Pence was there to serve one purpose. To secure the evangelical vote. Trump is at a point now where the Christians trust him regardless of his less than ideal track history. Trump is confident as he should be
JD Vance sounds like someone who owns a used Toyota or Kia dealership and constantly plays ads on the radio and has billboards everywhere. Probably has a catch phrase like “JD Vance will finance”
So people that don't like Trump will like half of his side? Pretty good strategy,,Trump would probably pick a Democrat if he could. Trump was friends/donor for Billl Clinton and Hillary.
The thing that scares me about him is his stance on divorce I may be wrong, but remember, he wants to make it really hard to get a divorce which makes no sense because his running mate had a divorce.
Not long ago, Vance lied about Zelenskyy using US aids to buy a yacht for himself, echoing Russian propaganda. Vance was unusually forceful in opposing the use of frozen Russian assets to pay for Ukraine's recovery efforts from war. He gave me the impression of the most pro-Russia US Senator due to him being so outspoken about it.
I feel like he’s doing that on purpose he’s trying to tap into a certain demographic he trying to pretend like some isolationist at the same time, he’s trying to tap into the culture war part of their republican party because Russia tends to be more conservative the scary part that is actually quite effective I think what people need to know is that we actually don’t spend that much on foreign aid
Vance being a former critic of Trump, even a strong one, isn't a huge blow against him. Politics make strange bedfellows as they say and it's not remotely unusual for running mates to hate each other. Harris was a strong critic of Biden during her short presidential candidacy remember. Eisenhower disliked Nixon, yet still picked him for VP. Reagan picked Bush partially because Bush criticized him.
Also, if JD Vance is VP-elect after Donald Trump wins, he will be the first VP born in Ohio since Charles Fairbanks, who was vice president under Theodore Roosevelt from 1905-1909, as well as the second-youngest elected VP. John C. Breckinridge, who served as VP under James Buchanan from 1857-1861, is still the youngest-ever elected vice president, who took office at age 36.
@@ShermanMark1 It's not the beard. I'm 49 I have no wrinkles. My skin is great and people mistake me to be in my 30s. I've had a beard before and still didn't look that old. I've also served the Military so I can't say it was the street of being a solider. He must be a smoker and drinker. I can not believe he is 39. It's shocking.
I despise J.D. Vance. He rose to fame after Hillbilly Elegy became a national bestseller and he specifically spoke about how populist demagogues like Donald Trump preyed on low-income, low-opportunity communities like where he grew up. He was already selling out his kinfolk in a sense when he portrayed them as backwater drug-addicted hicks that didn't know no better. Yet when he realized folks were beginning to resent him for coming off as an elitist who was above his roots, he decided to swing full MAGA because he knew that would get him right with the very folks he had so sordidly portrayed in his memoir. I guess in a sense he's the perfect running mate for Trump as he's also a full-throttle egotist who only looks out for number one.
Sounds like you didn't read the book. He speaks candidly about very real problems facing the Scots-Irish people in Appalachia. Problems that are consistently overlooked or mocked by the coastal elites. Writing about hardship is very different from disparaging your own people.
If Trump wins, J. D. Vance will be the first Vice President to have facial hair since Charles Curtis, who was the 31st Vice President under Herbert Hoover from 1929 to 1933.
I seem to be the only person who thinks this is a good pick which is a weird place to be since I'm very much on the Trump critic side of things(even as a conservative.) The reasons I think it's a strong pick for Trump: 1. Vance is young(turns 40 next month) which is a big contrast to Biden. 2. He's been one of the leading thought leaders putting some kind of ideological coherence to the hole Trump blew in our politics. I do think we're in a realignment so just want to get it over with. He's a good person for that. 3. He's much more articulate than Trump which probably plays well when debating Harris. 4. Trump this election cycle has been much more disciplined and willing to try to expand his base. Vance is a reassuring pick to his supporters he already has, if he wants to continue down that path.
He’s also a catholic which I think may be of some real benefit of taking some votes away from Biden. But yeah I’m not sure why people think this isn’t a strategic choice.
I think Trump sees and needs younger voters. Vance is probably the most easily relatable to young voters of the 4 hopeful elects. First time voters trying to find their identity might be swayed by his youthfulness. Also his seeming willingness to toe the line
Maybe we can't have kids because we're too busy busting our rears paying for his & everyone else's!!! Did he think of that!? Or the infertility crisis?!! Hillbillies haven't a clue. He hurts Trump. A ton of people here where I live aren't voting for him and it's because he picked this shifty turn coat mess!!! Of course it's gonna lead to problems. He doesn't add anything new to help change or grow, expand the conservative movement. He doesn't look trustworthy. He wears eyeliner.
@@iammrbeat I hope you're right. I, uh, haven't slept since Saturday. I feel like I'm losing my mind! I know saying this is gonna jinx it, but seriously: how much crazier can things get!?
One of the things I love most about your channel is you do your best to keep your own political stances in check while humanizing the candidates. I really appreciate your work. Keep it up!
The difference between Trump and his supporters, when it comes to their attitude toward his former critics, is pretty easily explained, at least IMO. Most of his base - the ordinary voters, not Washington folk - are capable of deep loyalty. They really love Trump, and will never forgive those they believe have mistreated him. Trump, on the other hand, is almost entirely transactional: kiss the ring, and he'll overlook your misdeeds...at least temporarily. In addition, I think Trump has little real interest in people who have always supported him. He seems to take a great deal of pleasure, in humiliating and dominating former rivals, then basking in their adoration and self-abasement. It's almost like an S&M dynamic, without the sex. As for Vance, his defining characteristic, as far as I can see, is his opportunism, a quality he shares with Trump. Then again, that's the case with most of the Rs who have fallen in line. Very few really like Trump, but they know better than to say so. There may be some moderates left in the party, but not many of them have sufficient courage to admit it publicly. Then again, it seems that the whole definition of "conservative" and "moderate" have shifted dramatically since Trump came on the scene. He is not what anyone would have considered conservative back in the 80s (witness his bromance with Putin, for example), yet somehow now he's the real deal, and actual conservatives like Liz Cheney are dismissed as RINOs. The notion of populism, too, has taken a beating. It used to be at least partially about the economic interests of the working class; now it's just a fashionable disguise for nationalism, isolationism, and a whole raft of other "isms" that won't bear close scrutiny. . Heritage Foundation = economic libertarianism meets social conservatism. Worst of both worlds. Christian Nationalism is a contradiction in terms, or at least it should be.
Maybe in terms of consolidating his grip on Ohio because they truly are that crazy. The state GOP literally tried to create a state holiday based around Trump a couple of years ago.
He's a vet, son of a coal miner, and young. Speaks well. Went to Yale. Checks a lot of merit boxes. Trump most likely won the sun belt. He puts Virginia, Pennsylvania Ohio Michigan in play.
I have noticed that many young people have a tendency to just give up if they have two choices that they don’t like, not realizing that there is one choice that they REALLY don’t like. I recognize it because I was also that young person in 2016 who was pissed that Bernie didn’t get the nomination. Now that I’m a bit older, there is nothing I regret more than me and many young people like me not voting in that election. Who knows what we would be talking about today if we all had.
Niki Haily would be A Terrible choice for Trump, since Most people on the right despise her a lot of People like Biden better than her. Which is really saying something.
Mr Beat, my personal list to judging a VP pick is: - Age/Sex/Racial diversity compared to potus candidate or political norms - Add anything unique to ticket - From swing state - Charismatic to both parties - Does 5% better than potus in most recent election If a VP candidate gets all 5, they are an A If a VP candidate gets 4/5, they are a B If a VP candidate gets all 3/5, they are a C If a VP candidate gets a 1/5 or 2/5, they are an F If a VP candidate gets 0/5, they are an I for IRRELEVANT JD Vance gets an F with the age diversity being his only strength. Actual good GOP VP picks would be Nikki Hailey, Ron Desantis, Marco Rubio, Glenn Youngkin, or Tim Scott.
Absolutely not. Former never Trumper. I don’t trust the guy. Trumps inability to surround himself with genuine supporters and friends is the thing that pisses me off most.
Trump’s biggest issue his first term was the instability of his cabinet Dude kept firing and hiring guys every week it seemed Some see he had total control, but no stability and consistency. Seems like a Donald only issue
Don't see how. Quayle's issue was that he was a gaffe machine. Vance, and even the people who can't stand him and thinks his policies are crazy agree with this, is a very smart and articulate guy. He's been one of the main people building an actually coherent ideology for the populist right.
@@HistoryNerd808 the idea of a “populist” right is inherently incoherent. Right wing politics is by definition about maintaining and expanding social and economic hierarchies, and concentrating power at the top. Vance isn’t even a populist. What’s his plan to get political and economic power back to working people?
@@jj947 Not here in America. Our traditional right is what Reagan called his "3-legged stool": fiscal hawks, foreign policy hawks, and social conservatives. This coalition fell apart when communism fell away as a glue holding them together. The populists are different on 2 of those fronts. Also, the right can absolutely be populist, right and left are historical accidents and mean different things in different times and places. As for your question about what his economic views are, I'll point you toward a broader interview he did with Ross Douthat of the New York Times(who he was apparently friends with, even before he wrote "Hillbilly Elegy", his memoirs that put him on the map) from a few days ago. The article is titled "What JD Vance Believes" and it covers a lot of ground like his conversion to Trumpism, his support for foreign policy realism, as well as his populist economics.
Genuine question… has anyone changed their mind/leanings over the last 4-8 years? I feel like the political polarity in that time has left little room for mobility between the options. I would love to hear all civil responses
@@sumitsingh2349 is it? The left wasn't involved in the Capitol attack and many members of the republican party trying to overturn the elections. That seems pretty antidemocratic to me.
At some age any day can be the last day. May Grandma was physically and mentally fit till one day, she suddenly dropped and was in a coma never to wake up.
@tfuenke you need a magnifying glass to see the disparity on the political spectrum from Kamala to Biden, you need to drive a car to go from a Never Trumper to a Trump[er].
Pandering to minorities doesn't work for Republicans. Even with the Platinum Plan, most blacks won't vote for Trump. He needs to go after people who could actually vote for him.
@@mrunderdawg12 The tax base. Which should be catered to for a change. After democrats decimated us!!! This fraud cannot be trusted. He will say whatever if he believes it will promote #1 and help him gain more power. Donald obviously is sabotaging himself, appointing someone whom called him Hitler as his second in command. All of them are super fake crooks who don't stand for any true convictions. People are to exploit & rob. He is either keeping his enemies closer as the saying goes or chose another disloyal pretend Republican. I know when democrats & leftists call Trump Hitler, that's a problem, how terrible!!! But his VP can and he's rewarded!!! It's an embarrassment to the democrats as they're eating this up and Trump gave them plenty of bait choosing a candidate you'd mistake for a nasty liberal. At the same time he's like a Trump frat boy mini, he's all over the place and I don't trust it. Clearly he decided to like Trump after realizing he won't have a career otherwise. Ask Mitt Romney, Liz Cheney, Mike Pence. He's entirely fake. I won't be voting for Trump due to this lapse in judgement. I can't trust it. And after what Judas Johnson did, selling us out to Ukraine. I'm fed up of republicans too. ❤️🇺🇲❤️
I think we really overrate how a VP pick changes the ticket. Most people vote for the presidential nominee and don't really take the VP into strong consideration. Vance won't xhange much. He just needs to do well at the VP debate and stick with Trump on the campaign trail.
@@therealtornadosam He's a Yale lawyer who made millions in silicon Valley pretending to be a blue collar guy. He's so disingenuous that there's no telling what's really going on in his head, and he's obviously a repressed homosexual. He's just about the weirdest dude I've ever seen. Also, how on earth is he ready to be president? Kamala has far more real world experience, and it's really hard to come up with somebody equally incapable as Her. I wouldn't cast my vote for him in a million years. Trump lost me with this one. Rubio, Youngkin, Burgum... all fine. This is the one weirdo I'll never vote for, and picking bad people is Trump's Achilles heal. He screwed us hard here, and if you can't see it, that's your problem.
@@A-Rd Exactly! You can't overrate the alternate for the president. The job means nothing until the president dies and the goofball VP gets sworn in. Then JD Vance is the president, and who the hell is JD Vance?
There are so many reasons I do not trust him. One thing: Why are men in charge of what decisions a woman makes about her body. Secondly, if he flips flops from one side to another he is clearly moving on upwards and has ambition. Thirdly, if he is in the pockets of the elite, how can he represent the regular dude on the street. I don't trust 90% of republicans, to be honest. I worry that Biden will have to step down but if he does, who is going to replace him at this late stage. It almost feels like this country is doomed to failure. I do not feel optimistic.
Just one question if a pro-life woman bans abortion will you accept it?? As its a female who is deciding what a woman does to her body.....and if you are not going to accept then why bring this BS point of " Why men decide for woman body" fool
Glad you made this video. Thanks! The whole election thing is very disturbing. I sure wish Biden would step down😢. I guess the best part about JD Vance is his age.
Used to work in D.C. for half a decade. Over 70% of these politicians and politicos are grifters, especially on the GOP side. At least Democrats occasionally pretend to be philanthropic and charitable.
Good morning Mr. Beat, i know you probably wont see this because theres 350 some odd comments but are you going to cover the respective platforms of the parties when they are fully released?
Jd Vance talking down about his upbringing is kind of like someone from the inner city ghetto who grew up and left it talking down about the ghetto. Everyone and everything about it isn't bad, but there's plenty of valid criticism. That's my thoughts anyway, as a fellow rural southern Ohioan.
Someone suggested a video about making a video on separation of church and state. I think mentioning how countries like France do separation of church and state differently would be nice. The simplified way I’ve heard it described is the US has freedom of religion while France has freedom from religion.
The principles are more or less the same, and have the same source in Enlightenment philosophy, even though the current separation of church and state in France has only been made into law in 1905 (bringing back the revolutionnary era policy, after the Naponeonic concordat which lasted a century). I think the main difference is cultural, and I don't mean only in regard to the catholics/protestants divide (it obviously matters a lot, but there's more to it). The thing is, in France, religion has become something very private, since at least the 4th Republic (it was a very different matter during the 3rd Republic); contrary to a lot of European countries, since that time and the MRP, there has never been a major christian democrat right or centre right political party in France (although some did try to push one, and failed). There certainly are ultra-religious on the far-right (and they are not fans of Vatican II, for a lot of them), but even there the main political figures are wary of using religious talking points in their discourse, they know it would be bad politics. For a long time, French catholics only demonstrated when one topic was brought: "l'école libre" (basically the status and funding of religious private schools). When "La Manif pour tous" happened, and rallied a number of catholics against gay marriage, it was kind of a new thing in the French political culture, but it didn't last, the law passed anyway and the opposition soon dropped. The "culture war" is not really a thing here, abortion is not a political issue for example, gay marriage isn't anymore, and christian nationalism is not a thing either. And the vast majority of French citizens, as it seems, even among religious ones, prefer to keep it that way.
@@welcometonebalia I wish the US had a similar way of viewing religion in politics and government. We have states now trying to force religion in schools, which is unconstitutional and will be challenged in court. But the fact that they even thought it was ok to do is an issue. My takes are extreme in the opposite direction though, I am very anti-theist and view religion as a burden to society. Basically the bad out weighs the good so I don’t think it should be in society/public life.
He has appeal for me, if only he wasn’t attached to Trump’s ticket. I will be voting for Harris. I’m ready for a woman to be president. And the GOP is tearing down LGBTQAI freedoms. I hope to see more of Vance in 2028 or 2032.
Maybe it’s just me, but does it really matter if a VP pick has previously attacked the presidential candidate? I remember Kamala Harris having words with Joe Biden in 2020. That’s just how this works. They bash each other and then typically untie behind the nominee.
Scott or Rubio would have helped with minority vote, but it seems the black vote is swaying in trumps favor after being fed up with biden and trump does well in certain latimo segments. Vance as vp will help with the rustbelt states which is a key area to win the election this year with vance having come from the bottom of the rustbelt to the top of the political stage now.
How do you feel about Project 2025, Mr. Beat, and how trumps plan, aligns with it and many of trumps advisors, etc, are writing it. John Mcentee, what a piece of work.
@@ShermanMark1 sorry, I believe this ass-hat will be a crony that’s just being “tee’d up” to be the next president. I may be an idiot-but I’m observant of trends…
@@ShermanMark1until he’s not. Trump can still drop out from old age later or if similar events that happened this past week in trumps life happen again.
I wonder what happened to Trump’s last running mate? 🤔 🪢
Yeah, why does he need a new running mate?😏
Him and Pence had a falling out
Uh yeah. About that...
Pence was there to serve one purpose. To secure the evangelical vote. Trump is at a point now where the Christians trust him regardless of his less than ideal track history. Trump is confident as he should be
I think he's still hanging around somewhere...
JD Vance sounds like someone who owns a used Toyota or Kia dealership and constantly plays ads on the radio and has billboards everywhere. Probably has a catch phrase like “JD Vance will finance”
I think you are thinking of Bob Vance
Bob Vance, Vance Refrigeration
Well fortunately he was a marine and Yale Law student
I keep thinking of JD Power when I think of him
It an alternate universe this is real.
So Vance went from calling Trump "America's H*tler" to being his running mate.
🤨 sus
Well he introduced Donald to his friend BJ and so now they are all good pals 😅 (kidding)
Am I sensing a talking point for the Democrats?
Guess he meant it as a compliment...?
So people that don't like Trump will like half of his side? Pretty good strategy,,Trump would probably pick a Democrat if he could. Trump was friends/donor for Billl Clinton and Hillary.
😭Homelander working with Sister Sage ahh move he is tired of being with yes man surrounding him? Possibly
The thing that scares me about him is his stance on divorce I may be wrong, but remember, he wants to make it really hard to get a divorce which makes no sense because his running mate had a divorce.
A few things worry me about him. However, Republicans looking over Trump's divorces and other faults is nothing new.
He also said a lot of insane things about marriages, doubling down on his suggestions that spouses should stay in violent marriages.
@@Deladus Just as long as they aren't looking to his 'NO FAULTS' amirite? NYUK-NYUK-NYUK-NYUK-NYUK-NYUK :)))))))
republican has no consistent idealogy.
It doesn’t matter. Divorce is governed by state law, so the Tenth Amendment comes into play.
All I know is Vance Refrigeration stock is skyrocketing
😂
I didn't even know that mega-corporation had gone public. :)
Lolol! I see what ya did there!
You mean Oprah isn't going to be his VP?
lol you're 24 years too late, buddy
Not long ago, Vance lied about Zelenskyy using US aids to buy a yacht for himself, echoing Russian propaganda. Vance was unusually forceful in opposing the use of frozen Russian assets to pay for Ukraine's recovery efforts from war. He gave me the impression of the most pro-Russia US Senator due to him being so outspoken about it.
Yep, thanks for bringing this up.
The Republicans have been proven to work with Putin to get an edge on elections and their opponents.
@@kwill6830 yeah no prizes for guessing who vance is batting for !
I feel like he’s doing that on purpose he’s trying to tap into a certain demographic he trying to pretend like some isolationist at the same time, he’s trying to tap into the culture war part of their republican party because Russia tends to be more conservative the scary part that is actually quite effective I think what people need to know is that we actually don’t spend that much on foreign aid
Damn, I like Vance a lot more after reading this
Vance being a former critic of Trump, even a strong one, isn't a huge blow against him. Politics make strange bedfellows as they say and it's not remotely unusual for running mates to hate each other. Harris was a strong critic of Biden during her short presidential candidacy remember. Eisenhower disliked Nixon, yet still picked him for VP. Reagan picked Bush partially because Bush criticized him.
Yep. Even Martin Van Buren talked trash about Andrew Jackson.
Feels like a Dan Quale kind of pick to me.
I thought literally the exact same thing when I heard the announcement
*Quayle
@@2clicksafety*potatoe
Maybe, but I will give props for having a young running mate.
He's no Dan Quayle
Mr Beat for VP
@@kingech_B15 yea lol
@@kingech_B15 I 3rd this
He’s even older than J. D. Vance, who is 39. Mr. Beat is 42.
@@abrahamlincoln937Mr Beat has more experiences then, let him be VP
Yeah I don't think Mr Beat wants any part of this
kind of weird that beards are taboo in politics now but in the general public having a beard is usually positive
I think that's because there's still such a disconnect between politicians and the general public. This trend is already starting to change.
From a perspective of policy, i disagree with probably 95%, in terms of political maneuvering, JD Vance is a captain in the culture war, so yes.
The culture war still reigns supreme for Republicans.
@@iammrbeatfor republicans? I think it’s fair to say democrats have been peddling a culture war narrative since Obama if not Bill Clinton
Ironic since it's you democrats that can't tell what a woman is@@iammrbeat
Also, if JD Vance is VP-elect after Donald Trump wins, he will be the first VP born in Ohio since Charles Fairbanks, who was vice president under Theodore Roosevelt from 1905-1909, as well as the second-youngest elected VP. John C. Breckinridge, who served as VP under James Buchanan from 1857-1861, is still the youngest-ever elected vice president, who took office at age 36.
Thanks for those facts!
I had been wondering if J. D. Vance would be the youngest VP if elected, so thank you for clarifying!
Short answer? No.
Long answer? Heck no.
How the hell is JD Vance 10-years younger than me and look 10-years older than me.
It's the Beard that he has
Yeah he looks much older than he is.
@@ShermanMark1 It's not the beard. I'm 49 I have no wrinkles. My skin is great and people mistake me to be in my 30s. I've had a beard before and still didn't look that old. I've also served the Military so I can't say it was the street of being a solider. He must be a smoker and drinker. I can not believe he is 39. It's shocking.
@@3x157 t
Hard work does that you peopl
I despise J.D. Vance. He rose to fame after Hillbilly Elegy became a national bestseller and he specifically spoke about how populist demagogues like Donald Trump preyed on low-income, low-opportunity communities like where he grew up. He was already selling out his kinfolk in a sense when he portrayed them as backwater drug-addicted hicks that didn't know no better. Yet when he realized folks were beginning to resent him for coming off as an elitist who was above his roots, he decided to swing full MAGA because he knew that would get him right with the very folks he had so sordidly portrayed in his memoir.
I guess in a sense he's the perfect running mate for Trump as he's also a full-throttle egotist who only looks out for number one.
Sounds like you didn't read the book. He speaks candidly about very real problems facing the Scots-Irish people in Appalachia. Problems that are consistently overlooked or mocked by the coastal elites.
Writing about hardship is very different from disparaging your own people.
I hate to say it, but i respect the beard
If Trump wins, J. D. Vance will be the first Vice President to have facial hair since Charles Curtis, who was the 31st Vice President under Herbert Hoover from 1929 to 1933.
@@abrahamlincoln937 I'm just now realizing how few recent American presidents had facial hair lol
@@chroylikesfish it reduces friction like ass-hairs when you’re nose is going in Really Far!!
Last president to have facial hair is Howard Taft and Woodrow Wilson the first clean shaven president.
@@chroylikesfish His wife is the beard.
I seem to be the only person who thinks this is a good pick which is a weird place to be since I'm very much on the Trump critic side of things(even as a conservative.) The reasons I think it's a strong pick for Trump:
1. Vance is young(turns 40 next month) which is a big contrast to Biden.
2. He's been one of the leading thought leaders putting some kind of ideological coherence to the hole Trump blew in our politics. I do think we're in a realignment so just want to get it over with. He's a good person for that.
3. He's much more articulate than Trump which probably plays well when debating Harris.
4. Trump this election cycle has been much more disciplined and willing to try to expand his base. Vance is a reassuring pick to his supporters he already has, if he wants to continue down that path.
He’s also a catholic which I think may be of some real benefit of taking some votes away from Biden.
But yeah I’m not sure why people think this isn’t a strategic choice.
@@HistoryNerd808 yeah…you’re the only one…
I don't care for vance but I think his pick is generally good for Trump.
He's also a hypocrite
I think Trump sees and needs younger voters. Vance is probably the most easily relatable to young voters of the 4 hopeful elects. First time voters trying to find their identity might be swayed by his youthfulness. Also his seeming willingness to toe the line
lol apparently Vance opposes childless marriages. That's really weird.
Also against no fault divorce
Does he oppose them personally or politically?
@@justsomedude5727 politically. He praised Viktor Orban for created laws that forced married couples to have children.
@@lennoxt.anderson8966 that's just stupid, I should have assumed but I was in such disbelief I had to ask
Maybe we can't have kids because we're too busy busting our rears paying for his & everyone else's!!! Did he think of that!? Or the infertility crisis?!! Hillbillies haven't a clue. He hurts Trump. A ton of people here where I live aren't voting for him and it's because he picked this shifty turn coat mess!!! Of course it's gonna lead to problems. He doesn't add anything new to help change or grow, expand the conservative movement. He doesn't look trustworthy. He wears eyeliner.
Vance said he wouldn't have certified the last election. That's why Trump picked him.
Trump: “we need to unite America”
*proceeds to nominate one of the most far right members of the senate for vice president*
Holy shit you're dumb lol.
Trump is the opposite of a uniter.
@@iammrbeat yeah for mr beat sleepy joe is the "Uniter"
@@sumitsingh2349He's a democrat i guess
@@sumitsingh2349 I don’t think Mr Beat supports Biden either?
The Twilight Zone episode that never ends. I wish I could hibernate for 100 years.
It ends sooner than you probably think.
@@iammrbeat I hope so. We need normality back in the country.
@@iammrbeat
I hope you're right. I, uh, haven't slept since Saturday. I feel like I'm losing my mind! I know saying this is gonna jinx it, but seriously: how much crazier can things get!?
0:55 “I have a few things to say but not a whole lot”
*precedes to talk for 1 hour and 29 minutes*
One of the things I love most about your channel is you do your best to keep your own political stances in check while humanizing the candidates. I really appreciate your work. Keep it up!
I’m voting for Joe Biden 💙💙💙💙
😂😂😂
I guess not everybody is free from the touch of the tism
Lmao
Kennedy is right there bro
@@jorjortheslaya9722kennedy is a conspiracy theorist who should not be let anywhere near an office.
I have no idea if he's the best choice, but it's amusing how he used to criticize Trump, and is now a complete bootlicker of him.
Remember, Obama was also a first term senator. No voting record to defend.
The difference between Trump and his supporters, when it comes to their attitude toward his former critics, is pretty easily explained, at least IMO. Most of his base - the ordinary voters, not Washington folk - are capable of deep loyalty. They really love Trump, and will never forgive those they believe have mistreated him. Trump, on the other hand, is almost entirely transactional: kiss the ring, and he'll overlook your misdeeds...at least temporarily. In addition, I think Trump has little real interest in people who have always supported him. He seems to take a great deal of pleasure, in humiliating and dominating former rivals, then basking in their adoration and self-abasement. It's almost like an S&M dynamic, without the sex. As for Vance, his defining characteristic, as far as I can see, is his opportunism, a quality he shares with Trump. Then again, that's the case with most of the Rs who have fallen in line. Very few really like Trump, but they know better than to say so. There may be some moderates left in the party, but not many of them have sufficient courage to admit it publicly. Then again, it seems that the whole definition of "conservative" and "moderate" have shifted dramatically since Trump came on the scene. He is not what anyone would have considered conservative back in the 80s (witness his bromance with Putin, for example), yet somehow now he's the real deal, and actual conservatives like Liz Cheney are dismissed as RINOs. The notion of populism, too, has taken a beating. It used to be at least partially about the economic interests of the working class; now it's just a fashionable disguise for nationalism, isolationism, and a whole raft of other "isms" that won't bear close scrutiny. .
Heritage Foundation = economic libertarianism meets social conservatism. Worst of both worlds.
Christian Nationalism is a contradiction in terms, or at least it should be.
Definately not a strategic pick
🤣
Maybe in terms of consolidating his grip on Ohio because they truly are that crazy. The state GOP literally tried to create a state holiday based around Trump a couple of years ago.
Politically, maybe, maybe not. But for policy platform it does.
He's a vet, son of a coal miner, and young. Speaks well. Went to Yale. Checks a lot of merit boxes. Trump most likely won the sun belt. He puts Virginia, Pennsylvania Ohio Michigan in play.
He want to make Ohio a sure pick? Even though it’s already is
1:15:18 mans is so excited he almost died
lol
I have noticed that many young people have a tendency to just give up if they have two choices that they don’t like, not realizing that there is one choice that they REALLY don’t like. I recognize it because I was also that young person in 2016 who was pissed that Bernie didn’t get the nomination. Now that I’m a bit older, there is nothing I regret more than me and many young people like me not voting in that election. Who knows what we would be talking about today if we all had.
3:07 "Assuming theres no changes beetween now and the election day" 💀(watching this in august 2024)
Niki Haily would be A Terrible choice for Trump, since Most people on the right despise her a lot of People like Biden better than her. Which is really saying something.
Mr Beat, my personal list to judging a VP pick is:
- Age/Sex/Racial diversity compared to potus candidate or political norms
- Add anything unique to ticket
- From swing state
- Charismatic to both parties
- Does 5% better than potus in most recent election
If a VP candidate gets all 5, they are an A
If a VP candidate gets 4/5, they are a B
If a VP candidate gets all 3/5, they are a C
If a VP candidate gets a 1/5 or 2/5, they are an F
If a VP candidate gets 0/5, they are an I for IRRELEVANT
JD Vance gets an F with the age diversity being his only strength.
Actual good GOP VP picks would be Nikki Hailey, Ron Desantis, Marco Rubio, Glenn Youngkin, or Tim Scott.
I stand with you, Mr. Beat. Regardless of my political views, I’m thrilled to see a millennial finally nominated.
Absolutely not. Former never Trumper. I don’t trust the guy.
Trumps inability to surround himself with genuine supporters and friends is the thing that pisses me off most.
Trump’s biggest issue his first term was the instability of his cabinet
Dude kept firing and hiring guys every week it seemed
Some see he had total control, but no stability and consistency.
Seems like a Donald only issue
If Vance didn’t have connections to Silicon Valley $$$, he wouldnt be in the conversation.
I wonder if he owns stock in ruzzian companies...
I’m amused by how Mr Beat went on about Vance’s beard lol I mean, it is a beautiful beard indeed
Vance sleeps in a racecar bed.
*cough* Dan Quayle *cough*
Don't see how. Quayle's issue was that he was a gaffe machine. Vance, and even the people who can't stand him and thinks his policies are crazy agree with this, is a very smart and articulate guy. He's been one of the main people building an actually coherent ideology for the populist right.
@@HistoryNerd808 the idea of a “populist” right is inherently incoherent. Right wing politics is by definition about maintaining and expanding social and economic hierarchies, and concentrating power at the top.
Vance isn’t even a populist. What’s his plan to get political and economic power back to working people?
@jj947 I do think conservative is probably a better term but that's America hehe.
Meh, Dan Quayle was no Jack Kennedy. J.D. Vance is no Dan Quayle.
@@jj947 Not here in America. Our traditional right is what Reagan called his "3-legged stool": fiscal hawks, foreign policy hawks, and social conservatives. This coalition fell apart when communism fell away as a glue holding them together. The populists are different on 2 of those fronts. Also, the right can absolutely be populist, right and left are historical accidents and mean different things in different times and places. As for your question about what his economic views are, I'll point you toward a broader interview he did with Ross Douthat of the New York Times(who he was apparently friends with, even before he wrote "Hillbilly Elegy", his memoirs that put him on the map) from a few days ago. The article is titled "What JD Vance Believes" and it covers a lot of ground like his conversion to Trumpism, his support for foreign policy realism, as well as his populist economics.
Genuine question… has anyone changed their mind/leanings over the last 4-8 years? I feel like the political polarity in that time has left little room for mobility between the options. I would love to hear all civil responses
@@coolbugfacts123497% of mainstream media is ran by the left
@@coolbugfacts1234 I'm pretty sure you couldn't consider either party to be anti fascism.
@@coolbugfacts1234 the far left party is closer to fascism mate
@@coolbugfacts1234It is well known that reality has a left-wing bias, after all.
@@sumitsingh2349 is it? The left wasn't involved in the Capitol attack and many members of the republican party trying to overturn the elections. That seems pretty antidemocratic to me.
At some age any day can be the last day. May Grandma was physically and mentally fit till one day, she suddenly dropped and was in a coma never to wake up.
Former never Trumper now never stops getting his nose brown from Trump's rump.
@@JOGA_Wills the beard is like ass-hair…it greatly reduces friction between the cheeks!
Kamala did the same thing
@tfuenke you need a magnifying glass to see the disparity on the political spectrum from Kamala to Biden, you need to drive a car to go from a Never Trumper to a Trump[er].
Seems as if he’s concerned about white middle class Americans and not just all Americans…
Pandering to minorities doesn't work for Republicans. Even with the Platinum Plan, most blacks won't vote for Trump.
He needs to go after people who could actually vote for him.
@@mrunderdawg12 The tax base. Which should be catered to for a change. After democrats decimated us!!! This fraud cannot be trusted. He will say whatever if he believes it will promote #1 and help him gain more power. Donald obviously is sabotaging himself, appointing someone whom called him Hitler as his second in command. All of them are super fake crooks who don't stand for any true convictions. People are to exploit & rob. He is either keeping his enemies closer as the saying goes or chose another disloyal pretend Republican. I know when democrats & leftists call Trump Hitler, that's a problem, how terrible!!! But his VP can and he's rewarded!!! It's an embarrassment to the democrats as they're eating this up and Trump gave them plenty of bait choosing a candidate you'd mistake for a nasty liberal. At the same time he's like a Trump frat boy mini, he's all over the place and I don't trust it. Clearly he decided to like Trump after realizing he won't have a career otherwise. Ask Mitt Romney, Liz Cheney, Mike Pence. He's entirely fake. I won't be voting for Trump due to this lapse in judgement. I can't trust it. And after what Judas Johnson did, selling us out to Ukraine. I'm fed up of republicans too. ❤️🇺🇲❤️
Why do you think that?
Never heard of him, but you got me up to speed on this.
Heck yeah
I think we really overrate how a VP pick changes the ticket. Most people vote for the presidential nominee and don't really take the VP into strong consideration. Vance won't xhange much. He just needs to do well at the VP debate and stick with Trump on the campaign trail.
Some people just aren't going to vote for a weirdo like Vance. I'm one of them.
yeah but presidential nominee both senior so considering VP as next president make sense
@@pucker672 How is he a weirdo? Seriously how. That's the last word I've ever thought of to describe him.
@@therealtornadosam He's a Yale lawyer who made millions in silicon Valley pretending to be a blue collar guy. He's so disingenuous that there's no telling what's really going on in his head, and he's obviously a repressed homosexual. He's just about the weirdest dude I've ever seen. Also, how on earth is he ready to be president? Kamala has far more real world experience, and it's really hard to come up with somebody equally incapable as Her. I wouldn't cast my vote for him in a million years. Trump lost me with this one. Rubio, Youngkin, Burgum... all fine. This is the one weirdo I'll never vote for, and picking bad people is Trump's Achilles heal. He screwed us hard here, and if you can't see it, that's your problem.
@@A-Rd Exactly! You can't overrate the alternate for the president. The job means nothing until the president dies and the goofball VP gets sworn in. Then JD Vance is the president, and who the hell is JD Vance?
Jance Dance Vance is a crazy name imo
Questions about overturning elections are pretty pointless now. If Trump wins he can’t run again, no matter what people think😀.
In retrospect: hahahaha no
Beat, you’ve got a tight grasp on this game. I agree with everything you said. Keep up the amazing content
Pretty good unbiased assessment
JD Vance ? Trump May Have Lost My Vote. THIS Pick Makes No Sense !!!* Trump Had BETTER Have A REAL GOOD REASON For That Choice...... *
If you were going to vote for trump before then you dont go for good reasons lol.
@@CatNibbles And why is that ? Trump seems like he will put America first no matter what . Not like your present goverment
@@CatNibbles”only my vote is based on good reasons” okay
He never had your vote in the first place.
@@TheWolverine01 if you believe that then you're already brainwashed
He met the one syllable in his last name requirement
My thoughts about both parties. Is that they not doing enough to keep the county united.
Can you give us your thoughts on Biden dropping out today (21 July) and how Harris would be as the presidential candidate?
Disappointing choice. There were better options.
Well, I wouldn't say he's the worst...
I would!!
Vivek is just as bad if not worse.
@@darlenegriffith6186 I'd say someone like MTG would be a real nightmare.
No, he could very well be an op lol he was a total trump hater at one point. Could just be a plain old grifter too. We might have to find out.
@@hkvp9tactical418 the people who preach diversity, love, equality, togetherness, wanted the assassination of a former president.... Interesting
Is he so unimportant to his own life story that the movie advertises the two actresses and not the actor playing him?
30:10 You called it.
Nixon resigned for the good cause of country.
There are so many reasons I do not trust him. One thing: Why are men in charge of what decisions a woman makes about her body. Secondly, if he flips flops from one side to another he is clearly moving on upwards and has ambition. Thirdly, if he is in the pockets of the elite, how can he represent the regular dude on the street. I don't trust 90% of republicans, to be honest. I worry that Biden will have to step down but if he does, who is going to replace him at this late stage. It almost feels like this country is doomed to failure. I do not feel optimistic.
Just one question if a pro-life woman bans abortion will you accept it?? As its a female who is deciding what a woman does to her body.....and if you are not going to accept then why bring this BS point of " Why men decide for woman body" fool
Glad you made this video. Thanks! The whole election thing is very disturbing. I sure wish Biden would step down😢. I guess the best part about JD Vance is his age.
Ngl, I was expecting Trump to have picked Haley, despite saying it wasn't her...
He couldn't take it. She would occasionally say things that would hurt his precious ego.
Did the GOP actually change or did they just figure out how to say the quiet parts out loud?
It’s hilarious that you think that they are racists
@@jeffslote9671 I didn't, JD Vance did. Unless hating an entire ethnicity doesn't count as racism, they're racist
He has indian wife
@@domenstrmsek5625 oh and will she make him stop hating Mexicans?
@@domenstrmsek5625”I can’t be racist because I have black friends”
Made his money as a venture capitalist, I wonder what the % of representation is in this country when you break it down by income level??
Used to work in D.C. for half a decade. Over 70% of these politicians and politicos are grifters, especially on the GOP side. At least Democrats occasionally pretend to be philanthropic and charitable.
Good morning Mr. Beat, i know you probably wont see this because theres 350 some odd comments but are you going to cover the respective platforms of the parties when they are fully released?
Jd Vance talking down about his upbringing is kind of like someone from the inner city ghetto who grew up and left it talking down about the ghetto. Everyone and everything about it isn't bad, but there's plenty of valid criticism.
That's my thoughts anyway, as a fellow rural southern Ohioan.
Oh my God!! Is he serious?
Went form watching parody funny RUclips videos as a kid to videos like this all in this RUclips account 😂
Maybe, Possibly
@@Xheddar …ahh NO!
Someone suggested a video about making a video on separation of church and state. I think mentioning how countries like France do separation of church and state differently would be nice. The simplified way I’ve heard it described is the US has freedom of religion while France has freedom from religion.
The principles are more or less the same, and have the same source in Enlightenment philosophy, even though the current separation of church and state in France has only been made into law in 1905 (bringing back the revolutionnary era policy, after the Naponeonic concordat which lasted a century). I think the main difference is cultural, and I don't mean only in regard to the catholics/protestants divide (it obviously matters a lot, but there's more to it). The thing is, in France, religion has become something very private, since at least the 4th Republic (it was a very different matter during the 3rd Republic); contrary to a lot of European countries, since that time and the MRP, there has never been a major christian democrat right or centre right political party in France (although some did try to push one, and failed). There certainly are ultra-religious on the far-right (and they are not fans of Vatican II, for a lot of them), but even there the main political figures are wary of using religious talking points in their discourse, they know it would be bad politics. For a long time, French catholics only demonstrated when one topic was brought: "l'école libre" (basically the status and funding of religious private schools). When "La Manif pour tous" happened, and rallied a number of catholics against gay marriage, it was kind of a new thing in the French political culture, but it didn't last, the law passed anyway and the opposition soon dropped. The "culture war" is not really a thing here, abortion is not a political issue for example, gay marriage isn't anymore, and christian nationalism is not a thing either. And the vast majority of French citizens, as it seems, even among religious ones, prefer to keep it that way.
@@welcometonebalia I wish the US had a similar way of viewing religion in politics and government. We have states now trying to force religion in schools, which is unconstitutional and will be challenged in court. But the fact that they even thought it was ok to do is an issue.
My takes are extreme in the opposite direction though, I am very anti-theist and view religion as a burden to society. Basically the bad out weighs the good so I don’t think it should be in society/public life.
@@omarrp14 I can tell you, as a French atheist, I am way more worried by American evangelicals than by French catholics...
The first vice president to serve in the marine corp.🎉
The first veteran on a presidential ticket since John McCain in 2008.
John McCain was a navy officer.
I agree with him on that.
Every man can have a change of opinion.
As time rolls on.history will be kinder to Nixon.
No. Definitely no.
He is a good speaker.
It's called an aEBT card.
As an Ohioan, I wonder how Tim Ryan views this. He got closer than most dems would have in modern Ohio
J.D. Vance, Vance Refrigeration.
He has appeal for me, if only he wasn’t attached to Trump’s ticket. I will be voting for Harris. I’m ready for a woman to be president. And the GOP is tearing down LGBTQAI freedoms. I hope to see more of Vance in 2028 or 2032.
Vivek, MTG, Cotton, and Hawley would all be worse optics wise. Still could've picked better though.
"He's a hardliner on gay marriage despite being younger than me... that's cringe" LMFAO
The Prohibition Party nominated a ticket again, for 2024.
Maybe it’s just me, but does it really matter if a VP pick has previously attacked the presidential candidate? I remember Kamala Harris having words with Joe Biden in 2020. That’s just how this works. They bash each other and then typically untie behind the nominee.
Scott or Rubio would have helped with minority vote, but it seems the black vote is swaying in trumps favor after being fed up with biden and trump does well in certain latimo segments. Vance as vp will help with the rustbelt states which is a key area to win the election this year with vance having come from the bottom of the rustbelt to the top of the political stage now.
JD Vance is a couch and dolphin joke of the year.
Trump 2024
So did Nixon
Please confirm-JD Vance would be the first VP in American history with a full beard.
I live in Missouri. I don’t like Josh Hawley.
No.
How do you feel about Project 2025, Mr. Beat, and how trumps plan, aligns with it and many of trumps advisors, etc, are writing it. John Mcentee, what a piece of work.
Project 2025 is not Trump agenda
Just lost my vote!!
VP is A figurehead so not voting for someone over A VP is kinda dumb
@@ShermanMark1 sorry, I believe this ass-hat will be a crony that’s just being “tee’d up” to be the next president. I may be an idiot-but I’m observant of trends…
@@ShermanMark1until he’s not. Trump can still drop out from old age later or if similar events that happened this past week in trumps life happen again.
@@FidelAlt wow then there is no chance for someone to vote biden as Kamala harris will become president & that is scary af
Everyone forgets about the coldwar.
Come on dude you know this country was better with Trump.
Love your stream
Donor money
JD Vance second political dance
I'm curious to see what else Mr Beat has to say about project 2025