'est de rendre tous les morceaux de d'album cohérent et là ça me semble difficile. Le but du jeu n'est pas de faire la course au volume mais bel et bien de rendre le morceau agréable et également de corriger les petites imperfections ce qu'un algorithme est incapable de faire. Apparemment la vérité dérange car j'attends toujours la réponse de leur part. Oser comparer le travail d'un algorithme et d'un ingénieur du son qualifié c'est comme comparer un chirurgien cardiaque A un défibrillateur automatique...
I had used it once and it was decent but not loud enough..but it gives a great starting point tbh
Alex Edm If you think mastering is just making the track loud then please stop producing...
just use a limiter ??????
no... if u use FL Studio then maximus is best xD
Adriks 2F Nope, you don't need to make it that complex, just use fabfilter pro l and some stereo shaping on top.
Alex Edm volume is like 75-80% of the master. But it does create tonal & other slight differences from a premaster
I dont think it is ethical. I think we should have to learn how to do it. It's not fair to those who dedicate themselves to learning arts.
Emastered version has more depth n low end focus to my ears idk may b jst for me
A service like that can never work, at least not in that form. If you upload one track it will neve sound right.
To master a song it needs to be tracked out. If online mastering services let's you upload the entire tracked out song, then in theory it could work. It will NEVER work otherwise
I'd wanna hear full bamd
Imagine paying for something you can do in the same program you recorded and mixed in....
It's often a good idea to outsource multiple masters when you're professionally releasing music. others may have a different perspective you never considered. Almost all major labels do it :)
for some reason when i uploaded a beat to emastered it added this kind of high frequency light fuzz sound and i tried messing with the EQ on the site but it didn't go away. Any one get this problem as well?
Swavvy white noise ?
@@jn_beats2579 try, working on the mix in your daw.. see if something could be causing the noise ?
well i have a question if we send them an already mastered track and also automated the tempo as by ourself or or automated OTT OR EQ OR REVERB and you wanna make it a little better loud or professional what would happen they will reset what you did??????????
I dont suggest putting a mastered track through a mastering service.
It should in theory pass the null test afterwards. 😂
They need to go vocals and beat
They just turn the volum up ;(
It does not work, the melody stays and and everything gets quieter by 80% and the hole track is quieter by 50%
What about a 3rd option of having an experienced engineer checking your online mastered track? Example: ruclips.net/video/2WjIVUa782k/видео.html
julian yours is wider in the mids and highs I prefer it for sure
it costs now to get your mix mastered.
love your mastering, hate emastered mastering, ,, everyone who says it sounds very close to his mastering needs new ears. ITS OVERCOMPRESSED!
Use your ears not your eyes. You say yours is overcompressed, in my ears, the emastered version sounds overcompressed.
There's definitely some difference but it's not AWFUL. I could use emastered and be pretty satisfied with it
@@JulianGrayMedia that's what I was looking for. I don't care what can be done better. Is it adequate enough for consumption and distribution.
Julian’s master is better
You suppose to have all plug ins off and turn track down to negative 6 DB's or -3 dB's on the mater track what you did was incorrect
I still wonder where the artist gets f@&%/ed in the process.
They probably own your master track lol
Even with a good mix emastered is a scam. Avoid it and avoid taking advice in this video. You will get much better results learning to master your good mixes or paying an engineer.
Cheers grandad
You are engineer?
@@raffa4510 yea
Track id?
it's my track, paper planes. Not currently released.
Can you master my song
Fun fact, the original track is a paid actor
IMO the e master sounds “better”
You're getting paid to say all of this. Secondly you can't master a track with out putting it in to stems. This is for bedroom producers that don't know how to get gain with out it clipping to fuck
Your mix was better.
Please read reviews about this company before using this website!
mastering contact 2 $
Can you master one of my tracks for free please?
Okay, so this is a demo of a song created entirely on a computer with no real instruments, and then mastered by an automated system with no human involvement. Isn't this kind of silly? It's automated mastering of fake music. A better demonstration would be to see how automated mastering does with a mix that contains actual instruments played by humans. That is where you will find your dynamics, etc.
i've never heard the term "fake music", mind to explain what that is?
I tried mastering a live recording of my band and it actually made it sound worse by distorting my vocals. Other than that it sounded no different to my mix.
This was one shitty comparison...
Lot of musicians dont like to like..lol