Is Voting Halal or Haram/Shirk? - Ust. Abu Taymiyyah
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 2 июл 2024
- With the general elections approaching, many Muslims are questioning whether voting is permissible in Islam. They wonder if it is Halal or Haram, and whether it constitutes Shirk.
Ustaadh Abu Taymiyyah provides a thorough explanation on the matter.
00:00 - Introduction
01:24 - Where does Shirk come in?
02:50 - Flexibility of the Shari'ah
05:20 - Legal Maxims
08:20 - Fataawa of the Scholars
10:22 - Clarification of endorsement
🔗 Official Social Links
Instagram: / abutaymiyyahmj
X/Twitter: / abutaymiyyahmj
Let us know where you are listening from.
Iraq 🇮🇶
Love brother Abu Taymiyyah for the sake of Allah ❤
New York🍎(sch'dy)
Indiana
Kazakhstan
Islii
Rejecting Taghut and their Systems is the condition of Tawheed
Allah (SWT) said : "There is no compulsion in the deen, the right path has become distinct from the wrong path, whoever rejects Taghut, and believes in Allah, he has got a firm hold of the most trustworthy handhold that will never break, and Allah is the All hearing, all knowing."[2: 256]
❤
@@tawheedfirst861 “Indeed there has been an excellent example for you in Ibrahim (Abraham) and those with him, when they said to their people: ‘Verily, we are free from you and whatever you worship besides Allāh, we have rejected you, and there has started between us and you, hostility and hatred for ever, until you believe in (and worship) Allāh Alone…’” [Qur’an, Surah, 60: 4]
“And verily, We have sent among every Ummah (community, nation) a Messenger (proclaiming):‘Worship Allāh (Alone), and reject (or keep away from) Taghut.)’” [Qur’ān, Surah 16: 36]
“Allah is the Wali (Protector or Guardian) of those who believe. He brings them out from darkness into light. But as for those who disbelieve, their Auliya (allies, supporters and helpers) are Taghut [false deities and false leaders, etc.], they bring them out from light into darkness. Those are the dwellers of the Fire, and they will abide therein forever. ”[Quran, Surah, 2: 257]
Have you not seen those who claim to have believed in what was revealed to you, [O Muḥammad], and what was revealed before you? They wish to refer legislation to ṭāghūt,1 while they were commanded to reject it; and Satan wishes to lead them far astray 4.60
But no, by your Lord, they will not [truly] believe until they make you, [O Muḥammad], judge concerning that over which they dispute among themselves and then find within themselves no discomfort from what you have judged and submit in [full, willing] submission. 4.65
Secondly, the harm of voting in a democracy is so severe that it is affecting people's belief where they seek help and they see the current system as the only way to solve man's problems and the same people and scholars do not work for the re-implementation of Islam. This is evident. They have given up on this subject
The scholars work based on the pre-existent rules and guidelines that already existed at the time of the prophet (صلى الله عليه و سلم). This re-implementation thing seems to be wanting to replace those guidelines with new ones, so I'd say to be careful about what you're saying there. If no one is implementing Islam today, it means all Muslims are kuffar, just interpreting this literally.
And yes, there are scholars who spoke against democracy and the dangers and shirk of taking part in it outside of the guidelines they stated. Its not like this is a new system.
Lesser of the 2 evils is not to do the shirk in the first place
SubhanAllah. Never thought of this. Makes you think how they use lesser of the two evils in this case
Exactly because matters in kufr and shirk never changes
missed the entire point of the video… If you do NOT vote, a taghut will gain power. but if you do vote, perhaps a lesser taghut will gain power, and he will be better towards muslims than the one who wins due to your abstinence.
If you live in a country where there are two candidates; one says he will ban hijab and close the masajid, and the other says he will preserve them. They are both democratic kuffar, but one is better for islam. If you do not vote, then the islamophobic one will win. will you now say it’s still kufr to vote for the one who will aid the deen?
This is the point. Even tho installing a man made governance is kufr, someone who has no option but to live under it is not wrong for voting within it to support the muslims of the country.
Allahu a3lam, but do not sit here and make blanket statements like you are qualified for it.
@@Logos-TBE You do not commit kufr and shirk so that you may gain a few masjids. Kufr and shirk is a major issur above the things you are trying to solve by voting. Your argument makes no sense. Your basically saying lets commit kufr and shirk so that we remove something that is haram, or stop the ban on masjids. If there was no masaajids in your specific land - you can still pray in your homes. If they ban the hijab - women can stay at home or make hijra. None of your aruments allow one to commit shirk and kufr. The only possible reason that can be argued and taken to the scholars is if there is a real possibility of muslims being killed if they dont partake in these systems.
@@Logos-TBEHave you not seen those who claim to have believed in what was revealed to you, [O Muḥammad], and what was revealed before you? They wish to refer legislation to ṭāghūt, while they were commanded to REJECT IT; and Satan wishes to lead them far astray 4.60
I will never vote, I don't want blood on my hands.
👍
@@The-Heart-Will-Testify u still have blood on your hands when you pay tax 😭
@@user-bc2yl4og4r is being forced, I'm not agreeing to the decisions..u are not being forced to vote
We do have a 3rd option: not voting....
The Pratt is a Madkhali
Not voting and staying armed crossed is not a solution.
@@_naalimit who said anything about arm crossed. Political activism without voting is a lot more effective.
@@_naalimit The solution is in the Sunnah and not shirk voting
So lesser of two evils:
Party A: ruling by man made laws
Party B: ruling by man made laws but with friendly colors
What about option 3 of not voting at all?
Certainly that is a option as well as the first two option in basis are haram and option 3 of not voting is not haram.
YOU TOOK THE WORDS OUT OF MY MOUTH BRO
Soooo agree 👍. I was thinking the same thing. I find it interesting he dint say if you dont like the 2 evils that you can just not pick or vote for either of them
@@papasul29 rewatch the video with the intention to listen not hear
Whether you vote or not the elected government will still govern you
Alhamdulillah from Ghana 🇬🇭
Shaykh, we waited very long for a new video. 🌹
voting in a democracy system is haram. MPs go to a parliament, a parliament votes on haram matters and legislates rules which go against Shariah rules. Thus voting, partaking as a member of parliament its self, is all haram. Islam has its own political system, government and ruling system. Our obligation is to reinstate an islamic state ruled by and only islamic Shariah.
Pls don't confuse with democracy and Secularism..
Secularism is kufr..
What is Islam's political system? I'm genuinely curious. How do we define it?
Paying taxes is haram. They spend money on killing Palestinians by funding Israel. Stay unemployed forever or flee the country 🤣
This is your logic so be consistent please
He just explained everything.
Our people are terrible.
@@_naalimit i think you fail to understand what i mean. Reinstate an Islamic state is the end. With laws based on the Shariah. But in what manner do you propose? Autocracy? A ruler with absolute power. An elective "monarchy"? With a council of select individuals who have influence to decide who will be the next ruler. I'm asking about mechanisms and means to attain and maintain leadership in the Ummah.
From Palestine, Gaza City
call from Gaza from the midst of war death, hunger, destruction and pain. To the lovers of goodness, a kind greeting to every Muslim from a Palestinian mother from Gaza. The Prophet, may God’s prayers and peace be upon him, said: “We will never diminish the money you have given in charity.” narrated by Muslim
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''"""""""""""""""""""💔
""""""""""""""""""""""""'"""""""""
"""" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "'" ""''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''🤲
I have four orphan children, and we are in the midst of a war of extermination, displacement, hunger, pain, wounds, and deprivation. They were martyred in this war. My family and now I'm alone without a father. Today, I make this appeal to you from among the rubble and destruction, my brothers. I live under difficult circumstances, an unjust siege, and a blind war that destroyed my city in which I live, and my home that houses my children’s dreams. Today, I found myself living on top of the ruins of my home in a tent no more than a few meters long, with me and my four children. This is a very difficult thing that no human being can bear. I live in very difficult conditions without food, water, and flour due to the siege, and we drink water. Polluted due to lack of money and my children’s fear of war, and now I am asking for help and assistance in order to restore the smile of life to my children, and I am in dire need of your contribution in order to rebuild my house that was demolished, and I ask (WhatsApp me to donate 00970592511969)I wrote to you these short words that do not express a little of the pain and wounds that we are experiencing in Gaza, and I write these words to you while tears do not leave my eyes from the pain and cruelty of life. I hope that you will be supporters of my cause in all parts of the world and the ugliness of the injustice that we live in every day, but every minute. We lose loved ones every day. And do not forget the difficulty of life in a small tent that does not exceed a few meters. God was a protector for us from the heat of summer and the cold of winter in the tent, and today all my dreams are to drink a drop of cold, clean water in the summer and feed my children. Praise be to God in any case, this is God’s command. Note: I have a child who is sick in the eye, and he is forbidden by the doctor’s prescription from high heat and sunlight. How can he be in a very hot tent? Therefore, I ask you to help me in maintaining my house.
"" "" *"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""“"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
_________♡♡__&»»»»»»» ♕♕♕###؛؛:: "**"؟!!؛؛'*'::-::؛--___" "" "" "" "" "💔💔🎉🎉
يارب قد دقت الدنيا بنا وانت ارحم الراحمين نداء من فلسطين من وسط الحرب والموت والجوع والدمار والم ارجو من كل إنسان ان يقرأ ندائي بتأمل وان يضع نفسه في نفس الالم. الى من يحب فعل الخير ويحب الصدقة هذا الطريقه الوحيده الذي يمكن ان يصل صوتي لكم ان شاءالله وارجو منكم المسامحة على الازعاج تحيه طيبه الى كل مسلم من أم فلسطينية من غزة وقال النبي صل الله عليه وسلم (ما نقص مال من صدقه)
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''🤲
انا عندي اربع طفال ايتام ونحن فى ظل حرب الاباده والتهجير والتجويع والالم والجراح والحرمان لقد استشهدوا في هذا الحرب اسرتي وانا الان وحيدة بلا اب واليوم ارسل ندائي هذا من بين الركام والدمار لكم يا إخوتي انا اعيش في ظل ظروف صعبة و حصار ظالم وحرب عمياء ولقد دمرت مدينتي التي اعيش فيها و دمر بيتي الذي يؤوي احلام اطفالي واليوم لقد وجدت نفسي اعيش فوق ركام بيتي في خيمه لا تتجاوز عدت امتار انا واطفالي الاربعه هذا امر صعب جداً لا يتحمله إنسان واعيش ظروف صعبه جداً بدون طعام وماء و طحين بسبب الحصار ونشرب الماء الملوث بسبب قلت الاموال وخوف اطفالي من الحرب والان اطلب يد العون والمساعدة لكي اعيد بسمة الحياة الي اطفالي وانا في امس الحاجه الي المساهمه لكي اعيد بناء بيتي الذي هدم و ارجو منكم المساهمة كتبت لكم هذي الكلمات القصيرة التي لا تعبر الى القليل من الالم والجراح الذي نعيشه فى غزة واكتب لكم كلماتي هذه والدموع لا تفارق عيني من الالم وقسوة الحياة ارجو منكم ان تكونو مناصرين إلى قضيتي في جميع انحاء العالم وقبح الظلم الذي نعيشه في كل يوم بل كل دقيقه ونحن نفقد الاحبه كل يوم. ولا تنسو صعوبة الحياة في خيمة صغيرة لا تتعدى بعض الامتار كان الله لنا معين من حم الصيف والبرد الشتاء فى الخيمة واليوم كل احلامي ان اشرب نقطة ماء باردة ونظيفه في الصيف وطعام اطفالي. الحمدلله على كل حال هذا امر الله. ملاحظه يوجد عندي طفل مريض في العين وهوا ممنوع بوصف الطبيب من الحراره العاليه و اشعة الشمس فكيف يكون في خيمة شديدة الحرارة لذلك ارجو منكم ان تكونو لي عون في صيانة بيتي
والحمدلله حمد الشاكرين ولا حول ولا قوة الا بالله العلي العظيم
~~/🎉/🎉//🎉/🎉//🎉//🎉~😢~~🎉~~~♡♡♡♡♡♡~~~♡~♡~~♡~~♡~♡~♡~~~♡
May Allah bless you for speaking haqq, I know it’s not easy so may Allah increase you
What haq he still didnt say it is haram or haram or haram
Some scholars said voting is allowed in specific circumstances, but which reputable scholar gave the fatwa to vote in the upcoming elections in the UK? I want to know that before I vote
None. You will find amongst the people who call towards taking part push a certain individual by the name of haitham al haddad. This individual is a ikhwani and should be boycotted.
The Scholars from Egypt make inkar of the one who comes out and says it is wajib to vote, something never said before, another important thing to highlight is the hukm of the muslims entering politics in becoming politicians. Top Reputable Muhaditheen say this in and of itself is kufr because a person will be partaking in majalis of legislation and a system based on nothing but kufr and in reality there is no true benefit it is all speculative
Interesting
BarakAllahu fik
Salam alaykum bro. The ustadh in the video was talking about mafsada and maslaha. Wouldnt this topic (democracy and voting) come under the principle of ad daruurah instead? Or are these principles the same thing?
Shouldnt the ustadh have mentioned this principle more because it truly gives us the understanding when its permissble to vote ie when muslims are actually facing life n death situations. Which majority of muslims in these western societys arent.
I feel like those deviants who call people towards democracy and voting use the principle of mafsada and maslaha and dupe the masses. Muslims are led to believe theres more pros than cons so that gives us legitmacy in taking part. But if they used the principle of ad daruurah they wouldnt take part because they arent facing life n death situations. I hope im making sense
Who’s here for the premiere 👍🏻
If these questions are still topics of serious discussion then we have our reason why we are being butchered by others. We are stuck in the 1600s and they are asking about quantum physics
My sentiments exactly. I have said this hundreds of times before. We are debating mundane problems of medieval times, while the west is on the verge of artificial intelligence and sending humans to other planets. It’s pathetic.
This is a super strange stance to take but makes sense if you don’t realise nor understand that Islam is a way of life, the only religion that stands for and makes sense for eternity. The rulings put in place back then are what will help societies and communities thrive now and forever. Allaah always knows best. Nothing needs upgrading or updating.
I really needed this talk. I promised myself I would never vote Labour(who is Muslim) but the conservatives in my area are too strong(he is evil) and there was no alternative or independent. I feel sick to my stomach with this vote
The workers party candidates are also usually Muslim! They're pro ceasefire and against teaching LGBT in school
I would not vote for Labour or Conservatives, if no other viable independent prob best not to vote. Allah knows best
The candidate in Leicester that he gave as an example is called
Shockat Adam btw
I've truly never seen anything like it
What about her ? Why are you so shocked? , pray tell .....
Al hamdulilah from Texas
Even within a country of people who didn't believe in Allah, prophet Yusuf (AS) asked to take charge of preventing hunger in the land based on the dream of a king who was not Muslim.
No one should seek the headaches of leadership, but sometimes it becomes necessary if it'll protect the people.
And Allah knows best.
What kind of logic are you using? Islam before prophet Muhammad was not the one we have in it's entirety as in all rules and regulations etc and even if so you are comparing a prophet of Allah to general normal Muslims in 2024...
Al Imam Qurtubi gave the same explanation that Bro Abdulqadir gave@@yeager9731
You have explained it very nicely
@@yeager9731everything in the Qur'an is applicable to us whether it's today or tomorrow
Unless you want to tell us the examples in the Qur'an
What is the Quran saying when Yusuf as meets the king? „فلما كلمه" What is the first message a Prophet is delivering when meeting people, especially people of high ranks? Tawhid.
And then the king find Yusuf as trustworthy and gives him a position in full independency.
So your example of the story is not applicable
And Allah knows best
الله المستعان
First abu taymiyyah confirmed that the only one who can make laws for the creation is Allah alone.
So lawmaking falls under tawheed ar-rububiyyah.
But after that he says that if there is a masla7a then you can chose another lawmaker beside Allah.
Where in the quran or sunnah you can make masla7a for issues that falls under tawheed rububiya?
So lets give an example for tawheed uluhiya so that you understand what i mean.
We know that slaughtering is only for Allah and this falls under tawheed uluhiya.
Can someone then say that out of masla7a you can slaughter for another besides Allah ?
Toooooo scared of Al salool the queen ben Sillyman son of Sillyman Al saood 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Moreover he said if its a case of the lesser of the 2 evils. Is there an evil greater than Shirk. How can a maslaha permit you to do shirk.
@@abutalsafuba2179 madkhalies
Surely the lessers of two evils scenario would only apply if we were forced to vote, right?
Correct
Allahumma barik lahu
Good question 👍
I love the shake but I will disagree with him on the following
When you can make an exemption to the wall, you can't make it based on any benefits. There is no evidence for this and this is this pure man-made opinion. Everything that has been used has been related to life and death scenarios in our current reality that does not happen
Alhamdulillah from the USA
Why would it be haram? What type of question is this honestly
It is worse than haraam. Legislation is for Allah alone
How do we reconcile the two principles of mafasada/maslaha with ad-daruurah? Wouldnt ad daruurah negate anyone taking part in voting and democracy at all because in most cases muslims are not threatened by life / death situation to allow them commit a sin.
Or do the scholars so both principles here?
Many of the Muslim in governance have adopted an Islamic laws in their practise in order to achieve status. Yet the imams are silent on these candidates so we see inconsistency in their behaviour just as they are silent on the action of the rulers today
The warding off of evil takes precedence of bringing about good - how do we apply this
It is not true that this predicament is unique to this time. Muslims had to deal with Mongols and their law from Jasiq who at the time apparently accepted Islam but scholars like ibn Taymiyya rahimehullah made takfir on them unless they accept sharia and judge with it. Ibn Kethir rahimehullah spoke of this as well.
There are other examples. None from the salaf or khalef made any excuse or provided any leeway in this matter. It is a form of Shirk which you can do only in state of Ikrah. In matters like this there is no maslaha.
Imagine if people as collective decide to chose which members of ruling elite of mongols will be allowed to decide what set of halal and haram will be applied over them. We are not even forced to vote today, it is all based on illusion that it will be better. The illusion of choice.
It is like if they said: if you people make sajdah to idol we will be better to you muslims, we will not invade your lands that often and will not put laws to make your life a little bit harder. Maybe we will not pursue the policy of deportation to your original lands where you came from.
This is false. Ibn Taymiyya made takfir of the mongols for their siding with the kuffar against the Muslims
@@DeitritusFillamore That as well, it is separate mes'ela.
@@justmeldin6062this is incorrect. Takfir was made because the mongols preferred their yassa code over the sharia and considered it better. Nobody here is claiming to prefer American/British law over the shariah
@@DeitritusFillamoreThen why do you vote. Democracy is shirk and your feelings don’t matter.
The moment you vote for it you have made your decision. You people are playing with something and taking it lightly that is considered as Shirk.
@DeitritusFillamore They legislated by both the Quran and Yasiq. The takfir was made due their legislation by the Yasiq. There was no need for a verbal proclamation of their preference to Yasiq over the Quran.
I say vote for Independent Muslim MPs, not for Muslims associated with Labour or Conservatives
What will they do? They are not doing anything for Muslims they like all the others are using Palestine for votes they know very well they can mention it but nothing will happen but they make their voters believe otherwise
and who are you to give this fatwa
@@fulan03exactly
@@SNIPERS327 What are they going to do?
@@fulan03. And who are you to give fatwa??? Have you studied this according to what the scholars of said on this or you following young spuds on RUclips!
So you want to give vote to people who support LGBT and Genocide!
اللهم سخر لنا من عبادك الصادقين المصلحين من يكونوا عوناً لنا في طريقنا ندائي إلي كل مسلم قال عزوجل (قُلْ إِنَّ رَبِّي يَبْسُطُ الرِّزْقَ لِمَنْ يَشَاءُ مِنْ عِبَادِهِ وَيَقْدِرُ لَهُ وَمَا أَنْفَقْتُمْ مِنْ شَيْءٍ فَهُوَ يُخْلِفُهُ وَهُوَ خَيْرُ الرَّازِقِينَ) وقال النبى ﷺ(ما نقص مال من صدقة ) رواه مسلم وقال ﷺ ( أنفق يابن آدم ينفق الله عليك) متفق عليه وقال ﷺ:( مَا مِنْ يَوْمٍ يُصبِحُ العِبادُفِيهِ إِلَّا مَلَكَانِ يَنْزِلانِ، فَيَقُولُ أَحَدُهُمَا: اللَّهُمَّ أَعْطِ مُنْفِقًا خَلَفًا، وَيَقُولُ الآخَرُ: اللَّهُمَّ أَعْطِ مُمْسِكًا تَلَفًا سِالُتتكِ بّالُلُُه 💔الُجْلُيَلُ الُجْبّارَ انَ تْنَقًذَنَا قًبّلُ انَ نَمٌوَتْ مٌنَ شِدِتْ الُجْوَع انَتٌْخيَكِ انَيَ دٌِخلُةِ ْعلُى الُلُُه تْمٌ ْعلُيَكِ انَيَ فَيَ وَجُْهك انَـيَ اخـتْكِ انَـيَ اتْرَجْـاكِ اتْـوَسِـلُ الُـيَـكِ انَـقًـذَنَا لُـوَجُْـه الُـلُُـه. يَــشِــُهدِ الُــلُــُه يَاٌخـيَ انَ مٌنَ الُــصّــبّاحُ حُـتْا الُـانَ يَــحُــرَمٌ ْعـــلُيَـنَـا الاكل غير الماء ( ('''''''''''''''' اخي اول كلامي انا اقسم بالله على كتاب الله اني لااكذب عليك ولا انصب ولا احتال اني بنت يمنيه نازحين منالحرب انا واسرتي بيتنا اجار الشهرب 20 الف يمني والان علينا 60 الف حق 3 شهور وصاحب البيت من الناس الي ماترحم والله يا اخي انه يجي كل يوم يبهدلنا ويتكلم علينا ويريد من البيت للشارع لانناماقدرنا ندفعله الأجار شافونا الجيران نبكي ورجعو تكلمو الجيران ومهلنالاخره الأسبوع معادفعنا له حلف يمين بالله هذا بيخرجنا إلى الشارع رحمه واحنا. بلادنا بسبب هذا الحرب ولانجد قوت يومنا وعايشين اناوامي واخواتي سفار والدنا متوفي الله يرحمه ومامعنا أحد في هذا الدنيا جاانبنا في هذه الظروف القاسيه اخوتي الصغار خرجو للشارع وشافو الجيران ياكلو واوقفو عند بابهم لجل يعطوهم ولو كسره خبز والله الذي له ملك السموات والارض انهم غلفو الباب وطردوهم ورجعو یبکو ایموتو من الجوع ما احد رحمهم وعطلة ردها لقمت عیش والان لوما احدنا ساعدنا في إيكيلو دقيق اقسم بالله انموت من الجوع فيا اخي انا دخيله على الله ثم عليك واريد منك المساعده لوجه الله انشدك بالله تحب الخير واتساعدني ولو ---بـــحق إيجار البيت مع تراسلي واتساب على هذا الرقم 00967716649494 وتطلب اسم بطاقتي وترسلي ولاتتاخر وايعوضك الله بكل خير اخواني سغار شوف كيف حالتهم وساعدنا وأنقذنا قبل أن يطردونا في الشارع تتبهدل أو نموت من الجوع وانا واسرتي نسالك بالله لولك مقدره على مساعد لاتتاخر علينا وجزاك الله خيرا،-.@.،@:^@:؛>»≋𝖊≋𝖊≋𝖊≋𝖊≋𝖊≋𝖊≋𝖊≋𝖊≋𝖊≋𝖊≋𝖊≋𝖊≋𝖊≋𝖊≋𝖊≋^°>,,,_\},_\|`,_\;_\-ا¯||>•°¶ا;ا▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎▪︎,,,،،،،،،،،،،😢😢😢😢😢😢😢≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪≪
What I learned is that matters in shirk and kufr never changes. So I learned that it is kufr however when it comes to takfeer you stop there.
It's kufr but when it comes to the person it's different.
I thought ustadh was wearing a blazer in the thumbnail and I realised it’s just it thobe 😂😂
why not just "If you can avoid voting, avoid otherwise vote for less evil one"? I think people in the UK have the right to not vote
bro a LOT of us Muslims are now making a big deal about national elections because of our governments' stance on the Palestinian issue. . . I didn't vote in our local election because of my view on voting, but I took my mom. The result made it trivial
Wouldnt voting in kufr systems come under ad daruurah? Instead of mafsada and maslaha?
I mean this in good faith insha’Allah. I love ustadh for the sake of Allah, but did he essentially not just say “here’s what Allah says in the Quran, but here is why the ulema disagree and compromise on His hukm.”
No.
I would say "misunderstand" instead of ''disagree", "disagree" is the "yahood" stage, but clearly this kind of deviance is what led past generations to what we know.
What the ulama discuss is also part of what Allah spoke about. For example when Allah prohibits something, that thing can become halal in a certain restricted scenario. Take pork for example. There is an ayah that says you can eat it if your facing life / death. So here a prohibition becomes allowed for a reason.
This sort of discourse is part of our religion. And on the topic of democracy and voting majority of the scholars called it kufr and shirk (democracy and voting in them) but some said it comes under daruurah (when a haram becomes halal) in certain places.
Now we gotta study whar daruurah is because alot of deviants try to advantage of these legal frameworks. I hope you understand
@@Mohammed5i jazakAllah khair for your insight. My understanding is that dharurah is only applied in life and death scanariors and to use that to validate voting for someone who will represent you and make laws that are not from shariah is a misapplication of this concept of dharurah. and Allah knows best
@@huthaifahkhan yes i fully agree with you. Majority of the muslims residing in non muslim rule are not facing life and death situations. Those who call towards voting and taking part want muslims to have extra comfort interms of local facililities and amenties. Basically hubb ul dunya. Love for this world. Their votes isnt a vote thats stopping a group killing muslims or planning to.
Those deviants who call towards voting and democracy use the principle the ustadh used of maslaha and mafsada. This is a principle that can be used for own gains and purposes depending who is making the call. This principle, yes its part of the deen, shouldnt be made by local unknown imams too. Which is why some have taken advantage of it.
We need to vote. In europe we got so many right parties getting alot of votes. please vote parties against them
Assalaamu 'Alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi Wa Barakatuh. I’m listening from Seattle 🇺🇸. I haven’t voted 🗳️ since I was in university. Why would I vote for a non believer?
No, both biden and trump are zanadiqah kuffar tawagheet that you should stay away from voting to.
Stay Muslim, don't vote, these idiots have sold their eeman, that's it
I stopped voting since Iraq invasion but this year inshaAllah I will vote for our muslim independent here in Blackburn Lancashire
It's sad how many Muslims kept voting for the same two parties but woke for gaza, many Muslim mps are just band waggoning this sorry time.
Lecturing about Halal and Haram all day long- don't drink it's Haram, don't do drugs, don't do Zinah etc - but we changing Legislation and we are changing everything Halal to Haram and Vice-versa.... it's not like Lobbying anyways;
There is a 3rd option, don’t vote 👍🏼
The real option is Dastur al-Madina made by Muhammad saws.
The best welfare government system where family, market and state is perfectly balanced.
Feared by everyone that is corrupted and wants to take advantage of others or the general poplulation.
By not voting you indirectly supported the person promoting genocide of Muslims and LGBT etc
@@rasmus4236 you would need 1 leader not a thousand
@@k00lmoh you clearly don’t know what you’re talking about.
Dastur al-Madina ensures 1 leader and not a thousand
@@rasmus4236there is nothing called dastur al madina, there was wathiqa ( agreement paper) b/w prophet & jewish on how to safeguard the city under the hukum of prophet mohamed salahu aleyhi wasalam. When the jewish violated the terms of agreement they have been evacuated from the city and some of them have been killed for their treasory. That was all
What is the final answer?
its kufr
The opinion given in this video is that in general it is kufr, but there are circumstances wherein if a candidate is endorsing the affairs of muslims, or is a lesser evil of a group of greater evils, it can be permissible.
@@definitelynotanentirecolon1026
So non Muslim must bend to Muslims in non Muslims countries?
@@user-vb3ri5gh6r they do no have to do anything, they are infidels
SubanAllah do any of our scholars know how politics works. This is the problem they dont understand politics based on that they give the wrong hukum.
We need scholars who actually have political background and understanding especially western politics.
How much of the Quran have you memorized? Before you try to disrespect the scholars knowledge fix yourself.
From Toronto 😊😊
Alhamdulillah ala kulli haal, from India
May the almighty Allah bless my brother Abu taymiyyah for talking about this it's just unfortunately today Muslims country's ar in the UN some are in NATO an we as Muslims know for sure what this organizations are doing especially against Muslims may the almighty Allah guide as all as Muslims............😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢 🤲🏼🤲🏼🤲🏼🤲🏼🤲🏼
7. Shaikh Abdul-Muhsin al-Àbbaad.
Reference: Private sitting with the Shaikh on January 19th, 2007 (29 Dhul Hijjah 1427):
There is a question from America related to the ruling of Muslims living in non-Muslim countries who vote in local elections. Is it permissible for these Muslim minorities to vote in local elections if they believe that one of the candidates can benefit the Muslims by giving land, allowing them to give dawah, or other benefits?
Shaikh: There is no harm in voting for candidates who will be of more benefit to the Muslims than the others. In this instance, voting for them is an example of doing the lesser of two evils to avoid the greater evil. All of the candidates are disbelievers and, therefore, harmful. However, the candidate who is less harmful to the Muslims is better than the candidate whose harm is far greater.
Questioner: For the one who says that voting is from the innovated means, for example...?
Shaikh: In any event, this is something evil with which the people have been afflicted. If people have two choices, one being abhorrent and the other also detestable but of less harm, which should the people choose? The people should choose the lesser of the two evils, correct? Even though the Roman Christians and the Persians are all disbelievers, the people were happy when the Roman Christians were victorious over the Persians.
Questioner: Some people oppose this by mentioning that they are not forced to vote in the first place?
Shaikh: What I have mentioned is based on the premise that some benefit for the Muslims may be attained by voting. However, if there is no benefit then they should not participate.
6:50 Astaghfirullah
a nice balanced approach. i personally wont be voting nonetheless
By not voting - you support the status quo without realising it.
@@mikhan5191 which status quo??
@@mikhan5191what 😂😂
@@AANaeem - the current existing political rule in whichever country you reside in.
If it is a bad/evil system then, by not voting, you made the CHOICE of not helping to remove that evil.
@@mikhan5191 ok
Oh my god not this again. We jad this discussion back 2015 😢
The ruling on parliaments is that they are not allowed and they are places of Shirk and Kufr, and we see them as Thaghut because they are places of legislation and of making laws and judging by other than what Allah has sent down (the Shariah).
And the basis of parliaments and democracy is “judgment of the people for the people” and the people are the ones who legislate through their representatives who are called “parliamentarians”.
And this goes against singling out Allah alone for judging and legislating and ordering and forbidding.
Allah says:
إن الحكم إلا لله
“The judgment is for none but Allah”
Surat Al An’am 6:57
And it (judgment) is not for the people.
And Allah says:
أفحكم الجاهلية يبغون
“Do they then seek the judgement of (the Days of) Ignorance?”
Surat al Ma’idah 5:50
And Allah says:
ولا يشرك في حكمه أحدا
“He makes none to share in His Decision and His Rule.”
Surat Al Kahf 18:26
It is not for the parliament, or for the people, or for anyone.
As for the claim of the one who says that the foundation of democracy and parliaments is established upon Shura (Islamic consultation) then this is either lie and deceit or ignorance and misguidance. It is not established upon the Islamic Shura, rather it is based on legislation, and they consult amongst themselves not on those issues that are permitted, rather they consult in order to legislate laws that contradict the Shariah. And this is the reality of them.
As for the ruling on those who enter them (parliaments), then there are some details to this:
1) If he enters them and legislates man made laws which contradict the Shariah, or agrees to or is pleased with a law that contradicts the Shariah or votes for it, then this person is a Mushrik (Polytheist) Kaafir (Disbeliever), and he is not excused for ignorance or misinterpretation or (for considering it as bringing) benefits.
Allah says:
أم لهم شركاء شرعوا لهم من الدين ما لم يأذن به الله
“Or do they have partners (false gods) with Allah, who have legislated for them a religion which Allah has not allowed?”
Surat Ash Shuraa 42:21
And Allah says:
إن الحكم إلا لله
“The judgment is for none but Allah”
Surat Al An’am 6:57
And Allah says:
ولا يشرك في حكمه أحدا
“He makes none to share in His Decision and His Rule.”
Surat Al Kahf 18:26
2) If he enters and swears to respect the Kufr constitution knowing that the constitution contradicts the Shariah, then this is Kufr (disbelief) and Riddah (apostasy), whether he was serious (in his oath) or not, and whether it was done for benefit or not. He has indeed committed this act of Kufr by choice, knowingly and intentionally. And he is like the one who takes an oath to respect Al Laat and Al Uzza, or takes an oath to respect the laws of the Quraish during the time of the Messenger, sallallahu alayhi wa sallam.
3) He does not take an oath to respect the constitution, and does not legislate or participate in legislation which contradicts the Shariah, but he rejects that and votes against it - this person is mistaken and misguided and he goes against the guidance of the Messenger sallallahu alayhi wa sallam in bringing change and reform and in establishing the Islamic State, but he is not a Kaafir even though he has taken a path of misguidance and Shirk as a path for Dawah and bringing change and refThe ruling on parliaments is that they are not allowed and they are places of Shirk and Kufr, and we see them as Thaghut because they are places of legislation and of making laws and judging by other than what Allah has sent down (the Shariah).
And the basis of parliaments and democracy is “judgment of the people for the people” and the people are the ones who legislate through their representatives who are called “parliamentarians”.
And this goes against singling out Allah alone for judging and legislating and ordering and forbidding.
Allah says:
إن الحكم إلا لله
“The judgment is for none but Allah”
Surat Al An’am 6:57
And it (judgment) is not for the people.
And Allah says:
أفحكم الجاهلية يبغون
“Do they then seek the judgement of (the Days of) Ignorance?”
Surat al Ma’idah 5:50
And Allah says:
ولا يشرك في حكمه أحدا
“He makes none to share in His Decision and His Rule.”
Surat Al Kahf 18:26
It is not for the parliament, or for the people, or for anyone.
As for the claim of the one who says that the foundation of democracy and parliaments is established upon Shura (Islamic consultation) then this is either lie and deceit or ignorance and misguidance. It is not established upon the Islamic Shura, rather it is based on legislation, and they consult amongst themselves not on those issues that are permitted, rather they consult in order to legislate laws that contradict the Shariah. And this is the reality of them.
As for the ruling on those who enter them (parliaments), then there are some details to this:
1) If he enters them and legislates man made laws which contradict the Shariah, or agrees to or is pleased with a law that contradicts the Shariah or votes for it, then this person is a Mushrik (Polytheist) Kaafir (Disbeliever), and he is not excused for ignorance or misinterpretation or (for considering it as bringing) benefits.
Allah says:
أم لهم شركاء شرعوا لهم من الدين ما لم يأذن به الله
“Or do they have partners (false gods) with Allah, who have legislated for them a religion which Allah has not allowed?”
Surat Ash Shuraa 42:21
And Allah says:
إن الحكم إلا لله
“The judgment is for none but Allah”
Surat Al An’am 6:57
And Allah says:
ولا يشرك في حكمه أحدا
“He makes none to share in His Decision and His Rule.”
Surat Al Kahf 18:26
2) If he enters and swears to respect the Kufr constitution knowing that the constitution contradicts the Shariah, then this is Kufr (disbelief) and Riddah (apostasy), whether he was serious (in his oath) or not, and whether it was done for benefit or not. He has indeed committed this act of Kufr by choice, knowingly and intentionally. And he is like the one who takes an oath to respect Al Laat and Al Uzza, or takes an oath to respect the laws of the Quraish during the time of the Messenger, sallallahu alayhi wa sallam.
3) He does not take an oath to respect the constitution, and does not legislate or participate in legislation which contradicts the Shariah, but he rejects that and votes against it - this person is mistaken and misguided and he goes against the guidance of the Messenger sallallahu alayhi wa sallam in bringing change and reform and in establishing the Islamic State, but he is not a Kaafir even though he has taken a path of misguidance and Shirk as a path for Dawah and bringing change and reform.
Allah says:
فماذا بعد الحق إلا الضلال
“And what is after truth, except falsehood”
Surat Yunus 10:32
And we have discussed this issue in our book “Al Jam’u wa Thajreed Fee Sharh Kitaab At Tawheed” in the chapter “The call to Tawheed”, and it is the issue of the ruling on entering the parliaments”
- Shaykh ‘Alî Bin Khudayr al-Khudayr (fak’Allāhu asrahū)orm.
Allah says:
فماذا بعد الحق إلا الضلال
“And what is after truth, except falsehood”
Surat Yunus 10:32
And we have discussed this issue in our book “Al Jam’u wa Thajreed Fee Sharh Kitaab At Tawheed” in the chapter “The call to Tawheed”, and it is the issue of the ruling on entering the parliaments”
- Shaykh ‘Alî Bin Khudayr al-Khudayr (fak’Allāhu asrahū)
He is calling to kufr. Because when you vote in the west, you have to understand the reality. You're not simply voting for a leader, but rather you are voting for a deputy who will go to the legislating chambers that will propose/vote laws that goes against the Shari'ah. Abu Taymiyyah said it himself, legislating is a right that belongs to Allah alone so he who legislates with other than what Allah legislated has claimed something that belongs to Allah alone and has claimed rububiyyah which makes him a taghut, a false diety. And if you vote for tawagheet you are essentialy voting for another false god which is kufr. It is equivalent to do a vote on who to bow to and ask rizq. Except that instead of sujood and rizq, it is hakimiyyah.
It's haram to vote in the west but halal to live,eat, reproduce and poop in the west !! 👏
Elhamdulilah Brother
may Allah Azzawajal bless you many muslims have a Big misconception about this topic. Hikmayah / following the sharia is an ibada and we only make ibada to Allah Azzawajal and not to another Person. That doesnt allow you to vote because there is no sharia yet ( in sha Allah son). So a muslim isnt allow to vote on These election of the kufar
It's even worse than that, because if the winning candidate will be a taghout, what about those who voted for him? Democracy offers them the power of legislation and they chose to use that power through the vote, delegating it to someone who will exercise this power on their behalf.
I just don't have words for how deeply this issue have entered into our Ummah. And I blame 'ulamas that are right on this matter to not be more vocal. WaLlahu'l musta3an.
He didn't call to anything he only mentioned why some scholars allowed it
@@fulan03what are their arguments for allowing it?
These Sheikhs they dont talk these about kings but when it come for umma to elect the lesser the evil they came with this non sense
We do have the 3rd option, which is the correct option, to seek and prepare the grounds for the governor who Allah appointed on this earth, who will uphold the government of Allah.
THE MAHDI (AS)
Can you not say that staying away of these legislaters is principle of Islam
To scared
He isn’t qualified to speak on these issues, whether he is for or against them. Seek guidance from the Mufti; we have hundreds of trusted institutions, such as Darul Iftaa in Egypt, Jordan, and more. We are placing matters of religion in the hands of children who lack traditional study or Sanad.
Have those institutions in Egypt and Jordan spoken en masse about their countries supporting Israel?
@@WillScarlet1991😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 people prefer to be blind this days 😂😂😂😂😂 they dont want to see the Light when you are pointing with your finger to the moon in the darkest place they just simply will close they eyes and they will respond I dont see the moon I cant see it
ruclips.net/video/RqSc7EGaaeQ/видео.htmlfeature=shared
Sheikh al Albaanis view on the topic
Down under, Australia 🇦🇺
Salam Alaikum and G'day mate
Voting is definitely haram. When we vote we are actively participating in a non shariah practice.
If you can overthrow democracy and get Sharia, good for us.
If you live in a country and by elections we can get a president who can introduce Sharia, good for us. You need to cast your vote.
If you live in a country and there is Democracy and that countries leader is hurting your Muslim brothers and sisters in another country, what would you do to keep him from re-elected? I would commit sin, just to do a good deed for my brothers and sisters. And if I have to go to hell for it, so be it. However, Allah is forgiving and most merciful.
In the end Allah knows best.
Canada
Lastly, to The honourable respected Sheikh that I do Love and admire, our imams need to have the vision and foresight of how the disbelievers game strategy is and if we look at it from a different angle like a game of chess, we need to see the dangers and effects and their aims in why they are pushing Muslims to vote. And if we can see this which only a few scholars do, you will understand that taking part in democracy is the greater of two evils. May Allah bless you
It's Haram to Vote Labour/Conservative Vote Muslim independent candidate 😂
Have we not seen even when its left, right or central parties , they all come out with same stance when it comes to wars like Afghanistan, Palestine, Libya, Iraq etc. PPl need to understand that these western countries are part of the block of NATO and European Union so some of the stuff even if they dont want to do they have to because of the commitments they made. So no matter who you vote into power will not change that. Only thing your independent MPs will do in parliaments is just give speeches but they don't have any power to alter the course. In western countries like Britain non muslim representation will always be more then muslim representation because its their country & majority of population is not muslim. So whats the point of voting for ppl who can do nothing but speeches.
It is not permissible to vote under any circumstances because of the shirki connotations the vote itself has. The fact that one thinks there are options available to chose from two relative evil shows the deep reality myopia self appointed leaders suffer from. Saudi state scholars are not legitimate fatwa source nor any non state mufti who does not clearly advocate alwala walbara weather they are slafis or psudeo madthhabis.
Ahsant
Thank you Shaykh User-gu6gm1fm8f
The real option :
Dastur al-Madina!
Even if you use your common sense, why would anyone want to vote for liars
I have do to some deconstruction on psychology
Related to Islam:
Back then last prophet had four marriages and most Muslims lived or still living with the same mindset
(there are more layers in this topic)
But do you think it is logical or educated for it to be carried in the generations ahead
Does Today's educated man or a Muslim applies the same way in their life, during his religious practice?
What’s illogical about Polygyny?
@@YourLordIsOne According to hadith: the prophet didn't marry all four wives at the same time (polygamy) it was done for different spiritual reasons
So you can retort it with the rest of the above question
@@miss_8thwonderyou are operating under the fallacy that your culture’s mores are objectively superior to that which preceded it. But this is not true.
The rules of Allah apply to all times.
There’s so many conditions regarding taking multiple wives and it becomes a sin if the man doesn’t fulfill these conditions (for example, must show equal love to all of them, provide for them equally, etc). Realistically, in today’s world, it is more financially wise to have one so you are comfortable. At the same time, it is encouraged to marry multiple if the man is not satisfied or if there’s lots of widowers,divorcees.
To be fair, it harms nobody when it is done right as some people want their husbands to marry multiple wives. Usually girls can state if they don’t want to have co-wives and put in their marriage contract and if the contract is broken, they can seek divorce.
@@miss_8thwonder I do not mean this to be aggressive, but rather an educational discourse. The Prophet (SAW) had multiple wives at the same time, just as Abraham and Solomon did in the bible, just as Alexander (The Great they call him) had as well, just as all societies before a century always had.
It was a norm, up until the 1900s when it was challenged by liberalism and democracy which have no objective moral grounding. Still, rather it is based upon the subjective accumulation of opinions based on culture and norms that change occasionally. There is no rational reason a secular could argue against polygyny, but purely emotional.
Liberalism and democracy base morality on the agreement of humans. Humans who follow said doctrines assert morality based on upbringing and culture. Upbringing and culture is subjective, and changes from place to place, people to people, time to time.
Thing A under subjective morality may be seen as good by one person, and bad by another. Good at one time, bad at another. Its moral status would be dependent on the subjects who assess it's moral status. Outside of all subjects, therefore, Thing A is neither good nor bad in this paradigm. This is the definition of Subjective Morality.
From a theological standpoint (for Islam specifically), the status of morality or permissibility is based upon an outside party from humans, who is eternal and created man. The outside party (Allah) has all wisdom and knowledge; therefore, His judgment is not open to error, mistake, and change. If Allah deems Thing A to be impermissible, it is therefore objectively impermissible with no argument.
If an individual comes along under a subjective perspective attempting to challenge it based on subjective evidence and standards, upbringing, and society, it would be an argument based on subjectivity.
The only way an individual could assess it on an objective standard would be to assess the claim that the moral claim did actually come from Allah (The Creator). Many have attempted to challenge the existence of Allah and Islam, however, via rational proofs, signs, and various evidences, Islam will and always has been established to be true in rational discourse. This is as its signs were revealed by the creator of the heavens and the earth, and therefore the signs and evidences are obvious and acceptable to a rational thinker who seeks truth.
I hope you understand and welcome any questions. I do not mean this to be aggressive.
You’re free not to vote because of your religious beliefs!!
👍
But the uk is not a muslim state so what can muslims do and why do muslim countries not help follow muslims so they can go there instead of non muslim countries.
Lesser of 2 evils not lesser of 2 Kufr. We are in democratic country so you should at least explain why democracy is kufr. Democracy is not a major sin that you can categorise it under akhafe ad dararayn...
Walahi this brother is a Murji...don't play with tawheed. No one is going to harm Muslims in the UK nor should Muslims stay in the UK...they are all economic migrants.
May Allah guide these Murjia daees
What about the people of Palestine. The Muslim leaders are quiet on this topic. The least Muslims in the West can do is vote for someone who might end this. The prophet peace be upon him sent people to Ethiopia to save them from the evil that was killing them. Some Muslims are in the West because they come from Iraq, Syria, Palestine, etc. Make Muslim countries accessible then make assumptions. Calling the brother a Murji is truly disgusting on your part. Have some fear of Allah. And he quoted scholars. Are you saying the scholars are supporting Kufr?
@@mera4309 be realistic no muslim is gonna be allowed to reach MP status and still keep their deen
@@mera4309the fact ur hoping a party in the west is going to help Palestine shows ur delusion and ur lack of faith in Allah. If the United Nations haven’t stopped it and they’re supposed to be about peace and protecting humanity u think some dusty mp is going to stop the war in Palestine. Come back to reality, we put our faith in Allah first and foremost not these kufars and kufr systems. Furthermore it was the UK that ur willing to vote and seek help from that gave rights to the zionists to steal land there, u think they can ever get them to stop or leave.
@@mera4309you are delusional if u think US & UK policy towards israel and plastine will change acc to who is in power. Who implanted israel in the land of plastine in the first place ? U really developed stockhom syndrome
@@mera4309 if we, as an Ummah, are humiliated, it's mainly because we left our deen, just as the prophet sallallahu 'alayhi wa sallal said in a famous hadith. And one of the most obvious deviances I can see is our incapacity to clearly disavow democracy.
In other words, the least we can do for Palestine is to abstain from any form of shirk. In a sense, voting is actually the worst we can do for Palestine, and I have no idea how I can make this understandable, other than what our own prophet prophesied about our situation.
Do you realise that you imply that exclusiveness of tashri3 is a variable, and does not belong to Allah in our current era and circumstances ??
You're not able to promote a specific candidate, which is one of many proofs that it's not about the lesser of 2 evils, otherwise you would clearly call to vote for one. If you can't then there's no clear maslaha.
As for Ibn Taymiya's fatwa, was it about someone who will have to make bay'a to a taghut king and constitution, or was it someone who will have freedom to apply Allah's law within his perimeter of action (like prophet Yusuf 'alayhi salam)? Is any candidate today able to implement any part of the shari'a in the UK?
The biggest mafsada today is really to take that power of legislation that democracy wants to give us, through the vote, where it only belongs to Allah. The biggest maslaha is to avoid it and find other ways to have a political impact.
It is so irresponsible to call for lesser of 2 evils when most of your audience haven't disavowed democracy in the first place. And this is on the shoulders of 'ulamas and preachers who never talk about the kufr of democracy as a political system. As for those who see democracy as a good system, la a3budu ma ta3budun.
4. Shaikh 'Abdul 'Azeez bin 'Abdullaah bin Baaz
Source: al-Aqalliyaat al-Muslimah - Page 34, Fatwa No.8:
Question: It is noticeable that most Muslim minorities around the world concentrate on uniting the Muslims while neglecting to establish pure and correct Islaamic belief. What, your Eminence, do you have to say about this manhaj?
Answer: The call to unite the Muslims is, whichever way you look at it, a good thing and very important and there is a pressing need for it. However, if knowledge and correct understanding of religion and the tenets of faith accompany it, then this is more complete and more obligatory. This is because their uniting upon incorrect tenets of belief does not satisfy, nor fulfil what is required and does not benefit them greatly. It is therefore necessary that the method of inviting is complete.
It should be to unity and to holding firmly to the Rope of Allaah and adherence to His Religion while stressing the importance of correct belief. This is how the Messenger, prayers and peace be upon him, and his noble companions (radi-'Allaahu 'anhum) proceeded so that the method of inviting might be comprehensive and complete.
This is not about voting, the sheikh is talking about unity of muslim minorities on the rope of Allah not on the rope of democracy
@@cabdiraxmaan3754 what on earth are you taking about my brother? This is supplemental to the video that when a necessity arises then certain actions become 'permissible' not halal due the circumstances people are facing. Don't look at the surface of what the scholars have said but look at the foundation of how they came to this conclusion.
@@0bserver249 U have no fatwa from sheikh ibnu baz to suppprt your Calling of shirk. There is no point of collecting unrealted fatwa to your topic
@@cabdiraxmaan3754 lol read the other fatwas my brother, the scholars have a solution of sorts to the issues, they are but also the what is happening.be good salaam
@@0bserver249 If I agree on scholars in tahliil or tahreem I am worshipimg them
إتخذو احبارهم ورهبانهم اربابا من دون الله
When you elect a legislator u making false God ( taghut) who will legislate other than what Allah has revealed.
May Allah guide you.
If you don’t vote arnt you helping oppressors to win by not voting against them for someone with better policies
Not every vote is shirk
Why did your families come to Europe if you hate their laws and culture? Don't be hypocrites.
Just go out and vote man 😅
Assalamu alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatu if you cant pra your religion you should try make hijrah if you have the means.
Allaah is sufficient for the believer's Al Hamdu Lillaah.
Voting still feels doubtful. Wallahu alum. Those who vote that's up to them. Those who dont thats up to him.
Just the politician's are kniwn liars and i dont see any of them truthful.
I have a feeling he will say it is halal to vote for Taghut.
And what makes you say that?
In our deen, we're not meant to have negative assumptions about our brothers and sisters
Laah yajuz vote haram
You sound like the ones who support isis, am i right?
Since when is the elected position called taghut in UK 😂
Alhamdullilaah. I am from Ghana. May increase you in taqwa and steadfastness in the deen.
These people live in an alternative world i swear .....
Do not vote. Shaykh Al Albaani said the principle of lesser of two evils in legislative elections is falsehood, because kufr is one religion and the legislative process is part of their kufr, so voting in their process is like taking the disbelievers as allies in actions.
Albaanis words not mine.
Al-Albani is a great scholar. however, his fatwa is not an evidence. It seems that Abu Taymiyyah is giving strong evidence from the other camp of scholars who gave a different fatwa.
Assalamu Alaikom Akh The Brother already mentions the "Fatwa changes because of the Time & Place", u need to listen to the Video at 3:16.
and Allah knows best
@@yaseenpirzadah2767did you not watch the video ? Wallahi you people only listen to what you want to hear
@@yaseenpirzadah2767The salafi brothers blindly follow the same group of scholars on everything. They simply do not consider opinions from scholars outside of that circle
Albaani didn't give credence to the principles that Abu Taymiyyah or the other ulema cited, because he sees this as an issue of Tawheed and Imaan and rightly so, because he understood the elements of Kufr involved. Albaani discredited any view of the lesser of two evils or benefits and harms in the issue of legislative elections because it is directly connected to the disbelief of the disbelievers.. which doesn't compromise based on circumstances until the kufr itself is removed from the process which it isn't. Those Ulema are mistaken or were talking about a circumstance where Kufr isn't part of the innate structure of the election.
This is like me telling the teacher on the day of the exam, only Allah can test me😂
If we Muslims don't participate in our political system, then laws will be written with zero muslim input and enforced with zero muslim input.
Only in a democratic country can a Muslim question their ruler, try that in UAE or Saudi Arabia and see where that gets you.
Democracy is a beautiful thing.
Kufr statement audoubillah democracy will never be beautiful to us
@@Ms72372 I hear Afghanistan and Iran are lovely places to live, I hope you're not living in the filthy west.
I live in a country where I as a Muslim can even critic the prime minister on the street to his face without fear of persecution. I live in a country where I can choose to be a practicing Muslim, or a non-practicing Muslim, and no one would care or judge me for it. Alhamdulilah I'm grateful for the UK, and for democracy
Allah won't organise your bin collection.
3. The Permanent Committee (al-Lajnah ad-Daa'imah)
Source: Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, 23/407:
Question: Is it permissible for Muslims who live in secular countries to form Islamic parties, which will be official parties within the framework of the law, but whose aim will be to call people to Allaah?
Answer: Praise be to Allaah. It is prescribed for Muslims who are living in non-muslim states to unite, to form bonds amongst themselves and cooperate with one another, whether that is in the name of Islamic parties or Islamic organizations, because that is a kind of cooperating in righteousness and piety.
And Allaah is the Source of strength. May Allaah send blessings and peace upon our Prophet Muhammad and his family and companions.
Doesn't mention anything about taking part in a secular democracy.
@@mhmd_old7 my brother, show me a democracy that for the most part isn't secular? Understand the fatwas in conjunction with the video and the message that the Ustaadh is trying to teach
@@0bserver249*FROM THE 10 NULLIFIERS OF ISLAM: NULLIFIERS NUMBER 4️⃣&8️⃣ BOTH HAVE MINOR AS WELL AS MAJOR KUFR CATEGORIES & MUST ALWAYS BE INVESTIGATED BY THE SALAFI ULAMA☝🏻😎🇸🇦🕋🕌DEBUNKING KHAWARIJ isis alqaeda ikhwanul mufliseen fanboys & fangirls:🤚🏻STOP MISQUOTING THE SAHIH HADITH TO FULFIL YOUR IKHWANI KHARIJI TAKFEERI AGENDA OF CRITICIZING RULERS🔥THE HADITH SAYS SPEAKING A WORD OF TRUTH IN FRONT OF THE RULER (MEANING IN HIS OWN PERSONAL CHAMBER ACCORDING TO VARIOUS OTHER SAHIH HADITHS)🔥NOT CRITICIZING RULERS ON PULPITS OR OTHER PUBLIC PLATFORMS SUCH AS TV, social media etc.🔥ALSO EDUCATE YOURSELF🔥EVEN A SINFUL MUSLIM CAN BE A TAGHOOT🔥NOT ALL TAWAGHEET ARE KUFFAR🔥ALL KUFFAR ARE TAWAGHEET BUT ALL TAWAGHEET ARE NOT NECESSARILY KUFFAR🔥JUST LIKE EVERY TYPE OF SHIRK (MAJOR OR MINOR) IS HARAM BUT EVERY TYPE OF HARAM IS NOT NECESSARILY SHIRK🔥THE 5 HEADS OF TAGHOOT ALSO INCLUDE THE 1 WHO TAKES BRIBES🔥AN INNOVATOR🔥SO ACCORDING TO YOU EVERY INNOVATOR WILL BE A DISBELIEVER⁉️EVERY BRIBER WILL BE A DISBELIEVER U JAAHIL⁉️EDUCATE YOURSELF*
*ITS FARD COMPULSORY FOR EVERY MUSLIM TO HATE SHIRK & KUFR & ALSO HATE THE MUSHRIKEEN & KUFFAR BCUZ OF THEIR SHIRK & KUFR🔥🔥WHOEVER LACKS THE ABOVE✋🏻DOES NOT HAVE AL WALA WAL BARA i.e. ALLEGIANCE & DISAVOWAL (LOVE & HATRED) FOR THE SAKE OF ALLAH☝🏻😎🤲🏻🇸🇦🕋✅ALLYING WITH THE KUFFAR IS KUFR ASGHAR (minor kufr) BUT CAN ALSO BE KUFR AKBAR (MAJOR KUFR WITH CONDITION OF THE HEART THAT IS UNKNOWN & MUST BE INQUIRED)🔥ON THE OTHER HAND PEACE TREATIES WITH KUFFAR IS PERFECTLY HALAL BCUZ PROPHET MUHAMMADﷺ HAD PEACE TREATIES WITH THE KUFFAR🔥PROPHET MUHAMMADﷺ EVEN SAID WE WILL TAKE HELP OF THE KUFFAR IN JIHAD AGAINST A COMMON ENEMY🔥SUBHANALLAH☝🏻WHAT WILL isis alqaeda nusra bokoharam etc🔥TAKFEERIS GIVE THE FATWA ON MUHAMMADﷺ NOW⁉️Yes 1 of the treaties were broken unilaterally by THE MUSHRIKS of Makkah🔥SO SURAH TAWBAH WAS REVEALED☝🏻Even if it was broken🔥It does NOT make peace treaties KUFR OR HARAM🔥✋🏻SAUDI ARABIA BANS ISRAEL TRADE BUT HAS PEACE TREATIES WITH USA & TRADES WITH USA🔥NOTHING HARAM IN TRADING PRODUCTS WITH NONMUSLIM COUNTRIES🔥EVEN IF THEY TRADE WEAPONS✅NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT✅THE KHAWARIJ isis alqaeda nusra etc🔥PUT TAKFEER ON SAUDI GOVERNMENT FOR TRADING WEAPONS WITH USA🔥BUT PROPHET MUHAMMADﷺ LITERALLY SAID:U WILL FIGHT ALONGSIDE KUFFAR AGAINST A COMMON KAAFIR ENEMY IN JIHAD✅SO THAT HADITH REFUTES THE KHAWARIJ TAKFEERIS✅ALSO WEAPONRY ARE 1 OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ASSETS OF ANY NATION✅FOR ITS ARMY & DEFENSE✅IF U DONT HAVE HEAVY POWERFUL WEAPONS🔥HOW CAN U DEFEND YOUR COUNTRY AGAINST UNEXPECTED AMBUSHES & TERRORIST ATTACKS⁉️SO ALHUMDULILLAH ISLAM IS PERFECT✅Treachery or treason are all punishable by death under Islamic court of Law & also USA🔥& 1 of the main forms of treachery is Ridda🔥Apostasy🔥AMERICAN SUGARCOATERS WEST INFATUATED LIBERALIZED JAAHIL MUSLIMS KEEP SAYING:"DEATH PENALTY IS ONLY IF AN APOSTATE COMMITS TREASON AGAINST GOVERNMENT BLAH BLAH"🔥BUT WE HAVE NUMEROUS NARRATIONS THAT APOSTASY IS PUNISHED BY DEATH IN ISLAM✅THESE LIBERALS ARE ON THE VERGE OF KUFR DANGLING ON THE FENCE WALLAH REJECTING AUTHENTIC NARRATIONS OF RASOOLULLAHﷺ✅ALSO APOSTASY ITSELF IS THE BIGGEST FORM OF TREASON🔥If treason against a human probably temporary government is punishable by death penalty🔥THEN WHAT ABOUT TREASON AGAINST ALLAH THE KING OF ALL KINGS⁉️THE CREATOR OF THE WHOLE UNIVERSE ⁉️THAT'S THE BIGGEST TREASON SUBHANALLAH✅SO APOSTASY IS FAR MORE LEGIBLE FOR DEATH PENALTY THAN TREASON AGAINST A GOVERNMENT OR MAN MADE CONSITUTIONS LIKE USA EUROPE ETC🔥May Allah guide these JAAHIL liberals SUGARCOATERS of Islam AMEEN*
6️⃣ *MAJOR KUFR1️⃣ISTIHLAAL⛔BELIEVING & SAYING CLEARLY THAT 1 OR MORE HARAM/PROHIBITIONS IN ISLAM IS HALAL SUCH AS ALCOHOL GAMBLING DRUGS PORK ZINA MURDER STEALING ETC2️⃣JUHOOD⛔CLEARLY & VERBALLY REJECTING ALLAH'S LAWS BUT NOT IN HIS HEART (Like Firaun/Pharaoh VERBALLY REJECTED MUSA ALAIHISALAM BUT believed in his heart THAT Musa ALAIHISALAM was upon the Haq/Truth)3️⃣TAKZEEB⛔️CLEARLY & VERBALLY REJECTING ALLAH'S LAWS BOTH VERBALLY AS WELL AS IN HIS HEART i.e. BOTH EXTERNALLY AS WELL AS INTERNALLY4️⃣TAFDEEL⛔BELIEVING & SAYING CLEARLY THAT MAN MADE LAWS ARE SUPERIOR TO ALLAH'S LAWS5️⃣MUSAWAAT⛔️BELIEVING & SAYING CLEARLY THAT MAN MADE LAWS & ALLAH'S LAWS ARE EQUAL6️⃣TABDEEL⛔RULING BY MAN MADE LAWS & CLEARLY & VERBALLY ASCRIBING THEM TO ALLAH🔥🔥🔥3️⃣MINOR KUFR7️⃣Istibdaal🚯RULING BY MAN MADE LAWS WITHOUT ASCRIBING THEM TO ALLAH8️⃣Taqneen🚯COMING UP WITH A NEW LAW9️⃣Tashree' 'Aam🚯GENERAL MAN MADE LEGISLATION & ENFORCEMENT ON PUBLIC*
*THE JUDGEMENT OF ALLAH COVERS EVERYONE, NOT JUST THE MUSLIM RULERS✅MAY ALLAH GUIDE & PROTECT ALL MUSLIM RULERS AMEEN✅EVERY MUSLIM IS A SINNER & HE/SHE JUDGES BY OTHER THAN ALLAH'S LAWS THROUGH HIS SINS EVERY DAY JUST LIKE ANY RULER OR HUMAN BEING BCUZ NOBODY IS PERFECT LIKE ANGELS✅WHENEVER WE SIN🔥WE JUDGE BY OUR NAFS/EGO &/OR SHAYTAAN'S WHISPERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY NOT ALLAH'S JUDGEMENT✅🔥THAT IS 100% JUDGING BY OTHER THAN ALLAH & ITS NOT KUFR AKBAR TO JUDGE BY OTHER THAN ALLAH UNLESS IT CLEARLY AND VERBALLY FALLS UNDER THE 6 CATEGORIES OF MAJOR KUFR:1️⃣ISTIHLAAL (CLEARLY & VERBALLY SAYING THE HARAM MAN MADE LAWS ARE HALAL)2️⃣TABDEEL (CLEARLY & VERBALLY ATTRIBUTING MAN MADE LAWS TO ALLAH & JUDGING BY THEM)3️⃣TAFDEEL (CLEARLY & VERBALLY SAYING MAN MADE LAWS ARE SUPERIOR OR BETTER THAN ALLAH'S LAWS)4️⃣MUSAWAAT (CLEARLY & VERBALLY SAYING MAN MADE LAWS ARE EQUAL TO ALLAH'S LAWS)5️⃣JUHOOD (CLEARLY JUDGING BY OTHER THAN ALLAH'S LAWS EXTERNALLY WITH CLEAR PROVEN ARROGANCE IN HEART & ACTIONS AGAINST ALLAH LIKE FIRAUN WHO BELIEVED THAT MUSA ALAIHISALAM'S LAW OF TORAH WAS RIGHT BUT ARROGANTLY REJECTED & OPPOSED IT WITH HIS TONGUE & ACTIONS) & FINALLY6️⃣TAKZEEB (CLEARLY & VERBALLY REJECTING ALLAH'S LAWS BOTH INTERNALLY IN HIS HEART AS WELL AS EXTERNALLY WITH HIS TONGUE & ACTIONS)*
*THIS IS WHAT THE SALAFI KIBAARUL ULAMA ALSO MENTIONED SO U SHOULD FEAR ALLAH & STOP SUPER IMPOSING YOUR DEFINITIONS ON THE CLEAR CUT IJMA OF THE SALAFUSSALIHEEN & ALL THOSE WHO FOLLOW THE RIGHTEOUS SALAFI AQEEDAH & MANHAJ*
@@0bserver249*_THE KHAWARIJ TERROR!STS NOT JUDGING WITH WHAT ALLAH HAS REVEALED🔥Ismailbin Sad said:I asked ImamAhmad about:وَمَنْ لَمْ يَحْكُمْ بِمَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ فَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْكَافِرُونَ & whosoever DOES NOT JUDGE by what Allah has revealed, such are the Kafirun (i.e. disbelievers of a lesser degree as they do not act on Allah’s Laws✅️Quran 5:44✅️I asked:What is this type of Kufr⁉️He said:The Kufr that does NOT take a person out of the Ummah✅️Swalat Ibn Hani 2/192✅️Ibn alJawzi said:أن من لم يحكم بما أنزل الله جاحداً له، فهو كافر، ومن لم يحكم به ميلاً إلى الهوى من غير جحود؛فهو ظالم فاسق That whoever did not judge with what Allah has revealed arrogantly REJECTING it then he is a Kafir & the 1 who did not judge with what Allah has revealed inclining to following desires WITHOUT REJECTING it then he is an evil oppressive person✅️Zad alMaseer 2/366✅️In the early period of Islam, they declared AliBinAbiTalib to be a KAFIR when he intended to reconcile with Mu’awiyah✅️Ubaidullah ibn Abu Rafi reported:The Kharijites came out against Ali ibn Abi Talib & they said لَا حُكْمَ إِلَّا لِلَّهِ There is no rule (ḥukm) but for Allah. (_**_12:40_**_) Ali may Allah be pleased with him said:كَلِمَةُ حَقٍّ أُرِيدَ بِهَا بَاطِلٌ A word of truth by which is intended falsehood✅️Sahih Muslim 1066✅️Sahih✅️Imam Shatabee said about:وَمَنْ لَمْ يَحْكُمْ بِمَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ فَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْكَافِرُونَ ✅️& whosoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed‼️such are the Kafirun (i.e. disbelievers of a lesser degree as they do not act on Allah’s Laws✅️Quran 5:44 “هذه الآية والآيتان بعدها نزلت في الكفار، ومن غيّر حكم الله من اليهود، وليس في أهل الإسلام منها شيء؛ لأن المسلم -وإن ارتكب كبيرة- لا يقال له: كافر. This Ayah & the 2 Ayat after it were revealed about the KUFFAR & about those who changed the judgement of Allah from among the JEWS🔥It has NOTHING to do with the people of Islam whatsoever BECAUSE if a Muslim even if he committed a major sin, it cannot be said about him that he is a Kāfir✅️[AlMuwafaqat 4/39]✅️Shaykh ul Islam Ibn Taymeeyah said about:وَمَنْ لَمْ يَحْكُمْ بِمَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ فَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْكَافِرُونَ✅️& whosoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed, such are the Kafirun (i.e. disbelievers of a LESSER DEGREE as they do not act on Allah’s Laws✅️Quran 5:44_*
*_أن الإمام أحمد -رحمه الله- سئل عن الكفر المذكور في آية الحكم؛ فقال: “كفر لا ينقل عن الملة؛ ؛ مثل الإيمان بعضه دون بعض، فكذلك الكفر، حتى يجيء من ذلك أمر لا يختلف فيه”._*
*_ImamAhmad was asked about the type of KUFR mentioned in the Ayah of judging & he said✅️THIS IS THE KUFR WHICH DOES NOT take a person out of the Ummah; just as some parts of EMAN are lesser AND the same is for KUFR, until there appears a matter of which there is no difference of opinion in✅️Majmoo alFatawa 7/2541️⃣BCUZ they left the correct way & this has been testified by the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, as the Khawarij interpreted the Ayat with the wrong explanation. This is what innovators do & this is the door through which they enter2️⃣BCUZ they exaggerated concerning the rulings of the Quran & the Sunnah & they exaggerated excessively✅️Ibn Umar on Rebels:The Khawarij apply verses about disbelievers against Muslims✅️AlBukhari reported: Ibn Umar RADIALLAHHUANHU considered the Khawārij rebels to be the worst of Allah’s creation & he said:“Verily they take verses that were revealed about UNBELIEVERS & use them against the BELIEVERS✅️Sahih Bukhari 6531_*
*_عن البخاري وَكَانَ ابْنُ عُمَرَ رضي الله عنه يَرَاهُمْ شِرَارَ خَلْقِ اللَّهِ وَقَالَ إِنَّهُمْ انْطَلَقُوا إِلَى آيَاتٍ نَزَلَتْ فِي الْكُفَّارِ فَجَعَلُوهَا عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ6531 صحيح البخاري كتاب استتابة المرتدين والمعاندين وقتالهم باب قتل الخوارج والملحدين بعد إقامة الحجة عليهم_*
*_Imam al-Baghawi (d516 AH/1122 CE) Rahimahullah mentioned in Ma'alim utTanzil vol 3 p61:IbnAbbas & Tawus stated:It is NOT the kufr which expels one from the Religion✅️Rather if one does it then he is a disbeliever, yet he is not like the one who disbelieves in Allāh & the Last Day✅️Shaykh'ul Islam Ibn Taymiyah (d. 728 AH/1328 CE) rahimahullah, stated in MajmuAlFatawa vol 7 p312:Therefore from the statements of the Salaf were:A person can have within him both īmān & kufr" & likewise within their saying: "that one can have within him both īmān & kufr, it is not the kufr which expels one from the Religion." Just as IbnAbbas & his companions (students) stated in regards to the saying of Allāh:"And whoever does not judge by what Allāh Has Revealed‼️then it is those who are disbelievers✅️Quran 5:44✅️They said it means: "They disbelieved with a type of kufr which does not expel one from the Religion" & Ahmad & other Imāms of the Sunnah followed him in that✅️Ibn Taymiyyah also said in MajmuAlFatawa vol 7, p522:IbnAbbas & others from the Salaf stated in regards to Allāh's saying:Whoever does not rule by what Allah Has Revealed, then they are the disbelievers✅️Quran 5:44✅️Whoever does not rule by what Allāh Has Revealed, then they are the transgressors✅️_**_5:45_**_ ✅️Whoever does not rule by what Allāh Has Revealed, then they are the sinful✅️_**_5:47_**_✅️It is:🔥"kufr less than kufr, fisq less than fisq & dhulm less than dhulm✅️Imams Ahmad, Bukhari & others mentioned this✅️IbnTaymiyyah also said in MajmuAlFatawa, vol 7 p350-351:"He could be Muslim yet within him is kufr less than kufr which does not expel him from Islām absolutely, as the Companions said, such as IbnAbbas & others: "kufr less than kufr" this is the saying of the generality of the Salaf and this is what Ahmad and others documented. This is also what al-Bukhārī bore testimony to in is Sahih✅️(Refer to: Imam Bukhari's chaptering in his Sahīh:Chapter:Kufr Towards Spouses & Kufr Less than Kufr.' Al Qādī Ibn al-'Arabī al-Mālikī stated in Fath ul Bārī, vol 1 p83:"The intent of the classifier (i.e. al-Bukhārī) is to explain that acts of obedience are named 'īmān' and likewise acts of disobedience are named 'kufr'. However, when kufr is applied in this instance the intent is not the kufr which expels from the Religion.")✅️A Study of the Tafsir of Ibn 'Abbās: Kufr Dūna Kufr_*
*_The best of your rulers are those whom you love & they love you, who pray for you & you pray for them. The worst of your rulers are those whom you hate & they hate you, whom you curse & they curse you✅️It was said “Shall we confront them with swords?” The Prophet said:_*
*_لَا مَا أَقَامُوا فِيكُمْ الصَّلَاةَ وَإِذَا رَأَيْتُمْ مِنْ وُلَاتِكُمْ شَيْئًا تَكْرَهُونَهُ فَاكْرَهُوا عَمَلَهُ وَلَا تَنْزِعُوا يَدًا مِنْ طَاعَةٍ_*
*_No🔥as long as they establish prayer among you. If you find something hateful from them, you should hate their actions BUT NOT withdraw your hand from obedience✅️SAHIH MUSLIM 1855✅️SAHIH_*
London - I advise everyone to vote for Niko Omilana
Not niko😂
naudhubillah
*FROM THE 10 NULLIFIERS OF ISLAM: NULLIFIERS NUMBER 4️⃣&8️⃣ BOTH HAVE MINOR AS WELL AS MAJOR KUFR CATEGORIES & MUST ALWAYS BE INVESTIGATED BY THE SALAFI ULAMA☝🏻😎🇸🇦🕋🕌DEBUNKING KHAWARIJ isis alqaeda ikhwanul mufliseen fanboys & fangirls:🤚🏻STOP MISQUOTING THE SAHIH HADITH TO FULFIL YOUR IKHWANI KHARIJI TAKFEERI AGENDA OF CRITICIZING RULERS🔥THE HADITH SAYS SPEAKING A WORD OF TRUTH IN FRONT OF THE RULER (MEANING IN HIS OWN PERSONAL CHAMBER ACCORDING TO VARIOUS OTHER SAHIH HADITHS)🔥NOT CRITICIZING RULERS ON PULPITS OR OTHER PUBLIC PLATFORMS SUCH AS TV, social media etc.🔥ALSO EDUCATE YOURSELF🔥EVEN A SINFUL MUSLIM CAN BE A TAGHOOT🔥NOT ALL TAWAGHEET ARE KUFFAR🔥ALL KUFFAR ARE TAWAGHEET BUT ALL TAWAGHEET ARE NOT NECESSARILY KUFFAR🔥JUST LIKE EVERY TYPE OF SHIRK (MAJOR OR MINOR) IS HARAM BUT EVERY TYPE OF HARAM IS NOT NECESSARILY SHIRK🔥THE 5 HEADS OF TAGHOOT ALSO INCLUDE THE 1 WHO TAKES BRIBES🔥AN INNOVATOR🔥SO ACCORDING TO YOU EVERY INNOVATOR WILL BE A DISBELIEVER⁉️EVERY BRIBER WILL BE A DISBELIEVER U JAAHIL⁉️EDUCATE YOURSELF*
*ITS FARD COMPULSORY FOR EVERY MUSLIM TO HATE SHIRK & KUFR & ALSO HATE THE MUSHRIKEEN & KUFFAR BCUZ OF THEIR SHIRK & KUFR🔥🔥WHOEVER LACKS THE ABOVE✋🏻DOES NOT HAVE AL WALA WAL BARA i.e. ALLEGIANCE & DISAVOWAL (LOVE & HATRED) FOR THE SAKE OF ALLAH☝🏻😎🤲🏻🇸🇦🕋✅ALLYING WITH THE KUFFAR IS KUFR ASGHAR (minor kufr) BUT CAN ALSO BE KUFR AKBAR (MAJOR KUFR WITH CONDITION OF THE HEART THAT IS UNKNOWN & MUST BE INQUIRED)🔥ON THE OTHER HAND PEACE TREATIES WITH KUFFAR IS PERFECTLY HALAL BCUZ PROPHET MUHAMMADﷺ HAD PEACE TREATIES WITH THE KUFFAR🔥PROPHET MUHAMMADﷺ EVEN SAID WE WILL TAKE HELP OF THE KUFFAR IN JIHAD AGAINST A COMMON ENEMY🔥SUBHANALLAH☝🏻WHAT WILL isis alqaeda nusra bokoharam etc🔥TAKFEERIS GIVE THE FATWA ON MUHAMMADﷺ NOW⁉️Yes 1 of the treaties were broken unilaterally by THE MUSHRIKS of Makkah🔥SO SURAH TAWBAH WAS REVEALED☝🏻Even if it was broken🔥It does NOT make peace treaties KUFR OR HARAM🔥✋🏻SAUDI ARABIA BANS ISRAEL TRADE BUT HAS PEACE TREATIES WITH USA & TRADES WITH USA🔥NOTHING HARAM IN TRADING PRODUCTS WITH NONMUSLIM COUNTRIES🔥EVEN IF THEY TRADE WEAPONS✅NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT✅THE KHAWARIJ isis alqaeda nusra etc🔥PUT TAKFEER ON SAUDI GOVERNMENT FOR TRADING WEAPONS WITH USA🔥BUT PROPHET MUHAMMADﷺ LITERALLY SAID:U WILL FIGHT ALONGSIDE KUFFAR AGAINST A COMMON KAAFIR ENEMY IN JIHAD✅SO THAT HADITH REFUTES THE KHAWARIJ TAKFEERIS✅ALSO WEAPONRY ARE 1 OF THE MOST IMPORTANT ASSETS OF ANY NATION✅FOR ITS ARMY & DEFENSE✅IF U DONT HAVE HEAVY POWERFUL WEAPONS🔥HOW CAN U DEFEND YOUR COUNTRY AGAINST UNEXPECTED AMBUSHES & TERRORIST ATTACKS⁉️SO ALHUMDULILLAH ISLAM IS PERFECT✅Treachery or treason are all punishable by death under Islamic court of Law & also USA🔥& 1 of the main forms of treachery is Ridda🔥Apostasy🔥AMERICAN SUGARCOATERS WEST INFATUATED LIBERALIZED JAAHIL MUSLIMS KEEP SAYING:"DEATH PENALTY IS ONLY IF AN APOSTATE COMMITS TREASON AGAINST GOVERNMENT BLAH BLAH"🔥BUT WE HAVE NUMEROUS NARRATIONS THAT APOSTASY IS PUNISHED BY DEATH IN ISLAM✅THESE LIBERALS ARE ON THE VERGE OF KUFR DANGLING ON THE FENCE WALLAH REJECTING AUTHENTIC NARRATIONS OF RASOOLULLAHﷺ✅ALSO APOSTASY ITSELF IS THE BIGGEST FORM OF TREASON🔥If treason against a human probably temporary government is punishable by death penalty🔥THEN WHAT ABOUT TREASON AGAINST ALLAH THE KING OF ALL KINGS⁉️THE CREATOR OF THE WHOLE UNIVERSE ⁉️THAT'S THE BIGGEST TREASON SUBHANALLAH✅SO APOSTASY IS FAR MORE LEGIBLE FOR DEATH PENALTY THAN TREASON AGAINST A GOVERNMENT OR MAN MADE CONSITUTIONS LIKE USA EUROPE ETC🔥May Allah guide these JAAHIL liberals SUGARCOATERS of Islam AMEEN*
6️⃣ *MAJOR KUFR1️⃣ISTIHLAAL⛔BELIEVING & SAYING CLEARLY THAT 1 OR MORE HARAM/PROHIBITIONS IN ISLAM IS HALAL SUCH AS ALCOHOL GAMBLING DRUGS PORK ZINA MURDER STEALING ETC2️⃣JUHOOD⛔CLEARLY & VERBALLY REJECTING ALLAH'S LAWS BUT NOT IN HIS HEART (Like Firaun/Pharaoh VERBALLY REJECTED MUSA ALAIHISALAM BUT believed in his heart THAT Musa ALAIHISALAM was upon the Haq/Truth)3️⃣TAKZEEB⛔️CLEARLY & VERBALLY REJECTING ALLAH'S LAWS BOTH VERBALLY AS WELL AS IN HIS HEART i.e. BOTH EXTERNALLY AS WELL AS INTERNALLY4️⃣TAFDEEL⛔BELIEVING & SAYING CLEARLY THAT MAN MADE LAWS ARE SUPERIOR TO ALLAH'S LAWS5️⃣MUSAWAAT⛔️BELIEVING & SAYING CLEARLY THAT MAN MADE LAWS & ALLAH'S LAWS ARE EQUAL6️⃣TABDEEL⛔RULING BY MAN MADE LAWS & CLEARLY & VERBALLY ASCRIBING THEM TO ALLAH🔥🔥🔥3️⃣MINOR KUFR7️⃣Istibdaal🚯RULING BY MAN MADE LAWS WITHOUT ASCRIBING THEM TO ALLAH8️⃣Taqneen🚯COMING UP WITH A NEW LAW9️⃣Tashree' 'Aam🚯GENERAL MAN MADE LEGISLATION & ENFORCEMENT ON PUBLIC*
*THE JUDGEMENT OF ALLAH COVERS EVERYONE, NOT JUST THE MUSLIM RULERS✅MAY ALLAH GUIDE & PROTECT ALL MUSLIM RULERS AMEEN✅EVERY MUSLIM IS A SINNER & HE/SHE JUDGES BY OTHER THAN ALLAH'S LAWS THROUGH HIS SINS EVERY DAY JUST LIKE ANY RULER OR HUMAN BEING BCUZ NOBODY IS PERFECT LIKE ANGELS✅WHENEVER WE SIN🔥WE JUDGE BY OUR NAFS/EGO &/OR SHAYTAAN'S WHISPERS WHICH ARE CLEARLY NOT ALLAH'S JUDGEMENT✅🔥THAT IS 100% JUDGING BY OTHER THAN ALLAH & ITS NOT KUFR AKBAR TO JUDGE BY OTHER THAN ALLAH UNLESS IT CLEARLY AND VERBALLY FALLS UNDER THE 6 CATEGORIES OF MAJOR KUFR:1️⃣ISTIHLAAL (CLEARLY & VERBALLY SAYING THE HARAM MAN MADE LAWS ARE HALAL)2️⃣TABDEEL (CLEARLY & VERBALLY ATTRIBUTING MAN MADE LAWS TO ALLAH & JUDGING BY THEM)3️⃣TAFDEEL (CLEARLY & VERBALLY SAYING MAN MADE LAWS ARE SUPERIOR OR BETTER THAN ALLAH'S LAWS)4️⃣MUSAWAAT (CLEARLY & VERBALLY SAYING MAN MADE LAWS ARE EQUAL TO ALLAH'S LAWS)5️⃣JUHOOD (CLEARLY JUDGING BY OTHER THAN ALLAH'S LAWS EXTERNALLY WITH CLEAR PROVEN ARROGANCE IN HEART & ACTIONS AGAINST ALLAH LIKE FIRAUN WHO BELIEVED THAT MUSA ALAIHISALAM'S LAW OF TORAH WAS RIGHT BUT ARROGANTLY REJECTED & OPPOSED IT WITH HIS TONGUE & ACTIONS) & FINALLY6️⃣TAKZEEB (CLEARLY & VERBALLY REJECTING ALLAH'S LAWS BOTH INTERNALLY IN HIS HEART AS WELL AS EXTERNALLY WITH HIS TONGUE & ACTIONS)*
*THIS IS WHAT THE SALAFI KIBAARUL ULAMA ALSO MENTIONED SO U SHOULD FEAR ALLAH & STOP SUPER IMPOSING YOUR DEFINITIONS ON THE CLEAR CUT IJMA OF THE SALAFUSSALIHEEN & ALL THOSE WHO FOLLOW THE RIGHTEOUS SALAFI AQEEDAH & MANHAJ*
thank you for a relevant topic
You shouldn't even be able to vote
Exactly. These clowns need to understand that voting is a privilege. If you wanna waste that privilege, then just go back to your Islamic dictatorships.
Crazy muslim please engarage to vote this election other wish all myslim retrun owen country
I think the issue may be that more that of whether or not democracy is allowed as opposed to merely just voting. Even in Saudi Arabia, voting is allowed on the municipal level: in other Muslim countries It includes regional and national elections. I live in the United States and I think the answer is fluid, not just a One solution fits all type of situation. For instance.
In the past I participated in presidential election whereas now I do not, primarily because It is obvious the elected candidate, whether democratic or Republican, whether black or white, will essentially enforce the same policies in favor of US national interests, regardless of whether these policies are right or wrong. Now, as a Muslim in the United States and an African American, to say as a whole The issue of voting is not allowed on a local basis is not necessarily wise. That is because I know that as a Muslim and as an African American I live in a town or an area where the presence or absence of my vote may make the difference between whether or not an LGBT candidate makes the school board or city council in a predominantly African-American District wherein there candidates intent is clearly to gentrify this
Predominantly African American district, (which by the way also contains a sizeable Muslim community). So do you just sit back and let these people with these agendas take over the community through a lack of voting and therefore, they enforce their immoral agendas upon everybody and also gentrified the people out of the neighborhood (and that includes by the way a mosque which was effectively zoned Out of the downtown area as it was reclassified as a business district), Or in cases like this do the muslim residents of that town district vote with the intent of supporting a candidate Who will prevent this type of agenda and have their besr interests in mind? I am neither a scholar nor a student of knowledge but I say based upon these type of situations the issue of voting is fluid as opposed to set in stone. In some major cities of the United States such as Newark and Philadelphia there are sizeable Muslim minorities enough to easily influence the election and sway the given political direction if all the Muslims in that municipality vote in one bloc.
I think the comment section has made clear that some do not have this level of thinking required to understand how ulama come to rulings. All emotion, no understanding.
Most of the people in the comments live in the West and are aware that the lesser evil does not exist there because, in general, there are always two distinct ideologies: a conservative, racist, Islamophobic party and a progressive party (LGBT-friendly, feminism...), humanist, which wants to make us believe they have no problem with Islam when ideologically they are our greatest enemies. The scholars are not aware of these realities.
from morocco baraka allah fik
8. Shaikh WaseeUllaah Àbbaas.
Reference: Recording done with the Shaikh's permission on January 24th, 2007 (5 Muharram 1428):
The following question, from America, is about voting for those it is believed will benefit the Muslims. We are not asking about a Muslim entering into an election as a candidate, nor are we concerned about Federal elections. Rather, the question is about voting in local elections for those who have the authority to delegate plots of land to the Muslims, abandoned buildings, and other such benefits. If the Muslims don't vote for them, other groups will and, therefore, acquire these benefits. So, may Allah reward you well dear Shaikh, do you have any advice in this matter?
Shaikh: That which appears correct to me, insha'Allah, is that if some good is anticipated as a result of voting, then we vote. We vote for the candidate as long as he is presently benefiting the Muslims or promises to benefit the Muslims in the future, even if he is not a Muslim. It would be inappropriate for the Muslims to refrain from voting for this individual, especially if the leader of the Muslims can dictate terms, conditions, and other stipulations on him as a result of the Muslims voting. For example, the leader of the Muslims says, "We will vote for you on the condition that you support our interests, mention them to your superiors, etc." And this applies in any country where the Muslims are a minority, not just in America.
By voting the Muslims may gain needed influence over politicians and other authorities. In return, these politicians and authorities may do something that will benefit Islam and the Muslims. This is especially the case in local elections where, as you have mentioned, the one who wins may have the authority to give away plots of lands on which schools can be built. I am familiar with this because it is even practiced in India. In this instance, it is not befitting in the least for the Muslims to hesitate or delay voting for these candidates.
The Muslims should not hesitate to vote because withholding their votes will not harm these candidates in the least. They will win by the votes of non-Muslims regardless if the Muslims vote or not. For this reason, the Muslims should use their vote as a favor to these candidates. As a result, the Muslims will be placed in an advantageous position of influence over these candidates. When they feel that they are indebted to the Muslims, the Muslims can benefit from their empathy and their sympathetic views and understanding of Muslim causes. This is a general Islamic benefit required by the Islamic public interests. This is our belief.
This is also the verdict given by our Shaikhs in India. Even Shaikh Bin Baaz (may Allah have mercy on him), from what we have heard, used to rule with the permissibility of participating in elections. And for this, insha'Allah, we hope from Allah a good future for the Muslims in every land. If this affair brings good to the Muslims then it's not befitting to hesitate.
Questioner: May Allah reward you with good. In order to bring about further benefit, dear Shaikh, for those who say that this action includes assisting one who rules by other than what Allah revealed...
Shaikh: This doesn't assist the one ruling by other than what Allah has revealed in view of the fact that if we don't vote, the [non-Muslims] will win by their own votes. They will be elected without a doubt. They will come into power by their own accord whether or not we isolate ourselves from them or from the entire world… Thus, this does not assist them in establishing non-Islamic laws. They are the rulers and the ones in authority in those lands whether we vote for them or not.
As a result, we should make an effort to influence them in a way that will be beneficial to Islam and the Muslims, insha'Allah.
Questioner: May Allah reward you with good dear Shaikh. Please excuse us for taking so much of your time.
Shaikh: May Allah reward you with good. I mention this with a clear conscience because we have heard our Shaikhs give this verdict, especially when it benefits the Muslims. This is also the case in India; some of the idol worshippers in the Parliament speak on behalf of the Muslims and their interests...and it is possible that Allah will aid the deen by using a disbeliever.
mushrik
Every Muslim should vote for those who will benefit the community the most.
It's halal go n vote on Thursday for independent MPs