இது போல அமைதியாக ஆழமான கேள்விகளை முன் வைத்த ஒரு வித்தியாசமான நெறியாளரைப் பார்த்து வெகு நாளாகி விட்டது!பாராட்டுகள்! "மூத்த " பத்திரிகையாளர்கள் எல்லோருக்கும் ராஜகுருவாக இருக்க வேண்டும் என்ற ஆசை மேலோங்கி இருப்பதை புரிய வைத்த பேட்டி!
🇮🇳👍🇮🇳VERY TRUTHFUL, INTERESTING QUESTIONS & ANSWERS BY BOTH PARTIES, RESPECTING EACH OTHERS SPACE. LOVE THE QUESTIONS, TOTALLY HONEST ANSWERS BY THUGHLAK RAMESH SIR. ADMIRE BOTH PERSONS ATTITUDE 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾VANDE MATHARAM 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Hi Sir. JJ death date is 5-Dec-2016 and Cho Sir death is on 7-Dec-2016 ...Whole state was busy with JJ death, which silenced the death of Cho sir and went unnoticed.. since then I sense a foul play in Cho Sir's death.. whats your view on this.. Everyone knows JJ respects Cho sir a lot.
Jaylalithaa was, in her day, as corrupt as it could get then. I lost my respect for Cho, not merely because he supported J during her latter days but also started justifying her actions. His lame explanation was that the alternative, viz., the DMK, was far worse. Thuglak Ramesh's worshipping of J is no different, completely sidestepping her corrupt ways. This is ironical especially when Thuglak's reputation is it fight against corruption. BTW, while MGR may not have been personally corrupt, he turned a complete blind eye to the corruption in govt offices, especially during his second term. These are the heroes of Ramesh 🤣 The Viswharoopam film incident shows that Ramesh does not have even a basic understanding of the law. A film that had been cleared by censors *was being held to ransom by the street veto power of the peacefuls* . Any govt worth its salt would have stood its ground against such naked threat of violence, and even considered calling the army if the situation warranted it. Instead J's stance was purely political: meeting the peacefuls' threat of violence with a show of (justified) force would mean losing their votes completely. Since no politician would want that, J rationalized her stance by stating that the State was incapable of providing security for each and every theatre! "It is a problem between two parties and it is for them to sort out this issue between themselves" is a shocking argument in the face of a law and order threat. That a politician like J would spout it is one thing, but for a person like Ramesh to find it reasonable shows his complete lack of understanding of the principles of justice. Even worse, he feels proud about his role in the matter and never fails to mention it as a quotable incident in his life. BTW, had the film been unacceptable to a section of Hindus and threatened violence, the police would have acted with ferocity and arrested the concerned persons. J wouldn't have complained about lack of enough police force to protect each and every cinema hall. She wouldn't have said that this is an issue between two parties who need to sort it out between themselves.
She was one of the most unscrupulous politicians, ready to do anything for power. She didn't deserve the respect she had. I too differ with cho and ramesh on their stance, but I don't suspect their intentions. At one stage, cho accepted that he had gone little far than necessary in supporting J to the core.
இது போல அமைதியாக ஆழமான கேள்விகளை முன் வைத்த ஒரு வித்தியாசமான நெறியாளரைப் பார்த்து வெகு நாளாகி விட்டது!பாராட்டுகள்! "மூத்த " பத்திரிகையாளர்கள்
எல்லோருக்கும் ராஜகுருவாக இருக்க வேண்டும் என்ற ஆசை மேலோங்கி இருப்பதை புரிய வைத்த பேட்டி!
மிகவும் அருமையான ஆழமான எதார்த்தமான பதிவு
வாழ்த்துக்கள் ஜி
துக்ளக் ரமேஷின் பேட்டி மிகவும் இனிமையாக இருக்கிறது . அனுபவப்பொழிவு . நன்றி.
Good interview with Mr Ramesh..
அருமையான தெளிவான பதிவு சார்
அருமையாக உரையாடல் நடத்திய தம்பி உங்களுக்கு பாராட்டுக்கள். திரு ரமேஷ் அவர்கள் பல விவரங்கள் கூற வைத்ததற்கு நன்றி.
Great journalist under great magazine undev grt person CHO sir
❤ மிகவும் தேவையான தெளிவான தரமான நேர்காணல் ❤ சிறப்பு வாழ்த்துக்கள் ❤
🙏🏻
படியில் குணத்தவர் இரமேஷ்🙏 ராஜவேல் அவர்களுக்கு நன்றி
Such a respectful person. Example of ethics in journalism.
diravida thiruvalluvar padam etharkku
🇮🇳👍🇮🇳VERY TRUTHFUL, INTERESTING QUESTIONS & ANSWERS BY BOTH PARTIES, RESPECTING EACH OTHERS SPACE. LOVE THE QUESTIONS, TOTALLY HONEST ANSWERS BY THUGHLAK RAMESH SIR. ADMIRE BOTH PERSONS ATTITUDE 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾VANDE MATHARAM 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
அருமை ❤❤❤
Super interview 🎉
சூப்ப்ர் சார்
A request to PTP team : Please change the white Thiruvalluvar photo to 'kaavi' Thiruvalluvar.
மிக சிறப்பான பேட்டி
nice podcast.
Good program by PTP .
I love BJP
Sir , Please Change the " Photo " of Shri. Thiru Valluvar . Kindly replace with Actual & Original one . Jai Jai Hind . Jai Tamil Nadu .
அண்ணாமலை வாழ்க ❤❤❤❤ அண்ணாமலை
Hi Sir. JJ death date is 5-Dec-2016 and Cho Sir death is on 7-Dec-2016 ...Whole state was busy with JJ death, which silenced the death of Cho sir and went unnoticed.. since then I sense a foul play in Cho Sir's death.. whats your view on this.. Everyone knows JJ respects Cho sir a lot.
சண்டாளன் கருணாநிதி
Jaylalithaa was, in her day, as corrupt as it could get then. I lost my respect for Cho, not merely because he supported J during her latter days but also started justifying her actions. His lame explanation was that the alternative, viz., the DMK, was far worse. Thuglak Ramesh's worshipping of J is no different, completely sidestepping her corrupt ways. This is ironical especially when Thuglak's reputation is it fight against corruption. BTW, while MGR may not have been personally corrupt, he turned a complete blind eye to the corruption in govt offices, especially during his second term. These are the heroes of Ramesh 🤣
The Viswharoopam film incident shows that Ramesh does not have even a basic understanding of the law. A film that had been cleared by censors *was being held to ransom by the street veto power of the peacefuls* . Any govt worth its salt would have stood its ground against such naked threat of violence, and even considered calling the army if the situation warranted it. Instead J's stance was purely political: meeting the peacefuls' threat of violence with a show of (justified) force would mean losing their votes completely. Since no politician would want that, J rationalized her stance by stating that the State was incapable of providing security for each and every theatre! "It is a problem between two parties and it is for them to sort out this issue between themselves" is a shocking argument in the face of a law and order threat. That a politician like J would spout it is one thing, but for a person like Ramesh to find it reasonable shows his complete lack of understanding of the principles of justice. Even worse, he feels proud about his role in the matter and never fails to mention it as a quotable incident in his life.
BTW, had the film been unacceptable to a section of Hindus and threatened violence, the police would have acted with ferocity and arrested the concerned persons. J wouldn't have complained about lack of enough police force to protect each and every cinema hall. She wouldn't have said that this is an issue between two parties who need to sort it out between themselves.
She was one of the most unscrupulous politicians, ready to do anything for power. She didn't deserve the respect she had. I too differ with cho and ramesh on their stance, but I don't suspect their intentions. At one stage, cho accepted that he had gone little far than necessary in supporting J to the core.