Should you buy Can-Am or Polaris's FASTEST Side-by-side?

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 дек 2024

Комментарии • 36

  • @jr88brutus
    @jr88brutus 3 месяца назад +62

    I don’t know why in the off road community why you guys always compare a 4 seater to a 2 seater. Stop doing it, makes you less credible.

    • @joshc606
      @joshc606 3 месяца назад +5

      It’s probably what they had available? Be a friend and go buy both for them to test.

    • @douglowenthal1320
      @douglowenthal1320 3 месяца назад +2

      Bull shit not a proper comp.

    • @Buckshot530
      @Buckshot530 2 месяца назад

      in this case, Can-Am doesn't have a 4 seater out yet for them to do a comparison with.

    • @goprozack4255
      @goprozack4255 Месяц назад +1

      You would think these people are "experts" but then do something so obvious like that.... Sad

  • @TimLaurie-b7d
    @TimLaurie-b7d 3 месяца назад +31

    Weird, the 4 seater is longer than the 2 seater?!?!?

  • @robbnutter4665
    @robbnutter4665 3 месяца назад +13

    I've always heard that Can Am has SERIOUS fit and finish issues. If the Can Am is a two seater, why didn't you compare it with a Polaris RZR Pro 2?

  • @randallcoots6725
    @randallcoots6725 29 дней назад +1

    I bought 2024 canam maverick DS turbo ×3 in Late August I absolutely love it ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @joshc606
    @joshc606 3 месяца назад +1

    I like this style of review. Better than video with just commentary.

  • @dblurton6542
    @dblurton6542 2 месяца назад

    The Trail Tech Voyager Pro GPS will link up to the Buddy Track system on a Polaris so you can do the live tracking with your non-Polaris. It also has a belt temp sensor and a two mic Bluetooth intercom.

  • @Molekulasti
    @Molekulasti День назад

    Those are some spicy golf carts.

  • @timpeifer6682
    @timpeifer6682 3 месяца назад +5

    2 differnet machines nobody talking about ..the can am is 78 inches wide the widest stock side by side in these classes has a transmission th not gunna blow every 2 seconds..the spider control arms offer 40 percent more stability and strength in upper ball joint

    • @FuckSXSBlog
      @FuckSXSBlog Месяц назад

      and somehow its still a POS.

  • @mikekitzman3607
    @mikekitzman3607 7 дней назад

    4 seater 2 seater big difference right there

  • @brianhowell8117
    @brianhowell8117 2 месяца назад

    The mavrick has 6 lug wheels the rzr has 5 lug wheel pattern crazy machines hoping toget a mav r soon

  • @Rubbermeetsrd
    @Rubbermeetsrd 3 месяца назад +4

    I bet that Can Am is missing more plastic than the panel missing on the dash. In my experience Can Am build quality is shit.

  • @jameselroy7472
    @jameselroy7472 2 месяца назад +1

    4door price is always 10k more expensive than 2dr. But its only a couple grand more expensive than the 2 seat mavrick? Thats a deal from polaris. I see the value un the rzr over mavrick

  • @KuschallRacing
    @KuschallRacing 3 месяца назад +2

    but...mav r got now as well a 4 seater....

  • @nocowhips
    @nocowhips Месяц назад

    What cage is that on the Mav R?

    • @DortonFarb
      @DortonFarb 2 дня назад

      Yeah, I'm not seeing that in the configurator.

  • @StevePaige
    @StevePaige 3 месяца назад +3

    I'll buy the Talon. Thank you.

  • @kevingoodrich3050
    @kevingoodrich3050 3 месяца назад +3

    The X3 is better overall than both. The X3 can go down trails the Mav R is to wide. It's quicker and lighter than both in both 2 and 4 seat rigs. There are trails at the Oregon Coast our friends could not go down because of the width. Have pass on both of those rigs. In the end it's you money buy what you want.

    • @madweazl
      @madweazl 3 месяца назад +2

      And then there are those of us that couldn't care less about narrow trails and blast through the open desert and sand dunes. There are different rigs for different people.

    • @GardenTrailAdventures
      @GardenTrailAdventures 2 месяца назад +1

      Not better. Different. Have both Drive Both. X3 definitely not better.

  • @BlettzaHrekleW
    @BlettzaHrekleW 3 месяца назад

    People are nuts to buy something like this ( just to drive through the woods ) , most people dout spend this on a Truck let alone a offroad sxs.. Ill stick with Cfmoto and their new Z10 that will have 225 HP but engine is capable of making 260 Hp in triple cylinder.

  • @hwinterr
    @hwinterr 3 месяца назад +5

    CVTs are great, no idea why everyone hates them lol in fact they were so good F1 banned them many years ago

  • @MichaelE-c2i
    @MichaelE-c2i 2 месяца назад

    Still prefer my 2023 Arctic Cat Wildcat XX.

  • @kirstenneil3536
    @kirstenneil3536 Месяц назад +1

    But you cant put the miles on these like you can a car so there goes your theory about value right out the window these are way over priced these days now rip off!

  • @Lopez_67
    @Lopez_67 3 месяца назад +1

    2 seater vs 4 seater 🙄
    What a pointless comparison...

  • @Debacle83
    @Debacle83 3 месяца назад +3

    Both crap. Meant to stress you out because everything breaks all while keeping you broke so you can’t actually have something that last. Like land. Gold. Silver. Your peace of mind

  • @rhuaustin9004
    @rhuaustin9004 3 месяца назад +1

    horrible comparison
    .4 door vs 2 door..

  • @stgraves260
    @stgraves260 3 месяца назад +2

    Yeah I pass on both. No way is a toy that has less technology worth more than a full size vehicle you can drive state to state and not just limited to off road use only.

  • @SPACE-IS-FAKE-777
    @SPACE-IS-FAKE-777 3 месяца назад +3

    I don’t care how much money you have, these machines are overpriced period.

  • @eamonshields2754
    @eamonshields2754 21 день назад +2

    What cage is that on the MAV R?