"Contemporary" Evidence of Chanakya? | Q&A #3
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 июн 2024
- Third Q&A video where I answer some of your questions.
Chapters:
0:00 Intro
0:08 How Ancient Indian texts are dated?
3:36 Why Megalithic Burials are in Southern India not in Northern India?
5:43 Why Mauryans didn't conquer Northeastern India?
10.28 Did Bow and Arrow was replaced in Ancient Indian warfare after the Vedic Period?
12:08 Why Satavahanas are considered Post-Mauryans?
14:55 Evidence of Pre-Mauryan Brahmi.
16:19 Views on the Series “The History and Culture of the Indian People”
18:23 What will we find from unstudied Ancient Manuscripts?
23:01 Sati in Ancient India
26:23 Diet during Mauryan times
28:28 Who is Sandrocottus of Greek and Roman sources?
32:50 Was Piyadasi the real name of Ashoka?
35:27 Which Period of Indian History would I like to visit?
37:01 Who was Sophagasenus?
38:37 "Contemporary” evidence of Chanakya
40:43 Book recommendations?
42:57 Apology and end.
Spotify
open.spotify.com/show/6NJcBvG...
Follow me on Twitter
/ jayvtweets
Follow me on Goodreads
/ jay-vardhan
Maps Images used in the video are made by me and are subject to copyright.
Images are sourced from :-
commons.wikimedia.org/
This guy talks about history without any agenda
He quotes verses of veda and puranas as historical references😂
@@ankit1rawat actually many historical family we know in history all because of scriptures of Buddhism, Jainism and Hinduism
I mean almost all historians do so what ?..@@ankit1rawat
We will know only when he starts about muslim invaders
Ghanta
So much to learn with everyone’s questions! 🙌🙌
Chanakya is mentioned in the texts like Arthashastra, Kalhan's Rajtarangini, Kalidasa's Abhigyan Sakuntalam, Visakhadatt's Mudrarakshas, Buddhist texts Vinayapitaka, Angutarnikaya and Mahavamsha (from Sri Lanka), Jain texts Bhagwati Sutra, Vishnu Purana, Kathasarit Sagar etc.
False absolutely false
@@Sramana358 How ! Can you prove how this is false? Or only you know how to write false everywhere.
@@Sramana358 lower caste🤮
@@DharmMarg-gw5pc I checked only one of the books you listed , Rajtarangini, and your contention is absolutely false. Typical myth making mentality , pulling stuff from thin air.
Mil gya questions ka answer... chanakya mere liye bhagwan h bhaiya aap great h... mujhe Jo answer chahiye tha mil gya 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
chankya is kalpanik
@@ritikkhurana3350 chanakya is real, vo 200 bc k panchatantra se lekr jain hindu baudh teeno k grantho me mentioned h plus usey kadamba k raja ne apne inscription me mention kiya h, sare historians usey real mante h
@@ritikkhurana3350 chanakya ka arthshastra mauryakalin h ye bat german scholars ne apni research me prove bhi ki h
agli bar tumse koi bole ki chanakya fictional h to usey ye points bta dena jo mene is gadhe ko btaye h jo unko fictional kh rha h, chanakya real h koi historian unhe fictional nhi manta, ambedkarwadi unko fictional khte h kyuki vo brahmano se jalte h, ab to ye log aryabhatta varahmihir etc brahmano ko bhi fiction bolne lgey h lol
I mean you believe In flying monkeys so the bar is very low to convince you of stupid things.
Disclaimer: History ki Rakhi Sawant(Ruchika Sharma) wasn't harmed in this video.
3 degree karke bhi aapne bable dikha kar views mangti hain 😂😂😂
@@anchitbose4151💀
@@anchitbose4151 bruh 💀🙏
@@anchitbose4151Baat shi hai 😂💀
@@anchitbose4151i thought this channel's viewers were nice and well mannered
Thank you for answering my question
Such detailed information. Thanks for sharing your knowledge
Very informative video. Appreciate if the books in the shelves behind you could be made clear in the videos. Thank you.
Best channel for history
thanks a lot for detailed response
Conspiracy theories destroyed in this video -
1) Ancient Indians did not eat meat .
2) The baseless claim that sandrocottus is Chandragupta 1st .
3) Another baseless claim that Chanakya is a fake character .
Ancient Indian did eat meat as found from Indus Valley Remains.
Meat was common in ancient times
@@MRSINGH.OFFICIALAncient India did not only comprise of Indus Valley civilisation, it ranges till the end of Harshavardhana empire . Moreover whether we do not have solid evidences , there is still a chance that Indus Valley civilisation people would have a meat diet due to its time period .
@@MRSINGH.OFFICIALwhich evidences are there about the meat eating by Indus Valley Civilisation???
Meat at any place or time in history 85% of indian where non vegetarian
V, knowledgeable video
Is Vikramaditya of Ujjain a fictional character or a historical personality? What archaeological and literary evidence is there related to him? Can his coins or inscriptions be found? Did his contemporary kings write about him?
asli vikramaditya gupta samrajya k Chandragupta 2 hi they, numismatic expert sanjiv kumar ne ispr ek research paper bhi publish kiya h
@@Shubhamkumar-fr9hlthere was definitely a local rular of malva who ruled from ujjain and had name of vikramaditya , the chandragupta second of Gupta Empire lately adopted the allready famous title.
@@nopek1405 pr malwa wala vikramaditya jyada famous nhi tha aur usne koi bda kam nhi kiya, legendary vikramaditya mostly Chandragupta 2 based h plus unke potey skandagupta pr bhi unhone bhi vikramaditya title use kiya tha plus legendary vikramaditya ki kuch stories Samudragupt se bhi related h
@@Shubhamkumar-fr9hl ha,pata hai bhai ki vikramaditya tittle famous karne ka kaam chandragupt द्वितीय ne kiya tha,
lekin vo title pre guptan tha, vikram era start hone ki wajah bhi wahi malwa ke local vikramaditya tha jiski shako yaani western kshatraps par victory ke kaaran ye era continue kiya.
Gupto ke time pe bhi vikram era continue ho raha tha central india k inscription me jabki gupto ne khud ka Gupt era start karwaya tha.
Ye batata tha ki Gupt se pahle bhi ek vikramaditya jarur tha,vo alag baat hai ki history me bahut se cheejon ke bahut kam sakshya milte hai isliye speculate bhi karna padta hai.
@@nopek1405 malwa k ruler vikramaditya ne shako ko nhi haraya aur most probably vikram samvat ka nam phle kuch aur tha Chandragupta 2 ne iska nam vikram samvat kiya tha aesa most historians ka manna h
Sir please make videos in hindi as well....love your videos...❤❤❤
Battle of Rajasthan and chola expedition of south east Asia
There are numerous site in tamil nadu wer tamil brahmi predate ashokan brahmi.
1)Kodumanal potshed wer inscribed with tamil brahmi, the rice inside pot radiocarbon dated to 490BC,
2) azhagankulam potshed with tamil brahmi dated to 350BC, Its officially statement give by ASI in madurai high court in 2019.
3) keezhadi yeild numerious potshed bearing tamil brahmi dating from 600BC.
4) korkai dated 800BC and potshed bear tamil brahmi.
5) sivakalai and adichanallur burial pot bear tamil brahmi, ter skeleton bone wer radiocarbon dated to 800BC-600BC
6)porunthal,mayiladumparai, palani, perunagai, wer also obtained potshed dates to 600BC-400BC.
7) pulimankombai found with ancient tamil brahmi hero stone inscription dates to 500BC.
8)Tissamaharama also found with tamil brahmi potshed and inscription 200BC.
You can check youself
I dont think any of these have scholarly consensus and only one ( from SriLanka ) has been published in a peer reviewed journal.
Tamils got Tamil brahmi script from Jains
That's it
Hunger gatherers impossible to create a script
Then why did jains came to hunter gatherers place @@Agnostic7773..
Pls make a video on gods that were being worshipped during mauryan and pre mauryan period
Dada please make a video about different schools of historiography and how they see history.
Share it to all bhimtas .
bhimto ko bolo buddha ka contemporary source dikhaye plus unse kho agar buddh itna mahan tha to Alexandre k sath aye greeks aur megasthenes ne uske bare me kyu nhi likha, plus ab to asi ne bhi apne report me kh dia h ki buddha ka koi archaeological evidence nhi mila🤣😂
@@Shubhamkumar-fr9hl evidence h uska uske relics toh pass on hote rehte g
@@ishaanrohmetra3447 un relics ki dna report aa gyi h, vo relics human k nhi h, animals ki haddiya h vo
@@ishaanrohmetra3447 aur kuch relics like katora etc buddha se hi related h iska bhi koi praman nhi h
@@ishaanrohmetra3447 buddha ka koi archaeological evidence relic etc nhi mila jo sabit krey vo buddh se related h archaeological survey of India ne ye bat apne report me khi h
I have two questions, 1. the akkadian inscription of king Rimush mentions the a combat with the troops of meluha. Is this a reference to the Sarasvati Sindhu civilization? 2. Are pallavas of the ancient south India related to the Persian pahalava clan in any way?
Chanakya was a character from book *Mudra Rakshas*
Do we have a book on military science from ancient or medieval India as there is De Re Militari from ancient Rome?
Please make one full episode on Solanki (chalukya) dynesty of Gujarat !
Bro Plz make a detailed video on Kashmir ...❤❤❤❤
First view,like and commented🗿
13:55 . also brahmi of the naneghat inscription of naganika and kharabela"s inscription are same or almost similar . then the inscription mentions dimita which is most probably demetrius 1 or 2 . so 1st century bce seems plausible .
s u derinyagala wrote a paper about the brahmi inscriptions of anuradhapura dated to 500 600 bce . plz say something on this
Excellent again Jay. Can you let us know your take on recent news on Poompuhar in Tamil Nadu. Is it possible to have such a big city at the end of ice age as they are claiming?
I am waiting for the report of ASI. As of now, I haven't read any papers on it. So, can't say for sure.
In line number 12, of Hathigumpa inscription. King Kharvel made Magadha King Brihaspatimitra/Pushmitrasunga worship his feet. In line numbger 9, King Kharvel worshipped the stupa. This is written in Kharvel's Hathigumpa inscription.
Hello Jayavardhan ji😂
Question: the people from Andhra pradesh and Telangana strongly believe that they are descended of Shatavahan dynasty. Is there any historical truth to this claim.
When trying to expose someone and instead get yourself exposed....😂😂😂😂
what do you mean?
@@Shubhamkumar-fr9hl he is showing that he doesn't have brain
Seems I missed the chance to get my question answered.
But for the next Q&A. Why is there seemingly such a lack of written historical material usable in history from India compared to the rest of the world. In the Ancient Era especially but the Medieval Era as well to a lesser extent.
Why is much more of Indian history done using archeological sources, including written in stone sources compared to the West and Islamic world?. Why is the history of several Indian major states like the Mauryans done using external written sources and archeological evidence upon the antiquity of writing on the Indian Subcontinent.
Thank you for mentioning MASKI of Raichur dist of K'taka with respect to the name Asoka of that emperor.
His stone sculpture with name Asoka is again found in K'taka.The place name is Sannati-Kanaganahalli,Yadgir dist K'taka.There is a Buddhist stupa in Sannati-Kanaganahalli and also Ashokan stone inscription.
Why are not uploading any video in historically speaking channel? Will you only upload in this channel?
Yes, I am not uploading on the HS as I am quite busy with my PhD and this RUclips Channel. But soon, you will videos on the podcast channel as well.
Can you study about keeladi and make a video on it?!
A video or videos on Ramayan and Mahabharat time States needed from you very much Brother i/we need clarification about the states or the regions which existed then and now what they are known as ..like SHALYA who was mama of Pandavas but he has to drive the chariot of Karna. We know SHALYA was master at chariot and why his state was referred as "Mleccha desh".
I have come to know that the names Chanaka and Chapada are found in some inscriptions and Buddhist texts.
Why buddhist and jains sources mention him 😂 ???
Hey you didn't answered any of my questions 😢
Where's contemporary evidence of BUDDHA?
Delhi museum me hai Buddha ke evidence lekin kisi kalpanik god ke evidence nahi hai
@@PB-uw9do jhoot to mt bol delhi museum me jo relics h buddha k unka unka buddha se koi lena dena nhi h ye bat ASI apni report me bta chuki h spammer
@@PB-uw9do 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣kbhi gya h delhi museum 🤣 contemporary ka mtlb pta h tujhe?!
@@aaryan_B055tuje bahut pata hai na contemparory evidence ke bare to kisi kalpanik god ka evidence dikhao.asi ne kisi kalpanik god ka sabut kyu nahi Diya.
@@PB-uw9do
Abe gdhe....pehle kalpanik buddha ka to contemporary evidence de. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 God to bhot duur ki baat h
31:00 why did he moved from "compared to" to "relative to"
because compare is not the best word to be used here, as we are comparing one script relative to the other and we have to keep the context in mind.
👀
is pali derived from Sanskrit or its other way around?
Pali is corruption of sanskrit
that's is what all foreign and indian sources say but new Neo buddist say that Sanskrit came from pali@@Agnostic7773
@@rollno-123biswajitsukla5Almost all linguists accept that pali has derived from Sanskrit and Neo Buddhists are not scholars so ignore them .
Modern scholarship doesn't consider the existence of a second Sātakaṇi.
I may be wrong but I sense you are rightly critical about Buddbist text but not of Hindu.
did the ancient ibdian armies have medics or doctors for the troops and vetenarians for the horses and elephants when they get hurt or sick.
If you don't mind I would like to recommend researching a bit about kallaripaytu a form of martial arts and how warriors were taught to heal there bodies, it's interesting topic.
Yes they did , they are mentioned in arthashastra of kautilya and numerous others.
@@alpha-vs1fx Similarly mentioned in Mahabharata's Bhishmaparv. There was rule that no warrior will harm such medics.
@@s01224 yes true that also.
0:24 hello mr. Jay vardhan, My name is Saddam. And I belong to Pakistan. I have a bachelor's degree in information technology. Exploring old archaeological sites is my hobby. You won't believe me. But I have a place in Batkhela city of Malakand district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan. whose name is Kalito Banda. At this place, I saw the image of Padmavati, Krishna and Professor Chankya carved on a huge stone. I am sending you the original picture of that stone. And on this stone I see human figures. And builder rock picture will send you again, but i will highlighting those faces of human.
talking about contemporary evidences, there is not a single contemporary evidence for lord buddha too, does it mean he was mythical?
Raise this question to government of India and ASI and file a RTI asking for proof of Buddha.
@@TruthSlap9 asi ne apne document me btaya h buddha ka koi bhi archaeological evidence nhi mila plus historians like charles allan ne jb buddh ki astio ka paleontologists se dna test kraya to pta lga ye pashuo ki astia h
@@TruthSlap9 tum chaho to me tumko vo asi ka document share kr dunga
@@Shubhamkumar-fr9hlBuddha ki document sanatan samiksha dikhata hai vo fake hai.sanatan samiksha ke pas khudke grandfather ke father ka evidence pucho to vo nahi dega to sanatan samiksha ke grandfather ke father kalpanik hoge kya.vo sirf Buddha ko badnam karta hai kyunki uske kalpanik god ka evidence sanatan samiksha ke pas nahi hai.
@@Shubhamkumar-fr9hllekin chanakya ka koi evidence nahi hai sirf books me hai vo fake books hai jabardasti chanakya ka character dikhaya hai
Sangam literture not just have poem for mauryan chariot in some poem it mentioned chola illencheziyan formed confedaration with chera,pandiya and all tamil vassals to fight against mauryans, in another poem it mentioned chola illencheziyan defeated mauryan in place called vallam . And another poem mentioned malayamman vassal of chera defeated aryan intrustion. In another poem it mentioned kosar which lost to aryan recovered by tamil confedaration. And also the pushed aryan far.
All wer different poem written by differnt poet.
Wow!!! What a great distortion.!!! It was battle between two or more kings not the racial or civilisational war??
malmunar k poems me mauryans ka mention h jo chariots se aa rhe they
@@Shubhamkumar-fr9hl definitely. I am not denying that at all. I am only asking whether Mauryans are identified as racially and religiously different and foreigners??? No they are not. Chola themselves built the most magnificent temples so it was not civilisational war.
@@vikranthalkandar4178 that's not the same cholas of mouryan period it was the mideaval cholas who build those magnificent temples, from these poems we can understand they find the mouryans as outsiders who were trying to invade them, which makes sense cause they did had different language, culture and tradition back then
@@anaesthete5592 again distortion!!! Do you have evidence which is sufficient to prove your statement that 1. Mauryans were of different culture, traditions and of racial different??? 2. Is there sufficient evidence for us to conclude that Mauryans were Mauryans empire??? There is only one reference of Mauryans chariot but can we take such great leap of imagination to say that they were conquering and were eager to defeat the Tamilians and they were culturally and racially different??? And medical Cholas? Really? If they constructed the temples then definitely they were following Hinduism.
According to science all Humans have common origin, so there is a lot of ancient common culture. Humans reached South India first.
Make a detailed video on the pros and cons of Marxist historiography and why is it so controversial???
In gupt coin , is it समुद्रगुप्त or समदगुपत
Samudragupt h vo, ambedkarwadi befizul me usko samadgupat bolte h ye unka propaganda h
समुद्रगुप्त होता है । समदगुपत कोई शब्द है ही नहीं। जो कहते है कि समदगुपत है तो उनसे पूछो कि समदगुपत कहां लिखा है और उसका अर्थ क्या होता है और उसका व्युत्पत्ति पूछो।
@@NishantKumar-ry9rp
Coins me likha hai
Agar brahmi script aati hai to dekh lo
हिंदी मे क्यों नहीं ?
Wow he did what I asked for 😂😂😂
Contemporary Avidence of buddha?
Thank you sir, it was such an informative video, I am soo sorry for being late, but I want to ask you sir, that I am a Masters student of Ancient Indian History Culture & Archaeology, But still I am struggling to find out that what is the correct way to understand the history of a particular time period, how to know various debates and discussions surrounding a particular period or a particular topic.
How you have studied Ancient Indian History ?
15:10 It should be termed *"Tamili"* not _Tamil brahmi._ Jain texts _pannavana sutra_ and _samavayanga sutra_ lists Damili besides Brahmi among the *then prevailed 18 scripts!*
============================
A smaller list of eighteen ancient Indian lipi is found in the Prakrit texts of Jainism (spelled as lipi sometimes[53]), such as the Pannavana Sutra (2nd century BCE) and the Samavayanga Sutra (3rd century BCE).[11][30] This list shares some names found in the Buddhist lists of ancient Indian scripts, but includes new names. The Jaina script list includes Brahmi at number 1, Kharosthi at number 4, but includes Javanaliya and others not found in the Buddhist lists.[11] Scholars such as Buhler state that the Jaina list of ancient Indian scripts is likely older than the Buddhist list, but still belonging to the second half of the 1st millennium BCE wherein Javanaliya probably is the same as one of the many Sanskrit scripts called Yavanani, which was derived from the Greek (Yavana) alphabet.[11] The Jaina canonical texts list the following writing scripts in ancient India:[54]
Brahmi
Javanaliya (Greek)
Dosapuriya
Kharosthi
Pukkharasariya
Bhogavaiya
Paharaiyao
Amtarikariya
Akkharaputthiya
Venaiya
Ninhaiya
Amka-livi
Ganita-livi
Gamdhavva-livi
Ayamsa-livi
Mahesari
Damili
Polimdi
Were Gupta's hindus ?? Did sanskrit exist during gupta time
Whats written in gupta coins
Example - समुद्रगुप्त or समदगुपत
Whay are old inscriptions sanskritized in texts??
😂😂😂😂😂 like wtf man!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
arey haa bhai guptas hindu they unke inscriptions aur coins me Sanskrit h bus aur guptas ki official language Sanskrit thi aur unhone multiple jagah khudko vishnubhakt btaya h
@@Shubhamkumar-fr9hl in jaise gadhe ko jawab na dena hi accha hein. Inko jawab dekar aap khushi atmasamman ko niche kar rahe ho.
Gupta period se Purane sanskrit ke evidence mil jaate hai aur gupta dynasty Hindu hi thi . Kuch gupta Raja agar Buddhist aur jain rahe honge toh alag baat hai par adhiktar toh ullekh yahi milta hai ki wah Hindu the .
Whether Chanakya and Koutilya one and the same?
When Was Chanakya or koutilya first mentioned in any writing?
We won't ask "contemporary" evidence.
I have discussed this topic in this podcast. You can listen to it here.
ruclips.net/video/G7Y4psKkzuE/видео.html&ab_channel=HistoricallySpeaking
@@JayVardhanSingh 🙏🙏🙏
Were south indians not vedic?
Especially tamils??
no, even north was not vedic, only some portion were vedic specially the region of pak and afganistan
tamils were vedic, great chola emperor rajendra chola was expert in vedas
@@mittusharma3824 Gangetic plains? Avanti janpad?
@@Shubhamkumar-fr9hl I Asked ancient tamils
@@Mani-my8ob ancient tamils know about vedas and they followed some vedic rituals too u can read sangam literature texts, ancient south indian kings like satvahans performed yagyas i don't were ancient tamil kings also performed yagyas or not
Good analysis of subject but i think still this person is slightly biased towards hinduism.❤ It will better he sheds these perseption he will be best.❤
सर,हिंदी में ही सवाल & जबाब का शो करो.
He has a Hindi channel
Hello sir, can you please make a video on hindusim vs budhisim vs jainism and which one is older with evidence?
Vedic aryanism. There was no such thing called hindu dharma in ancient india
Hinduism (Vedism) > Jainism > Buddhism
Ofcourse Hinduism is older. Infact Hindu word has older evidence than Buddhism.
someone ask about manusmirti talk about tripatak
someone asked chanakaya evidence ask him samkalin evidence of ashok
bhimta are logical less ass
I tried to do some of the research on whether sandrocottus is chandragupta 1 or chandragupta maurya.
Ashoka kandahar inscriptions tlk about yavans in his army. But to notice , there's nowhere written that yavan and yunani(greeks) were sam. Yavan clan existed even in mahajanapada era. It means people beyond north western india and did not follow vedic culture.
Also about mentioning of ptolemy and different kings in greek language in kandahar inscriptions: these are written in two languages, greek on top and armic at bottom. Aramic is quite older script than greek. Also the greek written there is initially quite thinner as it was done to fit in the left over space. Similar things are done at allahabad inscription of ashoka where Samudragupta later added his achievements.
Though it requires a lot of research to find the real truth. I will like you to go through it again . Also do read an article on this by bharatbhumi on google. You shall find it. Please reconsider it!!
agar guptas ne greeks se fight ki hoti to vo iss bat ko apne inscription me mention krte,pr aisa kuch nhi h
Neo Buddhists kya karenge ab ?
Kya hume jeene ka adhikar nahi hai ?
Ab kya karu mai marr jau 😅
Evidence to dia ni😂😂
@@amandmx ? Means Chanakya was Fake ?
❤️
@@amandmx ha tumahara Buddh ka evidence do ki o enlighten huin, Hum vi enlighten hein, Mein to dekh raha hu tum cutiye ho
Pura video dek. Contemporary evidence chandragupta ke bhi nahi hai. Iska matlab ye nahi ke vo fake hai.
😂😂came here for comteplorary evidence guy saying no contemplorary evidence of chanakya aka vishnugupta,kautilya
There is no evidence of chanakya and claim that he influenced chandragupt Maurya is tell tale story of jenevudhari s. There is no evidence of chanakya in any of mauryan ruins, writing s or inscription s. Mauryan s are the pioneer s in converting India (down below ganga) from a wild forest to agricultural and artisans land. Jenevudhari s arrive on mainstream after defeat of jaina, buddha and shaiva kings in the hands of Muslim trader/invaders. Post 9th century AD, Jenevudhari s made use of patent right of avtara and appropriated indian indigenous deities in the name of avtara (patent right given by adi shankaracharya of 9th century AD).
Congratulations 🎉🎉. Now Ambedkar's adopted donkeys haven defeated real donkeys in intellect and rationality.
Chankya to tb hoga jb Hinduism hoga phle Hinduism or sanskrit ka hi evidence dede agr chankya hota to mauryan or guptas ko bhul ku gye😂 unhe to angrezo ne khoja even unke inscription v angrezo ne pdhe brahmno ko kucj b pta ni tha yaha k bare mr agr pta hota to angrez na btate 😂😂😂 islie chankya peda kis taki pol na khul jaye tv serial ne famous kia chankya ko us time koi janta tk v ni tha ancient time ka kuch v pta ni but bamno ko chankya ka pta tha wah😂 or mauryan pali pakit bolte the naki sanskrit us time thi v ni😂😂😂 fir kaha se aagya chankya
Mtlb newyork exist krta h to to spider man vv krta h 🤡
We were world's oldest democracy and
Keep believing nonsense...
Democracy is a shit concept which allows captialists to exploit people by funding government
Archaeologists can only become true historians, others can just peddle histories according to their whims. Period
Archaeologist aur historian alag hote hai. Archaeologist ka kaam excavation karna aur artefacts ka study karna hai jabki historian har ek historical source ka study karta hai aur historical source kewal archaeology nahi hai balki literature , numismatic evidence , folktales and folklores , photographs and videographs , Rock paintings , yah sab hoti hai . Agar bas archaeological evidence ko history manoge toh 50 % se jyada history khatam ho jayegi 😂 .
Chandragupt mauryan sakya gad k hi the bad me piplivan k mauryan kahlaye wo phle se hi rulers the jahil thoda to pdh lia kr
The notion of Sangham literature and its antiquity itself is highly controversial.Tamilians may be 200% sure about Sangham period and its literature but a dispassionate literary historian would find the evidences for this sangham period quite problematic and scanty.
That's why it is dated between 300bce to 300 ce. Cuz nobody would just wake up and start writing in palm leaf manuscripts sir.
You said history before mourya there is no evidence, this means there is no historical and achiological evidence of veda's and Vedic period😅.
Unhone person ka kaha hai naa ki kisi period ka 🤣. Ved pahle the iske ek nahi balki kayi evidence hai aur abhi haal me hi rajashthan me khudai me 2500 yagya vedi bhi mili hai aur yah news lagbhag har news articles me chapa hai aur usse purane bhi yagya vediyo aur yagyashala ke avshes mil jaate hai aur boghazkoi inscription bhi ek evidence hai ki ved minimum 1500 BCE purane hai .
Talking about Punjabi history without saying Punjab LOL
Chanakya has no reference or evidence but Chandergupta does. Greeks wrote about him. That’s contemporary. What’s not present is evidence if Chandergupta really ruled Magdha. Dubious affiliation of Palibhotta with patna doesn’t explain many other history holes. Chandergupta was Punjabi that is contemporary.
😂😂😂
Chanakiya is a madeup fake charector
Al jazeera ko subscribe kar rakha hai tune = Opinion rejected☑️
Just like Budda
@@The_Sword_saint2.0trt news ko bhi double deshdrohi.
Spitzer manuscript has arthshastra copy
भाई ये वीडियो हिन्दी में आनी चाहिए
did you forget Megasthnies and his Indica? this is the contemporary evidance of Chandragupt maurya and it doesn't have any mention of chankya and kotilya.
No, I didn't forget it. I am particularly referring to Indian sources here. Also, we have to remember that original Indica doesn't survive, we have only excerpts.
indica me buddha aur buddhisto ka mention nhi h plus usme kyi ajib prani like ulte leg wale human bina nose wale human mentioned h hum megasthenes ki sari bate nhi man skte, cross check krna hoga uski bato ko
indica me buddha aur buddhisto ka mention nhi h plus usme kyi ajib prani like ulte leg wale human bina nose wale human mentioned h hum megasthenes ki sari bate nhi man skte, cross check krna hoga uski bato ko
Nila Nila kabhutar fur fur
@@Shubhamkumar-fr9hlbro I have a question that hare krishna mentioned in indica as "heracleus"