Ultimate Leica Showdown: Q vs SL vs M System?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 30 июл 2024
- Join me as I compare the ultimate Leica cameras - the Q, M system, and SL - to find out which one is best for your photography needs. Get a detailed breakdown of each camera and decide which one is right for you!
I've used all 3 of these systems in the field, I hope this provides you with some guidance before you invest or don't invest in a Leica system.
🛒 LEICA SL2-S SHOP ON AMAZON amzn.to/3BNeXLE
🛒 LEICA Q2 SHOP ON AMAZON amzn.to/3wez7wV
🛒 LEICA M10 SHOP ON AMAZON amzn.to/3q6r8Rt
► ABOUT ME
MY 1:1 COACHING www.askmottbyjustinmott.com/p...
MY PRESETS www.askmottbyjustinmott.com/p...
MY GEAR www.amazon.com/shop/justinmott
MY PORTFOLIO www.justinmott.com
MY NEWSLETTER www.askmottbyjustinmott.com/n...
DISCLAIMER: This video and description contain affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support the channel and allows me to continue to make videos like this. Thank you for the support!
Timestamps
0:00 Intro
4:00 Aesthetic/Feel
11:02 Features
17:55 Value
22:20 Conclusion
Which Leica system do you use?
Q and M 👍🏼
Q and M is a killer combo.
Owning a Leica is the dream! But the high price is more than just money... for me it's the opportunity cost of a plane ticket and time... lots and lots of time on location somewhere, taking photos, becoming better. It could mean the difference between affording a photo workshop or not. There are so many considerations beyond just the cameras and lenses themselves. For me, for now.. my Leica system is Fuji ;-)
Leica SL2 … with no regrets
SL2 studio
M10-R Documentary and street
Q2 travel and Documentary
Wow Justin,
Another great video with awesome and solid explanations of these 3 systems.
Q2 satisfies me but love to have an M soon.
Thank you so much for the awesome video.
Great video, as usual. Thanks. I (regretfully) sold my M240 and three Zeiss lenses because my aging eyes could no longer do all that well with manual rangefinder focusing. Wish I had kept the lenses. I now shoot with the original Leica Q, Q2 Monochrom and CL for my "system" camera. I'm very happy with all of these.
That's a great setup Fran, the Q is so solid and such great value as crazy as thought sounds to many. I'm considering either an SL2-S for video or a Leica monochrome. How do you like the Monochrome?
@@AskMOTT , buying the Q2 Monochrome was a real gamble. I thought that it was far more practical to sell my Q and get the Q2 and to just keep converting images to B&W, but I also knew that though I didn't want to start shooting film again, I wanted a B&W experience like walking down the street with only Tri-x in my camera. Now that I have it, no regrets. When I go shoot with it, I bring no other camera with me. I love the limitation. As for the files, my experience is that they are just as advertised - incredible luminance range and wonderful higher ISO rendition. Yeah, I really like it.
Just bought an M240 as I was an M6 shooter back in the day. I have a Leica Q. It’s so compact, easy to use and the image quality is fantastic. I just don’t like 28mm as my go to lens. So I’m selling my Q and planning to buy a CL. I also already have some Sigma L mount lenses.
I roll with a Film Leica M-A and a Digital M-P 240. They share lots of M mount lenses. Oh so happy.
Lovely set up :)
I shoot on a Q2. You were one of the youtubers who convinced me to get it. Thank you.
Are you happy with it Daniel? It’s a gorgeous camera.
TY for the video!!
When using the M lenses on the SL using the adapter, do you have any ray angle issues like when using adapted M
Lenses on non leica Bodies? Ty!!!
Very good review and honest opinion, very well explained. Sl2s is on my wish list as my eyes gone downhill lately so the M series I just can forget about although I used an m6ttl titanium in the past.
The original Q is my all time favorite camera and I’ve used a lot of cameras in many different formats. I owned a few M film & digital bodies, but once I tried the Q I was in love. The M is great if as a photographer one is still and are waiting for the subject to enter the frame or are composing carefully. But as someone who moves a lot while shooting moving subjects the Q simplifies the shooting process.
Just secured my first Leica, a Q2 007 edition. Expensive? Of course, but I have two special reasons for purchase. Firstly, Goldfinger was the first film that my mother took me to see in town. Went by double decker bus. Secondly, my mobile phone number ends in 007. Then there's the disease I have. Nothing serious. More an addiction. Don't panic, it is only photography and nice gear. Don't have too many premium products, most being middle of the range, but I'm at a stage where aesthetics and quality 'feel' are far more important to me than money [within reason].
Hope to have it delivered by Friday afternoon. Very excited.
I bet you’re excited , such a cool backstory for you with Goldfinger. Enjoy your new beauty and post a picture when you get it an tag me, I’d love to see it.
Is there anything I can help you do and in return I earn a bit fund to get standard Q2?
I can do logo design, origami, Chinese translation, tech consult and so on
I needed this video. I have the M10 and Q2 today, and right now the M10 went down to Wetzlar for service …and Leica sent me the SL2-S with a 24-90 lens as a loaner meanwhile. I start to like the SL2-S, but it’s a monster… I really like using it with my M-lenses, but I somehow feel that they belong on a M. Also, something you mention that makes a ton of sense for me is that using the SL2-S is a commitment to take photos, with the other two …I can just throw it down my messenger bag.
Only had the SL2-S for a couple of days so maybe I will get used to the weight. We will see..
Really liked the video and you had great points. Thank you. ☺️
Thank you Daviden, I just did a video about using the Ricoh GR3 as a back up or complimentary camera that might appeal to you. I also like that SL but mainly for video but I really need to see how I like it for video coupled w M lenses as I just hate lugging around those giant lenses these days.
I love how discreet the Q is when traveling to places where locals are suspicious of photographers. I’m able to build more trust with locals than when I traveled with a DSLR.
Hahhahahha
Same here))) with dslr you look like normal tourist))
@@markterrin8673 Do mirrorless count, like the Canon R-series? I shoot street and my kit of Zeiss primes and 5D4 suddenly got too heavy and bulky, so I moved to an R. (Well, not suddenly- I bought into a Fuji X system, lots of nice glass, but hated the files. Gave it away.) With the R, same zeiss ef lenses, same weight, a tad lighter. Bought a Q, love it, but there are times I want more choice in lenses.
I had an M in the 80s and 90s and was never in love, but I had R3 and R4s which I liked much better. Not sure I'd love an M like I should, but I'm considering a SL2 to accept my adaped leica glass. Maybe I can work into replacing those big lenses with either AF SL glass, or smaller adapted M lenses,
Choices and not enough money.
Hey Justin, thanks for this review/summary/comparison.
I imagine you've had assignments in places with extreme-ish weather conditions so I'd like to know if you've encountered any situation when even your back-up died or almost died on you and hence, which camera/model has been the most reliable back-up?
Leica Q2's 3:2 ratio image with 28mm lens's iPhone 4:3 ratio image with 26mmlens, which one is wider?
I used the Leica M system off and on for years as a newspaper photographers in Pensacola, Florida. However, the wide ranging demands of press work demanded most of my work be done with SLR cameras. But, in the few years before I retired the demand to shoot video for online and stills, almost always at the same time, pushed me to try and use the Leica V-Lux 114, a 25-400mm superzoom camera. I know the 114 is to Leica what the 914 was to a lot of Porsche fans but it's a very versatile camera, especially for travel. It never let me down and deserves some recognition.
Hello Bruce , I can imagine the demands of a newspaper gig would be challenging w manual focus for sure and I can definitely relate to doubling up on shoots.
I have the Leica M3 and am considering the Leica Q2, but I'm wondering why not the Lumix S5 or even the Lumix S1R? Both take the L mount lenses, are weather and dust resistant, and at a better price point. I need to go to a camera shop and hold the SL2 to find out for myself.
Justin, do you prefer the rangefinder focusing system to the focussing system on the Q2? If the Q2 was an interchangeable lens type camera how would you rate it against the M10?
Great question George, I do prefer manual focusing , I suppose I just like the process of doing it myself and I love an optical viewfinder compared to EVF. Not sure if I’d prefer the Q if it is interchangeable lenses, but I still much prefer the overall design and feel of the M, it’s so perfect.
Thanks for another great video! I use the SL2 and Q2. How large of a print would you feel comfortable printing from the SL2-S?
Thank you watching, I haven't printed with it yet but honestly it's a similar sensor to my M10-D and I've printed that at 16X24 and it looks great.
Really interesting and well put. Thank you 👍
I really just want to know that loft space in your opening scene. Is that your apartment. I'm planning to move to SE Asia in the next year or so when things open back up and love loft spaces which seem hard to find.
That is my house, here is a full video I made about it. ruclips.net/video/aOulsG_Iw9Y/видео.html
One for sale still in my building :).
I shoot the Q2 and SL2-S. I had and loved my M10, but my eyesight has gone downhill and I can no longer focus it reliably. I also don’t shoot in bright light, so zone focusing doesn’t cut it for me on the M10. For what it’s worth, the Q2 on the holster strap is a great way to carry it. With the holster strap, I can still wear a backpack and keep the camera ready to shoot.
Nice setup Hatef, are you using video a lot on the SL2-S, if so how do you like it?
@@AskMOTT not yet Justin. I’m moving to Jordan in a couple of months. I hope to work with video when I get there. I’ll let you how it goes.
I appreciate your time and effort making this for us.
Thank you Marc.
Very useful. Thanks a lot. I couldn't see clearly how your camera straps are attached to your cameras, but Rock n Roll camera straps come with thick, round, leather washers that really do isolate your camera body from the metal O-rings. If your O-rings are wearing on your camera, consider the Rock n Roll straps.
I use Barton straps www.barton1972.com
What a great video! Thanks. I have an M10p with a 35mm f2, 50mm f2, & 90mm f2 that I rarely use. I love that system. However, I ran into the weather problem. So I just invested in the Q2 reporter. Another M body wouldn't solve the problem amd the SL is another lens universe. Thanks for your video. I will subscribe.
Thanks for watching and thanks for the subscribe HP :).
I like the Leica CL small but perfectly formed…
How do you get your prints made….
I’m hoping to start printing my photos…. soon
I definitely need to try out that CL, people seem to love it. I use various printers around the world depending on where my orders from. I save money by printing and shipping locally.
It’s a really. Nice little camera I’ve been experimenting with vintage lenses and the photos, video are lovely form it…
Hi Justin, thanks for the reviews. I’m wondering where I can get a braided leather strap like yours. Thanks
Here you go Duane, company is called Barton 1972 www.barton1972.com
I love the shutter sound of the M10-P and was wondering how it compares to the Q2 since the Q2 has a leaf shutter.
All of them? 😊 I’m lucky enough to have all three and each serves a different purpose. Q for casual, quick point-and-shoot activities. M-D Typ 262 for street shooting and is pure joy to use, for many of the reasons why you prefer M10-D. SL2-S for serious, fast moving situations, plus nailing focus and slower shooting with M lenses. The only SL lens I have is the 24-90, which is spectacular. I had a couple SL primes, but found them too large for what they are, and I prefer adapting M lenses instead (35 Cron, 50 Lux).
I do not shoot professionally. All of my shots are for personal use. Going off my IG posts the M-D gets the majority of use.
Thanks for all your content. 👍🏼
Nice collection , that’s a great set up :). If I knew I was going to dive back into Leica a few years ado I might have gone w their S medium format over the Hasselblad for my commercial work but oh well I’m too deeply invested. I’m considering that SL2-s for video , it’s very tempting.
@@AskMOTT What about the Fuji GFX100S? Sell one Leica lens and get that for professional work. Lenses are rel. cheap too.
@@macmac8122 I see a lot of people extremely happy w Fujis and I'm not a camera pusher, I just like to talk about what works for me. I've used the Fuji system in the past and I just didn't like it nearly as much as the Leica's at all especially when it comes to build quality, design, and aesthetic. They are nice, don't get me wrong, I just prefer Leica, especially the M system.
I am torn between the Leica SL cameras.
SL - 24 MP / 11fps / 4K 24P / No IBIS
SL2S - 24 MP / 24 fps / 4k 60P / 5 axis IBIS
SL2 - 47MP / 20 fps / 4K 6P / 5 Axis IBIS (firmware 3)
Can the SL2 shoot less megapixels (without huge file size) whilst allowing 47 MP where required?
Easy. SL2S.
I have film M bodies, Epson Rd1 .. I just bought SL type 601. No idea what I will get from SL. It will be interesting :)
I started out with an M6 back in the film days until that was stolen and I bought an M6TTL. The TTL hasn't been as reliable electronically and my tip to anyone buying a film Leica, ancient or modern and expecting to use it for decades is to find one without batteries. These days I have an M10 and a Nikon system. I'm not sure about the direction Nikon has taken in the mirrorless world though so I'm giving the SL2S consideration. Money no object, I'd have a M10 Monochrom. Truth is you can make an equally beautiful B&W conversion from a Fuji and probably more conveniently but cameras are also tactile objects we spend long hours holding and Leica just feels right to me.
If you go w that SL2s let me know how you like. I plan to test it more and I'm strongly considering it for my video work.
How does braided leather strap compare to flat strap? About to get Q2
I love the braided one personally.
Justin, you talk about carefully deciding which Leica system one buys into. I bought into the CL system, and went to buy my second lens only to find out that Leica had killed the system and no stock left. Beware! Leica has yet to make any public announcement. Even to registered owners. Want to afford a Leica since 1975, having time in my retirement to spend many hours getting back into photography, I'm now completely screwed. I don't have the budget to start again on a new system and certainly do not have the trust.
Fair enough Gary, what a bummer they cancelled that system. I’ve always been wary of newish systems for that same reason :(
Discontinuing with the CL series digital Mirrorless is one of many stupid decisions made by Leica; and considering the flaws in the M11 upon launch proves that Quality Control is non-existent at Leica, considering that Leica is a luxury brand with a reputation and history, the C.E.O is utterly shameless for not having the highest level of Quality Control.
Nice episode. Fortunate to have all three. Not a pro. The SL2-S is my fav. Slap on a Voigtlander 35mm f2 or a summicron 35 or an elmarit 28 and it’s the ‘same’ volume as the Q but with interchangeable lens capability. At one point, may change either the Q or the M for another SL2-S. The stabilization and high ISO on the SL2-S makes it a viable platform to use tiny, small aperture lenses without compromising image quality.
I’ve been kicking back and forth the idea between the sl2s or the m10…it’s a big case of “if I get this one, I don’t get that feature from the other”. The thing that I like on the sl2s is the built in diopter. Wish the m10 had a built in diopter as well. As far as the m10 goes, has has the durability and reliability been for you?
@@Deetroiter The M10 is durable. Own it for three years now and still looks new after many trips and everyday use. Reliability is ok. The rangefinder is the weak point of the M-system. Had to send it back to Wetzlar once when the rangefinder drifted and the arm that interfaces the lens cam was getting sticky. Leica maintains and adjusts the camera for free (excluding shipping), once a year; but takes between 1-2 months to get it back. You can buy the Visoflex for it to get the diopter. There's still nothing like the M for compactness on a full frame mirrorless. Having said that, if I needed another SL2-S, I would sell the M immediately. To me, the SL2-S is still "the best M", even now that the M11 is out.
So are you using the SL2, and if so are you still using the Hasselblad X system? Even with all of its faults, I am in love with color science and image quality that comes out of the Hasselblad. Wondering how the SL2 compares.
Hello David, I just borrowed the SL2-S during lockdown and I’ve used it in the field , but I don’t own it. I use the X1D for all my commercial work and while I have some small issues w it , I like the system and will upgrade when the 3rd versions comes to market. I’m considering the SL2-S for video work , will think deeply about it.
Ah, you answered my question in the video. Thanks!
Cool channel and work Justin. So for someone that doesn’t have a M would you recommend a M10 or Q2? I’m on the fence. It looks like the M10R has better IQ and the interchangeable lenses. Just the manual focus is the challenge to overcome. What do you think between the 2?
It's such a personal preference thing Benoit, hard to say without knowing you better. I think if you need an all-around camera you can't go wrong w the Q2 or even the Q1. I am doing mostly long form documentary following subjects around for hours upon hours so the M10D is sort of perfect for me. I use the M10D for assignments as well but i could see the benefit of a Q at times w that autofocus, but I'm pretty good at manual focus at the moment.
@@AskMOTT I think the most difficult for me is manual focusing with vety shallow depth of field. like 1.4 (medium to close distance)
Anyone think the Q3 will have a 35mm? Should I wait before getting an M?
So hard to say Erik, on the one hand many people like you and me would prefer a 35mm option but the Q is such a success as is and appeals to a broader audience who prefers wider.
Excellent video. I found it extremely useful. Thank you.
Thank you, I appreciate you watching.
man... thank you SO MUCH!, I felt like you were talking to me, when mentioned coming out of the SONY menus hahaha (im currently a sony user). Very important what you said about the commitment and feel about a bigger camera compared to a small one, I just realize I dont want people to be aware that im present as a photographer, i jus wanna be a dude with a cool camera that takes stunning pics, and I i didn´t realize that was bothering me after I listen to you, right after i boughtt mi SONY A7III, I felt the weight of the camera and 2 more lenses and people thinking i was hired to take pics!. So I might go with a smaller camera in the near future, I dont know if Leica though, I love the design!, but I simply dont have the money for that. Again thank you so much for clarifying things!
Love your work would love to learn about ur color process
Just found your channel. Love it so far.
I appreciate that Chris , I’ve got some series in the pipeline so I’m interested to see how you like it .
@@AskMOTT I'm sure the algorithm showed me your channel because a) photography and b) Leica. But I am also interested in Hanoi, conservation, and your mix of photojournalism and fine art. So there's a lot in which I am interested.
@@AskMOTT I just saw your short about the M10-P (the one without the screen). I agree with how constraints force you to think things through. I have 12,000 negs shot with a Bessa R2a. Some of my best images. Obviously had no way to ‘preview’ anything. You just trust your craft and trip the shutter. I never felt limited.
Great comparison. I use the M (digital and film). Allows me to be part of the scene and "gets out of the way" when engaging with a subject. Quite unique in the industry. What I don't fully appreciate is the appeal of the SL relative to less expensive options from Canon and other manufacturers. Better images/experience?
I love my M10P and hope to keep it for a long time. Hopefully its sensor won't die like my old M9. Having said that Leica did give me a great trade in on my dead M9 to purchase the M10P.
That’s an awesome camera Peter, I’m sure you’ll have it for many years :).
The focus point selector on the SL and viewfinder is way better than anything else I have tried.
Autofocus and Leica is IMHO slow at best. You don’t want to even compare with a 5dMkIII, Nikon D300s, Fuji X100F.
I just bought an SL2-S with the 24-70 lens and love it so far. I’m thinking about a Q2 for travel. I’d love an M10, but just can’t justify the price (with lenses).
I do love my M6 for film shooting though.
Are you using the SL2-S for video, if so how do you find it ?
@@AskMOTT I don’t really shoot video, but I’ll probably try it out though.
I like the Leica SL but the weight and bulk is an issue to me since my use case is mainly for travel. I have in fact a Q2M and Q2 for travel use.
Is it better quality than the m10
Perfect Timing.
Shooting the Q2. It's a pretty awesome camera for the way I like to shoot...but it does take some time to get use to because of the 28mm lens. I was a little frustrated at first, but after about 1000 actuations everything just clicked.
That Q2 is pretty perfect but I definitely prefer 35 over 28 but w that sensor cropping to 35 isn’t an issue.
What about an M9 in 2021????
I love my TL2 , so under represented
No mention of the i-series and other L-mount lenses?
I’ve only used those 3 systems professionally and I only like to speak form experience.
Perhaps down the road I’ll explore those as well.
thanks for share, i am deciding Q2 or M10
Tough choice , depends on what and how you like to shoot.
Great video! Thank you!
Thank you Serge.
@@AskMOTT I am a big fan of your work. Thank you for sharing your experience with us.
I’m about to dive into the Leica world. Great video. I’m still not sure if I go SL2, S or Q2. If I go for the Q2 I’d have to keep my Fuji XH2S for sports and player portraits. But the SL2S could cover all the bases. It’s just that it’s a monster as you say!
I have the SL2-S…. It’s a beast compared to the other leica cameras, but it’s much smaller and compact compared to my canon system with L glass and full size bodies. While the R3 is for commercial sports work which I don’t use very much, everything else I prefer my SL2-S
@@Reportageandart I can see why, Jona. I bought the sl2s yesterday! For sports and video they said I’d probably get better results. We’ll see!
@@Reportageandart oh and I bought the q2 the day after I put this comment up!
@@touchtennis Nice! I actually have the SL2-S not the SL2 as previously mentioned (I corrected the comment), and I like the files a lot. Also great for video. I had the Q2 but I just sold it to buy the M10-R to compliment the times when I don't want to use the SL system... but in retrospect, the Q2 is an excellent option to complement the SL as they also share the same generation menu structure and the same batteries which is a big plus.
@@Reportageandart I wish I was good enough to use a range finder! Give me a few years! Those M cameras are so beautiful. So special to hold!
Great comparo Justin. Not many have had access to such a selection. Have you seen the new limited edition SL2-S Reporter? Should be called the SL2-S Safari. Sexy.
I stil use somehow a film Leica camera ,can not drop it away ,it's love and art 🎭🎨
I had them all, S, SL, CL and M. The CL is Leica best camera so far, the SL is simply to big and heavy, and the Q has the wrong focal length (for me)
I agree about the focal length, I prefer a 35mm. I should do a field test on that CL soon.
I wish I never sold my CL. That was a big mistake. It’s a remarkable camera.
@@AskMOTT I believe you would be surprised with the sensor`s dinamic range and the performance of some TL lenses
@@AskMOTT if you are a 35 mm guy, get the 23 mm Summicron with it, otherwise a M lens with the adapter.
@@webersteve1547 Thanks Steve :).
Would love to learn and talk about the SL system with M lenses on it more :)
Liked your very honest style. Thanks. Would like to have your one on one tuition some day..
You should, I have some openings next week if you're interested.
@@AskMOTT thanks but in future…
Soon be on board 🤩
Welcome :)
Great video!
Best Leica camera for family and everyday photos?
I’d say the Q is probably the best for that Andre, because of it’s size you’re more likely to have it with you at all times.
@@AskMOTT Been thinking a lot about this and reached to the same conclusion. However in that category (Q2) I always end up comparing it to X100V... pfff Thank you for your time! Keep up the good work.
A word on value: as a professional fashion photographer I’ve used different brands over a long period of time. Next to Hasselblad, Leica cameras and lenses are easily the best investment. Not only because you feel less need to upgrade, but even when you do, the resale value is great. Once invested in the Leica ecosystem it’s actually less costly than others. You are very right about the Fujifilm X-Pro’s. I’ve had all three models and although they’re good cameras, they only remotely resemble Leica M in looks. The retro-look is nice, but the handling and overall quality is nowhere near an M10. A few years ago we were in Iceland enjoying a day long drizzle. My spouse’s X-Pro3 failed even though the weather sealings, while my M10 had no issue at all. I know this is an n=1 experience, but also during professional use the Fujifilm cameras (I’ve had about 10 of them between 2012 and 2020) gave me frequent issues. Nice cameras, but you get what you pay for…
Shooting Leica M with M-E 240 and several film M cameras. Love the compactness, less the luxury prices. No intention nor need to add or move to the L-system (too bulky, no need for AF or video). What's missing in Leica's line is an interchangeable M-mount FF camera based on the Q-series with EVF and maybe IBIS. Only such camera I would consider adding to my existing M system.
Get that M6 back!
Don’t you shot Hasselblad anymore?
Hello Elton, I use the Hasselblad for all my commercial photography still and love it.
Nice, are you a Leica salesman? It's a very well made video - feels like I'm watching a teleshopping channel
Not at all but I’d love to get commission :). I’m just a fan of the product.
Leica M and Leica SL2S
I have the Leica Monochrom M10.
One my recent workshop participants was using that camera and he swears by it.
Still a lot of questions...
Seems like I need all of them)))
But thank you anyway
Ask away Mark, I’ll add them to my upcoming Leica mailbag.
if you could do leica T systemtoo that would be great
I’ll definitely try Maciej.
Why they have to be so different ?
nice video
why does nobody talk about Leica S system?
I’d like to test it out at some point Alberto.
From QP graduating to Q2..
I am Vietnam
Nice to mee you Vietnam :)
Justin, do yourself a favour and stick a Leica Summilux R 50mm f/1.4 E60 on your SL2S.
Can you properly level the audio of your intro? My ears were shocked 😅. Anyways, good comparison. Thanks for the vid
Those were my old videos Karl, I’ve sorted all that out now and sorry about your ears.
Leica M2
I live in vietnam
The Q is not a “System”
Do you ever take a breath?
Who’s got time ?Ha ha , I’ve slowed down significantly in my newer videos .
None, just poor mans Leicas.
My Lumix GX880 with the Lumix / Leica15mm f1.7 Summilux .. Small, light and fast.
I love the way that only 4k is dropped into the bit on price.
I’m in Saigon. I’ll work for free!
Gr3
I shoot with M10 Monochrome, Sl2s, Sl2, M6 Titan 😵💫🤦🏼♂️
Damn Eddie, you've got quite the arsenal there :).
SL...SL...SL...
It is a great system Vijay, but I'm an M guy :).
Leica, Leica, Leica… The summer of Leica continues. Their marketing department must be working overtime with RUclipsrs. But I will be fair here, I’m pretty sure you’re one of the few who would use Leica and make videos about Leica, just because. Others though, not so much. Since the beginning of June Leica has been all over the RUclips photography world. RUclipsrs who previously had barely mentioned Leica before and had championed the likes Sony, Canon or Fuji all of a sudden mention how much they dig Leica. Again, this comment isn’t to denigrate you or your videos, which are pretty stellar… I just got triggered by seeing “Leica”, yet again, in a video title.
The Leica M system was a huge fail and a waste of money for me. If you buy any of the nice lenses like the 75 Noctilux, it blocks half the view finder making it extremely difficult to focus. Yes you can add the Visioflex like I did but then you loose the hot shoe for flash trigger. So no professional portraits with that setup! You’re lucky if you can get half your money back on resale, so I has to get an SL 2 for the 75 Noctilux…… I really think the m system is for street shooters doing reportage with a 35mm…. Like it has always been used in the past, or hobbyists on vacation.
There are bugs on it
I’m shooting leica since the late 70’s till now . The M10 / M lenses and Leica Q Monochrom is the best combo . I had the SL and lenses but too big / bulky and did not have a leica feel at all ( small , light , simple) just like any modern camera in market you can buy so I sold them , the Panasonic S system and leica SL so similar and more affordable if you can afford to buy SL .
that dslr shape that the leica SL features is no necessary,especially it adds more weight and space.
Quite large but great for video.
It is intended to be a professional tool, with top notch build quality, full weather sealing and world class lens system. Relatively speaking, the build quality of all Leica camera bodies are heavier than other manufacturers.
@@clawdawg7248 No doubt for leica machining quaility.The lens is heavy because it use more glass.But still heavy for an mirrorless.
@@sigmagamer364 We’ll have to agree to disagree. The Canon R5 ($3,900) and Sony Alpha 1 ($6,500) are less than 100g lighter, and many prefer the ergonomics of the Leica over both. The just announced Canon R3 ($6k) is the same weight. These are professional mirrorless comparisons.
@@clawdawg7248 yeah but that zoom lens for leica is even pulling the camera down.
Do you ever breathe, or no?
Rarely , I should start scuba diving :).
Why do you talk like a computer voice?
Because I’m a computer , why do you type like a human ?
Interesting, but PLEASE talk slower…
My newer videos I’ve slowed down :).
20 minutes too long. This should be edited down to like 5 min tops….
Thanks, any other pro tips for me?