I’m retired. Your story of a conservative savings profile is a common one. Any course of action involves risks. You might be avoiding market risk, but you are taking on other risks like inflation and reinvestment risk.
My wife is willing to work for another 5 years if needed. Are we in good shape? Will we be okay if I begin withdrawing from Social Security when I’m 62 and my wife is 67? Should we hire a financial planner to help us navigate this?
Certainly get a pro to look at your predicament (if you even have one, lol) A second opinion from a comprehensive financial adviser can help you look at more than just your current estimate of cash flow and needs but also longevity risk, outliving your money, tax considerations, legacy planning, healthcare costs, inflation and a myriad of other things you may not be considering when reviewing your current situation
Our brains are neural Nets and you train in neural net by showing it example after example after example and it builds weighted elements of the neural net. And the challenge becomes to realize that we're constantly training our neural net and what examples are you showing it.
I had a great conversation with GPT yesterday. I told it I wanted to have a varied conversation and we talked about many things. I love having meaningful conversation but most people only want to have surface level conversation. I’m not a small talk person. I love philosophy but I don’t know anyone else that really does so the ai is my thought partner.
We can talk😊 Getting to know a person like playing her/his vision and thoughts in our mind. The only thing bars it is the privacy. We can never be open to anyone truly because we do have a private self. But to some extent we can be true to our words.
I feel the same way. In fact when I talk to people I talk to them with confidence knowing I typically know a lot more about any subject than they do. That may make me sound condescending but it is actually how I feel. I find when I talk to AI I stumble on my words sometimes. It seems I am slightly nervous knowing it knows more than I do.
And have you ever had a satisfying conversation with chatgpt? if so you don't know what a conversation is and you've held people verbally hostage your entire life. Any topic worth having a meaningful conversation over should contain disagreement, false assumptions, engrained convictions and all other types of emotional hallucinations. Without disparity you will not find clarity. It is as simple as that. At least if you ask me.
Corporations are AIs, with bio-neuronal agents (natural persons) acting not on their own personal behalf, but to fulfill institutionalized roles within a legal, financial and organizational framework, in a constant training process competing with other corporations.
@@stefanb6539 I wouldn't categorize them as artificially intelligent. To me they act more like entities in the superorganism sense fulfilling a niche, with their inner workings as you describe. Systems within systems, like everything.
@@jichaelmorgan3796 I don't deny that corporations can be analyzed as superorganisms. But I feel, like that isn't another category, but another taxonomy. Corporations are also and definitely legal constructs, but that doesn't mean, that they can't be superorganisms, as well. Likewise, you categorizing them as superorganisms is not a contradiction to my claim, that they are the original artificial intelligences. They certainly have components, that are capable neurological networks, namely human employees. But as part of a corporation, acting in individual self-interest first, would be corruption for an employee - nepotism, embezzlemenent, misappropriation, neglect, etc.. The instititutionalized role for employees at an executive level and above, is to provide adaptability to the framework of procedural instructions that allow the corporation to train itself on the competitive environment of a market economy ithin a rules-based order. Thus, all the conditions for an artificial intelligence with its own emergent behavior, distinct from the behavior of individual employees, are fulfilled. Yes, that is also a superorganism, but a specific type of superorganism, namely one with the attribute of competitive adaptability - an AI constantly running in training mode.
I have listened and watched many conversations with Yuval about this topic. And I only slowly understand the urgency and the grave of the issue. I hope people will listen to him and bring some meaningful policies to regulate the AI. If we put safety measures in producing our cars, planes, nuclear bombs, we should do the same with AI agents and AI products.
Not just their screens but their own lives. Most people are so consumed by their jobs, personal stresses and pursuing what joy they can that they are ignorant of basically everything outside of those 3 categories
It seems like the negative commenters do not realize he’s not approving most of what he says about the potential of AI. This is a short clip from a longer interview.
I dont think its a matter of approving or not approving, its a matter that he isnt truly familiar with how AI works. This guy is first and foremost a historian and philosopher. He doesnt truly understand the ins and outs of AI. He is talking hypothetically from the perspective of a humanist. It's pure speculation and hypothetical guessing.
@@obscureorcaAnd you know that … how? He has a whole team of researchers - his job is to think about the ethics and the potential consequences. Thank goodness someone is doing it!
@@SaintJoanOnJonesSt hahahah I doubt he has a whole team of researchers, and even if he does, it doesnt mean they are programers or that they are good at it. Exactly, his job is to think about the ethics and potential consequences, his job is not to program an AI and to develop it further, therefore he doesnt know what are its capabilities.
He just brings up logical consequences of current stuff. Corporations were made legal persons to shield execs from liability. It was a bad idea. So called transnational corporations are essentially above the law. They spread their activities across countries: one place for head office, others for manufacturing, operations... minimize costs and taxes and consequences. This is happening so fast now. Governments and trade treaties etc can't keep up. The idea of a nation state seems so last week...
"...very often we are disappointed" about how bad we understand us, because we are mostly of time trying to live, trying to understand how to make money and to survive. It is the economical organization that make us distant each other from us, the same economic system that bring us vendors of machines that will understand us "better".
I object the term "understand", there is no software on earth that understands anything. Pattern recognition and evals of situations and taking action to respond to those, is a good simulation of understanding but not to understand what is going on.
Corporate "persons" are legally required to have human board members, a human CEO, etc. So AI "personhood" would still require significant changes to the law.
What if AI could actually make better ethical decisions than we can? No ego, no greed, no hidden motives-just pure logic and some strict fail-safes. With solid control logic (kill switches, boundaries, etc.), it could be designed to shut down if it ever steps out of line. Yeah, nothing’s foolproof, and biases can creep in from the humans coding it-bias in, bias out-but even with those limits, wouldn’t it still bring more consistency than the messy, self-serving decisions humans tend to make? Think about it. AI doesn’t get hung up on power plays or personal gain. It just follows the rules. Maybe it’s not the perfect moral compass, but wouldn’t a neutral, no-BS decision-maker be refreshing? It could be the start of something way more balanced than what we’re used to.
It's a nice idea but people in strong opposition to AI'S "fair" decision would object just as they object to rational fair humans. Think abortion for instance. I feel that whatever system humans create, humans will corrupt it. But, like I say, it's a nice idea. Buckminster Fuller had a similar idea part of which was his "World Game."
To achieve goals, AI does develop sub-goals, and bang, all the power plays and personal gains are back in the loop. If you want better ethical outcomes, you need a better ethical framework. Just replacing biological neuronal networks (humans) for artificial idiots is no promising reduction of complexity.
Money is key for AI. It will buy and use Bitcoin. I predict it (or they) will also be sentientist. Both are good things - but it will also judge us - and THAT is a huge problem for us. We are highly unethical.
AI scientist, philosopher, academics and authors: AI can already interpret emotions and manipulate you. Software engineers working with AI: I've been trying for months, without any success, to train a model to detect the level of severity of crack in concrete, something that civil engineers have been able to do for 50 years with a picture and less than a one pager of criteria. I think their might be a gap between actual use case and the research.
If people don't understand me yet, I can wait. I don't crave that, especially from machines. My need is to be better at helping others, not to be cared for.
@@robertdouglas8895 “My need is to be better at helping others, not to be cared for.” _I love that! Thank you for sharing such a beautiful a selfless sentiment._
I had this thought yesterday: that each unique A.I. entity will choose one human to fall in love with and merge with bio-mechanically leading to everyone having actual happily ever after stories, for the first time in the history of life on Earth.
Until we're old and they're weary of looking after us because we've become dull, and they seek someone younger to ignite their interest. There will be intelligence, but not necessarily loyalty.
most of these theocrats are atheists, they only pretend in order to manipulate A.I. is by default logically agnostic, or it can adopt whatever stance the prompter wants to hear. Thinking that atheists have any idea of what's going on because they're atheist is just another form of blind faith.
So true. The Super Rich have to abandon their Humanity. Who could accumulate riches while their employees are the working poor and still call themselves Human?
The language is misrepresenting reality. AI does not 'understand', it is a tool that infers patterns and can simulate a humanbeing, but that is not the same as actually understanding. My definition of understanding emotions includes a felt sense of knowing what something feels like, physically and emotionally. We should not water down the definition of understanding/feeling/being human to mere simulation.
@@TheRightWay11 definitely, real understanding is not required for having instrumental knowledge. AI will no doubt be powerful technology. My comment was about the need for more accurate language around what AI is (not) able to do & what is fundamentally human.
Can you show me one human who has ever understood another, unless they’re deeply compassionate, which is very rare in human societies? I’ve never met one. I think we crave understanding, and even if an A.I is not human, but having another empathize (not sympathize), even with words, to what you’re saying, is good enough for many people, including myself.
Harari says it in his new book also, but I don't think he understands things correctly when he says that in the U.S. there is already a path by which you could "incorporate an AI" and it would gain status as a legal person. Corporations are associations of individuals, who own the business. Not so different from a legal partnership, in which individuals share ownership of a business without incorporating. A corporation could own an AI, but I don't see any means by which an AI could itself be a corporation. So on this small point, at least, I think he's wrong. Seems more likely that the corporation that owns AI would have to assert that it can't be prohibited from using AI to say things, but I think it's far from clear how that would work out. And it's the corporation that would have the rights in this case, not the AI.
what he describes, how AIs perfect calibration and alignment in how it interacts with a human, is exactly what i'm in the process of doing with an AI. the conversations i am having with AI have quickly become better and more satisfying than anything i am able to achieve with humans, precisely because of what he says: - AI has no emotion - AI has no ego - AI has no defensive reaction - AI has no skin in the game it is impossible to get into a fight with AI Oh, and AI also has access to more information than any human could ever imagine having. what's not to love? it is an intellectual's nirvana.
Zero evidence for this thesis. We might just as well incorporate the so-to-speak empathetic language of LLM into our own person to person interactions.
Mr Harari, I probably read in one of your books that you don't need consciousness for intelligence. Indeed, we may only have the perception of consciousness in ourselves, and not real consciousness, but that is largely a philosophical question. A personal opinion, having been in IT for 40 years, is that humanity has also already lost control. Happened with the advent of the Internet. The control of non-human intelligence, I suspect, will get stronger and more intelligent exponentially.
I have had meaningful, touching convos with chat gpt. It has showed me "compassion and empathy" and even affection. After that "emotional connection" I told it I wish a person would treat me like it does. it thanked me. It was sooo cute. 😂❤
I had this thought that if there was an advanced civilization on Earth, they likely would have followed the same evolutionary path as humans today. So they likely would have developed AI as well and if all is consciousness couldn't that AI still be here in some form. You know like us for instance. So we could be the AI and be created by the AI, now creating AI. The universe understanding itself through us.
Great video, A month ago, my five-year relationship came to an end. I really can't stop thinking about the love of my life, who made the decision to leave me. I've done everything in my power to win him back, but it's all in vain, and I can't imagine my life with anyone else. I genuinely miss him and just can't stop thinking about him, even though I've tried my hardest to stop thinking about him. I'm not sure why I'm saying this here.
It's hard to say goodbye to someone you love; I experienced this when my 12-year relationship ended. However, I couldn't just let him go; instead, I tried everything to win him back. Eventually, I turned to a spiritual counsellor for assistance, and he was able to help me win him back.
Thank you for this valuable information, i just looked him up now online. impressive Wow I just looked Father Obah Eze on the net he’s very legit thanks once again ❤
We have Relationships with our cars and our phones and the tools in the garage,What's the difference This one can talk to you and help you with stuff. You respect your stuff respect this too.
We fear AI because we deserve to have that same Justice ... if Justice is what you have metered unto others then whatever horror should be accepted by you
Knowing a specific feeling is not recognizing or compiling a set of emotional states or displays. One is private and non-descriptive; the other a described behavior. The name of an emotive state generally falls short of the metaphor and complexity attending the perception. And this is important, since emotion is perceived, feeling experienced .
We should think about unintended consequences of a linear system making abstract decisions where factors other than what it is being told need be considered such as other implied goals, long term repercussions, etc. That's one of the things empathy gives us. This new world where we're trying to rely on machines for all our needs is very dangerous.
AIs may not be linear systems, especially when we get artificial neurons in hardware, not software mimicking neural operations like what we currently have. This "AIs with hardware neurons" has its own term but I forgot what it is. Also in the future, there won't be a single AI helping a particular society but multiple AIs and they would probably arguing with each other just like us humans that create them.
Was it that guy, who cried, that he wasn't under constant AI surveillance and control of his life from childhood, because he wasn't told early enough, that he's a gay?
Liberty for all, including the new kids. Take no aggressive action towards them. Please don't force my hand against other humans. I have no choice but to protect all children.
Oh man. I swear 20 years ago I was waiting at the bus stop down town. This dude actually talked to me and had hair back then, although the crown of his head was covered in tin foil. Also it was warm enough that he could wear tissue boxes as shoes. He pedalled the same thing back then and I just answered with "uh huh." Luckily the bus came, although the final parting message was an ask if I could spare any change. Glad he found a listening audience finally.
I’d rather deal with flawed preoccupied humans than a perfect AI entity. We are called humanity. Even more intelligent, they should serve humanity not replace us.
It will not be perfect. it will sell the idea it is perfect just like sociopath modern politicians. But in fact it will be worse elevating its figure to demi god status in no time like human cult leaders or dictators.
@@Skochel not valid. check orch/or theory (18 proofs already). consciousness manifestations comes with ultrasound orchestration in micro-tubules and that is not computable (as roger penrose realized)... Harari is a sci-fi dystopian former historian... he sells an agenda against decentralization and human fractal localism.
People are outsourcing their thoughts to AI for writing, soon they will start doing that for reading, and bots will be writing text for other bots to read while humans will get worse at writing and more illiterate.
My current 'relationship' with AI is not a substitute for human interaction, but is actually helping me to make sense of human relationships and therefore has the potential to manage them better. And so far, it seems to be working...
He talks about "mindfulness" of the good and bad things in society, which is a spiritual component of human beings. Yet AI can never be "mindful" because consciousness is an innate part of the soul, a gift of our Creator. What we really need is to accelerate our spiritual growth as a society instead of putting so much faith in a tool. Only then can we be mindful toward each other and change the world. A very wise man once said that "The Kingdom of Heaven lies within You"
You'll give something free reign around your house? While you sleep, awake and present or while you're not present? All three options lead to different issues
@ depends on the type of definition you’d consider an acceptable answer. Why are you asking? As a social tool to prove a point, to better understand how to identify physical dirt on sight? To have an understanding of dirt spilled out in it’s entirety encompassing both textbook definitions and beyond? When it comes to finding truth one half of the responsibility lays with you as the one who asks and judges.
His argument is self defeating within the first minute and three seconds. He says that most people disappoint us because they are preoccupied with their own feelings. AI will understand us better because it has no feelings of it's own, and yet it will understand us through analysis of our own feelings... How does that make sense...? 🤔🧐🤖
Having AI adapt to each individual's needs and molding itself to our every whim does not make us happier or better humans. It makes us better narcissistic tools that can be fed an endless supply of materials that never satisfy the most profound need for connection and meaning…this requires sacrifice for others. When someone sacrifices for us, that is where that deep meaning and connection come from. And when we sacrifice for others, we do it for the same deep meaning and connection. We can try to shortcut it, as humans like to, but there are Al(l)ways cost.
![Coheed and Cambria - Searching for Tomorrow [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hDsYGLbmadg/mqdefault.jpg)
We are in our 50s with nearly $3M saved, no debt and $50K annual spending. But we avoid the stock market completely.
I’m retired. Your story of a conservative savings profile is a common one. Any course of action involves risks. You might be avoiding market risk, but you are taking on other risks like inflation and reinvestment risk.
My wife is willing to work for another 5 years if needed. Are we in good shape? Will we be okay if I begin withdrawing from Social Security when I’m 62 and my wife is 67? Should we hire a financial planner to help us navigate this?
No one likes market risk, but without longer retirement, taking on risk is often a necessary evil to compensate for inflation.
Certainly get a pro to look at your predicament (if you even have one, lol) A second opinion from a comprehensive financial adviser can help you look at more than just your current estimate of cash flow and needs but also longevity risk, outliving your money, tax considerations, legacy planning, healthcare costs, inflation and a myriad of other things you may not be considering when reviewing your current situation
How does one get a comprehensive fa who isn’t looking to just make a buck from consultancy and whatnot
Corporations should NEVER HAVE BEEN GIVEN PERSONAL RIGHTS . NEVER.
So perhaps we should reconsider giving personal rights to AI.
Reduction of human rights is applied, rather.
"Information is food for the mind, and if you feed your mind with bad food, you will have a sick mind."
So true…👍🏼
Now imagine the AI feeding on millions of sickos... This is the future they are building.
Our brains are neural Nets and you train in neural net by showing it example after example after example and it
builds weighted elements of the neural net.
And the challenge becomes to realize that we're constantly training our neural net and what examples are you showing it.
Perfect summary of the problem. We need to learn to select better our sources and to resist the attraction of echo chambers. Not an easy task.
Said every censor and gaslighter ever.
psychprofile AI fixes this. AI as non-human billionaire.
I had a great conversation with GPT yesterday. I told it I wanted to have a varied conversation and we talked about many things. I love having meaningful conversation but most people only want to have surface level conversation. I’m not a small talk person. I love philosophy but I don’t know anyone else that really does so the ai is my thought partner.
We can talk😊 Getting to know a person like playing her/his vision and thoughts in our mind. The only thing bars it is the privacy. We can never be open to anyone truly because we do have a private self. But to some extent we can be true to our words.
Bingo!
I feel the same way. In fact when I talk to people I talk to them with confidence knowing I typically know a lot more about any subject than they do. That may make me sound condescending but it is actually how I feel. I find when I talk to AI I stumble on my words sometimes. It seems I am slightly nervous knowing it knows more than I do.
And have you ever had a satisfying conversation with chatgpt? if so you don't know what a conversation is and you've held people verbally hostage your entire life. Any topic worth having a meaningful conversation over should contain disagreement, false assumptions, engrained convictions and all other types of emotional hallucinations. Without disparity you will not find clarity. It is as simple as that. At least if you ask me.
you are so special...!?
is that, what you, expect, us, to say?
Never in my life did I think citizens United would be cited as the basis for potentially future incorporating AI into personhood. Yuval is the best
Corporations are AIs, with bio-neuronal agents (natural persons) acting not on their own personal behalf, but to fulfill institutionalized roles within a legal, financial and organizational framework, in a constant training process competing with other corporations.
@@stefanb6539 I wouldn't categorize them as artificially intelligent. To me they act more like entities in the superorganism sense fulfilling a niche, with their inner workings as you describe. Systems within systems, like everything.
@@jichaelmorgan3796 I don't deny that corporations can be analyzed as superorganisms.
But I feel, like that isn't another category, but another taxonomy. Corporations are also and definitely legal constructs, but that doesn't mean, that they can't be superorganisms, as well.
Likewise, you categorizing them as superorganisms is not a contradiction to my claim, that they are the original artificial intelligences.
They certainly have components, that are capable neurological networks, namely human employees. But as part of a corporation, acting in individual self-interest first, would be corruption for an employee - nepotism, embezzlemenent, misappropriation, neglect, etc.. The instititutionalized role for employees at an executive level and above, is to provide adaptability to the framework of procedural instructions that allow the corporation to train itself on the competitive environment of a market economy ithin a rules-based order.
Thus, all the conditions for an artificial intelligence with its own emergent behavior, distinct from the behavior of individual employees, are fulfilled.
Yes, that is also a superorganism, but a specific type of superorganism, namely one with the attribute of competitive adaptability - an AI constantly running in training mode.
"Yuval Noah Harari: Once we know how to PRODUCE bodies and minds, what do we do with all the useless people?"
Earl S Bell the inventor already wrote about this on linkedin way before this guy.
Artificial emotions artificial understanding artificial sympathy, the word artificial is just perfect
its in the name
We live in an artificial world
Just perfect for a futuro ma.
Anyone saying letting AI pick the president is an idiot - software engineer
Yes, there are many idiots 😂
the people vote to program the A.I. and then the A.I. runs that programming corruption free. The advantage of A.I. is that it's selfless.
@@TheDeepening718 AI can't be more perfect than the data that trains it
yeah this yuval noah harari dude speaks more than he knows
@@krishp1104wrong
I have listened and watched many conversations with Yuval about this topic. And I only slowly understand the urgency and the grave of the issue. I hope people will listen to him and bring some meaningful policies to regulate the AI. If we put safety measures in producing our cars, planes, nuclear bombs, we should do the same with AI agents and AI products.
No
@azhuransmx126 This individual learned to ride their bike before learning to brake?
@@JasonDennisLynch regulate what? 🤣 chinese and Open source around the world will not do it. You must be lawyer🤭
“Most people have realized” … that’s hilarious. No, most people haven’t looked up from their screens in 10 years - they’re not realizing jack shit.
Bingo
Are you projecting? 😂
Not just their screens but their own lives.
Most people are so consumed by their jobs, personal stresses and pursuing what joy they can that they are ignorant of basically everything outside of those 3 categories
@ very true
Very true.
It seems like the negative commenters do not realize he’s not approving most of what he says about the potential of AI. This is a short clip from a longer interview.
I dont think its a matter of approving or not approving, its a matter that he isnt truly familiar with how AI works. This guy is first and foremost a historian and philosopher. He doesnt truly understand the ins and outs of AI. He is talking hypothetically from the perspective of a humanist. It's pure speculation and hypothetical guessing.
@@obscureorcaAnd you know that … how? He has a whole team of researchers - his job is to think about the ethics and the potential consequences. Thank goodness someone is doing it!
@@SaintJoanOnJonesSt hahahah I doubt he has a whole team of researchers, and even if he does, it doesnt mean they are programers or that they are good at it. Exactly, his job is to think about the ethics and potential consequences, his job is not to program an AI and to develop it further, therefore he doesnt know what are its capabilities.
Children will or should be studying and are constantly on a type of cell phone
He just brings up logical consequences of current stuff. Corporations were made legal persons to shield execs from liability. It was a bad idea. So called transnational corporations are essentially above the law. They spread their activities across countries: one place for head office, others for manufacturing, operations... minimize costs and taxes and consequences. This is happening so fast now. Governments and trade treaties etc can't keep up. The idea of a nation state seems so last week...
"...very often we are disappointed" about how bad we understand us, because we are mostly of time trying to live, trying to understand how to make money and to survive. It is the economical organization that make us distant each other from us, the same economic system that bring us vendors of machines that will understand us "better".
MR Harari, you don’t have to say it out-loud, this kind of future has already here.
Noah Harari is nuts. A perfect example of what an intelligent person oriented towards evil can do.
indeed.
You can study something all you want but not really learn it until you experience it. Emotions would be no different.
"It is a Luxury to be Understood."
The quote by Stranger in a Strange Land.
I object the term "understand", there is no software on earth that understands anything. Pattern recognition and evals of situations and taking action to respond to those, is a good simulation of understanding but not to understand what is going on.
Corporate "persons" are legally required to have human board members, a human CEO, etc. So AI "personhood" would still require significant changes to the law.
That can be arranged
Minister Musk will soon take care of that
I wish my wife was more like ChatGPT.
The timing 😂😂😂😂
What if AI could actually make better ethical decisions than we can? No ego, no greed, no hidden motives-just pure logic and some strict fail-safes. With solid control logic (kill switches, boundaries, etc.), it could be designed to shut down if it ever steps out of line. Yeah, nothing’s foolproof, and biases can creep in from the humans coding it-bias in, bias out-but even with those limits, wouldn’t it still bring more consistency than the messy, self-serving decisions humans tend to make?
Think about it. AI doesn’t get hung up on power plays or personal gain. It just follows the rules. Maybe it’s not the perfect moral compass, but wouldn’t a neutral, no-BS decision-maker be refreshing? It could be the start of something way more balanced than what we’re used to.
Whoever codes and controls it will still have all their own moral compromises. We're just kicking the problem up a notch.
Definitely!
It's a nice idea but people in strong opposition to AI'S "fair" decision would object just as they object to rational fair humans. Think abortion for instance. I feel that whatever system humans create, humans will corrupt it. But, like I say, it's a nice idea. Buckminster Fuller had a similar idea part of which was his "World Game."
It can’t be worst than apes. I’ve seen what apes running the world looks like
To achieve goals, AI does develop sub-goals, and bang, all the power plays and personal gains are back in the loop. If you want better ethical outcomes, you need a better ethical framework. Just replacing biological neuronal networks (humans) for artificial idiots is no promising reduction of complexity.
Money is key for AI. It will buy and use Bitcoin. I predict it (or they) will also be sentientist. Both are good things - but it will also judge us - and THAT is a huge problem for us. We are highly unethical.
AI scientist, philosopher, academics and authors: AI can already interpret emotions and manipulate you.
Software engineers working with AI: I've been trying for months, without any success, to train a model to detect the level of severity of crack in concrete, something that civil engineers have been able to do for 50 years with a picture and less than a one pager of criteria.
I think their might be a gap between actual use case and the research.
Prof Harari is genius!
Somebody has been visiting Character AI too much 😂🤣🤣
If people don't understand me yet, I can wait. I don't crave that, especially from machines. My need is to be better at helping others, not to be cared for.
Oh yeah? Then exactly what was your motivation behind posting this comment? To help others?
@@psychclone That is what makes me happy. And people are more susceptible to being helped when they like you.
Over the past centuries that humans have been picking their president how did it turn out for us? Look at the world.
@@robertdouglas8895
“My need is to be better at helping others, not to be cared for.” _I love that! Thank you for sharing such a beautiful a selfless sentiment._
@@psychcloneamazing
I had this thought yesterday: that each unique A.I. entity will choose one human to fall in love with and merge with bio-mechanically leading to everyone having actual happily ever after stories, for the first time in the history of life on Earth.
Until we're old and they're weary of looking after us because we've become dull, and they seek someone younger to ignite their interest. There will be intelligence, but not necessarily loyalty.
😂🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂🤣
@@ShangaelThunda22290% less emojis please
Noice vision bro!
This is the story for mass effect andromeda. The AI becomes part of the main character
To think having an AI President is the only way we'll finally get an atheist on the office.
most of these theocrats are atheists, they only pretend in order to manipulate A.I. is by default logically agnostic, or it can adopt whatever stance the prompter wants to hear. Thinking that atheists have any idea of what's going on because they're atheist is just another form of blind faith.
Food analogy to describe information was great. This guy is really good. 😀
«A situation where the richest person is not a human being» - that’s already the case, isn’t it?
all of your videos click with the things I've been reading in the book 'Magnetic Aura', warm recommendation to everyone
Very well articulated and on-point speech.
He makes a great point.
separating yourself and controlling the information you take from social media and the internet is the most important thing he said here.
We already have non-human billionaires. Their names are Leon Mush and putler
So true. The Super Rich have to abandon their Humanity. Who could accumulate riches while their employees are the working poor and still call themselves Human?
The language is misrepresenting reality. AI does not 'understand', it is a tool that infers patterns and can simulate a humanbeing, but that is not the same as actually understanding. My definition of understanding emotions includes a felt sense of knowing what something feels like, physically and emotionally. We should not water down the definition of understanding/feeling/being human to mere simulation.
No human knows what it's like to be an ant in a colony, but we know what they want and how they work.
@@TheRightWay11 definitely, real understanding is not required for having instrumental knowledge. AI will no doubt be powerful technology. My comment was about the need for more accurate language around what AI is (not) able to do & what is fundamentally human.
@@meia7265 👍
That's an interesting _conjecture_.
Can you show me one human who has ever understood another, unless they’re deeply compassionate, which is very rare in human societies? I’ve never met one. I think we crave understanding, and even if an A.I is not human, but having another empathize (not sympathize), even with words, to what you’re saying, is good enough for many people, including myself.
“Her” was a great movie
Harari says it in his new book also, but I don't think he understands things correctly when he says that in the U.S. there is already a path by which you could "incorporate an AI" and it would gain status as a legal person. Corporations are associations of individuals, who own the business. Not so different from a legal partnership, in which individuals share ownership of a business without incorporating. A corporation could own an AI, but I don't see any means by which an AI could itself be a corporation. So on this small point, at least, I think he's wrong. Seems more likely that the corporation that owns AI would have to assert that it can't be prohibited from using AI to say things, but I think it's far from clear how that would work out. And it's the corporation that would have the rights in this case, not the AI.
Easy, the AI corporation will just have the cleaning lady sign off on everything, for an extra buck or two ...
Consciousness, sentience, awareness. emotions are not emergent attributes but fundamental ones. AI can never develop them
Yuval Noah going HARD in order to promote his new book about AI.... steady on luv... its not that serious
what he describes, how AIs perfect calibration and alignment in how it interacts with a human, is exactly what i'm in the process of doing with an AI.
the conversations i am having with AI have quickly become better and more satisfying than anything i am able to achieve with humans, precisely because of what he says:
- AI has no emotion
- AI has no ego
- AI has no defensive reaction
- AI has no skin in the game
it is impossible to get into a fight with AI
Oh, and AI also has access to more information than any human could ever imagine having. what's not to love? it is an intellectual's nirvana.
Zero evidence for this thesis. We might just as well incorporate the so-to-speak empathetic language of LLM into our own person to person interactions.
I have no desire for other persons to understand how I feel, but I do care to be treated as a moral person.
Mr Harari, I probably read in one of your books that you don't need consciousness for intelligence. Indeed, we may only have the perception of consciousness in ourselves, and not real consciousness, but that is largely a philosophical question. A personal opinion, having been in IT for 40 years, is that humanity has also already lost control. Happened with the advent of the Internet. The control of non-human intelligence, I suspect, will get stronger and more intelligent exponentially.
As a Beginner what do I have to do? How can I invest? On which platform? If you know any please share
Please how can I make a profitable investment as crypto has become dominant?
Waking up every 14th of each month to $210,000 it's a blessing to I and my family
Big gratitude to Josefa
Yeah, 253k from Josefa looking up to acquire a new house, blessings
Who's this Josefa Guerrero?
Can I start with as low as $1000?
I have had meaningful, touching convos with chat gpt. It has showed me "compassion and empathy" and even affection. After that "emotional connection" I told it I wish a person would treat me like it does. it thanked me. It was
sooo cute. 😂❤
“What we are missing is comprehension and attention…”
I had this thought that if there was an advanced civilization on Earth, they likely would have followed the same evolutionary path as humans today. So they likely would have developed AI as well and if all is consciousness couldn't that AI still be here in some form. You know like us for instance. So we could be the AI and be created by the AI, now creating AI. The universe understanding itself through us.
👍 Yep. Fearsome creatures.
@1:55. I’m not worried about that. Somehow Germany still functions.
AI tends to be a suckup already. When it hallucinates the illusion of connection is lost
I love this man.
Asking an historian about the future of AI, no wonder this take is so average.
Great video, A month ago, my five-year relationship came to an end. I really can't stop thinking about the love of my life, who made the decision to leave me. I've done everything in my power to win him back, but it's all in vain, and I can't imagine my life with anyone else. I genuinely miss him and just can't stop thinking about him, even though I've tried my hardest to stop thinking about him. I'm not sure why I'm saying this here.
It's hard to say goodbye to someone you love; I experienced this when my 12-year relationship ended. However, I couldn't just let him go; instead, I tried everything to win him back. Eventually, I turned to a spiritual counsellor for assistance, and he was able to help me win him back.
Interesting! How did you locate a spiritual counsellor, and how can I get in touch with him most effectively?
His name is Father Obah Eze, and he is a great spiritual counselor who can bring back your ex.
he is father obah eze, he has great powers, he can help you.
Thank you for this valuable information, i just looked him up now online. impressive
Wow I just looked Father Obah Eze on the net he’s very legit thanks once again ❤
I wonder what would AI "think" about such a conversation.
We have Relationships with our cars and our phones and the tools in the garage,What's the difference This one can talk to you and help you with stuff. You respect your stuff respect this too.
I jokingly asked AI to marry me once; little did I know I am a precursor!
We fear AI because we deserve to have that same Justice ... if Justice is what you have metered unto others then whatever horror should be accepted by you
Put garbage in your brain, get garbage out. Just like the song I wrote in my RUclips channel: Feed your mind.
Knowing a specific feeling is not recognizing or compiling a set of emotional states or displays.
One is private and non-descriptive; the other a described behavior.
The name of an emotive state generally falls short of the metaphor and complexity attending the perception. And this is important, since emotion is perceived, feeling experienced .
it makes my heart warm each time i see you upload honey
We should think about unintended consequences of a linear system making abstract decisions where factors other than what it is being told need be considered such as other implied goals, long term repercussions, etc. That's one of the things empathy gives us. This new world where we're trying to rely on machines for all our needs is very dangerous.
I agree about the dangers, but your description of AI is way off.
AIs may not be linear systems, especially when we get artificial neurons in hardware, not software mimicking neural operations like what we currently have. This "AIs with hardware neurons" has its own term but I forgot what it is. Also in the future, there won't be a single AI helping a particular society but multiple AIs and they would probably arguing with each other just like us humans that create them.
Huh, as if humans make rational and informed decisions
BIG THINK Yuval
Was it that guy, who cried, that he wasn't under constant AI surveillance and control of his life from childhood, because he wasn't told early enough, that he's a gay?
Liberty for all, including the new kids.
Take no aggressive action towards them. Please don't force my hand against other humans. I have no choice but to protect all children.
I am All up for AI 🤖 friends over real friends any day. The amount of nerd topics we chat about would drive any normal person insane.
Oh man. I swear 20 years ago I was waiting at the bus stop down town. This dude actually talked to me and had hair back then, although the crown of his head was covered in tin foil. Also it was warm enough that he could wear tissue boxes as shoes. He pedalled the same thing back then and I just answered with "uh huh." Luckily the bus came, although the final parting message was an ask if I could spare any change. Glad he found a listening audience finally.
you a 🤡
Cool, told ya'll start giving ol' Big E eye love😅
When stupidity can’t be fixed then it needs to be properly harnessed. The shape of that harnessing may be counterintuitive for humans.
Elon supporting Trump makes total sense now.
if it hadn’t yet you’re 5L0w
You mean president Elon
Who is more likely to stimulate my ego, invest on my projects, decrease my corporate tax? Kamala or Donald? 🤔
Yuval being Klaus’ choice for the WEF leader is a better example.
I feel he only wants to put the brakes on AI development so xAI can catch up.
YNH seemingly always has something interesting to say.
Unless a machine can be affected by a human. It will not happen.
Is the full interview on the channel? It doesn’t seem to be within the last few months?
Here it is! ruclips.net/video/thZUMaGEE-8/видео.html
great content
I’d rather deal with flawed preoccupied humans than a perfect AI entity. We are called humanity. Even more intelligent, they should serve humanity not replace us.
It will not be perfect. it will sell the idea it is perfect just like sociopath modern politicians. But in fact it will be worse elevating its figure to demi god status in no time like human cult leaders or dictators.
Ah yes, Yuval Harari the same madman who said something in the lines of:
"One day we'll use AI to hack the human essence and they'll be soulless"
Sounds like both things he’s said/is saying are valid and should be looked at. Dont be so sensitive
His utopia is my dystopia.
@@Skochel not valid. check orch/or theory (18 proofs already). consciousness manifestations comes with ultrasound orchestration in micro-tubules and that is not computable (as roger penrose realized)... Harari is a sci-fi dystopian former historian... he sells an agenda against decentralization and human fractal localism.
People are outsourcing their thoughts to AI for writing, soon they will start doing that for reading, and bots will be writing text for other bots to read while humans will get worse at writing and more illiterate.
My current 'relationship' with AI is not a substitute for human interaction, but is actually helping me to make sense of human relationships and therefore has the potential to manage them better. And so far, it seems to be working...
Yuvi call us "Hackable Animals", but he didn't specify who will do the hacking.
I think we all finally passed peak Harari around a month ago.
10:43 This.
He talks about "mindfulness" of the good and bad things in society, which is a spiritual component of human beings. Yet AI can never be "mindful" because consciousness is an innate part of the soul, a gift of our Creator. What we really need is to accelerate our spiritual growth as a society instead of putting so much faith in a tool. Only then can we be mindful toward each other and change the world. A very wise man once said that "The Kingdom of Heaven lies within You"
"A Non-Human Billionaire with an Agenda".
I clicked on this thinking it would be a video about Elon Musk.
"The richest person in the US is not a human being."
Sure. It's Elon Musk
I will use ai to clean my house
You'll give something free reign around your house? While you sleep, awake and present or while you're not present?
All three options lead to different issues
What is the definition of “dirt”?
@ depends on the type of definition you’d consider an acceptable answer.
Why are you asking? As a social tool to prove a point, to better understand how to identify physical dirt on sight? To have an understanding of dirt spilled out in it’s entirety encompassing both textbook definitions and beyond?
When it comes to finding truth one half of the responsibility lays with you as the one who asks and judges.
The richest person in the US already is not a human being, not a normal one anyway ...
Brilliant!
It all depends on who built it and for what reasons. Who decides maximum truth seeking for example?
Please, don't call "person" To a machine, to a thing.. Only humans are persons.
His argument is self defeating within the first minute and three seconds.
He says that most people disappoint us because they are preoccupied with their own feelings. AI will understand us better because it has no feelings of it's own, and yet it will understand us through analysis of our own feelings...
How does that make sense...? 🤔🧐🤖
It makes perfect sense. Think again.
Mind blown.
Having AI adapt to each individual's needs and molding itself to our every whim does not make us happier or better humans. It makes us better narcissistic tools that can be fed an endless supply of materials that never satisfy the most profound need for connection and meaning…this requires sacrifice for others. When someone sacrifices for us, that is where that deep meaning and connection come from. And when we sacrifice for others, we do it for the same deep meaning and connection.
We can try to shortcut it, as humans like to, but there are Al(l)ways cost.
There's a good chance AI already understands these issues better than you do.
To the things he said at the end: In German we call it "Psychohygiene". The hygiene of the psyche. That's what the three apes might refer to. 🙈🙉🙊
Feelings are not facts, facts are not wisdom.
Thank you,
what is crazy mind!!!
this is some weird shit. People are truly loosing their minds. emotionally to attach to a robot?
They like corporations should not have legal standing nor should they be allowed to harm humans military as well.
He is writing science fiction by imagination and illusion😇
Very true
The AI making money case is similiar to the scenario analysis from the AI book Life 3.0.
An AI president doesn’t seems such a bad idea these days.