Mock Trial: Murthy v. Missouri - Free Speech, Government & Misinformation on Social Media Platforms

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 13 июн 2024
  • The Supreme Court is taking up a case that could affect how you read about issues during a crucial election year. Government officials concerned about misinformation related to topics such as COVID and election integrity had requested that social media platforms take down some posts. Several plaintiffs then filed a lawsuit alleging that by doing so, the government was suppressing speech and certain viewpoints. Now, there’s a question of whether such government actions amount to coercion or are legitimate exercises of power. Those who argue coercion believe that government requests limit free speech, claim "misinformation" is subjective, and worry that increased content moderation could lead to authoritarian control over public discourse online. Those who argue legitimate cooperation say that platforms often voluntarily comply with these requests as part of their anti-misinformation policies, making it a collaborative effort for public benefit. They also note that in cases where misinformation threatens public health or safety, such as false information about vaccines, government intervention is justified to protect the public.
    Now in this mock trial, we take this question on the free speech, government, and misinformation on social media platforms.
    Plaintiff: Charles "Chip" Miller, Senior Attorney at the Institute for Free Speech
    Defendant: Rylee Sommers-Flanagan, Founder and Executive Director of Upper Seven Law
    Cross examiners: Nina Jankowicz, CEO of The American Sunlight Project; Former Executive Director of the Department of Homeland Security's Disinformation Governance Board
    Matt Taibbi, Best-selling Author and Journalist; Writer and Publisher of Racket News
    Eric Schurenberg, Business Journalist and Media Executive; Founder of the Alliance for Trust in Media
    Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
    #opentodebate #debate #mocktrial #influence #socialmedia #ElectionIntegrityPartnership #policy #misinformation #Twitter #CommuityNotes #Coercion #Freespeech #CISA #cybersecurity #security #communication #SCOTUS
    ===================================
    Subscribe: / @opentodebateorg
    Official site: opentodebate.org/
    Open to Debate Twitter: / opentodebateorg
    Open to Debate Facebook: / beopentodebate
    ===================================

Комментарии • 12

  • @OpentoDebate
    @OpentoDebate  11 дней назад

    Explore our latest newsletter insights and debater editorials - Free Speech, Government & Misinformation on Social Media Platforms
    What's next for social media platforms? opentodebate.org/newsletter-free-speech-government-and-misinformation-on-social-media-platforms/
    Sign up for our weekly newsletters here: opentodebate.org/newsletter

  • @NicholasWongCQ
    @NicholasWongCQ 13 дней назад +7

    The fact that this is open to debate shows you how far America has fallen.

  • @dannyferguson9415
    @dannyferguson9415 11 дней назад +1

    Great Debate! Thanks John and Open to Debate. Stay free all.

  • @armanshaghi
    @armanshaghi 14 дней назад

    Another interesting topic, thank you

  • @kaylee.snyder
    @kaylee.snyder 11 дней назад

    Loved it. Awesome video!

  • @BrianMcInnis87
    @BrianMcInnis87 14 дней назад

    'Media platforms' is redundant and a double plural.

  • @meghasingh4267
    @meghasingh4267 14 дней назад

    really good debate and some valid points

    • @FilipinaVegana
      @FilipinaVegana 14 дней назад

      Good and bad are RELATIVE. ;)
      Incidentally, Mrs. Singh, do you condone ABSOLUTE freedom of speech?

  • @NicholasWongCQ
    @NicholasWongCQ 13 дней назад +1

    Nina Jankowitch? Seriously? This is a new low for this channel.