What Did the Buddha Enlighten About?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 май 2024
  • What Did the Buddha Enlighten About?
    #buddha #enlightenment #buddhism
    Eastern mystics believe that this world is an illusion. This is true: they don’t just believe that the world is unreal, an illusion, maya-they know it is maya, it is an illusion, a dream. But when they use the word -world-they do not mean the objective world that science studies; no, not at all. They do not mean the world of trees, mountains, and rivers; no, not at all. They are referring to the world you create, weave within your mind, the wheel of the mind that keeps spinning and weaving continuously. Sansara has nothing to do with the external world.
    There are three things to remember. One is the external world, the objective world. The Buddha never spoke about it because it was not his concern; he was not an Albert Einstein. Then there is the second world: the world of the mind, the world that psychoanalysts, psychiatrists, and psychologists study. The Buddha would have a few things to say about it, not much, just a few things-in fact, just one: that it is an illusion, that it has no truth, whether objective or subjective, that it is in between.
    The first world is the objective world, which science studies. The second world is the world of the mind, which psychologists study. And the third world is your subjectivity, your inner realm, your inner self.
    The Buddha’s guidance is towards the innermost core of your being. But you are so entangled with the mind. Unless he helps you to become untrapped from the mind, you will never know the third world, the real world: your inner nature. Therefore, he starts with the statement: We are what we think. That is what everyone is: their mind. Everything ‘we are’ arises from our thoughts.
    Because of this, the Buddha used a peculiar word: no one had ever done such a thing before, or since. Mystics always used the word ‘self’ to denote the innermost core of your being-the Buddha used the word ‘non-self.’
    The Buddha did not use the word ‘self,’ atta. He used its opposite: ‘non-self,’ anatta. He said that when the mind stops, no self remains-you have become the universe, you have transcended the boundaries of the ego, you are pure space, uncontaminated by anything. You are just a mirror reflection of the Void.

Комментарии • 35

  • @shunlaiei5981
    @shunlaiei5981 Месяц назад +5

    Buddha analyze mind as mind, mental factors as mental factors, aggregates as aggregates.
    He woke up from unknowing.
    He knows Dhamma. All of the Truth.
    He has no defilements.
    He attained Nibbana.
    Analyzing self.
    It is finding out Nibbana, attained Nibbana, no death and no suffering, knowing everything.
    Every body can brighten and enlighten self. Just open the door.
    Nibbana is universal.
    We all must have wisdom that it is Nibbana if we don't attach mind, mental factors and aggregates.
    Nibbana is not abode and forever.
    Brahmins abodes, heavenly abodes, humen abodes and other abodes are not forever and have respective life spans according to the form, weather, mind and nutrients they consume.

    • @shunlaiei5981
      @shunlaiei5981 Месяц назад +1

      The past karma, the current wholesomeness support the life spans of being.
      There are the former Buddhas. The current Buddha. And there are the later Buddhahoods.

    • @StoryInspirations
      @StoryInspirations 10 дней назад

      🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @anuraupalihettiarachchi438
    @anuraupalihettiarachchi438 Месяц назад +2

    A very good introduction. It is a big thing that gradually also the Westeners have started understanding and admitting the woeld truth preached by the Lord Buddha.

  • @StoryInspirations
    @StoryInspirations 10 дней назад

    🙏🙏🙏🙏 buddhism ... a religion with no religion,

  • @katrinepearls
    @katrinepearls Месяц назад +1

    Consciousness comes first at the time of our birth, and only later on, as we grow, we divide the world into you and me, I.
    Human, higher class and animal, lower class, animate and inanimate.
    That's my spoil alert.
    Thank you for the hard work. It's an open opinion discussion, not debate.
    🌹💜🌻

  • @AshokKumar-ox8jk
    @AshokKumar-ox8jk Месяц назад +1

    Buddism is path of knowing nature it is a endless process learn true and reality of nature

  • @ejigubest-ek3zc
    @ejigubest-ek3zc Месяц назад +1

    Great man

  • @kallolpaul8764
    @kallolpaul8764 Месяц назад +2

    Watch nature animals birds...and know creation.

  • @sonamtsering6695
    @sonamtsering6695 Месяц назад +3

    Well explained

  • @SeiroosFardipour-wf4bi
    @SeiroosFardipour-wf4bi Месяц назад +4

    Is good clarification but too much images that are unnecessary, thankfully

    • @ramoesgaston
      @ramoesgaston Месяц назад

      You fell in love with the blond hair and blue eyed savior. If I reading your response correctly, RG for BUMMA higher performance.

    • @Jo-sl3db
      @Jo-sl3db 12 дней назад +1

      Just listen like I do.

  • @galaxymetta5974
    @galaxymetta5974 Месяц назад +1

    Suffering and the end of suffering.

  • @SeiroosFardipour-wf4bi
    @SeiroosFardipour-wf4bi Месяц назад +1

    What bring to reality the brain,codes written by genes thus logically speaking brain does not come first,but the product of a virtual codex carried by waves particles used as vehicles ,where simultaneously the matrix construct the tiny vehicules through which make and limits the bigger vehicles "brain"

  • @christinegrace6783
    @christinegrace6783 Месяц назад +1

    Be-cause REALITY IS NOT definable. Reality IS not the objective material world.

  • @mujaku
    @mujaku Месяц назад +2

    The Buddha never once denied the ātman. He only taught that attachment to our carnal body in the belief that it is our self is wrong. It only leads to suffering.
    The ātman is the Tathagatagarbha. All beings possess a Buddha Nature: this is what the atman is. This atman, from the start, is always covered by innumerable passions (klesha): this is why beings are unable to see it. - Mahaparinirvana-sutra

    • @smlanka4u
      @smlanka4u Месяц назад +2

      No need an Atman to recognize/memorize (Sangna) something. Recognition itself is the mind.

    • @BuddhismAndNirvana
      @BuddhismAndNirvana Месяц назад +2

      In Theravada Doctrine, I think Buddha rejected concepts about everlasting aspects of any sort.
      The big picture of ideologies and how they come to be, is well explained 'Brahmajala Sutta'. It was explained here as well.
      The grasping give rise to infinity of existence both observable and unobservable.
      Please don't except these ideas.
      Always be on the watch for the truth as Buddha once told, never reject nor admit, but seek!
      🙏🙏🙏

    • @friendsnote.1013
      @friendsnote.1013 28 дней назад

      Why do we need to be trapped by all these terms and definitions? If you study 25 years, they’re still terms and definitions… not getting us nearer to anything at all …
      The known will never discover anything beyond that.

  • @hwangfongmain7326
    @hwangfongmain7326 Месяц назад +2

    波粒二象性😅...&~~~

  • @harishgupta1303
    @harishgupta1303 Месяц назад

    Ples,,,stps,,my,,l,,,self,, se dalin secret confidential highly energy powerful prayers requireds till eternity ples secret confidential

  • @gregbrown5020
    @gregbrown5020 Месяц назад

    So indeterminate matter at quantum scale due to mutual arising is a reality. Since the external world of galaxies is also matter/energy this would also be indeterminate by logic. The external world of space/time is not maya. Matter is a reality even though undefined. The Buddha was wrong.