Faxxx😤 just like the sim hypothesis. When people have fucked there life they r going to believe in sim cause they believe that there lives do not matter and so they feel better
Yes because where else are people would to turn to. Rationality?. Maybe it is more rational to just kill ourselves now because it wouldn't even matter in a million years anyway
@Alex Perez Well not all of science is reliable, a lot of the time it completely changes and never stays the same. For something to be proven it has to stay consistent, tested, and observed to be proven as a fact.
also its clear that it would not want anyone to easily know about it since no religious groups can seem to agree with each other. There are tons of variations of Christianity, Lutheran, Seventh Day Adventist, Baptist, Methodist, etc that disagree on core tenants, even the mechanics of salvation
@Luke Macleran Jr. Tomlinson Why would you assume that's 'it' is a 'him', like a mere person. Why would it care to announce himself to a funny species of primate. If there is an entity or a group of entities that created the universe, maybe our ways of communicating and what we think are completely irrelevant to them.
@Luke Macleran Jr. Tomlinson So you worship this bloodthirsty maniac who is obsessed with our sex lives, deals in plagues and fireballs and created a place to torture souls for eternity?
@Luke Macleran Jr. Tomlinson You look like a stereotypical believer who flushed his brains down the toilet a long time ago, or else, much more likely, you were never born with any at all. You keep using the word 'evidence' repeatedly, and yet the only 'proof' you can offer is a book that claims to be right... because it says so?? If that's all it takes to convince you, and if that's what you call 'evidence', you never should have been allowed to leave elementary school, let alone high-school, unless of course you were home-schooled, which wouldn't surprise me.
This is a thought I had shortly after I lost faith in Christianity almost 3 years ago. After I watched a documentary about Hinduism, and found out for the first time that those folks in India believed in their theologies just as fervently as I and my fellow Christians believed in ours, I realized how foolish it was for anyone 2k yrs ago to say that if you werent born again/saved through Jesus you weren't going to heaven, instead burn in hell forever. How foolish it was to believe that there was a god who created souls, and injected souls into human babies that were born into cultures that, by no fault of their own, were raised to believe something other than Christian doctrine, and would one day die and find themselves standing in front of a strange god that they knew nothing about, and be told they were going to hell for rejecting the "truth" of Christianity. Christians who assert that this is what will happen, who also claim that this god is "Just" in everything he does, should really try a mental exercise and trying reversing the roles. They should imagine, if they believed and practice Christianity as was taught to them their whole lives, and expected to go to heaven after death, of how they would feel if they suddenly found themselves in the Islamic version of their own god, or even aanother wrathful god they had never heard of, and the god told them that they were going to burn forever for rejecting a truth that they were unfamiliar with.. Would these Christians believe that this strange god that they knew little or nothing about was merciful for placing them in bad circumstances during life where they couldn't learn and/or accept the "REAL TRUTH"? I highly doubt they would think of this strange god as merciful, good, moral, and Just in all it does if they were placed in the same shoes of the other folks in the world who they think are going to hell. Pure HYPOCRISY!!!!!
Thanks. Very helpful to someone like me who is from a different culture and religion. Many of our people convert to be a fundamental Christians and turn around to curse and burn all our religious practices and symbols as Devil, causing bitter divisions in nearly every family, relatives and friends. They inspired me to read and study the bible, which I found no god but old bronze-age philosophy of absolute power and control of their subjects and wiping out of their enemies. OT writers animated their deities to control ancient Israel but failed. NT writers began to do the same but also failed so they switched the aim to other nations and cultures and succeed till nowadays. So obvious and ridiculous but no one seems to see what I see.
@@pngfowl Anyone can't help but notice that every single activity that the Abrahamic god was ever up to, coincidentally was lways within the same region of the middle east that these early monotheists resided in, and seemed to never bother with the rest of human cultures around the world, except when he flooded it. Even before the jews became "god's chosen people" when the promise was made to Abraham that yahweh would bless his descendants, it still always seemed that this god was picking favorites from tribes in those areas and ignoring the rest of the world Thats exactly what to expect when folks, who had no clue about the rest of the world creates mythology and attributes it to their invisible sky daddy, they pretend that it favors them since they seem to be the only ones having the delusion of the god they believed in. You find this trend in most ancient religious mythologies, the invisible gods always favors them. Anyways, I give you my best wishes, and hope you have a wonderful life Make the most of it because this is all that we know that we have for sure, and be a blessing to others around you. :-)
It depends on one’s understanding of the “thumb system”😉 I’m a believer in Christ, but I think it’s a very fair topic, which raises very good questions.
Give me one example of a phenomenon that used to have a religious explanation, and now has a scientific one. A seemingly endless stream of examples come to mind. But to come up with just one example of a phenomenon that used to have a scientific explanation, and now has a religious one, is a riddle that even the most sophisticated theologian will undoubtedly fail to solve. Religion has given us nothing and asks for everything in return, while science has given us everything and asks us for nothing. Science has provided us with knowledge that allow us to live longer, healthier, more comfortable, and most important of all, more enjoyable lives. The only things wrong with fundamentalist religion, are the fundamentals of religion.
Steve mc But maybe the purpose of religious faith never involved explaining physical phenomena to begin with. Nor is it true that science asks for nothing: It is a multibillion dollar enterprise supported by tax money while religion in western countries is now completely voluntary.
"But maybe the purpose of religious faith never involved explaining physical phenomena to begin with." But of course it did. Every culture created mythologies around nature: the sun rising and setting being a god, storms/earthquakes/other disasters as the result of gods being angry... humans with epilepsy being mistaken for demon possession... everything that ancient humans encountered and feared, religious ideas were used as explanations. Religious faith was the only explanation for the world that humans found themselves in. Ancient humans had no idea how to explain their world or their mere existence and what makes it possible. "Nor is it true that science asks for nothing" "Science" (the principal of science) asks for nothing. It is strictly a set of logical precepts that can be used to deduce facts about the universe. The "enterprise" that seeks to use science needs to have money in order to conduct such research. No religious person would equate the "church" (and all of the corruption and evil within) as the religion itself. Likewise, "science" is not the multibillion dollar enterprise. But honestly, it's foolish to think that science can be done without the funding or incentive. Ask a microbiologist to do their work without the necessary tools, and then re-evaluate your statement.
Jamal Jewell did anyone say that?.. I know I didn't. That would not only be false, it would be absurd. I'm not sure who's comment you're responding to.
"Purposeful function in any sense must start from a planned idea for it to work." - Why do you think the universe has a purposeful function? One of the flaws of human thinking is assigning purpose or meaning when it isn't there.
I like Sam Harris but this clip dissapointed me as he didn't seem to consider a creator. He considered the competing god claims of Christianity and Islam and came to the right conclusion, in my opinion. But I wanted to see him consider a creator philosophically, mathematically, etc. and then see how he explains the problems with concluding that there is a god philosophically etc...
schitlipz most atheist intellectuals are agnostics, or at least - atheist agnostics. That is, they do not believe but cannot disprove the existence. It's a very honest approach, imho.
Nothing fruitful can emerge from that endeavour. There is no way to calculate the possibility of a creator mathematically. To prove something's existence we first need to know *what* that is. That's why Sam Harris goes by whence we got the idea of a creator, that's the only way to even entertain this calculation. You can't possibly ask for someone to evaluate the possibility of something you can't even explain what is.
Julian Nikolay Krogh-Fredriksen I meant I hoped he would have considered it more philosophically than theologically. ie. teleological, cosmological, ontological, moral etc. And by mathematically I meant fine tuning.
verfed The very idea of a creator comes from these specific religious concepts. To evaluate the possibility of something we need to know *what* that is. Religious scripture is the only sources that claim to know *what* that is. Hence, the only logical discourse Harris can possibly make on this question is to go by the supposed creators we do "know" of. Asking for the possibility of "a creator" is like asking for the possibility of "a sound." It's a nonsensical question untill you can define what a creator is. The Bible gives us specific details of this supposed creator that can help us determine the possibility of his existence. These details are crucial to even be able to begin an evaluation of possibility. We can't talk about the possibility of something we don't know what is.
verfed all the arguments you just presented, have already been falsified numerous times over - including by Harris, Hitchens, Dawkins, Dennett, Tyson and others. Why rehash arguments that have already been proven to be false?
i was born into a raising based upon christianity. i decided to stop practicing 6 years ago. i am 25 now. it still makes me question every decision i make. makes me feel unsure and ashamed, even if i am not hurting anyone within the decision at hand. i can’t really enjoy life. i get angry and vocally tell god that i hate him. i feel trapped. when i get depressed god’s presence is conjured more than ever. so i pray really hard on my hands and knees; asking for forgiveness, faith, my submission, and whatever else i was raised to ask for. for a second i am calm just to focus and see if i have been at all relieved. but then i realize nothing stirring in me and i feel even more hopeless than ever. i wouldn’t wish this upon anyone. i envy those who weren’t raised to believe in a hell. i wouldn’t wish it upon anyone. if you are in my position, i am sorry
That’s a very sad story. I’m so sorry you are struggling. I only recently admitted to myself I’m an atheist, even though I lost my faith 40 years ago. I missed church. The poetic, inspiring language, the singing, the rituals, and especially my long talks with god and the feeling that I was a good person. I attended the Unitarian Universalist organization, which gave me all of these, without the dogma or forced beliefs. They are an interfaith or non-denominational group. Belief in god is not required, but often discussed. It’s a great place to hear words of gratitude, and to meet people who like to be active in their community. My favorite saying from there is that each of us holds a piece of the truth. I like that, no one person has all the answers, but each of us has value and perspectives that are valid. If you’re still sad, and need a laugh, try video cartoons by DarkMatter2525. Laughter heals. It helped me to laugh along at familiar Bible stories. Church taught me not to ask questions. Now I quite delight in hearing other people ask those same questions, without the gaslighting or bullying. I also recommend The Bible Reloaded, they read directly from the Bible, while making silly commentary. Some days I think I’m completely over it, then I see the numbers 666 and I realize how I still retain superstitious fears from childhood religious training. Many atheists see their religious indoctrination to have been crippling. If you are still depressed a month later reach out. To me, to other RUclips video makers and commenters, or the UU church. There is a whole community to help support people in your position, without judging you. Hope you’re feeling better now.
This is a shining example of the toxicity of religion. The true horror it puts people through. Something that helped me early on was not only the realization that it's irrational to believe in a god, but that if one does exist, then they are of such a monstrous, immoral quality that they are undeserving of my time or worship.
You have time. Focus on improving your life situation you sound like you're in a tough spot. There's a reason 80% of the world is religious...as you age and your days grow fewer you need some hope that all the sum of your hopes, works, dreams turns into more than worm sh*t.
As a Christian man, I do not agree with that, but I do understand what you went through. I do not know your life and for that I will not assume anything. I used to be scared as well, but then i thought about the alternative. Heaven also exists for those that wish to repent and turn to a holy life. I have faith in God that He will judge my fate fairly and just as He will for you too. Its not something to be scared of because He is merciful.. God is merciful and He wishes to take all of our fears away through prayer, worship, but most importantly relationship. You may not notice it, but He could be doing wonders more than you realize. Either way we have a long life ahead to see it through. I hope you find your fulfillment through life and death with all of my heart.
No matter where we are born we must learn to think for ourselves. The average person goes through life guided by what has been foisted upon him. When we find ourselves at mid-life having the values of what has been handed us, it only means that we have been indoctrinated, not educated, we may even be enslaved as so many over-educated college graduates are today. They are not taught but programmed, and often it's the final blow to the Self because of the utmost respect these schools garner.
Thank you. This gets mixed up so often. He started talking about his view on the logic of the possibility of A creator, but then he focused entirely on religion. I find that frustrating in these types of discussions because religions can have it mostly wrong with the details, the dogma, etc, but yet still be right in the larger picture, that there is a designer. There is a difference between a discussion on religion and a discussion on the possibility of a creator/designer/architect, whatever the traits of said intelligence might be.
I hope years from now humans will look back on this age of ignorance and mark it as the dawn of reason. When men like Sam Harris were finally safe enough to spread logic and meaningful doubt. I'm sure in that future they'll be even bigger heroes then they are now.
+Bob Whackett According to Christianity, God was made into human form so that he could suffer like us and thus sympathize with our condition. To be fair this is quite different from simply sacrificing his only son.
+Keith Turner So an all knowing entity requires his son to be tortured so he can learn about things he does not know (i.e. what its like to be a human being)? Right...
WHAT'S MORE LIKLEY? Perfectly put! It's amazing to watch the mental gymnastics religious people have to do to try and make their religion seem perfectly logical lol it's actually impressive to watch at times lol
same. But I shouldn’t be surprised, it’s Sam Harris after all and he always resorts to thinking about the unlikelness of the existence of Gods from man-made religions. It’s not dumb to think that there is a creator, actually I think based on current info that it’s the most intelligent position to take l. Even if we’re living in a simulation, then we have a God because we have a creator. Even if aliens made us in a basement, we have a God, because we have a creator. Etc etc
@@crbobbyconstance He isn’t doing it wrong tho🤔. Cos answer this question honestly now, if there weren’t holy books nor religions, would the idea of God still be peddled as much?🤔
What an ignorant god they do worship...he made this flat, fixed in space earths first day on the second day. He created matter believing that light didn't 'already' exist at this point. He created a vial to hold the water up in the skies as not to flood the four legged insects and spiders, cud chewing rabbits. You would have thought the creator of the universe could have gotten at least one of these things right?
I agree that the creation of the universe doesn't really matter in a daily applicable sense but it is something to consider. Until science can come up with some logical explanation for existence, the concept of a creator cannot be disregarded entirely. And your right, science is a fascinating subject, without science we would still be living in caves and dying at 30, but the belief in a creator does not hinder scientific development. Any applicable science needs not cross path with religion.
The main reason that I stand firm in my faith is because of my relationship with Jesus Christ. I pray all the time about anything. I talk to God like I would a friend. He answers back through the Spirit placed in my heart. He doesn't literally speak, but it is something that you should try because the experience is hard to explain.
Yes... so have I... but you seem to be a good person....I think I am also.... but please answer my questions... please...all my life... over 70 now....I believe... but I have questions that you may answer...I am serious.... #1... WHO/what created the earth... only the earth. .#2... where is the Who/what...m?
If I were a religious person, I'd like to think I would be able to see the literal unquestionable logic in Sam Harris when he discusses such subjects and revaluate my beliefs. Sadly the religious people are so offended by his contrast of beliefs they ridicule these views other than consider them first.
As a devout Catholic, some of my favorite people to follow are Sam Harris, Bill Maher, and Richard Dawkings. They just seem to be very intelligent people and make some very good points. I grapple with my religion all the time as well, but have never lost my faith. I'm not a good christian apologist, so I won't try to defend my faith, there are religious people more knowledgeable who can do that. I guess I can just say that I don't believe the bible should be taken literally, to me, it never has. It's an oligarchical book of parables and stories designed to illustrate human nature and the ways that we may live our lives. We also need to understand the context that it's a 2000 year old library of books written by different people who were inspired by God. Perhaps I'm a more moderate Catholic, and more conservative Catholics will have other opinions. Either way, I think that basically if you do well in life and are a good person, you won't go to Hell or anything like that. So, in my book, people like Sam Harris and Bill Maher and Richard Dawkings are not going to Hell to suffer any punishment, I think they are just misguided, and I hope God understands it as such. They are good people.
+Juan Veliz one of the biggest things for me is Evolution. If all the evidence toward evolution is true and I find it quite believable, then religion then doesn't quite work for me.
Your belief in Evolution is just another Belief based largely on Blind Faith!! So why arbitrarily choose to denounce one faith-based ideology only to believe another?!? I always saw the flaws of evolution and it is now being strongly challenged by Biology!! Most of you won't know this because it's at the forefront of science but evolution is in really big trouble at the moment and is under threat of being utterly annihilated as a belief!! And it's super funny that the thing threatening it is another field of science Lol
Above all, I just want you to realize that your belief in evolution is really nothing more than a belief based almost entirely on Blind Faith!! Maybe ask yourself "why" you CHoSE to have faith in one over the other... And it is just a matter of faith and nothing more!! You are simply taking someone else's word for truth with evolution and that's No different than being religious!! And For some reason, most people don't seem to realize that Materialism was thoroughly Debunked long ago!!
+Clint Eastwood Evolution is apart of the process. You need to question farther. Where did each species come from and trace it back and back and back. Eventually, you'll find it comes back to the Big Bang. What caused the Big Bang? In my opinion, God did. Not God in the sense that most people view "him" for he isn't a person at all. Think of God as a great over flowing energy that never is full of himself. Not in a narcissistic sense either. A literal sense. God is the orgin, the source of everything created in the universe, and God never stops flowing out.
+miamix24 Question everything you have heard before. Find out for yourself. Question your own beliefs and even the one I just wrote out. Find out and experience it for yourself, you'll see the truth. It has a funny way of revealing itself. Best of luck
It is still widely believed because humans will cling to anything that flatters their self-esteem and vanity. They are given (some) added courage by believing the universe is controlled by a being who shares their tastes and prejudices.
How is it impossible? The interesting part is that Muhammad (blessings etc.) was illiterate, and missionaries taught him to read and write using the Bible for examples of when and where to apply certain grammatical rules etc. Muhammad's native tongue, of course, was Arabic, so it's only a matter of circumstance that in order to test himself, he would have translated the book he knew best. Whatever alterations there are, he probably made to take into account evolving social norms and problems.
It's truly obvious that the Qur'an is manmade. An honest Christian would never be convinced by the Qur'an, whereas any honest Muslim will be convinced by the Bible. It becomes truly obvious to those who study both books.
The Qur'an claims to be a continuation but it conflicts with the Bible to such an extent that, in the 11th century, the Muslim scholar Ibn Hazm argued that the Bible was corrupted (because he believed the Qur'an's claim that it can't be corrupted, although the Qur'an also claims that the Bible cannot be corrupted, but I digress). Nowadays, many Muslims are taught Ibn Hazm's idea simply because they have to believe this to believe that the Qur'an isn't false, but the Qur'an still claims that the Bible cannot be corrupted. This results in the conclusion that the Qur'an is false for opposing the Bible it claims to be perfectly preserved. Also, Ibn Hazm claimed that the Bible must have been corrupted after the 7th century because Muhammad and the Qur'an claim that the Bible was perfectly preserved during Muhammad's time, but we know what the Bible said way before that time. Biblical manuscripts are the most numerous manuscripts in existence. In fact, they are so numerous that they many times outnumber all of the world's next 10 manuscripts combined. For example, just the Greek manuscripts of the New Testament alone already outnumber the next 10 manuscripts combined by two to one, and all of the manuscripts of the New Testament are four to five times as numerous as that. We know that the Bible was the same before Muhammad's time, so Muhammad was a false prophet who did not know what the Bible taught, which is the real reason why the Qur'an opposes the Bible, because the Bible never changed.
Good for you, keep up the intolerance. All I can say for sure is that this world is so full of evil and of hate that I HAVE to believe in something or I wouldn't be able to get up in the morning. This all has to be for something, all the bullshit we put up with on a daily basis and all the horrible things that happen to people makes me seek refuge in the possibility of something more, something greater.
I LOOOOOOVE how he refered to the matrix instead of unicorns, fairies or the flying spaghetti monster. I've steadily grown to hate hearing those in argument.
Indeed, simulation hypothesis and a higher power causing the Big Bang sound less ridiculous than the Flying Spaghetti Monster, the Invisible Pink Unicorn, or Russell’s Teapot
God is impossible for this reason Who or what made God? If you say he always existed, In what reality or non reality did he exist , there must be no time before God , time and space must be created by God , if there is no time before God , there is no time for God to exist in. Conclusion there is no God. , notice I have given God a human nature which can not be as he would have existed before time and space .this leads ultimately to an infinite regression which is a logical fallacy.
Fernando Dosa I think the thing you have to consider when thinking about who or what made God is you would have to factor in the fact that He is a superior being(/race or whatever you would like to insert here); which means that He has a elevated level of knowledge and wisdom that we do not have. Think of it this way; if an advanced alien species were to visit Earth and tell us that they created a time machine and told us how they made one, it probably wouldn't make sense (or at least not at first). So, if God were to tell us how He is able to alter time and space, and how He is here, we probably wouldn't be able to comprehend it with our limited abilities. In other words, God is a higher, more intelligent and great being than we are in every way, shape, and form; thus meaning Him telling us how He is here, how He was able to create us, and how He is able to, for lack of better words, bend space and time, would probably overload our brain capacity and would render it unable to comprehend by us.
If we can not comprihend or even imagine such a consept. That is why I am an atheist and so should you that is to say I am not convinced such a thing exits. You have failed to provide any imperical evidence to warrant a guilty verdict. the only verdict is to find god not guilty.
Fernando Dosa First of all, you assume that I am religious and try to convince me of things which you do not know if I believe in or not. I was not trying to convince you of anything, nor was I stating any evidence to support religion of any kind. I was merely stating, while being unbiased of this topic, why these things are unknown if you go ahead and assume God is real. I was trying to provide an unbiased opinion on these things and am not trying to entice or provoke any sort of argument regarding religion. You have your beliefs and I have mine, and regardless of what I think is true, I will not judge you for your beliefs and I will not try to convince you of anything, so I would expect the same courtesy from you. Now if you wish to choose to continue to try and convince me of one thing, while you do not even know what my beliefs are, then by all means go ahead; however you will be the only one in the conversation. If you wish to continue with this discussion with me included, then I would ask you to be respectful and I will as well. So let's be professional about this and not act like children fighting over which car is better.
I have not used any durogatory language , as far as my beliefs , I believe a lot of things for witch I have good reason , you can believe things for bad reasons or good reasons , I try to believe as many true things and less false things as possible. My atheism is a question on does a god exist , for that question it is not a belief but rather a lack of a belief , example, I don't believe in Santa, fairies leprechauns big foot ,Zeus, Thor, put an A in front of those examples and you are expressing non beliefs.
I know you were not using any obscene language and I understand your grounds to constitute a lack of belief. I've gotten us off course of my original statement/topic and I apologize.
"Sam Harris refutes the notion of an intelligent creator." Um no, one of the first things he said was that it's an unfalsifiable claim. This is why we can't have nice things...
Lol... Yeah, I didn't see where he refuted Anything at ALL except the idea that he is actually open-minded and doesn't adhere to arbitrary faith-based beliefs!! You can't falsify the existence of God... Exactly!!!!
@Adam Rath: An unfalsifiable claim means you cannot prove a creator exists. Nor could there be a possibility of one, as then you would have a proof, which could be falsified.
+Scott Smith It means that the idea of a sentient god either existing or not existing can only be based on speculative belief, as any "evidence" of either view is actually arguable for both sides, nullifying it. Just a merry-go-round with words...
@Adam Rath: After re-reading your comment, I meant to say I agree with the first part of your statement - that the existence of god is speculative belief. However, the second part of your statement doesn't follow. If any evidence of either view is arguable for both sides, then you have a falsifiable claim. A contradiction is still evidence.
The bigger point here is that "right and wrong" don't come from the bible or "god" in the first place. It's based on how we view ourselves and what we want from our existence in relation to others in the first place.
Many people say that God answers their prayers with a yes, no or maybe, which is true, but like other people say, it doesn't prove anything.God does answer prayers in the way that benefits Him and them the most.The time that God always fulfills my prayers is when I ask Him for things that will benefit Him, not me.I ask for wisdom about Him,I get it.I ask for opportunities to spread His word,more were given than before,I asked Him to help me play guitar better for church and I became much better
Have you never heard the tale that she was raped by a Roman soldier named "Panthera" (who really existed for certain) and invented the immaculate conception story to cover it up?!? Not saying I believe it, just wanted you to know that the idea you mentioned has been around pretty much since the beginning of Christianity!! Check into it...
PART 6: There is so much more joy found in being obedient to God than not obedient. Sinning brings immediate and short-lasting pleasure, but serving God brings everlasting joy. People's lives will be so much more fruitful if they serve God instead of serving themselves. That is why many Christians are good people, why they go to church, why they pray and read the Bible. Because they love God and want to serve Him, but not because they have to.
Sam Harris is like the 8th grader who asked my music class, "Can God create a rock so big he can't lift it?" The height of arrogance, to live surrounded by an infinity of perfections and yet, to belittle the reality of it by an all-knowing exceptionalism. For if God choose to never give the boy an answer, would he ever know the answer?
GOD --- COMMON HORSE SENSE Without God, life would have no logic, meaning, hope or purpose. Try and rationalize an existence without God, an exercise in futility. Without God, life would be immoral, wrong, unjust, unfair, unequal, full of sin and evil. With God, someday life will be moral, right, just, fair, equal, free of sin and good. Without God, planet earth would have no purpose, for to overcome evil is it's only purpose.
LocoZiLLo Nothing in science is proven. It's why there's so much debate in science. All theories and facts are held as tentative. Nothing is beyond question. The evidence for a creator is strong. But instantly turning to religion for the answer is not scientific. It's childish and even possibly dishonest. Does Sam have an atheistic bias or agenda? Religion has little to nothing to do with a scientific approach to researching the possibility of an intelligent creator behind the universe.
the chikmiester Think about your nightly dreams. Is not your mind the Creator of the Universe you believe you are in when you are dreaming? Are not all the laws of physics in your dream simply caused by your own mind? Are not the walls solid simply due to your own mind? Is it not clear to you that the mind is quite capable of being a Creator? Can you see that it does this naturally, effortlessly and without your slightest awareness? Maybe it even enjoys imagining universes? Maybe you like to imagine universes and believing you are trapped inside them? The next question should be, What makes you believe you aren't doing it right now? Or maybe, What makes you think you're not maybe in a collective dream, the Creator then being a collective of minds? What makes you so sure you're not dreaming right now?
1971SuperLead A lot maybe's , nothing that functional in reality and i choose to live in reality.. I can ask thousands of these kinds of questions but my time is valuable.. Okay just one , what if you are a dumb person in delusion thinking you are smart...
we have tiny critters by the trillions inside of us, but do we know them? are we their god? no.. but if they are smart enough to know about us, they may worship us. and actually think we can hear them. Thats what i think everything is, i think our entire universe is just inside something living, and it is inside something living, an endless up and down cycle. and maybe even intertwined. who knows the very large may just be a representation of the very small. and size is just relative to your surroundings.
There is hope for anyone, no matter how kind or evil they are, if they ask God to forgive them. There is nothing to lose, God's grace is a gift. So if when you die you have not asked God for His forgiveness, then your chance is up. But there is always hope no matter at what point in your life you are at.
You see this is a great example of why I put my faith in my God. He doesn't ask anything of humans. He will bring us to heaven regardless of what we have done. All we have to do is accept His gift. I should be able to keep this account, and God would still love me. You can never do anything that will cause God to stop loving you. If you ask God to forgive you for your sins, He will and you will go to heaven. That is an awesome God.
You're absolutely right. A creator cannot currently be disproved, but since there's also no evidence to prove it either, it's kind of a moot point. You also touched on a key point for Atheists, which is that science doesn't need to cross paths with religion. We can explain the world without Deities so we remove them from the EQ. The extremists of both groups make it seem like we hate each other, but most Atheists are tolerant of your beliefs, even if we don't personally agree with them.
You're totally right, Sam. There are several books in conflict. Now, a scientific approach would TEST the validity of each of the books. Why don't more people take the time to actually read the books so they actually know what they are rejecting? Instead, most cherry-pick verses to fit within their ideology. Real, true comparative analysis takes time and effort, and no one wants to do that. The main reason is most people are not actually looking for answers, but for excuses.
QUOTE: "So basic chemistry can write all the info in a DNA?" Yes, also it can create oceans, mountains, planets, stars, galaxies and every structure in the known universe of any degree of complexity. It doesn't need intelligence to do this. Intelligence is but an outgrowth of this process.
I'm proud of you brother, debating through different ideas and sorting through them in terms of plausibility. I will however, say that many implausible theses were shown to be true when more evidences and supporting ideas emerged, so an idea should not be rejected simply on the basis of low probability or high incomprehensibility. I would say that the very fact that we have a tendency to move towards the truth and away from the false indicates that the truth does indeed exist and if there ever were a person of truth we would move towards him and not apart from him, that is, if we have ever had any disposition towards truth at all. And the truth will liberate us from coin toss situation because the truth is never probabilistically determined but always certainly derived.
It is people who have gone through hardship who love God the most. God is the rock that they stand firm upon, they do not fail and God gives them the strength to carry on. Life is not perfect and God isn't going to step in and make it that way, we have to take up our crosses and follow God until that day when there will be no more pain, no more suffering and God will wipe away every tear from every face.
We have a model of the world, such as "I'm typing now," "Sam Harris lives in California," and "I am sitting at home in Yamaguchi." All these are hypotheses which more or less correctly describe the world but the are only a model. Furthermore we are ourselves part of the model. But what of the reality? There is something outside of the model doing the modelling, where the model takes place. It is not "the brain." Brains too are part of the model. So, some people give that place a special name...
QUOTE: "If a man can embody two roles, why not the Creator?" Don't be absurd, no one can literally be his own father or his own son. I fully understand the symbology behind the Father/Son/Holy Ghost mythology-- and the facile mind games that lie behind it.
He compared the principle behind these books, not the historical context surrounding them. It doesn't matter which book was written first and for how long, it doesn't change his point one bit.
Remarkable. What Sam Harris just said is that by accident of conception, he has been wholly determined from all eternity to be the locus of the thoughts expressed above, as well as all others he has ever entertained and believed, owing to utterly contextless, meaningless laws of necessity, themselves presented to his subjective experience, all ideas being equal. I don't find that incredibly complex explanation, hopeless abyssmal ignorance by definition, to be much improved over the alternatives.
Having ‘faith’ in only one way to ‘heaven’ is the easy route. People are are so brainwashed they are terrified to question anything in fear of ‘hell’. Questioning everything and searching for answers is the only way. Life is an individual experience not to be dictated by someone else. How much knowledge you gain is up to you alone. If you want to stop at one book and one belief...that’s on you.
In response to "mere accident of birth you are raised to believe that a certain book is the perfect birth". Just because someone is born into a house that believes in something does not justify the belief for the child. If someone was born in a house of alcoholics, that does not validate a license for the child to be an alcoholic. If no one in the family went to college, you don't expect the child to not try to achieve the truth and greater things.
Seeing the title of the video, I had the same idea many already commented about (that Sam Harris will actually consider a God) and felt some disappointment. But the more I think about it, the more I find "considering" a God/creator a difficult (impossible?) task to manage rationally, cause by doing so you actually conceptualize your own religion. Your guesses what the creator's plan is, how there may be lines between life and death, a soul, that we don't understand, wether the creator is to be worshipped or ignored... all of them are exactly that: guesses.
QUOTE: "Why is it morally good that the human race survive?" Humans desire to survive becasue we have inherited that trait. If our ancestors hadn't developed and passed that trait on, they would have become extinct and we wouldn't be here to wonder about the nature of our desire for survival.
I live in Taiwan where we have powerful typhoons. When the same storms hit the Philippines nearby, dozens are killed. Filipinos are strong Christians while Taiwanese are more commonly Buddhist. The Philippines are riddled with corruption and poverty while Taiwan is comfortable, prosperous and safe. Is yahweh answering the prayers or buddha? I have often wondered.
Christianity does not teach one to turn against his fellow man, its completely the opposite, and faith in a god does not imply blind ignorance to other aspects of the world. I do agree though that the concept of hell is not a good thing to install in a child. The principles of religion should be introduced in a professional manor so that the individual can make an informed decision.
It's not so much the irrationality of these ancient books, but rather the lack of consistency. What Sam said was that most of them seem to be in conflict with each other, specifically the abrahamic religion's holy books. They claim to have the same monotheistic god but they're ''Divine'' books are contradicting each other ad-nauseum which leads to the conclusion that either this ''God'' doesn't know what he's doing or he just doesn't exist. Which one is more likely?
the point was that believing in a creator is an unfalsifiable claim, and there can ultimately be no logical justification for believing an unfalsifiable claim.
I am friends with a Christian named Dr. Richard Litke who was raised atheist and hated the thought of a cruel and distant God. How did this man become a Christian? Did he become stupid? Did he throw out his knowledge of science and logic and then study in prestigious universities teaching Greek and Arabic for years and earn a doctorate out of pure luck? I do think that it is very hard to believe in God, but explain the extremely intelligent man choosing Christianity over believing in atheism.
God does so many things for so many different reasons. Perhaps He wanted to take the people of the Philippines home to Him in heaven, while He is giving the people of Taiwan another chance to accept Him and so that they might praise Him for keeping them safe.
Do you often resort to narrow-mindedness when you come across something you do not fully understand? Do you resort to poking fun at someone's belief's when you have not researched or stepped in their shoes? What makes you the better person? And how does this comment make you feel better about yourself? I suggest opening your mind to your world before attacking the people in it with snide jokes.
That's usually the way these types of conversations go, in circles. It truly is a timeless debate that people have always and will always conduct. But just out of curiosity, how do you explain the existence of the universe? Not being a smart ass here, just curious.
You know what I meant Shinedown. You can't tell me that you know what was going on in "that dimension from which the Big Bang emerged." I can't tell you what was going on either. Therefore, not one of us can say that the universe DEFINITELY emerged from nothing or DEFINITELY emerged from something. All we can do is speculate. But I THINK that it emerged from something and not nothing based on reasoning, logic and science NOT religion. This is my opinion and it is not wrong.
its weird how for any argument and topic of controversy in life people are ready to indulge and come up with reasons for why they think a specific aspect is the right one however, when it comes to religion , the cognitive argument is why to even discuss the merits of any of the religions, as if it is assured that the right way to go about it is to just have this downward view of all believers and religions rather than examining them
julia Robert Not exactly. It really depends on the theologian. I am not an expert on Islam so I can't speak for them. But Johannes Calvin actually said only an elect would be saved but no one could read the mind of God. Calvins theology left the possibility open for even non believers of Christ to be saved by Jesus. Origen actually had the idea of universal salvation over lifetimes similar to Hindu Karma. The debate between Luther and Erasmus is very fascinating in its implications in regards to free will or not. Even though I come out of the Calvinist tradition, and Paul Tillich has an expanded notion of this saying be open and universal salvation. Etc. Most Christians actually have no concept of theological ideas they just follow whatever and don't think. In my opinion the real problem with Contemporary Christianity is most have foreclosed on actually thinking and contemplating various ideas and values. There are 2000 years of many versions of Christianity and people stick to social conformity? That's the real problem. That's lazy idolatry not trying to understand a great mystery.
the actual quote. ""A human being is part of the whole called by us universe , a part limited in time and space. We experience ourselves, our thoughts and feelings as something separate from the rest. A kind of optical delusion of consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from the prison by widening our circle of compassion..." - Albert Einstein
perhaps it's just more respectful sounding than the causation being weakness and fear driving people to latch on to comfortable lies of immortality? the point he exposes is that it is impossible to know which religion is the "right" one. there is no religion with 0 converts moving AWAY from it. or, no religion that people stop and stay at.
the cause. Another issue is the battle with contraceptives. That is Catholic in nature and does not extend to many denominations of Christianity, but realize that when you ask an individual to accept religion as a good thing, you are telling me to believe that it is okay for someone to spread the idea that contraceptive use is a mortal sin and as such should be punished. That is a ploy by the church to increase church membership. Islam does the same thing with promoting large family sizes.
There found it. If I recall correctly, the Lord rested on the Sabbath, doing no work. So the Sabbath would then be a resting day to praise God. So one working on the Sabbath would be giving God a massive finger on his decision to rest. However up until very recently (Historically speaking) resting on the Sabbath was possible. In modern society you can't and it's a silly rule anyway but it guaranteed one days rest a week for anyone working. So one can view that rule as one of the first unions.
QUOTE: "without a creators perspective, the atheists "knows" there is no right and wrong.. " Atheists uphold traditional morals and soial norms when they are just and compassionate because what is good for society is good for the individual. Any morality found in religion was put there by humans, just as the knowledge in books was put there by humans.
I was looking forward to him speaking on this topic without a religious foundation. He totally redirected the question which was not presented as a religious belief. Gatekeeping at it's finest.
You actually have made very valid points and I admit to attacking you verbally out of emotion-driven incentives, and I apologize for such blatant and facetious comments towards you. It was unkind and ignorant. I only find it frustrating when someone "pokes fun" at something that I hold true to, and it is difficult when "hypocritical Christians" and gay protesters happen to be the ones that get my religion into trouble. I am supposed to love you, not judge you, and I apologize for my outburst.
I don't have an explanation for the existence of the universe, as science itself hasn't figured it out yet. Science isn't a perfect knowledge of everything, it's always growing, always improving itself. I'm okay with that personality, since let's be honest here, how the universe started really doesn't matter in our lives. What matters is how we live our lives and interact with one another.
As always, I love Sam Harris’ assessment and breakdown of these topics, but the question was about the possibility of the existence of a creator. While the claim that a creator exists is unfalsifiable, as he states, the answer to the question is still “yes.” There is a possibility that a god exists. Is it probable? That’s another question, which is what he seems to be addressing in this video.
As stated by Neil deGrasse Tyson, if there is a God (which in my opinion is 50/50 either it exists or it doesn’t) it’s either all powerful but not all good, or all good but not all powerful
Very interesting point. Since we are as you correctly say, we are "self-assembly" Since, unlinke machines, we can assemble ourselves, does that suggest to you, the OP or anyone, that we can model ourselves. It seems to me that science is great. But that some giants have been caught up in it. Worms, rabbits and chimps are very complex, but their world view is probably not. If they were to think they were any part of their world model, they'd be very wrong. How about us?
I would argue that other religions do not have a relationship with God because they pray because it is a requirement, they have a set number of times per day and many pray pre-written prayers. They have no relationship, and there is no way for them to know that they need Jesus Christ in order to. My relationship with God is this: I talk to God an uncountable number of times throughout the day pouring out whatever is on my heart to Him. I thank Him and I ask Him to help me with things
Converts discredit his argument that location determines you're religion. Yes if you're raised in a Christian family you're likely to take up that tradition, just like you're likely to take up certain their habits, preferred food, way of saying things, etc. But is that an argument concerning the validity of a religion. No. Location vs religion implies a correlation, not a causation.
When Sam says, "they were toiling in ignorance about the birth of the cosmos," it seems much descriptive of a naturalistic atheist than of a person of faith.
@@Lonewolf--- I would not deny faith or ignorance in either of our belief systems... regardless of your belief. I just don't possess enough faith to be an atheist.
@@kylealford23 --- You seem to have a profound misunderstanding of what an atheist is. Atheism has no "belief system," and does not involve "faith" in any way whatsoever. It is, in fact, the very lack of both of those concepts. The key difference between the two parties, however, is that atheism is in line with science, which takes great pride in it's own ignorance, and continuously strives to overcome it with discovery of facts. Religion, on the other hand, is quite convinced that it already has all the answers, in spite of the fact that science continues to prove it wrong.
@@Lonewolf--- Hey man or woman, I appreciate your response. I think, however, you are confused on one point. Though atheism has no belief system, atheists do! All atheists make great assumptions; and life necessitates that we fill in the gaps that lie between the evidence and the observable. By faith (in textbooks, in the secular scientific community, in their logic and reason) they form a narrative about what actually corresponds to reality. A majority of atheists (including myself in a previous life) hold the belief that there is nothing supernatural, that the world started from nothing and had no cause, that life came from non-life, that biological evolution explains the diversity in the animal and plant kingdom. If you, personally hold any or all of these beliefs in your “belief system” then you have made some great intellectual commitments of “faith”. And you have likely put your faith in people that have great incentive (be it professional, financial or social) to disavow religious belief. In regards to the scientific community… I love science. I have an advanced degree in science. And I will tell you unequivocally that the secular scientific world is anything but humble. They are politicized and will often fight tooth and nail for their doctrine. For example, if a new scientific discovery reveals a misconception about a long held evolutionary belief, removing it from a scientific textbook is nearly impossible (i.e. human gill slits in embryo). Your bold statements that science continues to prove religion wrong may have some truth in many specific instances. That is why it would be a fool’s errand to defend all “religion”. Certainly, not all “belief systems” have equal merit.
@@kylealford23 --- Your assertion that atheism has no belief system, but atheists do, is illogical. Theism is the belief in the existence of a God or Gods. The prefix, "a," means "non." Therefore, an atheist is simply someone who does not belief in the existence of a God or Gods--nothing more, nothing less. Any interpretation beyond that simple definition is just a misrepresentation of the term. It does not involve a doctrine or belief of any kind, with regard to theism--it is the express lack of the same! That lack of belief stems from not being convinced that the theistic teachings are true--usually due to errors, contradictions, and a lack of supportive evidence in those teachings. Your assertion that atheism requires faith in textbooks, the secular scientific community, or their own logic and reason. is also flawed. You are confusing faith with trust. Faith is belief without evidence--period! Trust, on the other hand is a level of confidence in something or someone, based on evidence. We've all heard the expression, "trust has to be earned." That is the key difference between the two concepts--trust has to be earned, faith does not! With that in mind, atheists do indeed trust in certain people or things from time to time, but that trust is based on some form of evidence that those people or things are reliable--not blind faith. The assertions made in textbooks can be researched and verified. The findings of the scientific community are constantly subjected to peer revue, and are modified as needed, if new evidence dictates. The concepts of logic and reason are the very foundation of truth and reality, and as such, cannot be dismissed. Finally, your references to the origin of the earth, life, and biological evolution, are subjects of which no-one yet has all the answers, and may never have. That does not, however, make it logical and rational to resort to the "argument from ignorance" approach, by blindly accepting the explanations of ancient religious texts--particularly when those texts are filled with extraordinary claims, containing errors, contradictions, and a lack of supportive evidence. One must remember that belief in Gods was simply mankind's first attempt to explain all of the things that he could not possibly understand. As our species has progressed, we have learned to use scientific methodology to examine those mysteries and reach conclusions based on logic and reason, which comply with and verify what we observe to be reality. For those questions for which we still do not have answers, our correct response is, simply, we don't know--yet! Yes, there are those who would attempt to pervert science by subversive means, for their own personal gain, but that is why peer revue is used as a method of oversight, to minimize such behavior as much as possible. And most importantly--as previously mentioned--whenever mistakes or intentional misrepresentations are discovered in science, they are addressed and dealt with accordingly. The independent revue of such issues by scientists around the globe insures--even though it may take some time--that those errors are brought to light. Religious texts, on the other hand are closed systems, which--aside from some minor variations in interpretation--are considered to be indisputable truth, which in most cases cannot be altered. That is where blind faith becomes a very necessary, but unreliable commodity. Some of us simply find that reasoning unacceptable!
Want to get Smarter, Faster?
Subscribe for DAILY videos: bigth.ink/GetSmarter
Scripture has measage of there beign a creator @ creation .genesis 1:1-31 romans. All Scripture.
When life gets tough, people turn to fantasy.
Faxxx😤 just like the sim hypothesis. When people have fucked there life they r going to believe in sim cause they believe that there lives do not matter and so they feel better
Yes because where else are people would to turn to. Rationality?. Maybe it is more rational to just kill ourselves now because it wouldn't even matter in a million years anyway
Fantasy is when people turn to man made science with no evidence to explain it.
@Alex Perez Well not all of science is reliable, a lot of the time it completely changes and never stays the same. For something to be proven it has to stay consistent, tested, and observed to be proven as a fact.
@Alex Perez yeah and I rely on the Bible for truth because it has scientific evidence in it as well
If there is a creator, I doubt that man made religions have much to do with what "it" actually is.
also its clear that it would not want anyone to easily know about it since no religious groups can seem to agree with each other. There are tons of variations of Christianity, Lutheran, Seventh Day Adventist, Baptist, Methodist, etc that disagree on core tenants, even the mechanics of salvation
Luke Macleran Jr. Tomlinson I agree with you. But all evidence states that th e universe did not come by chance or random events.
@Luke Macleran Jr. Tomlinson Why would you assume that's 'it' is a 'him', like a mere person. Why would it care to announce himself to a funny species of primate. If there is an entity or a group of entities that created the universe, maybe our ways of communicating and what we think are completely irrelevant to them.
@Luke Macleran Jr. Tomlinson So you worship this bloodthirsty maniac who is obsessed with our sex lives, deals in plagues and fireballs and created a place to torture souls for eternity?
@Luke Macleran Jr. Tomlinson You look like a stereotypical believer who flushed his brains down the toilet a long time ago, or else, much more likely, you were never born with any at all.
You keep using the word 'evidence' repeatedly, and yet the only 'proof' you can offer is a book that claims to be right... because it says so??
If that's all it takes to convince you, and if that's what you call 'evidence', you never should have been allowed to leave elementary school, let alone high-school, unless of course you were home-schooled, which wouldn't surprise me.
This is a thought I had shortly after I lost faith in Christianity almost 3 years ago. After I watched a documentary about Hinduism, and found out for the first time that those folks in India believed in their theologies just as fervently as I and my fellow Christians believed in ours, I realized how foolish it was for anyone 2k yrs ago to say that if you werent born again/saved through Jesus you weren't going to heaven, instead burn in hell forever. How foolish it was to believe that there was a god who created souls, and injected souls into human babies that were born into cultures that, by no fault of their own, were raised to believe something other than Christian doctrine, and would one day die and find themselves standing in front of a strange god that they knew nothing about, and be told they were going to hell for rejecting the "truth" of Christianity.
Christians who assert that this is what will happen, who also claim that this god is "Just" in everything he does, should really try a mental exercise and trying reversing the roles. They should imagine, if they believed and practice Christianity as was taught to them their whole lives, and expected to go to heaven after death, of how they would feel if they suddenly found themselves in the Islamic version of their own god, or even aanother wrathful god they had never heard of, and the god told them that they were going to burn forever for rejecting a truth that they were unfamiliar with.. Would these Christians believe that this strange god that they knew little or nothing about was merciful for placing them in bad circumstances during life where they couldn't learn and/or accept the "REAL TRUTH"? I highly doubt they would think of this strange god as merciful, good, moral, and Just in all it does if they were placed in the same shoes of the other folks in the world who they think are going to hell. Pure HYPOCRISY!!!!!
Thanks. Very helpful to someone like me who is from a different culture and religion. Many of our people convert to be a fundamental Christians and turn around to curse and burn all our religious practices and symbols as Devil, causing bitter divisions in nearly every family, relatives and friends. They inspired me to read and study the bible, which I found no god but old bronze-age philosophy of absolute power and control of their subjects and wiping out of their enemies. OT writers animated their deities to control ancient Israel but failed. NT writers began to do the same but also failed so they switched the aim to other nations and cultures and succeed till nowadays. So obvious and ridiculous but no one seems to see what I see.
@@pngfowl Anyone can't help but notice that every single activity that the Abrahamic god was ever up to, coincidentally was lways within the same region of the middle east that these early monotheists resided in, and seemed to never bother with the rest of human cultures around the world, except when he flooded it. Even before the jews became "god's chosen people" when the promise was made to Abraham that yahweh would bless his descendants, it still always seemed that this god was picking favorites from tribes in those areas and ignoring the rest of the world Thats exactly what to expect when folks, who had no clue about the rest of the world creates mythology and attributes it to their invisible sky daddy, they pretend that it favors them since they seem to be the only ones having the delusion of the god they believed in. You find this trend in most ancient religious mythologies, the invisible gods always favors them.
Anyways, I give you my best wishes, and hope you have a wonderful life Make the most of it because this is all that we know that we have for sure, and be a blessing to others around you. :-)
@@brucecook502 Thanks again
@Greg right lol
@Greg America stole them
it's safe to say the dislikers are believers
I sincerely dislike the twilight saga, but I dont accept a word of it as fact.
Ya think?
I didn't click anything but I dislike the video (because it's pointless) and I'm not a "believer." Next question...
No.
It depends on one’s understanding of the “thumb system”😉 I’m a believer in Christ, but I think it’s a very fair topic, which raises very good questions.
Give me one example of a phenomenon that used to have a religious explanation, and now has a scientific one. A seemingly endless stream of examples come to mind. But to come up with just one example of a phenomenon that used to have a scientific explanation, and now has a religious one, is a riddle that even the most sophisticated theologian will undoubtedly fail to solve. Religion has given us nothing and asks for everything in return, while science has given us everything and asks us for nothing. Science has provided us with knowledge that allow us to live longer, healthier, more comfortable, and most important of all, more enjoyable lives. The only things wrong with fundamentalist religion, are the fundamentals of religion.
(silent clap)
Steve mc But maybe the purpose of religious faith never involved explaining physical phenomena to begin with. Nor is it true that science asks for nothing: It is a multibillion dollar enterprise supported by tax money while religion in western countries is now completely voluntary.
"But maybe the purpose of religious faith never involved explaining physical phenomena to begin with."
But of course it did. Every culture created mythologies around nature: the sun rising and setting being a god, storms/earthquakes/other disasters as the result of gods being angry... humans with epilepsy being mistaken for demon possession... everything that ancient humans encountered and feared, religious ideas were used as explanations. Religious faith was the only explanation for the world that humans found themselves in. Ancient humans had no idea how to explain their world or their mere existence and what makes it possible.
"Nor is it true that science asks for nothing"
"Science" (the principal of science) asks for nothing. It is strictly a set of logical precepts that can be used to deduce facts about the universe. The "enterprise" that seeks to use science needs to have money in order to conduct such research.
No religious person would equate the "church" (and all of the corruption and evil within) as the religion itself. Likewise, "science" is not the multibillion dollar enterprise. But honestly, it's foolish to think that science can be done without the funding or incentive. Ask a microbiologist to do their work without the necessary tools, and then re-evaluate your statement.
Jamal Jewell did anyone say that?.. I know I didn't. That would not only be false, it would be absurd. I'm not sure who's comment you're responding to.
much not all
Sam Harris articulates his thoughts so well.
"Purposeful function in any sense must start from a planned idea for it to work." - Why do you think the universe has a purposeful function?
One of the flaws of human thinking is assigning purpose or meaning when it isn't there.
If only there are more people who can articulate their thoughts as clearly as Sam and teach their wisdom, then world have been in better place.
He speaks like a politician.
I like Sam Harris but this clip dissapointed me as he didn't seem to consider a creator. He considered the competing god claims of Christianity and Islam and came to the right conclusion, in my opinion. But I wanted to see him consider a creator philosophically, mathematically, etc. and then see how he explains the problems with concluding that there is a god philosophically etc...
schitlipz most atheist intellectuals are agnostics, or at least - atheist agnostics. That is, they do not believe but cannot disprove the existence. It's a very honest approach, imho.
Nothing fruitful can emerge from that endeavour. There is no way to calculate the possibility of a creator mathematically.
To prove something's existence we first need to know *what* that is. That's why Sam Harris goes by whence we got the idea of a creator, that's the only way to even entertain this calculation.
You can't possibly ask for someone to evaluate the possibility of something you can't even explain what is.
Julian Nikolay Krogh-Fredriksen I meant I hoped he would have considered it more philosophically than theologically. ie. teleological, cosmological, ontological, moral etc. And by mathematically I meant fine tuning.
verfed The very idea of a creator comes from these specific religious concepts. To evaluate the possibility of something we need to know *what* that is. Religious scripture is the only sources that claim to know *what* that is. Hence, the only logical discourse Harris can possibly make on this question is to go by the supposed creators we do "know" of.
Asking for the possibility of "a creator" is like asking for the possibility of "a sound." It's a nonsensical question untill you can define what a creator is.
The Bible gives us specific details of this supposed creator that can help us determine the possibility of his existence. These details are crucial to even be able to begin an evaluation of possibility.
We can't talk about the possibility of something we don't know what is.
verfed all the arguments you just presented, have already been falsified numerous times over - including by Harris, Hitchens, Dawkins, Dennett, Tyson and others. Why rehash arguments that have already been proven to be false?
i was born into a raising based upon christianity. i decided to stop practicing 6 years ago. i am 25 now. it still makes me question every decision i make. makes me feel unsure and ashamed, even if i am not hurting anyone within the decision at hand. i can’t really enjoy life. i get angry and vocally tell god that i hate him. i feel trapped. when i get depressed god’s presence is conjured more than ever. so i pray really hard on my hands and knees; asking for forgiveness, faith, my submission, and whatever else i was raised to ask for. for a second i am calm just to focus and see if i have been at all relieved. but then i realize nothing stirring in me and i feel even more hopeless than ever. i wouldn’t wish this upon anyone. i envy those who weren’t raised to believe in a hell. i wouldn’t wish it upon anyone. if you are in my position, i am sorry
That’s a very sad story. I’m so sorry you are struggling. I only recently admitted to myself I’m an atheist, even though I lost my faith 40 years ago.
I missed church. The poetic, inspiring language, the singing, the rituals, and especially my long talks with god and the feeling that I was a good person.
I attended the Unitarian Universalist organization, which gave me all of these, without the dogma or forced beliefs. They are an interfaith or non-denominational group. Belief in god is not required, but often discussed. It’s a great place to hear words of gratitude, and to meet people who like to be active in their community. My favorite saying from there is that each of us holds a piece of the truth. I like that, no one person has all the answers, but each of us has value and perspectives that are valid.
If you’re still sad, and need a laugh, try video cartoons by DarkMatter2525. Laughter heals. It helped me to laugh along at familiar Bible stories. Church taught me not to ask questions. Now I quite delight in hearing other people ask those same questions, without the gaslighting or bullying. I also recommend The Bible Reloaded, they read directly from the Bible, while making silly commentary.
Some days I think I’m completely over it, then I see the numbers 666 and I realize how I still retain superstitious fears from childhood religious training.
Many atheists see their religious indoctrination to have been crippling. If you are still depressed a month later reach out. To me, to other RUclips video makers and commenters, or the UU church. There is a whole community to help support people in your position, without judging you.
Hope you’re feeling better now.
This is a shining example of the toxicity of religion. The true horror it puts people through. Something that helped me early on was not only the realization that it's irrational to believe in a god, but that if one does exist, then they are of such a monstrous, immoral quality that they are undeserving of my time or worship.
hope you made it to the light of reason
You have time. Focus on improving your life situation you sound like you're in a tough spot. There's a reason 80% of the world is religious...as you age and your days grow fewer you need some hope that all the sum of your hopes, works, dreams turns into more than worm sh*t.
As a Christian man, I do not agree with that, but I do understand what you went through. I do not know your life and for that I will not assume anything. I used to be scared as well, but then i thought about the alternative. Heaven also exists for those that wish to repent and turn to a holy life. I have faith in God that He will judge my fate fairly and just as He will for you too. Its not something to be scared of because He is merciful.. God is merciful and He wishes to take all of our fears away through prayer, worship, but most importantly relationship. You may not notice it, but He could be doing wonders more than you realize. Either way we have a long life ahead to see it through. I hope you find your fulfillment through life and death with all of my heart.
No matter where we are born we must learn to think for ourselves. The average person goes through life guided by what has been foisted upon him. When we find ourselves at mid-life having the values of what has been handed us, it only means that we have been indoctrinated, not educated, we may even be enslaved as so many over-educated college graduates are today. They are not taught but programmed, and often it's the final blow to the Self because of the utmost respect these schools garner.
You hit the nail right on the head! 100% agreed
Debating the logic of organized religion has nothing to do with the existence or non-existence of a God.
Thank you. This gets mixed up so often. He started talking about his view on the logic of the possibility of A creator, but then he focused entirely on religion. I find that frustrating in these types of discussions because religions can have it mostly wrong with the details, the dogma, etc, but yet still be right in the larger picture, that there is a designer. There is a difference between a discussion on religion and a discussion on the possibility of a creator/designer/architect, whatever the traits of said intelligence might be.
@Hal Landy Have you ever read "Conversations with God"? It's a great read without any dogma.
He completely failed at making an argument about the existence of a creator as the title suggests is the topic.
@@kault324 yep
@@kault324false, as he mentions in other talks, we use logic in any other decisions we make in our lives….. except for religion.
I hope years from now humans will look back on this age of ignorance and mark it as the dawn of reason. When men like Sam Harris were finally safe enough to spread logic and meaningful doubt. I'm sure in that future they'll be even bigger heroes then they are now.
The accident of birth concept is one of the best explanations to religion i have ever heard.
God is not all that bad. It's not like he sent his only son to be tortured and crucified on the cross - o..wait a minute...
+Bob Whackett According to Christianity, God was made into human form so that he could suffer like us and thus sympathize with our condition. To be fair this is quite different from simply sacrificing his only son.
+Keith Turner
So an all knowing entity requires his son to be tortured so he can learn about things he does not know (i.e. what its like to be a human being)? Right...
Ya isnt it unbelievable
Keith Turner It certainly is.
+CuiusRegio Yeah. The father, son and holy ghost are all considered to be aspects of the godhead.
The Mormon commercial converted me before I could get to the Sam Harris video. So close!
Good but if you become Muslim you wil be in paradise
religion is a particularly hefty example of cognitive dissonance, something we all are culprites of through life whether we like it or not
WHAT'S MORE LIKLEY? Perfectly put! It's amazing to watch the mental gymnastics religious people have to do to try and make their religion seem perfectly logical lol it's actually impressive to watch at times lol
What is better to be Muslim or athiest
To believe in reason or blind faith.
That everything is from nothing
@@qiiqamalmalka8050 that everything is vile in a human violence and ignorance deluded to the truth ...that's muslim
Irrelevant: I can't stop looking at how different his left eyelid is to his right eyelid
Thanks now i can't unsee it
Thanks for spoiling a series of nice videos for me
The question I thought was about a deistic god.
Namus Motorola I did to. I wouldn’t even say that he refuted religion all together tbh. I thought it was to messy of a actual response
same. But I shouldn’t be surprised, it’s Sam Harris after all and he always resorts to thinking about the unlikelness of the existence of Gods from man-made religions. It’s not dumb to think that there is a creator, actually I think based on current info that it’s the most intelligent position to take l. Even if we’re living in a simulation, then we have a God because we have a creator. Even if aliens made us in a basement, we have a God, because we have a creator. Etc etc
@@Christian-mn8dh creator = god. Bruh
@@John_Doe742 exactly.
@@crbobbyconstance He isn’t doing it wrong tho🤔. Cos answer this question honestly now, if there weren’t holy books nor religions, would the idea of God still be peddled as much?🤔
What an ignorant god they do worship...he made this flat, fixed in space earths first day on the second day. He created matter believing that light didn't 'already' exist at this point. He created a vial to hold the water up in the skies as not to flood the four legged insects and spiders, cud chewing rabbits. You would have thought the creator of the universe could have gotten at least one of these things right?
Sam Harris is just wonderful!!
I agree that the creation of the universe doesn't really matter in a daily applicable sense but it is something to consider. Until science can come up with some logical explanation for existence, the concept of a creator cannot be disregarded entirely. And your right, science is a fascinating subject, without science we would still be living in caves and dying at 30, but the belief in a creator does not hinder scientific development. Any applicable science needs not cross path with religion.
The main reason that I stand firm in my faith is because of my relationship with Jesus Christ. I pray all the time about anything. I talk to God like I would a friend. He answers back through the Spirit placed in my heart. He doesn't literally speak, but it is something that you should try because the experience is hard to explain.
Yes... so have I... but you seem to be a good person....I think I am also.... but please answer my questions... please...all my life... over 70 now....I believe... but I have questions that you may answer...I am serious....
#1... WHO/what created the earth... only the earth.
.#2... where is the Who/what...m?
Again...
Fascinating. You should write these experiences into a book.
If I were a religious person, I'd like to think I would be able to see the literal unquestionable logic in Sam Harris when he discusses such subjects and revaluate my beliefs. Sadly the religious people are so offended by his contrast of beliefs they ridicule these views other than consider them first.
I dunno, the way Sam Harris talks is very convincing. He convinced me :)
As a devout Catholic, some of my favorite people to follow are Sam Harris, Bill Maher, and Richard Dawkings. They just seem to be very intelligent people and make some very good points. I grapple with my religion all the time as well, but have never lost my faith.
I'm not a good christian apologist, so I won't try to defend my faith, there are religious people more knowledgeable who can do that. I guess I can just say that I don't believe the bible should be taken literally, to me, it never has. It's an oligarchical book of parables and stories designed to illustrate human nature and the ways that we may live our lives.
We also need to understand the context that it's a 2000 year old library of books written by different people who were inspired by God. Perhaps I'm a more moderate Catholic, and more conservative Catholics will have other opinions. Either way, I think that basically if you do well in life and are a good person, you won't go to Hell or anything like that. So, in my book, people like Sam Harris and Bill Maher and Richard Dawkings are not going to Hell to suffer any punishment, I think they are just misguided, and I hope God understands it as such. They are good people.
+Juan Veliz one of the biggest things for me is Evolution. If all the evidence toward evolution is true and I find it quite believable, then religion then doesn't quite work for me.
Your belief in Evolution is just another Belief based largely on Blind Faith!! So why arbitrarily choose to denounce one faith-based ideology only to believe another?!? I always saw the flaws of evolution and it is now being strongly challenged by Biology!! Most of you won't know this because it's at the forefront of science but evolution is in really big trouble at the moment and is under threat of being utterly annihilated as a belief!! And it's super funny that the thing threatening it is another field of science Lol
Above all, I just want you to realize that your belief in evolution is really nothing more than a belief based almost entirely on Blind Faith!! Maybe ask yourself "why" you CHoSE to have faith in one over the other... And it is just a matter of faith and nothing more!! You are simply taking someone else's word for truth with evolution and that's No different than being religious!! And For some reason, most people don't seem to realize that Materialism was thoroughly Debunked long ago!!
+Clint Eastwood Evolution is apart of the process. You need to question farther. Where did each species come from and trace it back and back and back. Eventually, you'll find it comes back to the Big Bang. What caused the Big Bang? In my opinion, God did. Not God in the sense that most people view "him" for he isn't a person at all. Think of God as a great over flowing energy that never is full of himself. Not in a narcissistic sense either. A literal sense. God is the orgin, the source of everything created in the universe, and God never stops flowing out.
+miamix24 Question everything you have heard before. Find out for yourself. Question your own beliefs and even the one I just wrote out. Find out and experience it for yourself, you'll see the truth. It has a funny way of revealing itself. Best of luck
It is still widely believed because humans will cling to anything that flatters their self-esteem and vanity. They are given (some) added courage by believing the universe is controlled by a being who shares their tastes and prejudices.
How is it impossible? The interesting part is that Muhammad (blessings etc.) was illiterate, and missionaries taught him to read and write using the Bible for examples of when and where to apply certain grammatical rules etc. Muhammad's native tongue, of course, was Arabic, so it's only a matter of circumstance that in order to test himself, he would have translated the book he knew best. Whatever alterations there are, he probably made to take into account evolving social norms and problems.
It's truly obvious that the Qur'an is manmade. An honest Christian would never be convinced by the Qur'an, whereas any honest Muslim will be convinced by the Bible. It becomes truly obvious to those who study both books.
The Qur'an claims to be a continuation but it conflicts with the Bible to such an extent that, in the 11th century, the Muslim scholar Ibn Hazm argued that the Bible was corrupted (because he believed the Qur'an's claim that it can't be corrupted, although the Qur'an also claims that the Bible cannot be corrupted, but I digress). Nowadays, many Muslims are taught Ibn Hazm's idea simply because they have to believe this to believe that the Qur'an isn't false, but the Qur'an still claims that the Bible cannot be corrupted. This results in the conclusion that the Qur'an is false for opposing the Bible it claims to be perfectly preserved. Also, Ibn Hazm claimed that the Bible must have been corrupted after the 7th century because Muhammad and the Qur'an claim that the Bible was perfectly preserved during Muhammad's time, but we know what the Bible said way before that time. Biblical manuscripts are the most numerous manuscripts in existence. In fact, they are so numerous that they many times outnumber all of the world's next 10 manuscripts combined. For example, just the Greek manuscripts of the New Testament alone already outnumber the next 10 manuscripts combined by two to one, and all of the manuscripts of the New Testament are four to five times as numerous as that. We know that the Bible was the same before Muhammad's time, so Muhammad was a false prophet who did not know what the Bible taught, which is the real reason why the Qur'an opposes the Bible, because the Bible never changed.
Unknown Brother, you seem to have a bit of confirmation bias. I've read the Bible, it lead me directly to atheism.
Idiot.
Amen, brother (pun absolutely intended). I could not have put it better myself.
Who REALLY thinks holy books are perfect? Where they agree is a good place to look for real truth, real wisdom and common sense.
Some books are not good but the quran is prefect and you will see god.and you wil live forever
Good for you, keep up the intolerance. All I can say for sure is that this world is so full of evil and of hate that I HAVE to believe in something or I wouldn't be able to get up in the morning. This all has to be for something, all the bullshit we put up with on a daily basis and all the horrible things that happen to people makes me seek refuge in the possibility of something more, something greater.
Does anyone know what the outro music is ?
I LOOOOOOVE how he refered to the matrix instead of unicorns, fairies or the flying spaghetti monster. I've steadily grown to hate hearing those in argument.
Indeed, simulation hypothesis and a higher power causing the Big Bang sound less ridiculous than the Flying Spaghetti Monster, the Invisible Pink Unicorn, or Russell’s Teapot
God is impossible for this reason
Who or what made God?
If you say he always existed,
In what reality or non reality did he exist , there must be no time before God , time and space must be created by God , if there is no time before God , there is no time for God to exist in. Conclusion there is no God. , notice I have given God a human nature which can not be as he would have existed before time and space .this leads ultimately to an infinite regression which is a logical fallacy.
Fernando Dosa I think the thing you have to consider when thinking about who or what made God is you would have to factor in the fact that He is a superior being(/race or whatever you would like to insert here); which means that He has a elevated level of knowledge and wisdom that we do not have. Think of it this way; if an advanced alien species were to visit Earth and tell us that they created a time machine and told us how they made one, it probably wouldn't make sense (or at least not at first). So, if God were to tell us how He is able to alter time and space, and how He is here, we probably wouldn't be able to comprehend it with our limited abilities. In other words, God is a higher, more intelligent and great being than we are in every way, shape, and form; thus meaning Him telling us how He is here, how He was able to create us, and how He is able to, for lack of better words, bend space and time, would probably overload our brain capacity and would render it unable to comprehend by us.
If we can not comprihend or even imagine such a consept. That is why I am an atheist and so should you that is to say I am not convinced such a thing exits. You have failed to provide any imperical evidence to warrant a guilty verdict. the only verdict is to find god not guilty.
Fernando Dosa First of all, you assume that I am religious and try to convince me of things which you do not know if I believe in or not. I was not trying to convince you of anything, nor was I stating any evidence to support religion of any kind. I was merely stating, while being unbiased of this topic, why these things are unknown if you go ahead and assume God is real. I was trying to provide an unbiased opinion on these things and am not trying to entice or provoke any sort of argument regarding religion. You have your beliefs and I have mine, and regardless of what I think is true, I will not judge you for your beliefs and I will not try to convince you of anything, so I would expect the same courtesy from you. Now if you wish to choose to continue to try and convince me of one thing, while you do not even know what my beliefs are, then by all means go ahead; however you will be the only one in the conversation. If you wish to continue with this discussion with me included, then I would ask you to be respectful and I will as well. So let's be professional about this and not act like children fighting over which car is better.
I have not used any durogatory language , as far as my beliefs , I believe a lot of things for witch I have good reason , you can believe things for bad reasons or good reasons , I try to believe as many true things and less false things as possible. My atheism is a question on does a god exist , for that question it is not a belief but rather a lack of a belief , example, I don't believe in Santa, fairies leprechauns big foot ,Zeus, Thor, put an A in front of those examples and you are expressing non beliefs.
I know you were not using any obscene language and I understand your grounds to constitute a lack of belief. I've gotten us off course of my original statement/topic and I apologize.
"Sam Harris refutes the notion of an intelligent creator."
Um no, one of the first things he said was that it's an unfalsifiable claim. This is why we can't have nice things...
Lol... Yeah, I didn't see where he refuted Anything at ALL except the idea that he is actually open-minded and doesn't adhere to arbitrary faith-based beliefs!! You can't falsify the existence of God... Exactly!!!!
@Adam Rath: An unfalsifiable claim means you cannot prove a creator exists. Nor could there be a possibility of one, as then you would have a proof, which could be falsified.
+Scott Smith It means that the idea of a sentient god either existing or not existing can only be based on speculative belief, as any "evidence" of either view is actually arguable for both sides, nullifying it. Just a merry-go-round with words...
@Adam Rath: That's what I said. :)
@Adam Rath: After re-reading your comment, I meant to say I agree with the first part of your statement - that the existence of god is speculative belief. However, the second part of your statement doesn't follow. If any evidence of either view is arguable for both sides, then you have a falsifiable claim. A contradiction is still evidence.
The bigger point here is that "right and wrong" don't come from the bible or "god" in the first place. It's based on how we view ourselves and what we want from our existence in relation to others in the first place.
Many people say that God answers their prayers with a yes, no or maybe, which is true, but like other people say, it doesn't prove anything.God does answer prayers in the way that benefits Him and them the most.The time that God always fulfills my prayers is when I ask Him for things that will benefit Him, not me.I ask for wisdom about Him,I get it.I ask for opportunities to spread His word,more were given than before,I asked Him to help me play guitar better for church and I became much better
What is the virgin Mary wasn't a virgin =0! What if she had an affair and was ashamed to tell Joseph!
Have you never heard the tale that she was raped by a Roman soldier named "Panthera" (who really existed for certain) and invented the immaculate conception story to cover it up?!? Not saying I believe it, just wanted you to know that the idea you mentioned has been around pretty much since the beginning of Christianity!! Check into it...
@Opethfullcovers: What's even better is the bible confirms she wasn't a virgin.
Just curious but where did it say that
hes so friggin hot and that voice soothing aas all get out
You are mantally ill
PART 6: There is so much more joy found in being obedient to God than not obedient. Sinning brings immediate and short-lasting pleasure, but serving God brings everlasting joy. People's lives will be so much more fruitful if they serve God instead of serving themselves. That is why many Christians are good people, why they go to church, why they pray and read the Bible. Because they love God and want to serve Him, but not because they have to.
prove god
horse manure
Sam Harris is like the 8th grader who asked my music class, "Can God create a rock so big he can't lift it?" The height of arrogance, to live surrounded by an infinity of perfections and yet, to belittle the reality of it by an all-knowing exceptionalism. For if God choose to never give the boy an answer, would he ever know the answer?
GOD --- COMMON HORSE SENSE
Without God, life would have no logic, meaning, hope or purpose.
Try and rationalize an existence without God, an exercise in futility.
Without God, life would be immoral, wrong, unjust, unfair, unequal, full of sin and evil.
With God, someday life will be moral, right, just, fair, equal, free of sin and good.
Without God, planet earth would have no purpose, for to overcome evil is it's only purpose.
I thought he was going to talk about the possibility of a creator. Instead he rambles on about religions. He's stuck in small box.
+1971SuperLead you only have to prove there is a creator. Since he can't prove a negative, he will refer to religious inconcistencies
LocoZiLLo Nothing in science is proven. It's why there's so much debate in science. All theories and facts are held as tentative. Nothing is beyond question.
The evidence for a creator is strong. But instantly turning to religion for the answer is not scientific. It's childish and even possibly dishonest. Does Sam have an atheistic bias or agenda? Religion has little to nothing to do with a scientific approach to researching the possibility of an intelligent creator behind the universe.
+1971SuperLead okay i'll bite , lets say there is a creator of the universe, what else are you willing to add to this notion...
the chikmiester Think about your nightly dreams. Is not your mind the Creator of the Universe you believe you are in when you are dreaming? Are not all the laws of physics in your dream simply caused by your own mind? Are not the walls solid simply due to your own mind? Is it not clear to you that the mind is quite capable of being a Creator? Can you see that it does this naturally, effortlessly and without your slightest awareness? Maybe it even enjoys imagining universes? Maybe you like to imagine universes and believing you are trapped inside them?
The next question should be, What makes you believe you aren't doing it right now? Or maybe, What makes you think you're not maybe in a collective dream, the Creator then being a collective of minds?
What makes you so sure you're not dreaming right now?
1971SuperLead A lot maybe's , nothing that functional in reality and i choose to live in reality.. I can ask thousands of these kinds of questions but my time is valuable..
Okay just one , what if you are a dumb person in delusion thinking you are smart...
we have tiny critters by the trillions inside of us, but do we know them? are we their god? no.. but if they are smart enough to know about us, they may worship us. and actually think we can hear them. Thats what i think everything is, i think our entire universe is just inside something living, and it is inside something living, an endless up and down cycle. and maybe even intertwined. who knows the very large may just be a representation of the very small. and size is just relative to your surroundings.
Die Atheists. Allah yah bah! (BOOM)
He perfectly evaded the question on creationism😅
I know. This guy is a fool.
There is hope for anyone, no matter how kind or evil they are, if they ask God to forgive them. There is nothing to lose, God's grace is a gift. So if when you die you have not asked God for His forgiveness, then your chance is up. But there is always hope no matter at what point in your life you are at.
You see this is a great example of why I put my faith in my God. He doesn't ask anything of humans. He will bring us to heaven regardless of what we have done. All we have to do is accept His gift. I should be able to keep this account, and God would still love me. You can never do anything that will cause God to stop loving you. If you ask God to forgive you for your sins, He will and you will go to heaven. That is an awesome God.
problem is there are 10000 gods ...
Not a well thought out statement from Sam. He is just too much in love with sound of his own voice.
You're absolutely right. A creator cannot currently be disproved, but since there's also no evidence to prove it either, it's kind of a moot point.
You also touched on a key point for Atheists, which is that science doesn't need to cross paths with religion. We can explain the world without Deities so we remove them from the EQ. The extremists of both groups make it seem like we hate each other, but most Atheists are tolerant of your beliefs, even if we don't personally agree with them.
You're totally right, Sam. There are several books in conflict. Now, a scientific approach would TEST the validity of each of the books. Why don't more people take the time to actually read the books so they actually know what they are rejecting? Instead, most cherry-pick verses to fit within their ideology. Real, true comparative analysis takes time and effort, and no one wants to do that. The main reason is most people are not actually looking for answers, but for excuses.
QUOTE: "So basic chemistry can write all the info in a DNA?"
Yes, also it can create oceans, mountains, planets, stars, galaxies and every structure in the known universe of any degree of complexity. It doesn't need intelligence to do this. Intelligence is but an outgrowth of this process.
I'm proud of you brother, debating through different ideas and sorting through them in terms of plausibility. I will however, say that many implausible theses were shown to be true when more evidences and supporting ideas emerged, so an idea should not be rejected simply on the basis of low probability or high incomprehensibility. I would say that the very fact that we have a tendency to move towards the truth and away from the false indicates that the truth does indeed exist and if there ever were a person of truth we would move towards him and not apart from him, that is, if we have ever had any disposition towards truth at all. And the truth will liberate us from coin toss situation because the truth is never probabilistically determined but always certainly derived.
@Greg adults with friends imaginary or real are better off than adults with no friends. I mean this sincerely.
This is The best video i’ve found yet about religion and its short af thank you sam
also I am not a student of Arabic, I am a native speaker. born and raised. and I have studied it enough to know what Kaffaro means.
It is people who have gone through hardship who love God the most. God is the rock that they stand firm upon, they do not fail and God gives them the strength to carry on. Life is not perfect and God isn't going to step in and make it that way, we have to take up our crosses and follow God until that day when there will be no more pain, no more suffering and God will wipe away every tear from every face.
We have a model of the world, such as "I'm typing now," "Sam Harris lives in California," and "I am sitting at home in Yamaguchi." All these are hypotheses which more or less correctly describe the world but the are only a model. Furthermore we are ourselves part of the model. But what of the reality? There is something outside of the model doing the modelling, where the model takes place. It is not "the brain." Brains too are part of the model. So, some people give that place a special name...
QUOTE: "If a man can embody two roles, why not the Creator?"
Don't be absurd, no one can literally be his own father or his own son. I fully understand the symbology behind the Father/Son/Holy Ghost mythology-- and the facile mind games that lie behind it.
He compared the principle behind these books, not the historical context surrounding them. It doesn't matter which book was written first and for how long, it doesn't change his point one bit.
for the purpose of dying on the cross to fulfill the law, pay for our sins, and break sins power over us.
Remarkable. What Sam Harris just said is that by accident of conception, he has been wholly determined from all eternity to be the locus of the thoughts expressed above, as well as all others he has ever entertained and believed, owing to utterly contextless, meaningless laws of necessity, themselves presented to his subjective experience, all ideas being equal. I don't find that incredibly complex explanation, hopeless abyssmal ignorance by definition, to be much improved over the alternatives.
I'm a Christian but I like him and he makes a good point
@sidgdansk it's called Chi Rho and it's a combination of the first two letters of the Greek word for “Christ"
Having ‘faith’ in only one way to ‘heaven’ is the easy route. People are are so brainwashed they are terrified to question anything in fear of ‘hell’. Questioning everything and searching for answers is the only way. Life is an individual experience not to be dictated by someone else. How much knowledge you gain is up to you alone. If you want to stop at one book and one belief...that’s on you.
In response to "mere accident of birth you are raised to believe that a certain book is the perfect birth". Just because someone is born into a house that believes in something does not justify the belief for the child. If someone was born in a house of alcoholics, that does not validate a license for the child to be an alcoholic. If no one in the family went to college, you don't expect the child to not try to achieve the truth and greater things.
Seeing the title of the video, I had the same idea many already commented about (that Sam Harris will actually consider a God) and felt some disappointment. But the more I think about it, the more I find "considering" a God/creator a difficult (impossible?) task to manage rationally, cause by doing so you actually conceptualize your own religion. Your guesses what the creator's plan is, how there may be lines between life and death, a soul, that we don't understand, wether the creator is to be worshipped or ignored... all of them are exactly that: guesses.
We know it for sure.islam is the truth.if you read the first pages.the second page you wil. Find there.this is the book from god.wich are no doubts
QUOTE: "Why is it morally good that the human race survive?"
Humans desire to survive becasue we have inherited that trait. If our ancestors hadn't developed and passed that trait on, they would have become extinct and we wouldn't be here to wonder about the nature of our desire for survival.
I live in Taiwan where we have powerful typhoons. When the same storms hit the Philippines nearby, dozens are killed. Filipinos are strong Christians while Taiwanese are more commonly Buddhist. The Philippines are riddled with corruption and poverty while Taiwan is comfortable, prosperous and safe.
Is yahweh answering the prayers or buddha? I have often wondered.
Your refusal on reading history is astonishing.
Christianity does not teach one to turn against his fellow man, its completely the opposite, and faith in a god does not imply blind ignorance to other aspects of the world. I do agree though that the concept of hell is not a good thing to install in a child. The principles of religion should be introduced in a professional manor so that the individual can make an informed decision.
It's not so much the irrationality of these ancient books, but rather the lack of consistency. What Sam said was that most of them seem to be in conflict with each other, specifically the abrahamic religion's holy books. They claim to have the same monotheistic god but they're ''Divine'' books are contradicting each other ad-nauseum which leads to the conclusion that either this ''God'' doesn't know what he's doing or he just doesn't exist. Which one is more likely?
These aren't reasons to not believe in God, they're just reasons to not believe in one religion at the exclusion of others.
the point was that believing in a creator is an unfalsifiable claim, and there can ultimately be no logical justification for believing an unfalsifiable claim.
And what about the people who see designs in nature and knows there always is a designer if there is a design created?
I am friends with a Christian named Dr. Richard Litke who was raised atheist and hated the thought of a cruel and distant God. How did this man become a Christian? Did he become stupid? Did he throw out his knowledge of science and logic and then study in prestigious universities teaching Greek and Arabic for years and earn a doctorate out of pure luck? I do think that it is very hard to believe in God, but explain the extremely intelligent man choosing Christianity over believing in atheism.
refusal to answer a straight question is a hallmark of the dishonest, well done
God does so many things for so many different reasons. Perhaps He wanted to take the people of the Philippines home to Him in heaven, while He is giving the people of Taiwan another chance to accept Him and so that they might praise Him for keeping them safe.
Do you often resort to narrow-mindedness when you come across something you do not fully understand? Do you resort to poking fun at someone's belief's when you have not researched or stepped in their shoes? What makes you the better person? And how does this comment make you feel better about yourself? I suggest opening your mind to your world before attacking the people in it with snide jokes.
The fact is no one knows what happens after death
That's usually the way these types of conversations go, in circles. It truly is a timeless debate that people have always and will always conduct. But just out of curiosity, how do you explain the existence of the universe? Not being a smart ass here, just curious.
You know what I meant Shinedown. You can't tell me that you know what was going on in "that dimension from which the Big Bang emerged." I can't tell you what was going on either. Therefore, not one of us can say that the universe DEFINITELY emerged from nothing or DEFINITELY emerged from something. All we can do is speculate. But I THINK that it emerged from something and not nothing based on reasoning, logic and science NOT religion. This is my opinion and it is not wrong.
its weird how for any argument and topic of controversy in life people are ready to indulge and come up with reasons for why they think a specific aspect is the right one however, when it comes to religion , the cognitive argument is why to even discuss the merits of any of the religions, as if it is assured that the right way to go about it is to just have this downward view of all believers and religions rather than examining them
0:58 false
1:06 false
Really? Isn't lack of believing or believing that jesus is the son of god considered manipulation by priests/imam's
julia Robert Not exactly. It really depends on the theologian. I am not an expert on Islam so I can't speak for them.
But Johannes Calvin actually said only an elect would be saved but no one could read the mind of God. Calvins theology left the possibility open for even non believers of Christ to be saved by Jesus. Origen actually had the idea of universal salvation over lifetimes similar to Hindu Karma.
The debate between Luther and Erasmus is very fascinating in its implications in regards to free will or not.
Even though I come out of the Calvinist tradition, and Paul Tillich has an expanded notion of this saying be open and universal salvation. Etc.
Most Christians actually have no concept of theological ideas they just follow whatever and don't think.
In my opinion the real problem with Contemporary Christianity is most have foreclosed on actually thinking and contemplating various ideas and values. There are 2000 years of many versions of Christianity and people stick to social conformity? That's the real problem. That's lazy idolatry not trying to understand a great mystery.
the actual quote. ""A human being is part of the whole called by us universe , a part limited in time and space. We experience ourselves, our thoughts and feelings as something separate from the rest. A kind of optical delusion of consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from the prison by widening our circle of compassion..." - Albert Einstein
perhaps it's just more respectful sounding than the causation being weakness and fear driving people to latch on to comfortable lies of immortality?
the point he exposes is that it is impossible to know which religion is the "right" one. there is no religion with 0 converts moving AWAY from it. or, no religion that people stop and stay at.
the cause. Another issue is the battle with contraceptives. That is Catholic in nature and does not extend to many denominations of Christianity, but realize that when you ask an individual to accept religion as a good thing, you are telling me to believe that it is okay for someone to spread the idea that contraceptive use is a mortal sin and as such should be punished. That is a ploy by the church to increase church membership. Islam does the same thing with promoting large family sizes.
There found it. If I recall correctly, the Lord rested on the Sabbath, doing no work. So the Sabbath would then be a resting day to praise God. So one working on the Sabbath would be giving God a massive finger on his decision to rest. However up until very recently (Historically speaking) resting on the Sabbath was possible. In modern society you can't and it's a silly rule anyway but it guaranteed one days rest a week for anyone working. So one can view that rule as one of the first unions.
QUOTE: "without a creators perspective, the atheists "knows" there is no right and wrong.. "
Atheists uphold traditional morals and soial norms when they are just and compassionate because what is good for society is good for the individual. Any morality found in religion was put there by humans, just as the knowledge in books was put there by humans.
I'm waiting. I'm not finding a difference in my life. Nothing is happening in my heart. I'm not changed.
So you are incurable?
I was looking forward to him speaking on this topic without a religious foundation. He totally redirected the question which was not presented as a religious belief. Gatekeeping at it's finest.
You actually have made very valid points and I admit to attacking you verbally out of emotion-driven incentives, and I apologize for such blatant and facetious comments towards you. It was unkind and ignorant. I only find it frustrating when someone "pokes fun" at something that I hold true to, and it is difficult when "hypocritical Christians" and gay protesters happen to be the ones that get my religion into trouble. I am supposed to love you, not judge you, and I apologize for my outburst.
I don't have an explanation for the existence of the universe, as science itself hasn't figured it out yet. Science isn't a perfect knowledge of everything, it's always growing, always improving itself. I'm okay with that personality, since let's be honest here, how the universe started really doesn't matter in our lives. What matters is how we live our lives and interact with one another.
As always, I love Sam Harris’ assessment and breakdown of these topics, but the question was about the possibility of the existence of a creator. While the claim that a creator exists is unfalsifiable, as he states, the answer to the question is still “yes.” There is a possibility that a god exists. Is it probable? That’s another question, which is what he seems to be addressing in this video.
As stated by Neil deGrasse Tyson, if there is a God (which in my opinion is 50/50 either it exists or it doesn’t) it’s either all powerful but not all good, or all good but not all powerful
Contrary to what you believe, simply calling someone an idiot doesn't progress the discussion at all.
Very interesting point. Since we are as you correctly say, we are "self-assembly" Since, unlinke machines, we can assemble ourselves, does that suggest to you, the OP or anyone, that we can model ourselves.
It seems to me that science is great. But that some giants have been caught up in it. Worms, rabbits and chimps are very complex, but their world view is probably not. If they were to think they were any part of their world model, they'd be very wrong.
How about us?
I would argue that other religions do not have a relationship with God because they pray because it is a requirement, they have a set number of times per day and many pray pre-written prayers. They have no relationship, and there is no way for them to know that they need Jesus Christ in order to. My relationship with God is this: I talk to God an uncountable number of times throughout the day pouring out whatever is on my heart to Him. I thank Him and I ask Him to help me with things
Converts discredit his argument that location determines you're religion. Yes if you're raised in a Christian family you're likely to take up that tradition, just like you're likely to take up certain their habits, preferred food, way of saying things, etc. But is that an argument concerning the validity of a religion. No. Location vs religion implies a correlation, not a causation.
When Sam says, "they were toiling in ignorance about the birth of the cosmos," it seems much descriptive of a naturalistic atheist than of a person of faith.
Faith, by definition, is ignorance!
@@Lonewolf--- I would not deny faith or ignorance in either of our belief systems... regardless of your belief. I just don't possess enough faith to be an atheist.
@@kylealford23 ---
You seem to have a profound misunderstanding of what an atheist is. Atheism has no "belief system," and does not involve "faith" in any way whatsoever. It is, in fact, the very lack of both of those concepts.
The key difference between the two parties, however, is that atheism is in line with science, which takes great pride in it's own ignorance, and continuously strives to overcome it with discovery of facts. Religion, on the other hand, is quite convinced that it already has all the answers, in spite of the fact that science continues to prove it wrong.
@@Lonewolf--- Hey man or woman, I appreciate your response. I think, however, you are confused on one point. Though atheism has no belief system, atheists do! All atheists make great assumptions; and life necessitates that we fill in the gaps that lie between the evidence and the observable. By faith (in textbooks, in the secular scientific community, in their logic and reason) they form a narrative about what actually corresponds to reality. A majority of atheists (including myself in a previous life) hold the belief that there is nothing supernatural, that the world started from nothing and had no cause, that life came from non-life, that biological evolution explains the diversity in the animal and plant kingdom. If you, personally hold any or all of these beliefs in your “belief system” then you have made some great intellectual commitments of “faith”. And you have likely put your faith in people that have great incentive (be it professional, financial or social) to disavow religious belief.
In regards to the scientific community… I love science. I have an advanced degree in science. And I will tell you unequivocally that the secular scientific world is anything but humble. They are politicized and will often fight tooth and nail for their doctrine. For example, if a new scientific discovery reveals a misconception about a long held evolutionary belief, removing it from a scientific textbook is nearly impossible (i.e. human gill slits in embryo). Your bold statements that science continues to prove religion wrong may have some truth in many specific instances. That is why it would be a fool’s errand to defend all “religion”. Certainly, not all “belief systems” have equal merit.
@@kylealford23 ---
Your assertion that atheism has no belief system, but atheists do, is illogical. Theism is the belief in the existence of a God or Gods. The prefix, "a," means "non." Therefore, an atheist is simply someone who does not belief in the existence of a God or Gods--nothing more, nothing less. Any interpretation beyond that simple definition is just a misrepresentation of the term. It does not involve a doctrine or belief of any kind, with regard to theism--it is the express lack of the same! That lack of belief stems from not being convinced that the theistic teachings are true--usually due to errors, contradictions, and a lack of supportive evidence in those teachings.
Your assertion that atheism requires faith in textbooks, the secular scientific community, or their own logic and reason. is also flawed. You are confusing faith with trust. Faith is belief without evidence--period! Trust, on the other hand is a level of confidence in something or someone, based on evidence. We've all heard the expression, "trust has to be earned." That is the key difference between the two concepts--trust has to be earned, faith does not!
With that in mind, atheists do indeed trust in certain people or things from time to time, but that trust is based on some form of evidence that those people or things are reliable--not blind faith. The assertions made in textbooks can be researched and verified. The findings of the scientific community are constantly subjected to peer revue, and are modified as needed, if new evidence dictates. The concepts of logic and reason are the very foundation of truth and reality, and as such, cannot be dismissed.
Finally, your references to the origin of the earth, life, and biological evolution, are subjects of which no-one yet has all the answers, and may never have. That does not, however, make it logical and rational to resort to the "argument from ignorance" approach, by blindly accepting the explanations of ancient religious texts--particularly when those texts are filled with extraordinary claims, containing errors, contradictions, and a lack of supportive evidence. One must remember that belief in Gods was simply mankind's first attempt to explain all of the things that he could not possibly understand. As our species has progressed, we have learned to use scientific methodology to examine those mysteries and reach conclusions based on logic and reason, which comply with and verify what we observe to be reality. For those questions for which we still do not have answers, our correct response is, simply, we don't know--yet!
Yes, there are those who would attempt to pervert science by subversive means, for their own personal gain, but that is why peer revue is used as a method of oversight, to minimize such behavior as much as possible. And most importantly--as previously mentioned--whenever mistakes or intentional misrepresentations are discovered in science, they are addressed and dealt with accordingly. The independent revue of such issues by scientists around the globe insures--even though it may take some time--that those errors are brought to light.
Religious texts, on the other hand are closed systems, which--aside from some minor variations in interpretation--are considered to be indisputable truth, which in most cases cannot be altered. That is where blind faith becomes a very necessary, but unreliable commodity. Some of us simply find that reasoning unacceptable!