Not only the subtitles helped me understand this video but at the very end is where I absorbed the most out of all this. Great job posting this, totally worth subscribing for more!
Thanks for the video, even 15 years later it helps people out, the Japanese really helped me fully understand it and thanks to the subtitles I was able to learn so much that I'm now an engine engineer at Mitsubishi motors.
The MIVEC vs. VVT-i is a pretty fun race. I raced my buddy who has a 2008 Scion tC, HKS Cold Air Intake,removed catalysis converter, and Magnaflow exhaust vs. My 2011 Lancer with Magnaflow exhaust. He had the advantage in weight and take off the line, but I had the advantage of power in higher RPM's and MPH.
From what I see, Mivec and Vtec run on the same priciple which is 2 primary cam profiles. One for low end torque and the other for high end. The VVT is not nearly as good because it only adjust the timing on a single cam profile. The new iVtec is basically a cross between VVT and Vtec/Mivec. All in all the newer motors seem to be pretty impressive
MIVEC gives variable lift and duration(phase as you call it) for intake AND exhaust. exactly the same as VTEC. if you look at the cam lobes in the MIVEC engine, you'll see that one cam is taller, fatter, starts earlier in the revolution, and ends later than the other. thus greater lift and duration. if you look at the cam profiles for a VTEC engine, you'll have a hard time telling them apart as they look almost identical.
In a nutshell - he tried to race a Civic in his Lancer. After VTEC kicked, his boss ordered him to explain why he lost (which he is doing now) and after that find Fegelein.
I was talking about the engine itself, not the whole car. Toyotas are less efficient due to heavier duty parts because they are overbuilt like you wouldn't believe. You wanna know how many civics, accords, preludes I fix every month? a LOT more than the camyrs'(sp?), corollas, prius's(??), yaris's's's(?!?!?!), echos and all those. I AM my info, I've been an ASE certified drivetrain repair specialist for 20 years.
MIVEC is by Japanese auto manufacturer Mitsubishi VTEC is by Japanese auto manufacturer Honda VVT is by Japanese auto manufacturer Toyota Why would this video be in any language other than Japanese?
cus 90% of youtube understand english while 5% of them udnerstand japanese. also because 35% of all cars in euro are japanese ofc. it should be in english u dumb fuck.
You have wowed me with your words of wisdom. I now totally agree with everything you say. I am hypnotized by your eloquence as you must be as much a master of engines as you are of spelling and grammar, as well as wit.
It's the same system at heart, just Toyota wanted to up the standards... by the time of the AE101 the VVT system was upgraded to VVT-i, in which valve timing was more electronically supported. VVTL-i is the same system, just it's running on dual adjustable cam gears instead of only one like its predecessors.
Correct. The BMW-based technology for (continuously) variable valve lift is brand-named as "Valvetronic". Valvetronic & Vanos work together. I don't know wether Valvetronic beat Honda VTEC to market - but I think it came out around 1999, and I recall it won an "engine of the year" award in it's category. I'm too lazy to try to describe the Valvetronic approach, but it's very different than the approaches shown in these videos (although the essential concept is the same).
Also in the Lancer and Mirage...The 4cylinder mivec engines put out the same power but MORE torque then the same honda engine. 4g92 (1600cc MIVEC) vs B16a (1600cc Honda) Google it...
By the other manufacturers comparing their valve controls systems to Honda Vtec they not only prove that Honda had a working (not gimmick) valve technology but also shows that Honda was ahead in engine technology as Vtec was around years before Mivec, VVT, VVTi, Vanos Copies etc
mivec is also meant to work from a much lower RPM range than VTEC, though without the whole OMG VTEC JUST KICKED IN, that happens when VTEC goes off above 5-6k.
i think what slzkilla was tryin to say is MIVEC was designed as an aid to a turbocharged engine. it was designed to assist with turbo lag, because the evo engines are all turbocharged. Whereas with the honda vtec, it was designed purely for NA tuning. so in the comparison on the video, VTEC would out perform the MIVEC when just considering the NA side of things. It could for all we know outperform it on the turbocharged side of things too. although i doubt it. they should compare Vario-cam too.
soon we can expect variable piston displacement timing, variable connecting rod timing, variable compression ratio timing, mechanics will be getting more and more headaches as well
If you notice on the honda system the intake valves in non vtec open at different times and for different duration for better low end torque and unleashes the dogs in vtec... the others dont do that... which is another reason that in my opinion the honda is the best. GOOD VID
It's true that B16b is better than 4age in term of performance, but on track we r not only considering the engine performance. Turbo is faster compared to NA engine but on track it sux. On track, handling is one of the most important thing. Remember 2nd profile of vtec's cam is nearly 300 degree, but 4age don't have this kind of 2nd profile cam's degree at 4 - 5krpm. VVT also do not give any performance output, it only helps to optimise the fuel efficiency. It's basically a normal 1.6 engine.
Commercially anything that makes power comes at a premium (since power is what everyone wants) hence even if it is old tech (turbo) it is still an option or reserved only for the premium models. Same reason that powered seats, leather and sunroof has been around since the 60's (manufactured cheaper today) and is still a premium and reserved item. But in the intellectual side, producing the same hp or overall performance w/out force induction is regarded as more admirable.
@Descente36 I've not only heard of it mate, I've owned one! I had a 1990 VX-S Galant with a high compression 4G63. It wasn't the engine that was problematic, it was the rest of the car, the electrics, the sundries and accessories. Plus it was pretty heavy and the handling was a bit to be desired. I do believe the Evos and GSRs are excellent cars, but even then still expensive to fix.... still much rather a Mitsi than a Subaru even then.
I couldn't agree more that Honda focuses zealously on producing a good engine, and I can't argue that they usually do a damn good job. However, their VTEC system just is not at all dissimilar from or superior to many other VVT systems.
Yes it does. Thats the whole point of the comparison. Being the best in the same category is all about having more (or the most) amongst your peers (under the same rules and restrictions & category). You cant argue against the most powerful 4 cylinder turbo car by throwing in an argument about a 6 cylinder turbo car, or an 8, 10 , jet or rocket car. The best - is finding a way of having more (than your peers - under the same conditions - could not ). The little things makes the difference.
FIAT had the first VVT system and GM developed VVT in 1975. Alfa Romeo was the first to mass produce VVT. Nissan beat Honda as well with the VG30DE in 86...VTEC finally showed up in 86.
I'm not saying this because I have the mivec. But the Vtec controls only the exhaust valve timing. But the Mivec controls both Intake valve timing and exhaust valve timing. What you may have heard is that hondaq engines with vtec have a higher power output. But that is just the peak power at high rpm but the low-end torque is horrible.
You forget that needed twin turbo and a 5.5ltr engine to perform the way it does. F1 in the turbo era only had single turbo, smaller displacement of 1.5 litre and no doubt lower boost.
I hesitate to say that the new "advanced VTEC" is an IMPROVEMENT, as much as an alteration. instead of using different cam profiles, they are using different rocker arms... different way of doing the exact same thing.
Kinda yes.But trust me low cam works better from a high cam at low-mid rpm range so 2 cam sizes is not bad.But yes Hondas start to pul from 3800+.Its not a problem if your redline is at 9k rpm.
He was saying that even if VTEC is better(you already know what I think about it) Honda is not necessarily the best car company because of it. Personally, I think he's right, it takes more than the best engine to make the best car.
new MIVEC systems also alter lift of both intake and exhaust ports. however they are deemed by people like you to be somehow inferior even though the yield the exact same results. Why is that? is the system somehow better because it is offered on smaller and/or cheaper POS cars?
I dont speak this language..but the number speak for themselves. 4age is 10% lighter than the others and has 90% of the compression ratio of mivec and a BETTER ratio than vtec. 4age is the clear choice for me. Mivec has some impressive figures, just a bit hefty for me :)
You are incorrect. On sohc honda engines the Vtec only controls the intake valves. On almost all of the dohc motors it is controlled on the both intake and exhaust. On the new iVTEC it controls lift on both sides and also advances the intake cam electronically. This allows for the timing to be moddified and tuned for better midrange power and torque.
I'm sorry, I drive the 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X GSR. A highly tuned turbocharged sport sedan, surely Honda's VTEC or i-TVEC can't compete. What do you drive?
@EthansOpinion92 actually mitsubishis engines are powerful and reliable and they have the first ever diesle engine in a car with variable valve timing so dont diss mitsu :)
In my oppinion, and I know (no one asked) is the one that can rev the highest reliably with out breaking, and idle at the lowest rpm. If it can rev higher and make good power over a good spread and idle lower making good economy with good torque at a low rpm up until mid rpm that would be the best engine and and honda is close. Best for the money
@henry51563 actually a stock crx with a b16a with y1 trans will do low 15's high 14's in a quarter mile on street tires. while a stock 5.0 mustang will do 14.5-15 second runs..
so, you are saying 100 year old butterfly throttles and static and/or staged camshaft timing is more advanced than variable intake/exhaust camshaft timing and variable (not staged) intake valve opening? to digress to the waranty issue, BMW has replaced several of the new M5 V10's under warranty. considering the X5's V8 is $21,000 retail, that engine most likeley costs more than most hondas.
@TheForza1000 what do you mean it rusted ? my cousin in england used to have a landrover but it broke down and then she got a shogun 2003 model and she hasent had nothing wrong with it since, and here i c loads of old pajeros still running from 1980s and we have a 1998 galant and nothing has gone wrong with it only ofcourse brake pads and other minor stuff but my pajero is 2010 swb n its great for a girl who doesnt need the big lwb. in kuwait fuel is cheap and actually my pajero does 13.2l/100km
Well my Evo is running strong after about 180,000 miles. *waves goodbye to factory warranty* the only thing I've had to replace on it is the fron driveshafts( one broke so i swapped them both) and the clutch twice( a abuse the hell out of the thing) and I've never owned a vehicle with an automatic transmission...
OK first of all , all the credits goes to Honda becuz they were using F1 technology to develop a variable valve timing engine. since they only had 10 years copyright, toyota quickly took this design and so did bmw. they improved on these the design and made engines like toyota's vvt-i and bmw's valvetronic
Of the words and phrases I did understand (and because I don't speak Japanese there were few) I believe that the only one I truly needed to hear was "Haiyaku".
No they are not identical. Whilst Valve technology of varying the timing (duration it is open or closed) Honda also had variable Cam technology varying the travel (lift) of the valve. Honda had variable timing and lift for both Inlet and exhaust of the engine. Other manufacturers only had variable timing only on the inlet, or only the outlet or both but no lift. Later they may have timing and lift but only on inlet side only, or exhaust side only. Honda gave everything everywhere.
They weren't really made for performance. They were made for mostly fuel economy and city driving. Its quick for a 1.8 SOHC. The 0-60mph is like 7.8sec in the 2006 dx coupe. It gets like 34mpg. They are great cars, but i want a little more power that's why i got the Si.
@Q8ROTORY It all depends on how the MIVEC is set up. Remember that MIVEC/VTEC are just names for variable valve timing. It doesn't automatically mean full high-revving engine. Only toyota makes a distinction between VVT-I (Variable Valve Time Intelligence and VVTL-I (Variable valve Time Lift Intelligence) by adding L in.
@henry51563 The only reason V8's make power is becuase of how many cylinders they have and the HUGE displacement. It's truly amazing engineering when you can get 200+ horsepower out of a 4 cylinder with probably a third of the displacement.
I agree rotary puts out more power per displacement than a Honda (both being N/A). However look at the draw backs on a Rotary. Small displacment yet sucks gas like a large engine (economy is crap), chews oil like its gas (higher maintenance), wears out faster (since its cylinder wall surface area is significantly small), and once its worn it cannot be rebuilt. In a race called everyday life (that lasts longer than 4 hrs) and a budget that is not in the millions i'd have a Honda any day.
![Quando Rondo - Grow Up [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/8zFnCg3BO4Q/mqdefault.jpg)
the Japanese totally cleared things up for me. this video was very helpful.
Same.
Wait... I don't speak Japanese
lmao
🤣
🤣
Honda is Japanese hahaha
Not only the subtitles helped me understand this video but at the very end is where I absorbed the most out of all this. Great job posting this, totally worth subscribing for more!
Juan Cabeza ... and after 1 year, i be here right now to LMAO for ya 😂
Thanks for the video, even 15 years later it helps people out, the Japanese really helped me fully understand it and thanks to the subtitles I was able to learn so much that I'm now an engine engineer at Mitsubishi motors.
I love japanese technical videos because they always have some sort of quasi rock background music w/ B.A guitar solos
MIVEC just kicked in yo!
Mivec is the superior tec lol
The MIVEC vs. VVT-i is a pretty fun race. I raced my buddy who has a 2008 Scion tC, HKS Cold Air Intake,removed catalysis converter, and Magnaflow exhaust vs. My 2011 Lancer with Magnaflow exhaust. He had the advantage in weight and take off the line, but I had the advantage of power in higher RPM's and MPH.
the video just says, that at the end if u want more power, u need a turbo.
From what I see, Mivec and Vtec run on the same priciple which is 2 primary cam profiles. One for low end torque and the other for high end. The VVT is not nearly as good because it only adjust the timing on a single cam profile. The new iVtec is basically a cross between VVT and Vtec/Mivec.
All in all the newer motors seem to be pretty impressive
You know... VTEC and MIVEC does exactly the same thing :)
Oh really ? Like the same exact thing? Or are they slightly different
@@michaelhall3619 MIVEC feels like smooth change ...VTEC feels like an abrupt change over.......the differences never bothered me
MIVEC gives variable lift and duration(phase as you call it) for intake AND exhaust. exactly the same as VTEC. if you look at the cam lobes in the MIVEC engine, you'll see that one cam is taller, fatter, starts earlier in the revolution, and ends later than the other. thus greater lift and duration. if you look at the cam profiles for a VTEC engine, you'll have a hard time telling them apart as they look almost identical.
In a nutshell - he tried to race a Civic in his Lancer. After VTEC kicked, his boss ordered him to explain why he lost (which he is doing now) and after that find Fegelein.
You actually now that MIVEC is way better then VTEC
@@PFelizSuero there's nothing better than vtec. Not even turbos
@@vascorodriguez6642 hahahaha
Bro i have had both and i know which one is better!! MIVEC is way superior!!
@@PFelizSuero why is mivec better ? honest question i am curious
@@TheMoo-o Just better performance bro!!
For English, you can watch my videos in the video response section. Though I've only explained VTEC and 3-Stage, but at least it should be clear.
I don't understand it all, but I already prefer this version ;P
so rare to find your comment so un-noticed xD
rare engineering explained cameo with 15 likes
I can tell that those Japanese guys was talking about cars the whole time
I was talking about the engine itself, not the whole car. Toyotas are less efficient due to heavier duty parts because they are overbuilt like you wouldn't believe. You wanna know how many civics, accords, preludes I fix every month? a LOT more than the camyrs'(sp?), corollas, prius's(??), yaris's's's(?!?!?!), echos and all those.
I AM my info, I've been an ASE certified drivetrain repair specialist for 20 years.
MIVEC is by Japanese auto manufacturer Mitsubishi
VTEC is by Japanese auto manufacturer Honda
VVT is by Japanese auto manufacturer Toyota
Why would this video be in any language other than Japanese?
cus 90% of youtube understand english while 5% of them udnerstand japanese. also because 35% of all cars in euro are japanese ofc. it should be in english u dumb fuck.
Greg Hudnall If the video is in another language with no subtitles, the uploader shouldn't put the title in English.
It's still pretty moot to complain about it.
+NickAndo2 I agree and I can't stand it when people do that
The title was in English plain and simple
You have wowed me with your words of wisdom. I now totally agree with everything you say. I am hypnotized by your eloquence as you must be as much a master of engines as you are of spelling and grammar, as well as wit.
Thanks my friends for everything ❗️🇯🇵
It's the same system at heart, just Toyota wanted to up the standards... by the time of the AE101 the VVT system was upgraded to VVT-i, in which valve timing was more electronically supported. VVTL-i is the same system, just it's running on dual adjustable cam gears instead of only one like its predecessors.
Ohhh, okay.... totally understood. thanks bro.
Correct. The BMW-based technology for (continuously) variable valve lift is brand-named as "Valvetronic". Valvetronic & Vanos work together. I don't know wether Valvetronic beat Honda VTEC to market - but I think it came out around 1999, and I recall it won an "engine of the year" award in it's category. I'm too lazy to try to describe the Valvetronic approach, but it's very different than the approaches shown in these videos (although the essential concept is the same).
Also in the Lancer and Mirage...The 4cylinder mivec engines put out the same power but MORE torque then the same honda engine.
4g92 (1600cc MIVEC) vs B16a (1600cc Honda)
Google it...
By the other manufacturers comparing their valve controls systems to Honda Vtec they not only prove that Honda had a working (not gimmick) valve technology but also shows that Honda was ahead in engine technology as Vtec was around years before Mivec, VVT, VVTi, Vanos Copies etc
mivec is also meant to work from a much lower RPM range than VTEC, though without the whole OMG VTEC JUST KICKED IN, that happens when VTEC goes off above 5-6k.
i think what slzkilla was tryin to say is MIVEC was designed as an aid to a turbocharged engine. it was designed to assist with turbo lag, because the evo engines are all turbocharged. Whereas with the honda vtec, it was designed purely for NA tuning. so in the comparison on the video, VTEC would out perform the MIVEC when just considering the NA side of things. It could for all we know outperform it on the turbocharged side of things too. although i doubt it. they should compare Vario-cam too.
soon we can expect variable piston displacement timing, variable connecting rod timing, variable compression ratio timing, mechanics will be getting more and more headaches as well
I own Cyborg Rs, hope will keep it forever
@dblancer apparently, you've never heard of the 4G63 motor
El japones es totalmente claro para mi, este vídeo fue de mucha ayuda, entendí todo :)
es broma no??? o de verdad lo entendiste...
If you notice on the honda system the intake valves in non vtec open at different times and for different duration for better low end torque and unleashes the dogs in vtec... the others dont do that... which is another reason that in my opinion the honda is the best. GOOD VID
It's true that B16b is better than 4age in term of performance, but on track we r not only considering the engine performance. Turbo is faster compared to NA engine but on track it sux. On track, handling is one of the most important thing. Remember 2nd profile of vtec's cam is nearly 300 degree, but 4age don't have this kind of 2nd profile cam's degree at 4 - 5krpm. VVT also do not give any performance output, it only helps to optimise the fuel efficiency. It's basically a normal 1.6 engine.
Woah !!! Best vid ever!
What did he say?
turn your speakers up ;)
He said balabak noh agayo...
@1PARADOXXX No you can clearly hear mivec, i'm pretty sure every variable valve timing system you can hear when it is working.
Commercially anything that makes power comes at a premium (since power is what everyone wants) hence even if it is old tech (turbo) it is still an option or reserved only for the premium models.
Same reason that powered seats, leather and sunroof has been around since the 60's (manufactured cheaper today) and is still a premium and reserved item.
But in the intellectual side, producing the same hp or overall performance w/out force induction is regarded as more admirable.
@Descente36 I've not only heard of it mate, I've owned one! I had a 1990 VX-S Galant with a high compression 4G63. It wasn't the engine that was problematic, it was the rest of the car, the electrics, the sundries and accessories. Plus it was pretty heavy and the handling was a bit to be desired. I do believe the Evos and GSRs are excellent cars, but even then still expensive to fix.... still much rather a Mitsi than a Subaru even then.
I couldn't agree more that Honda focuses zealously on producing a good engine, and I can't argue that they usually do a damn good job. However, their VTEC system just is not at all dissimilar from or superior to many other VVT systems.
best video ever!!! Now all I need to do is learn Japanese...
thelocustemperor same I'm starting Japanese in college just for this man, you know knowledge is power and this video has both
yup. plus timing tech helps when you have RPMs to work with after it kicks in. That's Honda's specialty with 8,9, and 10K RPM engines. ;)
Yes it does.
Thats the whole point of the comparison.
Being the best in the same category is all about having more (or the most) amongst your peers (under the same rules and restrictions & category).
You cant argue against the most powerful 4 cylinder turbo car by throwing in an argument about a 6 cylinder turbo car, or an 8, 10 , jet or rocket car.
The best - is finding a way of having more (than your peers - under the same conditions - could not ).
The little things makes the difference.
FIAT had the first VVT system and GM developed VVT in 1975. Alfa Romeo was the first to mass produce VVT. Nissan beat Honda as well with the VG30DE in 86...VTEC finally showed up in 86.
@1PARADOXXX it depends on how aggressive the cam profile is
I'm not saying this because I have the mivec. But the Vtec controls only the exhaust valve timing. But the Mivec controls both Intake valve timing and exhaust valve timing. What you may have heard is that hondaq engines with vtec have a higher power output. But that is just the peak power at high rpm but the low-end torque is horrible.
You forget that needed twin turbo and a 5.5ltr engine to perform the way it does.
F1 in the turbo era only had single turbo, smaller displacement of 1.5 litre and no doubt lower boost.
subs won't kill ya you known...
+Hamdan Alharbi
I heard subs can be deadly.
He told that mivec is always better
English please? any translation? TQVM
he is truly wise beyond his years
nice video r4pt0r
mit den vid sieht man gut wie der motor aufgebaut ist und die nockenwellen schaltet :-)
frage: Coltmania?
I hesitate to say that the new "advanced VTEC" is an IMPROVEMENT, as much as an alteration. instead of using different cam profiles, they are using different rocker arms... different way of doing the exact same thing.
Kinda yes.But trust me low cam works better from a high cam at low-mid rpm range so 2 cam sizes is not bad.But yes Hondas start to pul from 3800+.Its not a problem if your redline is at 9k rpm.
@NipponGTO I think Nissan calls them NEO, NEO-RB25DET for instance.
well, they re all japanese so they are all good...
beautiful engineering
He was saying that even if VTEC is better(you already know what I think about it) Honda is not necessarily the best car company because of it. Personally, I think he's right, it takes more than the best engine to make the best car.
And even TViS is not valve timing, I think it has something to do with the intake manifold, do correct me if i'm wrong
My AE82 rolla (with 20V Blacktop) is V V T perfection almost, it blows Hondas, Nissans and Mitsubishis off the road.
Oh what a feeling!
@EthansOpinion92 Actually I believe toyota recieves assistance from yamaha on developing the valvetrains of their hi output engines
i enjoy the constant tourqe of my vvti
new MIVEC systems also alter lift of both intake and exhaust ports. however they are deemed by people like you to be somehow inferior even though the yield the exact same results. Why is that? is the system somehow better because it is offered on smaller and/or cheaper POS cars?
That's 1.6 vs 2.0 turbo . Perhaps u might want a contender with 2 liter engine as well. Have u tried with new civic type R??
damn this looks good now if only i could understand kengi
I dont speak this language..but the number speak for themselves. 4age is 10% lighter than the others and has 90% of the compression ratio of mivec and a BETTER ratio than vtec. 4age is the clear choice for me. Mivec has some impressive figures, just a bit hefty for me :)
ohk, take a 4age blacktop 20v 1.6, a vtec b16a 1.6, and a mivec 4g92 1.6? which one is the best??? u guys decide
so someone correct me if i'm wrong.. Honda was the founder of the variable timing right??
i cant get what he said . can tell me which one better ?
You are incorrect. On sohc honda engines the Vtec only controls the intake valves. On almost all of the dohc motors it is controlled on the both intake and exhaust. On the new iVTEC it controls lift on both sides and also advances the intake cam electronically. This allows for the timing to be moddified and tuned for better midrange power and torque.
I'm sorry, I drive the 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X GSR. A highly tuned turbocharged sport sedan, surely Honda's VTEC or i-TVEC can't compete. What do you drive?
@EthansOpinion92 actually mitsubishis engines are powerful and reliable and they have the first ever diesle engine in a car with variable valve timing so dont diss mitsu :)
In my oppinion, and I know (no one asked) is the one that can rev the highest reliably with out breaking, and idle at the lowest rpm. If it can rev higher and make good power over a good spread and idle lower making good economy with good torque at a low rpm up until mid rpm that would be the best engine and and honda is close. Best for the money
So, wich engine is better??
...a VTI or a 4AGE...??
I'm going to buy car and i am between a Civic VTI and a Corolla G6 4AGE...... some help please!
yea ur right but wut about the civic DX for example how good r those r18a1 engines
So if they wanted to, could they do a V8 vtech?
lol we will have to test to see. the 2zzge on the celica is pretty fast. Don't gsr have B18c? I thought gsr can't pull corolla with 2zzge?
@henry51563 actually a stock crx with a b16a with y1 trans will do low 15's high 14's in a quarter mile on street tires. while a stock 5.0 mustang will do 14.5-15 second runs..
so, you are saying 100 year old butterfly throttles and static and/or staged camshaft timing is more advanced than variable intake/exhaust camshaft timing and variable (not staged) intake valve opening?
to digress to the waranty issue, BMW has replaced several of the new M5 V10's under warranty. considering the X5's V8 is $21,000 retail, that engine most likeley costs more than most hondas.
its just fun and most people dont need or cant afford a 300hp car. i drive my 99 si coupe around hitting vtec all the time like i said its fun
that's vvtl-i , how bout vvt? without lifting. example in 4age 20v engine, it dont have lifting cam but still can kick mivec and b16b on the track.
@1PARADOXXX No...there is a pretty noticeable change in the diamante DOHC V6 mivec...well the ones i've heard anyway
Yeah I would say Honda and Nissan have really nailed down n/a engines. I would say that's why both really outlast the rest of the compition.
Subtitles would be so nice right now.
i completely agree, but admirable doesn't win races, torque does. the most powerful engines in the world use forced induction for a reason.
@TheForza1000 what do you mean it rusted ?
my cousin in england used to have a landrover but it broke down and then she got a shogun 2003 model and she hasent had nothing wrong with it since, and here i c loads of old pajeros still running from 1980s and we have a 1998 galant and nothing has gone wrong with it only ofcourse brake pads and other minor stuff but my pajero is 2010 swb n its great for a girl who doesnt need the big lwb.
in kuwait fuel is cheap and actually my pajero does 13.2l/100km
What about DZNUTZ I heard that's a good one
lmao
Well my Evo is running strong after about 180,000 miles. *waves goodbye to factory warranty* the only thing I've had to replace on it is the fron driveshafts( one broke so i swapped them both) and the clutch twice( a abuse the hell out of the thing) and I've never owned a vehicle with an automatic transmission...
What country are we in again?
Honda does build a pretty bulletproof motor, but I've seen a MIVEC go through HELL and keep going. just look at the WRC Evolutions!
So which system is the best?!
OK first of all , all the credits goes to Honda becuz they were using F1 technology to develop a variable valve timing engine. since they only had 10 years copyright, toyota quickly took this design and so did bmw. they improved on these the design and made engines like toyota's vvt-i and bmw's valvetronic
Sory my freind but I dont have bike :(
You are from Florida? nice....What wether do you have right now? cold or form?
Of the words and phrases I did understand (and because I don't speak Japanese there were few) I believe that the only one I truly needed to hear was "Haiyaku".
No they are not identical.
Whilst Valve technology of varying the timing (duration it is open or closed) Honda also had variable Cam technology varying the travel (lift) of the valve.
Honda had variable timing and lift for both Inlet and exhaust of the engine.
Other manufacturers only had variable timing only on the inlet, or only the outlet or both but no lift.
Later they may have timing and lift but only on inlet side only, or exhaust side only. Honda gave everything everywhere.
They weren't really made for performance. They were made for mostly fuel economy and city driving. Its quick for a 1.8 SOHC. The 0-60mph is like 7.8sec in the 2006 dx coupe. It gets like 34mpg. They are great cars, but i want a little more power that's why i got the Si.
@Q8ROTORY It all depends on how the MIVEC is set up. Remember that MIVEC/VTEC are just names for variable valve timing. It doesn't automatically mean full high-revving engine. Only toyota makes a distinction between VVT-I (Variable Valve Time Intelligence and VVTL-I (Variable valve Time Lift Intelligence) by adding L in.
@henry51563 The only reason V8's make power is becuase of how many cylinders they have and the HUGE displacement. It's truly amazing engineering when you can get 200+ horsepower out of a 4 cylinder with probably a third of the displacement.
Cylinder engines are the most practical and proven format.
Hence not everyone is using Rotary.
Which is the best?
maybe a dumb question, but is this movie available in english somewhere?
4age the best????
I agree rotary puts out more power per displacement than a Honda (both being N/A).
However look at the draw backs on a Rotary. Small displacment yet sucks gas like a large engine (economy is crap), chews oil like its gas (higher maintenance), wears out faster (since its cylinder wall surface area is significantly small), and once its worn it cannot be rebuilt.
In a race called everyday life (that lasts longer than 4 hrs) and a budget that is not in the millions i'd have a Honda any day.
thank you for posting