When my girlfriend at the time started college, one of her classes was Evolutionary psychology and David Buss had written the book she had for that class...reading that completely opened my eyes
@@kiralight6661 this whole entire study was absolutely manipulated by the human male to feed his ego nothing more than that this guy's nothing but a bullshitter
I don't hear anything funny, and don't understand why people are laughing like they're at stand up comedy. Very valuable information for us ladies. Be extremely discerning in your mate selection.
@@DebNKY i see what you mean, and I do agree. I also do think in this context its kinda like the lion joking about eating the gazelle. The lion thinks it's funny and then is confused that the gazelle does not laugh. You know?
When parents give THE talk to their children, it should be along those lines. It could save their life, or at least their happiness. Mating is a very practical matter, but it is often presented in an useless way.
He took a phenomena that women do “think they are hot” and projected it onto men😂. It is more sad than lol. As he is supposedly a representative of the highest level of his subject and its domain
Boy, he ain't kiddin'. Men see what they want to see, and they are wrong 90% of the time. This is why women live in fear; they can't even be nice to someone without aggression. Definition of aggression: forcing someone to do what they don't want to, on any level, especially when you have willfully ignored what they are telling you.
Profoundly abnormal, no doubt. And (as long as this society keeps going in the same direction as it does nowadays) you´ll be getting more, and more, abnormal with each passing day.
@Language and Programming Channel Marriages are very normal in a society. It is basically the way society balances the wants of both sexes inter and intra competition.
@@emilian7052 Even Hunter Gather societies tend to have some sort of pair bonding. The breaks from that tend to be in highly ritualized contexts. Maybe Marriage as the West does it now is "unnatural" but the basic thing taht when it appears in other cultures we will call "marriage" is.
@Language and Programming Channel Idk bruv they be jeolousy out there so idk how Harems are normal The best way I can describe it is a polyamourus but monogamous society. Monogamous only when humans see a key factor of a beneficial long term partner and polyamourus only on the occasion.
In my mind it's the only right thing to do. It's all too shallow and unreliable. Why would I risk my time and emotional investemnt in a person that can decide to leave at any point? Also why would I do the same to someone else? It's very cruel and I don't feel like participating in the game at all. Nature is pretty cruel.
Over perception bias I would argue is a natural component of the mating process given the obvious numbers men must pursue in order to achieve what they desire.
Literally a common trope that the man cheats and lives his wife for a new woman and relationship. This trope simply doesn’t exist for women. It’s not solid data but we both know this trope which says enough. You sound silly.
@@ТатьянаРохасI should’ve just read your comment because you destroyed their logic so succinctly. Even if you consider only single women this would mean women often have short term relationships too lmao.
Well, this was a lot of insightful stuff about mating, and that's very important, but partnering up for life is also about sharing and nurturing. Having some common interests and values. 2 people can *reinforce* each other that way, with each one having the other's happiness at heart.
I've never cheated, but I've been cheated on by at least half of my girlfriends. So either the women are lying about whether they are cheating, or I'm really good at wooing women out of my league who then proceed to realize that fact.
@Status DMG Like I said Buss and his followers are just aggrandized teenage boys who push the same "biotruth" narrative to rationalize their immaturity.
She is yours for as long as you stay a desirable man, if she leaves you it's either because you lucked out with her in the first place or your just not a good man, at least anymore.
Curious, what is this business about someone being an "8" wanting "10's"? Where does Prof. Buss have a list of these rankings and the definition of what constitutes an "8" or a "10" and so forth? Would appreciate help if someone could direct me to a book or essay the Professor has written about this subject.
@@Johnny_Savage Well then, your statement begs the question, who is a "10" and who's not. Buss states that "10's" are more likely to cheat on a mate that is not a "10", so it might be helpful to know who you're hooking up with. I also have to say that this guy has a unique talent for pointing out the obvious: After reams and reams of research, he concludes that rich men are more attractive to women. Jeeves, quick! My smelling salts! Something a lot of hapless males have known for centuries.
Usually in studies regarding attractiveness, there is one or one group of researchers who assigns these ratings (1-10) to all individuals in the study, following some metric. Dr David Buss' book The Evolution of Desire might be a good place to start.
It's impossible to discern that bc people have different predernces. Part of the absurdity of the entire thing. I mean ranking people into numbers like this should make anyone uncompfortable without the point that it's bs in acccuracy but okay
too bad that he didn't address mate guarding and paternity uncertainty. that 2-3% false paternity rate sounds dubious, given the large minority of women, per one study, who admitted they would conceal outside paternity from their partner.
Exactly, but what he didn't address is that modern women have the pill, so you wouldn't expect the rate to be big at all. But given the data, it's more likely that his hypothesis is correct.
David Buss forgot to take into account factors of the civilization, when he talked about that 2-3%. Remove all the constrains civilization puts on women like morality, laws, commonly accepted rules, fear of shaming... and that 2-3% goes up to at least 20-30%. Wouldn't be much suprised if it were even more. Good genes hypothesis or the dual mating strategy is real.
The true rate of paternity fraud on the part of women is at least 30 percent. That's right, one out of three kids are the product of adultery on the part of the wife or paternity fraud.
Men in the audience are not really surprised and kind of depressed. Women were laughing and surprised in the beginning but by the end they were shocked to know their own realilty
Hook up culture is the main culture, dating is not even a thing anymore. So defining a date in the modern atmosphere would be tough at best. I think Netflix and chill is far more prominent today than out on a formal date for dinner
At times the audience looks decidedly uncomfortable. Partially I think this is because he's opening up some home truths that we'd rather not hear, but I think reducing the mating process to some cold, scientific cost/benefit analysis leaves out a crucial, for want of a better word, spiritual component. I think people intuitively feel these theories are incomplete, and in some way demean what it means to be human.
Yeah, but that's because humans are not fully awake and aware, nor is there much wisdom, or pure love. Most Humans don't really properly know what love is.
I don't see how women being armed with the knowledge of evolutionary theory to help them avoid men with dark triad traits and avoid abuse/stalking is demeaning.
It lacks, among other things, the aspect where humans are free thinking and feeling SENTIENT beings, not un-concious beings running a biology programm.
Um this is the most BLUEPILLED (men bad women good) video I've seen, theres nothing red pill about this, accept for vaguely elluding to women's hypergamy
Right...believing that Muhammad flew to the moon on a winged horse and that God killed dozens of children for mocking a bald man is a fantastic foundation for a reciprocating relationship. (Sarcasm.)
Look up the main videos that give advice for how to tell a girls into you. Every video I've watched says it's absolutely a sign she wants you if she touches your arm lol
The big question is: are we born with this characteristics , or is it something we develop? Now men can say: Look, every men look at other womans so it's normal. Is it?
It is normal. Our dna is hardwired to mate with the youngest or healthiest looking individual. Which is the same case with women. Women also check out handsome young powerful men. Men check out young, healthy and "motherly" women. Its basically our DNA trying to survive in any way possible.
These characteristics are biological but we can control the degree in which we let them influence our lives. There are both polygamous and monogamous cultures for example.
It's like studying a species, the way a scientist would study rats, rabbit etc behavior the types of test done can be endless to come to a complete or near complete conclusion. Can we really say, people are capable of studying their own species knowing that their are boundaries?
Yes. Cold hard information and data is observable. The boundaries you are referring to have to do with philosophy/metaphysics, which is not the same thing as science.
@@GrubKiller436 It can be done, for sure. But should we really do it (going over ALL boundaries)? And for this we need philosophy. Otherwise pure utilitarianism will turn our scientists into little Dr Mengele, like we see now in China.
I think he might be looking at that “two gene” theory wrong; They get physical/financial investment and genes from mate and emotional investment from the affair. She wants to marry the count, but court the rogue.
At 17:45..."Guys are creep" OK. , This beta guy gives moral lessons on how a man can remain faithful to his wife, but forgets to talk about women's faithfulness. Same old vision.
even when these blue pill people do studies that contradict their views they have to put a blue pill spin on it to limit the damage such evidence would do to their blue pill world.
It is amazing how even intelligent men buy into the story that it's always guys who are at fault. It's just not cool to call women out on anything. What would the female equivalent of "creep" be? Whatever it is I'm sure it would be unacceptable to use. Also he ignores advise on how to handle the 20% of stalkers who are women.
What you guys don't understand, who are bashing David Buss, he is literally a genius in psychology and one of THE premier academics in evolutionary psychology, only behind the two founders of the evo psy domain. Don't get upset that empirical data brings up some information that is less than flattering.
David Andrews - Why should I be upset ? Are you assuming something about me ? I just pointed out that the fact that if it's certainly true that some information can be " less than flattering" about men, the PC culture will prevent David and you to investigate or point out the negative aspects of women's behavior. Because doing so , today, would mean you are misogynist....it's hilarious
I dont know why this audience is laughing so much. Most of what he said was shocking. Its like that person who is getting roasted with truth and cant do anything but laugh at it. Shielding yourself from reality aint gonna fix this ongoing conflict. Things are getting worse with social media and dating apps for both men and women. When everything breaks down, I hope we will go back to normal.
David Buss is not just An evolutionary psychologist, he is THE evolutionary psychologist. He is one of the founders of the entire field!
Best comment here, thank you
yes sir! go mgtow
Thomas Richardson exactly. Evolutionary Theory!!!
Along with Cosmides and Tooby...
He's my professor for one of my classes this semester, one of the best professors I've had so far :D
When my girlfriend at the time started college, one of her classes was Evolutionary psychology and David Buss had written the book she had for that class...reading that completely opened my eyes
Is she still with you?
@@shishram163good question 😂😂😂
@@shishram163 lmao TRU
@@shishram163did you keep her? Your pro woman bias is palpable bro. And sad
do you know what the book was called by chance?
Wow, it's a lot easier to get a stranger to go on a date than I'd have thought!
When they say no, it's hard. When they say yes, it's easy.
Because they probably used very physically attractive people to ask those strangers out
@@kiralight6661 this whole entire study was absolutely manipulated by the human male to feed his ego nothing more than that this guy's nothing but a bullshitter
its so funny how the women are constantly laughing and clapping and the men are just staring
Why do you think that is?
Their game is up
Men are romantics
One of the very few TED Talks that deserves to have millions of views, and of course it doesn't have them
Pragmatic/Realistic psychology is my favorite type of psychology. It invalidates most ideological views over the subject in a heartbeat.
This is actual science. That's why.
His core views are ideologically influenced. The feminism is already there hissing how he samples and interpreted the data
He is supposedly a world leader in the subject? For real? That is the sad state of science and what people consider intelligence 😂🫠😳
@@GrubKiller436dismissing data and coloring the results via bias, is not science at all. It’s an attack on science
Oh my God! By far one of the very few genuinely beneficial videos among all the TED videos! Absolutely love it!
Hey… I’m with you here ! 👍
Dr Buss’s lecture is so interesting and makes logical sense. At the same time, had me laughing as he’s so entertaining.
Someone give this guy a beer!
@@pratiktembhekar1996 true
@@pratiktembhekar1996 this sems 90% blue pill, 10% red pill to br honest, alot of man bashing here
@@corysmith3447maybe hes a Simp?
@@corysmith3447
You are right !
he was very annoying with that !
Why?
I don't hear anything funny, and don't understand why people are laughing like they're at stand up comedy. Very valuable information for us ladies. Be extremely discerning in your mate selection.
You must not hear his tone of voice. He's got terrific delivery.
@@DebNKY I had no trouble hearing him. Dont think its humorous subject matter.
Yes, but it is. Information like statistics is dry. If the speaker presents them in humor, people are more apt to remember.
@marleyofficialmedia
@@DebNKY i see what you mean, and I do agree. I also do think in this context its kinda like the lion joking about eating the gazelle. The lion thinks it's funny and then is confused that the gazelle does not laugh. You know?
It's not though. It's just looking at the differences between men and women. Nobody's getting devoured. @marleyofficialmedia
This man is just absoultely inspiring, it makes me think about maybe becoming a psychologist one day
I was there live. By far the most hilarious talk!
Yawn
That's awesome! How much were the tickets? I want to attend a TED Talk someday.
Cool 👍. How much did it cost ?
When parents give THE talk to their children, it should be along those lines. It could save their life, or at least their happiness. Mating is a very practical matter, but it is often presented in an useless way.
“ They think they’re hot, but they’re not” lol
He made a big mistake There, good you caught that.
He took a phenomena that women do “think they are hot” and projected it onto men😂. It is more sad than lol. As he is supposedly a representative of the highest level of his subject and its domain
"Don't smile at your stalker."
Yeah...I'm taking notes. Lol
Are you a girl
Boy, he ain't kiddin'. Men see what they want to see, and they are wrong 90% of the time. This is why women live in fear; they can't even be nice to someone without aggression. Definition of aggression: forcing someone to do what they don't want to, on any level, especially when you have willfully ignored what they are telling you.
Well said.
Someone give this man a medal.
Man of the year
Men find them in more conflits because they are responsible for the pursuit, often correlated through misunderstanding.
Gem of a psychologist great communication and presentation.
David Buss is always incredible
This guy is my professor!
4:57 that dude not applauding in the middle, amazing x)
This was such a useful and insightful video! 🙏
I met my wife when she was 14 yrs old, married 6yrs later. Happily married for 40 yrs.. I guess I am abnormal.
Profoundly abnormal, no doubt. And (as long as this society keeps going in the same direction as it does nowadays) you´ll be getting more, and more, abnormal with each passing day.
It depends on how old you were when you met her...🤔
Check the Dna of your kids.
@@accurategamer7085 Done, no issues. We are all connected in our family tree.
@@Steelhorsecowboy noic3
Thanks for this very intersting video.
Smart man. I wish he'd be more blunt about these facts but I realize it's necessary for him to water down the truth to appeal to the audience.
Makes me never want to get married and have kids.
@Language and Programming Channel Marriages are very normal in a society.
It is basically the way society balances the wants of both sexes inter and intra competition.
@@ikengaspirit3063 he said marriages are not natural not that they’re not normal- which is true
@@emilian7052 Even Hunter Gather societies tend to have some sort of pair bonding. The breaks from that tend to be in highly ritualized contexts.
Maybe Marriage as the West does it now is "unnatural" but the basic thing taht when it appears in other cultures we will call "marriage" is.
@Language and Programming Channel Idk bruv they be jeolousy out there so idk how Harems are normal
The best way I can describe it is a polyamourus but monogamous society. Monogamous only when humans see a key factor of a beneficial long term partner and polyamourus only on the occasion.
In my mind it's the only right thing to do. It's all too shallow and unreliable. Why would I risk my time and emotional investemnt in a person that can decide to leave at any point? Also why would I do the same to someone else? It's very cruel and I don't feel like participating in the game at all.
Nature is pretty cruel.
Over perception bias I would argue is a natural component of the mating process given the obvious numbers men must pursue in order to achieve what they desire.
Is florida really a good statistical representation?
Even worse, Floridian college students.
I believe this study has been replicated across multiple cultures witch consistent results. If you're interested, do a google search on it.
🤣🤣🤣@@caucasianafrican1435
College campuses aren't good representations either. Look up the WEIRD theory.
Men cheat once or for a short term when they get an opportunity.
Women have the long term affair.
with whom? other women? xd
He didn't state it as an absolute this was based on statistics of a controlled group
Literally a common trope that the man cheats and lives his wife for a new woman and relationship. This trope simply doesn’t exist for women. It’s not solid data but we both know this trope which says enough. You sound silly.
@@ТатьянаРохасI should’ve just read your comment because you destroyed their logic so succinctly. Even if you consider only single women this would mean women often have short term relationships too lmao.
Excellent presentation!
You mean penetretion
3:03 dude was not having it
Because he knows he's a 4 out of 10 and the resultant implications are grave.
Well, this was a lot of insightful stuff about mating, and that's very important, but partnering up for life is also about sharing and nurturing. Having some common interests and values. 2 people can *reinforce* each other that way, with each one having the other's happiness at heart.
Best Tedtalk ever!
I'd automatically think I was being pranked.
Sir, your "Evolution of Desire" changed my (vision of) life. It should (not) be studied at school.
Wdy wanna say dude
I've never cheated, but I've been cheated on by at least half of my girlfriends. So either the women are lying about whether they are cheating, or I'm really good at wooing women out of my league who then proceed to realize that fact.
Definitely lying.
Keep in mind Buss is a sophisticated liar.
@Status DMG Like I said Buss and his followers are just aggrandized teenage boys who push the same "biotruth" narrative to rationalize their immaturity.
Probably the last one, own experience can never be taken as representative for a national or international standard. Sorry that happened to you tho.
I think it’s a personal issue and also cultural.
Straight up one the most intriguing talks.
WORTH WATCHING! So right on. Very good.
One of the best Ted talk i watched! Thanks David Buss😊
Isn't the term Branch-Swinging.
Princesses that are more Tarzan then Jane
"She's not "yours", it's just your turn."
MGTOW
Yes sir
Dreaming Music
A hard truth.
She is yours for as long as you stay a desirable man, if she leaves you it's either because you lucked out with her in the first place or your just not a good man, at least anymore.
+Create Channel
pfffft [snort] Let me guess; you're either a woman, or a man under the age of 25 who has never been divorce-ra ped.
I would another person be yours??
This was insightful.
less data stability and academical work than my fking bachelors lol
This is so interesting.
Curious...if the threat of violence and death could be removed, how many women would say yes? How about adjusting for social shaming?
Not to mention pregnancy and STD's.
Great talk!
yes sir
Curious, what is this business about someone being an "8" wanting "10's"? Where does Prof. Buss have a list of these rankings and the definition of what constitutes an "8" or a "10" and so forth? Would appreciate help if someone could direct me to a book or essay the Professor has written about this subject.
just a quick informal way to explain the much more complex concept of people having different mate values, he doesn't use it in his research
@@Johnny_Savage Well then, your statement begs the question, who is a "10" and who's not. Buss states that "10's" are more likely to cheat on a mate that is not a "10", so it might be helpful to know who you're hooking up with.
I also have to say that this guy has a unique talent for pointing out the obvious: After reams and reams of research, he concludes that rich men are more attractive to women. Jeeves, quick! My smelling salts! Something a lot of hapless males have known for centuries.
Usually in studies regarding attractiveness, there is one or one group of researchers who assigns these ratings (1-10) to all individuals in the study, following some metric. Dr David Buss' book The Evolution of Desire might be a good place to start.
it's not that deep bro
It's impossible to discern that bc people have different predernces. Part of the absurdity of the entire thing. I mean ranking people into numbers like this should make anyone uncompfortable without the point that it's bs in acccuracy but okay
Thank u Dr. David sir giving us such a grt information
One of the best TED talks!
Very informative
Extra interesting Ted talk! ✨😯👏🏼
That why commitment is a bad strategy for men, short term relationship is the way.
yes sir
And how to you want to preserve you culture and create a Family?
Maximus
You use a surrogate mother of your race, and you raise your children yourself.
kagetsuki23 Poor children growing up without parents.
Only without mom. No big deal.
Great talk, Professor David Buss. Thank you.
Evo psychology meets comedy lol. Great informative talk
too bad that he didn't address mate guarding and paternity uncertainty. that 2-3% false paternity rate sounds dubious, given the large minority of women, per one study, who admitted they would conceal outside paternity from their partner.
the 2-6% has been confirmed objectively by large genetic studies on contemporary populations at least.
Exactly, but what he didn't address is that modern women have the pill, so you wouldn't expect the rate to be big at all. But given the data, it's more likely that his hypothesis is correct.
David Buss forgot to take into account factors of the civilization, when he talked about that 2-3%. Remove all the constrains civilization puts on women like morality, laws, commonly accepted rules, fear of shaming... and that 2-3% goes up to at least 20-30%.
Wouldn't be much suprised if it were even more.
Good genes hypothesis or the dual mating strategy is real.
Sono Tom -
A CDC study showed that approx 30% of live births were to fathers who were NOT the genetic parent.
The true rate of paternity fraud on the part of women is at least 30 percent. That's right, one out of three kids are the product of adultery on the part of the wife or paternity fraud.
Best in the business
thank you
full red pil content..
What does "red pill" mean?
Juan Torres being aware of the truth.
@Hard Truth
And just as importantly, who yourself are. Not what society tells you to be.
@@JuanTorres-ny9ff Watch Matrix.
You won't learn from the matrix, you gotta go on reddit and look for the red pill.
Men in the audience are not really surprised and kind of depressed. Women were laughing and surprised in the beginning but by the end they were shocked to know their own realilty
I don't get people laughing and thinking that is a joke. It's a real life science and biology mechanisms
Laughing at the pain, breaking down of society.
I think they laugh because it's not a joke and that makes it funny
So good,so true!!!
Buss is a boss. Maximum respect. Pure pimpage... Selecta~
notice he just talked about male and female? he didn't take a list of 150 genders
How is this only @ 200K views?????
We are basically not compatible at all. Not surprising.
yea u should try men next time
Hook up culture is the main culture, dating is not even a thing anymore. So defining a date in the modern atmosphere would be tough at best. I think Netflix and chill is far more prominent today than out on a formal date for dinner
This is your Overperception Bias talking.
At times the audience looks decidedly uncomfortable. Partially I think this is because he's opening up some home truths that we'd rather not hear, but I think reducing the mating process to some cold, scientific cost/benefit analysis leaves out a crucial, for want of a better word, spiritual component. I think people intuitively feel these theories are incomplete, and in some way demean what it means to be human.
Yeah, but that's because humans are not fully awake and aware, nor is there much wisdom, or pure love. Most Humans don't really properly know what love is.
I don't see how women being armed with the knowledge of evolutionary theory to help them avoid men with dark triad traits and avoid abuse/stalking is demeaning.
@@BeardLAD wtf?
@@hpe-eo4ce Women don't need ET to know these things, we generally learn them young.
Brilliant
In my teens I always had two backups. There were always two suitable second choices who would show up if I called. You must have that.
Ew
I feel that this catches just one small part of the entire man-woman relationship topic. It lacks the psychoanalytic aspect, which is fundamental.
Because there's no scientific basis to psychoanalysis a la Freud.
It lacks, among other things, the aspect where humans are free thinking and feeling SENTIENT beings, not un-concious beings running a biology programm.
@@catsaresocute650 Yes, it's biological determinism to a high degree.
If this does not red pill you then nothing will.
Um this is the most BLUEPILLED (men bad women good) video I've seen, theres nothing red pill about this, accept for vaguely elluding to women's hypergamy
The way women treated me have red pilled me quite enough to no longer want them.
Thank god! I'm safe.
@Heliotail With that attitude, women don't want you either, so...
Thanks
Weird he didn't mention woman lose their pair bonding ability when they are promiscuous
@Stinkmeaner It's definitely a possibility but more so in women cause they retain DNA of every dude they sleep with
@Marie Baker It's not a lie at all, do your research
@Marie Baker Ever heard of pre ejaculation?
No you’re just worried that you won’t measure up to the man she had prior to u. Give me a break
@@agirl2094 but statistics show that this is true though?
Even I'm pretty sure the investigation was made by experts, I found really hard to trust women's results. You trust her actions, not her words.
This is precisely why religious courtship is important
This talk is: a) hopefully BS b) even if not should be treated as such
@@catsaresocute650 delusional. seek help.
@@HeroinChrist how is it delusional? For f* sake go out and meet some humans
Right...believing that Muhammad flew to the moon on a winged horse and that God killed dozens of children for mocking a bald man is a fantastic foundation for a reciprocating relationship. (Sarcasm.)
@catsaresocute650 it's not BS. This talk is all evidence based.
My Word
Dayum he be Bussin’
2:57 literally me 💀
Look up the main videos that give advice for how to tell a girls into you. Every video I've watched says it's absolutely a sign she wants you if she touches your arm lol
It explains why so many men think like that.
I must admit, that it indeed is a blessing to be asexual
You are not asexual. You are just terrified.
I mean I can see why that talk would geberate that expression, but I can assure you the talk is simply bs
@@catsaresocute650nope
the audience laughed at so much stuff that is actually really sad
The big question is: are we born with this characteristics , or is it something we develop? Now men can say: Look, every men look at other womans so it's normal. Is it?
It is normal. Our dna is hardwired to mate with the youngest or healthiest looking individual. Which is the same case with women. Women also check out handsome young powerful men. Men check out young, healthy and "motherly" women. Its basically our DNA trying to survive in any way possible.
QuantumButthole women don’t look for youth in men, they actually prefer older men, specifically 7 years older on average.
@@Chris-T4 but not because they look old!
These characteristics are biological but we can control the degree in which we let them influence our lives. There are both polygamous and monogamous cultures for example.
It's like studying a species, the way a scientist would study rats, rabbit etc behavior the types of test done can be endless to come to a complete or near complete conclusion. Can we really say, people are capable of studying their own species knowing that their are boundaries?
Yes. Cold hard information and data is observable. The boundaries you are referring to have to do with philosophy/metaphysics, which is not the same thing as science.
@@GrubKiller436 It can be done, for sure. But should we really do it (going over ALL boundaries)? And for this we need philosophy. Otherwise pure utilitarianism will turn our scientists into little Dr Mengele, like we see now in China.
I think he might be looking at that “two gene” theory wrong;
They get physical/financial investment and genes from mate and emotional investment from the affair.
She wants to marry the count, but court the rogue.
People laughing at the strangest things...
>> One guy threatened all the guys in her life until there were none left!
>> Hahaha
At 17:45..."Guys are creep" OK. , This beta guy gives moral lessons on how a man can remain faithful to his wife, but forgets to talk about women's faithfulness. Same old vision.
even when these blue pill people do studies that contradict their views they have to put a blue pill spin on it to limit the damage such evidence would do to their blue pill world.
It is amazing how even intelligent men buy into the story that it's always guys who are at fault. It's just not cool to call women out on anything. What would the female equivalent of "creep" be? Whatever it is I'm sure it would be unacceptable to use. Also he ignores advise on how to handle the 20% of stalkers who are women.
He said " cause the guy is a creep" not " guys are creep".
What you guys don't understand, who are bashing David Buss, he is literally a genius in psychology and one of THE premier academics in evolutionary psychology, only behind the two founders of the evo psy domain. Don't get upset that empirical data brings up some information that is less than flattering.
David Andrews - Why should I be upset ? Are you assuming something about me ? I just pointed out that the fact that if it's certainly true that some information can be " less than flattering" about men, the PC culture will prevent David and you to investigate or point out the negative aspects of women's behavior. Because doing so , today, would mean you are misogynist....it's hilarious
"Mate value", a new concept in my intellectual dictionary that I will exploit to increase my mate value.
there isn't the one and only partner. the oneitis is an personality disorder.
Vienna, huh??? Freud would of loved this :)
Not really, Freuds teacher, Schoppenhauer would had destroyed that guy...
@@attackhelicopter7403 Didn't know Arthur Schopenhauer was Freud's "teacher". And who is that guy?? You talking about David Buss? Lol
Nah not literally, but Freud was a big fan of Schopenhauers books and theories
Let’s not forget about Karl Gustav Jung
Brilliance
Has anyone been keeping track of Mr. 3:03?
I didn't know Gary Busey was this smart
These people will listen to this talk, go home and forget about it and continue to live their lives in their usual bluepilled ways
Probably because the truth, as Buss outlines, is extremely uncomfortable: the more you love your spouse, the more she/he is likely to abandon you.
A man who has an affair is more likely to be unhappy in his marital relationship if his spouse finds out!
Women have long term mate value? TED Talks always bringin' da' knowledge!
And he didn't mention why men shop around, it is to spread seed. Thats why woman decline rapidly in mating value over 30
David Buss: so when it comes to women, its complicated.
Woman too hard, I give up
The poor fella in the brown blazer at 17:38 looks like he just had his whole world demolished by that fact. LOL!
PS: David Buss is a SMOKING hot man.
I dont know why this audience is laughing so much. Most of what he said was shocking. Its like that person who is getting roasted with truth and cant do anything but laugh at it. Shielding yourself from reality aint gonna fix this ongoing conflict. Things are getting worse with social media and dating apps for both men and women. When everything breaks down, I hope we will go back to normal.
Behold, the truth ↑.
They were laughing because it was true man cmon. Humor.