Happy Friday everyone! Hope you all had a great week! Just like the Tundra, Toyota basically offers two top trims in the Sequoia, for about $80k, would you guys go with the more luxury oriented Capstone trim or the tough off-road ready TRD Pro?
Neither Tahoe Wagoneer expedition all day long. They may cost the same if not more but that’s entirely justified because they’re better cars unlike this
To answer your question, I think the Capstone would be better. Sure it’s not a better ride per se, due to the sold rear axle, but it would seem that most Sequoia buyers like the luxurious of the Capstone more than the TRD Pro. If I was buying a Sequoia, probably a Platinum.
Sofyan, I thought your review was very comprehensive. As Toyota's chief truck engineer stated at the time of launch, design and budget compromises had to be made to get head office approval for a new version of this low volume model. Most complaints about the Sequoia's drivetrain can be easily overcome by simply having Toyota import base models of the Land Cruiser 300 Series. That model offers permanent four wheel drive with locking differentials galore for serious off road duty. I am in favour of more consumer choices. As long as a vehicle meets our regulatory standards, we ought to be able to buy it. The new Tacoma will also offer a full-time 4WD option so there is no reason Sequoia and Tundra could not incorporate the same feature. 😉
Bahahaha! I saw these in person at the Toyota dealership. They have one thing going for them in my opinion and that’s the exterior looks. This car is absolutely huge on the outside with some of the worst use of space on the inside I’ve ever seen from a full size SUV.
Totally agree on the lack of full time 4WD. I drive a Platinum version and really like it overall, but would like a full time 4WD as well as either the MTS or even the old ATRAC system. The rear shelf system works fairly well, but needs to be able to hold up itself when the extension flaps are deployed; support for the shelf is too dependent on the position of the 3rd row seats. Best highway mileage I've hit is 22mpg, but you really need other vehicles to draft off to achieve that; there is a huge MPG difference if your trip is uphill vs downhill.
I just wish the trunk was an even just a couple more cubic feet of space would defiantly make it more useful when the 3rd row is being used/up. Other than that I think this vehicle is perfect for the most part. In fact I saw a Capstone trim the other day and I gotta say it looked sharp, I'd get it over the Tahoe for sure.
Saw a TRD PRO the other day with a 2/3 panoramic roof, covering first 2 rows. Small mirrors too, not the towing ones. Not sure if it had the roof rack. Possibly an options package we weren’t aware of?
There's two things that kept me from buying this truck....I dont want the hybrid but could have lived with it....but the 3rd row was a killer for me. I wish there was a way to delete it. The fact this thing doesnt have a flat cargo floor KILLS it for many.
After forcing us to wait well over a decade for a full redesign, Toyota failed in the overall packaging of this new Sequoia. They've had plenty of time to study the competition and yet still fell short in delivering a spacious full size suv.
Yet these will still be extremely difficult to get, and nearly impossible to get at MSRP. So I’m not sure if your market research is better than Toyotas
@@COPEV2These aren't hard to find because of large demand. They're hard to find cuz Toyota is barely making any of them and their allocation system sucks.
While Kia hyundai chevy ford nissan hondas sit on the lot, Toyota is sold out with lines down the street , at least in Socal. Competitive makes just hate that.Any negative Toyota comments are obviously from other manufacturers or their employees. Please.disregard. I dont work for or own aToyota product
19mpg city? The v8 was what 15mpg city? Watch as the v8 option becomes a luxury item like a rolex. Only for the 5%. Or for those who will finance it at 25%apr interest 😂
I think Toyota REALLY messed up the Sequoia BIG time! I don’t want to choose either give up cargo room for more passenger room or give up passenger room for more cargo?! It’s really dumb.
I mean.. you can fold one side of the third row and still fit one or two people and load some things at the same time. There's nothing wrong with that.
The flat cargo space is actually achievable if they move the battery to the spare tire space and move the spare tire to the hinge door. Caveat is that if you take the car extreme off-roading an impact the bottom of the battery this can set the battery on fire. But its the same with all the other electric suvs and trucks.
I love this SUV and was thinking of buying one, but the moment I saw the cargo space and the 3rd-row seat - couldn't do it. I needed more room for my family, so I bought the new redesigned Honda Pilot Elite instead - very happy with the purchase. It was a very difficult decision because I love the Toyota brand and always wanted one. I wanted the Limited with the TRD package.
10:04 naah be quiet on that part, rear independent suspension is a bad design it has more parts to break and its weak, they should just offer a non hibrid version and leave the solid axel alone, its better to sacrifice comfort than reliability, solid axel is better for towing, off-road and less maintenance issues practically maintenance free, just don't talk about the rear axel don't spoil reliable set up...
Looks are amazing but the 2nd row doesn’t slide (odd) & the rear cargo is completely pointless especially considering the competitors, not sure why they made it so horrible
most off roaders car campers overlanders never even use it ,I get car sick just thinking of back there ....back mtn roads . free way clover leafs no o s handle , you are trapped, no window to roll down , no door to open , how to you escape ? death seats the 3rd row
I sold my tundra to upgrade to this sequoia ..but now gas approaching 7 bucks per gal I have to scratch this plan..19 and 21 for a hybrid is not impressive..Toyota needs to do better
Sophie Jeep Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer have two different 3.0 V6 engines and the high output is 510 that's more than anything that Toyota spitting out there
rear axle is a plus because its the only full size SUV with it, eazy to lift most ground clearance,doesn't have. wierd tire wear when towing,way better platform to make a preeruner or trail rig. It probably doesn't have 4wd auto because they are clutch based and overheat offroad when pushed hard although some transfer cases can do it without overheating.
In reality, you shouldn’t compare it to the Hyatt Antal Amer a RAV4 you should compare it to the Chevy Tahoe or GMC as a fuel consumption just to know is it better or not?
I own a 2nd gen Sequoia and had a first gen. The tech and the looks are better on the 3rd gen, everything else is a major letdown. Less cargo capacity, less passenger space, no roll down rear window, worse packaging, and fake leather seats in an $80k+ SUV. Toyota seems to have prioritized looks and features over practicality. Oh yeah and no tow hooks.
Toyota half a$$ed the design. Having a 3rd row that has less volume than the smaller grand highlander is a joke! How can you mess up the cargo area this bad, considering the sequoia is based off the Tundra? Toyota blew it! Just like the new Prius rear door handles, since they advertised it as a cab. Can you imagine driving it as a cab in NYC and having to explain to every single passenger, how to open the doors? 😂
I think the Sequoia has less 3rd row than the grand highlander is because it's body on frame as well as a solid rear axle AND battery pack taking up space back there; grand highlander is unibody that can accommodate these things better
Toyota had 15 years with the generation before this all new model. 2008! And this is what they came up with!? Lithium ion battery could have saved space, but they decide to give it old battery technology. It’s a shame. It’s not that big of a battery either, 1.5kw. Here’s another design flaw. RUclips, how to jump start 2023 Toyota Sequoia. 😂 for more laughs. 😂 the freaking truck battery is in the very back, behind a plastic panel! Yet you jump it from the fuse box, under the hood! 😂 it’s a mess!
@@chibbyylol I think mister301 knows it as well. It's just not a good design decision by Toyota. Knowing that a body on frame design would raise the floor and eats up headroom, why would Toyota put a battery under it and make the floor even higher? The owner not only has to choose between more third row legroom or more cargo room, but third row headroom will always be limited and the seat will always feel like it's on the floor. People want big 3 row suv for mainly 2 reasons, big tough look and tons of cargo plus big 3rd row seat. Sequoia aces the look, but having bottom of the class interior space kills the interests for many potential buyers.
This is a packaging fail on Toyotas part. Not sophisticated, which Toyotas never are, but there was more than enough time to get the suspension and battery packaging correct. GM is still tops in the segment and I don't see them at changing
This car is very cool but the cargo area is a complete deal breaker. Can’t put dog crates in back, can’t comfortably car camp in back, can’t flat load furniture in back. That was a huge mistake on Toyota’s part.
No its not over priced. Way better milage and tow capacity. The new TRD is my favorite purchase of all times. I have 420 ponies and I get 22 mpg on the hwy.
@@rhicksmtb that’s pretty good mpg. They are cool SUVs but just pricey for a Toyota in my opinion. They are really cool SUVs though and they probably are worth the money in the long run I suppose
TRD Pro without optional 2nd row bench seats is dealbreaker for me. Captain’s chairs are comfortable no doubt but extremely not practical. I guess I’m skipping at least this year’s model.
this is a 100k truck even used , Toyota is on some serious drugs I test drove it just last month its gorgeous don't get me wrong but wouldn't pay more then 70k for it
Happy Friday everyone! Hope you all had a great week! Just like the Tundra, Toyota basically offers two top trims in the Sequoia, for about $80k, would you guys go with the more luxury oriented Capstone trim or the tough off-road ready TRD Pro?
Neither
Tahoe Wagoneer expedition all day long. They may cost the same if not more but that’s entirely justified because they’re better cars unlike this
To answer your question, I think the Capstone would be better. Sure it’s not a better ride per se, due to the sold rear axle, but it would seem that most Sequoia buyers like the luxurious of the Capstone more than the TRD Pro. If I was buying a Sequoia, probably a Platinum.
I'm curious what your acceleration numbers would look like in Tow plus. In my Tundra it really speeds it up.
Sofyan, I thought your review was very comprehensive. As Toyota's chief truck engineer stated at the time of launch, design and budget compromises had to be made to get head office approval for a new version of this low volume model. Most complaints about the Sequoia's drivetrain can be easily overcome by simply having Toyota import base models of the Land Cruiser 300 Series. That model offers permanent four wheel drive with locking differentials galore for serious off road duty. I am in favour of more consumer choices. As long as a vehicle meets our regulatory standards, we ought to be able to buy it. The new Tacoma will also offer a full-time 4WD option so there is no reason Sequoia and Tundra could not incorporate the same feature. 😉
TRD Pro. It looks much better.
Don’t worry guys Toyota will address all the short coming in the redesign, coming sometime early 2040
2099
😂😂 Good one
Bahahaha! I saw these in person at the Toyota dealership. They have one thing going for them in my opinion and that’s the exterior looks. This car is absolutely huge on the outside with some of the worst use of space on the inside I’ve ever seen from a full size SUV.
Is because the battery @@Ryan2022
That red camo interior is🔥
Got damn, we’re really around the $100k corner for Toyotas now
Totally agree on the lack of full time 4WD. I drive a Platinum version and really like it overall, but would like a full time 4WD as well as either the MTS or even the old ATRAC system. The rear shelf system works fairly well, but needs to be able to hold up itself when the extension flaps are deployed; support for the shelf is too dependent on the position of the 3rd row seats. Best highway mileage I've hit is 22mpg, but you really need other vehicles to draft off to achieve that; there is a huge MPG difference if your trip is uphill vs downhill.
I just wish the trunk was an even just a couple more cubic feet of space would defiantly make it more useful when the 3rd row is being used/up. Other than that I think this vehicle is perfect for the most part. In fact I saw a Capstone trim the other day and I gotta say it looked sharp, I'd get it over the Tahoe for sure.
I like this guys reviewing, he is real as fuck. I’ll forever watch him review the cars when I’m debating on buying
Saw a TRD PRO the other day with a 2/3 panoramic roof, covering first 2 rows. Small mirrors too, not the towing ones. Not sure if it had the roof rack. Possibly an options package we weren’t aware of?
The pano roof is avilable on the TRD Pro
They need to off a non hyrbid option, how come the tundra got a non hybrid turbo v6 option 🤦🏽♂️
Why ditch the v8 when it gets the same mpg
I agree that the misses and downgrades are the loss of AWD and poor 3rd row and rear space
Your reviews are great except you never fold down all the seats to see all the cargo space available...
Nice vehicle, but I think Platinum or Capstone trim will be better sellers considering the Sequoia market writ large.
It's a TRD Pro. we need to see it offroad :)
"...but for those of you who actually need to carry a lot of CRAP in this vehicle..." This is the level of technical jargon I'm here for. :D
That thing is lower than the Big Guys belly, it might not get caught by the IRS, but the first railroad track crossing could be its last.
They didn’t want to sell the Land Cruiser any more because it was $86k and didn’t sell volume. So they make an $86k Sequoia with lower build quality.
There's two things that kept me from buying this truck....I dont want the hybrid but could have lived with it....but the 3rd row was a killer for me. I wish there was a way to delete it. The fact this thing doesnt have a flat cargo floor KILLS it for many.
After forcing us to wait well over a decade for a full redesign, Toyota failed in the overall packaging of this new Sequoia. They've had plenty of time to study the competition and yet still fell short in delivering a spacious full size suv.
That’s typical Toyota and Lexus. They overhype and severely underperform
Yet these will still be extremely difficult to get, and nearly impossible to get at MSRP. So I’m not sure if your market research is better than Toyotas
@@COPEV2These aren't hard to find because of large demand. They're hard to find cuz Toyota is barely making any of them and their allocation system sucks.
Perfect vehicle for people who like to pretend they go camping every weekend!
The Cargo area complete undermines all of the positive aspects of the vehicle.
Apparently, Toyota is going to bring back the Landcruiser too. Wonder how that will compare to the Seqouia
hope land cruiser is more off road utility ..... not luxury wagon with 3 rows of leather . 2 sunroofs and dumbo ear trailer mirrors
Its believed to be the land cruiser prado so much smaller than this
@@jermainedouglas7301 Exactly. Less Land Cruiser (Prado).... Same Land Cruiser price (300 series)
saw an article that said it could even have a 2-door option. Maybe trying to give Bronco and Jeep a run for their money?
Worst third row and no bench seat in 2nd row when has to pick higher trim. Toyota still needs to learn lot of things.
Do they though? Because these still sell, mostly above MSRP.
While Kia hyundai chevy ford nissan hondas sit on the lot, Toyota is sold out with lines down the street , at least in Socal.
Competitive makes just hate that.Any negative Toyota comments are obviously from other manufacturers or their employees.
Please.disregard.
I dont work for or own aToyota product
19mpg city? The v8 was what 15mpg city? Watch as the v8 option becomes a luxury item like a rolex. Only for the 5%. Or for those who will finance it at 25%apr interest 😂
If you find a low mileage v8 buy it immediately.
Wow, that's a pretty quick 0-60
Great review as always, would be interesting to see this go up against Jeep GC offeoad variant & Tahoe Z71 rough terrain like Moab or the like.
the like indeed
I think Toyota REALLY messed up the Sequoia BIG time! I don’t want to choose either give up cargo room for more passenger room or give up passenger room for more cargo?! It’s really dumb.
There’s nothing dumb about it
I mean.. you can fold one side of the third row and still fit one or two people and load some things at the same time. There's nothing wrong with that.
A solution in search of a problem. Any legitimate use-case is better served by a competitor.
The flat cargo space is actually achievable if they move the battery to the spare tire space and move the spare tire to the hinge door.
Caveat is that if you take the car extreme off-roading an impact the bottom of the battery this can set the battery on fire. But its the same with all the other electric suvs and trucks.
I love this SUV and was thinking of buying one, but the moment I saw the cargo space and the 3rd-row seat - couldn't do it. I needed more room for my family, so I bought the new redesigned Honda Pilot Elite instead - very happy with the purchase. It was a very difficult decision because I love the Toyota brand and always wanted one. I wanted the Limited with the TRD package.
Made the same move, kept my 4runner and my wife got the pilot elite.
Yep, cargo space is a complete deal breaker.
I like the capstone, but the black and white interior being the only color option and lack of second row bench seat is a deal killer
Agree. For people like us who don’t need the third row seats and just want a bench in the second row. I really wish Toyota offered that package.
@@alexblankenship7385 Especially since the TRD pro is likely more outdoor recreation focused...kids and dogs
Agreed that the Sequoia's front grill not hanging over the bumper, looks a lot better than the Tundra.
Part time 4x4 makes sense IMHO as you don't 4 tires every time you get flat. Correct?
This guy gets groceries, not Baja it appears
Why they so expensive $80k I would get it if under $60k.
Inflation has been a factor in the last decade
SR5 starts at $60, but good luck finding one and avoiding dealer mark-ups.
Ask Mr. Biden...
Without a flat folding cargo space, they just killed this vehicle.
The Overtrail Editions are all the same too on all their SUVs. How can you overland & not have the ability to lay flat in your rig?
You can add a panoramic sunroof on this trim. Just FYI
10:04 naah be quiet on that part, rear independent suspension is a bad design it has more parts to break and its weak, they should just offer a non hibrid version and leave the solid axel alone, its better to sacrifice comfort than reliability, solid axel is better for towing, off-road and less maintenance issues practically maintenance free, just don't talk about the rear axel don't spoil reliable set up...
That intro perspective didn't benefit you at all sofia
Looks are amazing but the 2nd row doesn’t slide (odd) & the rear cargo is completely pointless especially considering the competitors, not sure why they made it so horrible
Definitely a dream SUV for adventure enthusiasts!
I’m waiting for Sequoia XL.
Just put 16 inch in the rear area. It will be as long as the Tundra.
I’m 6’2” and still love it!
Nice Toyota Sofyan.
They need to make it flat cargo space + removable 3rd row + rear sliding window!
That would be describing a 1st gen Sequoia.
How often are y'all sitting in 3rd rows?
most off roaders car campers overlanders never even use it ,I get car sick just thinking of back there ....back mtn roads . free way clover leafs no o s handle , you are trapped, no window to roll down , no door to open , how to you escape ? death seats the 3rd row
I love this model EXCEPT the trunk space is laughable and a deal killer.
It may just be me, but why is Toyota married to those 1995 buttons?
Welcome to the 21st century but almost every car has buttons!
I loved it before I learned about the trunk, why did they have to do that with the space?
7:09 there is a pano roof available on the trd pro
Toyota is really getting smacked around in the SUV/Truck segment. Buy the pre 2023's while you still can.
As long as.... I can get this in gasoline engine only, I'm a happy buyer! No electric or "hybrid" for me!
I sold my tundra to upgrade to this sequoia ..but now gas approaching 7 bucks per gal I have to scratch this plan..19 and 21 for a hybrid is not impressive..Toyota needs to do better
Why should I pass up a Japanese made Lexus GX for this? Since this is clearly now in Lexus price tag
VERY good point
It's nice but ...but for $80k! Manufactures continue to gouge those who can effort them in this segment of SUV
Sophie Jeep Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer have two different 3.0 V6 engines and the high output is 510 that's more than anything that Toyota spitting out there
rear axle is a plus because its the only full size SUV with it, eazy to lift most ground clearance,doesn't have. wierd tire wear when towing,way better platform to make a preeruner or trail rig. It probably doesn't have 4wd auto because they are clutch based and overheat offroad when pushed hard although some transfer cases can do it without overheating.
Solid axle is nice... you have to know what you're getting
Love this one! ❤❤❤
It should be called the "OPEC_MOBILE". If they rate it at 19 city, you can bet you will get about 14, if you drive like a 90 year old.
Waiting for Prius TRD PRO
there will be a gr prius soon possibly, but this made me laugh 🤣
Even though this is bigger it can't replace the new landcruiser sold world wise
77,000 Msrp? More like 100k with markups..
My wish list:
-Full time 4WD (I look at this as a safety feature for my family)
-Non Hybrid Option
if I win the lotery I will consider it
Woah this is a big boy!
It's priced too high
Yet people are paying above MSRP for these.
A 100k truck and Toyota forces you to pay 120 dollars a year just to use the navigation and other info tainment apps, just rediculous
Will the redesigned 4runner look similar to this?
My Toyota dealership quoted me 135k walk out price for this exact model. Is this a reasonable price? Or should I get a Denali instead?
$135K is too much even for a Escalade or Denali. This is a nice truck, but wouldn't pay more than $70K. The Nissan Armada is a solid choice at $60K
UM RN THESE ARE 80K SO DO NOT ACCEPT THAT OFFER
In reality, you shouldn’t compare it to the Hyatt Antal Amer a RAV4 you should compare it to the Chevy Tahoe or GMC as a fuel consumption just to know is it better or not?
Is it a 3.4 or 3.5 TT engine?
Per the owners manual, it's 3,445 cubic cm.
The hood badge must add a couple of ccms.
100K for a off-road with no Tow hooks?
wow man this is awesome i'm thinking about this model
Love that interior! ❤
This cool and look awesome but my goodness at above 80k that is high and a lot of options at the price.
The TRD Pro should be offered without a 3rd row.
“Toyota carries the torch?” More like, Toyota drop the torch a few miles back! 😂
I can do with the smaller space at the back but that gas tank is hella small.. I wish this was 110 litters minimum.. the patrol is at 140 lmao
I’m gonna get one of these one day, to match it with my BMW Supra
What sucks about this Sequoia is that every trim is mark up over msrp. All the Pro I’ve seen are all over $100k because of mark up. Smh.
I own a 2nd gen Sequoia and had a first gen. The tech and the looks are better on the 3rd gen, everything else is a major letdown. Less cargo capacity, less passenger space, no roll down rear window, worse packaging, and fake leather seats in an $80k+ SUV. Toyota seems to have prioritized looks and features over practicality. Oh yeah and no tow hooks.
Good enough for my ego!
Im wondering why does Honda not have a vehicle to compete with the Sequoia? Or is the Honda Pilot Trailsport the closest competitor to this vehicle
Honda doesn’t make full size SUVs because their customer base isn’t asking for them.
@@DeadAir21 thank you
Toyota half a$$ed the design. Having a 3rd row that has less volume than the smaller grand highlander is a joke! How can you mess up the cargo area this bad, considering the sequoia is based off the Tundra? Toyota blew it! Just like the new Prius rear door handles, since they advertised it as a cab. Can you imagine driving it as a cab in NYC and having to explain to every single passenger, how to open the doors? 😂
I think the Sequoia has less 3rd row than the grand highlander is because it's body on frame as well as a solid rear axle AND battery pack taking up space back there; grand highlander is unibody that can accommodate these things better
@@chibbyylolIt’s the Tahoe and other large suv body on frame?
@@curiosityredpill7030 Indeed they are, but they're not hybrids. Sequoia's nickel-metal hybride battery sits right under the 3rd row
Toyota had 15 years with the generation before this all new model. 2008! And this is what they came up with!? Lithium ion battery could have saved space, but they decide to give it old battery technology. It’s a shame. It’s not that big of a battery either, 1.5kw. Here’s another design flaw. RUclips, how to jump start 2023 Toyota Sequoia. 😂 for more laughs. 😂 the freaking truck battery is in the very back, behind a plastic panel! Yet you jump it from the fuse box, under the hood! 😂 it’s a mess!
@@chibbyylol I think mister301 knows it as well. It's just not a good design decision by Toyota. Knowing that a body on frame design would raise the floor and eats up headroom, why would Toyota put a battery under it and make the floor even higher? The owner not only has to choose between more third row legroom or more cargo room, but third row headroom will always be limited and the seat will always feel like it's on the floor. People want big 3 row suv for mainly 2 reasons, big tough look and tons of cargo plus big 3rd row seat. Sequoia aces the look, but having bottom of the class interior space kills the interests for many potential buyers.
Solid rear axle 👎🏼
This is a packaging fail on Toyotas part. Not sophisticated, which Toyotas never are, but there was more than enough time to get the suspension and battery packaging correct. GM is still tops in the segment and I don't see them at changing
A great vehicle. But, pricing is unreasonably high and out of touch with reality, for a Sequoia
2024 TRD Sequoia vs 2024 GX550 Overtrail. Tough choice
This car is very cool but the cargo area is a complete deal breaker. Can’t put dog crates in back, can’t comfortably car camp in back, can’t flat load furniture in back. That was a huge mistake on Toyota’s part.
Just like my car ❤I love sequoias!!! 😘
TOYOTA NICELY DESIGNED NOT FAN OFF BLACK WHEELS😮😮😮😮😮😮
Lmao my goodness just as the video starts the SUV looks GIGANTIC vs Soy..
I wonder if the new Lexus GX will be cheaper than the sequoia. The sequoia is overpriced
No its not over priced. Way better milage and tow capacity. The new TRD is my favorite purchase of all times. I have 420 ponies and I get 22 mpg on the hwy.
@@rhicksmtb that’s pretty good mpg. They are cool SUVs but just pricey for a Toyota in my opinion. They are really cool SUVs though and they probably are worth the money in the long run I suppose
Awesome
Wait for gx550
TRD Pro without optional 2nd row bench seats is dealbreaker for me. Captain’s chairs are comfortable no doubt but extremely not practical. I guess I’m skipping at least this year’s model.
lol imagine Toyota $80k :D
this is a 100k truck even used , Toyota is on some serious drugs I test drove it just last month its gorgeous don't get me wrong but wouldn't pay more then 70k for it
They are 80k rn
why close the hood from the side just behind the headlight? are you new to the auto industry? and blame it on the need to slam?