Thank you Atty. and Dr. Duka for your short and sharp lecture covering comprehensive subject matters. God bless you as you've been a blessing to a score of law-lover individuals. ☺️
Thank you so much Atty. Duka for providing these comprehensive video lectures (cost-free). I have been watching your videos to supplement my study in Political and Labor Law. I have grown a better understanding and love for this subjects thanks to your lectures. God Bless po Atty.!
Done with Consti and PIL. Now listening to Labor Lecture. Thank you Dean💕! Nalipong na kos kadaghan. So better simplified. I have decided to use your lectures and codals for prep materials.
Thank you so much Dean. I've been using this lecture/watching over and over as additional material for labor relations since start of sem Thank you so much. PS: At first I don't seem to love labor, but I found it interesting because of your lecture Dean and of course your jokes hahaha
Good Evening Atty. Cecilio Duka. I am Grace Velasco from PUP Paranaque Campus, BSOA student. I was looking for a speaker for our webinar this semester. I would like to invite you as our guest speaker. I hope through this message you will notice me and grant my request. Thank you!
Thank you so much po sir! Sumasakit ulo ko kakabasa mababa kasi comprehension ko but with your video I am able to study Labor Relations habang nakangiti. Tawang tawa pa dn ako sa jokes mo kahit medyo gasgas na dun sa ibang lecture mo. Hahahaha
Good day sir...ano po pwede nmin gawin if may union samin at nag paratify sa rank n file employees at need nila makuha ang 50+1%. This is what happend they submitted the ratification for registration ans certification...the csc grant thier ratification and issued a certification to the management...question sir as an interested party we found out that thier list of signatories is fraud/falsified. .they did not reach 50+1% sa csc or sa labor po ba kami dapat mag file ng petition? Pwede po ba ma revoke ang certification nila...meron po kaming ebidensya ng list of signatories nila.. Thank you po...salamat sa lectures nyo👍
Thank you, Atty. for sharing your online lectures in YT. Your lectures in PIL helped me perform well in my PIL class this sem. Sir, I have questions regarding labor. Are contractual employees working in LGUs or other government institutions entitled to security of tenure when the functions of said contractual employees are necessary and desirable in their designated offices? I am a job order employee in LGU for almost 2 years, with every 3 months that my contract is renewed. I work as a writer and researcher and I perform tasks that are necessary and desirable in the functions of the office where I am assign to. Also, what law covers job order employees working in the government sector in terms of their rights and welfare, is it the Labor Code, or CSC? Thank you very much sir and more power to you po. :)
JO and COS in govt including LGU's are sui generis not covered by cs law or labor code. if they have a contract then its governed by civil code. the enforcement of which belongs to the regular court. that is a sad reality they do not have security of tenure
@@CDDukaLaw Yes Dean. Thanks. Dean, with all due respect po, meron lang akong kunting comment dun sa pagbanggit mo in the lecture that the soldiers, policemen, firemen and jailguards are not allowed to strike, which is correct naman. Ang concern is not on the proscription but on the term that is used to refer to us. We are jail officers po kasi, not jailguards. Mali po kasi yun. One may argue that it is what has been used for long. Maaring ganun but it doesnt mean na tama na ang isang bagay dahil matagal na ginagamit ito. Why is it wrong? It is wrong po for the followings: 1) I know that you know RA 6975, the same law that created the DILG and the agencies under it, including the PNP, BJMP and BFP.. Nowhere in that law that referred to us as jail guards, 2. The term is limiting. eligible
@@CDDukaLaw Thank you Dean for duly noting it. The reason why I raised it precisely because it's a matter of terminology po. By philosophical definition, we all know that terminology is a discipline that systematically studies the "labelling or designating of concepts" particular to one or more subject fields, ideas, groups or domains of human activity. Corollary to that, the use of standard, common, particular or right terminology is essential to ensuring efficient, clear communications and proper dissemination of meaningful messages. Anyway, thank you po for not using it, in fairness, in a derogatory manner. We appreciate it. Stay safe and God bless.
Rondolf S. Mabazza Atty. Isa na rin po akong Union President dto sa school kya nung nakita ko youtube mo paulit ulit ko pinapanood Nadagdagan po yung Kaalaman ko na nman dahil po se Lecture nyo magalingtlga kyo Sir isa kyo Prof Ko hinahangaan ko at pati yung porma nyo po malupet 1995 kita naging prof sa foundation of Education 1 po
Blessed afternoon ATTY. DUKAS, I just would like to be enlightened if it is lawful to make the last 15 days of salary be a part of the quit claim ? Thank You.
A and B filed a petition for certification election. Their petition was granted but they lost in the election as majority of the employees voted for “no union”. The next day, they failed to report for work. They claim that they were barred from entering the premises. They filed a suit for illegal dismissal and back wages. The company denied these allegations and alleged that A and B refused to return to work despite their attention being called. Were A and B legally dismissed? What is the answer?
What is possible answer Company Y is engaged in road construction projects of the government. It engaged the services of certain workers to work on various projects on different dates. Several of its workers joined Union A as members. Union A filed a motion for certification election with the regional office. Company Y opposed stating that the workers were project employees and not qualified to form part of the rank and file collective bargaining unit. Later, Company Y terminated the employment of the workers due to the completion of its projects or the expiration of worker’s contracts. The affected workers claimed they were dismissed because of their union activities; and thus staged a strike. The strike was declared illegal and the workers were deemed to have lost their employment status. Were the workers validly dismissed.
wala sa labor code yan. sa sss law may death at burial benefits sya. check din kung may company policy or collective bargaining agreement tungkol sa death benefits
Atty.maganda araw po ask ko lang po Nadisgrasya po ako sa work nabali kamay ko binuksan katawan ko anghaba po ng tahi at natanggalan po ako ng organ. Humihingi po ako ng danyoa sa agency pwede kopo ba ibring up yong 1.2M sa kanila kasi dinapo ako makapag work sa kalagayan ko
Hehe yes Dean! Sa last minute review ko po sa 1st week ng bar, ito lang papanoorin ko para sa Labor. Napaka-comprehensive di mo na kailangang pahirapan pa sarili mo sa last minute tips hehe.
Madam my tanung po ako regular po kame sa trabaho as a merchandiser agency po my hawak same tapos ung agency my client ngaun po ung client po namen umalis sa agency lumipat sa ibang agency ngaun po ung agency po na pinapasukan po namen pinagforce resign po kame lahat ng empleyado para po maabsorb sa nilipatan ni client ngaun po pagdating po namen sa bagong agency namen reapply po kame apply po ulit kame apply na parang bagong aplikante ulit atty ang tanung ko po my makukuha pa po ba kaming seperation pay sa dati namen na agency kase force resign po kame mawawala po kame sa pinapasukan namen kung ndi po kame magreresign at maflouting po kame sabi ni dating agency ko po atty may habol po ba kame sa dati naming agency? 100+ po kase kaming empleyado sa agency namen na nagsabay sabay na nagresign dahil sa ndi kame maabsorb sa new agency namen kung ndi po kame magresign
una hindi ako madam... lalaki ako at abogado hindi abogada ok? pangalawa kung nagresign kayo at voluntary eh wala kayong mahahabol sa agency nyo. kung sa tingin nyo napilitan lang kayo magresign at hindi kusang loob eh pwede ka at mga kasama mo magfile ng reklamo sa national labor relations commission ng kasong illegal dismissal
@@CDDukaLaw I'd love to buy that book po and I'll be sure to get it. May I know any situation or is there news article about the check off issue please?
@@CDDukaLaw ever since I watched your video po. I've been curious of whether there are current issues under article 250. So, I have been searching in the internet po. There are few information information regarding it.
Art. 299. Disposition of pending cases. All cases pending before the Court of Industrial Relations and the National Labor Relations Commission established under Presidential Decree No. 21 on the date of effectivity of this Code shall be transferred to and processed by the corresponding labor relations divisions or the National Labor Relations Commission created under this Code having cognizance of the same in accordance with the procedure laid down herein and its implementing rules and regulations. Cases on labor relations on appeal with the Secretary of Labor or the Office of the President of the Philippines as of the date of effectivity of this Code shall remain under their respective jurisdictions and shall be decided in accordance with the rules and regulations in force at the time of appeal. Pakiexplain namn po
hehe repealed na yan hindi na ini aappeal ang mga desisyon ng NLRC sa Office of the President. panoorin mo ito ruclips.net/video/H1Y1judnfCI/видео.html
Thank you Atty. and Dr. Duka for your short and sharp lecture covering comprehensive subject matters. God bless you as you've been a blessing to a score of law-lover individuals. ☺️
welcome.. Glad to hear that God bless too stay safe. pls share the channel to others
Thank you so much Atty. Duka for providing these comprehensive video lectures (cost-free). I have been watching your videos to supplement my study in Political and Labor Law. I have grown a better understanding and love for this subjects thanks to your lectures. God Bless po Atty.!
welcome. glad to hear that. pls dont skip the ads and pls help me invite more subscribers. thanks
Ang galing nyo po Magturo.. Super Linaw.... God Bless.
thanks a lot. God bless too pls share this channel to others thanks
Thank you Atty. this is really a great help more power God bless.
welcome. pls share to others thanks
So helpful! Thank you Dean Duka! ♥️⚖️
welcome
Salamat atty. More power po. 🙏🙏🙏
welcome thanks too
Kudos sir . U are great lecturer and worthy of your cause to teach law students and alike
salamat. just hoping to help others in my little ways.
Thank you Atty. Duka for all the guidance and wisdom shared on this platform.
welcome. please continue sharing to others in need thanks
Done with Consti and PIL. Now listening to Labor Lecture. Thank you Dean💕! Nalipong na kos kadaghan. So better simplified. I have decided to use your lectures and codals for prep materials.
welcome
@@CDDukaLaw buy his books, support us youtubers.
@@jurismadventureandlearningvlog thank you very much
Thank you po Atty. Duka for sharing your knowledge to us..Mabuhay ka!
welcome. glad to hear that. pls share this channel to others thanks
Thank you so much Dean. I've been using this lecture/watching over and over as additional material for labor relations since start of sem Thank you so much.
PS: At first I don't seem to love labor, but I found it interesting because of your lecture Dean and of course your jokes hahaha
welcome. glad to hear that. Pls subscribe and invite others to subscribe too. thanks good luck in law school
Thank you very much. Very well explained. Learned a lot. God bless you po atty.🙂
welcome. God bless too. pls share the channel to others
Thanks so much, sir Atty. Duka. God bless you richly.
So nice of you
Thank you Atty. Sana po may video din kayo about Consti 1.
we will work on that so stay tuned
Thank you Atty. Duka.
welcome po
Thank you for the free lecture.
You are welcome!
Thank you po Sir. Your lectures really helped me a lot since Lab 1. God bless po.
welcome. thank you too for being with me in my labor classes. Good luck in your journey to ATTY. stay safe
See you po sa lab rev! Hopefully. 😂
@@davielynetorres5213 i hope so too at sana face to face na hehe
Good Evening Atty. Cecilio Duka. I am Grace Velasco from PUP Paranaque Campus, BSOA student. I was looking for a speaker for our webinar this semester. I would like to invite you as our guest speaker. I hope through this message you will notice me and grant my request. Thank you!
Thank you so much po Dr. Duka
You are welcome
Salamat Atty malapit ko na mapnood lahat ng lectures mo. Thank u for sharing ur lectures. God bless you! 🌷 nakakabisado ko na rin lahat ng jokes mo 🤣
wow glad to hear that. welcome. pls share this channel to others thanks
Thank u Dean Atty. Duka
welcome. stay safe pls share this to others who may benefit from it thanks
thank you for the upload sir good bless
welcome. God bless too
Thank you so much po sir!
Sumasakit ulo ko kakabasa mababa kasi comprehension ko but with your video I am able to study Labor Relations habang nakangiti. Tawang tawa pa dn ako sa jokes mo kahit medyo gasgas na dun sa ibang lecture mo. Hahahaha
ok hehe
Good day sir...ano po pwede nmin gawin if may union samin at nag paratify sa rank n file employees at need nila makuha ang 50+1%. This is what happend they submitted the ratification for registration ans certification...the csc grant thier ratification and issued a certification to the management...question sir as an interested party we found out that thier list of signatories is fraud/falsified. .they did not reach 50+1% sa csc or sa labor po ba kami dapat mag file ng petition? Pwede po ba ma revoke ang certification nila...meron po kaming ebidensya ng list of signatories nila..
Thank you po...salamat sa lectures nyo👍
Thank you so much Atty ❤️
welcome
Hahahahhaa thank you sir! Makatawa ko saimong jokes jud🤣🤣🤣 makawala ug "duka"😂
hehe daghan salamat.
Salamat po attorney
welcome
From Naga here Atty. Maurag ang lectures mo po Sir 🔥
Dios mabalos. glad to hear that. pls subscribe and invite others to subscribe too. salamatonon saimo
as to the query on closed shop agreement - valid yan if the cba provides for it and the cba is ratified by the members of the bargaining unit
@@mikaymiranda2793- the labor code, and watch the video nandyan ang sagot. affirmed na rin ng supreme court decisions yan. stay safe too
Thank you so much atty! ❤❤❤
welcome pls share to others
Yes Atty. ❤
Hoping din po na sana magkaroon din po kyo ng lecture sa Tax and Commercial law po. 🙏🙏🙏
@@felmamallari3173 hehehe pag may time pa tayo
Thank you, Atty. for sharing your online lectures in YT. Your lectures in PIL helped me perform well in my PIL class this sem.
Sir, I have questions regarding labor. Are contractual employees working in LGUs or other government institutions entitled to security of tenure when the functions of said contractual employees are necessary and desirable in their designated offices?
I am a job order employee in LGU for almost 2 years, with every 3 months that my contract is renewed. I work as a writer and researcher and I perform tasks that are necessary and desirable in the functions of the office where I am assign to.
Also, what law covers job order employees working in the government sector in terms of their rights and welfare, is it the Labor Code, or CSC?
Thank you very much sir and more power to you po. :)
JO and COS in govt including LGU's are sui generis not covered by cs law or labor code. if they have a contract then its governed by civil code. the enforcement of which belongs to the regular court. that is a sad reality they do not have security of tenure
@@CDDukaLaw Thank you po for your immediate response sir. You have enlightened me regarding my current situation po. More power po Atty. God bless. :)
Thank you Sir for this video❤️
welcome
Thank youu atty! I just finished my labor law exam. This video really helped me.
Glad it helped!
Thank you Dean. Very helpful.
welcome, pls share this to others thanks
@@CDDukaLaw Yes Dean. Thanks. Dean, with all due respect po, meron lang akong kunting comment dun sa pagbanggit mo in the lecture that the soldiers, policemen, firemen and jailguards are not allowed to strike, which is correct naman. Ang concern is not on the proscription but on the term that is used to refer to us. We are jail officers po kasi, not jailguards. Mali po kasi yun. One may argue that it is what has been used for long. Maaring ganun but it doesnt mean na tama na ang isang bagay dahil matagal na ginagamit ito. Why is it wrong? It is wrong po for the followings: 1) I know that you know RA 6975, the same law that created the DILG and the agencies under it, including the PNP, BJMP and BFP.. Nowhere in that law that referred to us as jail guards, 2. The term is limiting.
eligible
@@VicenteMontalban77 that is duly noted but somehow matter of terminology..hehe. i did not use the term in a derogatory manner though.
@@CDDukaLaw Thank you Dean for duly noting it. The reason why I raised it precisely because it's a matter of terminology po. By philosophical definition, we all know that terminology is a discipline that systematically studies the "labelling or designating of concepts" particular to one or more subject fields, ideas, groups or domains of human activity. Corollary to that, the use of standard, common, particular or right terminology is essential to ensuring efficient, clear communications and proper dissemination of meaningful messages. Anyway, thank you po for not using it, in fairness, in a derogatory manner. We appreciate it. Stay safe and God bless.
Funny ❤😍 thank you
welcome
hi. suggestion - come out with a bar exam suggested answers. ty.
👏👏👏
Thank you po Dean
welcome
Thank you po Atty
welcome
Thank you very much, Dean Duka.🥰❤..God bless you always in good health!🙏❤🙏
welcome. pls help me invite more subscribers. thanks a lot
@@CDDukaLaw ❤
Thanks attorney 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Welcome. Best of luck
Thank you for this atty..helpful masyado sa exam namin. meron po bang part 2 nito?
welcome. the lecture is a complete discussion of labor relations law
Hi dean. Are there exceptions to the 10-day reglementary period to file an MR to the NLRC? Thank you dean
sorry wala sa rules. maybe due to force majeure of fortuitous event
@@CDDukaLaw thank you dean for the enlightenment
Nice Sir Duka Abugado kna pla ngaun studyante nyo po ako dati sa Foundation of Education sa NTC po.
glad to hear that. kaso di kita makilala dahil sa pangalan mo hehe.
Rondolf S. Mabazza Atty. Isa na rin po akong Union President dto sa school kya nung nakita ko youtube mo paulit ulit ko pinapanood Nadagdagan po yung Kaalaman ko na nman dahil po se Lecture nyo magalingtlga kyo Sir isa kyo Prof Ko hinahangaan ko at pati yung porma nyo po malupet 1995 kita naging prof sa foundation of Education 1 po
@@itawittribe yes naaalala kita. kumusta na? Glad to hear that keep safe and blessed salamat sa suporta sa channel pls share to others
Blessed afternoon ATTY. DUKAS, I just would like to be enlightened if it is lawful to make the last 15 days of salary be a part of the quit claim ? Thank You.
it made as a condition for clearance it is valid for as long as it will be given to you after you are cleared of all obligations
@@CDDukaLaw Thank you so much attorney . God bless you.
@@nildateves9633 welcome God bless too pls share this channel to others thanks
k10 joke hahaha winner. thank you for this atty :)
welcome
A and B filed a petition for certification election. Their petition was granted but they lost in the election as majority of the employees voted for “no union”. The next day, they failed to report for work. They claim that they were barred from entering the premises. They filed a suit for illegal dismissal and back wages. The company denied these allegations and alleged that A and B refused to return to work despite their attention being called. Were A and B legally dismissed?
What is the answer?
What is possible answer
Company Y is engaged in road construction projects of the government. It engaged the services of certain workers to work on various projects on different dates. Several of its workers joined Union A as members. Union A filed a motion for certification election with the regional office. Company Y opposed stating that the workers were project employees and not qualified to form part of the rank and file collective bargaining unit. Later, Company Y terminated the employment of the workers due to the completion of its projects or the expiration of worker’s contracts. The affected workers claimed they were dismissed because of their union activities; and thus staged a strike. The strike was declared illegal and the workers were deemed to have lost their employment status. Were the workers validly dismissed.
assignment ba yan?
Sir, if the employee suddenly died after serving 20 yrs in a company, what are his benefits under the labor code? thank you po, Atty. Duka.
wala sa labor code yan. sa sss law may death at burial benefits sya. check din kung may company policy or collective bargaining agreement tungkol sa death benefits
who is the officer conducting sena is it member of labor arbiter or any person designated by labor arbiter?
anyone officially designated as hearing officer
Sir, may a project employee entitled to separation pay of 1month salary for every year of service upon the completion of the project?
no because he is not a regular employee
good evening attorney! sir pwede ninyo po bang iexplain ang article 285 Regulations of Foreign Assisstance? Thank you so much po Sir!
nasa mga videos na yun kindly check all the videos on labor
govt officials magaling maghugas ng kamay hahaha true!
😂
gd day po, may tanong lang po ako, magkano po ba ang tamang sahod ng empleyado ng transportion gaya po ng BUS DRIVER at CONDOKTOR
dapat hindi bababa sa minimum daily wage sa region kung nasan ka
Atty.maganda araw po ask ko lang po
Nadisgrasya po ako sa work nabali kamay ko binuksan katawan ko anghaba po ng tahi at natanggalan po ako ng organ.
Humihingi po ako ng danyoa sa agency pwede kopo ba ibring up yong 1.2M sa kanila kasi dinapo ako makapag work sa kalagayan ko
idulog mo yan sa dole, sa sss at sa employees compensation commission para matulungan ka
atty can i request discussion on law on properties?
let us see
Thank you for this, Dean! Ipinasa ako ng magaling kong professor sa Labor Law Review dahil sa lecture na ito. Godbless po! ❤️
naku kilala ko yata yang professor mo😁ah. hehe
Hehe yes Dean! Sa last minute review ko po sa 1st week ng bar, ito lang papanoorin ko para sa Labor. Napaka-comprehensive di mo na kailangang pahirapan pa sarili mo sa last minute tips hehe.
Madam my tanung po ako regular po kame sa trabaho as a merchandiser agency po my hawak same tapos ung agency my client ngaun po ung client po namen umalis sa agency lumipat sa ibang agency ngaun po ung agency po na pinapasukan po namen pinagforce resign po kame lahat ng empleyado para po maabsorb sa nilipatan ni client ngaun po pagdating po namen sa bagong agency namen reapply po kame apply po ulit kame apply na parang bagong aplikante ulit atty ang tanung ko po my makukuha pa po ba kaming seperation pay sa dati namen na agency kase force resign po kame mawawala po kame sa pinapasukan namen kung ndi po kame magreresign at maflouting po kame sabi ni dating agency ko po atty may habol po ba kame sa dati naming agency? 100+ po kase kaming empleyado sa agency namen na nagsabay sabay na nagresign dahil sa ndi kame maabsorb sa new agency namen kung ndi po kame magresign
una hindi ako madam... lalaki ako at abogado hindi abogada ok? pangalawa kung nagresign kayo at voluntary eh wala kayong mahahabol sa agency nyo. kung sa tingin nyo napilitan lang kayo magresign at hindi kusang loob eh pwede ka at mga kasama mo magfile ng reklamo sa national labor relations commission ng kasong illegal dismissal
@@CDDukaLaw sorry po copy paste po kase ginawa ko pasencia na po sir.
@@CDDukaLaw salamat po sa sagot god bless po and more power po
@@ronieborico8254 welcome salamat din hope ma solve na problem na yan
Is there any current issues regarding violation of article 241 (250)?
masyadong maraming issues dyan lalo sa check off mas maganda basahin mo yung libro ko sa labor laws av ailable sa rex bookstore
@@CDDukaLaw I'd love to buy that book po and I'll be sure to get it. May I know any situation or is there news article about the check off issue please?
@@emi3821 may i ask why?
@@CDDukaLaw ever since I watched your video po. I've been curious of whether there are current issues under article 250. So, I have been searching in the internet po. There are few information information regarding it.
@@emi3821 yes that is true very few issues and mostly centered on Art. 250 paragraph o on check off for union dues
Ask q lng about AWOL
anong tanong sa absent without leave?
Art. 299. Disposition of pending cases. All cases pending before the Court of Industrial Relations and the National Labor Relations Commission established under Presidential Decree No. 21 on the date of effectivity of this Code shall be transferred to and processed by the corresponding labor relations divisions or the National Labor Relations Commission created under this Code having cognizance of the same in accordance with the procedure laid down herein and its implementing rules and regulations. Cases on labor relations on appeal with the Secretary of Labor or the Office of the President of the Philippines as of the date of effectivity of this Code shall remain under their respective jurisdictions and shall be decided in accordance with the rules and regulations in force at the time of appeal.
Pakiexplain namn po
hehe repealed na yan hindi na ini aappeal ang mga desisyon ng NLRC sa Office of the President. panoorin mo ito ruclips.net/video/H1Y1judnfCI/видео.html
@@CDDukaLaw pero ano pong explanation nyan. For educational purposes lang po. Thank you po Atty sa pag respond.
@@monchitobryann.balderianjr668 ang tawag dyan moot and academic sayang ang oras mo dyan kasi wala nang bisa yan
Thank you Atty.