IT'S COMPLICATED! - Best CPU for Adobe Premiere Pro 2024
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 июн 2024
- Pick up any of the BEST CPUs for your workflow in Premiere Pro down below 👇
AD: Get $50 OFF Motion Array Annual subscription with this link: geni.us/MArray
Get 2 Months for FREE when signing up for Artlist: geni.us/TNartlist
✅ Pick up any of the CPUs here: 👇
i9 14900k geni.us/14900k
i9 13900k geni.us/i913900k
Threadripper 7970x geni.us/TR7970x
Threadripper 7980x geni.us/TR7980x
i7 14700k geni.us/14700k
i7 13700k geni.us/i713700k
Ryzen 9 7950x geni.us/7950x
i9 12900k geni.us/i912900k
i5 14600k geni.us/14600k
Threadripper Pro 5995WX geni.us/TR5995wx
i5 13600k geni.us/i513600k
5965WX geni.us/TR5965wx
Ryzen 9 7900x geni.us/7900x
i7 12700k geni.us/ii712700k
Intel Xeon 3475x geni.us/Xeon3475x
Ryzen 7 7700x geni.us/7700x
i5 12600k geni.us/i512600k
Ryzen 5 7600x geni.us/7600x
🔴🔴 Threadripper 7000 Testbench:
COOLER: geni.us/AvSKXv
MOTHERBOARD: geni.us/TRX50SAGE
RAM: geni.us/XfrBrsk
SSD: geni.us/P44Pro1TB
PSU: geni.us/px1600
GPU: geni.us/tuf3090
CASE: geni.us/R4Rd
🟦 Intel testbench:
Motherboard: geni.us/Z790ProArt [Asus Z790 ProArt Creator]
RAM: geni.us/Z790ProArt [Kingston Fury Beast @5600MT/s]
Cooler: geni.us/cnVpbO [Phanteks Glacier One 360MP]
Cooler Fans: geni.us/cRsu3 [Phanteks T30]
OS SSD: geni.us/eRVfwYj [Samsung 980 Pro 1TB]
Project Drive: geni.us/y75Sg [Samsung 980 Pro 2TB]
PSU: geni.us/qs5Asp6 [Deepcool PQ1000m]
🟦 Testbench setup for Xeon w9-3475x 🟦
Motherboard: geni.us/ASUSw790e [ASUS W790e SAGE]
RAM: geni.us/aBvY5uz [Kingston Fury Renegade Pro DDR5 6000Mt/s]
Cooler: geni.us/AvSKXv [Enermax Liqtech II TR4]
OS SSD: geni.us/NDDA [Sabrent Rocket 4.0 1TB]
Project Drive: geni.us/FC5302TB [Seagate Firecuda 530]
PSU: geni.us/brlN77 [Enermax DFX Revolution 1050W]
🟥 Ryzen 7000 Testbench:
Motherboard: geni.us/x670eProArt [ASUS X670e ProArt]
RAM: geni.us/Z790ProArt [Kingston Fury Beast @5200MT/s]
Cooler: geni.us/StrixLCII360 [ROG Strix LC ii 360]
Cooler Fans: geni.us/cRsu3 [Phanteks T30]
OS SSD: geni.us/Hmf9MA [Teamgroup Cardea C440 1TB]
Project Drive: geni.us/2TBm480 [MSI m480 Spatium 2TB]
PSU: geni.us/yZC1Nk [Corsair hx1000]
How Pugetbench tests Premiere Pro: geni.us/OCBb0
👇❗️PC Builds for Creators [Latest]❗️👇
➡️ $750 BB4B (Best-Bang-For-Buck) PC geni.us/750-1300BB4B
➡️ $1500 BB4B Creator PC geni.us/1500-2300BB4B
➡️ $2500 BB4B Creator PC geni.us/2500-3500BB4B
➡️ $4000 BB4B Creator PC geni.us/4000-5kBB4B
Want me to check out some tech or interested in collaborating?
📩 email me: collab@technotice.com
✅ LATEST MERCH HERE: www.technoticestore.com
👉 Advice & 100% Answered on Minnect: geni.us/MinnectLP
FB: / thetechnotice
IG: @thetechnotice
#premirerePRO #Adobe
Video produced by Lauri Pesur
Edited by Sam Ruddick
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: Some of the links in this video description & channel are affiliate links which means by clicking on them and purchasing the item(s) I get a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Using the provided links does NOT change the price for you. Same goes for Newegg, Best Buy, B&H.
⏲️
0:00 Intro
0:27 Full Results - NOT the whole story
1:03 Testing Method & Where to buy?
1:58 Extended Overall Score
3:20 Different RAM Speed
5:00 Extended Overall Analysis
6:50 Motion Array - What it can do?!
8:04 Standard Overall Score Analysis
9:24 LongGOP Explained
10:30 LongGOP Score Analysis
11:20 Why iGPU is Necessary!
14:30 Extended vs Standard LongGOP
15:57 Intraframe EXPLAINED: Good & Bad
18:54 Intraframe Score Analysis
21:07 RAW - Which Codecs are tested?
21:40 RAW EXPLAINED
23:30 RAW Score Analysis
25:56 GPU effects Test EXPLAINED & Resutls
27:32 X3D CPUs - Any Good?
28:18 AMD non 'X' CPUs?
28:46 Conclusion: Which one to get?
29:14 Power Consumption?
30:22 Hybrid Architecture BENEFITS
31:22 When to buy Threadripper?
31:56 Best Choice for MOST people
32:58 Specific Questions & Motion Array! 
Наука
![DON'T BUY THIS CPU! 👉 4 Mistakes to AVOID as Creators! [More Expensive & WORSE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8M_zoDKw7XA/mqdefault.jpg)
The 13600k seems to nail the price/performance ratio for the most things most of the time.
I hope it leaves a legacy of being a legendary well-rounded CPU at a reasonably accessible price point.
fr, and its getting even cheaper
it's still not efficient as 12600k
@@TheAmazingCowpig It is and if you overclock it can about match a 13900k in gaming and single threading it's a crazy good cpu. Ram speed matters a bit more on it tho because of the smaller l3 cache.
You're data and videos played a major role in building my most recent rig. 13600k ftw
How are the new Intel ULTRA CPU's doing togther with ADOBE, comparing to the latest I9/i7? Does the new NPU have any extra positive effect?
Please do the same tests for Davinci Resolve!
Working on it! :)
For someone who wanna get highest frame rates on gaming while planning to free lance video editing on premiere pro, would the 7950x3d be a good choice? Don't really like how hot Intel CPUs are and the dead socket is not enticing.
Do you know you gave the wrong benchmark scores when you compared the mini pc’s with the Mac mini?
Please do the same tests to the free version of resolve
Great video! Very informative
Glad you enjoyed it
Thanks for the video, bro!
I want to upgrade my computer. I am thinking of
taking the risk and investing everything in the processor (without a
GPU). What do you think, Is it worth doing it this way? (for
working in RP and AE)
One of your best best best videos. Thank you. Humble suggestion to do a use care scenario of "Premiere Pro machine: mboard, memory, cooling, etc. for Premiere Pro editors. Kudos !!! 🙌👍👌🙏💪🤗
Noted
About the Intel codec encoding I heard something interesting. It was a message in another video, which one I can't remember, but the user had a AMD based computer with a Nvidia or AMD graphics card. Now he was going to do a lot of transcoding and thought his machine was too slow. He bought a Intel ARC 380 based card and added to the computer. Drivers were installed but the monitor was still connected to his performance graphics card. This allowed him to use the Intel card for media encoding and accelerated the performance by a lot. The software was set to use Intel quicksync just as if he had a intel processor with graphics controller.
Now this might be overkill for most, but if you've got a working high performance machine using AMD CPU or a Intel CPU without graphics it might be an interesting option.
The Intel ARC A380 is cheap and will be fine if you don't need it as a primary graphics card. The A750 and A770 are overkill for this use, at least for what I know. There are also a series of professional graphics cards in series called the A50, A50 and A60. I don't know about their pricing or if they are as good at encoding video as the A380.
Can you do one for lightroom classic but specifically the AI De-noise function as it seems to be the thing that requires the most horsepower from GPUs.
Whats happened whit 14700k in this scores? Is that right?
Hello there. Say, is there any useful thing you can do with an AMD iGPU (lets say 7900 non x) in terms of content creation,
or is it really nothing but a fallback in case your GPU says bye? And if not now, maybe in the future?
For now, it's useless...
Do you have a link to the mat that you are using under your mouse?
well, I am building a new fresh build, should I get the I5 or I7? Because I am really worried about the temps of the cpus, even with good watercooler.
Don't worry about the temps, make sure stock power limits are applied! :)
amd 7960x 5,8ghz 24core vs intel 14900 24core ? benchmarks tests ?
We can do that! :)
Thank you, great video and super useful. If I could ask for two requests in the future when you have time. Firstly I'm waiting for Intel arrow lake to upgrade. I will get either i7 or i9 15th gen. I'm a bit worried about the i9 at low usage, will it run significantly hotter than the i7? I've always purchased i7 for this reason. The other is a specific use case for some youtubers. Premiere Pro is not great at handling nvenc h264 (footage recorded from obs 4k 60fps with cqp 12 for eg) on the timeline (the export comes out fine though), could you look into this? Thank you for the great content, super useful. And thank you for explaining the igpu, so many people think the benefit doesn't exist.
h264 in general isn't great to edit in but intel's quick sync does help a lot in having a smoother scrubbing experience. Ideally you should transcode it to intraframe ProRes and use it as proxy which is way smoother but the drawback is that it would take minimum 3x the space of the og footage.
Sir, if we use intel core i7 or i9 with some powerful rtx card for rendering a large project which might took 2 to 3 days 24*7
Will the core i processors reliable like xeon or threadripper for 24*7 work loads?
The important part is not to try to overclock anything if you are looking for total stability. There is still the memory which may impose a slight risk of corruption. I've worked building servers, thousands of them, and in the testing the memory was statistically the most likely to cause a problem. Now servers use ECC memory and that makes a huge difference. Well the difference between the occasional bit corruption and no bit corruption. This is smaller than most believe as in the 24 hour test all our machines went through perhaps one in fifty machines would log a bit error. The difference between ECC and non ECC memory is that on a machine with ECC all you get is a entry in the system log about a memory error that was fixed by ECC. Well usually that's all. There is still the chance that several bits are corrupted and ECC can't correct the problem. There's more things that a server or professional card can do to protect you from memory errors but that's overkill right now.
Memory errors can actually be rathe unsuspected. Now I have repeatedly been told by people that they have never had a memory error, and I don't believe them at all. Thing is that a single bit error is extremely hard to see when it happens. In todays computers a very large part of the memory accesses is things like graphics or sound. Now you may hear a tic in the sound but almost all single bit errors of graphics goes unnoticed. The problems we really see are program crashes. But the amount of memory sued to store actual executable code is very little and at most times we blame a crash on a bugs in some code. Now these may still happen with slower memory or even ECC memory but when that happens you will get a notice in the system log that a memory problem has occurred. Don't get panic over a single single bit error that ECC could handle, but if you get several there is something bad going on. If that happens look at the data. With any luck the errors will all come from a single DIMM. You can try moving it to another memory slot to see if the problem is dependent on the DIMM or the slot. If the errors reoccur but at a different adress it's probably the DIMM. If they stay at the same address it might be the DIMM slot or perhaps the processor.
For a stable machine don't do any overclocking, use reasonably fast memory, that means not buying the fastest memory possible. Stay sensitive, you want it to be safe not extremely fast. That doesn't mean slow, just don't try to reach the limit of the motherboard and CPU. And keep the CPU cold. A AIO is fine, but not really necessary as you won't be stressing the CPU by overclocking or raising the available current by a lot. But decent cooling is better than having the CPU throttle because it get warm.
An interesting idea would be to add a ARC A380 card for the encoding. According to Intel this should be able to raise the encoding performance by something like 38% compared to using only the GPU in the Intel processor for encoding. The A380 doesn't need to be the primary graphics card to work so you could use a Nvidia or AMD graphics card for the graphics and just use the A380 for encoding. This should work for AMD based computers and Intel based computers using a "F" processor as those does not have an integrated GPU so Intel Fastsync doesn't work with these.
Thank you my friend.
No problem 👍
The question I have though is this, I am a videographer, video editor and a photographer/retoucher...and I spend A LOT of my free time messing around with AI. I am trying to figure out what I should build that satisfies all of this without just blindly spending thousands of $$$. I've been watching videos that say get this if you are a video person and ignore it if you do lightroom...but what about both? Will it work well with AI? What if I want to play games on it occasionally? Is there such a thing as a good all around system that isnt a budget breaker? My worry is everytime I finally have capital to build up, it usually goes toward having to get new drives to store old work :/
im also a videographer that shoots, edits and does his own sound. Im also a pro photographer with a lifetime of Lightroom, Photoshop and use Topaz Photo AI as well as KreaAI for my Graphic Design job. I also like to game ocasionally and want to do so in 120hz. first off - CPU 13700k, gpu (if you're poor like me) gtx 1080ti, DDR5 RAM 32gb, go for higher speeds like 6400. get a fairly good motherboard like an Aorus Elite AX Z690 DDR 5. Only use high quality gen 4 ssds, like the crucial T500 and always go for 2tb drives. I got all my parts on the second hand market where many of them came in new and at half price..( you'll have to do some scouting). i never received a broken pc part. i repeat most stuff came in new or unused (or stolen?).
There's not really that much of a difference on the CPUs. Any would do. The more cores for video and productivity, the better (usually). For gaming, faster fewer cores can be a benefit.
As there are no AMD X3D CPUs included (they are somewhat slow for productivity), Intel is king here in gaming. So what's left, is to choose a CPU that is from Intel, is in the middle of the field, and has as many cores, as possible. Or do as I did half a year ago, and switch to AMD. Just to be stubborn towards Intel.
For gaming just about any processor would do fine, but for video encoding I'd suggest a Intel processor. Just make sure it's not a "F" series processor as these don't have the integrated graphics core and won't work with Intel Quick Sync which is the media encoding. For a graphics card you can use AMD or Nvidia based cards. New or old depends on your budget. To increase the media encode performance you can get a Intel ARC card. This doesn't have to even have a monitor installed if all you want is improve media encode performance. Adding a Intel ARC A380 is according to Intel able to improve media encode performance with about 38% compared to using only the graphics core in the CPU. The A380 is cheap, if you can find it on the used market it will be real cheap.
Can you please include timeline performance and exporting times?
Timeline performance can be found as separate videos/livestreams on the channel.
Export times are reflected on the LongGOP/Intraframe/RAW scores, as the percentage better would be better exporting/encoding speed :)
I would second this, timeline performance is very important.@@theTechNotice
@@konvictz0007He answered...
If money is not an object for workflow only - TR
For the 99% workflow - Intel K series
For a balanced 99% workflow and gaming balanced - Intel K series
For gamers only - 7800x3D
I got an i5 13th gen 13400 with 32 RAM and 1030 GPU on ASUS S500 SE Small Form Factor Desktop. Can you guys let me know, how good it is.
u need a better video card bro, and bump up the ram speed to xmp 3200 or 3600 ddr4 or 6000 ddr5
we need same test with DaVinci resolve
Well done
What about After Effects?
No 7950X3D?
@Tech Notice have you tested I9 14900KS?
It's basically the same as the 14900K...
I'm using an AMD Ryzen 5900. Very pleased with it, although I'm using DaVinci Resolve Studio. Pay once and avoid Adobe's monthly ransom.
Please review the Threadripper 96 core CPU (or Epyc 128 core).
I wanted to put together a PC for 2000 euros, with which I can play the latest games, but mainly focus on 4K video editing (Davinci, Premiere, After Effects). Do you think I should go for a 7950X3d or rather an Intel 14700K? I would get a very good AMD deal wich would be cheaper than a i7 config. If someone is knowledgeable about this topic, I would appreciate a response!
Depends if you edit 10bit 4.2.2 then Intel makes sense, if not go AMD
Can I asked why the x3d cpus aren't there?
Did you see me explain that on the video? :)
🙂 in the video he explains that X3D cpus are meant for amd fanboys that are gamers, this video is about video editing so those cpus have no business being in your rig, but if ur wondering the X3D should be slower, theres other video across youtube that show that
Great video. Do one for davinci resolve.
Coming soon, working on it! :)
sweeet.. looks like my i9 13900 KS is not yet dead :P
It feels like they make new CPUS every week nowadays... damn
lol! Just keep creating!
Would be good to see some Ryzen CPUs with 6000mhz CL30 RAM since that's what AMD actually recommends and Ryzens get a lot from faster RAM.
nothing about the new G series huh? :(
Can you do same video for After Effects plz?
One video for Davinci Resolve please.
Working on it! :)
Are you going to do DaVinci next?
Yes
@@theTechNoticeheck yes! By any chance, is AMD GPUs reliable now for video editing?
Intel 12th gen is there but not ryzen 5000s that's unfortunate. We All know the beasts 5950x /5900x /5800x too
any of these is fine just use proxies :P
letsgooo!!!
no way you test 5600mhz and 6400mhz as OC memory on a 14900k lol, my 14700k does 8000mhz no problem
many people who buy intel will definitely tweak around a lot more than amd users to make it just that much more faster than the amd counterparts
As a Premiere Pro user, I think buying 14600k was the right choice.
FOR DAVINCI RESOLVE?
working on it
Top content
Top Comment :)
not tested the TR 7 series?!?!?!?!?!?!?
Erm... ? Can't you see them on the benchmarks? :)
What the! Im blind! Wish to see the 7960x on there though! Highest native boost clock of the bunch.@@theTechNotice
His content never disappoints. Thanks men
cheers!
Valeu!
Much appreciated support! :)
Please include Apple CPUs in the analysis
great idea! Which ones are you interested in?
At least the latest M processors. Because many of us are thinking of buying an Apple system for Adobe softwares.@@theTechNotice
What is misleading with Intel's fastest 13th and 14th gen CPUs is the SUSTAINED performance, i.e your rendering in After Effects takes more than 5 minutes, the Intel CPU can't maintain clocks as well as the latest Ryzen and/or Threadrippers during the whole render time, as they are less efficient and will throttle down clocks to maintain performance... so sure, Intel looks slightly ahead on synthetic short 'burst' benchmarks like those in these tests. But show me which CPU completes a 5+ minute 4K render faster.
EDIT: Sorry did not see if you tested this as I only go halfway (it's a long video!)
Lol funny you say that because the intel cpus have far more clock stability than AMD cpus. MY 13600k can sustain 500mhz over stock indefinitely and the default power limits let you do the same sustained time period at stock frequencies. What actually varies is when in heavier workloads amd cpus will automatically drop clocks no matter what even when ur within temp and power limits while intel cpus do not. If i set 5.5ghz all core on intel and im within temp and power limits it will always be at that frequency no matter what, ryzen cpus on the other hand can drop by like 300mhz just based on workload no matter what even with manual tuning
No, it is very simple. It's Intel K series.
if you can pay for adobe then you can prob afford amd & intel so they dont care, its the ones running openshot on old i3's that need advice
Comment for the algorythm!
Appreciate that! :)
14900KS is out already, $700 something 😂
Another important consideration is the LGA1700 is now dead. So there is no upgrade path for your motherboards. The AM5 and TR have a lot more legs going forward.
Does that really matter that much? I don’t see video editors upgrading their CPU every year unlike gamers with gold lined pockets and Intel’s future platforms will continue to have Quick Sync. Not an AMD hater since if they can fix their Media Engine and make a good competitor to Quick Sync I would switch to them in a heartbeat, their multicore performance rocks!
Oh and TR socket doesn’t have the benefits AM4 and AM5 has, future Threadripper chips will use a different socket and old board wont be compatible with these new chips. Just look at AMDs EPYC server chips: SP3, SP5 and SP6 aren’t cross compatible. These are the chips and sockets Threadripper is based on! (TR5 is SP6)
🙂 no thx, its obvious amd cpus are kinda meh, just budget for a cpu motherboard combo every once in a while, Microcenter has your back for combo bundles
"Dead platform" doesn't matter to someone whose work is basically paying for the CPU. Productivity is important "now", if it's making money, it will pay for whatever comes "later".
The TR chips are faster when using professional codecs, RAW and Prores. And bonus, the cheaper chip is faster. In actually production I can tell you this is a massive difference @@TheAmazingCowpig
Im a rebel and use a 7950X3D and shotcut and Linux for video editing, can play a game at 4k while it's encoding without any problems using parallel processing(openCL) using H.265, I have never timed it, but it depends on video length and what filters im adding, longest one recently was several hours for a 3 hour long 4k video that I used a sharpening filter on and multiple transitions.
Dude youre AWB it's a little warm
28:56 🤤
what it's surely demonstrate is that Premiere is a crappy application, Threadripper slower than Intel.... All hail DaVinci Resolve !
don't forget intel consumes almost double to power and more power can lead to better performance.
I'm sure you know what RAW video is, so either explain it correctly, or leave out the explenation. It is really not needed.
You are using short synthetic benchmarks that skew towards Intel's high boost clocks and making conclusions based on that. What is more useful for buyers is real-world rendering tests, like time to render a video. Here, AMD has the advantage as Intel is unable to sustain high boost clocks and throttle clocks down.
You are mistaken. Most people timeline and editing performance is key. When I edit on Premiere Pro, I can see on task manager that the cpu, igpu and the gpu is constantly being used which is why I prefer Intel as a Premiere Pro user. Most people just leave their rendering/exporting overnight or do something else whilst it's being done.
gotta agree with @konvictz0007
@@konvictz0007 Depends on your workload. My rendering of clips takes 30 mins to 2 hours so I do it during work. Time is money. I am self employed, this means the best CPU to reduce rendering time over is the best one. I don't care about the difference between 13000 and 12000 points between CPUs in a synthetic benchmark, this has absolutely zero noticeable impact on speed while using AE or PP. Try to tell me otherwise.
Please add 6000@CL30 or 6200@CL30 on 7950X :-). I would also say, that you 100% should be 14900K with 5600MT/s.
A cost to performance analysis would be really useful here please. 7600x was bottom of the table but is way way way cheaper than some of those other processors. Not all of us are rich RUclipsrs :P
U can't save some money and buy something more premium
@@def-po8tu I think if we had a detailed cost based analysis, the 7600x potentially might be the best value currently. It's super cheap in comparison and has awesome single thread performance, important in so many applications. You can pick up an AM5 32GB system in the UK for less than £600 without a graphics card... you get a viable future upgrade path too...
The 7600X is just simply the cheapest out of all processors worth talking about. It's a little hard to get around that fact if someone is truly budget-constrained.
... Also I'm pretty sure the 7600X would get beaten by the 13600K/14600K in cost to performance also.
The 12600k literally outperforms it in these tests and costs less and it has an iGPU too but unlike the AMD iGPU this one actually boosts performance. It's probably the best cost/performance. (Disclaimer: Where I live the 12600k costs 5 less than the 7600x.) But the best choice by far is probably the 14600k.
@TheAmazingCowpig yea but how hard is it to save a little more money and get something more premium. That's what I'm doing, is it taking a little longer to get part together yes but will the wait be worth it, yes