How Airbus A350 DESTROYED the Boeing 777X Change The Aviation Industry!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 июн 2024
- How Airbus A350 DESTROYED the Boeing 777X Change The Aviation Industry!
===
Intro 00:00 - 00:26
777X and A350’s overview 00:26 - 03:35
Size 03:35 - 04:05
Cabin design 04:05 - 04:31
Cargo capability 04:31 - 05:24
Fuel consumption 05:24 - 07:05
Who’s the winner? 07:05 - 08:40
Qantas chose A350 over 777X 08:40 - 10:31
===
#fligavia #boeing #airbus #a350 #aviation
===
How Airbus A350 DESTROYED the Boeing 777X Change The Aviation Industry!
Boeing is building a new secret weapon that aims to replace the Airbus A3 50 and even A3 80 will be introduced next year.
But hilariously, Airbus somehow gave a big slap to Boeing for that ambition. Find out in today's episode of Flig Avia: How Airbus A3 50 crushed Boeing's Secret Weapon 'the triple 7X'.
But before we start, please hit the subscribe button if you haven’t already so you'll be the first to see our next videos. Now, let’s dive in!
How Airbus A350 DESTROYED the Boeing 777X Change The Aviation Industry!
777X and A350’s overview
The Boeing triple 7X is the largest twinjet ever built. Its enormous engines and unprecedented wingspan promise unmatched fuel efficiency, ushering in a new era of high-capacity, long-range flying. Although it has taken flight, it won't join airline fleets until around 2025, though this timeline could change.
How Airbus A350 DESTROYED the Boeing 777X Change The Aviation Industry!
Meanwhile, Airbus’s A3 50 is now the largest widebody aircraft they produce, following the end of A3 80 production. Constructed with advanced composite materials, the A3 50 is the lightest widebody in production, which Airbus claims results in 25 percent lower operating costs and quieter, more efficient operation.
While the Boeing triple 7X is progressing through its testing schedule, it has not yet been delivered to any airlines. In contrast, the Airbus A3 50 has been in service since 20 15, with over 600 units operated by at least 40 carriers worldwide. 
Авто/Мото
The A350’s composite materials were a game-changer for sure.
I do agree man
In all fairness, the earlier Boeing 787 ("Dreamliner") was also a pioneer in using composites; By being second in this race, Airbus likely learned some important lessons.
@@berkeleyfuller-lewis3442 airbus started to build parts of the frame thirty years ago. So they had much more experience than Boeing who had to leap from B-777 to B.787.
Buy the time the 777x is flying, Airbus will have improved the A350 again to make it an even better aircraft.
Yeah thanks for sharing
Any rumors about a350 neo?
That's already happened. The A350-1000 ULR for project Sunrise (Qantas) is an improved model having a higher MTOW, revised cabin and longer range.
Well, I would say that ULR complites a350 familly rather than replace any existing version
@@karlp8484Yes the might ULR with just 12 orders , what an improvement
Crazy how the A350's efficiency outpaced the 777X before it even hit the market.
Yep, it happened
It hasn't , false information.
Airbus has a 10 year lead over Boeing in sales in this category, including a lot of conquest sales from Boeing. And as we know, because of logistics and training airlines are very reluctant to change horses. It doesn't look like the B777-9 is more efficient than the A350 either, so it brings nothing new to the table - it was supposed to be better than the A350.
But the biggest problem the Boeing 777-9 has is that it's a Boeing. Boeing's quality/safety reputation is in tatters and their ability actually produce planes is highly dimished. Airlines don't like that.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
777 es más seguro 350 y no lo digo yo dicen esperto
The A350's early lead really put the pressure on Boeing!
Airbus is the winner now
At 3:37 - the larger cabin width is actually a detriment for passengers. The airlines will cram more seats across, in both business class and steerage. Each airliner has, of course, two aisles. The A350 is more comfortable because there are fewer passengers in each row. In steerage class, if there are only 8 seats across, each passenger is only one seat from the aisle, making restroom trips easier. In the bad old days, many DC-10s were configured with 9 across - two by each window and five seats in the center. This made a truly miserable experience for the victim in the middle seat, with two pax on each side. Some airlines configure their 777s this way, as well.
thanks for sharing your thoughts
If one was being unkind, you could say the 777x is now 777xMAX.
The only advantage the 777X has is capacity. Otherwise, the 350 outclasses it in everything else...
Yeah thanks for comment
Airbus Fanboy detected
@@Nomad_11 a PROUD Airbus Fanboy!!! and you, a Boeing nut case?
I can't believe the 777X is still in testing while the A350 is flying all over the world.
Ha ha
Slowly like the turtle 🐢
Airbus really hit it out of the park with the A350's design and fuel efficiency.
Yes, it is
At current trajectory...when the first of the 777x variants comes out, I believe we can expect news of missing bolts in the foldable wing tips..
It is said of every airplane when it comes out that it will change the industry. I can’t wait for the 777-9X. No one really knows how the plane will function yet. The 777X is quite a mystery. Don’t knock how it performs so prematurely. Hatred towards an aircraft manufacturer seems like a huge waste of one’s time, energy. “Hate” it before it has proven itself. Smart. It will be a great success. With the number of orders so far, it is off to a good start. Most airlines are probably taking the ‘wait and see’ approach to ordering this massive airliner. So many 777’s flying today are still too young to replace. These things take time. Too bad it is so late but in the future the airplanes being produced by Boeing will not be so dangerously flawed. PS. I love the a350!
yeah thanks for sharing
Dear customer, please buy our brand car. It uses 20% more fuel per passenger and has a higher price. It will be introduced 7 years ago, only several years later then the competitor. The competing product is known for low maintenance and high uptime, and has been in service for over ten years, ironing out any startup-illnesses.
It is only a matter of some unknown timepath for us to get the car legally on the road and set up a production facility. What can go wrong? We only have three other cars in our line-up that are plagued with quality-, safety-, and delivery issues, battling it out with the safety regulators.
Something on these lines must be the sales pitch taught in Boeing headquarters.
I won't bet on a big end of year bonus this year...
thanks for your feedback ✈ ✈ ✈
Regarding the fuel bun-off per passengerr, respectively .009 for the 350 versus .011 for the Tripe, That's a difference of some 22% if your figures are correct.
That's not peanuts.
OK, nice point man
So let's say the 777x enters service in 2026.
How long until Airbus launch an A350neo with a RR ultra fan engine? They can't be that far away now.
It's almost impossible to remember all these number without displaying them in tables where we can see them compared to each other!
Please, give number in the metric (a logical) system!
thanks ✈ ✈ ✈
The A350-1000 payload is limited compared to the actual B777. That’s why in our company, despite we have the A350-900, we had to order the B777X
that's right, thanks for your comment✈️
The A350 is a more modern aeroplane and it may be that Boeing is going to suffer from the same problems as they have with the ageing 737 albeit not catastrophic safety issues.
The two significant issues that have faced the A350 have been paint and the engine issues on the -1000 that Emirates have highlighted, I,e engine life longevity and maintenance which Rolls Royce appear to be addressing and correcting. Rolls however are not the only manufacturer with these type of problems as P&W have encountered significant problems with their engines and its neither impossible or unlikely that the GE engines on the 777X wont encounter problems of their own after entering service. Airbus producing a -1200/1300 A350 would seriously prejudice the 777X but ultimately it is not in the interest of airlines to freeze out Boeing. With Farnborough only five weeks away some of these questions may be answered
Thanks for your sharing
There is nothing wrong with the RR XWB-97 engine which powers the A350-1000, so please stop spreading falsehoods. Emirates problem with this engine is the longevity between servicing, (time on the wing), as it spends much less time on the wing than its sister engine, the -84, because its a souped version and was designed at the limit of technology at the time. Emirates objects to the RR Totalcare maintenence price, which is more expensive, and RR wont cheapen the price because they're spending $1B+ on uprating all the Trents for the benefit of airlines like Emirates.......
If you need the higher capacity, then you have to go with the 777X, if not, you shouldn't!
Basically that's my take.Imo, the higher capacity is the only factor that validates the 777X, and the smaller the variant gets, aka the closer the size gets to the A350, the smaller the advantage gets.
0,08 pounds of fuel vs 0,11 pounds is significant!
thanks for your feedback
I`d like to imagine when B777X does finally enter service it will be something special & offer the premium airlines the very best in luxuriousness & comfort. I think it will be more of a niche aircraft because of it`s running costs & higher purchase price but like A380 it will appeal. A350-1000 on the other hand is more large mainstream size & the perfect replacement for B777-300ER, this is bourne out by recent orders by airlines who want better economy at a more affordable price rather than going ultra-premium. My question to avgeeks on the B777X is:- Whats the likelyhood of any US ( I honestly don`t know if any have ordered it ) airline buying B777X?
If current 777s are anything to go by, the -X will fall way short of the A380 in terms of quietness and passenger comfort.
I think the 777x will do well, due to better economics of the plane
Yeah thanks for sharing
BYE BYE - not bey bey 🙃🙃
thanks for your feedback ✈ ✈ ✈
At 3:46, I realize this was probably an AI-generated voice, which, in this case, sounds natural. But -900 should be pronounced "Dash 900," not "Minus 900." The same mistake is repeated in several parts of the video.
thanks for reminding us
and "tripe seven" 😢
✈️
✈ ✈ ✈
Boeing destroyed itself...
✈ ✈ ✈ thanks for your feedback
It looks like the repeat of DC10 and MD11😮
No lo creo además para Catar a350 no cumple irónico que pongan esto solo por llamar la atención
thanks for sharing your thoughts
Wy don't you show the figures at the same time so one can easier compare them. Just reading a list is not that good. Learn how to make professional videos!
many thanks for your feedback!
Airbus A350 did not destroy B777X, Boeing severely damaged B777X by itself.
yep thanks for your comment ✈ ✈ ✈
777x not gonna fly and A350m much better and beautiful plane and has more range
A350 on the top list now
Delta will NOT order 777X as it is a Loyal Airbus Customer! Delta cancelled its 787 order back in 2016. Delta will operate A350s and A330Neos instead. So, choose Emirates instead of Delta!
thanks for sharing your thoughts✈️
The 737Max destroyed the 777X. When it was grounded BA lost the benefit of the doubt, in all of it's processes. The Alaska door blowout further exacerbated the situation. The 777X doesn't even have a TIA yet, which is required before a year of FAA flight testing can begin. See you in 2026/27. Maybe...
You’re right. Boeing is f*cked itself with 737max
@@FLIGAVIA Not only that - they aren't getting the waivers they used to. The LEAP engine on the Max 8 & 9 got waivered for the carbon fiber nacelle. The Max 7 & 10 are set back a year, just because of this one issue. No waiver.
@@FLIGAVIA The Max 9 and the over-written CCTV, pus the 'we don't have docs' and 'we don't know who did the work' is not winning them any friends.
Strange channel?? AI generated
they only use AI in reading scripts ✈️
Keep caling the boeing 'tripe.'
Yep thanks for your feedback
The A350 is a copy of 787 , let’s talk about the paint issue cover up ( if your not an engineer) keep your mouth shut … the 777 is superior , the FAA is restricting Boeing , saving face from the 737 thing
thanks for your feedback
A350 is not a copy of B787 it's larger and much more comfortable. I've flown both of them many times and prefer A350 ten times over. Has Boeing 747 flying with wings held together with duct tape? 😂
Annoying AI voice
thanks for your feedback, we'll improve it ✈️
Only in Airbus we trust 😍🥰❤️
Thanks for your feedback
Let's say B777 gets certified, how long time will it take to get the manufacturing run smoothly. Years I think. Airbus will miles ahead by then
Yeah thanks for your feedback
The 777X will have the same fate as the Jumbo (B747) and SuperJumbo (A380)
Nice thanks for sharing
Boeing, Boeing, Gone…………
✈️✈️✈️