The Witcher 3 Next Gen Ultra+ Settings VS Ray Tracing FSR 4K | 7900 XTX | R9 7950X 3D

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 25 апр 2024
  • ENEBA - great place to buy games (PS5, Xbox, PC)! ene.ba/Bang4Buck
    All games, DLC! ene.ba/Bang4Buck-Store
    Gift Cards! ene.ba/Bang4Buck-GiftCards
    Affiliate
    SCAN.CO.UK - A great place to buy PC parts tidd.ly/4aLCyyk
    Check out how the RX 7900 XTX Nitro+ and Ryzen 9 7950X 3D performs in The Witcher 3, using Ultra+ Settings VS Ray Tracing and FSR 2 at 4K.
    My PC Specification
    AMD Ryzen 9 Ryzen 9 7950X 3D
    Asus ROG Strix X670E-F Gaming WIFI Motherboard
    Sapphire Nitro+ RX 7900 XTX
    G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 6400Mhz @6200MHz DDR5 32GB 16x2 CL28-37-37-28 trc 68 1.43v
    Custom Waterloop
    EK CoolStream XE 360mm Radiator
    EK-WB Velocity AMD Waterblock
    XSPC Photon X270 Reservoir V2 with D5 Vario Pump.
    AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition Driver 24.3.1
    Corsair HX1000i PSU
    Samsung 850 EVO 1 TB
    Samsung 860 QVO 1 TB
    Pioneer 1TB SSD APS-SL3-1T
    Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe 4.0 M.2 SSD 1TB
    LG B9 "55" 120Hz 4K HDR Smart TV.
    Thermal Take View 71 Full Tower Case
    Windows 11 Pro Version 22H2
    #7950x3d #rx7900xtx #witcher3
  • ИгрыИгры

Комментарии • 20

  • @Bang4BuckPCGamer
    @Bang4BuckPCGamer  Месяц назад +4

    Ultra+ settings are demanding at 4K with FSR, let alone Ray Tracing.

  • @dilerdaller
    @dilerdaller Месяц назад +5

    the performance hit in this game with raytracing is actually so insane. egregious even for a very minor uplift. yes raytracing can look very good but mostly a gimmick not worth using atm in my opininon id rather have raster on with much higher textures even 8k in a gen or 2.

  • @bnbnism
    @bnbnism Месяц назад +3

    The performance impact for the visual difference isn't worth it for me personally although there are mods to further imporve the RT, but I go with non RT max + a reshade preset

  • @Ruhlii
    @Ruhlii Месяц назад

    Ahaha, great performance from your xtx, making me feel inadequate about my 4080

  • @bog2501
    @bog2501 15 дней назад

    Hey man. Nice vid. I love the witcher 3 game! Are you using fsr on quality for the ultra+ preset too? I'm playing on a 7900 xtx too but my cpu it's a 13600k and on 4k ultra+ TAAU settings my pc struggles to hit 60 fps although i see old witcher 3 footage with the same settings that run with much more fps. Maybe the game got broken by some update?

  • @armandomartinez2699
    @armandomartinez2699 Месяц назад

    Your core is only at 2300mhz? Did you undervolt? Usually 1100mv for me gets me 2800mhz minimum.

    • @Bang4BuckPCGamer
      @Bang4BuckPCGamer  Месяц назад

      What are you talking about? Put a time stamp.

    • @armandomartinez2699
      @armandomartinez2699 Месяц назад

      @@Bang4BuckPCGamer 7:02 for example. I meant the 7900xtx to be clear. I know your 7950X3D and 14900KS RIP through the Hertz.

    • @Bang4BuckPCGamer
      @Bang4BuckPCGamer  Месяц назад

      ​@@armandomartinez2699 It's obvious you are talking about the 7900 XTX. I am still asking for a time stamp of what you are actually talking about, The XTX core is clearly averaging 2700MHz.

  • @AMD718
    @AMD718 Месяц назад

    DLSS to FSR3 frame generation mod works perfect in this game. Just have to use version 0.10.3

  • @ChildofLight777
    @ChildofLight777 Месяц назад +1

    Very minor differences. RT here seems to be oversaturated with warm and vibrance. Ultra+ is far more color accurate, for example 6:13

    • @Ghost-pb4ts
      @Ghost-pb4ts Месяц назад

      RT here seems to be oversaturated with warm and vibrance (Even that not by much)
      path tracing has spoiled us

  • @plastichairball
    @plastichairball Месяц назад +2

    The non ray traced looks so flat.

  • @markojovanovic6928
    @markojovanovic6928 Месяц назад +2

    This is the best ray tracing comparison I've seen. Instead of picking scenes that show the improvements, actually playing the game for half an hour through different scenes, times of the day shows that the difference is very small in actual gameplay

    • @MihailC6
      @MihailC6 Месяц назад +2

      It can’t be that you don’t see a clear difference, and in many aspects. In the open world, we see self-shading on any vegetation. In the landscape, from the point of realism, where it should be dark it really dark, where it should be bright it really bright, nothing merges into a mess. Moreover, shadows have a much greater range of depth and distinction, which in combination with other colors, adds more expressive contrast. This is not to mention that the quality of the shadows themselves is higher. Indoors the situation is even more obvious, although in open spaces even on small objects there is shading where it should be.

  • @Acesbomb
    @Acesbomb Месяц назад +2

    Honestly I think raytracing is a gimmick. HDR done well is more impressive. I’ve a 4090 and I find it all meh.

    • @George-um2vc
      @George-um2vc Месяц назад +7

      RT is NOT a gimmick it’s just very intensive, soon games won’t even have a RT toggle, it will just ship with the game, we are already seeing this with titles like Avatar and Alan Wake which ALWAYS use some form of RT.
      Ray Tracing IS the future of gaming for 2 reasons.
      1. It eliminates a huge amount of time devs need to put in setting up baked lighting
      2. It looks way better and makes all games with dynamic time of day infinitely easier to make.

    • @CJBhattarai
      @CJBhattarai Месяц назад

      it is still a baby in video game tech so let see how it will be in later on....very good implementation of HDR and ray tracing will be one to behold....

    • @Ghost-pb4ts
      @Ghost-pb4ts Месяц назад

      who knows there will be a future ray tracing patch in 5 to 6 years or a MOD
      raytracing has multiple level of RAY tracing
      that might make a huge difference
      hdr and raytracing are two different things
      but yeah difference here is close to neglible especially when you see the performance loss