Muzammil bhai we are students of IR in IIUI aur hamary group mein secular, Marxist, liberal as well as Believers and Islamist, Follwers of Javed Ahmed Ghamidi, Eng M. ali Mirza, And Dr Israr Ahmed aur hamari chai pe kia hi khobsorat aur intellectual discussion hoti hai aur iska maza hi kuch aur hai
Sir, in a secular country everyone has the right to worship without any discrimination. Same applies to an Islamic country, anyone can worship according to their religion, and you cannot force anyone to except Islam or damage their books and places of worship or stop them for carrying out their religious activities. Our problem is that we (Muslims) have not even read our own book and followed maulvis, who failed to fulfil their purpose. Moreover, Islam presents us with the best political system. There was, is, and will never exit a model that is better than what Islam has presented.
we all know how much muslim respect it's minorities. And how much islamic Republic like Pakistan protect the non Muslims. as a Muslim.. you feel bad when a person burn Qur'an but few months ago a hindu temple was demolished in Karachi Pakistan and a building complex is being made there.. hundreds of Christian home were destroyed ... I have seen Muslim in this comment section justify it why do you need temples in Pakistan.. In 2014 the organization, the All Pakistan Hindu Rights Movement (PHRM), published a survey report. The survey report found that 95% of the temples present in Pakistan since 1990 were destroyed or damaged. Out of the 428 places of worship, only 20 remained operational while 408 temples were converted either into commercial properties or into residential establishments. Out of the 20 temples, 11 were in Sindh, 4 in Punjab, 3 in Balochistan and 2 in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Babri Masjid demolition in India only hastened the pace of temple demolition across Pakistan and Bangladesh. Around 1,000 temples were alone targeted or destroyed in Pakistan and 2014 PHRM survey findings continue to reflect in 2021 as well. From 20 operational temples in 2014, Pakistan now only has 13 temples managed by ETPB. we all know the love what you give non Muslim specially Christian.. . In 1947 Muslims threatened Christians that Pakistan was made for Muslims only and that if Christians wanted to stay there, they had to live a life of servitude and perform sanitation work.. "Sewer Cleaners Wanted in Pakistan: Only Christians Need Apply." Remember this add by pakistani army in 2020. Guess nothing much change here..
Dear brother, I have started reading the Quran in effort to learn about my religion as much as possible. After watching hundreds of thousands of Islamic videos and reading the Quran myself, I have not found a single Ayat/verse or a hadith which commands Muslims to demolish the places of worship of other religions. I have mentioned above that the problem with modern Muslims is that they are too much dependent on maulvis and do not make the effort to read the translation of the Quran themselves and try to understand what it says. You know that (On the Day of Judgement) the Messenger, peace be upon him, will say: "My Lord, my people had abandoned this Qur’an." Surah: 25, Verse: 30. During the time of Caliph 'Umar certain Muslims had taken a piece of land belonging to a Jew. They constructed a mosque on it. 'Umar ordered the demolition of the mosque and the restoration of the land to the Jew. This event shows that I cannot take anyone land forcefully. The problem is that most of the Muslims are not even aware of this event, sad. I am really sorry for whatever Muslims have done with the minorities in Pakistan or anywhere in the world. It is always hard to see videos of Muslim/Muslims treating non-Muslims horribly or reading comments containing the stories of non-Muslims suffered at the hand of Muslims. After seeing such videos, I am 110% certain that these people have not read a single a page of the Quran with translation and barely open the Quran for recitation. Lastly, religious extremism does not exist amongst Muslims in Pakistan because it is a part of Islam, and this is what Islam teaches. No, they all have to deal with a lot of problems while living in Pakistan that their minds do not function as of those living in developed countries like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, USA, etc etc.
@@On.007 well I have read my bible and it has a very good passage.. 'do unto others what you want others to do unto you ' well it's hilarious when we see muslim pointing out isreal about the killing and Palestine or even Rohingaya or kashmir .. While the same won't say a word about the virtual annihilation by killing forced migration of non Muslim community in islamic country. Where the native population is refused to below 5% in some places below 1% like afghanistan Pakistan Indonesia even all meddle east. Jews in Muslim countries are in 3/4 digit.. If you want respect the respect others , the reality is Muslim treat its minorities like shit.. and they are real xenophobe.. and it's not just limited to specific country The Taliban destroyed the tallest buddist didnt they.. Turkey convert hayia Sofia into a mosque again.. over 100 Christian churches have been converted to mosque just in turkey.. do you want me to give you the list.. Pakistan and Bangladesh has destroyed more than 1000 small and big temples.. churches Have you ever asked why are the population of 56 Muslim countries, 39 have 88%+ Muslim population, of which 31 islamic majority country have 95%+ muslim population.. Why is it that it is impossible for non Muslim to live in these islamic country.. The Persian left for india.. The Afghanistan lost it Buddhist monastery But how many islamic country condemn the virtual inhalation of sikh from afghanistan who were 6 mn in '71 .. And less than 100 left today.. Or the forced conversion and marriage of hindu and Christian under age girls in Pakistan.. The inhalation of Ahemidia in Pakistan Indonesia and kurdistani mens and thier girls turkey syria Iraq Iran. Kurds have had a long history of discrimination perpetrated against them by the Turkish government. Massacres have periodically occurred against the Kurds since the establishment of the Republic of Turkey in 1923. you feel the pain when you are in minority.. And demand equal rights and secularism.. But won't give it to non Muslim minority in Islamic countries.. even under shariya law as per dhimini in pact of umar.. You demand that you guys should be respected but where is the same respect when you distroy temples and churches and gurdwara and buddist sites.. You want others to not mix religion and politics.. but killed thousands in blaplhamy laws... Muhammed.. Dint he destroyed temples of hubal in mecca after war of bidr.. If Muhammed didn't respect others feeling why should we care about your.. Your muslim rulers and scholars have burnt libraries of ancient knowledge.. Your violent mob did it again last month ago in France.. And you are hurt by just one.. When gajnavi came to destroy somnaath he could have stopped by just looting the temple . As requested by the pundits.. But he didn't wanted to be just a looter he wanted to be an idol destroyer .. And you guys consider him your hero.. So if you guys didn't respect us why do you expect respect from us.. Islamic law in quran can never be apolitical or secular.. Because quranshreef isn't secular.. It give second class treatment for non Muslim the overall attitude of islamic world.. That's hypocrisy of islamic world don't you feel I'm sorry I still have not heard a single word of condemnation from any muslim.. May be they are afraid to be called khafir because they went against islamic ummah
@@On.007I don't blame Muslims for the hate .. as individuals they are great.. But face it the teaching of islam.. give you a superiority complex over non Muslim.. hence you essentially don't find it odd or disgusting how non Muslim minorities are treated in Muslim countries..
how you can say that pakistan is secular . Non muslim cannot become the PM ?. No government fund to make minorirties worship place ? .Overal whole educational system is just islam . in english hazrat muhammad chapter. in urdu same. in islamiyat same. after imran khan faheem ul quran and diff other courses .
no non muslim can become pm of pakistan for your kind information even a muslim cannot become pm of pakistan, only pup-pet suggested by usa can become pm of pakistan, second point, Pkaistan goverment has also never funded any constructon of mosque and your expect them to make temples in pakistan? educational system is islam? are you being sarcastic? then why is universities of pakiistan have become a hub of zina? only fedral school system have a bit of islamic education and even that is thanks to our ulama who worked hard to establish islamic education in schools, private colleges and universities dont even know i or islam, from the day 1 of creation of pakistan till now liberal elites and industrialists are ruling this country and you think pakistan is islamic country
Why should government make non Muslim worship place do non Muslim countries make Muslim worship places?? When was the last time UK, USA, Australia Germany France head of state a Muslim?
I just can't emphaisis how amazing this series is,getting to know soo much about the topics that have never been talked about.and taught in schools.Getting my actual schooling here.Jazakallah muzamil bhai
As a Pakistani Christian now Living in a secular state has granted me a sense of freedom and diversity that I cherish. It saddens me that educated individuals like Muzammil advocate for Pakistan to be an Islamic country, especially when they have had the opportunity to witness the progressiveness of secular nations.
Just for constructive discussion, What exactly bother you when you hear about Pakistan as an Islamic State. Or what are the thought that make you sad about it?
@@farhanaziz1177 Secularism fosters a more just, tolerant, and prosperous society, where the government serves all citizens impartially and focuses on common national goals rather than divisive religious agenda. minorities face significant legal and societal barriers. in Pakistan, we have Blasphemy laws (Sections 295, 298) that lead to violence and imprisonment. Anti-Ahmadiyya laws (Ordinance XX) restrict Ahmadis' religious freedom. Forced conversions affect minorities, especially women. Constitutional Article 41(2) limits non-Muslims from top leadership. Reserved seats offer limited political representation. Oath requirements exclude non-Muslim officials. Islamic Ideology Council influences laws, while Hudood ordinances and Islamic family laws disadvantage minorities.
Ground level is even more worse. Mashal Khan lynching in Mardan (2017), the Ghotki riots (2019), the attack on the Ahmadiyya community in Gujranwala (2014), the assault on Sikh Gurdwara in Peshawar (2020), Kasur mob lynching (2017), Karachi Hindu temple attack (2021), Chakwal Ahmadiyya mosque assault (2012), Rahim Yar Khan Hindu temple vandalism (2021), Rawalpindi Ahmadiyya community attack (2014), Gojra riots (2009), Sialkot lynching of Sri Lankan national (2021), and Swat mob incident (2024). these are common people taking selfies while mob lynching.
Ground level is even more worse. Mashal Khan lynching in Mardan (2017), the Ghotki riots (2019), the attack on the Ahmadiyya community in Gujranwala (2014), the assault on Sikh Gurdwara in Peshawar (2020), Kasur mob lynching (2017), Karachi Hindu temple attack (2021), Chakwal Ahmadiyya mosque assault (2012), Rahim Yar Khan Hindu temple vandalism (2021), Rawalpindi Ahmadiyya community attack (2014), Gojra riots (2009), Sialkot lynching of Sri Lankan national (2021), and Swat mob incident (2024). these are common people taking selfies while mob lynching
As a minority in Pakistan, we feel profound pain, hopelessness, and a sense of inferiority. We harbor deep anger and resentment towards those who defend this Islamic system like muzammil which perpetuates our suffering and denies us basic rights and dignity.
Unbiased Suggestion: You should consider inviting Khalid Mahmood Abbasi to your podcast to discuss the topic of the country's system with him. He is a prominent Islamic scholar who also has a deep understanding of the secular system, so I believe this conversation will be incredibly insightful.
Yes , aside of the fact that he's implying that Malaysia or UAE are true islamic ( or closer to that) country Which isn't the case really. We need to call spade a spade,I have tons of respect for muzammil but we can't say those countries represent true islamic system because they show diversity very well and economically better etc etc. many things which are happening in UAE are very very unslamic. Islam doesn't allow that. Islam is progressive in different sense but it's not in the way we think about the term ' progressive ' - which allows everything and total freedom. Nah , allowing everything ( like UAE does in the name of entertainment) is counter productive and create problems. Islam doesn't want unnecessary problems to be created. So there are clear dos and don'ts in islamic system which we can't dismiss. Infact we should embrace that aspect of true islamic system
Hi brother how are u I hope your fine . Non Muslim pay jizya because for there protection and other things like business tax and other things etc . Muslim pay tax in non Muslim country that's not jizya because jiyz is only taken in Muslim countries
@@Mr-HALAL-OFFICIALProtection from whom? Sir! And tax may should be paid just like muslim pay road tax, Income tax, house tax, GST etc . why a person pay tax because he is not muslim?
They don't have to pay jiziya. When itmam e hujjat was completed and the truth was made clear to the people to the last degree, the disbelievers, who persisted in rebellion, were sentenced to death. But ehl e kitab (Jews and Christians), who were not rebellious, rather they persisted to claim that they only believed in one God, and did not consider themselves polytheists were given this option to pay jiziya. This was a matter of that time only. Nabi Pak PBUH k baad yeh kaam baad k anay walay insano ko krnay ki koi hedayt nhi di gaii.
Pakistan mei to wese hi non Muslim sai jizya Lena bnta hi NHI Islam ki roo se bhi dekhein kyunke Pakistan koi aisa mulk nhi hai Jo musalmanon ne koi non Muslims SE Jang krke hasil Kiya bhai😅😅
If Pakistan should be an Islamic state then there should be no problem with india being Hindutva state and all the West should recline to Christianity. That would be great idea, isn't? And please also do a podcast with Sahil Adeem on speed of light and sound because he has a "Dil ki baat " on speed of sound. It will help Pakistan a lot.
@@muhammadtallal3104 Yep, but it intensified in last few months. Crux of the matter is that they have been in war for just a piece of land which they consider holy as per their perspective. There are obviously political issues underpinning this but it's actually Israel's ideological narrative which is the cause of fire. And it's fanned by Hamas time and again.
What's the problem with that? Do you think Western countries don't recognise themselves as having Christian heritage? Do you think Christian values don't shape the values of European societies? India is a Hindutva state and under the right wing they've made the most military, economic and political progress. They religious right wing of India has overlooked huge success. Should you discount their success from their ideology? If so then why connect out failure to our ideology or lack of?
For me personally, understanding of islamic state and islamic system made lot easier by syed Abul Aala modudi. Firstly appreciated Muzamil on this great intiative of intellectual topics. When we discuss about islamic system on state level it's not about sects it's more about principles. My understanding it's not about sunni, shia, brelvi, deobandi or ahl e hadees, its more about islamic education system, it's about interest free banking system it's about islamic social system etc. when you set these basic principles on state level you won't have troubles in sect. And all sect are agreed on basic principles just like federal shariat court on interest free banking. Some books of Syed abul aala modudi on this topics. 1. Tankeehat 2. Islami nizam e Zindagi aur is k bunyadi tasawaurat 3. Islami hakoomat kis tarhan qaim hoti hai 4. Islami riyasat
Zakat k system par aaj tak consensus nahi hoa. Triple talaq ya khula pr hr firqa apna fatwa deta ha jab k ye court aur state ki authority ha k wo kya qanon implement kry aur kya judgment dy. Wirasat k mamly ma log apna firqa badal lety ha. Democracy ko mazhabi tabqa shirk kahta ha. Ab pichay sood ko on principle khatm krny ka irada ha lekin koi alternative nahi dya gya system ko. Mujy nahi samj aati wo konsy principles hy jis pr tmam firqo ka itefaq ha aur shariat k ein mutabiq ha.
@DanishAli-rm2ky You are talking childishly that if we take any initiative, there will be disagreement among people, wherever there are people, there will be disagreement, it is not surprising. All sects of Pakistan have given 22 points to the government to implement the Islamic system. On which all sects of Pakistan agree. What is the excuse after that? (If you want 22 points, I will paste them here.) These questions arise on secularism if we bring secularism to Pakistan, which one should we take? We know that, wherever secularism has been imposed on the people, it has been enforced through bloodshed, so do you want bloodshed in Pakistan? secularism comes in various forms and interpretations shaped by historical, cultural, and political contexts. How will you decide and get people to agree on what kind of secularism we want? It is a separate matter that the majority of Pakistan does not want this.
Great. And even if disagreement arises it can be solved and common ground can be found in majority of issues with discussions and debates and if not majority can decide. So some people making It look like it's not possible and because they don't want to discuss about islamic system or want its implementation they keep repeating that line ' oh whose version will be, there will be disagreements and problems '... As if problems don't occur otherwise and debates don't happen in other systems.
@@mrmuhammad11today millions of Pakistanis themselves run to live in secular countries..barring Afghanistan no Muslim country has implemented full sharia,even Saudi Arabia which gave Islam to the world has 5% atheists and 19% non religious people according to Gallup survey..educated Muslim countries tend to become secular while uneducated lean towards sharia…look at the plight of women in Afghanistan and Iran…
*17:18** bharat me minority itne khatre me h ki inki abadi lagatar badh rahi h, wahi Pakistan me minority itni safe h ki inki abadi lagatar kam ho Rahi h 😂 dono ko compare mat Karo Bhai, hindu to hamesha hi non Hindus ko kafir bolta h or Muslim to non Muslim ka bahut hi samman karta h* 😂😂😂
27:35 But we have 22 points of Ulama on which scholars from all the sects were agreed upon as the main points of Shariah Law that should be implemented on the state
Muzammil, this is a very logical and excellent analysis. I agree that Pakistan should be an Islamic state where the system is based solely on the laws of Allah, and minorities are given complete rights. As for the practicality and differences among sects, no sect opposes the idea of an Islamic system, the elimination of interest (riba), or the punishment for rapes. These are some basic fundamentals on which everyone agrees. Islam provides comprehensive practical implications that will never become obsolete. For example, the Islamic economic system does not seek to abolish private property, as was done by communism, nor does it prevent individuals from serving their self-interest. Instead, it tries to promote human brotherhood, socio-economic justice, and the well-being of all through an integrated role of moral values, market mechanisms, families, society, and good governance. Additionally, I believe we need an intellectual revival. For this, we will need to establish around 100 institutions similar to Bayt al-Hikmah from the Islamic Golden Age. This revival will encompass science, technology, and our mindset. This is a step towards a new age of discourse, and together, we can be the ones to initiate it.
Yes sir but everyone is following the same Quran and Sunnah. And in an "Islamic state" it is very bland to say k Quran ka nizam lain. But which version? That is the biggest issue in such a system.
@@MrAhmed-dx5hwWhich version, what does it mean? Lol. Islam is the one, there is no version of Islam, there is only one Qur'an, only one Sunnah. This question arises on secularism that if we want to bring secularism, which one should we bring? Secularism is an ambiguous concept that can refer to many ideas and policies.
One thing I would like to add is even though islam doesn't stop individuals growth in anyway, it emphasis and encourage collective growth of the society and Muslims. If in any instance, supposedly there is a situation which becomes like individual growth of one person Vs collective benefit , islamic system will decide in favour of collective benefit everyday. And that individual person might feel hard done by he has to let go of his immense growth for the sake all Muslims around him and Deen itself says He will be rewarded tremendously at the end so even he's not in loss and that's the beauty of islam
@@MrAhmed-dx5hw bro, sorry but that repeated argument doesn't wash anymore ' whose version it will be' - if anyone do his study and research he will know that majority of what contains islamic system doesn't have any disagreement of any sect. Some issues of disagreement can be decided with discussions among scholars and if still few remain, majority can set the rules without being too harsh on a minority. You can't use this argument to pretend islamic system isn't applicable in Pakistan or in any other place, we all know in secular system majority of the times majority choose and minority have to accept that and nobody has a problem with that but as soon as islamic system is discussed you start to have a problem with ' versions' and 'majority/minority ' issues . Don't do insincere arguments.
The main problem with our Islamic system is that we do claim that we're an Islamic state but generally speaking it doesn't seem to be.I would say,in my opinion, studying religion is very very important for that not just practicing everything that's been going on throughout the history in our mosques and schools,do research on your own, re understand religion for that.
@@bobbyeditz765I am sunni Muslim and I feel you are right, it is better for Pakistan to be secular than to be a theocracy where the rulers would even use our religion to control people , it will hurt Islam in the long learn and there is a very good chance it will make people hate religion altogether
Mashallah what a comprehensive analysis put together by you Muzammil! Agreed totally to majority of your opinions with an exception to a few ( i promise only a few 😂). Islam as a state religion can not only solve all of the problems Pakistan is going through currently but shall also pave the way for it to be a model islamic country for the Ummah. A Theocratic state somehow also seems possible to me when majority of the Ulma can agree on basics, principalities and core values and leave the nitty gritties for the people to decide and act upon by making them capable enough through a systematic educational and intellectual change. And yes Economics and Knowledge are the only way forward for this country. Very enthusiastic and excited to see you have an intellectual discourse of this type with Sahil Adeem Bhai and Qaisar Ahmed Raja. Itll be a delight to these sore eyes. Please please a humble request 🥺
Whoever supporting islamic state of Pakistan i hope they will also support a hindu state of India and Han Chinese state and Jewish state of Israel ( a considerable population of israel is muslims )
I will support Hindu state of India and Jewish state of Israel if they are coming from majority of people and shouldn't percecutue any minority or innocent
Religious freedom is one of the basic rights of a human being. These Islamists will never understand this. I am a christian in Pakistan and I am disgusted by what the country has become and what the people think of other minorities. I just want to escape.
There is a word called democracy if you ever heard, if majority of people voted in favor of a secular system in their countries, why would anyone have any problem with them and besides Islam ke ilawa dosre mazahib ka koi administrative system hai hi nahi bas ibadat han
State should not give patronage to any religion bcz in a state there live many people who profess different types of faith and religion... Religion is a personal matter and no one should impose particular faith over others.. Secular .
Bro I get your concern. But see, the difference is that Islam is not like any other Religion. Islam is fundamentally considerate of Other religions. It is forbidden for a Muslim government to disturb or destroy the Religion and Religious symbols of other religions. See examples of Hazrat Umar rebuilding the Temple Mount worship place for Jews. Salahuddin ayubbi allowing Christians to live peacefully after conquering Jerusalem. And much more. The problem here is that some people claim to be Muslims but they don't follow rules of Islam. They are Hypocritical and are calling for Allahs wrath.
Awesome MashAllah, So true- An Islamic System needs to be robust and flexible enough with each era that it readily caters all needs of Muslims at local and global level. Stagnation of islamic thought is the reason of Muslim ummah's decline. We try finding old solutions for new problems! We cannot just look back and find all solutions, new models (economic, educational, political etc) need to be devised on islamic principles, not old methodologies. Elements of islamic system need to be selected from all ideologies of past and present, those elements which conform with deen ul islam principles, e.g. we cannot shun socialism altogether as you described coz Islamic state ought to be a welfare state and much more inshaaAllah, such a great effort!
In which hole you are living brother, Pakistan is already a secular state. But people of Pakistan don't have secular values, nor Islamic😀...but as far as state is concerned it is a distorted version of secularism where no morals exist and corruption is a norm. Your short answer to seculars is not making any sense. You should thrive to make Pakistan an Islamic State and first step would be admitting its not Islamic
@TabraizBajkani how Sindh will be Secular ? Is Sindh was Secular why did you guy throw out your own Sindhi Hindu during 1947 ? Why small Hindus girl are being force converted in Sindh ?
@@atifhameed-ic9hk as i said they already shared there views on eon podcast, you can check it out, that;s not the ultimate system we want, sahil adeem wants jung and Qaisar ahmad raja focused on madrassa
To understand the Islamic system, you should invite Qaisar ahmed Raja on your podcast, he can give you a clear explanation about it and also inform you about its implementation.
Bhai if qaisar can explain then you as a follower can also explain. For example Please brief us about the process of electing the Ruler according to sharia.
Sahi bat he hum agar apne app ko musalman kehte hain to phir islam ke mudabiq he sab kuch karna chahye. Lekin narrow minded hone ke be apne nuksan hain.
Lynching does not make a country religious.... Its your constitution that matters ..... Indian constitution does not follow any religion, only people follow religion.... While on the other hand Pakistani people follow religion and also Pakistan's constitution follows Islamic principles so India is sceular by constitution and Pakistan is Islamic by constitution..... Whether you believe believe it or not but even a single sentence in your constitution which gives priority to a particular religion can never be Secular.... Pakistan is not secular whether you believe it or not... And India is 100% secular whether you believe it or not..... Not a single sentence in our constitution gives priority to a particular religion..... Muslim can become PM of India according to Constitution while Non Muslim can not become PM of Pakistan by Pakistani constitution says everything about Non secular Pakistan.....
@@masroorkhalil9655Why? A Pakistani citizen should have right to be a president irrespective of religion! That's why Islam can never be secular, Islam in itself is communal.
First see the shape of economy of turkey and inflation which is more than 55% Malaysia was never an Islamic country it became recently because the overbreeding problem muslims have and slowly becoming radical, same with Indonesia.
From last 1400, thousands of Islamic Scholars wrote multiple Hadiths, Tafasirs, translations and interpretations to understands One Books, but still fail to understand. Doubts and Confusions are growing day by day. This is happening bcz that book is vague, outdated and impractical. Every Scholar has its own interpretations and consider other as Kaffir, Gumrah, Jahannami. Thats why many Firqas came out over the period of time. Thats why Adam Seeker, Zafar Heretics like people becoming popular in youth in Pakistan. Kfss
Yes! Jizya tax is far more humane than todays modern tax on literally everything. It is only one time per annum and excludes women, children, sick, poor and elderly
@@Fundamental_Islam.😂😂😂 So essentially it is a protection tax.. Morden tax is not for protection but for resources.. it equal to all No will Muslims be ok to be discriminated against based on their religion and call it Islamophobia.. but are ok when they do it
7:28 Muzamil Bhai Did you know that Pakistan's constitution and laws restrict non-Muslims from holding high-level positions in government and state institutions? Articles 2, 41, 91, and 260 enshrine Islam as the state religion, requiring key officials to be Muslim. Discriminatory laws and social biases further marginalize non-Muslim communities, limiting their representation and opportunities. Unfortunately, these barriers make it challenging for Pakistan to become a secular country, perpetuating inequality and exclusion. So how you can say's that Pakistan is actually a secular country????
Pakistan is not a secular country. It isn't an Islamic country either. The reason why non-Muslims can't hold positions of policy making is because the policies of Pakistan have to made according to the Quran and Sunnah. Will they rule through Quran and Sunnah. Its like in a liberal country a communist cannot come into power as they have a different worldview.
A Pakistani could never understand Indian secularism and Pakistani secularism because the majority of the people in Pakistan are Muslims and Majority of Indians are Hindus..... Islam has rules written in Quran and if the majority of people follow that religion then it automatically becomes a Non secular state because majority of the people are Non secular... While in the case of India, Hinduism is not a rules based religion, no rules are written for Hindus to be followed, so if a country has Hinduism in majority then it can never be a religious country..... India is proper secular because majority people don't use a religion based on a book while Pakistan may not be a proper Islamic country but the fact is majority of the people follow a religion with a preset idea of religion so Pakistan can never be Secular like Hindus ...... Muzammil should come to India and see for himself what real Secularism looks like..... Just saying India is following Hindu ideology can never make India a religious country.... India ko samajna ek Muslim Pakistani k liye namumkin hai.....
@@mahmad8528 well our constitution does not say a Muslim can not become India's PM. While Pakistan's constitution says Non Muslim can not be Pakistan's PM. Constitution gives right to a citizen and our constitution is secular while Pakistan's Constitution is not secular......
Woah, this video actually gave me a new perspective on this topic. Excellent video Muzamil bhai. Also, I highly recommend everyone to read "Islam and Politics" by mufti Taqi Usmani.
Very beautifully presented. Easy to absorb even for the layman. No matter what our stances are, it is important to be able to realize the realities around the world. This comes when we expose ourselves to other societies/economies/countries. Travelling, reading, following a diverse range of people on your social media, watching content of diverse people, etc, this is what helps in increasing your critical thinking and getting out of the bubble of "i know everything". Kudos to you for creating an environment where you engage in and encourage 'parhi likhi baatein'. May Allah keep us guided in the right path.
Thanks for initiating the discussion muzammil. I am an agnostic atheist and these following are my concerns/fears from a future Islamic republic: What would be the punishment of blasphemy? Would i be allowed to change my religion in official documents to no religion? Would there be apostate punishment? Would i be allowed to buy and drink alcohol? What would be the punishment of eating publicly in ramzan? Can a I as non Muslim be a prime minister? Would government demand me paying jazya i.e extra tax for my safety as non muslim?
I am a christian. Forget all other points. Just being able to work at higher positions at government level would be enough of a right for non muslims. But unfortunately these radical islamist will never let that happen. Pakistan should never become an islamic state or we will see the next afghanistan.
You’re doing a good job. We all need to educate ourselves and take interest in such discussions that will ultimately generate a true value system with calm, intellectual, educated and smart individuals. Thank you !
As usual, amazing content with respected delivery to the audience. I think we need more discussions of the sort, to sit across a table and decide our way of direction. Mixing dairh rupay ki secularism and Islamisation is bringing everything but progress. I too agree that after the 2020s, a sense of intellectual renaissance is slowly unfolding in Pakistan now, rising steadily in the upcoming days
As you described, why islamic system is good for us, please invite someone who can deliberately explain Islamic System and it's benefits, I encourage you to invite Saahil Adeem. Both of you guys can actually brainstorm, and present exact Islamic system in details, or for the matter of fact, the audience would know why islam!
Riysasat e Medina Kehna behtr hai bajaye secular Ka manjan baichna west, India ya certain element KO Khush krne k.lye. And I am not a supporter of Imran khan or PTI - a party jokers from top to bottom.
Yeh konsi rayasat e madina the jahan nach gana sab horha tha ?? Mazhab k naam pe pagal banana humare syasat dano ka mashghala raha hai.. Imran khan shb bhe koe dodh k dhulay nhe !! Puri qoum ko 2 manjan bechay ek rayasat e madina ka aur ek Ertugrul 😂 Khud sahab zaday establishment ki paidawar hen aur qoum ko haq aur batil sikha rhy hen lol... Koe bataega T.L.P kis ne launch ki the ? Tha na mazhab ka manjan ?
Dear Muzamil, Dont pay heed towards negative people and negative comments..Your thoughts are pragmatic, and useful for all pakistanis..we can see the sincerity behind those sentences..Please keep sharing your ideas cause your opinion is relatable and it really matters🤍
I agree with you, we need to have a proper societal and economic structure in place and act upon it for a certain period of time before we can move on to the discussions like secularism vs islamic laws, since that is not the biggest problem right now and will have no inpact if either of the system if fully or partially implemented. I think that we need to solve our core issues at state level which is economy and at societal level which is education so that an educated population which is relatively well off can then take part in the discussions like these to create a proper, permanent framework of the society and the state.
@@atifhameed-ic9hk Yes, but the implementation of a new system starts from somewhere, it is an intricate process that is done carefully, step by step through proper planning. And for that to happen, the society needs to be relatively at peace, which happens if people are a bit well off economically and that obviously happens if you have skills which are gained through education.
@@AbdulaImran dear, To move forward, we need to define our direction by creating a new system. This will clarify our identity as an Islamic state or a secular one. The starting point of the system will shape our future and help us address core issues effectively. It will guide economic and educational. By establishing a clear system, we build a prosperous, cohesive society.
@@atifhameed-ic9hk I absolutely agree on the new system thing, obviously this system has absolutely failed and that's why there is even a need for a new system. But to create a new system, we must have a starting point, which we have to find from the existing system, since we can't create a new system out of nothingness, we first need to identify what sort of issues there are in our existing system before we define something new, since the new system needs to exist for upcoming years rather than being a temporary fix. This is what I think about this
@@AbdulaImran I agree that identifying problems is crucial, but I also believe that starting from the older system may introduce more challenges. While we don't have "nothingness," the emotions of people who desire change are significant. So, if we try to fix this problem with the existing system, it would only increase the hopelessness in the people who already want change.
2 scholars for riba free alternative economic system: - Bila Sood Bankaari Nizam by Dr. Tahir ul Qadri - iqtisaadiyaat e islaam by Dr. Tahir ul Qadri - Mufti taqi usmani sb's research on bila sood bankaari
Hi Muzammil, your namesake here. In principle, I do think that the model where state oversees the matters of religion is something that may work but there are catastrophic problems with it when it comes to practicality. In Saudia Arab, the imam of Kabaa cannot mention the politiical duty of the state in order to boycott Israel in order to put pressure, any of cleric who talks against MBS' decisions of modernizing the country is put in jail. In Pakistan, I can see an even severe version of this. The majority of the population definitely doesn't want to go there and given that people are emotionally driven something like that might even result in a huge civil unrest.
Tbh I was thinking the same about you being a pro secular and an anti Islamic person. The good news is you're not and are willing to show flexibility depending on the argumentation and the conclusion is ''Husn Zan rakhna chahiye apne bhaee k baray main.'' And I would request that aik podcast qaiser ahmed raja aur sahil adeem se kerein please.
Agree, hum as a nation abhi itny educated nhi huey k different opinions ko hazam kr sakain, isliye backlash milta hy apko, apki ye video shayd k 10 saal bad majority nation smjhny k kabil hogi q k revolution a raha hy log politicians or so called neem mullah khatra emaan k effects sy nikal rahy hain. But very well done I appreciate your efforts and your courage to speak about the topics which many people don’t get into just to avoid the backlash they will get from the hyper nation. 😊
Sir please watch Asad Zaman’s podcast on Islamic Financial Systems as well as Shershah’s episode on evolution of Islamic civilization over the last 1000 years. Both are available on the channel.
Why aren't you talking about the biggest crisis atm, the G@z@ situation. I went through all the video, and i couldn't find one on thid topic except one podcast with AlKhidmat head Khalid Mahmood? Kindly share if there is one i might have missed. But people like you should talk about such issues. It matters a lot.
whilst i am happy youtubers from pakistan are trying to raise the level of conversation on these type of topics , its a shame that someone cannot really research the topic they are speaking on as it is far more complex then presented , many of the examples need further clarification , for example the confused stance that allowing interest makes pakistan secular lol , or that countires that are on paper secular put pressure in a religious way on the public , its better to really make people understand the idea of secularism and how western nations came to remove religion from state and the reasons why , the short answer to the question is true secular countries are better on most good human indexes then most religious countries especially islamic countries which are some of the worst across indexes
Respectedly, I don't agree with you ke g Pakistan ki Masjid main toh Negativity phelaayi ja Rahi hai jabke Saudia or Middle East main Spirituality sikhayi ja Rahi hai, jabke agar actual baat ki jaaye toh Pakistan ki masajid se Sada E Haq buland hoti hai or Saudi Arabia ki Masajid ka Imam Regulated hota hai Jo ke khud aapne maana. Pakistani Aalim E Deen ya Imam apni Society ki Problems and Pakistan ki Ground Realities ko dekhte huwe hi logo tak ek lessonable speech deliver karta hai jabke Saudi Arabia main agar koi Aalim E Deen aisi Islamic Terms ki BAAT kare Jo ke Saudi State ke khilaaf ho toh use wese hi Dhar liya jata hai jese yahan pe Kuch kaali Vigos aati hain. Ab agar baat ki jaaye Islamic State ki ke woh actually hai Kya toh I agree ke Pakistani State bilkul bhi Islamic Rules and Principles of Governance ko follow Nahin Karti but actually agar Sahaba ki Governance ko dekha jaaye toh wahan yeh nizaam hargiz Nahin tha ke g Jo cheezein State decide kare bus wahi religion hai jabke koi or agar ikhtelaaf kare toh use utha lo never aisa bilkul bhi Nahin huwa. Jabke badqismati se Saudi Arabia main agar baat ki jaaye Religious Freedom ki toh woh na hone ke barabar hai or aap use acha keh Rahe hain? Actually agar baat ki jaaye Seculars ki toh woh toh har waqt Freedom Of Speech ka wird alaanpte rehte hain toh ab Saudia main kahan gayi FOS? Lastly i'm happy to see you bro ke aap dono aspects share kr rahe hain and aapne disclaimer bhi diya ke main aql e kul Nahin hoon Kisi ko mujhse bhi koi ikhtelaaf ho sakta hai.
Whenever I come to your channel I feel happy that at least someone is touching upon these important topics then I see your subscribers and feel sad they ae really low, I want this to reach each and every Pakisani.
Fact: Pakistan was built to provide a land where all religion should co-exist and live with each other that's why it wasn't Islamic republic of Pakistan till 1973.
Not entirly true for reference do study constitutions (3 diff) we had and struggle between different govts(civil nd mil) and constitution making assemblys in short even back then it was controversial topic e.g: Issue of qadianiat and sacking of Zafar ullah khan and others
Regardless of what the forefathers thought, my personal opinion is that the state should be Islamic. One should not base their identity on the beliefs of their forefathers rather use their own intellect.
Janab ap aik galti kar rhy nationalism main kabi bhi islami nizam nhi aa sakhta islami nizam ky leye sb muslim ko aik he land pe hona zaroori hai warna Afghanistan wali imarat tu aay gyi lakin khilafat nhi is leye islam main nationalism nhi
I found out this very fascinating thing by the way. Have someone ever noticed that the people from all the other religions like Christianity, Judaism and Sanatan have to leave their religion and becomes secular to progress before that they were all in their dark ages. But for Muslim there was an exception. When the stuck to their religion Islam and its values they ruled the world they had a golden age they were more powerful than any other Empire or nation in the world. The moment they left the Islam they started crumbling and we can see the conditions today.
You made one mistake where you assumed Barelelvi is a sect. Its not a sect. Its an identity. The sect is Sunni. Calling oneself a barelvi means. We follow teachings of the prophet. But we use the knowledge given to us by Alaa Hazrat for better understanding of islamic teachings.
@AbdullahKurd. think of it this way... Each sect is a house of cards. Where if the foundation is weak... the whole thing falls apart... Ahmedi believe there's another prophet... clearly this is wrong af. So we can ignore this one easily Deobandi and wahabi believe the final prophet doesn't have as much power and isn't alive in their Graves... which clearly is wrong so another easy one to ignore Ismail was founded by a man who was looking to gain power and money and he became wealthy by doing it. Aga khan is their leader and has never practiced actual teachings of Islam... so If it cracks like a duck.. it's a duck... Another easy to let go Shia.... they curse sahabas and this is a huge no no... so another easy one to ignore... Whats left... sunnism... Where we never do any of the above. So by process of elimination... this sect is the right one
Let me give you a hypothesis that why a secular Pakistan would benefit Pakistan and solve most issues that Pakistan faces today. 1) Secular education will bring about the change in mindset of Pakistanis. 2) Fundamentalism will be reduced due to change in mindset 3) People will not kill each other in the name of blasphemy due to the change in mindset 4) minorities will be safe and prosper 5) shia and ahmedi mosques will not be bombed 6) Terrorism will decrease 7) Relationship with countries like India, Afghanistan, Iran will improve 8) trade with these countries will improve 9) when all the above happens, Pakistan won't have to spend on the military as much as it does 10) tourism will increase which will give a boost to the service sector. 11) International investments(dollars) will pour in if they get a safe environment(afterall Pakistan has the 5th largest population in the world) 12) new companies will set up in Pakistan bringing job opportunities and new technologies. 13) Pakistanis will have more Purchasing power and consumption. 14) Domestic industries will thrive with new entrepreneurs 15) This will bring more export opportunities. 16) Globally Pakistani image becomes better
@@fsu3328 Well of course secular countries need to have good economic policies to develop. USA and whole of Europe is secular. They are all developed. India is Secular and it is too developing. Pakistani society has become extremely religious. 90% of Pakistanis hate Hindus, they Hate Jews, they hate Christians, they hate Buddhists, they hate atheists. In fact they hate Shias, they hate Ahmedis. If your religion teaches to hate everyone, then of course we all will hate you back. You can’t develop or prosper when you don’t get along with anyone in the world.
They can't own non-M history of present day Pak territory but claim "civilization". Pak was formed when when person converted to Izlam after Qasim invaded Sindh in 712 but yeah we are "civilization". Can't make tv show on chanakya (but on Ottoman Ertugrul) but yeah "civilization". Claim Taj Mahal disown Ajanta Elora, Sanchi stupa but yeah "civilization". Fraud big0ts. Everything starts and ends with division between M and non-M.
@@MuhammadUmar-dx3el Abe bhootnik Hamare Ved -Puran- Bhagvad gita- Ramcharitamanas mein Bharat ka naam hai Aur uski boundary bhi batayi hai....hamare paas to poora proof hai.... Tum proof dikhao ki hazaaro saal pehle kis textbook mein pakistan ka naam hai...😂😂😂
In reality, I think there's a dire need of discovering a newer model of governance, where leaders of clergy and governance converge in the form of mutual dependence. There should be an elected council in my opinion that unanimously (not on majority) choses a leader and for rest of the matters the council either votes or determines if a population vote (direct democracy style) is required. Something along these lines could work in my opinion
You said that if someone suggests implementing an interest-free system, then you'd ask that whether he's considered how it will impact others and how it will be implemented? Well, the vision (or the last step) always gets recognised first, then the previous steps and the first step is thought at the end when planning any work.
After more then 75 years if you are still confused if Pakistan is to be secular or to Shriat Based county. Then it's mean you have been pranked by Your Creators in 1947 who didn't lay solid foundation for your future. Making a homogeneous lslamic nation and then thinking about secularism it's absurd and l am amazed at so called intellectual absurdity. Pakistan should be based on what the people believe
@@Fundamental_Islam. Why l have to do about it I not the one doing it. It's the government which should be concerned about that particular issue not me.
Golden era (Ummyyad Abbasid etc)of Islamic history was the fruit (result). We need to study the process how Muslims reached to that peak which starts from the time of struggle of Prophet Muhammad (SAW). So start from studying Seerah of Prohet Muhammad (SAW).
Bhai thy were Persians,now shia Iran..what has Pakistani Muslim got to do with Iranian history..they don’t even allow you to enter their country and you don’t even consider shia as Muslims..haha…just basking on borrowed laurels
Because Indians know about Reality about Muslims and Islam than countries like Japan, South Korea, Europe etc. why Europe is banning people from a Islamic countries
Bhai ye tum pakistan studies mein padhte ho ya islamiyat mein....???? Jb ek ghar mein har hafte ladai hoti hee hai toh itne crore logo mein ladai nhi hogi ??? Aur vo bhi 330 yrs ke liye
@@afrazamjad1644 😂😂 riot reported....?? Are you for real ? Report nhi hua toh crime hua hee nhi.... Imran khan ki FIR nhi huyi mtlb usko goli nhi lagi?? Wow... What a logic
@@Nitish.Singhal By saying reported I meant witnessed.... Historically the British with their Divide and Rule Policy introduced this seed in the subcontinent..... And BJP is successfully continuing the legacy
Hypocrisy is the enemy of humans. They don't do things sincerely. Islam ko sincerely follow kariye jaise Khulafa e Rashideen ke time pe common man se lekar Governors aur Khalifah khud follow karte they. This is the only solution. May Allah keep us sincere.
Islam and Muslims have never been moral nor ethical. They have been fighting and killing each other from the start. 3-0ut of the 4- Khulafa e Rashideen were murdered by.......Muslims. Islam is not a peaceful religion.
agar india anti minority hai to why christian , jews , parsi , jain , sikh ( baring khalistani ) , buddhist thrive in india , there is no hate against them . becz india is not anti minority it is anti islam . indian / hindu DNA is secular hence it is against any religion which says only our religion is right not yours. and from the mehargarh and indus valley civilisation hinduism started . hindu vedas were written on banks of sindh near rawalpindi . so own that too that you were hindu before but got converted due to brutal invasions. dont cherry pick history to suit islamic narrative.
Bro ye uska fixed opinion hai , he is a syed which means his ancestors are here from Saudi Arabia... He is taught and fed this from birth... How superior he and his family is ... So he has a highly biased view... Iske duniya Islam hee hai bas... Ye 99% islamic country mein paida hua hai isliye isko reality ka koi touch nhi hai.... His career aim in teenage years was to become a Moulvi.... And i am 100% sure he will become one soon 😂😂
Abe Bhai ye Syed kuch nahi hai , Inka proper genetic testing hua hai . The story is false. They don't have so called lineage . The probable theory is the first one who got converted during Islamic invasion or who got married/ra*ped had children converted to Islam and then started calling themselves Syed . The genetic study suggests same . As they have only small Arabic element in gene during invasion happened. Ye khudko kuch aur hi samajte Hai and ye bhai alag form me hote hai ki bhai hum Syed hai .
@@worldgeography2229 Bro khuch real bhi hote aur mostly nakli bhi... Lekin inki mentality same hoti hai... Which is superiorty complex.. Iska point of view aur tumhara point of view different hai , kyuki tumhare liye truth khuch aur hai aur iske liye khuch aur .... Usko apni baat kehne do Tum apni baat keh do.... Bus gaaliya avoid kro.... Gaali likhte hee tumhari shi baat bhi galat ban jayegi.... Tum iski soch ko comments se change nhi kr skte...bas criticise kr skte ho.... Pakistan mein iss time youth ka bura haal hai lakho bchhe islamic content ke naam British pakistani moulvi ke fans hai.... They have cult following 😂.... Aur inko sapne dikhake hai ticket bech dete hai .. Pakistan mein retirement profession is moulvi...😂😂 Kabhi kisi indian cricketer ko dekha hai jo pandit ban gya ho retirement ke baad Sab fraud mamla hai... Kisi celebrity ki video leak hojaye toh ldki hijab and burka and ldka moulvi with beard.... Inke liye islam escapism hai knowledge nhi ... India mein jitni bhi problems ho log masjid mein bomb toh nhi phodte.... Aur naa hee kbhi hoga... Kyuki jo Gaye ko roti khilate hai aur jo gaye ko roti ke sath khaate hai unme insaniyat ka farak hota hai....
@@nabanildas5819 😂 for you its waste , for me its taking and learning perspective from other side.... Agar mein ye video nhi dekhunga toh India successful ho jayega kya?
AOA Sir, Me Balochistan se or aap ki bat se muttafiq rkhta hn k Pakistan ko ek Nation state with official religion Islam hona chaiye or Pakistan me religion ko lany ka reason yhi tha k yha k different ethnicities ko ek Nation bnaya jaye. cultural values ko discourage kr k unko ek banner k nechy laya jaye which seems odd. because religion me different sects k waja se alag confusion hy. Islam is the complete code of life but in Pakistan Islam has never been practiced in true sense which begins with tolerance. Thank you.
Choose one : Want Pakistan to be Islamic or Want Pakistan to be peaceful and it's people to be happy no matter their religion. Islamic system is not the way to life if it was Afghanistan would be the most developed and happiest nation on earth.
its only been 2 years afghanistan has got independence and despite been sanctioned by whole world its is still in way better condition then secular liberal pakistan, afghanistan is competing with bangladesh and india meanwhile pakistan is competing with secular srilanka
@@user-yh1qd7lj5f LOL, better condition how ?? Don't make me laugh. Pakistan is a big country. But at least we don't have 109th hunger index like India. Also afghanistan is doomed no matter what. Afghanistan is the poorest country on earth last time I checked andhbkhakt.
Muzammil bhai once again you are speaking on things your don't understand. Please focus on the thing you were good at i.e. entrepreneurs, engineers etc. In the entire video you didn't speak of sovereignty. That's the first thing that should be discussed in this debate. You also did not talk about which type of secularism. Liberalism, Socialism or Fascism ? You are wrong about Indonesia. They have Sharia law for public Zina. 100 lashes. Go read about it. This happened in 2022. This video is embarrassing.
Indonesia as a whole is secular according to their constitution. Only one small province out of 38 has parts of Shariah law. All other provinces are fully secular. You’re accusing me of not knowing stuff while quoting half truths. The fact is both of us are on a journey of exploring ideas so it would be better if you would be a little more humble in your opinions. As far as the things I didn’t speak about, you are more than welcome to add to the discourse. Just because I didn’t add the things you want to hear doesn’t mean they don’t exist or I excluded them intentionally. There is only enough content I can fit into one video and therefore it is better to add anything you’d like to add with a bit more grace and respect. Regarding your mention of the types of secularism, where did you come up with those three types? While liberalism speaks about secularism, socialism is inherently about economic policy and has nothing to do with theological aspects of governance. Similarly, fascism is a far right ideology that has at many times included Christian nationalism. These are basic facts, you can Google them and read more about them and when you realize that you in fact did not know enough about the matter yourself, I hope you reflect on how embarrassing it is to accuse someone else of lack of knowledge when you are prone to making the same mistakes yourself. I am not trying to attack or belittle you, I was where you are once as well. So I hope you learn to approach discussions more respectfully. Trust me, it will give you a lot of joy and growth in life. I promise.
@@TBTGO Indonesian law is divided in 3. Civil, commercial and criminal. Outside of the "small" province of Aceh the civil law of Indonesia is Islamic. The commercial law also has Islamic laws in it. Who's speaking in half truths? Its not about what i want you to speak on. The whole idea of secularism and Islam rests on Sovereignty. It's the basic first principle. Secularism means keeping religion apart from the decisions you take. At the political level these three are the most recent the world has seen. Communism is a type of socialism that talks about how the state should be run after religion is kept apart. Fascism is about race. Aryan or Italian in their recent episodes. Christianity is used as one of the binding factors. But does not take away its secular nature. Most importantly Secular state is a part of secularism. Not the entirety of it. Please educate yourself on the above topics. It's easy to talk all arrogant and make rude comments while stating you aren't belittling me. I look forward to you acting on your own advice and admitting how little you know about this topic.
@@DWAGON1818I couldn't find those beautiful beautiful types of Secularism. Care to provide your source that backs up your claim and please no irrelevant article . Indonesia is also like Pakistan a confused state pretending to be religious but aren't.
Why Muzammil brother you open up a separate page or a group where everyone comes up on a certain topic to discuss the stuff. And you can provide a link to each of your video.
He wants attention from others for making his reaction videos to gain more subscribers on his channel by criticizing others, hence why there is so many of these bots you would see under many Pakistani RUclips channels
He has been doing a pretty effective job and to the grassroot level for what he thinks is right .one might not like him but undermining such a committed person is a mistake particularly for those who consider him as an opponent.
I would like to maintain a healthy debate over here. The reason why you are seeing many people asking Muzammil to do a Podcast with Qaiser Ahmed Raja is because of QAR being an educated person. His views might not be perfect for you but that doesn't change the fact that QAR has done a lot. He has made discourses much easier.
There is no golden period ..if you are talking about the Baghdad era then it would be better to to read the history after the radicals took power and burnt all the books ...
Pehli chiz sir ap jin Islamic nizam ki bt kr rhe hen wo aaenge to shayad zada acha nhi rhe Lekin zara Ap (swa) k nizam k according chala jay to sb acha hoga. Or second chiz thk bht se log is chiz k lie agree nhi honge qk logo ka lifestyle change hogaya ha ab bht Lekin ye bbi compulsory nhi k ya to islamic ho ha secular dono ko maintain barabar rkh kr bhi country chl skti ha or is trhn har chiz ma bht achi ho skti. But abbi hme sb se important apne education pr km krna ha or iska mtlb ue nhi nust literacy rate zada krna ha achi or equal education bhi compulsory ho. Or sb se pehle education system hi change ho jo chl rha ha ratta ratta usse bacho ko koi faida nhi hona just time or bacho ki ability zaya ho rhi ha.
😂😂😂 just based on beef bans in certain states, you can't compare secularism of India with Pakistan. I mean, I feel pity on people like you. They don't even bother reading about political framework or constitution at all. In India past 75 years, there were 2 Muslim Presidents, 4 Muslims education ministers, 2 R.A.W Chiefs, IB Chiefs ( equalant to your DGISI post), Muslims Election commissioner , 3 Muslims Chief Ministers give me one non-Muslims in pakistan during past 75 Years, Mr Muzzamil. So don't show your intellectual bankruptcy by comparing India and Pakistan just based on beef bans and unfortunate lynching incidents. In fact, during So called Fascist regime of Modi, IB ( intelligence Bureau), the chief was Muslim. I challenge you to make any non-Muslim person to your DGISI. You won't be able to do it in your lifetime.
Bat ya ha k Pakistan ka name srf "islami repulic " ha...islamic repulic system implement nhi hoa hmary mulk mn...agr islamic system implement ho tb sahi mano mn change dekhyyy ga.. Agr mn apna ak muslim name rakh loon r kam mary sary glt hn to mn muslman to nhi.....rayst e madina mn islamic nzam implement kea gea tbhi vo ak ideal society bnii..
Beautiful, Muzamil you've explained it very nicely & I agree with a lot of things & disagree with a few things as well. We have to admit that we're not living in an Islamic State (keeping in mind that it'll be dangerous as it'll disturb the majority of the nation) but we've to admit it so that we can change it after that. & Yes, Education & Commerce are a must, to go even a step further in achieving an Islamic State.
I personally believe that both the wings need to sit down together and formulate the necessities which both want. In Old islamic times, even at times of civil wars, armies used to unite against foreign invasions. So we should unite and see what both bring to the table.
@@QuickLit-0401 Ifwe admit that this is not islamic state then there will be adverse reaction by religious groups and will end up with ideologies of like of taliban and ISKP in society. And they will get sympathy and support by majority of people who would want "islamic system".
@@DanishAli-rm2ky I haven't seen a molvi yet who states that this is an islamic state. They themselves state that Rule of Law isn't being followed here. Before any step is taken, we must ensure that everyone has knowledge of the both sides, after that if they still state that Islamic system is necessary, than that's a different story. But Islamic, inherently isn't anything bad, it doesn't hinder progress of society in any sort of way, shape or form.
Muzammil, please define what you mean by Muslim Country. Is it a country where majority population is Muslim ? or where the Head of the State is a Muslim ? or where the Laws are Islamic ? please define these terms "Muslim Country" and "Islamic Country" that you have used so often in this video. Also before you define these terms do research and tell your audience... if Islaam allows Muslims to be divided by virtual borders on a map into countries.....
Sir Syed Ahmed was a misguided individual... Who thought Queen of England was a representative of God on earth ... And .. Muslims should help the colonial power in every way according to the wishes of Colonial masters.
Muzammil bhai, love your content, and i am learning from you a lot from this series "dill ki baat", Jazakallah khair. I may be wrong but what I perceived from your conversations on this series is that being spiritual is most prevalent part of Islam which i do not agree on, but today on your definition of Islamic system, I think I may be wrong on perceiving that about you. Apart from that, I believe that all aspects of life, such as science, philosophy, economics, social matters and most importantly politics can managed by Islamic system and with which can yield utmost benefits to nation and its people. Also when Sahil Adeem is coming to TBT Podcast muzammil bhai.
اچھا سیکیولر ریاست کی بات مان کر ہم اپنے ملک میں یہ نظام لے آتے ہیں۔ پھر آپ کے خیال میں اس نظام میں آپ مسجدوں کے ساتھ ساتھ چرچوں، مندروں، گردواروں کو قائم ہونے کی اجازت اور انکی تبلیغ کی اجازت دی جاۓ۔ تو پھر جو افراد غیر اسلامی ملکوں میں رو رہے ہیں کے ہمارے بچے دین سے دور ہو رہے ہیں وہی صورتحال ہمارے ملک میں بھی ہو جائے گی۔ اس کا کیا حل ہوگا پھر؟
Jo afrad ghair muslim mulkon me reh rahi hain apni marzi se reh rahay hain un ko yarghamal bana kar nahi rakha gaya hai. Agar unhay koi problem hai to wo apnay dar-ul-islam Islami mulkon me wapis ja saktay hain. Ghair muslim mulkon me musalmano ko islami mumalik se ziada mazhabi aazadi hai aur masajid madrassay bananay aur tableegh karnay ke poori aazadi hai.
Musalman mantay hain ke un ka mazhab sab se achcha hai to wo dosray mazahib ke Islami mulkon me tableegh se kiyon dartay hain. Jis ka maal achcha hota hai us ko 2 number ke maal se koi khatra nahi hota.
you are right that you dont have an agenda but people listen and follow you- subconsciously too. A famous saying with great power comes great responsibility. You just need to be responsible in what you say because it shapes the certain group of people
Hi muzamil bhai, I"m a student of IR, firsrly I appreciate your role in this intellectual renaissance, you can't imagine how much knowledge I have gained through your various series. May Allah bless you and give you more power. secondly, I completely agree to you that Pakistan should be an "Islamic socialist democratic republic" and governed by the core principles of Islam mentioned in the Quran and Sunnah. This should be done after thorough discussions on core topics through a structured system that ensures equal representation of all Islamic sects. Best Regards, Hafiz Rana M. Junaid Sabir
Zaidi sahab, everything I wanted to say after watching the last video and reading the comments, you covered really well in the first half of this one. Kudos and thank you! Regarding secular vs Islamic system, honestly it is a bit of a red herring. It is not a binary choice. If the majority of the population in a country is practicing Muslim, the country will inherently be Muslim in it's nature, because of the social mores informed by Islam. Even in a secular but representative system, legislation will reflect those social mores. In a secular system if the country decides they don't want riba, for whatever reson, they can work to solution for that if they so choose. Pakistan as a state with Islam as the state religion sounds great as a thought experiment, but in practical terms, it would take immense effort over years, intellegigent, committed and pragmatic leaders and buy-in from stakeholders across society and the political spectrum. It would also involve individual mullahs and the madrassas giving up their autonomy and authority to the state. Honestly, I don't see that happening barring some sort of miracle. The religious right when they speak of establishing a Muslim state, i dont think they mean that they will give up their authority to the state. Quite the opposite, I do believe they mean to be the power brokers if not the power holders in an absolute theocracy, and implementation of their personal interpretation of sharia. The ruhit comitte cant even agree on the moon sighting, when it should be a non issue and not a controversial matter every single time. We also have a council of Islamic ideology already, and their record has been ignoble more often than not, a disservice to country and religion. Yes, having a unifying sense of direction is important for nation building, but for Pakistan to succeed under any model of governance, stability and good governance, especially economic governance, is key. Whether that good governance is being delivered by mullah gov, wadera or secular goverment, without infringement of too many personal freedoms, in the end people wont care. Outcomes matter. In my opinion, the economic model / economic governance needs to be part of the conversation of the overall governance model. Even per Islamic tradition, Khalifa Umar would judge his governors not on how good a person /Muslim they were or how well people observed Islam under their rule. Instead their performance was judged on their practical performance and how successful and happy the people were in thier area. If the people were unhappy and public affairs had not been managed well, the governor was to be changed. There wasn't a religious police, and there wasn't a goverment mandated dress code and even the Khalifa applied common sense "spirit of the law" principle in changing circumstances rather than the letter of the law (he put in abeyance the Quranic punishment for theft when the circumstances warranted it, in the spirit of justice ". What we also know from the sunnah is that muslims are extolled in thier personal and state level decisions to confer with each other, discuss and develop a concensus or with the majority opinion. The stae is required to treat each citizen equally before the law, arab or non arab, Muslim or non Muslim and non Muslim subjects have the freedom to practice thier religion and manage their own affairs. All of the above together sounds very much like a representative democracy to me, with a lot of personal freedom, and government accountable to the governed.
Agar Allah ka hukum maanna faidai aur nuqsaan par dependent hai phir tou koi bhi Allah ki rah mai kabhi struggle na kerai. Woh jo Islam mai we hear and we obey ka concept hai, phir tou woh bhi applicable he na ho. Jab sood ko khatam karnai ka hukum aya tha tou us waqt bhi logoan ka us k saath rozgar laga hoowa tha. Agar yeh baat hoti k pehlai conditions saazgar ho jaiyn tou phir ham Allah ka hukum manain gai is logic k saath tou mecca sai madina bhi hijrat nahi honi chahiyay thi ya gazwa badar bhi nahi honi chahiyay thi kyun k haalaat sazgaar nahi thai. 75/76 saal sai ham yahi soch rahai hain k alternative koi way milai tou ham Allah ka hukum maanain. Say, [O Muhammad], "If your fathers, your sons, your brothers, your wives, your relatives, wealth which you have obtained, commerce wherein you fear decline, and dwellings with which you are pleased are more beloved to you than Allah and His Messenger and jihad in His cause, then wait until Allah executes His command. And Allah does not guide the defiantly disobedient people." (Quran 9:24)
Muzammil bhai we are students of IR in IIUI aur hamary group mein secular, Marxist, liberal as well as Believers and Islamist, Follwers of Javed Ahmed Ghamidi, Eng M. ali Mirza, And Dr Israr Ahmed aur hamari chai pe kia hi khobsorat aur intellectual discussion hoti hai aur iska maza hi kuch aur hai
IIUI?
@@manahil558islamabd islamic uni
I wish mery dost bhi political views pr baat krty aur mujhy enlighten krty knowledge sy
Konsa semester hy aur kha hoti hy discussion. I am software student
Harris real id se A
Sir, in a secular country everyone has the right to worship without any discrimination. Same applies to an Islamic country, anyone can worship according to their religion, and you cannot force anyone to except Islam or damage their books and places of worship or stop them for carrying out their religious activities. Our problem is that we (Muslims) have not even read our own book and followed maulvis, who failed to fulfil their purpose. Moreover, Islam presents us with the best political system. There was, is, and will never exit a model that is better than what Islam has presented.
we all know how much muslim respect it's minorities. And how much islamic Republic like Pakistan protect the non Muslims.
as a Muslim.. you feel bad when a person burn Qur'an but few months ago a hindu temple was demolished in Karachi Pakistan and a building complex is being made there.. hundreds of Christian home were destroyed ... I have seen Muslim in this comment section justify it why do you need temples in Pakistan..
In 2014 the organization, the All Pakistan Hindu Rights Movement (PHRM), published a survey report. The survey report found that 95% of the temples present in Pakistan since 1990 were destroyed or damaged. Out of the 428 places of worship, only 20 remained operational while 408 temples were converted either into commercial properties or into residential establishments. Out of the 20 temples, 11 were in Sindh, 4 in Punjab, 3 in Balochistan and 2 in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
Babri Masjid demolition in India only hastened the pace of temple demolition across Pakistan and Bangladesh. Around 1,000 temples were alone targeted or destroyed in Pakistan and 2014 PHRM survey findings continue to reflect in 2021 as well. From 20 operational temples in 2014, Pakistan now only has 13 temples managed by ETPB.
we all know the love what you give non Muslim specially Christian.. . In 1947 Muslims threatened Christians that Pakistan was made for Muslims only and that if Christians wanted to stay there, they had to live a life of servitude and perform sanitation work.. "Sewer Cleaners Wanted in Pakistan: Only Christians Need Apply." Remember this add by pakistani army in 2020. Guess nothing much change here..
Dear brother,
I have started reading the Quran in effort to learn about my religion as much as possible. After watching hundreds of thousands of Islamic videos and reading the Quran myself, I have not found a single Ayat/verse or a hadith which commands Muslims to demolish the places of worship of other religions. I have mentioned above that the problem with modern Muslims is that they are too much dependent on maulvis and do not make the effort to read the translation of the Quran themselves and try to understand what it says.
You know that (On the Day of Judgement) the Messenger, peace be upon him, will say: "My Lord, my people had abandoned this Qur’an." Surah: 25, Verse: 30.
During the time of Caliph 'Umar certain Muslims had taken a piece of land belonging to a Jew. They constructed a mosque on it. 'Umar ordered the demolition of the mosque and the restoration of the land to the Jew. This event shows that I cannot take anyone land forcefully. The problem is that most of the Muslims are not even aware of this event, sad.
I am really sorry for whatever Muslims have done with the minorities in Pakistan or anywhere in the world. It is always hard to see videos of Muslim/Muslims treating non-Muslims horribly or reading comments containing the stories of non-Muslims suffered at the hand of Muslims. After seeing such videos, I am 110% certain that these people have not read a single a page of the Quran with translation and barely open the Quran for recitation.
Lastly, religious extremism does not exist amongst Muslims in Pakistan because it is a part of Islam, and this is what Islam teaches. No, they all have to deal with a lot of problems while living in Pakistan that their minds do not function as of those living in developed countries like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, USA, etc etc.
@@On.007 well I have read my bible and it has a very good passage.. 'do unto others what you want others to do unto you '
well it's hilarious when we see muslim pointing out isreal about the killing and Palestine or even Rohingaya or kashmir .. While the same won't say a word about the virtual annihilation by killing forced migration of non Muslim community in islamic country. Where the native population is refused to below 5% in some places below 1% like afghanistan Pakistan Indonesia even all meddle east. Jews in Muslim countries are in 3/4 digit..
If you want respect the respect others , the reality is Muslim treat its minorities like shit.. and they are real xenophobe.. and it's not just limited to specific country
The Taliban destroyed the tallest buddist didnt they..
Turkey convert hayia Sofia into a mosque again.. over 100 Christian churches have been converted to mosque just in turkey.. do you want me to give you the list..
Pakistan and Bangladesh has destroyed more than 1000 small and big temples.. churches
Have you ever asked why are the population of 56 Muslim countries, 39 have 88%+ Muslim population, of which 31 islamic majority country have 95%+ muslim population..
Why is it that it is impossible for non Muslim to live in these islamic country.. The Persian left for india..
The Afghanistan lost it Buddhist monastery
But how many islamic country condemn the virtual inhalation of sikh from afghanistan who were 6 mn in '71 .. And less than 100 left today.. Or the forced conversion and marriage of hindu and Christian under age girls in Pakistan.. The inhalation of Ahemidia in Pakistan Indonesia and kurdistani mens and thier girls turkey syria Iraq Iran.
Kurds have had a long history of discrimination perpetrated against them by the Turkish government. Massacres have periodically occurred against the Kurds since the establishment of the Republic of Turkey in 1923.
you feel the pain when you are in minority.. And demand equal rights and secularism.. But won't give it to non Muslim minority in Islamic countries.. even under shariya law as per dhimini in pact of umar..
You demand that you guys should be respected but where is the same respect when you distroy temples and churches and gurdwara and buddist sites..
You want others to not mix religion and politics.. but killed thousands in blaplhamy laws...
Muhammed.. Dint he destroyed temples of hubal in mecca after war of bidr..
If Muhammed didn't respect others feeling why should we care about your..
Your muslim rulers and scholars have burnt libraries of ancient knowledge.. Your violent mob did it again last month ago in France.. And you are hurt by just one..
When gajnavi came to destroy somnaath he could have stopped by just looting the temple . As requested by the pundits.. But he didn't wanted to be just a looter he wanted to be an idol destroyer .. And you guys consider him your hero..
So if you guys didn't respect us why do you expect respect from us..
Islamic law in quran can never be apolitical or secular.. Because quranshreef isn't secular.. It give second class treatment for non Muslim
the overall attitude of islamic world.. That's hypocrisy of islamic world don't you feel
I'm sorry I still have not heard a single word of condemnation from any muslim..
May be they are afraid to be called khafir because they went against islamic ummah
@@On.007 gusse you didn't read the part where the temple of hubal and the 360 statues were destroyed to make mosque of Mecca madina
@@On.007I don't blame Muslims for the hate .. as individuals they are great..
But face it the teaching of islam.. give you a superiority complex over non Muslim.. hence you essentially don't find it odd or disgusting how non Muslim minorities are treated in Muslim countries..
how you can say that pakistan is secular . Non muslim cannot become the PM ?. No government fund to make minorirties worship place ? .Overal whole educational system is just islam . in english hazrat muhammad chapter. in urdu same. in islamiyat same. after imran khan faheem ul quran and diff other courses .
Because the Pakistani public actually don't know what secularism means
@@rohand04Sahi kaha
no non muslim can become pm of pakistan for your kind information even a muslim cannot become pm of pakistan, only pup-pet suggested by usa can become pm of pakistan, second point, Pkaistan goverment has also never funded any constructon of mosque and your expect them to make temples in pakistan? educational system is islam? are you being sarcastic? then why is universities of pakiistan have become a hub of zina? only fedral school system have a bit of islamic education and even that is thanks to our ulama who worked hard to establish islamic education in schools, private colleges and universities dont even know i or islam, from the day 1 of creation of pakistan till now liberal elites and industrialists are ruling this country and you think pakistan is islamic country
Why should government make non Muslim worship place do non Muslim countries make Muslim worship places?? When was the last time UK, USA, Australia Germany France head of state a Muslim?
@@redpanther9380 exactly
I just can't emphaisis how amazing this series is,getting to know soo much about the topics that have never been talked about.and taught in schools.Getting my actual schooling here.Jazakallah muzamil bhai
As a Pakistani Christian now Living in a secular state has granted me a sense of freedom and diversity that I cherish. It saddens me that educated individuals like Muzammil advocate for Pakistan to be an Islamic country, especially when they have had the opportunity to witness the progressiveness of secular nations.
Just for constructive discussion, What exactly bother you when you hear about Pakistan as an Islamic State. Or what are the thought that make you sad about it?
@@farhanaziz1177 Secularism fosters a more just, tolerant, and prosperous society, where the government serves all citizens impartially and focuses on common national goals rather than divisive religious agenda. minorities face significant legal and societal barriers. in Pakistan, we have Blasphemy laws (Sections 295, 298) that lead to violence and imprisonment. Anti-Ahmadiyya laws (Ordinance XX) restrict Ahmadis' religious freedom. Forced conversions affect minorities, especially women. Constitutional Article 41(2) limits non-Muslims from top leadership. Reserved seats offer limited political representation. Oath requirements exclude non-Muslim officials. Islamic Ideology Council influences laws, while Hudood ordinances and Islamic family laws disadvantage minorities.
Ground level is even more worse. Mashal Khan lynching in Mardan (2017), the Ghotki riots (2019), the attack on the Ahmadiyya community in Gujranwala (2014), the assault on Sikh Gurdwara in Peshawar (2020), Kasur mob lynching (2017), Karachi Hindu temple attack (2021), Chakwal Ahmadiyya mosque assault (2012), Rahim Yar Khan Hindu temple vandalism (2021), Rawalpindi Ahmadiyya community attack (2014), Gojra riots (2009), Sialkot lynching of Sri Lankan national (2021), and Swat mob incident (2024). these are common people taking selfies while mob lynching.
Ground level is even more worse. Mashal Khan lynching in Mardan (2017), the Ghotki riots (2019), the attack on the Ahmadiyya community in Gujranwala (2014), the assault on Sikh Gurdwara in Peshawar (2020), Kasur mob lynching (2017), Karachi Hindu temple attack (2021), Chakwal Ahmadiyya mosque assault (2012), Rahim Yar Khan Hindu temple vandalism (2021), Rawalpindi Ahmadiyya community attack (2014), Gojra riots (2009), Sialkot lynching of Sri Lankan national (2021), and Swat mob incident (2024). these are common people taking selfies while mob lynching
As a minority in Pakistan, we feel profound pain, hopelessness, and a sense of inferiority. We harbor deep anger and resentment towards those who defend this Islamic system like muzammil which perpetuates our suffering and denies us basic rights and dignity.
Unbiased Suggestion:
You should consider inviting Khalid Mahmood Abbasi to your podcast to discuss the topic of the country's system with him. He is a prominent Islamic scholar who also has a deep understanding of the secular system, so I believe this conversation will be incredibly insightful.
i also want Khalid sahb on your podcast
Yup 👍😊
+1
Same...
Bilkul
Hi Muzamill Hassan,
It's a humble request: please make one podcast with Qaiser Ahmad Raja on the Islamic System.
Jazakallah
@shazilwaqar i agree
The person that supports child Rapes
Highly Recommend
Must do please
We agree with your opinion, Muzamill Hassan. May Allah give you more knowledge and bless you with barakah.
Yes , aside of the fact that he's implying that Malaysia or UAE are true islamic ( or closer to that) country Which isn't the case really. We need to call spade a spade,I have tons of respect for muzammil but we can't say those countries represent true islamic system because they show diversity very well and economically better etc etc. many things which are happening in UAE are very very unslamic. Islam doesn't allow that. Islam is progressive in different sense but it's not in the way we think about the term ' progressive ' - which allows everything and total freedom. Nah , allowing everything ( like UAE does in the name of entertainment) is counter productive and create problems. Islam doesn't want unnecessary problems to be created. So there are clear dos and don'ts in islamic system which we can't dismiss. Infact we should embrace that aspect of true islamic system
@@goals27 You're Right Bro
@@shazilwaqar Thanks
Why non Muslim have to pay tax(jaziya) in Islamic country? Should muslim have to pay tax in non Muslim country?
Hi brother how are u I hope your fine . Non Muslim pay jizya because for there protection and other things like business tax and other things etc . Muslim pay tax in non Muslim country that's not jizya because jiyz is only taken in Muslim countries
@@Mr-HALAL-OFFICIALProtection from whom? Sir! And tax may should be paid just like muslim pay road tax, Income tax, house tax, GST etc . why a person pay tax because he is not muslim?
@@Ilhank8 Muslim also pay Zakat and it is not taken from non-muslim
They don't have to pay jiziya. When itmam e hujjat was completed and the truth was made clear to the people to the last degree, the disbelievers, who persisted in rebellion, were sentenced to death.
But ehl e kitab (Jews and Christians), who were not rebellious, rather they persisted to claim that they only believed in one God, and did not consider themselves polytheists were given this option to pay jiziya.
This was a matter of that time only. Nabi Pak PBUH k baad yeh kaam baad k anay walay insano ko krnay ki koi hedayt nhi di gaii.
Pakistan mei to wese hi non Muslim sai jizya Lena bnta hi NHI Islam ki roo se bhi dekhein kyunke Pakistan koi aisa mulk nhi hai Jo musalmanon ne koi non Muslims SE Jang krke hasil Kiya bhai😅😅
If Pakistan should be an Islamic state then there should be no problem with india being Hindutva state and all the West should recline to Christianity. That would be great idea, isn't?
And please also do a podcast with Sahil Adeem on speed of light and sound because he has a "Dil ki baat " on speed of sound. It will help Pakistan a lot.
why is Israel a jewish state then??
@@muhammadtallal3104 What have been sizzling there for months now because of their ideology?
@@hamzashah4779 its been sizzling for more than 75 years. What's your point?
@@muhammadtallal3104 Yep, but it intensified in last few months. Crux of the matter is that they have been in war for just a piece of land which they consider holy as per their perspective. There are obviously political issues underpinning this but it's actually Israel's ideological narrative which is the cause of fire. And it's fanned by Hamas time and again.
What's the problem with that? Do you think Western countries don't recognise themselves as having Christian heritage? Do you think Christian values don't shape the values of European societies? India is a Hindutva state and under the right wing they've made the most military, economic and political progress. They religious right wing of India has overlooked huge success. Should you discount their success from their ideology? If so then why connect out failure to our ideology or lack of?
For me personally, understanding of islamic state and islamic system made lot easier by syed Abul Aala modudi.
Firstly appreciated Muzamil on this great intiative of intellectual topics.
When we discuss about islamic system on state level it's not about sects it's more about principles. My understanding it's not about sunni, shia, brelvi, deobandi or ahl e hadees, its more about islamic education system, it's about interest free banking system it's about islamic social system etc. when you set these basic principles on state level you won't have troubles in sect. And all sect are agreed on basic principles just like federal shariat court on interest free banking.
Some books of Syed abul aala modudi on this topics.
1. Tankeehat
2. Islami nizam e Zindagi aur is k bunyadi tasawaurat
3. Islami hakoomat kis tarhan qaim hoti hai
4. Islami riyasat
Zakat k system par aaj tak consensus nahi hoa. Triple talaq ya khula pr hr firqa apna fatwa deta ha jab k ye court aur state ki authority ha k wo kya qanon implement kry aur kya judgment dy.
Wirasat k mamly ma log apna firqa badal lety ha. Democracy ko mazhabi tabqa shirk kahta ha.
Ab pichay sood ko on principle khatm krny ka irada ha lekin koi alternative nahi dya gya system ko.
Mujy nahi samj aati wo konsy principles hy jis pr tmam firqo ka itefaq ha aur shariat k ein mutabiq ha.
@DanishAli-rm2ky You are talking childishly that if we take any initiative, there will be disagreement among people, wherever there are people, there will be disagreement, it is not surprising.
All sects of Pakistan have given 22 points to the government to implement the Islamic system. On which all sects of Pakistan agree. What is the excuse after that?
(If you want 22 points, I will paste them here.)
These questions arise on secularism if we bring secularism to Pakistan, which one should we take? We know that, wherever secularism has been imposed on the people, it has been enforced through bloodshed, so do you want bloodshed in Pakistan?
secularism comes in various forms and interpretations shaped by historical, cultural, and political contexts. How will you decide and get people to agree on what kind of secularism we want? It is a separate matter that the majority of Pakistan does not want this.
Great. And even if disagreement arises it can be solved and common ground can be found in majority of issues with discussions and debates and if not majority can decide. So some people making It look like it's not possible and because they don't want to discuss about islamic system or want its implementation they keep repeating that line ' oh whose version will be, there will be disagreements and problems '... As if problems don't occur otherwise and debates don't happen in other systems.
@@mrmuhammad11 Can you please give a link to the 22 points?
@@mrmuhammad11today millions of Pakistanis themselves run to live in secular countries..barring Afghanistan no Muslim country has implemented full sharia,even Saudi Arabia which gave Islam to the world has 5% atheists and 19% non religious people according to Gallup survey..educated Muslim countries tend to become secular while uneducated lean towards sharia…look at the plight of women in Afghanistan and Iran…
*17:18** bharat me minority itne khatre me h ki inki abadi lagatar badh rahi h, wahi Pakistan me minority itni safe h ki inki abadi lagatar kam ho Rahi h 😂 dono ko compare mat Karo Bhai, hindu to hamesha hi non Hindus ko kafir bolta h or Muslim to non Muslim ka bahut hi samman karta h* 😂😂😂
27:35 But we have 22 points of Ulama on which scholars from all the sects were agreed upon as the main points of Shariah Law that should be implemented on the state
Muzammil, this is a very logical and excellent analysis. I agree that Pakistan should be an Islamic state where the system is based solely on the laws of Allah, and minorities are given complete rights. As for the practicality and differences among sects, no sect opposes the idea of an Islamic system, the elimination of interest (riba), or the punishment for rapes. These are some basic fundamentals on which everyone agrees. Islam provides comprehensive practical implications that will never become obsolete. For example, the Islamic economic system does not seek to abolish private property, as was done by communism, nor does it prevent individuals from serving their self-interest. Instead, it tries to promote human brotherhood, socio-economic justice, and the well-being of all through an integrated role of moral values, market mechanisms, families, society, and good governance.
Additionally, I believe we need an intellectual revival. For this, we will need to establish around 100 institutions similar to Bayt al-Hikmah from the Islamic Golden Age. This revival will encompass science, technology, and our mindset.
This is a step towards a new age of discourse, and together, we can be the ones to initiate it.
Yes sir but everyone is following the same Quran and Sunnah. And in an "Islamic state" it is very bland to say k Quran ka nizam lain. But which version? That is the biggest issue in such a system.
@@MrAhmed-dx5hwWhich version, what does it mean? Lol. Islam is the one, there is no version of Islam, there is only one Qur'an, only one Sunnah.
This question arises on secularism that if we want to bring secularism, which one should we bring?
Secularism is an ambiguous concept that can refer to many ideas and policies.
💯. Beautiful written. Thanks for writing this comment.
One thing I would like to add is even though islam doesn't stop individuals growth in anyway, it emphasis and encourage collective growth of the society and Muslims. If in any instance, supposedly there is a situation which becomes like individual growth of one person Vs collective benefit , islamic system will decide in favour of collective benefit everyday. And that individual person might feel hard done by he has to let go of his immense growth for the sake all Muslims around him and Deen itself says He will be rewarded tremendously at the end so even he's not in loss and that's the beauty of islam
@@MrAhmed-dx5hw bro, sorry but that repeated argument doesn't wash anymore ' whose version it will be' - if anyone do his study and research he will know that majority of what contains islamic system doesn't have any disagreement of any sect. Some issues of disagreement can be decided with discussions among scholars and if still few remain, majority can set the rules without being too harsh on a minority. You can't use this argument to pretend islamic system isn't applicable in Pakistan or in any other place, we all know in secular system majority of the times majority choose and minority have to accept that and nobody has a problem with that but as soon as islamic system is discussed you start to have a problem with ' versions' and 'majority/minority ' issues . Don't do insincere arguments.
Muzamil please do a podcast with Qaisar Ahmad Raja. Mainly on this topic. Must do ❤
Are you a fan of Qaiser Ahmed Raja?
takeh for chutyapay ka islam bechee subko?
Yes him and raja Zia as well
Bhai tu raja ruje jaise neempagal ko sun k pagal ho chuka h.
@@sk-to5gk tum ne jiski dp.lagayi ha us SE pata chal rha h kon h pgl
The main problem with our Islamic system is that we do claim that we're an Islamic state but generally speaking it doesn't seem to be.I would say,in my opinion, studying religion is very very important for that not just practicing everything that's been going on throughout the history in our mosques and schools,do research on your own, re understand religion for that.
Sovereignty belongs to Allah alone. Anyone disagreeing, bring it on.
Pakistan ka matlab kya ? La ilaha illallah
I Agree with You, Only Sharia Law for Pakistan ☪
@@NeutralJaanwar-cb4tn Yes, then pakistan will become next afghanistan. Please let us minorities live in Peace.
@@NeutralJaanwar-cb4tn Religious freedom is one of the basic rights of a human being.
@@bobbyeditz765I am sunni Muslim and I feel you are right, it is better for Pakistan to be secular than to be a theocracy where the rulers would even use our religion to control people , it will hurt Islam in the long learn and there is a very good chance it will make people hate religion altogether
Is ka matlab kya hae asaan zuban mein btao..ye naara to bht acha hae lekin is ki state level pe implementation kya hae according to your understanding
Mashallah what a comprehensive analysis put together by you Muzammil! Agreed totally to majority of your opinions with an exception to a few ( i promise only a few 😂).
Islam as a state religion can not only solve all of the problems Pakistan is going through currently but shall also pave the way for it to be a model islamic country for the Ummah. A Theocratic state somehow also seems possible to me when majority of the Ulma can agree on basics, principalities and core values and leave the nitty gritties for the people to decide and act upon by making them capable enough through a systematic educational and intellectual change.
And yes Economics and Knowledge are the only way forward for this country.
Very enthusiastic and excited to see you have an intellectual discourse of this type with Sahil Adeem Bhai and Qaisar Ahmed Raja. Itll be a delight to these sore eyes. Please please a humble request 🥺
If Islam cannot solve the problems then can secularism solve all of them? If not then why did he mention only Islam as being unable to do so?
Whoever supporting islamic state of Pakistan i hope they will also support a hindu state of India and Han Chinese state and Jewish state of Israel ( a considerable population of israel is muslims )
I will support Hindu state of India and Jewish state of Israel if they are coming from majority of people and shouldn't percecutue any minority or innocent
We want our secular Pakistan and we hope every country is secular India,china,Russia, Brazil i mean every country on Earth
Religious freedom is one of the basic rights of a human being. These Islamists will never understand this. I am a christian in Pakistan and I am disgusted by what the country has become and what the people think of other minorities. I just want to escape.
@@bobbyeditz765I even though being a Muslim in Pakistan, feel the same way about these islamists and the extremism most of them end up promoting
There is a word called democracy if you ever heard, if majority of people voted in favor of a secular system in their countries, why would anyone have any problem with them and besides Islam ke ilawa dosre mazahib ka koi administrative system hai hi nahi bas ibadat han
State should not give patronage to any religion bcz in a state there live many people who profess different types of faith and religion... Religion is a personal matter and no one should impose particular faith over others.. Secular .
Why don't you leave Pakistan how can Pakistan be secular it cannot be....you want LGBT
We don’t want elites making moral rules for us
islamic republic you maderchudchiya if you want Secularism go to Canada
Bro I get your concern. But see, the difference is that Islam is not like any other Religion.
Islam is fundamentally considerate of Other religions. It is forbidden for a Muslim government to disturb or destroy the Religion and Religious symbols of other religions.
See examples of Hazrat Umar rebuilding the Temple Mount worship place for Jews. Salahuddin ayubbi allowing Christians to live peacefully after conquering Jerusalem.
And much more.
The problem here is that some people claim to be Muslims but they don't follow rules of Islam. They are Hypocritical and are calling for Allahs wrath.
@@fsu3328brother I get your concern but don't put allegations like that without first knowing full
Awesome MashAllah, So true- An Islamic System needs to be robust and flexible enough with each era that it readily caters all needs of Muslims at local and global level. Stagnation of islamic thought is the reason of Muslim ummah's decline. We try finding old solutions for new problems! We cannot just look back and find all solutions, new models (economic, educational, political etc) need to be devised on islamic principles, not old methodologies. Elements of islamic system need to be selected from all ideologies of past and present, those elements which conform with deen ul islam principles, e.g. we cannot shun socialism altogether as you described coz Islamic state ought to be a welfare state and much more inshaaAllah, such a great effort!
A short answer to secularists, Pakistan will never be a secular state, try to make it secular as much as you like. Go on....
In which hole you are living brother, Pakistan is already a secular state. But people of Pakistan don't have secular values, nor Islamic😀...but as far as state is concerned it is a distorted version of secularism where no morals exist and corruption is a norm. Your short answer to seculars is not making any sense. You should thrive to make Pakistan an Islamic State and first step would be admitting its not Islamic
Pakistan was created secular, is secular unofficially and will 100% become secular in the future. Cry in denial 😂😂
Sindh will always be secular. Proud to Sindhi.
That means Pakistan would neber become prosperous
@TabraizBajkani how Sindh will be Secular ?
Is Sindh was Secular why did you guy throw out your own Sindhi Hindu during 1947 ?
Why small Hindus girl are being force converted in Sindh ?
A podcast with Qaiser Ahmad Raja And Sahil Adeem on Islamic System
the've already done, they are not qualified to create a system, just two people can't decide a nation's future. there should be more than that.
Wo donou 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
@@qadeerabfilms yes two people can't decide nation's future. But those two people have right to present their system.
Podcast with a monkey?
@@atifhameed-ic9hk as i said they already shared there views on eon podcast, you can check it out, that;s not the ultimate system we want, sahil adeem wants jung and Qaisar ahmad raja focused on madrassa
You should do a portcast with Khalid Mehmood Abbasi or Qaiser Ahmed Raja
Both are monkeys
Podcast with🐒?
To understand the Islamic system, you should invite Qaisar ahmed Raja on your podcast, he can give you a clear explanation about it and also inform you about its implementation.
Abe ja bhai
Jaa dafa ho
Qaiser Ahmed Raja is a fraud
Invite monkeys on podcast with humans?
Bhai if qaisar can explain then you as a follower can also explain. For example Please brief us about the process of electing the Ruler according to sharia.
There should be no discussion between islamic OR secular… There should be a discussion HOW TO IMPLEMENT ISLAMIC SYSTEM!
What is Islamic system?
Haha ya bhi sahi hai...
Just for these politicians and such to use islam as a tool to stay in power as usual
Sahi bat he hum agar apne app ko musalman kehte hain to phir islam ke mudabiq he sab kuch karna chahye. Lekin narrow minded hone ke be apne nuksan hain.
@@ikhlaquechan7463 you want me to answer this question in comments? Instead of asking me, if you are serious about this question, then learn about it!
Lynching does not make a country religious.... Its your constitution that matters ..... Indian constitution does not follow any religion, only people follow religion.... While on the other hand Pakistani people follow religion and also Pakistan's constitution follows Islamic principles so India is sceular by constitution and Pakistan is Islamic by constitution..... Whether you believe believe it or not but even a single sentence in your constitution which gives priority to a particular religion can never be Secular.... Pakistan is not secular whether you believe it or not... And India is 100% secular whether you believe it or not..... Not a single sentence in our constitution gives priority to a particular religion..... Muslim can become PM of India according to Constitution while Non Muslim can not become PM of Pakistan by Pakistani constitution says everything about Non secular Pakistan.....
why you are interested in becoming a pm of pakistan there are post of governor cm, minister mayour post
@@masroorkhalil9655lol, you still can't hide the fact that pak is a biased state
@@masroorkhalil9655Why? A Pakistani citizen should have right to be a president irrespective of religion! That's why Islam can never be secular, Islam in itself is communal.
@masroorkhalil9655 Why he shouldn't be interested in PM?
@@mpqw
because it is a biggest responsibility and culture and public representation
First see the shape of economy of turkey and inflation which is more than 55% Malaysia was never an Islamic country it became recently because the overbreeding problem muslims have and slowly becoming radical, same with Indonesia.
True
Muzamil, you are doing a wonderful job of bridging the gaps between people having different POVs
Keep up the good work 🙌
From last 1400, thousands of Islamic Scholars wrote multiple Hadiths, Tafasirs, translations and interpretations to understands One Books, but still fail to understand. Doubts and Confusions are growing day by day. This is happening bcz that book is vague, outdated and impractical.
Every Scholar has its own interpretations and consider other as Kaffir, Gumrah, Jahannami. Thats why many Firqas came out over the period of time.
Thats why Adam Seeker, Zafar Heretics like people becoming popular in youth in Pakistan. Kfss
LoL Believers are happy and content with their Lord. Alhamdulillah! Only hypocrites get doubt in their faith due to their sins.
Awaz e haq official🗿mufti yasir nadeem al wajidi🗿Qesar Ahmed raja🗿 enters the chat
ly lundpujari lindus: "noooo saaaar plij no saaaar😭🙏🏾🚩"
30:00 will Muslim minorities be ok if a non Muslim countries imposs zazia tax on them..
Yes! Jizya tax is far more humane than todays modern tax on literally everything. It is only one time per annum and excludes women, children, sick, poor and elderly
Yes
@@Fundamental_Islam.😂😂😂 So essentially it is a protection tax..
Morden tax is not for protection but for resources.. it equal to all
No will Muslims be ok to be discriminated against based on their religion and call it Islamophobia.. but are ok when they do it
7:28 Muzamil Bhai Did you know that Pakistan's constitution and laws restrict non-Muslims from holding high-level positions in government and state institutions?
Articles 2, 41, 91, and 260 enshrine Islam as the state religion, requiring key officials to be Muslim. Discriminatory laws and social biases further marginalize non-Muslim communities, limiting their representation and opportunities. Unfortunately, these barriers make it challenging for Pakistan to become a secular country, perpetuating inequality and exclusion. So how you can say's that Pakistan is actually a secular country????
Pakistan is not a secular country. It isn't an Islamic country either.
The reason why non-Muslims can't hold positions of policy making is because the policies of Pakistan have to made according to the Quran and Sunnah. Will they rule through Quran and Sunnah. Its like in a liberal country a communist cannot come into power as they have a different worldview.
A Pakistani could never understand Indian secularism and Pakistani secularism because the majority of the people in Pakistan are Muslims and Majority of Indians are Hindus..... Islam has rules written in Quran and if the majority of people follow that religion then it automatically becomes a Non secular state because majority of the people are Non secular... While in the case of India, Hinduism is not a rules based religion, no rules are written for Hindus to be followed, so if a country has Hinduism in majority then it can never be a religious country..... India is proper secular because majority people don't use a religion based on a book while Pakistan may not be a proper Islamic country but the fact is majority of the people follow a religion with a preset idea of religion so Pakistan can never be Secular like Hindus ...... Muzammil should come to India and see for himself what real Secularism looks like..... Just saying India is following Hindu ideology can never make India a religious country.... India ko samajna ek Muslim Pakistani k liye namumkin hai.....
The same is with india. Would you indians allow a muslim to be your prime minister?
@@mahmad8528 well our constitution does not say a Muslim can not become India's PM. While Pakistan's constitution says Non Muslim can not be Pakistan's PM. Constitution gives right to a citizen and our constitution is secular while Pakistan's Constitution is not secular......
@@wish-ld9te With population of 80% hindus how do you expect a muslim to be the PM. There is really no need for it to be in the constitution.
Woah, this video actually gave me a new perspective on this topic. Excellent video Muzamil bhai.
Also, I highly recommend everyone to read "Islam and Politics" by mufti Taqi Usmani.
I will read
Very beautifully presented. Easy to absorb even for the layman.
No matter what our stances are, it is important to be able to realize the realities around the world. This comes when we expose ourselves to other societies/economies/countries. Travelling, reading, following a diverse range of people on your social media, watching content of diverse people, etc, this is what helps in increasing your critical thinking and getting out of the bubble of "i know everything".
Kudos to you for creating an environment where you engage in and encourage 'parhi likhi baatein'.
May Allah keep us guided in the right path.
Thanks for initiating the discussion muzammil. I am an agnostic atheist and these following are my concerns/fears from a future Islamic republic:
What would be the punishment of blasphemy?
Would i be allowed to change my religion in official documents to no religion?
Would there be apostate punishment?
Would i be allowed to buy and drink alcohol?
What would be the punishment of eating publicly in ramzan?
Can a I as non Muslim be a prime minister?
Would government demand me paying jazya i.e extra tax for my safety as non muslim?
I am a christian. Forget all other points. Just being able to work at higher positions at government level would be enough of a right for non muslims. But unfortunately these radical islamist will never let that happen. Pakistan should never become an islamic state or we will see the next afghanistan.
You’re doing a good job. We all need to educate ourselves and take interest in such discussions that will ultimately generate a true value system with calm, intellectual, educated and smart individuals.
Thank you !
As usual, amazing content with respected delivery to the audience. I think we need more discussions of the sort, to sit across a table and decide our way of direction. Mixing dairh rupay ki secularism and Islamisation is bringing everything but progress. I too agree that after the 2020s, a sense of intellectual renaissance is slowly unfolding in Pakistan now, rising steadily in the upcoming days
2.4 million Pakistani Muslims have quit Islam and become atheists according to columnist Mr Orya Maqbool Jan…
As you described, why islamic system is good for us, please invite someone who can deliberately explain Islamic System and it's benefits, I encourage you to invite Saahil Adeem. Both of you guys can actually brainstorm, and present exact Islamic system in details, or for the matter of fact, the audience would know why islam!
Riyasat e Madina ka manjan Mr Imran khan ne he baicha tha....
Pakistan ka matlab kya ? La ilaha illallah
Only Sharia Law for Pakistan ☪
Dude why most shias are secular????? It even goes against your fundamental beliefs .
Riysasat e Medina Kehna behtr hai bajaye secular Ka manjan baichna west, India ya certain element KO Khush krne k.lye.
And I am not a supporter of Imran khan or PTI - a party jokers from top to bottom.
Yeh konsi rayasat e madina the jahan nach gana sab horha tha ?? Mazhab k naam pe pagal banana humare syasat dano ka mashghala raha hai.. Imran khan shb bhe koe dodh k dhulay nhe !!
Puri qoum ko 2 manjan bechay ek rayasat e madina ka aur ek Ertugrul 😂
Khud sahab zaday establishment ki paidawar hen aur qoum ko haq aur batil sikha rhy hen lol...
Koe bataega T.L.P kis ne launch ki the ? Tha na mazhab ka manjan ?
@@NeutralJaanwar-cb4tn hilarious isn't it you fear or hate Modi BJP for Hindu rastra...😂😂😂
Dear Muzamil, Dont pay heed towards negative people and negative comments..Your thoughts are pragmatic, and useful for all pakistanis..we can see the sincerity behind those sentences..Please keep sharing your ideas cause your opinion is relatable and it really matters🤍
I agree with you, we need to have a proper societal and economic structure in place and act upon it for a certain period of time before we can move on to the discussions like secularism vs islamic laws, since that is not the biggest problem right now and will have no inpact if either of the system if fully or partially implemented. I think that we need to solve our core issues at state level which is economy and at societal level which is education so that an educated population which is relatively well off can then take part in the discussions like these to create a proper, permanent framework of the society and the state.
if "proper societal and economic structure" fix our problems like economics and education why we need a new system
@@atifhameed-ic9hk Yes, but the implementation of a new system starts from somewhere, it is an intricate process that is done carefully, step by step through proper planning. And for that to happen, the society needs to be relatively at peace, which happens if people are a bit well off economically and that obviously happens if you have skills which are gained through education.
@@AbdulaImran dear, To move forward, we need to define our direction by creating a new system. This will clarify our identity as an Islamic state or a secular one. The starting point of the system will shape our future and help us address core issues effectively. It will guide economic and educational. By establishing a clear system, we build a prosperous, cohesive society.
@@atifhameed-ic9hk I absolutely agree on the new system thing, obviously this system has absolutely failed and that's why there is even a need for a new system. But to create a new system, we must have a starting point, which we have to find from the existing system, since we can't create a new system out of nothingness, we first need to identify what sort of issues there are in our existing system before we define something new, since the new system needs to exist for upcoming years rather than being a temporary fix. This is what I think about this
@@AbdulaImran I agree that identifying problems is crucial, but I also believe that starting from the older system may introduce more challenges. While we don't have "nothingness," the emotions of people who desire change are significant. So, if we try to fix this problem with the existing system, it would only increase the hopelessness in the people who already want change.
2 scholars for riba free alternative economic system:
- Bila Sood Bankaari Nizam by Dr. Tahir ul Qadri
- iqtisaadiyaat e islaam by Dr. Tahir ul Qadri
- Mufti taqi usmani sb's research on bila sood bankaari
Have a podcast with Qaiser Ahmed Raja.
With a monkey?😊
@@cheesesticksteaice5025 lundpujari lindu detected✅, opinion rejected✅
Hi Muzammil, your namesake here.
In principle, I do think that the model where state oversees the matters of religion is something that may work but there are catastrophic problems with it when it comes to practicality. In Saudia Arab, the imam of Kabaa cannot mention the politiical duty of the state in order to boycott Israel in order to put pressure, any of cleric who talks against MBS' decisions of modernizing the country is put in jail. In Pakistan, I can see an even severe version of this. The majority of the population definitely doesn't want to go there and given that people are emotionally driven something like that might even result in a huge civil unrest.
Tbh I was thinking the same about you being a pro secular and an anti Islamic person.
The good news is you're not and are willing to show flexibility depending on the argumentation and the conclusion is ''Husn Zan rakhna chahiye apne bhaee k baray main.''
And I would request that aik podcast qaiser ahmed raja aur sahil adeem se kerein please.
agar wo secular hotay to ap kya kehtay?
@@rumi-boss
Agr hotay to phir bhi kuch na hota bs dil mai kdoort si peda ho jaati is par to ab insan qadir nhi kay isay khtm kr saky.
Agree, hum as a nation abhi itny educated nhi huey k different opinions ko hazam kr sakain, isliye backlash milta hy apko, apki ye video shayd k 10 saal bad majority nation smjhny k kabil hogi q k revolution a raha hy log politicians or so called neem mullah khatra emaan k effects sy nikal rahy hain. But very well done I appreciate your efforts and your courage to speak about the topics which many people don’t get into just to avoid the backlash they will get from the hyper nation. 😊
You have invited many secular and liberal guests on your podcast but haven't featured any Islamic speakers to discuss the Islamic system. Why is that?
Sir please watch Asad Zaman’s podcast on Islamic Financial Systems as well as Shershah’s episode on evolution of Islamic civilization over the last 1000 years. Both are available on the channel.
Can we get sahil adeem and qiaser ahmed raja on islamic system
@@TBTGO Sure I'll watch that. Thanks
@@crazyoladno
@@BilluDon420 Why
Why aren't you talking about the biggest crisis atm, the G@z@ situation. I went through all the video, and i couldn't find one on thid topic except one podcast with AlKhidmat head Khalid Mahmood? Kindly share if there is one i might have missed.
But people like you should talk about such issues. It matters a lot.
whilst i am happy youtubers from pakistan are trying to raise the level of conversation on these type of topics , its a shame that someone cannot really research the topic they are speaking on as it is far more complex then presented , many of the examples need further clarification , for example the confused stance that allowing interest makes pakistan secular lol , or that countires that are on paper secular put pressure in a religious way on the public , its better to really make people understand the idea of secularism and how western nations came to remove religion from state and the reasons why , the short answer to the question is true secular countries are better on most good human indexes then most religious countries especially islamic countries which are some of the worst across indexes
Respectedly, I don't agree with you ke g Pakistan ki Masjid main toh Negativity phelaayi ja Rahi hai jabke Saudia or Middle East main Spirituality sikhayi ja Rahi hai, jabke agar actual baat ki jaaye toh Pakistan ki masajid se Sada E Haq buland hoti hai or Saudi Arabia ki Masajid ka Imam Regulated hota hai Jo ke khud aapne maana.
Pakistani Aalim E Deen ya Imam apni Society ki Problems and Pakistan ki Ground Realities ko dekhte huwe hi logo tak ek lessonable speech deliver karta hai jabke Saudi Arabia main agar koi Aalim E Deen aisi Islamic Terms ki BAAT kare Jo ke Saudi State ke khilaaf ho toh use wese hi Dhar liya jata hai jese yahan pe Kuch kaali Vigos aati hain.
Ab agar baat ki jaaye Islamic State ki ke woh actually hai Kya toh I agree ke Pakistani State bilkul bhi Islamic Rules and Principles of Governance ko follow Nahin Karti but actually agar Sahaba ki Governance ko dekha jaaye toh wahan yeh nizaam hargiz Nahin tha ke g Jo cheezein State decide kare bus wahi religion hai jabke koi or agar ikhtelaaf kare toh use utha lo never aisa bilkul bhi Nahin huwa.
Jabke badqismati se Saudi Arabia main agar baat ki jaaye Religious Freedom ki toh woh na hone ke barabar hai or aap use acha keh Rahe hain? Actually agar baat ki jaaye Seculars ki toh woh toh har waqt Freedom Of Speech ka wird alaanpte rehte hain toh ab Saudia main kahan gayi FOS?
Lastly i'm happy to see you bro ke aap dono aspects share kr rahe hain and aapne disclaimer bhi diya ke main aql e kul Nahin hoon Kisi ko mujhse bhi koi ikhtelaaf ho sakta hai.
Whenever I come to your channel I feel happy that at least someone is touching upon these important topics then I see your subscribers and feel sad they ae really low, I want this to reach each and every Pakisani.
Fact: Pakistan was built to provide a land where all religion should co-exist and live with each other that's why it wasn't Islamic republic of Pakistan till 1973.
True
Not entirly true for reference do study constitutions (3 diff) we had and struggle between different govts(civil nd mil) and constitution making assemblys in short even back then it was controversial topic e.g: Issue of qadianiat and sacking of Zafar ullah khan and others
Even if it had become Islamic state,their would have been freedom of Religion
Then why we take partitions from India??
Regardless of what the forefathers thought, my personal opinion is that the state should be Islamic. One should not base their identity on the beliefs of their forefathers rather use their own intellect.
Janab ap aik galti kar rhy nationalism main kabi bhi islami nizam nhi aa sakhta islami nizam ky leye sb muslim ko aik he land pe hona zaroori hai warna Afghanistan wali imarat tu aay gyi lakin khilafat nhi is leye islam main nationalism nhi
Sahi kaha
I found out this very fascinating thing by the way. Have someone ever noticed that the people from all the other religions like Christianity, Judaism and Sanatan have to leave their religion and becomes secular to progress before that they were all in their dark ages.
But for Muslim there was an exception. When the stuck to their religion Islam and its values they ruled the world they had a golden age they were more powerful than any other Empire or nation in the world. The moment they left the Islam they started crumbling and we can see the conditions today.
HarrahmKhor RUclipsr Ne Jiziya Tax Ko Secular Aur Tolerant Bana Diya 😂
You made one mistake where you assumed Barelelvi is a sect.
Its not a sect. Its an identity. The sect is Sunni.
Calling oneself a barelvi means.
We follow teachings of the prophet. But we use the knowledge given to us by Alaa Hazrat for better understanding of islamic teachings.
Literally, all the other sects say the same shit
@AbdullahKurd. think of it this way...
Each sect is a house of cards. Where if the foundation is weak... the whole thing falls apart...
Ahmedi believe there's another prophet... clearly this is wrong af. So we can ignore this one easily
Deobandi and wahabi believe the final prophet doesn't have as much power and isn't alive in their Graves... which clearly is wrong so another easy one to ignore
Ismail was founded by a man who was looking to gain power and money and he became wealthy by doing it. Aga khan is their leader and has never practiced actual teachings of Islam... so
If it cracks like a duck.. it's a duck...
Another easy to let go
Shia.... they curse sahabas and this is a huge no no... so another easy one to ignore...
Whats left... sunnism...
Where we never do any of the above.
So by process of elimination... this sect is the right one
Brother you should do podcast with eon
yes
Let me give you a hypothesis that why a secular Pakistan would benefit Pakistan and solve most issues that Pakistan faces today.
1) Secular education will bring about the change in mindset of Pakistanis.
2) Fundamentalism will be reduced due to change in mindset
3) People will not kill each other in the name of blasphemy due to the change in mindset
4) minorities will be safe and prosper
5) shia and ahmedi mosques will not be bombed
6) Terrorism will decrease
7) Relationship with countries like India, Afghanistan, Iran will improve
8) trade with these countries will improve
9) when all the above happens, Pakistan won't have to spend on the military as much as it does
10) tourism will increase which will give a boost to the service sector.
11) International investments(dollars) will pour in if they get a safe environment(afterall Pakistan has the 5th largest population in the world)
12) new companies will set up in Pakistan bringing job opportunities and new technologies.
13) Pakistanis will have more Purchasing power and consumption.
14) Domestic industries will thrive with new entrepreneurs
15) This will bring more export opportunities.
16) Globally Pakistani image becomes better
Then why is half of the secular countries still poor
@@fsu3328
Well of course secular countries need to have good economic policies to develop.
USA and whole of Europe is secular. They are all developed. India is Secular and it is too developing.
Pakistani society has become extremely religious. 90% of Pakistanis hate Hindus, they Hate Jews, they hate Christians, they hate Buddhists, they hate atheists. In fact they hate Shias, they hate Ahmedis. If your religion teaches to hate everyone, then of course we all will hate you back. You can’t develop or prosper when you don’t get along with anyone in the world.
Pakistan se Civilization 😂😂😂..
7000 saal pehle kounsa Pakistan tha???😂😂😂
😂😂
😂😂😂😂
acha tu 7000 saal pehle modi ka hindustan tha jahan ye civilization thi
They can't own non-M history of present day Pak territory but claim "civilization". Pak was formed when when person converted to Izlam after Qasim invaded Sindh in 712 but yeah we are "civilization". Can't make tv show on chanakya (but on Ottoman Ertugrul) but yeah "civilization". Claim Taj Mahal disown Ajanta Elora, Sanchi stupa but yeah "civilization". Fraud big0ts. Everything starts and ends with division between M and non-M.
@@MuhammadUmar-dx3el Abe bhootnik Hamare Ved -Puran- Bhagvad gita- Ramcharitamanas mein Bharat ka naam hai Aur uski boundary bhi batayi hai....hamare paas to poora proof hai....
Tum proof dikhao ki hazaaro saal pehle kis textbook mein pakistan ka naam hai...😂😂😂
In reality, I think there's a dire need of discovering a newer model of governance, where leaders of clergy and governance converge in the form of mutual dependence. There should be an elected council in my opinion that unanimously (not on majority) choses a leader and for rest of the matters the council either votes or determines if a population vote (direct democracy style) is required. Something along these lines could work in my opinion
Qaisar Ahmed raja
He is just a garbage
Person,
Bus behty ganga Mai haat
Dhony ka hunar ata hai
What about that monkey?
lol😂
@@cheesesticksteaice5025 apne baap ko monkey nahi bolte, paida kiya tha tujhe
😅😅😅😅
You said that if someone suggests implementing an interest-free system, then you'd ask that whether he's considered how it will impact others and how it will be implemented? Well, the vision (or the last step) always gets recognised first, then the previous steps and the first step is thought at the end when planning any work.
After more then 75 years if you are still confused if Pakistan is to be secular or to Shriat Based county.
Then it's mean you have been pranked by Your Creators in 1947 who didn't lay solid foundation for your future.
Making a homogeneous lslamic nation and then thinking about secularism it's absurd and l am amazed at so called intellectual absurdity.
Pakistan should be based on what the people believe
Kindly do something about the r_pe pandemic in rindia
@@Fundamental_Islam.
Why l have to do about it
I not the one doing it.
It's the government which should be concerned about that particular issue not me.
Yet you are so concerned about the identity of another country
Try to study Siyasi Nazriyat by Mufti Taqi Usmani sb to understand this matter with more clarity.
Golden era (Ummyyad Abbasid etc)of Islamic history was the fruit (result). We need to study the process how Muslims reached to that peak which starts from the time of struggle of Prophet Muhammad (SAW). So start from studying Seerah of Prohet Muhammad (SAW).
American allah will save mecca medina from shia iran
Bhai thy were Persians,now shia Iran..what has Pakistani Muslim got to do with Iranian history..they don’t even allow you to enter their country and you don’t even consider shia as Muslims..haha…just basking on borrowed laurels
Dear, kindly invite Mr. Qaiser Ahmed Raja on your podcast, and make it for 2-3 hrs., I believe it will be huge.🙂
No you are wrong india Vs Pakistan is no comparison Pakistan is highly radical society we are not same
just check indians comments in any muslim related video then tell
Because Indians know about
Reality about Muslims and Islam than countries like Japan, South Korea, Europe etc. why Europe is banning people from a Islamic countries
@@atifhameed-ic9hk off course the act of Muslim Hate in all crishtians and Hindu go and check all over the world
@@atifhameed-ic9hkSahi kaha
@@atifhameed-ic9hkThat should hv been the normal reaction of Indian (Hindus) once Pak was created. It is just 75 yrs too late.
There was zero Hindu Muslim confrontation on the basis of religion in whole period of 332 years of Mughal Empire in India.
Bhai ye tum pakistan studies mein padhte ho ya islamiyat mein....????
Jb ek ghar mein har hafte ladai hoti hee hai toh itne crore logo mein ladai nhi hogi ??? Aur vo bhi 330 yrs ke liye
@@Nitish.Singhal he means there was no riot reported that whole era....
Like your M.0di conducted Gujarat Ri0ts
@@afrazamjad1644 😂😂 riot reported....??
Are you for real ? Report nhi hua toh crime hua hee nhi....
Imran khan ki FIR nhi huyi mtlb usko goli nhi lagi??
Wow... What a logic
@@Nitish.Singhal By saying reported I meant witnessed.... Historically the British with their Divide and Rule Policy introduced this seed in the subcontinent.....
And BJP is successfully continuing the legacy
@@afrazamjad1644 Divide ka implementation kisine kara muslims ne....
Bjp ne partition karwaya tha ya jinnah ne.... ??
Hypocrisy is the enemy of humans. They don't do things sincerely. Islam ko sincerely follow kariye jaise Khulafa e Rashideen ke time pe common man se lekar Governors aur Khalifah khud follow karte they. This is the only solution. May Allah keep us sincere.
Islam and Muslims have never been moral nor ethical. They have been fighting and killing each other from the start. 3-0ut of the 4- Khulafa e Rashideen were murdered by.......Muslims. Islam is not a peaceful religion.
Muzamil brother, we want to see you with QAR.
And those who do not judge by what Allah has revealed are ˹truly˺ the disbelievers. Surah maida
agar india anti minority hai to why christian , jews , parsi , jain , sikh ( baring khalistani ) , buddhist thrive in india , there is no hate against them . becz india is not anti minority it is anti islam . indian / hindu DNA is secular hence it is against any religion which says only our religion is right not yours. and from the mehargarh and indus valley civilisation hinduism started . hindu vedas were written on banks of sindh near rawalpindi . so own that too that you were hindu before but got converted due to brutal invasions. dont cherry pick history to suit islamic narrative.
Bro ye uska fixed opinion hai , he is a syed which means his ancestors are here from Saudi Arabia...
He is taught and fed this from birth... How superior he and his family is ...
So he has a highly biased view... Iske duniya Islam hee hai bas...
Ye 99% islamic country mein paida hua hai isliye isko reality ka koi touch nhi hai....
His career aim in teenage years was to become a Moulvi....
And i am 100% sure he will become one soon 😂😂
Abe Bhai ye Syed kuch nahi hai , Inka proper genetic testing hua hai . The story is false. They don't have so called lineage . The probable theory is the first one who got converted during Islamic invasion or who got married/ra*ped had children converted to Islam and then started calling themselves Syed . The genetic study suggests same . As they have only small Arabic element in gene during invasion happened. Ye khudko kuch aur hi samajte Hai and ye bhai alag form me hote hai ki bhai hum Syed hai .
@@worldgeography2229
Bro khuch real bhi hote aur mostly nakli bhi... Lekin inki mentality same hoti hai...
Which is superiorty complex..
Iska point of view aur tumhara point of view different hai , kyuki tumhare liye truth khuch aur hai aur iske liye khuch aur ....
Usko apni baat kehne do
Tum apni baat keh do.... Bus gaaliya avoid kro....
Gaali likhte hee tumhari shi baat bhi galat ban jayegi....
Tum iski soch ko comments se change nhi kr skte...bas criticise kr skte ho....
Pakistan mein iss time youth ka bura haal hai lakho bchhe islamic content ke naam British pakistani moulvi ke fans hai....
They have cult following 😂....
Aur inko sapne dikhake hai ticket bech dete hai ..
Pakistan mein retirement profession is moulvi...😂😂
Kabhi kisi indian cricketer ko dekha hai jo pandit ban gya ho retirement ke baad
Sab fraud mamla hai...
Kisi celebrity ki video leak hojaye toh ldki hijab and burka and ldka moulvi with beard....
Inke liye islam escapism hai knowledge nhi ...
India mein jitni bhi problems ho log masjid mein bomb toh nhi phodte....
Aur naa hee kbhi hoga...
Kyuki jo Gaye ko roti khilate hai aur jo gaye ko roti ke sath khaate hai unme insaniyat ka farak hota hai....
@@nabanildas5819 😂 for you its waste , for me its taking and learning perspective from other side....
Agar mein ye video nhi dekhunga toh India successful ho jayega kya?
@@Nitish.Singhal bdw bhai kahase ho and what you do .
AOA Sir, Me Balochistan se or aap ki bat se muttafiq rkhta hn k Pakistan ko ek Nation state with official religion Islam hona chaiye or Pakistan me religion ko lany ka reason yhi tha k yha k different ethnicities ko ek Nation bnaya jaye. cultural values ko discourage kr k unko ek banner k nechy laya jaye which seems odd. because religion me different sects k waja se alag confusion hy. Islam is the complete code of life but in Pakistan Islam has never been practiced in true sense which begins with tolerance. Thank you.
Choose one :
Want Pakistan to be Islamic or Want Pakistan to be peaceful and it's people to be happy no matter their religion.
Islamic system is not the way to life if it was Afghanistan would be the most developed and happiest nation on earth.
its only been 2 years afghanistan has got independence and despite been sanctioned by whole world its is still in way better condition then secular liberal pakistan, afghanistan is competing with bangladesh and india meanwhile pakistan is competing with secular srilanka
@@user-yh1qd7lj5f LOL, better condition how ?? Don't make me laugh. Pakistan is a big country. But at least we don't have 109th hunger index like India. Also afghanistan is doomed no matter what. Afghanistan is the poorest country on earth last time I checked andhbkhakt.
As your conclusion, your thoughts are same as Qaiser Ahmed Raja thats why i think you should work together.
Qaiser Ahmed Raja and Sahil Adeem are just using Islam to make tons of money.
Muzammil bhai once again you are speaking on things your don't understand. Please focus on the thing you were good at i.e. entrepreneurs, engineers etc.
In the entire video you didn't speak of sovereignty. That's the first thing that should be discussed in this debate.
You also did not talk about which type of secularism. Liberalism, Socialism or Fascism ?
You are wrong about Indonesia. They have Sharia law for public Zina. 100 lashes. Go read about it. This happened in 2022.
This video is embarrassing.
Indonesia as a whole is secular according to their constitution. Only one small province out of 38 has parts of Shariah law. All other provinces are fully secular. You’re accusing me of not knowing stuff while quoting half truths. The fact is both of us are on a journey of exploring ideas so it would be better if you would be a little more humble in your opinions.
As far as the things I didn’t speak about, you are more than welcome to add to the discourse. Just because I didn’t add the things you want to hear doesn’t mean they don’t exist or I excluded them intentionally. There is only enough content I can fit into one video and therefore it is better to add anything you’d like to add with a bit more grace and respect.
Regarding your mention of the types of secularism, where did you come up with those three types? While liberalism speaks about secularism, socialism is inherently about economic policy and has nothing to do with theological aspects of governance. Similarly, fascism is a far right ideology that has at many times included Christian nationalism. These are basic facts, you can Google them and read more about them and when you realize that you in fact did not know enough about the matter yourself, I hope you reflect on how embarrassing it is to accuse someone else of lack of knowledge when you are prone to making the same mistakes yourself.
I am not trying to attack or belittle you, I was where you are once as well. So I hope you learn to approach discussions more respectfully. Trust me, it will give you a lot of joy and growth in life. I promise.
@@TBTGO Indonesian law is divided in 3. Civil, commercial and criminal. Outside of the "small" province of Aceh the civil law of Indonesia is Islamic. The commercial law also has Islamic laws in it. Who's speaking in half truths?
Its not about what i want you to speak on. The whole idea of secularism and Islam rests on Sovereignty. It's the basic first principle.
Secularism means keeping religion apart from the decisions you take. At the political level these three are the most recent the world has seen. Communism is a type of socialism that talks about how the state should be run after religion is kept apart. Fascism is about race. Aryan or Italian in their recent episodes. Christianity is used as one of the binding factors. But does not take away its secular nature.
Most importantly Secular state is a part of secularism. Not the entirety of it.
Please educate yourself on the above topics. It's easy to talk all arrogant and make rude comments while stating you aren't belittling me.
I look forward to you acting on your own advice and admitting how little you know about this topic.
@tbtgo
Waiting for your reply.
@@DWAGON1818you are right, I was also wondering the same thing, it seems this video would have been much better with better research
@@DWAGON1818I couldn't find those beautiful beautiful types of Secularism.
Care to provide your source that backs up your claim and please no irrelevant article .
Indonesia is also like Pakistan a confused state pretending to be religious but aren't.
Why Muzammil brother you open up a separate page or a group where everyone comes up on a certain topic to discuss the stuff. And you can provide a link to each of your video.
Where the hell are the qaisar raha bots coming from 😅
He wants attention from others for making his reaction videos to gain more subscribers on his channel by criticizing others, hence why there is so many of these bots you would see under many Pakistani RUclips channels
True
True, I was thinking the same
He has been doing a pretty effective job and to the grassroot level for what he thinks is right .one might not like him but undermining such a committed person is a mistake particularly for those who consider him as an opponent.
I would like to maintain a healthy debate over here. The reason why you are seeing many people asking Muzammil to do a Podcast with Qaiser Ahmed Raja is because of QAR being an educated person. His views might not be perfect for you but that doesn't change the fact that QAR has done a lot. He has made discourses much easier.
There is no golden period ..if you are talking about the Baghdad era then it would be better to to read the history after the radicals took power and burnt all the books ...
I also think that muzammil hasn't read a single book on Abbasid era which was technically the golden age of islam
Pehli chiz sir ap jin Islamic nizam ki bt kr rhe hen wo aaenge to shayad zada acha nhi rhe Lekin zara Ap (swa) k nizam k according chala jay to sb acha hoga.
Or second chiz thk bht se log is chiz k lie agree nhi honge qk logo ka lifestyle change hogaya ha ab bht Lekin ye bbi compulsory nhi k ya to islamic ho ha secular dono ko maintain barabar rkh kr bhi country chl skti ha or is trhn har chiz ma bht achi ho skti.
But abbi hme sb se important apne education pr km krna ha or iska mtlb ue nhi nust literacy rate zada krna ha achi or equal education bhi compulsory ho.
Or sb se pehle education system hi change ho jo chl rha ha ratta ratta usse bacho ko koi faida nhi hona just time or bacho ki ability zaya ho rhi ha.
Now, this is getting interesting. Love you ho gya Muzamil bhai wada wada ❤ looking forward for further episodes
One of the great podcasters in Pakistan
😂😂😂 just based on beef bans in certain states, you can't compare secularism of India with Pakistan. I mean, I feel pity on people like you. They don't even bother reading about political framework or constitution at all. In India past 75 years, there were 2 Muslim Presidents, 4 Muslims education ministers, 2 R.A.W Chiefs, IB Chiefs ( equalant to your DGISI post), Muslims Election commissioner , 3 Muslims Chief Ministers give me one non-Muslims in pakistan during past 75 Years, Mr Muzzamil. So don't show your intellectual bankruptcy by comparing India and Pakistan just based on beef bans and unfortunate lynching incidents. In fact, during So called Fascist regime of Modi, IB ( intelligence Bureau), the chief was Muslim. I challenge you to make any non-Muslim person to your DGISI. You won't be able to do it in your lifetime.
Pakistan ko exist hee nahi krna chahiye thaaa😅😅
Teri maan ki
Kiun??
Bat ya ha k Pakistan ka name srf "islami repulic " ha...islamic repulic system implement nhi hoa hmary mulk mn...agr islamic system implement ho tb sahi mano mn change dekhyyy ga..
Agr mn apna ak muslim name rakh loon r kam mary sary glt hn to mn muslman to nhi.....rayst e madina mn islamic nzam implement kea gea tbhi vo ak ideal society bnii..
Beautiful, Muzamil you've explained it very nicely & I agree with a lot of things & disagree with a few things as well. We have to admit that we're not living in an Islamic State (keeping in mind that it'll be dangerous as it'll disturb the majority of the nation) but we've to admit it so that we can change it after that. & Yes, Education & Commerce are a must, to go even a step further in achieving an Islamic State.
I personally believe that both the wings need to sit down together and formulate the necessities which both want. In Old islamic times, even at times of civil wars, armies used to unite against foreign invasions. So we should unite and see what both bring to the table.
@@QuickLit-0401
Ifwe admit that this is not islamic state then there will be adverse reaction by religious groups and will end up with ideologies of like of taliban and ISKP in society. And they will get sympathy and support by majority of people who would want "islamic system".
@@DanishAli-rm2ky I haven't seen a molvi yet who states that this is an islamic state. They themselves state that Rule of Law isn't being followed here.
Before any step is taken, we must ensure that everyone has knowledge of the both sides, after that if they still state that Islamic system is necessary, than that's a different story.
But Islamic, inherently isn't anything bad, it doesn't hinder progress of society in any sort of way, shape or form.
Muzammil, please define what you mean by Muslim Country. Is it a country where majority population is Muslim ? or where the Head of the State is a Muslim ? or where the Laws are Islamic ? please define these terms "Muslim Country" and "Islamic Country" that you have used so often in this video. Also before you define these terms do research and tell your audience... if Islaam allows Muslims to be divided by virtual borders on a map into countries.....
PAKISTAN SHOULD BE LIBERAL !!
Why?
Tou abhi kia hai?? Liberal na hota tou yeah aurat march , fashion/award shows ya fahashi hoti?
@@Mr-HALAL-OFFICIAL liberalism is also source of good prosperous economics stable life
@@shahreyarcool311 why america is funding israel in g3n0c!d3
@@shahreyarcool311 I would disagree brother
Sir Syed Ahmed was a misguided individual... Who thought Queen of England was a representative of God on earth ... And .. Muslims should help the colonial power in every way according to the wishes of Colonial masters.
Secularism ❤
We agree with your opinion, Muzamill Hassan. May Allah give you more knowledge
Muzammil bhai, love your content, and i am learning from you a lot from this series "dill ki baat", Jazakallah khair. I may be wrong but what I perceived from your conversations on this series is that being spiritual is most prevalent part of Islam which i do not agree on, but today on your definition of Islamic system, I think I may be wrong on perceiving that about you. Apart from that, I believe that all aspects of life, such as science, philosophy, economics, social matters and most importantly politics can managed by Islamic system and with which can yield utmost benefits to nation and its people. Also when Sahil Adeem is coming to TBT Podcast muzammil bhai.
اچھا سیکیولر ریاست کی بات مان کر ہم اپنے ملک میں یہ نظام لے آتے ہیں۔ پھر آپ کے خیال میں اس نظام میں آپ مسجدوں کے ساتھ ساتھ چرچوں، مندروں، گردواروں کو قائم ہونے کی اجازت اور انکی تبلیغ کی اجازت دی جاۓ۔ تو پھر جو افراد غیر اسلامی ملکوں میں رو رہے ہیں کے ہمارے بچے دین سے دور ہو رہے ہیں وہی صورتحال ہمارے ملک میں بھی ہو جائے گی۔ اس کا کیا حل ہوگا پھر؟
Jo afrad ghair muslim mulkon me reh rahi hain apni marzi se reh rahay hain un ko yarghamal bana kar nahi rakha gaya hai. Agar unhay koi problem hai to wo apnay dar-ul-islam Islami mulkon me wapis ja saktay hain. Ghair muslim mulkon me musalmano ko islami mumalik se ziada mazhabi aazadi hai aur masajid madrassay bananay aur tableegh karnay ke poori aazadi hai.
Musalman mantay hain ke un ka mazhab sab se achcha hai to wo dosray mazahib ke Islami mulkon me tableegh se kiyon dartay hain. Jis ka maal achcha hota hai us ko 2 number ke maal se koi khatra nahi hota.
you are right that you dont have an agenda but people listen and follow you- subconsciously too.
A famous saying with great power comes great responsibility.
You just need to be responsible in what you say because it shapes the certain group of people
Hi muzamil bhai,
I"m a student of IR, firsrly I appreciate your role in this intellectual renaissance, you can't imagine how much knowledge I have gained through your various series. May Allah bless you and give you more power.
secondly, I completely agree to you that Pakistan should be an "Islamic socialist democratic republic" and governed by the core principles of Islam mentioned in the Quran and Sunnah. This should be done after thorough discussions on core topics through a structured system that ensures equal representation of all Islamic sects.
Best Regards,
Hafiz Rana M. Junaid Sabir
Loving the series...dill ki baat. ❤
Zaidi sahab, everything I wanted to say after watching the last video and reading the comments, you covered really well in the first half of this one. Kudos and thank you! Regarding secular vs Islamic system, honestly it is a bit of a red herring. It is not a binary choice. If the majority of the population in a country is practicing Muslim, the country will inherently be Muslim in it's nature, because of the social mores informed by Islam. Even in a secular but representative system, legislation will reflect those social mores. In a secular system if the country decides they don't want riba, for whatever reson, they can work to solution for that if they so choose. Pakistan as a state with Islam as the state religion sounds great as a thought experiment, but in practical terms, it would take immense effort over years, intellegigent, committed and pragmatic leaders and buy-in from stakeholders across society and the political spectrum. It would also involve individual mullahs and the madrassas giving up their autonomy and authority to the state. Honestly, I don't see that happening barring some sort of miracle. The religious right when they speak of establishing a Muslim state, i dont think they mean that they will give up their authority to the state. Quite the opposite, I do believe they mean to be the power brokers if not the power holders in an absolute theocracy, and implementation of their personal interpretation of sharia. The ruhit comitte cant even agree on the moon sighting, when it should be a non issue and not a controversial matter every single time. We also have a council of Islamic ideology already, and their record has been ignoble more often than not, a disservice to country and religion. Yes, having a unifying sense of direction is important for nation building, but for Pakistan to succeed under any model of governance, stability and good governance, especially economic governance, is key. Whether that good governance is being delivered by mullah gov, wadera or secular goverment, without infringement of too many personal freedoms, in the end people wont care. Outcomes matter. In my opinion, the economic model / economic governance needs to be part of the conversation of the overall governance model. Even per Islamic tradition, Khalifa Umar would judge his governors not on how good a person /Muslim they were or how well people observed Islam under their rule. Instead their performance was judged on their practical performance and how successful and happy the people were in thier area. If the people were unhappy and public affairs had not been managed well, the governor was to be changed. There wasn't a religious police, and there wasn't a goverment mandated dress code and even the Khalifa applied common sense "spirit of the law" principle in changing circumstances rather than the letter of the law (he put in abeyance the Quranic punishment for theft when the circumstances warranted it, in the spirit of justice ". What we also know from the sunnah is that muslims are extolled in thier personal and state level decisions to confer with each other, discuss and develop a concensus or with the majority opinion. The stae is required to treat each citizen equally before the law, arab or non arab, Muslim or non Muslim and non Muslim subjects have the freedom to practice thier religion and manage their own affairs. All of the above together sounds very much like a representative democracy to me, with a lot of personal freedom, and government accountable to the governed.
Brother, Why apostasy are increasing in Pakistan ? Being student observed among Youths, is unfavorable for Islam.
BHAI please podcast with QAISER AHMAD RAJA
Agar Allah ka hukum maanna faidai aur nuqsaan par dependent hai phir tou koi bhi Allah ki rah mai kabhi struggle na kerai. Woh jo Islam mai we hear and we obey ka concept hai, phir tou woh bhi applicable he na ho. Jab sood ko khatam karnai ka hukum aya tha tou us waqt bhi logoan ka us k saath rozgar laga hoowa tha. Agar yeh baat hoti k pehlai conditions saazgar ho jaiyn tou phir ham Allah ka hukum manain gai is logic k saath tou mecca sai madina bhi hijrat nahi honi chahiyay thi ya gazwa badar bhi nahi honi chahiyay thi kyun k haalaat sazgaar nahi thai.
75/76 saal sai ham yahi soch rahai hain k alternative koi way milai tou ham Allah ka hukum maanain.
Say, [O Muhammad], "If your fathers, your sons, your brothers, your wives, your relatives, wealth which you have obtained, commerce wherein you fear decline, and dwellings with which you are pleased are more beloved to you than Allah and His Messenger and jihad in His cause, then wait until Allah executes His command. And Allah does not guide the defiantly disobedient people." (Quran 9:24)