How Jermain Defoe felt missing out on the 2006 World Cup to Theo Walcott | BBC Sounds

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 янв 2025

Комментарии •

  • @johnmitchell2269
    @johnmitchell2269 Год назад +10

    Walcott was 17 and had just finished one season in the Championship.

    • @MoanTheCelts
      @MoanTheCelts Год назад +3

      Years later, even in hindsight, Sven still thought he made the right call. Owen got injured so only Crouch as back up and Walcott didn’t play a second. I agree.

  • @chrisclarke8451
    @chrisclarke8451 Год назад +2

    Ultimately, the best team didn’t get picked and it cost us. So frustrating at the time

  • @finfog4590
    @finfog4590 Год назад +5

    I understand Sven’s thinking Walcott could be a wildcard. But he never even played him!

  • @mundojones6243
    @mundojones6243 Год назад +1

    Th strikers he took was an injured Owen, 18 year old Rooney (who got injured) , crouch and Walcott two of the top 5 English strikers of that year was Defoe and bent didn’t take any of them - if you think this made sense u know nothing about football

  • @andrewhyde4708
    @andrewhyde4708 10 месяцев назад

    Defoe was quality. He should have gone in 2006 and 2014!

    • @KendallCharles-vo4jl
      @KendallCharles-vo4jl 10 месяцев назад

      Hes black thats why

    • @calvinhicks1992
      @calvinhicks1992 10 месяцев назад +1

      @andrewhyde4708 Unfortunately Hodgson didn’t pick Defoe for 2014 as he’d gone to Toronto FC.

    • @rory4605
      @rory4605 4 месяца назад

      Yes brother!

    • @thf3038
      @thf3038 4 месяца назад

      @@calvinhicks1992 He'd also scored 1 PL goal in the 2013 calendar year which didn't help

    • @calvinhicks1992
      @calvinhicks1992 4 месяца назад

      @@thf3038 Very true

  • @Do27gg
    @Do27gg Год назад

    I get why he took Theo, at the time he was englands next big thing but still would feel so unfair

  • @MisterPete3
    @MisterPete3 Год назад +7

    To be honest, Walcott's career didn't even justify that selection. He was an average player at best

    • @helicoptergunship
      @helicoptergunship Год назад +3

      Facts. He had a bit of pace so everyone insisted he was the next henry, or even owen, but he was mediocre overall.

    • @kangaroo3708
      @kangaroo3708 Год назад +3

      @@helicoptergunship
      He scored over 100 goals for Arsenal in his career. He defiantly didn’t fulfil his potential but to say he was a mediocre player his whole career is nonsense.

    • @amarmann8341
      @amarmann8341 Год назад +5

      Hatred these days is crazy, even with his injuries he was above average

    • @kangaroo3708
      @kangaroo3708 Год назад

      @@amarmann8341
      He scored a 100 goals for arsenal.
      100 goals for the team as a winger.
      Ridiculous to call him average.

  • @trappinaintdeadyourjustsca5506
    @trappinaintdeadyourjustsca5506 Год назад +1

    Defoe is my jigga escobar and all that real one done bits for us

  • @TotalLoveformusic
    @TotalLoveformusic Год назад +1

    Disgraceful decision. The pain is still there now. It was ultimate fcukeries.

  • @muswentebanda9124
    @muswentebanda9124 Год назад +1

    This stupid decision by Sven probably cost us the WC ffs , Defoe could have grabbed a winner against the Portuguese

    • @guitarreilly
      @guitarreilly Год назад +1

      Total rubbish. We could barley beat Trinidad and Tobago. Awful from start to finish

  • @HamsaT12
    @HamsaT12 Год назад

    I always thought people going mad about Walcott being picked was an overreaction. Hardly any nation uses all 23 players in a tournament. there's always the starting 11 and like a core of 4 or 5 subs used. the rest stay on the bench or don't play significant minutes.
    It shouldn't have been that big of a deal.

    • @Edgisco
      @Edgisco Год назад +1

      By that logic just take 18 players then? It was wasteful

    • @HamsaT12
      @HamsaT12 Год назад

      @@Edgisco no because if you're given 23 slots, you should fill them all up. Most important in reality is filling up 17 or 18. The rest won't play significant minutes. Like if Defoe was picked and England were chasing the game, you wouldn't take off Rooney Or Owen would you?

    • @Edgisco
      @Edgisco Год назад

      @@HamsaT12 did you listen? Owen got injured and they could have used Defoe

    • @HamsaT12
      @HamsaT12 Год назад

      They had Rooney and Crouch. They were good enough.@@Edgisco

    • @Edgisco
      @Edgisco Год назад

      @@HamsaT12 crouch for owen.. as a replacement, yeah nice one pretty much like for like hahahaha