Bigfoot caught on tape challenge with the crew needs to happen. I want to see Niko and Sam's effect shots of a non-humananoid Bigfoot creature. Make it happen guys
theres footage that went around around a marine biology boards back in like the early 2000's of an unknown sea animal, not a single scientist could identify it and the person that shot it and posted the footage was a marine biologist too. I beleive i saw the footage talked about on trey the explainer's page.
@@kerzytibok3211 Yeah and they called it a him even though she clearly has breasts, lol. If they didn't point out the breasts, then they barely analyzed these videos and only made assumptions.
Consider that the original Bigfoot video was captured in 1960s and makes me wonder that why it looks much more realistic than a Hollywood movie whether it’s a costume or Cgi
“I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry, and that's extra scary to me. There's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside. ” - Mitch Hedberg
Not only is bigfoot blurry but when bigfoot walks, every step it takes makes the earth shake which leads to shaky camera so before blaming the camera man, blame bigfoot.
@@360.Tapestry Oh 100%. Even people who Know where it came from will go around posting it claiming it's real just for internet clout/attention/memes. Guarantee you it'll constantly get posted on places like tiktok where people pass it off as real just for views.
The interesting part is that Adam and the Corridor guys would give it their best shot and still fall short of the '67 Patterson film --- then they would admit it's a real Bigfoot !!
They were just so disappointed at the quality they were presented with, it was barely an effort for them. At least some of the ufo and ghost videos presented some sort of challenge.
@@kerzytibok3211 they found that original footage the most convincing compared to everything else. That’s a very different thing from being mostly convinced it’s real.
Ya u just gotta get your shins cut, steal the fat suit from the big momma movies, stop by the planet of the apes set, learn how to rock down to electric boogorilladoo. Then you just challenge your camera guy shots, because your gonna look so real he might try to shoot you without the camera!
I laughed when you mentioned adding weight to things when filming because one thing my fiancé and I always call out in movies or shows are people carrying coffee cups that are CLEARLY empty…it’s so obvious, like just put water or something in them! Lol
One trick is to use jello!! Mix up jello in a cup. It solidifies and wont spill or splash around but it still has the same weight as if it were coffee !! Safer to use on set because less likely to spill on equipment or costumes
Remember at end of "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly" how heavy the sacks of gold coins actually were? One can see Eastwood struggling some to lift them onto the horse, and the horse reacting to all that weight. Sure, likely were rocks or sand in those sacks, but one can easily see that they were quite heavy.
I know I’m not the first to suggest this but Corridor should definitely attempt to make the most convincing Bigfoot footage with practical and visual effects. Now whether the attempt is released anonymously or not is another thing to think about
if i had that kind of VFX knowledge and skill i would definitely make videos like that and upload them on a throwaway reddit account just to mess with people
This is actually a terrible idea for anyone invested in keeping Sasquatch as a joke or myth. What would happen is they would try to do their own fakery it would immediately be torn apart by experts all the while giving the PG footage more validity. It’s like the pyramids we couldn’t replicate it if we tried.
I want to see a "Can the Debunkers be Debunked" series. Let Sam and Niko create some footage and do their SFX magic without anyone else at CC knowing. Then have the footage sent anonymously to Corridor. It doesn't have to be bigfoot either- well I want like 5 or 6 of these, so Bigfoot at some point.
I live in Australia and I've lived in the bush for 30 years. 10 years ago when I went for a walk I saw a bigfoot walk across the trail I was on. It was 9 or 10ft tall. It looked at me as it stepped across the trail and it just kept walking through. I shit myself then turned around and walked home. After my experience I looked into the subject and I realised there were thousands of sightings all around the world. I came to the conclusion that every single person is lying or there is actually something out there. I don't believe that thousands of people around the world are lying.
Mic Dodge, a famous woodsman in Washington state, is known for dressing up in a homemade beaver pelt bigfoot costume and trolling bigfoot hunters in the forests up there. He's been doing it for decades. The Discovery channel had a series about him for a while and they filmed him doing it one night. The hoots and howls he would do are almost a perfect match for some the so-called bigfoot recordings. He took trolling to a whole new level.
Are there people doing the same in the nahanni valley, Northwest Territories? Are they taking people and carrying them up a 1000 ft rock face? People, children, have been found in these impossible to reach places.
I'm disappointed in the 2nd clip. They were just like: costume. That's it. Nothing about the height, nothing about the sound, nothing about the tearing apart the tree with it's bare hands...nothing... vs the first one, they had various examples and cgi work done to debunk it.
Fun fact, the Patterson film is the single most analyzed piece of footage ever filmed, with the exception of the Zapruder film of the Kennedy assassination.
Yes, analyzed, but never successfully debunked by anyone (including this video) Edit: I find it problematic that the Patterson-Gimlin film has been SO excessively analyzed and yet not explained away, and yet videos like hyper-simplistic, even dismissive reviews such as this one by the Corridor Crew can be accepted outright. The outcome is not educational nor is it scientific.
Basically made this comment in more length earlier, but you couldn’t even make a skin tight “ape suit” on your own in 1967, and NO one made something like that, that you could just go buy.
@@hamilcar682 Precisely. Though the mastermind behind the costuming for the original Planet of the Apes film was credited by many in Hollywood for making the “ape suit” in the Patterson-Gimlin film, he himself never actually said that he made it. Loren Coleman’s discussion of the history behind all this was I think eye-opening and nuanced. So glad that people like you are making comments on these kinds of RUclips videos. I was displeased to see so many comments supporting the video uncritically.
What impresses me most about the Patterson footage is that all the attempts to re-create it have looked SO BAD. If it's fake, Patterson and Gimlin were better special effects men than anyone who has made a Bigfoot-related Hollywood movie. IMO Jurassic Park was the point at which movie effects caught up. Regarding the gait, the late physical anthropologist Grover Krantz identified some really significant differences with humans. For example, most humans spend 95% of their walking stride with one foot or the other on the ground; Patty has both feet on the ground for 20% of the stride. Humans tend to fully lock their knees at certain points, whereas Patty's knees are notably bent at all times. Closest parallel I can think of is the way SWAT teams move when they're trying not to make audible footsteps. It's not an impossible gait for a human, but it's not the default one either by any means. If you walk like that on the sidewalk you'll look WEIRD. I'm glad you guys brought up Planet of the Apes, because the head costume designer for that movie said he and his team would not be able to produce the Patterson footage. In particular he cited the movement of muscles under the fur, which get hidden by a suit. He said the hoax would require a person of that build, with fur glued to his body. And as far as the dude who claimed to be in the suit? There have been like 6 guys who took credit for that. It's a really quick and easy way to get yourself on the local news.
Yup. There have been a few clowns who claimed to have been the guy in the suit. They couldn’t even take anyone to the filming location. What stumps me about the film is this: let’s say it was a hoax. Let’s say a couple of nearly broke rodeo cowboys came up with a suit, in 1967, that was decades ahead of what the best Hollywood artists could make. And they made the suit a female with large breasts-because, hey, why not make it more complicated than it needed to be? Then they travel deep into the woods on horseback with their accomplice (again, no credible one has ever come forward)… and then shoot just a few seconds of shaky footage. It kind of beggars belief. If they were able to make a costume that good, they could have made far more money in the movie business than they ever did off the supposed hoax. And if someone else made it? No one has ever come forward with a convincing example of the costume. For me it’s easier to believe that Bigfoot exists and Patterson and Gimlin happened to catch a few seconds of shaky footage of one than to believe the preposterous things I’d have to believe to think it was a hoax.
So you find it more believable that a creature could survive for hundreds of thousands of years in almost complete secrecy, with no one EVER finding a dead one or providing any convincing evidence in the year 2024, than some guys being able to rig a Bigfoot costume in the 1960s? Yeah okay. Besides that, John Landis said the costume was created by professional special effects people to fool Patterson. No one has ever accused Patterson of faking the costume himself. Bigfoot believers are no different than Loch Ness Monster hunters or the UFO community. No one ever has any convincing evidence. Just decade after decade of blurry, shaky footage and "I saw something or know a guy who saw something".
And to add one more fun detail: I would point to the head as being the most difficult part of this costume to replicate. If you look closely at it, you notice that the head doesn't have human proportions. In fact, the forehead looks like it gets smaller up top, which is impossible for costumes to do. Especially back then. Costumes can only add, they can't subtract.
Explaining how body proportions, gait, inertia, and environmental adaptation all play a role in how a creature walks was legitimately fascinating. I never thought to debunk Bigfoot clips in that way.
A few thoughts: it's not that common to shoot a large animal and have it drop dead on the spot. Even a good lung shot often sees the animal run some distance before it collapses. Then you would have to track its blood trail to find it. And finding anything dead that is camouflaged for its environment can be very difficult. Having listened to a lot of alleged first hand accounts from hunters on Sasquatch Chronicles, I can offer a few more possible insights- 1) many witnesses say that resemble humans to an extent where it gives them pause before firing. Is it a guy in a suit? Is it a prank? It's said their eyes look very human-like. 2) Most hunters are hunting deer and aren't carrying serious firepower. If you have an ~8ft. creature and you have .270winchester rifle or even a .44mag sidearm, you don't really have stopping power for that animal. 3) There is a theory that they have the ability to emit infrasound capable of subduing humans. Many alleged witnesses claim that their roar freezes you, blanks your mind or otherwise effects the nervous system so that you can't act. Many also say they are left with a residual malaise or morbidity often for several days after that may be an after effect of infrasonic attack.
@@evan_stadler dude, good elk bull doesn’t weigh much less than that. A good moose will be 1000 plus, you can definetely shoot something that big and have a reasonable chance of it collapsing instantly. People absolutely would’ve shot at least one by now.
@@shmekelfreckles8157 yes but it's believed by many that there's typically more than just the one you see so if that's true who knows how many of the 1000s of peaple that go missing every year did shoot and maybe kill one but didn't live to tell the tail since they didn't realize they were out numbered. I'm not saying these things are 100% real but the amount of evidence there is you can't just say "well we haven't killed one so can't be real" that's super arrogant. Not to mention the countless peaple who have seen these things and have permanently changed by the experience. Just open your eyes a little do some research before making bold and arrogant decisions.
To me what immediately indicates the Patterson Footage is fake is the glutes are stiff and don't flex as the "Creature" walks. Seems like the guy was wearing some armor that ends by the butt line under the furry suit.
I love that this is a video basically informing people how to make better Bigfoot footage and I love it! I really hope we get some better stuff out there. AND YES PLEASE DO water creatures! they're creepy AF
better videos? wtf this people actually think that u just ge out u phone and as fast u get a foot on video? even get a bear on video on the wilderness is not that commun get a foot is 1 in a million
@@Mrpizzas664 I kinda thought that. Just so you know you said beer🍺 which is a drink and I think you meant deer, the animal 🦌 in case you want to edit it!!
To debunk that people would be afraid to be that close, you should watch some footage of all the people that get too close to Bison and any other animal at Yellowstone. While most people have common sense there are a lot that don't
In 1976, I attended a lecture by a man named Bob Hieronimous on the history of the Great Seal of the U.S. Many years later, he claimed he was the person wearing the saquatch suit in that first video. He said a friend hired him to play the role but never paid him. You can look him up and read his version of the story.
His story is full of holes. He didn't have a similar gait, didn't have similar proportions and the guy that "offered him 1k" was a retired rodeo showman that was so poor he was taking out loans to pay his bills.
CGI guys- Suit looks great. Stan Winston and Rick Baker...the 2 best to ever creature effects guys. Winston- "It's a guy in a bad hair suit" Baker- "It looked like cheap fake fur"
I'd love if two of the guys secretly made their own footage (practical or CGI) and sneak it into their compilation. Then they pretend they believe it and see what the third guy says!
I just want to say that this show has helped me a lot with understanding movies better. I'm young, and I normally just enjoy the movie because it is a fun movie, but now after watching all of your videos, I have a new perspective on the movies I watch. Thank you
Be careful! Anyone can say ANYTHING! Just as much as these guys claiming that they're able to detect a costume when they clearly can't. Sorry, but I trust an expert with a PhD who said the original film could not be a costume with VERY good reasoning for why over these college dudes, sitting and chillin, mocking, and who have NEVER EVER left the comfort of their indoor plumbing and delivery pizza. Probably drunk and drinking while filling this?! Be more skeptical just as much as these guys are skeptical. They're simply incorrect about SOME of their criticisms and they are legit in others. But remember, ANYONE can say ANYTHING! just like me! So becareful of what you believe.
@@dsbmitchell One reason is that Patterson wrote a book called Do abominable snowman of North America exist??? He drew Patty in it with breast and all.....Two years before he flim her?
@@elsapoelsapo1821 Thanks for your comment. Yes, I am aware of that. While I can understand some people using this as cause for concern, it doesn’t particularly bother me. Researchers and scientists generate hypotheses all the time that they will find such and such data to support this or that theory, and quite often they actually end up turning up just such evidence that goes against a null hypothesis. As a scientist myself, I am well aware of this. I don’t see much difference in what happened with the Patterson film. Moreover, if these hairy hominids exist, compose a breeding population, and one of them was captured on film, there is more than a small likelihood that the subject filmed would be a female since females as well as males are in fact needed to sustain such a breeding population. In all, I see no problem with the fact that the subject was a female or bore similarity to some of Patterson’s previous work (which was itself similar to another popular reported sighting). I think interested investigators should focus on the subject in the film itself (its anatomy, biomechanics, etc.) rather than the person behind the film, and allow that evidence to speak for itself. Edit/Update: I now have a copy of Patterson’s book, and the majority of the drawings in the book are of male Sasquatch-not female ones. So there does not seem to be any indication that he had some sort of pre-conceived plan to specifically film a female Sasquatch.
@@dsbmitchell Most people don't know the background of the hoax. Roger was making a movie, where he and his bigfoot buddies were going to hunt down bigfoot. Bob Heironimus and his brother Howard starred in it too, along with Bob Gimlin as an Indian tracker. Roger ended up dumping the project as he couldn't get the further funding from his wealthy brother in law Al DeAtley so he sold the film as a real life encounter instead. Roger's co-worker Janos Prohaska, in working with ANE built the costume. The head piece used was a taurean head created by Wah Chang. It was common practice, and still is, to put together parts of different costumes to make "new" ones.
Bigfoot believers say that “it’s impossible to walk bending your knees at an almost 90 degrees angle” and yet the guy in the stock footage next to Patty perfectly does it lol
I could be wrong but the left footage at 6:19 looks like it could be their studio, meaning they have a Bigfoot suit and might be filming something like this soon
I want to see the corridor crew make their own cryptid footage with their own original monster! Though it would need a big watermark in the corner saying "THIS IS FAKE" or else it would be shared a million times on facebook lol also deep sea creature episode yes!
Right at the end, Sam said exactly what I was about to comment. The old OG footage looks more convincing than anything else that has ever been presented as a Bigfoot on camera. Nothing even comes close, and that's so disappointing. I'm not saying 100% that it's an impossibility that there could be something out there, but no video has ever come close to convincing me. The most realistic Bigfoot that's ever been filmed is Hary from Hary and the Hendersons. That costume was some of Stan Winston's best work. The hair and the expressive face were amazingly well done and very natural looking. I honestly don't think anybody will ever get as good as that. Can't wait to see the oceanic cryptid debunk video.
The Corridor guys didn't want to admit it in this video --- but the way they were looking at the Patterson film at the end convinces them it's not a hoax but a real creature!
Here's a fun fact that I don't get to share often, but figured it would be fitting to share here tho, my dad knew the guy in the gorilla suit in the first clip( 1:05 ). My dad even took me to where it was taken too.
When the Patterson film was the first to pop up, it was a bit disappointing that they didn’t look into it as far as other researchers have. Being such an old video and considered the best, it’s been used and looked at a lot.
Yea and they said the proportions were human when there clearly not. Aswell as they just keep saying it's a guy in a suit for like every video. Disappointed in this video as well
@@evan_stadler ya there's muscle movement under the fur, it's clearly female which is an odd choice for a costume and it's gait is not human. They can't make that as a costume right now let alone back then. Those planet of the apes costume look goofy in comparison. The guy who claimed he faked it had no proof, it was simply his word. This was a lazy effort to debunk and I honestly expected better.
@@XxDemon23xX Did I say it was real? I laid out reasons that the footage is more compelling than they let on. That to you equals I am required to film the legendary animal personally? Does this strike you as a logical response?
Yeah, half the things they said would make it more convincing when playing the ape clips were actually in the Patterson film. Long limbs, flexing muscles in places that aren’t anatomically correct for humans. Not saying it’s real but if it’s a hoax it’s very impressive. They also say the gait looks human when it famously isn’t, any primate biologist will tell you that’s not a natural way for a human to walk. Again, not saying it’s real, but if it isn’t not, it’s a lucky or brilliant hoax, not an obvious one.
They didn't. They're college dudes. Likely drinking and laughing at these videos but have NO credentials. They're like food critics. Or movie critics. They're just commenting so people like YOU will watch and belive them. Again! Anyone can say anything! So be very skeptical or what people tell you! Becareful of anyone who says, "bigfoot is real!" AND becareful of people who say "bigfoot I'd NOT real!!!' Always be skeptical of rhe extremists!!! The middle way is the best way
There's been some interesting analysis of the Patterson/Gimlin film that purport to show the creature is outside human body shape in terms of length/proportions/movement of the body structures. Might deserve a deeper dive. 🤟✌
They already put Bob Heironimus side by side it is human shaped and it has his gait. They already explained that. It must have went right over your head.
@@USBionicMarine Whats goin over your head is you can clearly see muscle mass movement. Explain how that can happen from a suit . No man-made suit even came close to that in 1967.
You should make a challenge where everyone gets to create the most believable big foot sighting footage. The most believable one would be crowned the winner.
I don’t believe in Bigfoot. But I do want to argue Sams point about being too scared to film a Bigfoot. If people are too scared to film bears, then why do we have smartphone footage of random bear encounters in the wild? 🤔
The proportions and walking of a bi-pedal ape should be expected to be more similar to the other bi-pedal apes than it would be to the quadrupedal apes. We have shorter arms because we don't use them as legs. We have longer legs because we walk upright. The same would be true for bigfoots. If bigfoot is real as described by legend then it absolutely should look more like a human than it looks like a gorilla. Like they should compare to humans the same way that gorillas compare to chimps. A chimp in a gorilla suit would look way more like a gorilla than any human in a gorilla suit ever could.
The Pennsylvania Bigfoot video is one i would love you guys to look at, it's an articulating face and long arm movement, definitely a creative one y'all are asking for
The most compelling videos I’ve seen were one in Russia where the proportions were Gibbon like and the “Bigfoot” was leaping while running, and another where a figure single handed throws a tree like a spear.
In reference to sea monsters: its hard to imagine scarier animals than 23' Whites or crocs, not to mention giant squid. Authentic creatures are enough to amaze me.
The thing with the Paterson footage is if you get a clean copy you can see the muscles moving under the skin. We can do that today with costumes not in 1967. Also if they would take the time and measure the arms and legs are out of proportion to standard human anatomy. Not saying its real but I thought they'd take more time on it and put in the effort to properly address the footage. As my dad would say not mad just disappointed. :)
Thank you Corridor Crew!!! Huge fan here can't believe you did this! Totally made my day! 🤩 "Always believe in yourself, even when nobody else does" - bigfoot 👣😁
I know Adam Savage has done a few costumes with puppeted heads, like his bear costume. Maybe you could do another collab with him to make super realistic bigfoot footage
The most realistic/believable shot of a Bigfoot I ever saw was on the first episode of the Les Stroud show of him searching for Bigfoot. It had an actual face that moved and everything. Definitely check that one out.
Les Stroud is a great guy but films he got are made by Todd Standing, proven notorious hoaxer. Guy climbing up hill in this video is also filmed by Todd.
now that I'm seeing it enhanced, the first footage in the compilation that is the most recognizable just looks like some guy walking around in a gorilla suit.
You're doing important work. I wish we were all less susceptible to those superstitions, but since we're not, I'm glad you're educating us using your expertise
With concerns to the Patterson footage, it’s Been reviewed by both costume designers and biologists and both have said that what the corridor crew said is not possible
the muscle movement is human-like and it isn't impossible for a human to walk like that. but that being said, it isn't difficult for a human to replicate the gate of an ape. half of terry notary's career is the replication of apes. i think to come to a conclussion of wether or not the p/g footage is real or not kind of ruins the americana whimsy of it. i think people should just enjoy it for what it is, not what it might be.
How is it not possible tho? It moves like a human, they even found the dude who walked exactly the same way, and there have been much more impressive costumes in film. And its so blurry that you don't even get a good look at the costume.
@@LordWout It's certainly possible to mimic the walk, sure. Honestly though, why would anyone expect a bipedal ape to be notably taller than a human or walk in a substantially different manner? "Bipedal ape has similar height limitations and gait to other bipedal ape".
"What if it's not the photographer's fault? What if Bigfoot is just blurry? There could be a large, out-of-focus creature roaming the countryside." -- Mitch Hedberg.
One issue: Nico assumed the Patterson-Gimlin creature has "normal proportions." It does not. Anthropologists have measured the limb ratios and they don't match humans. Basically the arms are too long and the tibia is too short, and that is very hard to fake practically. You can easily make legs longer, but not shorter (we can't move our knees around). Another fact worth considering, it was shot at the very END of a reel of film. The first part was full of B-roll from them riding around the forest for days. Which means if you assume it's fake, they had ONE TAKE to get this footage. Consider the difficulty of getting a very large man and very advanced, expensive suit (for 1967) deep into the California wilderness, and then getting a perfect first take, no stumbles or slips of any kind in the bulky suit. I'm not convinced either way but it's interesting
It's a primate....doesn't mean sorta human. It's like they explained with the weight and build and everything different with a gorilla compared to a human
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
I would love to see a bigfoot challenge where you guys compete to make the most convincing bigfoot footage
That would be an awesome content to watch👍👌
Yes i wanted to see it, i was thinking about it whole time
😏 maybe CC not skilled enough to make a convicing bigfood...
There have to be some talented cosplay fans here who could help with the raw footage.
Guarantee this video is for testing the waters of this exact idea.
Yess, please
Bigfoot caught on tape challenge with the crew needs to happen. I want to see Niko and Sam's effect shots of a non-humananoid Bigfoot creature. Make it happen guys
Also let viewers make and submit one too.
Get Clint back in the Mocap suit
We need more videos like project loom
Maybe even broaden it to general cryptid footage
Bigfoot is humanoid by definition, not sure what you’re proposing.
The dude climbing the fence is hilarious.
He runs along slightly stooped over so no one can see him
I would absolutely love to watch them debunk sea monsters videos
Same.
I have a fear of this but, I would still force myself to watch it.
@@Dipvide Same, will watch it but for sure have a pillow to shield myself with
@@Dipvide The Ocean is the scariest place on earth
theres footage that went around around a marine biology boards back in like the early 2000's of an unknown sea animal, not a single scientist could identify it and the person that shot it and posted the footage was a marine biologist too. I beleive i saw the footage talked about on trey the explainer's page.
A lot of us would love to see this turned into a VFX challenge!
Totally agree
Yes, make the best Big Foot Fotage we ever seen!
@@Borni84 they wouldnt do shit cuz its real
@@Natty5D LOL you can tell by the look on the faces at the end that the Patterson film has them seriously thinking it might be a real creature
@@kerzytibok3211 Yeah and they called it a him even though she clearly has breasts, lol. If they didn't point out the breasts, then they barely analyzed these videos and only made assumptions.
Consider that the original Bigfoot video was captured in 1960s and makes me wonder that why it looks much more realistic than a Hollywood movie whether it’s a costume or Cgi
Time to do a fun challenge where you all try to come up with the best bigfoot shot that avoids low quality shaky camera
only if you're buying/renting the costumes
Release the videos anonymously over the next 6 months.. see if they convince millions
@@bbloomfield6497 I love it
Considering every action scene in american TV shows and films is made this same way, I'd say talk to one of those directors for tips on how to do it.
“I think Bigfoot is blurry, that's the problem. It's not the photographer's fault. Bigfoot is blurry, and that's extra scary to me. There's a large, out-of-focus monster roaming the countryside. ” - Mitch Hedberg
A humanoid displacer beast. Which also explains why nobody has landed a shot on one.
"It's coming right for us!"
Not only is bigfoot blurry but when bigfoot walks, every step it takes makes the earth shake which leads to shaky camera so before blaming the camera man, blame bigfoot.
@@chaoticneutral6288 a fantastic comedian, his style of comedy was telling one liners and short jokes like the Bigfoot one, he’s one of my favorites
@@chaoticneutral6288 A great and chill comedian
I want to see Corridor crew attempt to make a bigfoot footage that even Captain Disillusion couldn't debunk unless he watched the process video.
100% want to see you guys do a cryptozoology challenge. Whoever can make the most believable footage of a monster of their choosing.
Good idea
Ooh! Make it random! Like they gotta pull the name from a hat!
This is a cool idea!
Yesss
I second this ☝ Please do this 🙏
I would like to see you with Adam Savage trying to create the most realistic bigfoot tape
there would be someone not in on it who'll pass it off as real evidence haha
@@360.Tapestry Oh 100%. Even people who Know where it came from will go around posting it claiming it's real just for internet clout/attention/memes. Guarantee you it'll constantly get posted on places like tiktok where people pass it off as real just for views.
Man, that would be so cool. Adam with practical effects and corridor with the CGI.
The interesting part is that Adam and the Corridor guys would give it their best shot and still fall short of the '67 Patterson film --- then they would admit it's a real Bigfoot !!
I was thinking this and then I saw it. Maybe Corridor can create a frame by frame CGI recreation of the Paterson Film.
0:30 - You had the chance to call it "Bigfootage" and missed it...
This went from a debunk video to a “How to improve your fake big foot videos” video. I love it!
They were just so disappointed at the quality they were presented with, it was barely an effort for them. At least some of the ufo and ghost videos presented some sort of challenge.
Bigfoot challenge incoming
@@Hawk_of_Battle yeah except they were looking at the Patterson film at the end and mostly convinced it's a real Bigfoot
@@kerzytibok3211 they found that original footage the most convincing compared to everything else. That’s a very different thing from being mostly convinced it’s real.
Ya u just gotta get your shins cut, steal the fat suit from the big momma movies, stop by the planet of the apes set, learn how to rock down to electric boogorilladoo.
Then you just challenge your camera guy shots, because your gonna look so real he might try to shoot you without the camera!
I laughed when you mentioned adding weight to things when filming because one thing my fiancé and I always call out in movies or shows are people carrying coffee cups that are CLEARLY empty…it’s so obvious, like just put water or something in them! Lol
One trick is to use jello!! Mix up jello in a cup. It solidifies and wont spill or splash around but it still has the same weight as if it were coffee !!
Safer to use on set because less likely to spill on equipment or costumes
My pet peeve is actors carrying ”babies” that are clearly dolls with no weight.
Remember at end of "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly" how heavy the sacks of gold coins actually were? One can see Eastwood struggling some to lift them onto the horse, and the horse reacting to all that weight. Sure, likely were rocks or sand in those sacks, but one can easily see that they were quite heavy.
This makes me really want to make my own Big Footage! Also that guy hopping over the fence was absolutely hilarious 😂
I know I’m not the first to suggest this but Corridor should definitely attempt to make the most convincing Bigfoot footage with practical and visual effects. Now whether the attempt is released anonymously or not is another thing to think about
Your definitely not the first.
Your like the 20th
Anonymously. Cuz it'll give it time to see how easily the popular opinion is convinced
if i had that kind of VFX knowledge and skill i would definitely make videos like that and upload them on a throwaway reddit account just to mess with people
This is actually a terrible idea for anyone invested in keeping Sasquatch as a joke or myth. What would happen is they would try to do their own fakery it would immediately be torn apart by experts all the while giving the PG footage more validity. It’s like the pyramids we couldn’t replicate it if we tried.
These guys don't work in practical effects or costumes so it's outside their skillset to try and recreate that.
I want to see a "Can the Debunkers be Debunked" series. Let Sam and Niko create some footage and do their SFX magic without anyone else at CC knowing. Then have the footage sent anonymously to Corridor. It doesn't have to be bigfoot either- well I want like 5 or 6 of these, so Bigfoot at some point.
this is a great idea
I live in Australia and I've lived in the bush for 30 years. 10 years ago when I went for a walk I saw a bigfoot walk across the trail I was on. It was 9 or 10ft tall. It looked at me as it stepped across the trail and it just kept walking through. I shit myself then turned around and walked home. After my experience I looked into the subject and I realised there were thousands of sightings all around the world. I came to the conclusion that every single person is lying or there is actually something out there. I don't believe that thousands of people around the world are lying.
Good idea
@@lachie4017 maybe it's not a bigfoot. Perhaps something far more mysterious
@Abaseen-خان💜 nah what I saw was 100% a sasquatch
You guys are so good at your job, you didn't even notice the breasts swinging on the Patterson/Gimlin film, great observation skills huh.
after all these critiques, you guys should totally make the best Bigfoot footage you can, filmed as practically as you can, and make a video about it
Mic Dodge, a famous woodsman in Washington state, is known for dressing up in a homemade beaver pelt bigfoot costume and trolling bigfoot hunters in the forests up there. He's been doing it for decades. The Discovery channel had a series about him for a while and they filmed him doing it one night. The hoots and howls he would do are almost a perfect match for some the so-called bigfoot recordings. He took trolling to a whole new level.
and hes now dead, because americans shot him. xd
@jbholland1987 Is he actually?
First thing I thought what he's probably dead hah
Sounds so dangerous. Looking him up, I don't think he needs a costume either.
Do you know what the series was called? That sounds kind-of amazing, lol
Are there people doing the same in the nahanni valley, Northwest Territories? Are they taking people and carrying them up a 1000 ft rock face? People, children, have been found in these impossible to reach places.
Lol "come with me out into the field and I will show you a sasquatch".
Corridor should make their own convincing version of all of these.
i thought they would the first time they did bigfoot!
Yes!!
@@cindyespindola4946 Maybe they've already did, we just don't know which one is it
I’m still waiting for the Corridor Digital moon landing
I'm disappointed in the 2nd clip. They were just like: costume. That's it. Nothing about the height, nothing about the sound, nothing about the tearing apart the tree with it's bare hands...nothing... vs the first one, they had various examples and cgi work done to debunk it.
Fun fact, the Patterson film is the single most analyzed piece of footage ever filmed, with the exception of the Zapruder film of the Kennedy assassination.
Yes, analyzed, but never successfully debunked by anyone (including this video)
Edit: I find it problematic that the Patterson-Gimlin film has been SO excessively analyzed and yet not explained away, and yet videos like hyper-simplistic, even dismissive reviews such as this one by the Corridor Crew can be accepted outright. The outcome is not educational nor is it scientific.
Basically made this comment in more length earlier, but you couldn’t even make a skin tight “ape suit” on your own in 1967, and NO one made something like that, that you could just go buy.
@@hamilcar682 Precisely. Though the mastermind behind the costuming for the original Planet of the Apes film was credited by many in Hollywood for making the “ape suit” in the Patterson-Gimlin film, he himself never actually said that he made it. Loren Coleman’s discussion of the history behind all this was I think eye-opening and nuanced.
So glad that people like you are making comments on these kinds of RUclips videos. I was displeased to see so many comments supporting the video uncritically.
They already debunked the Paterson film. No reason to go any farther.
@@USBionicMarine ummm who is “They”
What impresses me most about the Patterson footage is that all the attempts to re-create it have looked SO BAD. If it's fake, Patterson and Gimlin were better special effects men than anyone who has made a Bigfoot-related Hollywood movie. IMO Jurassic Park was the point at which movie effects caught up.
Regarding the gait, the late physical anthropologist Grover Krantz identified some really significant differences with humans. For example, most humans spend 95% of their walking stride with one foot or the other on the ground; Patty has both feet on the ground for 20% of the stride. Humans tend to fully lock their knees at certain points, whereas Patty's knees are notably bent at all times. Closest parallel I can think of is the way SWAT teams move when they're trying not to make audible footsteps. It's not an impossible gait for a human, but it's not the default one either by any means. If you walk like that on the sidewalk you'll look WEIRD.
I'm glad you guys brought up Planet of the Apes, because the head costume designer for that movie said he and his team would not be able to produce the Patterson footage. In particular he cited the movement of muscles under the fur, which get hidden by a suit. He said the hoax would require a person of that build, with fur glued to his body.
And as far as the dude who claimed to be in the suit? There have been like 6 guys who took credit for that. It's a really quick and easy way to get yourself on the local news.
Yup. There have been a few clowns who claimed to have been the guy in the suit. They couldn’t even take anyone to the filming location.
What stumps me about the film is this: let’s say it was a hoax. Let’s say a couple of nearly broke rodeo cowboys came up with a suit, in 1967, that was decades ahead of what the best Hollywood artists could make. And they made the suit a female with large breasts-because, hey, why not make it more complicated than it needed to be? Then they travel deep into the woods on horseback with their accomplice (again, no credible one has ever come forward)… and then shoot just a few seconds of shaky footage. It kind of beggars belief. If they were able to make a costume that good, they could have made far more money in the movie business than they ever did off the supposed hoax. And if someone else made it? No one has ever come forward with a convincing example of the costume.
For me it’s easier to believe that Bigfoot exists and Patterson and Gimlin happened to catch a few seconds of shaky footage of one than to believe the preposterous things I’d have to believe to think it was a hoax.
So you find it more believable that a creature could survive for hundreds of thousands of years in almost complete secrecy, with no one EVER finding a dead one or providing any convincing evidence in the year 2024, than some guys being able to rig a Bigfoot costume in the 1960s? Yeah okay.
Besides that, John Landis said the costume was created by professional special effects people to fool Patterson. No one has ever accused Patterson of faking the costume himself.
Bigfoot believers are no different than Loch Ness Monster hunters or the UFO community. No one ever has any convincing evidence. Just decade after decade of blurry, shaky footage and "I saw something or know a guy who saw something".
And to add one more fun detail: I would point to the head as being the most difficult part of this costume to replicate. If you look closely at it, you notice that the head doesn't have human proportions. In fact, the forehead looks like it gets smaller up top, which is impossible for costumes to do. Especially back then. Costumes can only add, they can't subtract.
Omg. This would be easy to take. Is has been reproduced by the BBC. They just showed somebody (Bob Heronimus) with the same stride!
@@andrewreid4320The level of logic, or lack thereof, you display here just explains everything one needs to know about Bigfoot.
This is officially one of the best series on RUclips now.
true
Yeppers! Best ever food reviews is one of the best as well! What others are there? Idk much 😂
No
sooo true :)
Should be nice to see you debunk "Flat earthers" and show how a sunset should look like on a flat earth (if it sets).
I like how Nico described the exact techniques used in Harry and The Hendersons. Would be a good idea to do a react to that movie and other animatics.
movie? wasn't that a tv show?
I still remember that shot of Harry in the sunlight getting hit by the car at the start of the movie really freaking me out was a kid lol.
@@LuisSierra42 It was a movie first; then a television series was adapted from it.
@@LuisSierra42 It was a movie first, but they turned it into tv show because it was so popular.
I had the same thought. I hope @CorridorCrew reacts to the Harry and The Hendersons movie. Great idea to look at animatics too!
Explaining how body proportions, gait, inertia, and environmental adaptation all play a role in how a creature walks was legitimately fascinating. I never thought to debunk Bigfoot clips in that way.
A debunk on sea creatures and a studio contest to see the best Bigfoot footage would be great!
Yes to them both!
"Why hasn't anyone shot one?" Sam never disappoints!
A few thoughts: it's not that common to shoot a large animal and have it drop dead on the spot. Even a good lung shot often sees the animal run some distance before it collapses. Then you would have to track its blood trail to find it. And finding anything dead that is camouflaged for its environment can be very difficult. Having listened to a lot of alleged first hand accounts from hunters on Sasquatch Chronicles, I can offer a few more possible insights- 1) many witnesses say that resemble humans to an extent where it gives them pause before firing. Is it a guy in a suit? Is it a prank? It's said their eyes look very human-like. 2) Most hunters are hunting deer and aren't carrying serious firepower. If you have an ~8ft. creature and you have .270winchester rifle or even a .44mag sidearm, you don't really have stopping power for that animal. 3) There is a theory that they have the ability to emit infrasound capable of subduing humans. Many alleged witnesses claim that their roar freezes you, blanks your mind or otherwise effects the nervous system so that you can't act. Many also say they are left with a residual malaise or morbidity often for several days after that may be an after effect of infrasonic attack.
Yes try to shoot a 800 plus pound ape like creature and try to survive or catch it before it runs off see how well that works for ya.
@@evan_stadler dude, good elk bull doesn’t weigh much less than that. A good moose will be 1000 plus, you can definetely shoot something that big and have a reasonable chance of it collapsing instantly. People absolutely would’ve shot at least one by now.
@@evan_stadler If we can hunt whales, we can shoot a bigfoot.
@@shmekelfreckles8157 yes but it's believed by many that there's typically more than just the one you see so if that's true who knows how many of the 1000s of peaple that go missing every year did shoot and maybe kill one but didn't live to tell the tail since they didn't realize they were out numbered. I'm not saying these things are 100% real but the amount of evidence there is you can't just say "well we haven't killed one so can't be real" that's super arrogant. Not to mention the countless peaple who have seen these things and have permanently changed by the experience. Just open your eyes a little do some research before making bold and arrogant decisions.
To me what immediately indicates the Patterson Footage is fake is the glutes are stiff and don't flex as the "Creature" walks. Seems like the guy was wearing some armor that ends by the butt line under the furry suit.
Now I just want corridor to make a fake bigfoot shot just to show us how real it could look when experts do it
It would still look fake
well there is the sonoma one, v=yiiICn-wTQA, that Penn & Teller did and released in the wild in secret to rile up the bog foot people.
@@Joe-ji9wk Still probably more convincing than all these so called videos of Bigfoot.
It would be cool if they compete with each other to make the more realistic bigfoot video
People would just share it as proof without context, same as with the Bosstown Dynamics videos lol
I love that this is a video basically informing people how to make better Bigfoot footage and I love it! I really hope we get some better stuff out there. AND YES PLEASE DO water creatures! they're creepy AF
better videos? wtf this people actually think that u just ge out u phone and as fast u get a foot on video? even get a bear on video on the wilderness is not that commun get a foot is 1 in a million
My IQ has gone down trying to read your comment 😂
@@CATSWITHKYLA sorry inglish in not my native language
@@Mrpizzas664 I kinda thought that. Just so you know you said beer🍺 which is a drink and I think you meant deer, the animal 🦌 in case you want to edit it!!
@@CATSWITHKYLA yes i know xD beer or cerveza here in mexico i get it ! i mean bear that means oso
11:45 “I think someone’s 4 or 5 year old is in a tinier guerrilla costume.” 😂 this had me cracking up
To debunk that people would be afraid to be that close, you should watch some footage of all the people that get too close to Bison and any other animal at Yellowstone. While most people have common sense there are a lot that don't
Fan fact: any time you see an animal with "reverse knees," there's like a 95% chance you're just looking at its ankles.
yeah it's called digitigrade walking
100%
@@chaoticneutral6288 lol
Honestly compared to pretty much every other animal, human walking is weird af, we have weird extended heels which WALK ON instead of toes
In 1976, I attended a lecture by a man named Bob Hieronimous on the history of the Great Seal of the U.S. Many years later, he claimed he was the person wearing the saquatch suit in that first video. He said a friend hired him to play the role but never paid him. You can look him up and read his version of the story.
His story is full of holes. He didn't have a similar gait, didn't have similar proportions and the guy that "offered him 1k" was a retired rodeo showman that was so poor he was taking out loans to pay his bills.
@@kalcosin8994He burnt the Sasquatch costumes. It was him.
You guys should absolutely debunk sea monsters.
You should also absolutely try and make your own digital bigfoot videos!!
I agree, sea monsters are real once you look at the actual species that live on the depths.
You guys need to make some convincing bigfoot sighted footage using your proper vfx and filmmaking knowledge, I'd love to see that happen
you didn't debunk anything on the Patterson film, you just made jokes.
I don't think you were listening very carefully. Try again :)
All fakes, people will believe anything 🤔
There's video on the costume shown.
They're just pointing out the obvious!
@@reaceness They failed miserably at "debunking" the video.
I'd love to see Corridor try to make a convincing monster footage as part of these videos. Or maybe it could be a whole new series.
Now I wanna see a vfx challenge of who can make the most convincing bigfoot footage
CGI guys- Suit looks great.
Stan Winston and Rick Baker...the 2 best to ever creature effects guys. Winston- "It's a guy in a bad hair suit" Baker- "It looked like cheap fake fur"
I would LOVE a sea monster debunking episode!
I'd love if two of the guys secretly made their own footage (practical or CGI) and sneak it into their compilation. Then they pretend they believe it and see what the third guy says!
Nice profile pic
Easy pick, though-- the believable one is the CC one
I just want to say that this show has helped me a lot with understanding movies better. I'm young, and I normally just enjoy the movie because it is a fun movie, but now after watching all of your videos, I have a new perspective on the movies I watch. Thank you
I just use these so when I watch scary videos, I know it's not real.
Be careful! Anyone can say ANYTHING! Just as much as these guys claiming that they're able to detect a costume when they clearly can't. Sorry, but I trust an expert with a PhD who said the original film could not be a costume with VERY good reasoning for why over these college dudes, sitting and chillin, mocking, and who have NEVER EVER left the comfort of their indoor plumbing and delivery pizza. Probably drunk and drinking while filling this?! Be more skeptical just as much as these guys are skeptical. They're simply incorrect about SOME of their criticisms and they are legit in others. But remember, ANYONE can say ANYTHING! just like me! So becareful of what you believe.
Jees. I just wanted to say that I like their vids.
@@fuzyfuzfuz2 it's not that deep 😭
Also, I'm pretty sure they're certified in VFX mean they can easily detect when something is edited.
@@paxonm3281ignore them.
Honestly, some of the best Bigfoot videos are the Messing With Sasquatch commercials for beef jerky.
I love the idea of CC looking at Ocean creatures, maybe a team up with Casual Geographic? He's covered a bunch of the weirdest deep sea ocean dwellers
But why? Guy makes the most incredible basic low effort stuff. Basically everything Corridor doesn´t do.
@@DerAykac I'm a sucker for crossovers of people I follow
Wren set back on the couch is creating a Frodo/Gandalf wagon-ride situation at 2:45
Harry and the Hendersons probably deserves a brief mention since they did such a convincing job with practical effects over 3 decades ago.
@Rhizosphere Well i don't see why it wouldn't
Convincing to whom?
I would have liked if they had shown why they felt Patty was a costume. I was looking forward to seeing an in depth analysis.
I second you on that. As would I. Unfortunately, their reasoning was quite paltry.
Yeah me too, this was lame.
@@dsbmitchell One reason is that Patterson wrote a book called Do abominable snowman of North America exist??? He drew Patty in it with breast and all.....Two years before he flim her?
@@elsapoelsapo1821 Thanks for your comment. Yes, I am aware of that. While I can understand some people using this as cause for concern, it doesn’t particularly bother me. Researchers and scientists generate hypotheses all the time that they will find such and such data to support this or that theory, and quite often they actually end up turning up just such evidence that goes against a null hypothesis. As a scientist myself, I am well aware of this. I don’t see much difference in what happened with the Patterson film.
Moreover, if these hairy hominids exist, compose a breeding population, and one of them was captured on film, there is more than a small likelihood that the subject filmed would be a female since females as well as males are in fact needed to sustain such a breeding population.
In all, I see no problem with the fact that the subject was a female or bore similarity to some of Patterson’s previous work (which was itself similar to another popular reported sighting). I think interested investigators should focus on the subject in the film itself (its anatomy, biomechanics, etc.) rather than the person behind the film, and allow that evidence to speak for itself.
Edit/Update: I now have a copy of Patterson’s book, and the majority of the drawings in the book are of male Sasquatch-not female ones. So there does not seem to be any indication that he had some sort of pre-conceived plan to specifically film a female Sasquatch.
@@dsbmitchell Most people don't know the background of the hoax. Roger was making a movie, where he and his bigfoot buddies were going to hunt down bigfoot. Bob Heironimus and his brother Howard starred in it too, along with Bob Gimlin as an Indian tracker. Roger ended up dumping the project as he couldn't get the further funding from his wealthy brother in law Al DeAtley so he sold the film as a real life encounter instead. Roger's co-worker Janos Prohaska, in working with ANE built the costume. The head piece used was a taurean head created by Wah Chang. It was common practice, and still is, to put together parts of different costumes to make "new" ones.
Bigfoot believers say that “it’s impossible to walk bending your knees at an almost 90 degrees angle” and yet the guy in the stock footage next to Patty perfectly does it lol
You guys HAVE to turn this into a challenge video! Would love to see you guys recreate this kind of stuff
We already know Sam will make a whole game out of that challenge.
I could be wrong but the left footage at 6:19 looks like it could be their studio, meaning they have a Bigfoot suit and might be filming something like this soon
The BBC tried it with the Paterson/Gimlin film , but they failed, and that was more than 50 years after the fact.
I want to see the corridor crew make their own cryptid footage with their own original monster! Though it would need a big watermark in the corner saying "THIS IS FAKE" or else it would be shared a million times on facebook lol
also deep sea creature episode yes!
Could you imagine being the person that has to report on live television of an obviously fake "big foot" sighting video.
Sometimes they do roll those out for April 1st.
8:15
"You wouldn't be able to hear a gian-Oh my god that is a guy."
4:10 lmao it even looks like the person is wearing a backpack and headphones if you look close enough
It would be such a cool challenge for yall to make your own cgi cryptid footage and compete to see who can make it the most realistic
Right at the end, Sam said exactly what I was about to comment. The old OG footage looks more convincing than anything else that has ever been presented as a Bigfoot on camera. Nothing even comes close, and that's so disappointing. I'm not saying 100% that it's an impossibility that there could be something out there, but no video has ever come close to convincing me. The most realistic Bigfoot that's ever been filmed is Hary from Hary and the Hendersons. That costume was some of Stan Winston's best work. The hair and the expressive face were amazingly well done and very natural looking. I honestly don't think anybody will ever get as good as that.
Can't wait to see the oceanic cryptid debunk video.
The Corridor guys didn't want to admit it in this video --- but the way they were looking at the Patterson film at the end convinces them it's not a hoax but a real creature!
@@kerzytibok3211
🐴💩 Pull the other one. 🙄
Here's a fun fact that I don't get to share often, but figured it would be fitting to share here tho, my dad knew the guy in the gorilla suit in the first clip( 1:05 ). My dad even took me to where it was taken too.
When the Patterson film was the first to pop up, it was a bit disappointing that they didn’t look into it as far as other researchers have. Being such an old video and considered the best, it’s been used and looked at a lot.
Yea and they said the proportions were human when there clearly not. Aswell as they just keep saying it's a guy in a suit for like every video. Disappointed in this video as well
@@evan_stadler ya there's muscle movement under the fur, it's clearly female which is an odd choice for a costume and it's gait is not human. They can't make that as a costume right now let alone back then. Those planet of the apes costume look goofy in comparison. The guy who claimed he faked it had no proof, it was simply his word. This was a lazy effort to debunk and I honestly expected better.
@@Pj-fm7oe 100%
@@Pj-fm7oe Well if bigfoot is so real why don't you just go and film him/her yourself?
@@XxDemon23xX
Did I say it was real? I laid out reasons that the footage is more compelling than they let on. That to you equals I am required to film the legendary animal personally? Does this strike you as a logical response?
You guys should compete to see who can make the most realistic bigfoot footage
The best bigfoot footage would be Tom Cruise running fast in a tiny bigfoot costume
I would love for u guys to make something like that. A „fake bigfoot sighting“. Could be interesting. :]
Interesting to see if you can muscle "rig" the Patterson film , including the right leg muscle quiver as it walks , like the gorilla clip you included
Yeah, half the things they said would make it more convincing when playing the ape clips were actually in the Patterson film. Long limbs, flexing muscles in places that aren’t anatomically correct for humans. Not saying it’s real but if it’s a hoax it’s very impressive.
They also say the gait looks human when it famously isn’t, any primate biologist will tell you that’s not a natural way for a human to walk. Again, not saying it’s real, but if it isn’t not, it’s a lucky or brilliant hoax, not an obvious one.
Plus the Bigfoot has boozies, a female Bigfoot
@@ModernEphemera the human they show after walks exactly the same. Were you even watching the video? And those boots you can see on the legs.
It is evidently costume, because you cant see muscle movement.
@@jaroslavpesek6642 what? Watch the right leg when it lands
I appreciate y'all stabilising the footage in the close ups!
Those are available online, they didn't do that.
They didn't. They're college dudes. Likely drinking and laughing at these videos but have NO credentials. They're like food critics. Or movie critics. They're just commenting so people like YOU will watch and belive them. Again! Anyone can say anything! So be very skeptical or what people tell you! Becareful of anyone who says, "bigfoot is real!" AND becareful of people who say "bigfoot I'd NOT real!!!' Always be skeptical of rhe extremists!!! The middle way is the best way
There's been some interesting analysis of the Patterson/Gimlin film that purport to show the creature is outside human body shape in terms of length/proportions/movement of the body structures.
Might deserve a deeper dive. 🤟✌
ABSOLUTELY deserves a deeper dive. Thanks for this post!
@@dsbmitchell ,
You betcha! 👍
@@Darmesis Right on! 😄
They already put Bob Heironimus side by side it is human shaped and it has his gait. They already explained that. It must have went right over your head.
@@USBionicMarine Whats goin over your head is you can clearly see muscle mass movement. Explain how that can happen from a suit . No man-made suit even came close to that in 1967.
You should make a challenge where everyone gets to create the most believable big foot sighting footage.
The most believable one would be crowned the winner.
I don’t believe in Bigfoot. But I do want to argue Sams point about being too scared to film a Bigfoot. If people are too scared to film bears, then why do we have smartphone footage of random bear encounters in the wild? 🤔
You should each do your own bigfoot sighting video, and each pick a different news station to see if you can get one to report on it.
You guys should produce your own "bigfoot footage" and release it to the internet wilds. Then post a video about the process and reception!
I love those t-shirts that say something along the lines of: "Bigfoot, Hide and Seek Champion"
This series is so entertaining. Hopefully we get a Loch Ness episode too
yes please. and also a preview of CGI Loch Ness. thanks
you guys should do your own bigfoot video, to school all these amateurs
If I were to make a bigfoot video, I would slip a bigfoot costume on a sleeping gorilla and wait with a 4K camera for him to wake up.
We have to remember that they are just VFX artists and they talked very little about that in this video
The proportions and walking of a bi-pedal ape should be expected to be more similar to the other bi-pedal apes than it would be to the quadrupedal apes. We have shorter arms because we don't use them as legs. We have longer legs because we walk upright. The same would be true for bigfoots.
If bigfoot is real as described by legend then it absolutely should look more like a human than it looks like a gorilla. Like they should compare to humans the same way that gorillas compare to chimps. A chimp in a gorilla suit would look way more like a gorilla than any human in a gorilla suit ever could.
The Pennsylvania Bigfoot video is one i would love you guys to look at, it's an articulating face and long arm movement, definitely a creative one y'all are asking for
I would adore a video of u guys explaining and debunking deep sea clips
The most compelling videos I’ve seen were one in Russia where the proportions were Gibbon like and the “Bigfoot” was leaping while running, and another where a figure single handed throws a tree like a spear.
More of a sapling than a tree. Bigfoot exists though.
Scots can throw even bigger logs.
Yeah right
In reference to sea monsters: its hard to imagine scarier animals than 23' Whites or crocs, not to mention giant squid. Authentic creatures are enough to amaze me.
The thing with the Paterson footage is if you get a clean copy you can see the muscles moving under the skin. We can do that today with costumes not in 1967. Also if they would take the time and measure the arms and legs are out of proportion to standard human anatomy. Not saying its real but I thought they'd take more time on it and put in the effort to properly address the footage. As my dad would say not mad just disappointed. :)
Thank you Corridor Crew!!! Huge fan here can't believe you did this! Totally made my day! 🤩
"Always believe in yourself, even when nobody else does" - bigfoot 👣😁
🎉🎉
If you did a sea monster debunk. It would be one of your best debunk episodes.
Your debucking videos are the best. They're my favorite videos of this channel.
I would love to see Corridor try to make a “real” Bigfoot video!!
"Oh my gosh that's human!" How can I take your channel seriously when you have BIGFOOT trying to debunk bigfoot?
I would love for these debunking episodes, you guys would make your own fakes, that would be cool.
Another debunking video!! Let's gooooo !!
I know Adam Savage has done a few costumes with puppeted heads, like his bear costume. Maybe you could do another collab with him to make super realistic bigfoot footage
The most realistic/believable shot of a Bigfoot I ever saw was on the first episode of the Les Stroud show of him searching for Bigfoot. It had an actual face that moved and everything. Definitely check that one out.
I love that series because Les Stroud is first and foremost a wilderness survival expert.
Les Stroud is a great guy but films he got are made by Todd Standing, proven notorious hoaxer. Guy climbing up hill in this video is also filmed by Todd.
Corridor should make a legitimately convincing bigfoot sighting
Was that Nick under the costume? His "Guess what" at 13:50 sounded a lot like his~ 🎶🤔🐺
Three guys with common sense.
now that I'm seeing it enhanced, the first footage in the compilation that is the most recognizable just looks like some guy walking around in a gorilla suit.
There were no Gorilla suits good enough for that era.
13:07 I guess you really gotta believe the cameraman never dies
You're doing important work. I wish we were all less susceptible to those superstitions, but since we're not, I'm glad you're educating us using your expertise
@@chaoticneutral6288 I didn't mean to say that. ;)
With concerns to the Patterson footage, it’s Been reviewed by both costume designers and biologists and both have said that what the corridor crew said is not possible
Yep over and over again
the muscle movement is human-like and it isn't impossible for a human to walk like that. but that being said, it isn't difficult for a human to replicate the gate of an ape. half of terry notary's career is the replication of apes.
i think to come to a conclussion of wether or not the p/g footage is real or not kind of ruins the americana whimsy of it. i think people should just enjoy it for what it is, not what it might be.
How is it not possible tho? It moves like a human, they even found the dude who walked exactly the same way, and there have been much more impressive costumes in film. And its so blurry that you don't even get a good look at the costume.
@@LordWout It's certainly possible to mimic the walk, sure. Honestly though, why would anyone expect a bipedal ape to be notably taller than a human or walk in a substantially different manner? "Bipedal ape has similar height limitations and gait to other bipedal ape".
@LordWout He was one of several people to claim they were in the suit but could never produce the suit or even accurately describe it.
"What if it's not the photographer's fault? What if Bigfoot is just blurry? There could be a large, out-of-focus creature roaming the countryside." -- Mitch Hedberg.
One issue: Nico assumed the Patterson-Gimlin creature has "normal proportions." It does not. Anthropologists have measured the limb ratios and they don't match humans. Basically the arms are too long and the tibia is too short, and that is very hard to fake practically. You can easily make legs longer, but not shorter (we can't move our knees around). Another fact worth considering, it was shot at the very END of a reel of film. The first part was full of B-roll from them riding around the forest for days. Which means if you assume it's fake, they had ONE TAKE to get this footage. Consider the difficulty of getting a very large man and very advanced, expensive suit (for 1967) deep into the California wilderness, and then getting a perfect first take, no stumbles or slips of any kind in the bulky suit. I'm not convinced either way but it's interesting
But isn't bigfoot meant to be "sorta human"? It'd have to be pretty human-like in walk and build
It's a primate....doesn't mean sorta human. It's like they explained with the weight and build and everything different with a gorilla compared to a human