Ana Enraged(!) - Wife Pays For Hookers
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 июн 2010
- DISCOUNTS: www.theyoungturks.com/godaddy
FREE Movies(!): www.netflix.com/tyt
Note: The above two links are for TYT sponsors.
New TYT Facebook Page(!):
Read Ana's blog and subscribe at: www.examiner.com/x-5445-Politi...
Follow us on Twitter: / theyoungturks
TYT Network (new WTF?! channel): / whattheflickshow
Check Out TYT Interviews / tytinterviews
Watch more at www.theyoungturks.com
![BETA SQUAD vs AMP FOOTBALL MATCH [OFFICIAL STREAM]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ChEmvP52p0U/mqdefault.jpg)
![Oscar Maydon x Junior H - Volver Al Futuro [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/sa52xabMSB8/mqdefault.jpg)
Cenk is funny here trolling Ana
+AAD yeah sometimes trolling emotional people is really funny :D
+MusiCover Yeah it is. Guys Isnt he crazy?
+AAD the real trolling happened when he was promoting netflix, which he hates, but still isn't liberal enough to reject their bribe money.
+Sarah Connor he would do anything for money and fame.
Look at the underachieving, do-nothing rats criticizing the man who built his own anti-establishment media empire. Go be irrelevant losers elsewhere you spineless little vermin.
This is so frustrating! They're arguing about two separate things! Ana keeps on saying 'How is this OK??' ... It's not OK - but it's immoral not illegal... The courts can't regulate morality!
+H A Phillips
Well, immoral depending on definition, not by fact
+Goofy8907 it is fact that it is immoral to cheat on a spouse.
+Zoltan slayer of trolls and lost sheeple not a fact at all, depends on the agreement the couple have.
West African Gooner fair enough, my bad.
+Adalberto Cardoso not really. one could argue that it's not cheating if there is an agreement
The funny thing is, when a male celebrity recently objected to his ex-wife using her $9,000 per month in child support on herself, rather than on the kids, the judge told him that she was free to do so.
jack johnson your so right ,,,, just free to do so ,,,
jack johnson I agree with ched on this video, but if i'm going to do that i'm following a logic that doing socially unacceptable things does not equal illigal. In this anecdote you bring forth i'd have to maintain this stance that doing socially unacceptable things does not equal illigal.
jack johnson hilarious! the money was obtained from the celebrity on the premise of "the good of the child" and then proven to have been mishandled. seems like fraud.
***** If that's what you take from it, then i've misrepresented my view. Sorry and nevermind.
then that judge should lose his or her job
Where's Ana's argument even? Yeah it was a shitty thing to do, but it was not illegal, so why is the judge's ruling wrong? The gambling analogy is 100% spot on. And as a side note, the wife isn't "paying" for shit. You can't pay for anything if you don't have money. The husband made the money...
I think it's more of an emotional argument rather than a coherent one. It feels like it's wrong but in reality it's just a personal issue between the husband and wife that needs to be settled between them.
Even though the husband made the money, it's still the wife's also. Once you're married everything is 50/50, unless you sign a prenuptial agreement.
It's not illegal though. If he spent it on an expensive car for him he's still allowed to do that even though it could be severely looked down upon by the wife. It's a matter between the couple. The wife has every right to be unhappy but it's not a court issue.
Exactly. It isn't a court issue. What he did was a really shitty thing to do, and like Ana said that settlement was to support him and his family. But support usually doesn't consist of spending thousands on prostitutes. I do know that I would be extremely pissed if I was the wife, but I wouldn't take it to court.
Ashley Beckner
Actually, that's not necessarily true, in the case of legal judgments. Depends on the jurisdiction, the source, the extent to which the money is or isn't commingled with other monies, etc.
Just because its a joint account doesn't mean it's HER money. He got the settlement, he can spend it on whatever he wants. He was stupid to put it into a joint account anyway.
***** Totally different situation. If he's blowing the business' money on hookers, that is embezzlement. Technically , it's neither of "their" money if it's a business account depending on the business.
Even though its a joint account, you know who the clear money maker is which is one of the reasons her case was dismissed. Also, the drawback of joint personal accounts is that either person can spend the money on whatever they want without consent.
That's literally what a joint account means
I love going back and rewatching the old stuff. I remember this set, and I remember this is how it looked when I was in College lol. I've literally been watching TYT since I discovered them my senior year of HS in 2008.
His settlement, his choice what to do with the money.
I don't see the issue.
It wouldn't be an issue if he wasn't married.
This is more about Ana being a nice person. I respect her feelings on this. She will make some one a very good friend and wife. some day.
Well at least he didn't waste the money.
Miele Rodriguez lol... and never have a joint bank acount
Joe Mendez No, have 3 bank accounts. His Hers and Theirs...
I could be wrong here but wasn't it his money that he was using? He won the 1.4mil in the settlement which I'm guessing that he deposited into their joint account, so what ever money he was using would have been his anyway.
It doesn't matter who's money it was to begin with. The moment it goes in a joint account, it belongs to both parties equally. The husband did nothing wrong legally, he spent money that belonged to him. That's why the judge (rightly) didn't do anything.
no such thing as "his" money when you're a married man. Its all hers.
So women spend their husbands money on shoes and nail bars = OK? Men spend it on massages and hookers = Not OK? Since when it extra marritial affairs unlawful?
***** If should be encourage, less domestic fights, less jail, save tax payers money, ya man
Sam G logic checks out.
***** excellent point. Women can always spend thw huabands earnings on bullshit and noone bitches about it.. now the roles are reversed and the judge rightly saw through the dubble standard.. and all hell brakes loose
One question- would you approve your girlfriend spending money on a male hooker?
Hhj88 K Women almost never use their own money..
If he broke his back or whatever, it's his money. Why would that be their money all of the sudden because of it.... It's morally wrong and disgusting, but that doesn't mean he has to pay his wife back for it...
I 100000000% agree with the judge.
I agree with the Judge 100% its his money.
She should divorce him. end of story.
I work in a bank, and as long as the account is joint then one of the account holders has the ability to withdraw every last penny and throw it in the ocean if they want without facing any legal action. Thats why we have both account holders sign the documents that ppl never bother read that actually say that they are responsible with what happens to the money. If he stole money by fraud or any means from her non-joint private account, then that is the only way she could take him to court.
If I was him, I'd be worried about getting a divorce. She could get half of his money.
Even more because it's Australia.
NavyCombatCorpsman Why is that?
horrorjunkie92
They have different laws from the US community property statutes. In some cases the settlements are a lot larger. It all depends on the case the lawyer makes in court.
Marriage is the most expensive prostitution you'll ever buy.
I think the obvious solution is to have the wife travel to Southern Africa and hire some local black studs to run a train on her. Take many photos then show them to the husband. And use the money from the joint account.
Simple, Easy, Elegant. Case dismissed.
Lol very funny.
Eethan O'Connell until she tests positive for ebola.
Eethan O'Connell for supreme court justice!
Heed My Warning Southern Africa is thousands of miles away from the Ebola areas - no cases there for decades. She would have more chance of catching it in the US.
Now HIV is a different issue...
divinity176
ah, i stand corrected.
If she was doing her job as a wife, he wouldn't have to go to hookers.
this will be an interesting tyt classics in time
I like Ana's nose the way it was here.
Anna looked much more natural in this time.
There's a difference between "is it 'ok'" and "is it legal"...the courts exist to enforce the law, not morality.
Ana you can't win with me LOL because........1. takes logic.2. takes logic.3. takes logic.
Isn't every bank account considered a joint account when you're married?
Yes!
unless you hide it
NO. No, actually it isn't. You still have to divide 'personal' accounts if you get a divorce, but only 'joint' accounts are 'joint' when you're married. For example: I'm married and I have several joint accounts with my wife. My wife has several personal accounts that contain money left to her by her family. Unless she makes _those account_ joint accounts, or transfers money from them into our joint account, I have no access to that money.
HOWEVER! Since she acquired the money while we were married, if we got a divorce I could argue that those accounts should be split between us. (I might not win, since it might not be considered 'marital income', but I could make the claim, and a judge could side with me.)
Lugh314 Nice, thanks for the factual correction. Do you charge your hookers to the joint accounts?
ScrewTheLiving I use cash, like any sensible John.
The guy shouldn't have to pay that money back, because he is a joint owner and the sole reason for that settlement, he is spending money which is his. adultery is not a crime in australia therefore the judge was correct. While the money was given to him because of his injuries, there was no strings attached. Its not a voucher that can only be used on fresh food etc, he is free to spend the money on whatever makes him happy as it was not his fault for being severely injured. The man did nothing illegal, i actually feel sorry for him. He went from working everyday and being social to staying home and watching tv, put on weight, wife thinks he's lazy and stops sleeping with him. He goes to brothels to feel alive again (brothels are legal in australia).
D'angelo "ass in veins" Bustell I agree 💯percent
Actually part of that money he won is for pain and suffering.
Why aren't these videos available for people in the members Archive section at tytnetwork.com? Bummed out by that.
That was so weird, they were all on the same side but somehow disagreed... They all agreed it was wrong but not court worthy
+Graham Sheedy Ana was offended (rightly so) and Cenk was just being a goof/idiot. So.
+Namaka Lis Why was she right to be offended? She wasn't the wife that got cheated on.
Krytern UK Women empathize with each other. If someone raped 10 people but I wasn't one of them, do you think I'm not going to be offended by his predatory and disgusting behavior? Do I have to be a victim to have a response? Do you not know what empathy or logic are?
crimson ph34r As a Buddhist Atheist and future therapist who believes empathy is one of the most important traits for any individual to develop, I pity you. I'm not the person to talk to about your personal problems with false rape allegations. It's odd how you crap on emotion and sensitivity, though your last comment was just one big emotion dump itself. Just a different kind of emotion, a volatile kind.
It's obvious that some rape accusations are untrue and of course that's very upsetting. In my hypothetical scenario I said "If someone raped 10 people" not "if someone were accused of raping 10 people", obviously an accusation cannot be treated as fact, but if someone tells me they've been raped I will listen to them and empathize, while similtaneously remaining aware that people are innocent until proven guilty.
The problem here is blurred lines.
you have 3 issues here
1) who's money is it
2) how the money was handled ie joint account
3) infidelity
1) the money was basically his from a settlement. however by default the wife has some stake in the money as well.
2) joint account makes it a defacto 50/50 split, which means he could have spent his money on the hookers not her's
3) As far as the infidelity is concerned well that hurt the wife and coming out of their joint account made it an insult to injury from an emotional standpoint.
I'm sure divorce is on the way and they can breakup the assets then.
remember men always have a separate account for yourself, women do. even more importantly never get married.
Ana is taking on the insult to injury clause here and making it personal.
Infidelity doesn't matter.
Joint accounts are accessible to both parties, so that doesn't matter either. And joint accounts are not a 50/50 split, most people don't understand this. If you have a joint account with someone they can withdraw 100% of the money and there's nothing you can do about it.
Also, the settlement is the family's money, i.e., both the husband and the wife's money since they're married. But the fact that the wife has a stake in that money doesn't really mean anything. If this guy gambled it all away or boozed it all away, tough titty. It's unfortunate, but true. Courts aren't there to settle how couples or partners mismanage their family's money. The only time the court steps in is when there's a divorce and the assets need to be divided.
man i miss these old clips
LMFAO JUST WENT BACK TO THIS..GOLD
I love Ana. Give em' HELL girl.
Anna, you are 100% right. When i watch the young Turks, if its only cenk on the show, i don't watch it, i don't like the way he thinks.
+Daniel Forget You're an illogical and emotional fool if you think she is correct here. I don't like Cenk either but he is correct here.
CrimsonWolf69 💢👏👏👏👏 thank you
+dyga fabe
Hehe, I know right.
Ana isn't mature enough to separate the moral from the legal. Then when they disagree with her because she is wrong, she plays the female-victim card. 4:04
CrimsonWolf69 facts💢🙌😩💢👏👏👏👌📢
lol
If the million dollars was in the joint account, obviously it should be ruled in favor of him. If I win the lotto and buy a car, i'm not "stealing" from my wife. Now if they were in the process of getting a divorce and he did this, that would be a completely different story and absolutely should make a different in how their assets are split up.
Omg first old vid I've watched of these guys. Anna rocks
okay Ana even if he had to pay it back, with what money? If the woman divorce him, he will be paying it back and then some. It sounds like she want control of the money, because he spend it on stupid stuff. If that is the case she should take most out of the joint account and open another one that she controls.
Ana gets a little too emotional in these debates. Cenk was just kidding around the whole time.
+Zues Kiniro he wasn't kidding , and Its ok to spend money on hookers, don't discriminate bro
well said
if she wants the money she needs to divorce him plain and simple.
In the end they all agreed. No court involvement and it was stupid.
The comment about paying back money to a JOINT account was an off hand reaction and not a thought out solution
and no one should be judged harshly for a quick gut reaction.
If the stupid thing is something the wife wants to stop badly enough get a divorce and a settlement that does not involve a JOINT account.
a spouse can't touch injury settlement money
*****
unless it's deposited into a JOINT account. ;-0)
***** yeah if i knew i was coming into some money i'd get a divorce beforehand regardless
Life aint about money
***** Oh but it is
1. the title is misleading: the wife did not pay for hookers.
2. the purpose of the money is just people's opinions.
3. any woman can out sex a man. if he had the energy for hookers then she wasn't doing her job on the regular.
Heed My Warning What job?
Are you saying it was her "job" to have sex with him ?
Hhj88 K Pretty sure se is.
Hhj88 K Considering that a woman successfully sued her husband for not having sex with her, I'd say yes it is
tamer egy its not her job to have sex with him tho!
I like they way he did the ad at the end,
Haha the Ad at the end was probably better than the story!
I thought this said Ana Engaged. *-*
Lol its funny to see her all hot and bothered.
tyt, you do advertisements RIGHT. i crack up at all the ways you guys put in the word for netflix.
and it actually works.... i've been suggesting netflix to friends. lol
these old vids...great
dat outro tho xD
Dope freshness!
+GMUStudentDesign Only the dopest of fresh. Slash Tee Why Tee. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
SAAAN!
I see Ana's point, and I don't disagree that it's wrong what the guy did, and it's for many a reason for divorce, and I have no argument with that, but I don't agree with the paying back bit, divorce him, and receive 1/2 of what's left, although because it's an injury payout I'm not sure that's necessarily fair because it wasn't paid to her for her injury but to him for his, and to help deal with the costs of debilitating injury. Maybe he looks like a train wreck now and the wife won't touch him? In that case the money is being spent on something he can't get from his wife any more so his compensation is covering that. I'm only putting this forward to broaden the argument and suggest some of the things that might be going on here that could have an impact on what's fair. I'd like to add also that I earn a lot more than my wife and we have a joint account and she spends MUCH more of the joint money on herself or her desires than I do on mine. Does that mean I should be able to demand that money back?? (not talking about sex here).
Excellently put.
I can't see how she thought the guys missed her point.
The only time a judge should get involved in a case like this one is if it is in divorce court. Then it is applicable to the justice system, and it is applicable only then.
so it is ok for the wife to get her hair and nails done every week, back rubs and shopping trips. that ok right! and do not act like that wouldn't add up when you have so much money. the problem with him cheating is a issue for them not the courts. if she dont like it then divorce and take your half and go>
If there still is a half from him blowing money on hookers
i agree with u the hookers only doing her job the problem is between husband and wife. i would like to see they make hooking into a real job that can be taxed like Amsterdam does it.
Heed My Warning >for real and it be a lot safer for everyone... even the kids walking the street.
I personally believe the REAL issues here are:
1.) This is money awarded to the husband alone because of a tragic accident he suffered, not something he & the wife got into together - at least as far as anybody's said here. That means it's his income, to do with as he pleases.
2.) Married or not, the very fact that the ONLY account they have is a JOINT one is an issue in itself because if neither spouse has their own account then how are they going to keep something back for their own wants & needs? Or, for that matter, keep a birthday or Christmas gift a surprise, if the money they take out to buy it came out of the joint account? The only reason to have a joint account is to put the money spent on bills into, & because it looks better to banks & insurance companies who might give you better rates of interest & lower payment requirements than single people.
3.) Trips to the Philippines are not that simple. For one thing, you have to get a passport & no matter how much money you can throw at it you're not going to get one all that quickly. For another, the laws in the Philippines are drastically different, & even just visiting you'd have to show at least a basic understanding of them before they'd let you in further than the airport or the U.S. Consulate. This was not an impulse decision for this guy. This is something he's been wanting to do for a long time. The settlement just gave him the funds to do so. Why doesn't the wife talk to her husband about why he felt he could only get the sex he was looking for from Filipinas, instead of bitching about the money he spent doing so?
4.) There wasn't anything said in this video about whether the couple was married at the time or not, just that the woman had been his wife for 24 years prior to this incident. Well, if they're divorced - or even just separated - she doesn't really have a say in how he uses his money, regardless of whose account it's in. If they're still married, joint property doesn't apply during a marriage. It's only when you're trying to get divorced that ownership of any asset - whether physical or fiduciary - is actually assessed. Therefore, the wife cannot ask for the money back because it's not hers to ask for.
5.) If the guy got all this money for a major accident that now prevents him from ever working again, how - exactly - would he have repaid the money even if the judge had said he was supposed to?
That's all I have to say about that - at least for now. I've had to switch from Microsoft Edge to Google Chrome to write this, because for some reason when I'm in Edge the cursor keeps disappearing from in this little box & I couldn't really get anything written. Does anybody else have this problem? Please let Me know. Thanks.
Hahahaha. The last part was unnecessary. Anyways not alot of people who I encountered uses edge. Me, I don't care, been using iE all the time. But placing this question in RUclips, is guaranteed not to get you solid answers. Hope you fixed your problem.
Timothy Hansen What a great response, also switch to a better browser if you have not yet.
Where did you get this idea from?
Back here after 13 years. I still find this amusing. I am on Cenk’s side but my wife is taking Ana’s side. 😂
Because ANNA ur wrong always and thats why ur crazy... If he bought the ferrari would the wife sue him..... If the wife buys a gucci Bag can the man sue him? like wtf... Going for hookers is morally wrong but u cant sue him for that? how many partners have cheated; does every partner in usa cheated on has the right to sue? u dont make sense with ur feminist bias, its ok when a women does it but when a man does it u go against him... grow up... this is equality.
+Takashi As Im sure part of this reason she sued is out of anger at what he spent the money on and the betrayal, however she actually had a legal right to sue him in regards to joint banking legalities - 90% of the time when opening a joint account the bank will ask of you want the legality of both parties needing to sign for funds to be withdrawn or transferred out of said account so neither party can withdraw funds without the other persons knowledge, which is actually a strict legality here in Australia , where this case actually happened, and it turned out they did not have a co signer authorisation so either party was able to withdraw funds from the account, which signalled a change to legislation of joint accounts. But this woman has actually taken this case higher and still years later fighting for rights to the recoup the funds under the marital act.
+Takashi She was arguing the moral issue.
+Takashi She was obviously arguing the issue of if that guy was right to do what he did, not so much the legal issue.
Well there she goes pulling the gender card...big surprise there
to each his own.. don't tell anyone how to spend their money. it's not yours
Is that your Hannity-face in the Netflix ad at the end?
Best Netflix Add Ever.
I love tyt and cenk, but him in that ad in the end was just hilarious.
It sounds to me like there's some information missing from this story. -- like : is his settlement money in the joint account, or is he spending money in the joint account while keeping the settlement money for himself?
The settlement money was put into a joint account, meaning that is it has to be shared. Had he made a separate account, this wouldn't be and issue because it would clearly be his money and not hers.
Lol, Cenk in the end reminds me of Bruce Campbell XD
good video
It's his money, it's wrong but is his money and he can do it with HIS money
It's amazing to watch this TYT video that's actually entertaining and the guys being fun to listen to, in contrast to the nasty, miserable people they'd become who smear their political opponents, race-bait and cherry-pick cop-hating stories.
24 years is a long time to be married....
HE won the settlement money for HIS injuries in the first place. Then the money was placed in a JOINT account which means they both had access to it. In what way is the wife legally owed any money back? I am not arguing that the husband is adulterous but this is what is known as a frivolous law suit. It has no legal basis.
it's his money! who is he supposed to pay it back to?
What the hell was cent doing when he was advertising netflix at the end? lol
I thought the title says Ana Engaged! I was like NOOOOOOO!!!
I think that was the deal 3 years ago too.
The massive error the dude committed was depositing the settlement money in their joint account. His money, and her money should remain separated.
Don't you get a free month with netflix when you first try it out anyway? Or is this an additional free month?
When was this .. the 70ies?
XDDDD Ana b4 she loosened up with Cenks dynamic is outrageously hilarious.
Haha miss these ads
The ad at the end is just creepy. :(
BTW, payments awarded for injuries and pain and suffering are considered a separate estate and not part of the marital estate split in a divorce.
"Tag a log" this and "Tagalog" that. Ahahahaahaha.
This. made. my. day.
The lesson is that you should never have a joint account with your husband or your wife, unless you're OK with them using it to do whatever they feel like. Keep your own money in your own account.
Is TYT still an active newscast?
You know shit is going down when there is an exclamation mark!
i guess anything spent from a joint account should be agreed upon first
what country are you from
Taga-log this and taga-log that... haha... cenk cracks me up
put the CC on
Oh, how much I miss the goofy ads Cenk and Ana used to do for sponsors! You guys should make a video montage of all these fun ads for TYT Underground.
I know this is an old story, but I just want to say, Cenk's Netflix plug at the end is hilarious! He lays on the smarm so thick you can taste it! It's so obviously deliberate, too. The chair swivel, the cheesy grin and the little nod at the end! I LOL'd so hard.
He stole her money and she SHOULD go to court.
Thats the only way to get money back.
Because for shure he has no receipts.
Sex (of my husband) ruined big part of my life.
@mnkittel
That's what seems to happen when you argue on emotion rather than logic.
What IS WRONG with this girl? Ok so the guy broke his spine in a terrible car accident, but now, given that he "is married" (wow) he is not even allowed to get some massage and hookers?? That's the money they got from the insurance for HIS broken spine/ribs/bones.
I'm sure if the woman had spent 1/10th on expensive clothes Ana would have said it is OK! for the husband to break his back and ribs so his wife can have some nice things!!!
i almost didn't recognize the word "tagalog" with how he said it x]
cent goes billistic is my fav fid
It's his settlement, HIS.
That outro. Someone needs to show that to present day Cenk. XD
he is using his money? omg how unfair
Ana looks so pissed at the end!
lol that ending tho XD Cenk trying to be smooth =P