This team deserves to win a UCL. I think Inzaghis team is a little bit better with Jose yet that 2010 team won a treble. Inzaghi deserve at least one UCL with this team
Daaaaammmn it was all perfect until you said Arnautovic gave a good contribution ahahah that dude has been a disaster for us, we are hopong to get rid of him in any way possible, but it's gonna be tough cause he wants to stay at Inter. Btw very very good video, you explained a lot of Inter tactics and traits, but as you said there's "another one and another one and another one" ahahah so yeah it's impossible to break them all down. Nice, keep up the good work!
As a Chelsea fan, i wanted Inzaghi at Inter to replace Pochettino because of his dynamic 3-5-2 system, which I think suit the profile of most of our current players and that were out on loan. I hope Maresca can will adopt the 3-5-2 and add his own style to it. This would be ideal Chelsea starting 11 (3-5-2): Jackson. Palmer. Moreira. Angelo. Caicedo. Gusto. Enzo. Colwill. Tosin. James. Petrovic.
Cute, but there is another thing that would have been interesting to face: Inzaghi has always wanted and had the left half-back who is a classic attacking midfielder, slow but who has good feet to play between the lines (L.Alberto, Chalanoglu, Mikitarian)
I think you are too tied to formations, positions and "Guardiolism". Although Inzaghi, Just like every great modern manager, has taken stuff from Pep (like the idea of rest defense, of having a double width to exploit the weak side etc.), i think (and it's Just a personal view, to be clarified) that inter's strenght Is in his players' Freedom of intuition on the field. They don't occupate the field according to 325s or 235s, they establish a rest defense (not Always build by defenders, and there we can find the positional fluidity you talked about), two players in wide regions (again, not Always wingbacks) and then all the other players move in order to give the ball carrier a passing option. It's the relation to establish the position and not viceversa. They cannot be read not because their manager Is a Genius, but because there Is nothing to be read, it's all about intuition, it's like a jam session. If the opposition defends with a zonal marking tendency they'll recognize the space in between the Lines, if the opposition defends marking man to man they'll try and free themselves from each duel with the support of link players in order to close up 1-2s or third man combinations. Going long against man to man opposition isn't enough, smart oppositions Will follow you anywhere and anyways (Atalanta Is a great example and Inter Just beat them 4-0 Always Building up with short and vertical passes). In my opinion playing against low blocks and High pressing teams isn't some kind of skill you Need to achieve, there's no "tactic for low blocks" and "tactic for High presses", Simply if they suffucate you you'll need to be more rapid in your choices and the game Will result more vertical, if you play against teams waiting you you'll have to consolidate a possession and wait for the opportunity of verticality, it's simple. The reason why Brighton didn't do well Is because of injuries and a short team for too much competitions. Arguably de Zerbi didn't revolutionate anything, he Just proposed his view of the positional game, he Just created a trend, in football you don't create anything new actually, there have been some Columbus eggs, but they're finishing now. The Truth Is that this has been for Inter, Bologna (and Juve this season) a Natural adaptation to the trends of serie a, where almost every team defends with man orientation (and some, Just like inter, in a man oriented zonal marking), against a zone you have to instruct your players to position in nevralgic spaces that already are there, in England that's what almost everyone does, against man marking you need to create space with movement, and given the fact that they are constantly adapting to your shape it's obvious that you should'nt have a predetermined shape, but instead move to seek the space in between the men. Pep once said "it's not us that we must move, but the ball, if we move too much we lose" and that was true, but in a world of zonal marking defences. The Truth Is that the modern game Is going back to the old game, everything Is so unpredictable that player's on field intuition Is the Key, they have to know how to play in every way possible and against every way (zonal, man marking, low blocks, High pressing etc.) so the manager becomes more of a master to the players that to other managers, he becomes less of an orchestra director. That's why i don't like to hear about geniuses and teams that win thanks to managers, the most important part shouldn't be about the philosophy (that should instead try to make players smart and universal), but about the methodology (and that's where the real manager's work Is) and about players intelligence, ability and growth. At least this Is my view (and the One i have right now)of football and of what really counts in the modern game, it's normal that two people don't agree on something, i recommend you an article published by Figc herself called "a new era", It can be read both in italian and in english and it is a simple and kinda summative essay on what football Is looking forward to. BTW: Sorry for bad english, i know it's a cliché, but... Yeah 😂
This team deserves to win a UCL. I think Inzaghis team is a little bit better with Jose yet that 2010 team won a treble. Inzaghi deserve at least one UCL with this team
Probably wouldn't go as far as to call it better than Mourinho's, but it certainly has more options.
Daaaaammmn it was all perfect until you said Arnautovic gave a good contribution ahahah that dude has been a disaster for us, we are hopong to get rid of him in any way possible, but it's gonna be tough cause he wants to stay at Inter.
Btw very very good video, you explained a lot of Inter tactics and traits, but as you said there's "another one and another one and another one" ahahah so yeah it's impossible to break them all down.
Nice, keep up the good work!
As a Chelsea fan, i wanted Inzaghi at Inter to replace Pochettino because of his dynamic 3-5-2 system, which I think suit the profile of most of our current players and that were out on loan. I hope Maresca can will adopt the 3-5-2 and add his own style to it.
This would be ideal Chelsea starting 11 (3-5-2):
Jackson. Palmer.
Moreira. Angelo. Caicedo. Gusto.
Enzo.
Colwill. Tosin. James.
Petrovic.
Reece James at RCB feels weird.
As an Inter fan i'd love to see Cole Palmer at Inter.
Nice analysis 👍
Really awesome clip!
Simone Inzaghi "The Demon"
Please do a comparison of Jose and Inzaghis Inter. Thank you ❤
I second this
Excellent breakdown. A lot of good details and points. Anyway you can do a breakdown on Thiago Motta?
Forza Inter 💙🖤💙🖤
great video
Thank you!
Nice ❤
Cute, but there is another thing that would have been interesting to face: Inzaghi has always wanted and had the left half-back who is a classic attacking midfielder, slow but who has good feet to play between the lines (L.Alberto, Chalanoglu, Mikitarian)
⭐⭐
I think you are too tied to formations, positions and "Guardiolism". Although Inzaghi, Just like every great modern manager, has taken stuff from Pep (like the idea of rest defense, of having a double width to exploit the weak side etc.), i think (and it's Just a personal view, to be clarified) that inter's strenght Is in his players' Freedom of intuition on the field. They don't occupate the field according to 325s or 235s, they establish a rest defense (not Always build by defenders, and there we can find the positional fluidity you talked about), two players in wide regions (again, not Always wingbacks) and then all the other players move in order to give the ball carrier a passing option. It's the relation to establish the position and not viceversa. They cannot be read not because their manager Is a Genius, but because there Is nothing to be read, it's all about intuition, it's like a jam session. If the opposition defends with a zonal marking tendency they'll recognize the space in between the Lines, if the opposition defends marking man to man they'll try and free themselves from each duel with the support of link players in order to close up 1-2s or third man combinations. Going long against man to man opposition isn't enough, smart oppositions Will follow you anywhere and anyways (Atalanta Is a great example and Inter Just beat them 4-0 Always Building up with short and vertical passes). In my opinion playing against low blocks and High pressing teams isn't some kind of skill you Need to achieve, there's no "tactic for low blocks" and "tactic for High presses", Simply if they suffucate you you'll need to be more rapid in your choices and the game Will result more vertical, if you play against teams waiting you you'll have to consolidate a possession and wait for the opportunity of verticality, it's simple. The reason why Brighton didn't do well Is because of injuries and a short team for too much competitions. Arguably de Zerbi didn't revolutionate anything, he Just proposed his view of the positional game, he Just created a trend, in football you don't create anything new actually, there have been some Columbus eggs, but they're finishing now. The Truth Is that this has been for Inter, Bologna (and Juve this season) a Natural adaptation to the trends of serie a, where almost every team defends with man orientation (and some, Just like inter, in a man oriented zonal marking), against a zone you have to instruct your players to position in nevralgic spaces that already are there, in England that's what almost everyone does, against man marking you need to create space with movement, and given the fact that they are constantly adapting to your shape it's obvious that you should'nt have a predetermined shape, but instead move to seek the space in between the men. Pep once said "it's not us that we must move, but the ball, if we move too much we lose" and that was true, but in a world of zonal marking defences. The Truth Is that the modern game Is going back to the old game, everything Is so unpredictable that player's on field intuition Is the Key, they have to know how to play in every way possible and against every way (zonal, man marking, low blocks, High pressing etc.) so the manager becomes more of a master to the players that to other managers, he becomes less of an orchestra director. That's why i don't like to hear about geniuses and teams that win thanks to managers, the most important part shouldn't be about the philosophy (that should instead try to make players smart and universal), but about the methodology (and that's where the real manager's work Is) and about players intelligence, ability and growth. At least this Is my view (and the One i have right now)of football and of what really counts in the modern game, it's normal that two people don't agree on something, i recommend you an article published by Figc herself called "a new era", It can be read both in italian and in english and it is a simple and kinda summative essay on what football Is looking forward to.
BTW: Sorry for bad english, i know it's a cliché, but... Yeah 😂
Nice but you forgot like 200 things even more impressive