Andy Biggs Leads House Judiciary Committee Hearing On Federal Overreach In Criminal Justice Policy
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024
- The House Judiciary Committee holds a hearing entitled, "Overreach: An Examination of Federal Statutory and Regulatory Crimes."
Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:
account.forbes...
Stay Connected
Forbes on Facebook: forbes
Forbes Video on Twitter: / forbes
Forbes Video on Instagram: / forbes
More From Forbes: forbes.com
Who in this wotld woukd listen to Nadler or Jackson-Lee.
Won't waste my time here.
"The moon is made up of mostly gasses." -Sheila Jackson Lee, the pinnacle of democRAT intelligence.
Ole Hank thinks that Guam will capsize if it’s overcrowded. It used to be intellects in Congress. Today, the more you can manipulate, the more successful the politician.
Good To Remember The Pledge. FEDERAL STATUARY AND REGULATORY CRIMES......OVER- REACH.
Georgia wake up! Ya'll have to do better than Hank Johnson. He needs to move to Guam as counter balance.
TOO MUCH GOVERNMENT!!!
Involved In To Much Criminality Against Americans
CORRECTION: THEY ARE NOT "LAWS", NOR IS THERE ANY JURISDICTION TO CREATE OR ENFORCE ANY SUCH THINGS
Should be illegal to pay inmates 9 cents am hour. I would be in the hole because I wouldn't work. Inmates should be paid the same as those on the outside. The earnings could be used to support their families, pay court fees, their commission account, the rest saved and giving to them when they leave.
Nadler shoukd bd re/named Wadleg
is the DEI woman drunk or lost the ability to read
What ever she is, she didn't earn it.
that is why we're here today, to pass legislation acknowledging we have too many laws. yeah, i foresee this resulting in literally nothing more than a waste of time, heartfelt and well-intended though it may be.
It would require a comprehensive overhaul of the federal legal code, something that the alphabet agencies will never allow to happen.
@@ravengrey6874 solutions?
@@Right_Dude_Here The simplest solution would be a "reset to zero". Congress decides what on several divisions of law, likely based on authorized executive departments, and establishes a fresh framework of basic laws that cover most situations. Regulatory powers of the executive dept. are strictly defined, legal precedent is reset, and all previous legal code not explicitly kept in place is repealed. Note, I said "simplest" not "simple".
@@ravengrey6874 you’re on to something with that
1:18:04 you might be saying to yourselves, “we already have mandatory supervised treatment programs in place for parolees and probationers”. You’d not be wrong. I will tell you from experience, these programs, specifically those which facilitate treatment for substance/alcohol abuse, are not taken seriously by those who have seen fit to mandate them, but rather they are quite literally, quite obviously designed for failure, and therefor directly support the prison industrial complex, not the re-entry of individuals into society. For those who are subject to these programs but have no interest in sobriety these programs are merely a speed bump(no pun intended) on the path to freedom from law enforcement supervision.
It's designed to fail AGREE 💯
Can we please get a similar examination of the horrifically unfair overly punitive legislation in the state's family court systems? Please note that, following repeated visits to those courts men suffer ten times the suicide rate that women do. Many actions taken by those courts are VERY counter-productive to the supposed goals but serve very well to punish men for being men (for instance, upon falling into arrears through no fault of their own men who have a processional license to practice their profession often find that license revokes, making it impossible to maintain the needed income level to pay child support and pay off the arrears, but there is no corresponding reduction in the monthly child support obligation. This makes is impossible to EVER meet the court's requirements, and results in multiple jailings for failing to pay off the arrears.) I classify the laws governing the family court systems as crimes against humanity, but since they overwhelmingly affect men no one cares.
I agree that family courts are the largest crime syndicates in the world.
@@hesuschrist9527 I was once a member of a Men's Rights group in Silicon Valley, having suffered in Family Court. We used to have weekly meetings, with guests. One time the guest was the San Jose DA in charge of Family Court. He said that he had many deputy DAs working under him, and he admitted that 90% of them were single feminist women with an agenda. That explained a lot to us. Those courts were created by feminists, legislated by feminists, and staffed by feminists, all with a seething hatred of men.
Is there a reason you guys get f'uped black women as hearing people in charge?😏
ERIC JEESSJ 😢
Good bad Right or Wrong 1 Guarantee More tax money is Taken and more people victimized from SOCIETY than all Criminals Combined steal every Year. Governance For Profit BUSINESS model with quotas and television entertainment
We need to stop talking about shit and start slowing the problems
Something is wrong with Jackson Lee, almost like shes having a stroke or something.
Just show up when you feel like i Nadler 😂
You can only control law-abiding citizens by criminalizing anyone at any time.
The American people deserve a impartial independent investigation into everyone's finances in Washington DC. We must hold all the wrongdoings accountable and responsible for their actions.
A yeah........ No
Jackson-Lee needs a new hat 😳
15:05 I consider someone who boots somebody out of first class because they have an supremacist complex an Bad Actor